Comparison of the Embraer KC-390 Vs the Lockheed Martin C-130J cargo plane.

[@michaelhenzell2]

This Brazilian company is really amazing, manufactures very cheap commercial planes and now has a hybrid plane project with electric motors at the tips of the wings. in addition to the super tucanos and the Gripen NG which, contrary to what many think, is a completely new plane made between Brazil and Sweden.

[@michaelhenzell2]

The cost of the F35's flight time is around 25 to 30 thousand dollars. The Gripen NG is around 4.7 to 7 thousand dollars.

[@GabrielVitor-kq6uj]

@@michaelhenzell2 Indeed, folks underestimate the E/F versions of the Gripen, and Embraer sure is an incredible company too.

[@yuri30027]

@Curupira Disse Curupira

[@diogoscheffer3476]

I think F35 is so expensive because it is a 5th generation fighter jet, Gripen 4.5

[@OscarMartinez-fn5pi]

It really makes me laugh to see comments about the Gippen NG and Brazil for the umpteenth time The Grippen NG is nothing more than a tweaked and slightly modernized version of the Grippen E for export If the grippen NG made its first flight in 2008, and the contract for the purchase of the 36 units of the Grippen NG by Brazil was signed in 2015, can you please explain to me how it is possible that Brazil/Embraer participated in the development of the plane? The purchase contract for the 36 Grippen units that the FAB has signed with Saab, indicates that the last 24 units will be ASSEMBLED, not manufactured, in Brazil. And that embraer will install part of the specific avionics for Brazil, so that the devices can operate with the arsenal that the FAB currently has, nothing more, the rest are your inventions The plane is entirely Swedish, just as the submarines it is manufacturing are a variant of the Scorpene that is of Spanish-French design. What must be attributed is the design and manufacture of the C-390... that one is Brazilian, the other is not Please do not make up data or news

[@Erik72Belanda]

The Royal Netherlands Air force just bought 4 kc390. This aircraft came out better than Hercules in every area.

[@bernardogouvea]

Portugal and Hungary already have kc390 also.

[@gabrielassumpcao6110]

Brazilian engineering

[@roydenijs7349]

They ordered 5 actually

[@lucasdm7707]

Brazil

[@manoelhenrique4360]

@@bernardogouvea already buyed*

[@FunYl]

KC 390 by far the best choice! But you know, lobby and politics...

[@lino222]

yeah, that's the reason why Brasil doesnt have the MBT Osório, it was better than the abrams, but...corruption happened!

[@Alone-ss9tq]

@@lino222 first that Osório was not developed for Brazil, it is for other countries.

[@lucasbhz]

@@Alone-ss9tq That's why you are alone. just talk shit all the time.

[@KOTAPA]

@@lino222 Urban legend in Portuguese.

[@lino222]

@@Alone-ss9tq when u don't know, stay quiet! Osório was made to be sold abroad, it also had a version with a diferent gun for Brasil, saudi arabia was evaluating several mbt's to place an order (Osório, abrams, amx40, challenger)...Osório was superior during the tests, they only chose the abrams due to back door deals. when i say Brasil doesn't have it, wasn't Engesa a Brasilian company? and if they had been sold internationally, Brasil would of bought them as well.

[@mecha3660]

The KC-390 was developed by Embraer together with the Brazilian Air Force, precisely to replace the C-130. It was an ambitious project that paid off, many nations operating the C-130 outside of the US have their eyes on it.

[@flavioc5389]

The Brazilian Air Force DIDN’T developed the KC-390, it just gave it’s requirements and EMB developed accordingly. The only important contribution from the Air Force was during flight test certification.

[@fband75]

Estão de olho mesmo! 👀✈️

[@s5d3819j]

​@@flavioc5389 well the money came from the air force so much so that the project could be better but as there was a lack of money the plane will not go further for that reason

[@mecha3660]

@@flavioc5389 Ok, Embraer woke up one day and said, look, let's build a competitor to the C-130, after all we have several closed buyers... we have all the operator know-how, we don't need anyone...

[@mecha3660]

@@flavioc5389 And each military equipment has its mission and application, I doubt that any military project of any nation that has the technology is not accompanied by them, let alone a project of this size.

[@alexpiox]

I liked the comparison, it convinced me to buy my KC 390 for the weekend trips!

[@guilhermefigueredo3366]

Kkkjk

[@ricardogurgel]

I'll do too

[@LuizFranciscoDias]

Cabo Frio waits for you and your family next carnival holyday

[@NACHOOFF]

Be careful, the change of oil and filter is very expensive.

[@pato-san3621]

@Curupira disse o curupira

[@davidbeattie4294]

The Herc is a brilliant 50's vintage aircraft with unparalleled versatility. Its a do everything aircraft. The KC-390 leverages modern high bi-pass turbofans and is showing major performance improvements over the Herc. Good show Brazil.

