Constitutional Interpretations of FEDERALISM [AP Gov Review Unit 1 Topic 8]

  Рет қаралды 109,710

Heimler's History

Heimler's History

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 26
@Emilythesquishy
@Emilythesquishy 3 жыл бұрын
i’ve been here since heimler had 20k. now he has 200k and has helped me get a 5 on my ap world exam and now i’m studying ap gov with him 💗
@saakshibharadwaj395
@saakshibharadwaj395 3 жыл бұрын
omg emily sameeee
@Emilythesquishy
@Emilythesquishy 3 жыл бұрын
@@saakshibharadwaj395 AYYY
@Emilythesquishy
@Emilythesquishy 3 жыл бұрын
@@saakshibharadwaj395 lol we have an frq tomorrow ✊🏻✊🏻
@saakshibharadwaj395
@saakshibharadwaj395 3 жыл бұрын
@@Emilythesquishy yeah saw this now. it wasn't too bad I guess.
@arnavgupta8590
@arnavgupta8590 3 жыл бұрын
quick addition: lopez argued that if the mere posession of an object can be regulated by the commerce clause, then that leads to theoretical infinite power. thats why supreme court checked congress power with a (5-4) for lopez
@andrev71us
@andrev71us 7 ай бұрын
What a fantastic lecture, Heimler, I loved it!
@nicksabanthegoat4443
@nicksabanthegoat4443 3 жыл бұрын
“Weaaaaaaak sauccccccce”🤣🤣🤣Learning and Laughing…great content
@heimlershistory
@heimlershistory 3 жыл бұрын
So weak…
@faithmanchester6581
@faithmanchester6581 Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤ thank you so much. I am a senior so this is probably the last time I watch your videos so thank you for helping me pass my ap exams, your amazing, thank you ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@armandoperez8761
@armandoperez8761 3 жыл бұрын
this IS SO PERFECT. i am learning this on tuesday and youre literally going ahead of us by at least two units and ITS PERFECT to follow easily
@BlessedwithFavor
@BlessedwithFavor Жыл бұрын
YelP!
@FollowerofDuck
@FollowerofDuck 2 жыл бұрын
this man helped me get a 4 on my apush exam yall
@illuminatingnight6928
@illuminatingnight6928 4 ай бұрын
thanks for this video heimler
@IillyMacdovers-cc6ob
@IillyMacdovers-cc6ob Жыл бұрын
Between and afterward I could then enforce the appropriate nature of seeing a name in front of each one of us as part of Devin's
@mizzlethyself
@mizzlethyself 7 ай бұрын
Please elaborate why is this not the precedent for 2A rights @3:20 @fourboxesdiner
@BlessedwithFavor
@BlessedwithFavor Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this TRUTH.
@Stew2498
@Stew2498 Жыл бұрын
Awesome thank you
@alexpiscitelli2187
@alexpiscitelli2187 3 жыл бұрын
i love you
@tobijames4698
@tobijames4698 3 жыл бұрын
POV: ur studying for Mr. Cole's Federalism test tomorrow
@TheTechZombie
@TheTechZombie 3 жыл бұрын
I know that you try to keep these short and snappy, which I appreciate as a teacher who sometimes uses your videos, but I think you miss a lot of context about just how the Lopez decision fits into the overall trend of the shifts in the balance between the Federal government and the states. You mention McCulloch v Maryland, which no doubt was the largest shift in the balance of the federal government of its time, but in a pragmatic sense, McCulloch didn't really change much. It was a large precedent that served as the foundation for many other cases, but the majority of governmental power still squarely resided with the states even long after McCulloch. It wasn't until the New Deal era that the shift towards the dominance of the federal government really starts to take hold. While there are many cases that slowly shift this power, I think the case that gives the most context (particularly for the Lopez decision) is the case of Wickard v Filburn. This case expanded the interpretation of the Commerce Clause (the foundation of the Lopez decision) to nearly incorporate every action the federal government could conceivably do. This was the debate in the Lopez decision. Could something as wholly unconnected to commerce as gun control in schools be reasonably granted as a power under the commerce clause? The Supreme Court said no, which put a limit on the commerce clause that had been growing to incorporate just about every policy of the federal government. I think this context is really lacking in explaining the importance of the Lopez decision. I love your videos and I know Wickard isn't a required case in the AP's eyes, but quickly explaining it in between the McCulloch and the Lopez explanations would add so much to the conversation about federalism. Either way, awesome videos, keep up the great work!
@heimlershistory
@heimlershistory 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed on all counts. I leave a TON out of these videos, and I wouldn’t be offended in the SLIGHTEST if you told your students so. In these videos I’m literally just going through the CED and reproducing what they say there (although hopefully more entertaining). I go way more in depth with my own students. Sounds like your students have a good teacher, and I’m glad for them.
@니모-b6w
@니모-b6w 5 ай бұрын
Jones Sandra Jackson Matthew Young Michael
@bridgettef2601
@bridgettef2601 Жыл бұрын
You give me a headache
@madisonforest2704
@madisonforest2704 Жыл бұрын
Then don’t watch lol
@swans444
@swans444 9 ай бұрын
womp womp
FEDERALISM in ACTION [AP Gov Review Unit 1 Topic 9 (1.9)]
4:16
Heimler's History
Рет қаралды 86 М.
McCulloch v Maryland, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]
3:55
Heimler's History
Рет қаралды 454 М.
Mom Hack for Cooking Solo with a Little One! 🍳👶
00:15
5-Minute Crafts HOUSE
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
СИНИЙ ИНЕЙ УЖЕ ВЫШЕЛ!❄️
01:01
DO$HIK
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
人是不能做到吗?#火影忍者 #家人  #佐助
00:20
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
27 Amendments Walkthrough | Constitution 101
23:30
National Constitution Center
Рет қаралды 344 М.
Federalism: Crash Course Government and Politics #4
9:15
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
AP Government UNIT 1 REVIEW [Everything You NEED to Know!]
25:51
Heimler's History
Рет қаралды 835 М.
The 14th Amendment | Constitution 101
15:24
National Constitution Center
Рет қаралды 403 М.
The U.S. Constitution, EXPLAINED [AP Government Required Documents]
7:41
Heimler's History
Рет қаралды 315 М.
Marbury v. Madison, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]
6:05
Heimler's History
Рет қаралды 415 М.
The Original Intent of the Constitution | Myths of American History
31:55
The Great Courses
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
The United States v. Lopez, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]
4:12
Mom Hack for Cooking Solo with a Little One! 🍳👶
00:15
5-Minute Crafts HOUSE
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН