27 Amendments Walkthrough | Constitution 101

[@AlmerCraft]

This should be on billboards everyday.Thanks for sharing.

[@AntoineWilliams7118]

Selling prescriptions and sports betting makes more money though.

[@ochrechap]

0:19 Article 5: Proposal and Ratification 0:24 Proposal 1:01 Ratification 1:39 Constitutional Reform: 4 periods Here are the 4 periods: 2:16 (A) FOUNDING ERA (1st period of reform) ⬇️ 2:24 Bill of Rights (under Founding Era) ⬇️ BILL OF RIGHTS = First 10 Ammendments 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸 2:38 Rights of Conscience (1st Ammendment) 4:26 Military (2nd Ammendment): Safety of citizens and the right to keep arms. 4:57 Military (3rd Ammendment): Right to domicialiary military exclusion. 5:20 Privacy and Property (4th Ammendment): a) Right to be secure against unreasonable searches/seizures b) No warrant issue without probable cause 6:05 Privacy and Property (5th Ammendment): No taking of property without compensation 6:30 Fair Process, Jury Rights, Rights of the accused (5th Ammendment): (a) Right to remain silent (b) Right against self-incrimination (c) Right against double jeopardy (d) Right to grand-jury for capital crimes (e) Right to due process of law 7:20 Fair Process, Jury Rights, Rights of the accused (6th Ammendment): Pertains to crininal cases - (a) Right to jury (b) Right to counsel (c) Right to speedy and public trial (d) Right to be informed of accused trial (e) Right to compel & cross-examine witnesses 8:13 Fair Process, Jury Rights, Rights of the accused (7th Ammendment): Pertains to civil right to jury trial 8:30 Fair Process, Jury Rights, Rights of the accused (8th Ammendment): Protection against excessive punishment, trials and fines 8:56 Popular Soverignty Ammendments (9th Ammendment): Right to the recognition of God-given rights are more than can be written down. 09:51: Popular Soverignty Ammendments (10th Ammendment): There should be a balance of power between the people/state and the goverment. That concludes the first 10 ammendments 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸

[@adddriiiisaaaa5840]

Wow 🤩 thank you so much

[@Aoekin]

Godsend thank you lol

[@ochrechap]

@@adddriiiisaaaa5840 ure welcome

[@ochrechap]

@@Aoekin u're also welcome

[@pauljacobus1066]

Once again, I'm a little late in viewing this video (I'm writing this in October of 2024 and I'm always late to the game) but I need to say that this was a well done video and I admire your willingness to narrate the entire video in one take (despite a couple of bloopers). The information was very good, very important, and very well-presented. Thanks!

[@oldsesalt8496]

The 27th Amendment's story is awesome.

[@chonkychonk]

For real

[@ryanmathis8286]

I think we should do it again for the title of nobility amendment

[@evankhell8942]

I’m not a US citizens but i love how straightforward and historical these amendments are! US has the best constitution in the world.

[@chonkychonk]

The 27th amendment was particularly interesting with how it was passed, makes you think! I’m an American and i’m a sucker for the history too, which makes learning about this shit so much more interesting and enriching

[@bunk95]

Slaves dont buy/sell. See the appropriate [professional] to find out how this applies to you.

[@AntoineWilliams7118]

Americans don’t care about history. Only about buying prescription drugs and McDonalds

[@kennethoakes1388]

Such a good idea to reeducate our public. Should be mandatory for government officials

[@Jeremy-Two]

Exactly.

[@roygbiv5164]

You know what I like? I like that people feel the need to write down what was just heard in the vid, and because they wrote it in the comments, it gives that particular statement more validity than others...

[@kurttrue2198]

You know what I like? I like that people feel the need to write down what was just heard in the vid, and because they wrote it in the comments, it gives that particular statement more validity than others...

[@HomebirthMommaX3]

The story behind the 27th amendment is very fascinating and inspiring.

[@Rebel-Forces-Earth-007]

The 28th Amendment should be Congressional Term Limits for the House and Senate. You guys can hammer out the specifics, but I do think it is high time for this to change.

[@podunkest]

I have mixed feelings about that. What if you were a rare district who actually really liked your representative? Trust me though, I get it.

[@stratcat4450]

We do already have term limits every two and four years. Having more informed and serious voters (regardless of party) would make mandatory term limits a moot issue.

[@chaosmorris5865]

​@@podunkestThen that's a sacrifice that needs to be made, better 100 decent candidates come and go then one tyrant hold power for eternity.

[@chaosmorris5865]

​@@stratcat4450Amy system that relies only on good intentions to function properly is destined for failure.