[@alanmoore2197]

Yes there are not from the same era at all - Yes the Herc was updated but only a little bit - its bones are ancient (and still pretty good)

[@Volesky1775]

Nope. The Hercules is one of the best and modern tactical Aircraft.

[@abergethirty]

Can the KC-390 land and take off short distances on rough unprepared surfaces?

[@davidbeattie4294]

I can't answer with any certainty but there is a C-390 vs C-130 comparison on KZbin. @@abergethirty

[@Josuénero6167]

​@@abergethirtyÉ a especialidade dele.

[@rafaeltardelle]

The immense superiority of the Embraer kc 390 in virtually every aspect is very clear. In addition to being beautiful, the plane is highly technological and offers the highest technology in world aviation. Unbeatable versatility, much higher specs put it at a level unbeatable today. A true masterpiece of aviation! 👏🏻✅🏆🥇

[@rubenildomarques1989]

Yes, this is because the KC390 is a modern project while the C130 is very old. But, these yakees are bad losers, they have sabotaged our projects in the past and continue to sabotage them, a great example of this sabotage was the Osório that destroyed the Abrams in a competition in Saudi Arabia. recently, the Yankees(Boing) wanted to buy Embraer, because they don't want competition. Otherwise they would have destroyed the Brazilian company.

[@tab529]

Why only few countries bought KC 390 if it is superior and cheaper than C130J

[@rubenildomarques1989]

@@tab529 Because of political pressure from the United States and also because the C130 is more affordable for used aircraft purchases.

[@mikelbrenn111]

The KC-390 is new and is superior in many ways compare to the A130 which is introduced decades ago and is quickly getting outdated in terms of performance and capacity.

[@AlaskaErik]

When the last KC-390 too old to fly anymore and is pulled from service, the C-130 will still be rolling off the assembly line.

[@josevitor1759]

as a Brazilian, Embraer's achievements make me so happy and proud! 🇧🇷❤

[@shrirangthakur]

Hope India 🇮🇳 selects C390 over C130j, it's a huge order of 60-80 aircraft.

[@Alan-in-Bama]

As you and your country should be… An excellent design and a great aircraft ! The C-130 family has been around for over 60 years… Lockheed needs to be working towards a Smaller version of the C-17 Globemaster… with twin turbofan engines.

[@9dejulho882]

beautiful bird, beautiful work of Brazilian aerial engineering, at an incredible lower cost.

[@PedroAugusto-gj8eq]

Obrigado amigo por gostar de nosso avião!🤝

[@RicardoBiglizzi]

Embraer has manufactured more than 8,000 aircraft since its founding. It is the world leader in the category up to 110 seats. It manufactures the Phaenon, Legacy jets, the E-190 family, the A-29 (military turboprop) and other beautiful and efficient planes. The K(King)C-390 is anything but a surprise when it comes to efficiency and performance. So much so that Boeing wanted to buy Embraer before the pandemic.

[@olivierfaber8478]

Netherlands ordered 5 kc390's last week instead of the Herc. Plan was to replace Herc by Hercs.But gov decided different second Nato member ( after Portugal)using this Millenium.

[@Arthur76180]

Actually third, Hungary bought some too

[@olivierfaber8478]

@@Arthur76180 Ur right !

[@MrTribalsun]

Portugal bought 5 KC-390 with one more unit of option at the end of the contract. you can see one of those 5 that Portugal ordered, already done.

[@1erwin79]

Lockheed won't be to sad; we also ordered more F-35's

[@MrG100000008]

Actually, the KC390 was partially built by NATO members. Therefore USA has nothing to complain about it.

[@leobenezneto]

A Holanda em seus estudos para a aquisição do KC-390 afirmou que quatro KC-390 podem fazer o trabalho de cinco C-130j com menor custo operacional.

[@SnakePliskin762]

390 looks a lot smaller than the herc weirdly,great feat of achievement by Brazil

[@xtuffman]

Ikr, I thought of that as well, but looking at the measurements, you see it's even bigger here and there.

[@Potatosaurusrex1]

It is. The video didn't address pallet postions or capacities etc lol

[@markoliver2368]

​@@Potatosaurusrex1 C390 Carries 7 tons more.

[@Truthbomb918]

A lot of C130 aircraft are the stretched version, I don't believe the c390 has a a Stretched version

[@juliocesarlimadossantoslim598]

Ele e menos para pousar em pista curta e irregular. E ele sendo menor,ainda ele tem mais capacidade de carga.

[@ulissesferreira5892]

Kc390 cargo plane is the future Hercules is old project

[@Relics_tv]

Have you seen the list of systems and capability the J has?

[@GabrielVitor-kq6uj]

@@Relics_tv have you seen the list of systems and capabilities the 390 has?

