Players who made their careers in England seem to absolutely hate it when the England national team win.
@reggieibe6 жыл бұрын
Peter Schmeichel still sounds like he has not recovered from the Danish exit from the competition.
@HassanRadwan1336 жыл бұрын
I like Schmeichel's analysis. Honest!
@Nemophilist8506 жыл бұрын
_'in the first game Sterling had three absolute sitters that he missed'_ Is this the level of delusion that the media have reached? Lingard missed three sitters in that game, Sterling missed one chance that would have been ruled out for offside anyway.
@flori14016 жыл бұрын
Schmeichel (Not literally): "you cant say it was unlucky england didnt won in normal time, if they created more chances yes, maybe" and later: " France is propably the best of the remaining 16" France had 4 shots on goal against argentina. argentina had also 4 shots on goal. french keeper saved 1, argentina saved none. In group stage france had never more than 5 shots on target. The most chnaces in the tournament were produced by Germany and he called Germany absolutly bad. His analysing doesnt make a lot of sense
@joecook56896 жыл бұрын
How drunk is schmeikel? Haha. Nice lad. United's best keeper ever probably.
@tonyrowe47016 жыл бұрын
Yeh ….. love you Schmikes, but ya gotta stay off the bottle during the World Cup ……
@RandomShites6 жыл бұрын
No 5 minutes of harsh comments over Henderson's bad acting. Maybe for Peter Schmeichel, it's only "disgraceful, absurd, a circus act, a case study for Fifa to punish vigorously" when you dive and simulate injuries AND you're from south america.
@mistaflippyiv41146 жыл бұрын
Random Shite you can tell you are Colombian from the tears hitting the keyboard as you write. Give it a rest sunshine.
@RandomShites6 жыл бұрын
MISTA FLIPPY IV Tbh I wanted England to win (it was my bet). It just bothers me a lot the lack of consistency on his speech. Coming from Lineker it's less of a deal (he did the same) , it's his country, he's gonna be biased and forget he was tweeting like a teenager against diving when it was about Neymar and pretend Henderson didn't fake he was severely injured just as well. Schmeichel though... And, to say Belgium after that lame game against Japan is ahead of Brazil on this wc? They can indeed win tomorrow, but it's not even a matter of opinion, Brazil is much more balanced overall. Maybe he's just against Brazil. Whatever though, he's just annoyingly impartial.
@limitless19196 жыл бұрын
Mexico best team of the tournament? They beat Germany 1:0, so that would make south korea the best team in the universe? Laughable comment...
@KaitainCPS6 жыл бұрын
Mexico had no composure in the final third. Always took one touch too many, made the wrong choice, fucked everything up. Hopelessly overrated in this tournament. Going on fast breaks means nothing if there's no end product.
@andrewmarshall14606 жыл бұрын
Schmeichel not at all bitter and jealous after Denmark's exit then! I've never heard such crap in my life labouring the point again and again that England were so lucky in the penalty shoot out! Penalty shoot outs are always lucky when you win and bad luck when you lose. Can't believe he's being paid for such no insight drivel.
@mohamedabdelkader86656 жыл бұрын
Southgate has not yet been able to apply the plan he prepared with the English team before arriving in Russia ,as he relied in the friendly matches and matches qualifying for the World Cup defensive style and then the counter attack. The question is why ? because all the teams that played against them play strong defensive methods and therefore did not enable him to play the plan already drawn. Now I'm not able to know the thought and style of Southgate on the pitch and that may extend to the time of his match with Sweden, which plays a fast and balanced ball between defense and attack . Example When The English team scored the first goal i expected from Southgate to drag the Colombian team to his plan and to impose himself but he didn't what we saw from Southgate , he killed the game in the middle of the pitch and this caused the Colombian team to have the ball and build an attack until the equalizer scored. The trick is to involve( Jamie Vardy), who doesn't suit the attacking system for England So far.
@MikeD00116 жыл бұрын
It was a horrible game to watch as a neutral. For some reason Columbia decided to disrupt the flow of the game and hoped to nick a goal which they did. Too bad they didn't go for it. Could have been more open and entertaining.
@Jorbr6 жыл бұрын
Interesting how here in Brazil we don’t see England as a strong team or as going much further in the WC. We talk about Croatia but not about England.
@bagpussmacfarlan90086 жыл бұрын
England haven't had to play a good team so nobody knows. They lost to Belgium but they didn't want to win...Croatia blew away Argentina so we know they can do it against (supposedly) good teams.
@graceygrumble6 жыл бұрын
You should be talking about Belgium. I, honestly, can't see anything other than a Belgian victory, on the form shown by both teams in this tournament, so far.
@joecook56896 жыл бұрын
Sorry, schmeichel, maybe.
@MrTkamine16 жыл бұрын
American referee was the best English player if they have on the next match they will win again
@KaitainCPS6 жыл бұрын
He was far too lenient on the Colombians, especially for their dissent.
@rangersasc6 жыл бұрын
Agreed they should have had a red card for a heat butt and more yellows he helped Columbia for sure
@rangersasc6 жыл бұрын
you know nothing about football that much is obvious
@david_zerreitug6 жыл бұрын
Expecting to hear more garbage thrown at Colombia, but overall a honest and professional analysis. It was luck (and the ref) who allowed England to go to the final 8. And England is not the best team. Were able to make it to the semifinal cause really Sweden lacks creative players, and Croatia were able to show England they are not worthy to make it to the finals.
@MrTkamine16 жыл бұрын
Harry Kane full of dirty tricks and showed no skills at all.
@LDwestwood19866 жыл бұрын
At least England weren't stamping on the penalty spot. In the refs face for ages. Vile play. Don't compare experienced play with dog shit like Colombia
@humanityneedstowakeup.52206 жыл бұрын
Well said.
@supergam116 жыл бұрын
Haha muppet. Colombia should be banned for the dirty antics, at least England played football. Any negative comments is sour grapes
@MikeD00116 жыл бұрын
Bullshit
@TheJohnCooper6 жыл бұрын
MrTkamine1 what on Earth are you on about?
@reignrelic6 жыл бұрын
First the England player was all on top of the Colombian now the Colombian player is not allowed to move his head up? Second, Henry gets a free penalty when he didn’t even have the ball, How? One of the Colombian players got a yellow card for retaliating to Henry aggression and gets a free penalty. Third, The English team gets two throw in opportunities; once because there was already a ball on the field and second time the English player takes out the ball and is encountered by a Colombian player who then passes it to Bacca scores a goal and it the referee disqualifies it and calls for a third throw in. Why? Because the referee was prejudice, a races who had preference over the English team, maybe because he was an American man with English ancestors. Why they didn’t show the replays to the VAR? So they could determine the plays. They didn’t because the is corrupted and actually wanted England to win. That game was a joke, unbelievable.