[@PatGunn]

Why?

[@stevenewman1393]

This wonderful program on the teaching and this great message on each of the 27 amendments was very awesome indeed Sir!👌.

[@JulieAnnRacino]

Quite concerned on the reported fate of the ERA-Equal Rights Amendment!

[@SockGoblin801]

I get your videos randomly in my feed and I really enjoy the refresher from time to time. Well laid out for a swift explanation.

[@davepatton7932]

Even though I’ve learned about most of these amendments in history class it’s good to have a refresher. Great job

[@jimhughes1070]

😂😢😂😢😢😂😂

[@chonkychonk]

Agreed, constantly thinking about the amendments is my new goal as I want to become a police officer

[@sirtree9080]

Bravo! It's so hard to pick a favorite, they're all awesome and have such great stories to tell about US!

[@JohnLincolnUSA]

Awesome - thank you so much for the enlightenment and education.

[@erickm4306]

What an amazing and educational video, so many interesting history behind the supreme law of the land. Thank you for such eloquent explanation.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

[@jhill6033]

The problem with this amendment, is it leaves to argument what is excessive, cruel and unusual.

[@jerseylovesteph]

Thank you very much. This is so helpful i really didn’t know all my rights as a US citizen. Thank you

[@genesisvruizvalentin919]

Well explained! Really interesting the stories behind some of them!

[@richardsimms251]

Great video. Is Canada as good or better than the USA regarding Freedom of Speech ?

[@bcc7777]

Thank you. I really enjoyed this.

[@isatousarr7044]

Amendments to the US Constitution are ratified through a process detailed in Article V, which includes two main stages: proposal and ratification. To propose an amendment, Congress must pass it by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Alternatively, a national constitutional convention can be called by two-thirds of state legislatures, though this method has never been used. This proposal stage ensures that amendments have significant support from either elected representatives or state governments before moving forward. For an amendment to be ratified, it must be approved by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states) or by conventions within the states, as directed by Congress. This high threshold is designed to make constitutional amendments difficult to pass, ensuring that only amendments with broad and sustained support are incorporated. This rigorous process preserves the Constitution's stability and guards against changes driven by transient political trends or fleeting public opinions. Amendments and periods of constitutional reform typically occur during times of significant social, political, or economic change. Historical examples include the 13th Amendment (abolishing slavery), the 14th (establishing equal protection under the law), and the 19th (granting women's suffrage), which were all ratified during pivotal moments in American history. These periods often involve movements pushing for civil rights and greater inclusivity, highlighting shifts in societal values and a desire to address perceived deficiencies in the Constitution. The amendment process thus serves as a careful balance between allowing for necessary change and maintaining the foundational principles of the document.

[@TheCCRBisUSELESS]

“My experience dealing with violations of my rights has made it clear to me that no one cares about constitutional law anymore. It seems that the focus has shifted entirely to personal injury cases, and issues of constitutional integrity are being overlooked.”

[@mosquito6334]

the US constiution and it's amendment system is really a genius design of mankind and way ahead of it's time. respect it and protect it Americans, cause many of us want this but we can't.

[@danwylie-sears1134]

The thirteenth amendment abolished _non-penal_ slavery. In a hypothetical scenario where a state decides tomorrow to say that anyone convicted of selling more than ten grams of marijuana becomes a slave, not just in the sense of having work done in prisons be paid less than minimum wage but literally becomes property of whoever wins the bidding at an auction, the thirteenth amendment wouldn't stop it.

[@michaelferentino8412]

Thank you for this channel. Subscribed! 🇺🇸

[@emmerfarro]

Former AG Jeffrey Rosen.Thank you for honoring the J-6 committee invitation and your subsequent testimony before said committee and for honoring and supporting the constitution during that last loco month of Trump's term. You rule, dude!

[@lonedissenter_]

Not the same guy

[@dmc009]

The first ammendment is the best... ... the 10th is the most underrated

[@jakeg3126]

I like the 10th too

[@JulieAnnRacino]

Today, Americans including the US Presidents are intricately involved with the US Bill of Rights which we studied in elementary and high school! For example, the Pledge of Allegiance to the US flag, the phrase One Nation under God, and the right to own property and be free from unreasonable search and seizure. We are Americans.

[@arin-o7b]

9th is the most underrated

[@dmc009]

@@arin-o7b I apologize. I deleted my comment, I guess I deleted yours, too. Please, I am curious. What am I missing about the 9th ammendment?

[@dmc009]

@@arin-o7b I figured, maybe some people in new jersey are super passionate about not being able to pump their own gasoline and I didn't want that smoke.