[@jeffstone7912]

Duh, the C-130 first introduced in 1956 or 1957. There is a reason why so many are still being sold. It Not because of nostalgia. I’m sure the KC 390 is an extremely good aircraft. Brazil has had a very good aircraft industry for a long time.

[@Alone-ss9tq]

@@Relics_tv dude don't pay attention to his comment, I'm Brazilian and I say many Brazilians think that only Brazilian equipment is good, and there were even some Brazilians thinking that the f39 flun could take down an f 22 raptor or an f 35.

[@Alone-ss9tq]

@@jeffstone7912 guy doesn't pay attention to his comment, many brazilians think that only their equipment is good

[@v1n1c1u55anto5]

according to the Dutch you need 5 Hercules to have the same flight hours disponibility of 4 kc-390 as It takes less and lesser expensive maintenance. So do the math.

[@leobenezneto]

The cost of flight hour and maintenance puts the KC-390 ahead of many competitors. Jet engines are the most reliable with more than 6,000 units already built with the lowest accident rates. that means reliability, availability and low operational cost.

[@wesleyboreli3052]

Resume: KC-390, much better!

[@sonnymagalhaes9203]

Embraer KC 390 is much better. Pressurization, comfort, less external noise, requires fewer operators, greater load capacity, greater speed, lower consumption, able to deliver any type of pallet, "sanitary", multifunctionality, lower price, lower operating cost and above all, it's new!

[@reginaalves3647]

Complexo de Vira- latas, Palhaço 🤡

[@sonnymagalhaes9203]

@Curupira Se ao menos conhecesse as diferenças não estaria falando besteiras. O KC-390 é multifuncional, mais silencioso, mais econômico, maior carga, maior rapidez, mais tecnológico, mais novo... e além disso, nem banheiro fechado o Hércules possui, otário. Vai estudar!

[@williansromansiqueira673]

@Curupira Drugs kids, dont do Drugs.

[@cspog149]

@Curupira Fumou uma do tamanho de um hércules mesmo

[@JWS-66]

and can used as a tanker....

[@alanspanicker]

I think kc390 is latest and better one since the other one is a turboprop

[@data_bank3535]

They both have there advantages

[@Relics_tv]

They both have advantages, thr bigger one is not realized is the Lockheed C130 series of aircraft even the J have a massive common part compatability. The huge amount of C130s in operation and numbers built over the last 60 years means it's cheaper and a well proven aircraft.

[@GabrielVitor-kq6uj]

@@Relics_tv No... it only means US has a very strong geopolitical power. The advantages of turboprop over turbofan engines, are the lower operation costs and resilience... but in this case the 390 actually has a lower acquisition/operational cost, needs less maintenances, while still boasting higher altitudes and flight speed as well as a hevier payload... Turbofans used to be very thirsty but they've became much more efficient nowdays.

[@Relics_tv]

@@GabrielVitor-kq6uj you're not wrong about that. The mission roles though are different which this video doesn't talk about. The C130J and the J-30 veriants are 'tactical' airlifters. Go into war zones and maneuver to deliver a payload. High altitude or lower. The KC-390 is more of a general airlifter like the C17 just smaller

[@GabrielVitor-kq6uj]

@@Relics_tv KC-390 is literally described as a medium-weight multi-role tactical transporter, not just and general airlifter... never seem any specialist telling otherwise, the capabillities the Super Hercules has, the Millenium also haves, except the fact that the Hercules can launch some precision ammunition, which I don't clearly understand the relevancy as the transporter will be always scolted in battlegrounds. But yes, it does have a handful of combat features the 390 lacks.

[@alesantos1974]

I saw the kc390 take off 600mts in less than 20 seconds, incredible!

[@samsmester7983]

Replacing the 500 C130 in operations with the KC390 will save $12,500 million dollars compared to new versions of C130 and the KC390 is way better plane than the C130. Will be interesting to see the maintenance cost of each plane. Of course that will never happen because a lot of people in the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin will loose their commission and Embraer do not have lobbyist in the Pentagon.

[@joaoborges1006]

I agree with you. Replacing the 500 C130 in operations with the KC390 will save $12,500 million dollars compared to new versions of C130 and the KC390 is way better plane than the C130.

[@leonardonogueira2647]

O kc390 usa motores dos Airbus a320,com certeza o custo manutenção dele é bem baixo

[@wallacemjr]

The maintenance of the C 390 is lower. In addition to being 2 against 4 engines, they are standard civil use engines. I think they are the ones used on the Airbus A 320.

[@Robert66734]

However the Herc is cheaper to operate. It burns a lot less fuel per mile flown compared to the the KC390. The engines are also cheaper to maintain. Turboprops will always be cheaper to operate and maintain compared to a turbofan engine. These costs will offset the higher price tag of the Herc. But in military terms I would also pick the KC390, not for its price tag but for its superior capabilities.

