Comandante德国司令官C40 对比 Kinu M47 | 咖啡手摇磨豆机技术流深度分析比较

[@wokaoniniangshab]

视频里比较的两个手磨，我个人都有。看了您的视频，发现您的评测也不是很客观，偏向于c40较多。不知道是不是您的店里只卖c40。首先，两只磨都是非常非常好的手磨。刀盘材质来说，高氮钢的c40优势。但m47 classic比较大的机身用料优势您直接略过不提了。m47 classic 双主轴支撑是不锈钢，c40是塑料支撑。m47 classic研磨时的手感及钢性优于c40。kinu主轴拆装有倒角，不会影响刀头位置偏移，c40出厂经过校准，经常自己拆装，理论上会有概率出现偏斜，当然也是比较细微的。研磨速度，m47 刀盘更大，速度大大优于 c40，不只差几秒而已。但同时m47也比c40费力一些。研磨挡位调节精细度和范围来说，m47绝对优势。机身总体，m47有点一体性强，但是太沉，力气小的不友好。c40轻便，但是直径略粗，手小玩家不友好。这些只是硬件上的差异，手磨最主要的还是要看出品。m47 原装刀头情况下，研磨均匀度与c40比基本无差，细粉来说c40略少。硬件总结：刀盘c40占优，其它方面m47占优。总的来说，都是很好的磨，而且最主要的比较内容应该是风味表现，而不是纸上谈兵。

[@justinyi4590]

风味用嘴巴说?扯犊子呢

[@wokaoniniangshab]

@@justinyi4590 你意思是全网有关咖啡风味的视频都是扯犊子？嗯？

[@YiqiaoZhang-zx7ly]

C40升级了搞定意式咖啡也很吃力

[@carsonlaw]

非常感谢，毫不犹豫买了M47+手冲刀头，确实一分钱一分货。

[@arkucafe7934]

汗，视频里说C40在刀盘上更胜一筹... 总之开心就好。

[@victorqiu5393]

非常棒的视频，专业客观，没有废话都是干货

[@xniu]

As another commentor stated earlier, this review seems biased towards the comandante C40. The reviewer seems to emphasize the strengths of the c40 while ignoring the strengths of the Kinu m47. One thing that was very misleading was the claim that the m47 was not a true stepless grinder because there are markings for 50 steps on the adjustment wheel. The reviewer never mentions that the user can adjust the grinder so that the grind settting is between each marking which allows the m47 to theoretically have an infite number of settting (true stepless system).

[@panguoliang]

喜欢这样中肯客观的评论，难得这样的商家，果断粉 。虽然我不喝咖啡。

[@pinewang506]

谢谢您的比较视频，赞👍。

[@user-iq9ih8nk8f]

您真的極度有耐心，我也全程看完，跟著樂在其中。 您試過把C40和Kinu M47(甚或加上 1zpresso)磨出來的同一支豆子參雜在一起沖泡嗎？可以試試喔！

[@j0928875963]

目前為止看過最深度的C40&Kinu M47分析影片，全部都用數據來做比較，相當客觀且容易理解。 本身已有C40，有在考慮入手Kinu M47，謝謝你的分析。 雖然C40出MK4了，不過以現在漲快1.6-1.7倍的價格真的是買不下手啊⋯ 更別說是刀盤沒做更新了。 （當初淘寶買不到7000台幣，現在約1萬1-1萬2）

[@vicisheng]

覺得你比較不客觀，偏C40，只講優點不講缺點，反之亦然，騙騙外行人還可以

[@charlesshu3559]

太棒了 我始終選擇C40 買了兩支@@"

[@k0184092]

非常專業及客觀的評析

[@whipperming]

想问 Kinu M47 Classic 和 Apollo的比较

[@taosong9851]

感谢分享

[@ruolinchai423]

我俩都买了 c40完全是徒有其名 价格虚高太过严重

[@y.w7298]

Kinu刀应该做了DLC或PVD的涂层

[@charlesshu3559]

專業影片 已訂閱

[@punitdave7034]

I would pay for this video to be in English. Can anyone tell me what she is saying in comparison between the two? Does she talk about flavor?

[@lv674]

C40刀盘锋利，但非金属骨架刚度略低，M47骨架刚性完美，但刀盘锋利度差，但手冲刀盘也是渗氮处理，一样的，其实单纯的比这些也没啥意义，磨工作是一个整体系统，还是最终出品说了算，为哪个掏钱还是要你喜欢，我就对47的机械感无抵抗力，对40的矮胖无爱，其实哪只买回去都不会后悔。

[@user-lw9cg8db1l]

入了kinu47，c40，lideet，其实都差不多

[@roykeanroy21]

很客观，很不错的分析，KINU M47 配合手冲磨刀兼职酷毙了

[@bowieknife]

What about Kinu 手沖刀盤？

[@bruceb87]

那明显m47更值得这个价格

[@MapleMeHoney]

English please.... at least your final verdict.... really want to know what your opinion is.... I can use google translate if you just write your verdict in chines somewhere

[@arkucafe7934]

Thanks for the interest. There are plenty of resources in English on C40 reviews and comparison, but there are very little good contents in Chinese and language could be a huge barrier. Hence I made my series of C40 videos deliberately in Chinese for the Chinese-speaking users who have difficulties with English. I'm sure you'll find plenty of videos in English comparing C40 and M47. As to conclusions, I avoided making conclusions in my video on purpose. I simply compared the facts about both grinders from ~20 aspects, so the viewer could draw her/his own conclusion. Judging from the feedback, some viewers prefer C40, some prefer M47 after seeing the video.

[@MapleMeHoney]

@@arkucafe7934 Thanks! It's a shame I can't fully appreciate your video as I don't understand Chinese.

[@ruiyang4974]

有点搞笑，肯定要拧紧后研磨啊，这不是废话吗，还担心跑刻度..

[@guozhengzhu532]

手好好看 请问有淘宝店吗

[@arkucafe7934]

每个视频的最后都有淘宝店二维码

[@user-oe4uu2qn2t]

人家比较六七个磨 你就比较这两个吗？

[@arkucafe7934]

一个一个来，不急。深度第一，广度第二。40分钟比较两个磨，和20分钟比较八个磨，本来也是两种视频吧。

[@charleslin7605]

其實比較這兩個也就夠了 目前手磨界的Top 2

[@tomrock4021]

縱向對比跟橫向對比，懂不？

[@user-oe4uu2qn2t]

@@arkucafe7934 说深度第一可也没对比最重要的咖啡粉净匀度以及咖啡出品效果啊XD

[@Rockycm1]

這兩個top 2了。 其他可以不看啦 ＸＤ。