[@brendanwarner2118]

There are no "reasonable regulations" to the 2nd Amendment. "Shall not be infringed" is what is written

[@SPIDEYONTRAIL]

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”

[@altoids6748]

Well regulated=reasonable regulations

[@unendingseeker4274]

“Shall” when used in the legal context in the bare acts mean “must/should” and is binding in that sense

[@edwardedwards6804]

​@@altoids6748that's not what it means.

[@altoids6748]

@@edwardedwards6804 quite literally synonyms for the words "well" and "regulated"

[@carolinebenforado]

Excellent, engaging overview. I've been trying to read the Constitution on my own, but lack the context necessary for comprehension. Thank you for this.

[@seansoccer100]

Great video and I appreciate how you corrected yourself on secession versus succession

[@seansoccer100]

@michaeldane-yu6zo research deez nutz!

[@seansoccer100]

@michaeldane-yu6zo please read deez nutz!

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

[@franciscodanconia45]

SHALL NOT seems pretty clear to me

[@abunchofrandomgarbage23]

@@franciscodanconia45 Yeah, and let's just ignore that infringed is basically another word for blocked, so 2A IS actually advocating for the rights to own guns, contrary to your leftist beliefs.

[@franciscodanconia45]

@@abunchofrandomgarbage23 oops, look like you got me totally backwards. Sorry for your mistake. MOLON LABE

[@abunchofrandomgarbage23]

@@franciscodanconia45 Wait, were you supposed to be anti-gun control with that reply? Because if you were, I look like a complete idiot right now.

[@LoisMann-g4u]

I love this walk though the 27 amendments

[@kevinpoole4323]

Excellent Run

[@milaantionette2450]

Thank you for breaking it down! Super helpful.

[@TheRealKaay]

I’m so so happy i finally know all my amendments

[@danhurst9048]

This is very informative...thank you for posting this

[@aicram62]

I should like to know more about proposals that have not been ratified. My understanding is that there is a request for an article 5 convention that has been ratified by 16 or so states. Who can make these proposals?

[@tylert9875]

This is amzing content. Thanks 🙏

[@DawniiiDDD]

5th amendment also protects against seized property from bring used against you in a court of law because it's considered self incrimination

[@shroompicn-shrooman]

PLEASE TELL ME WHERE IT SAID WITH SOME REASONABLE REGULATIONS.. LIKE YOU SAID 👇 2nd amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ✌🇺🇸👍

[@ha103844]

I was going to comment the same thing. There's no such thing as "reasonable regulations," only infringements.

[@wheelchairlife8926]

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited... or example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." - Justice Antonin Scalia, DC v. Heller

[@shroompicn-shrooman]

@@ha103844 correct 🎯

[@reeb3687]

i think the main problem with this is the inability to own rocket-propelled explosive weapons. if the government or china were to attack us by air, it would be difficult to fend them off with just bullets. also, i would like to explode my neighbor carl's house with an rpg because he just sucks.

[@reeb3687]

@@ha103844 "erm actually, as a libertarian..." 🤓

[@sarahcrowe9730]

We need to be reminded what it is to be an AMERICAN. REGARDLESS of skin color!❤❤ Once we are AMERICANS WE MUST RISE TO WHAT OUR PRIVILEGED RIGHTS ARE‼️🙏🙏🕊❤️❤️🕊🙏🙏🇺🇸🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸♥️♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🕊🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🕊🕊🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🕊🕊🕊❤️❤️❤️

[@withallduerespectcompletely]

Can Bill of rights can update with more modern language? What do we the people think?

[@JulieAnnRacino]

Thank you for the brief review today. Believe it or not, did have that DC could not vote in 1988, and that voting for President and VP were violated in 2020! And the, of course, US territories versus US states.

[@Bad.Pappy.Official]

Awesome. 😎

[@normvw4053]

"The emphasis has been taken from the Bill of Rights and placed on the interpretation of the Constitution that best suits the people in power."

[@DarioLencinaPersonal]

amazing video!!

[@MaxHernandez-t4k]

i watch this video to study for my middle school test

[@wandabeasley3419]

That great 👍

[@penonpaper3132]

Hope you got a good score🫡

[@alexandercrash2191]

Share with all your friends! 😎

[@owenhood6460]

Great video

[@anonymoushuman8443]

I wonder what the next new Amendment will be

[@ALBANIAN4FREDOM]

You mean what America it going to look like under the New World Order?

[@daviddunn1377]

So far the most interesting thing is the 9th Amendment. I couldn't remember what it was. It's not often discussed which given its intent makes sense.