[@kekosam3]

@@Robert66734 Well... turboprops are cheaper to operate than jets, but you need to consider the cost of things you can't do, or spend more time to do, between both aircrafts. Look to civil airports. What do you see? More jets or turboprops? Jets had more economical viability than TP. Had more cost? Yes! But can do much more and that make jets the logical choice.

[@veigafer]

Uncomparable. The KC is clearly a superior choice.

[@ronpayne4505]

And exactly how much battle field experience does this aircraft have? This is where the winners and losers are determined, not on the spec sheets. I have flown Embraer products, in commercial operations, paved runway to paved runway, their is always some kind of digital glitch with these modern wonders. I can only imagine the problems this aircraft is going to experience operating in and out of unimproved air strips in the sand and dust, day in and day out. Once they do this, and prove they are worthy of a superior title, I’m all on board.

[@veigafer]

@@ronpayne4505 I guess you won't have to wait too long. The aircraft sales are picking up, and soon enough the C-130 will take its place in the history books.

[@_021_henderson5]

@@ronpayne4505 o Brasil já operou o kc 390 em pista de terra e barro, se eu não me engano no nordeste brasileiro é e sim muito superior ao 130 e não há discussão, o kc 390 já foi projetado especificamente para poder operar em pistas não pavimentadas barro, asfalta em péssimas condições dentre outros, não fale mal de algo que vc não conhece.

[@monesco]

hater @@ronpayne4505

[@abergethirty]

@@veigafer That won't be in our lifetime because they're dwarfed by current sales of C-130J's.

[@everaldosimoes1191]

Vem com nós para Brilhar no céu!!! 🇧🇷♥️🇧🇷👍

I understand that the subject of comparison on the video is the C-130J, but the original project is dated 1954 (first flight). As a brazillian, I really wish that on 2083 (68 years from now) the KC390 could be compared to an aircraft recently projected around that year. The C-130 did way more works than the mitology Hercules. From landing and taking off from an aircraft carrier (USS Forrestal "Look Ma... No Hook"), using rockets to shorten landing and take-off (Operation Credible Sport) to even fire howitzers from the sky (AC-130 "Spectre" and variations)... The Lockheed C-130 had an incredible curriculum vitae. Plus, the PT-6 engine is a really, really popular engine, that also have an incredible curriculum, with the first run dated as far as 1960. I really hope that the IAE V2500 have a long life and easy maintenance at around 2083. What I'm saying is that the KC-390 is an astounding aircraft, really suited to our era, but it isn't fair to compare it with the C-130 (I'm not really sure that is OK to say it's in its final years. We'll talk again in 20 years or so). What I CAN say is... Welcome KC-390, and work together with your "older brother". Learn "his" lessons and grow strong. Together... as allies.

[@Edsoncamargos]

of course, new technologies always replace old ones !

@@Edsoncamargos sometimes not. Sometimes new technologies brings... new problems that need long time to be solved (and new costs). But I agree that there's always place to improve. As an example, the need to replace the A-10 on Afghanistan. The solution was to use the A-29 that is a relative "old" technology (propeller aircraft used for ground attack missions). I'm not saying about the sensors and displays, but the platform itself.

[@AlaskaErik]

The C-130 never had a PT-6 engine. That engine is used on much smaller aircraft.

[@eliasb8]

I think that you are mistaken. I believe that it is a fair comparison since the C-130 is the plane that the KC390 was designed to replace. The Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules and the Airbus A400M Atlas are today's direct competitors to the Embraer C390 Millennium. In fact, there are several countries that are making this exact comparison. India is, at this very moment, evaluating the C390 in comparison with the C-130J and the A400M. The C390 has recently won the competition with these two planes in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. The C-130J is a very recent plane that was completely modernized to compete in today's market. It now has sophisticated avionics and they even replaced the aging 1970's Allison T56-A-15 turboprop engine with a more modern engine. It now has the very capable Rolls-Royce AE2100D3 turboprop engine. It continues to this day to be manufactured by the largest military contractor in the world. If nothing else, the political cloud that Lockheed Martin has is not to be underestimated. It won't matter, though! The Embraer C390 Millennium is such a good plane that no one can beat it. Only political dealings under-the-table can stop the C390 from being selected as the de-facto successor to the legendary C-130.

[@bondgabebond4907]

@@Edsoncamargos You are so right, so correct, so absolutely the smartest person in the world, except for a couple of fatal flaws, soon to be three fatal flaws. The B-52 bomber, the F-15 fighter jet and the C-130 cargo transport. What you see is that soon the B-52 will be 100 years old. It will have a pilot who's father flew this bomber and even a grandfather who flew this beast. Sometimes the new doesn't replace the old. Many newer aircraft have already been retired, but the old keep on keeping on. On the positive side, a lot of new technology has been employed in these 'old' aircraft.

