Conducting an Aerial Survey | 4 steps to capture precise RGB & LiDAR data

[@GeelongCableLocations]

👌👌👌👌 Mate, the production level of these videos just keep getting better!!! And I love that you not only have the details in the video but also step by step breakdown in the description, seriously, well done guys.

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Glad you find it useful. We will put together more detailed video's of the flight planning and processing stages.... there's a lot going on!

[@g1998k]

Great video. Would be nice to see some of that post-processing work.

[@philipengle8835]

Nice informative video. Well done. Question about taking your GCP‘s. It looks like you did not use the RTK on the M300. Is that because you were not in an area that you could access a net work?

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Mangoesmapping default to PPK workflows, regardless of location, due to the lower positional uncertainty associated with PPK compared with RTK surveys. It's something of a personal choice. Some people prefer RTK surveys, so they get realtime feedback regarding fix vs float, however on the sites we work, we're never had a problem getting fix with our PPK workflow. In remote locations where RTK is desirable, Emlid have a clever feature called 'Local NTRIP'. Cameron Baker does a good job describing how this can be used in conjunction with a DJI M300 here: community.emlid.com/t/m300-rs2-local-ntrip/31770

[@XdekHckr]

can you explain why some people use free rtk services and other people use their own rtk ground stations? What's the difference when making maps like photogrammetry? Is it needed to use your own rtk when making lidar data and not needed at all when making plain maps?

[@MangoesmappingAU]

If you have cellular coverage and the mount point is close enough - you can use NTRIP services (paid or free). Use a base station if you are in a remote area for RTK - or you want to use a static log from the base for post processing (a PPK workflow). Neither or these workflows are specific to lidar or photogrammetry data collection.

[@alistairhart9908]

It's also worth noting that the distance between the RTK base station (or CORS station, when using an NTRIP correction) is correlated to the precision of your observations. Short baselines (ie. from your own base station setup within just a few miles) will deliver better results than when depending on an NTRIP base 20-30 miles away. Degradation of precision is non-linear, so baselines below 1-3 miles won't be too different to even shorter baselines, however as you extend that baseline out, you can expect increasingly larger degradation of your RTK GNSS observations.

[@kizzjd9578]

Whats the module below the remote controller?

[@MangoesmappingAU]

That's a dongle that allows a SIM card to be connected to the controller. This allows the controller to connect to the internet - useful if you are doing RTK workflows.

[@2252ryan]

Good day Mate! Ed here from Central CA reaching out with a Q for you. First of all thank you for this video. Very informative. Well done in presenting it as well. My Q is as follows. Could you have used the DJI D-RTK2 to do what you did instead of the Emlid Reach RS2+? Thank you!

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Thanks for your question Edmond, We do not have direct experience with the D-RTK2 base station from DJI, however we see from our client list (including major national DJI retailers) that the Emlid RS2+ is a popular and more versatile alternative. Feedback from our customers indicate that to collect GCP coordinates with a D-RTK2 is really inefficient and impractical for the following reasons: 1. You need to use your Phantom controller as your field data collector (in mode 3?) 2. Using local corrections from a 2nd D-RTK2 base uses Occusync to broadcast the RTCM corrections from base to rover, with a ground to ground range of around 1km (effectively line of sight and variable based on local conditions - in some occasions this may be longer), based on feedback from experienced users. 3. Using an Emlid receiver as a base outside of mobile coverage (as is often the case here in Australia...) would require the user to broadcast the correction via wifi from the Emlid GNSS receiver to the DJI controller, which is also used to collect the GCP coordinates from the D-RTK2 rover. Therefore, this is impractical 4. Using NTRIP, a user can consume a correction from a D-RTK2 base or from an Emlid GNSS receiver (ie. using the free Emlid Caster), and with a SIM card in both the base station and the DJI controller. 5. The poor construction of the tripod, and lack of support for datums other than WGS84 render this workflow inoperable for most surveyors. As a consequence, the majority of our DJI customers do not even purchase the D-RTK2 base, and instead purchase 2 Emlid RS2+ receivers - 1 to use as a base, and one as a rover. This is a proven, cost effective and versatile solution. In the case that you operate exclusively in mobile areas with a good CORS network, you would only require 1 RS2+ that can be used as the base during aerial surveys, to provide a RINEX file with a short baseline, and also as a rover, to coordinate your GCP's. Keep in mind that when using GNSS RTK, there is a non linear (compounding) error associated with the length of baseline between your base and rover. In an ideal world, you would keep this under a couple of km's, but of course you can stretch this out depending on the level of precision your client requires. In such a circumstance where high precision is required, I would recommend establishing an Emlid base over a known survey mark, rather than depending on a distant CORS reference station.You can then use Emlid Caster (or Emlid's local NTRIP over wifi) to broadcast a correction from your Emlid base to your drone controller.

[@2252ryan]

@@MangoesmappingAU Thank you VERY much for the in-depth response! Makes good sense and I will take your advice and just go with the RS2+

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Emlid have tutorials and very supportive user base via their forum, community.emlid.com/

[@2252ryan]

@@MangoesmappingAU Good to know. Thanks a million once again. Blessings to all your endeavors.

[@echelon-thepanamanian_papi6144]

What software do you use, I am interested in starting my drone business and the dji matrice 300k

[@MangoesmappingAU]

What sort of work are you hoping to do? Photogrammetry? Lidar capture? Emlid have some handy tutorials on their site for getting set up for precise aerial surveys using Emlid Reach GNSS receivers docs.emlid.com/reachrs2/tutorials/integration/dji-rtk/

[@buggerzn]

do you have a training for new M300 users

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Hi Jerusha. Were you wanting training to fly the M300 or training for conducting aerial surveys? We do not provide flight training or licensing - but could assist with survey training if this is required.

[@NathanAlo-sy1ls]

I like this software application....really interesting

[@MangoesmappingAU]

Thanks Nathan

[@slightlydelic1407]

Beats doing a topo one shot at a time. I'd love for my company to get a drone for some of these ugly topography jobs we get.

[@MangoesmappingAU]

It is incredible. In the scheme of things, the purchase costs of an RTK drone are negligible but you must be prepared to pay the second price! The price of time to learn and implement a workflow. If your landscapes are clear of vegetation then aerial photogrammetry may be an excellent way to get the data you need. Take a look at the Mavic 3 Enterprise with RTK www.mangoesmapping.com.au/products/dji-aerial-survey/dji-mavic-3-enterprise-series/ . If you want to move up to LiDAR capture then take a close look at the M300 (which is about to be replaced by the M350) www.mangoesmapping.com.au/products/dji-aerial-survey/dji-matrice-300/.