Ive been using the Zoom g 1 x four for several years now and cant really complain at all . There's a ton of tone's in this small affordable unit that can be tweaked to anything you want..i still dont know everything thing about it and ive used it for over 3 years..Not to mention the software!! I've Tried several others cheap alternatives and keep going back to it.
@sodapunpunnarai23368 ай бұрын
Good review, I hope you compare Nux MG-400 vs Zoom G2 Four
@melorogerio9 ай бұрын
I'm still using my outfashioned G1on + cuvave for IR. For my taste (and my pocket) this combo still beat both tested in this comparison
@Tone-Quest9 ай бұрын
I still have my G1on too. Great unit.
@ernestojr.angeles97072 ай бұрын
How do you place a wah? Autowah or dedicated, I imagine.
@thatguy70992 ай бұрын
you should retry a comparison but only using one mic at a time for the g1x cabs . the 50/50 blend just sounds like phasing issues .
@VeitLehmann5 ай бұрын
Awesome demo, thank you! I think the G1 four sounds great, but the G2 four sounds more natural and realistic. I'm looking for a small bass multi-effect and I'm torn between the B1 four and the upcoming MS-60B+ (which should sound just like the B2 four). I like how the B1 four works and its features, especially that it also has an app for macOS/Windows. The MS-60B+ only has an iOS app, and I use Android, but it might sound better...
@PremiumExcelcom4 ай бұрын
I agree
@vinniciusdias26282 ай бұрын
B2 four ❤
@mungewellАй бұрын
Like the G2Four, the MS-60B+ has multilayer IR...
@VeitLehmannАй бұрын
@@mungewell I bought the MS-60B+, and I'm very happy with it! Feels great and sounds awesome!
@mungewellАй бұрын
@@VeitLehmann me too 😀 working on supporting it with 'zoomzt2'.
@mungewellАй бұрын
On your comment about IR being matched/fixed to the Amp. The 'ZIR' file is separate, but named the same as Amp.... Maybe we can just rename the files to pick-n-choose combinations.
@Soumil-f7Ай бұрын
Excellent review! If i understand correctly, the G2 Four doesn't have a build in Audio interface, and you have to connect your own Audio interface to connect to your DAW in your PC right?
@Tone-QuestАй бұрын
@@Soumil-f7 Thanks! You can use the G2 FOUR as an audio interface. It is built-in and works fine but you might need to install a driver if you are on Windows.
@Soumil-f7Ай бұрын
@@Tone-Quest thanks a lot! And i believe this feature is absent in the G1X?
@Tone-QuestАй бұрын
@@Soumil-f7 If you are talking about the G1X FOUR, you are correct.
@JesusOurKing5 ай бұрын
Did you try The Vibe and Octave fuzz? Is it passable as a Hendrix pedal?
@tarun2007273 ай бұрын
What is software name for edit in pc for g2x4 ?
@Tone-Quest3 ай бұрын
Guitar Lab for G2 FOUR, but it is for Smartphones, not the PC.
@melorogerio9 ай бұрын
Zoom G2 four has cabinet simulation or Impulse response?
@Tone-Quest9 ай бұрын
I think their wording is impulse responses.
@MrAntisound7 ай бұрын
@@Tone-Quest yeah they use multiple on different loudness levels, than they let them crossover, to simulate a amplifiers response to how hard you pick your strings..sounds a bit like a doubler to me, was probably not their intention but still..
@JudgeFredd18 күн бұрын
G2 sounds way better
@yfcvtiybr2 ай бұрын
I like g1 much more. Sadly no clean sound in demo. Anyway thank you.
@ssslayer2 ай бұрын
G2x amp models (perhaps it is mainly the cabinet models) is really miles better than G1x models. Soujd much much closer to rhe real amp cabinets
@alexforget6 ай бұрын
G2 sound very bad, are you sure it's in correct settings? Is there a switch for direct output. The G1 sound way better, that is surprising as it's not very good with the cab sim.
@Tone-Quest6 ай бұрын
When the G2 FOUR first powers on, you get a choice of connecting via line (direct) or to an amp. I obviously selected line.