[@renepinos3236]

Many thanks for the comparison. The Austrian Airforce ordered recently 4 units of the C-390 to replace their aged C-130K's.

[@paulor9577]

It’s all about the operating costs! Embraer is the winner by far!

[@nojusticenopeace8717]

The truly history behind the "world aviation" isn't what the Americans told you guys!!! The first man to create an airplane ✈️ in our history of Aviation, was the Legendary Brazilian called... "Alberto Santos - Dumont", known as "Santos - Dumont"... the Creator of "14 Bis" the first aircraft ever made!!! > "Ozires da Silva" creator of Embraer, is just giving us the continuation of that!!!! Search and you will be amazed by that!!!!

[@EvaldoJunior-un7ct]

Sou brasileiro isso é verdade

[@washingtonluizvinturini]

Ótimo trabalho. Outros itens que devem ser considerados são o custo de manutenção e disponibilidade operacional. Certamente o custo de manutenção do Kc 390 será menor e a disponibilidade será maior em função da diferença de idade dos projetos das duas aeronaves. Cada um no seu tempo.

[@leobenezneto]

esses critérios são muito importantes

[@lino222]

...e começa logo com o custo dos aviões, o KC-390 é superior em todos os aspectos e custa 50 milhões contra os 75 milhões do C-130... com 150 milhões compra-se 2 C-130 ou 3 KC's.

[@drinksnapple8997]

Tabralho de mierda. Comparaciones incorectas tomando en cuenta que la mayoria de los 130J son el modelo J-30 y cuesta menos (gracias a los grandes numeros de venta para la USAF).

[@emmanuelcampos4764]

No futuro a manutenção será só elétrica vão precisar de eletricistas e técnicos em eletrônica

[@Lucas-jc6hv]

negativo tio, ac130 é um avião antigo ja estabelecido no mercado, apesar de amar o kc390, o 130 ainda tem suas vantagens, o mercado não funciona dessa sua forma ai.

[@Mr67Stanger]

You can onle expect the best from Embraer, one of the world's most important aerospace companies.

[@jeter1971]

C130 75 million , KC 390 50 million 😳

[@joaoborges1006]

Embraer KC 390 is MUUCH better. Of course, as a Brazilian citizen, I am supect to say hahaha. Peace out.

[@Alone-ss9tq]

@Parsha Venkata Shiva sai why offend the person

[@Alone-ss9tq]

@Parsha Venkata Shiva sai I understand, and I agree with what you've done, we need more people like that.

[@lucasalexandre3767]

Yeah, we may be a bit biased to speak about the theme 😂

[@nathanieldijkerman7731]

Netherlands and belgium are going to buy the c390

[@solangesouza6277]

The BRAZILIAN KC 390 is a ABSOLUTELY STUNNING AIRCRAFT, in Aerodynamic performance, in design and it is unique in its category of cargo because it can land and takeoff from short runways ! I am sure will be one the best selling Cargo Airplanes around the Globe in a short period of time. ! EMBRAER the pride of Brazilians ! 😊🇧🇷

[@thestrategist100]

India is also evaluaating the C390 Millenium. Seems like a very capable aircraft

[@hmideias]

This 390 is very beautiful...

[@r.guerreiro140]

As almost all Embraer planes

[@dallasyap3064]

Perhaps its time for the US to consider buying this plane instead

[@AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc]

Looks like the Herc has finally met its match. Not bad after a half century. Go Embraer.

[@mecaborg]

You missed one huge point: the KC390 takes off and lands on small runways. It’s astonishing.

[@the1juan2]

Same with the herc

[@iampsico]

@@the1juan2 The point is that jet cargos usually don't. They are more capable, as the 390, but they usually can't. Not at the difficulty level the 390 does, at least.

[@GilsonJr.Whitout.Numbers]

I am Brazilian. Super fan of Hercules!! I confess that the C390 surprised me a lot! And if you've already seen how it looks configured for transporting entourages... By simply placing a few seat and upholstery modules, the interior looks like a civil aircraft.

[@christopherloh936]

KC 390 wins hands down in performance & price no brainer which to buy.

[@paulomatheus_]

The C-130 was made in a time that airplanes was design using papers and rulers and C-390 was design using the computer, it is the actual way. Just by that we can assume the C-390 is better design and is a better fit for modern era.

[@fernandocasotti9857]

O KC-390 é o futuro para os cargueiros

[@silasramosCCB]

@Curupira Sempre tem um vira latas Brasileiro, típico.

[@silasramosCCB]

@Curupira Kkkk, mas devia torcer mais com nosso avião, poxa, os Americanos babando e você denegrindo, boa noite.

[@silasramosCCB]

@Curupira Kkk, eu imaginei, ganhou até um coração do canal kkkkk, mudei meu conceito com você kkkk.

