This lecture is very straightforward and explains the concept of Agency in it's most basic form. I gained so much from this lecture and I have also put this knowledge into use in my own video on agency on my KZbin channel.
@oridavidconsult28024 жыл бұрын
Whilst several consent theorists have posited over the years that consent is the basis of agency, I love the fact that you took time to tie agency to authority. And yes, Lord Diplock in the case of Fridman & Lockeyer v Buckhurst Park held that a company can only act through its agent. This lecture is very helpful, and I have incorporated it in my video lecture on my channel, Ori David Consult.
@keshavjugmohun84634 жыл бұрын
Am a LLB Student and I find this lecture very simple but helps a lot to understand the topic. Thank you for the help.
@abubakarusama52138 ай бұрын
Great elucidation
@malachidaniels67473 жыл бұрын
This is so easy and straightforward to understand
@TheLawSimplified3 жыл бұрын
Hi Malachi. I’m glad these lessons have been helpful. Have a look at the comprehensive online law school: go.thelawsimplified.com/Partner
@malachidaniels67473 жыл бұрын
Thank you😊
@elijahmubanga3253 Жыл бұрын
I love this
@warrentoles31273 жыл бұрын
Principal suing the agent to recover damages is called subrogation.
@colinjanetyiascm1443 жыл бұрын
thank you
@massychembe103 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@NaturopathMD7 ай бұрын
This isn't the Law simplified .. It's just legislation simplified. In other words, the farcical behind the curtain of apparent complexity. Which is no less worthwhile, therefore Much Appreciated 😊
@journ_sasha Жыл бұрын
Which sphere of law is the best to pursue?
@tosinabejide76868 жыл бұрын
Hello. Thanks for this lecture. I have a quick question for you please. Is agency necessarily a consensual relationship?
@creativitysquared34397 жыл бұрын
not essentially. I am still trying to see if he is telling English Law. The English case of Boardman v Phipps says the consent is not important.
@oridavidconsult28024 жыл бұрын
Yes, cases like Boardman v Phipps are one of those cases that expose the shortcomings with using the consent theory as the basis for agency. This is because in Agency by Estoppel, which confers ostensible authority on the agent,there is usually no consent between the agent and the principal. This is the same with Agency by Necessity which is a creation of law. Hence, ome cannot use consent as the basis of agency. This is in tandem with the views of the learned writer, Friedman. This is the reason I love the fact that he spoke so much about authority as against tying it strictly to consent. I have advanced similar arguments in my videos on agency on my KZbin channel.
@evkannangara8 күн бұрын
❤
@ngetikehsolangefoncham34935 жыл бұрын
Nice but please what are the forms of agency relationship?? 🙏
@AllthingsHLC7 жыл бұрын
I kept thinking you said Asian instead of Agent aha