[@goncalosbmouta]

Adoro o KC e é a aeronave de escolha para o tipo de missoes portuguesas mas a falta de capacidade para aterrar em pistas rurais ou improvisadas n deixa de ser uma preocupação

[@jacksonschneider1293]

@@silasramosCCB ele é o Fábio C

[@reanbootsma913]

Please also add comparison of take-off and landing distance.

[@robertconway6455]

Mission requirements should be be addressed.

[@iridium58]

Yea, they miss that critical info, I bet the Hercules can takeoff and land in shorter distances...if the Hercules covers all the bases and needs for the US military now, why change it....

[@Rafaelrki]

@@iridium58 the kc 390 is designed to take off and land on short runways. and design of the Kc390 for use in the Amazon rainforest with small and poorly structured airports

[@raphaelrodrigues1645]

Well, considering that the whole point of the KC-390's design was do EVERYTHING the C-130 does, but in a better way, that information would be pointless. The KC-390 was designed and built to be a better C-130

[@mauriciodenardipeterlevitz3694]

Much of the history of our world was transported by Hercules planes. Only proud and respect for this plane. The baton was passed to a more modern airplane now. Welcome kc390 millennium.

[@viniciuscosta01]

The Embraer plane is shorter, faster, carries more cargo and longer ranger. No brainer

[@Matheus-hm9kb]

It isn't shorter than c130

[@lino222]

@@Matheus-hm9kb maybe he means take off and landing, the KC needs much less runway.

[@caiocabral6750]

O KC-390 Millenium não é menor, é apenas o ângulo da foto que deu essa impressão.

[@windlive04]

Embraer KC-390 is powered by " IAE’s V2500 " the same engines that provided propulsion for the world’s leader single aisle commercial passenger aircraft Airbus A-320, all over the world have A-320s landing and taking off in every minute, the engine is well known, cheaper maintenance, reliable, many parts available!

[@raphaelrodrigues1645]

And also, it has just two of them, not four, like the Hercules

[@flavio-saopaulo9326]

They are excellent aircraft, but the Brazilian project seems to me to be the best cost-benefit in the world for this type of aircraft.

[@rthjong]

Great aircraft kc390! And low cost too.

[@RicardoBiglizzi]

KingC-390 -> Made in The Home of Santos Dumont... The King anda the first Man to fly in this World

[@clauande]

KC-390 is the best medium size transport aircraft, at the best cost!

[@User-237gogo]

C130J is not comparable with KC390 Millennium at all. Aviation range, take off weight, speed, even price tag. Any body wants to buy KC390 Millennium.

[@john210869]

Kc390 is the best....

[@cromo7743]

This is not a comparison, this is devastation.

[@jackwaau]

If the C-130J-30 was the comparison. It would be a different story with 8 pallets or 128 combat troops, or 92 paratroopers.

[@marciliotomich5242]

The Hercules boasts those nice chacteristics of the great planes in history: longevity, versatility, ruggedness, safe, among others. I see it more like an end of a beautiful era and a new beginning. It's a King replacing another King

[@pathologyiscool]

Wow, no comparison! Embraer KC 390 is the winner hands down.

[@hamiltonsouza9573]

The KC390 is a better Joyce …. Better price, better performance ….

[@AndreCarneiro666]

The C-130 is legendary! But, is a too old project(even with the updates) and the maintenance is too high mainly because it has 4 engines! The fact is KC-390 deliver more eficience for a lower acquisition and maintenance cost.

[@zerokaizen]

they both are grat planes XD please on the next compare astros 2020 x himars, valeu meu amigo, belo video!

[@ricardoprado6250]

Embraer is AWSOME!

[@JoaoPedro-qm2nc]

I'm Brazilian and I felt very proud after watching your video.

[@Pedro.Lustosa]

🇧🇷 Embraer was born from the Brazilian MIT (Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica - ITA), the best engineering school in Brazil. It was really challenging to earn my BSc in Electronic Engineering there.

[@eddiesantos4978]

Era só deixar a cachaça e a vagabundagem de lado e estudar mais

[@ivobatista4013]

Definitivamente el KC390 Y la mejor opción

[@luizinhocaron1586]

Great planes!

[@ambathurmagesh7453]

why you skipped the main part....price of 390 is around 60million usd which is half the price of c130j ie around 130million usd.

[@joaoborges1006]

Good one.

[@ambathurmagesh7453]

@@joaoborges1006 thanks bro😍

[@brunodias84]

but portugal buy 5 for 800 millions, 60x5 isnt 800

[@leonardofelberg7113]

Vou te responder em português, Portugal comprou fora os kc 390 foi o treinamento das equipes de operação do avião e as peças de reposição fora que o contrato prevê a abertura de uma filial da Embraer para a manutenção em solo português

[@ambathurmagesh7453]

@@leonardofelberg7113 do you know english ??????

[@Adhenauer]

A vantagem que tem o C-130 é que é feito nos EUA, tem a proteção comercial, quase um monopólio por terem muitos países o usando e é um bom cargueiro militar. Por outro lado o C-390 é um projeto mais moderno com maior eficiência que o concorrente e pode usar qualquer tipo de pista levantado vôo ou pousando em pistas curtas e tem maior raio de ação e comporta mais carga. Se o KC-390 tivesse sido criado nos EUA ou na Europa , com o poder de persuasão deles, já teria chegado em encomendas a perto de 200 unidades.

[@sepoloravla2273]

no aspecto do lobby comercial, aquele acordo que foi cancelado entre embraer e boeing, ajudaria muito na venda do aviao brasileiro inclusive nos mesmos eeuu

[@Adhenauer]

@@sepoloravla2273 Com certeza!

[@dolydoly5679]

@@sepoloravla2273 e nos vender? Levariamos o nome de USA não Brasil. Gosto assim: EMPRESA BRASILEIRA

[@sepoloravla2273]

@@dolydoly5679 tambem gosto mas fatos sao fatos. o acordo com a boeing nao anularia a participaçao da embraer na nova empresa. eu so tenho a dizer-lhe que torça para que a embraer encontre uma alternativa ao crescente avanço da airbus em seu principal nicho, o de aeonaves regionais, pois seus antigos clientes a estao trocando pela europeia. embraer é um anao comparado a airbus e um acordo bem alinhavado com a boeing poderia blinda-la do forte poder do lobby da airbus junto as companhias aereas

[@osmarfgf]

​@@sepoloravla2273 Esse acordo acabaria como a Ford com a Troller, a boeing ia sugar as tecnologias que lhe interessassem, iria levar os melhores engenheiros e centros de pesquisa para os EUA e logo logo a EMBRAER iria definhar ou virar mera montadora (sem nenhum desenvolvimento de tecnologia ou pesquisa) isso se não fosse extinta.

[@takenbythewindNdrivenbythesea]

It’s time for the Brazilian to shine 🇧🇷 ☀️

[@axeman3d]

I think the cockpit windows are what make the Herc look bigger and the KC look smaller. The greenhouse on the Herc and the massive panes on the KC fool the eye.

[@OSTTIMELAPSENikolasKepler]

good analysis about it

[@ostilius]

Resume: c-130j = Past, Kc-390= Future. Only.

[@singel09]

Love the fact there is competition and so cool the RNLAF bought 5. Let’s see if the 390 can build an as impressive track record as the 130.

[@maiconlima257]

Obviamente o nosso KC-390 é muito melhor. Não há comparações. Em matéria de aviação, somos os melhores. Aliás, nós brasileiros, somos os inventores do avião.

[@teleintel]

Não! Os irmãos Wright voaram antes, em 1903, com bom controle do avião. Eu também gostaria que fossemos nós os pioneiros. S. Dumont foi também um pesquisador e construtor de "mais pesado do que o ar",.................mas não voou primeiro e quando voou, em 1906, foi um voo de galinha...

[@Dani-kv1xx]

@@teleintel FOI UM BRASIL BRASILEIRO SIMM!!! NINGUÉM NUNCAAA VIU OS IRMÃOS NORTE AMERICANOSS VOAR!!!!! O BRASILEIRO VIRAM!!!! 🇧🇷🇧🇷👍

[@synfith2493]

@@teleintel com catapulta ate merda voa

[@teleintel]

@@synfith2493 A catapulta somente substitui uma corrida na pista. Logo eles colocaram rodas e decolaram na corrida...

[@dolydoly5679]

@@teleintel só uma meia dúzia de testemunhas e uma foto borrada. Santos voou na França em um espetáculo aberto e com mais de 2 mil testemunhas. Quer mais? O 14 Bis não precisou de trilhos ou de uma colina como o modelo do Wright, ele voou direto do chão com um motor. Além do fato do primeiro avião a ser comercializado foi o Deimoselle um projeto do nosso brasileiro! O criador do avião é Santos Dumont! E o que você chama de voo de galinha foi mais duradouro e mais alto do que a catapulta dos Wright

[@profeluisegarcia]

Embraer: we latin america people are very proud of you¡

[@tomnewey930]

Tactical landing and takeoff distances are important in comparisons

[@patrao84]

The KC390 is capable of taking off from a 600 meter runway

[@rodrigobarreto1947]

that can be offset with rocket boosters, like ina C130J, can it not?

[@guilhermebraga1603]

O KC é superior, não há duvidas.

[@sovouvoando]

E mais barato também

[@wilsong7474]

no comments ! Embraer KC 390 wins in everything !!!

[@syedputra5955]

If kc 390 can be reconfigured as a passenger aircraft for rough landing strips, that would be super

[@jimhamilton4074]

The Embraer KC-390 is an underrated work horse! I'd like to see a version with counter rotating electric prop engines powered by hydrogen fuel cell generators!

[@SpringhillInvest]

Two different generations of aircrafts, even though the C130 has the same purpose, the KC390 is technological newer. This comparison is like to compare a 1960's Wolkswagen Bugg to one produced in 2010 which had Audi parts.

[@einundsiebenziger5488]

Two generations of aircraft* (plural same as singular) / technologically* newer (a given being sixty years younger)

[@EDUARDO--.-..]

The KC-390 was developed by Embraer,,,,,the best company in the world

[@alvarodeoliveira9246]

Congratulations on the excellent video providing a lot of important information.

[@brwnovsky]

There is no comparison, Embraer is better and cheaper in every aspect.

[@j.tin23]

It looks Embraer has hit the bullseye with this modern aircraft!!!

[@serafinacosta7118]

So the brain thrust at Embraer , a company that already supplied planes for the Brazilian Armed Forces , took a hard look at the combined Hercules fleet outside the US/ Canada/UK/Australia. And while at it, they figured they had a decent replacement addressable market. Not a huge runaway in orders from the get go, but the type of investment in R&D and manufacturing that will pay dividends over the long term. By just building a better aircraft. And eating up in from the fringes with a better price point. Not a sexy market, but this is a bet that helps them to fill their order books. That is very smart of them. Taking on an American DoD supplier that is very complacent with their fat order book at home. Kudos for their forward thinking.

[@robertadams8081]

The hercules is old hat now and i think your video shows that the KC 390 is by far the best aircraft i bet the americans don't buy it also there's only so many upgrades you can do to an old 1950s designed aircraft.

[@bundywaters5988]

Embraer made a nice aircraft here but the fanboys are insufferable.

[@Mathewszinho]

Haha, I agree with you. I don't understand how a simple military aircraft has so many fans around the world. It's just a plane 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@eddiesantos4978]

Antiamericanism

[@hubert100100]

Embraer KC 390, of course! 🤗🤗🤗

[@clking1938]

kc390 👍👍

[@patrickpayne]

Am from NZ and am still wondering why we went for the Hercules C-130j instead of the KC-390. Wrote to our Minister of Defence and am still waiting for a reply.

[@PauloHenrique-fq4hx]

O Brasil não tem a diplomacia e o poder dos EUA. O KC-390 e superior em todos os aspectos incluindo custos. Se o KC-390 fosse americano já teria sido vendido ao mundo todo!

[@Pixelarter]

Probably mostly politics.

[@patrickpayne]

@@Pixelarter Yes often they will go for a supplier based on allegiances and interoperation abilities. In every way the Embraer beats the c130J.

[@marcotulioramosrezende8112]

because of the lobbyists

[@simeao1979]

Politics!

[@tube.brasil]

This situation clealry shows the power of lobby and government pressure from the US government.

[@larrymiller2727]

It's a very convincing comparison, when the United States are wanting the best in military aircraft this one needs to be closely looked at.

[@tahirjadoon1]

I am C130 E Loadmaster, i think C390 seems better, except Low level tactical missions. Turbo props are much better at LLT.

[@paularijit123]

KC much better

[@manuelsilva-cc9xx]

Parabéns Embraer ótima aeronave

[@sambanthamkarunakaran360]

KC 390 is the best choice

[@celio973]

Kc 390 é lógico. Bela aeronave Tupiniquim. Orgulho nacional. Parabéns EMBRAER pela competência, alta tecnologia e belo designer visual. Um Rolls Royce dos céus.

[@gabrielassumpcao6110]

Brazilian engineering 🇧🇷😌

[@rogerhowell6269]

KC390, has the Edge over the C130 in range, payload, cargo and speed! 🤔👍👍😃

[@CarlosAlberto-bu3ep]

KC 390 ✈️EMBRAER 🇧🇷 very good

[@citylimits8927]

There may be some applications where there is no substitute for 4 engines, but the Embraer is still an impressive aircraft!

[@vachan7069]

Power comparision is not on same unit of measure

[@kekosam3]

Yes, really. But is the same thing to compare oranges and apples.

[@lucasinacio0073]

O kc-390 passou na minha cidade ontem porto velho Zeus55

[@joaoborges1006]

Sério? Sou de RO tb, queria mt poder ter visto ;/

[@aliadoviking4645]

Moro em Santa Maria segunda cidade que mais tem quartéis no Brasil e primeira cidade do país com maior número de blindados, então acredito que logo vou avistar um Kc 390 no céu da minha cidade 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷...

[@leandrocardoso2983]

Kc390 por superioridade ! Hércules por obrigação!