[@mojaveliz]

'In light of the student's historic efforts to prove the professor and T.A wrong in their assessment of his homework paper, Mr. Watson deserves A+.' -Update of Student Academic Record. March 3rd, 2017, 35 years later Crazy it took so long, but awesome he finally got what he deserved in the first place

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

[@hughbryant898]

The US constitution was a blueprint of the Philippine constitution. During the commonwealth years, the US use the constitution to project the tenets of democracy in Asia in the past. The Philippines made different versions until the latest 1986 version. I believe the US constitution will prevail on the remaining commonwealth nation and US territories until they are granted/or the people of those territories decides for independence.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

[@johnjones3101]

Wow great, thanks !

[@musicfuhrer]

Thank you for this very interesting video. Unfortunately, I live in the U.K which is a monarchy, and we only have our famous 'unwritten constitution' i.e we don't have one. It seems like you guys are trailblazing democracy.

[@PieInTheSky9]

Unless you were black

[@jenniferhardt9208]

Great video for intro. to US Constitution lesson.

[@lmnopopsicle]

About the unsynchronized blinking...

[@chadsharpe7213]

What happened to the 2A. 🤔

[@jacobfuchs962]

It has always had restrictions and continue to have restrictions today

[@robertforrester578]

Good work.

[@larrymiller4]

The Constitution, and Constitutional governance, are by their nature "conservative," as is life itself. That is, it is in accord with the Laws of Cause-and-Effect. At America's founding, it was established that we are a self-governing people, and that if we are to have a government (and human beings of necessity must have a government), that it must be by the CONSENT of the People, and that a commonly agreed-to and impartial structure of laws be the standard by which all citizens may live in harmony. Essentially, these are based on the principle of the "Golden Rule," that all citizens agree that we live by the same standard, and that we are free to live as our conscience dictates provided we do not infringe on our Creator-endowed rights among one other. If we presume to live under a "living" document, where it could mean anything anyone wanted it to mean at any time, as a "liberal" or "progressive" person would advocate, *it would then mean NOTHING.* The Constitution means what it says, when it was written and ratified by the States who brought it into being.

[@matthiasbalke9089]

If that we're as you say, there would be no amendments.

[@larrymiller4]

@@matthiasbalke9089 The Constitution provides for Amendments, but it made the process for ratifying them a difficult one, and that also was by design.

[@wallheadkdir]

Why when you get to the 2nd amendment you talk about it for 38sec and move right along?

[@MrRizzyWizzy]

Did that hurt your feelings?

[@alpheusjoseph9907]

good educational law class about the constitution I have a bachelor's and master's degree in Criminal Justice

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

[@franciscodanconia45]

Exactly. Which makes about 70% of the federal government’s activities unconstitutional.

[@BobbyPERu4u]

@@franciscodanconia45 Read the rest of the constitution. There’s more to it than the amendments.

[@DarkClosetOfTheMind]

Great history lesson thank you

[@hawkdad4267]

what you mean subject to reasonable regulations regarding the 2nd? Where does it say that?

[@christianhillpt]

He referenced the Supreme Court ruling on the matter in 2008

[@christianhillpt]

Heller & McDonald which further expresses our individual rights to bear arms with the aforementioned reasonable regulations

[@susanbuchser418]

What are the other uses for guns?

[@yardsaleuw3075]

Amendment 28 Any public official accepting bribes from lobbyist or buying stock shall be fined $100 million and life in prison.

[@philobetto5106]

and the G6 private jet and the costume flying broom, built by LockheedMartin EeehhH ehh ehhh heeee!!

[@Tessou]

That violates the 8th.

[@THEDECEPTIONCHRONICLES]

100%

[@joelphanord9855]

Thank you Patrick Mahomes for teaching me about my amendments

[@robertfindley921]

When I was a little boy they were trying to pass the ERA amendment. My male classmates told me if it passed, boys and girls would have to use the same bathroom. I was terrified. It was perhaps my first experience with propaganda.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Section 1 Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2 Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[@LilCasinoMusic]

Is there any way to get rid of the income tax amendment

[@BobbyPERu4u]

The same way it Prohibition amendment got removed, which is to write another amendment that removes it. Google the procedure for that.

[@catalinamarquez6937]

Who made the Reconstruction without the personas juridical 😮wow

[@joshuaduff8588]

The 2nd amendment literally prevents regulation… “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. Infringed means regulated therefore it shall not be regulated. The militia at the time was “all men between the ages of 18 and 45”. So the argument that the right had anything to do with the military is invalid because both “the people” and “well regulated militia” meant every man. It explicitly states that the government doesn’t have the authority to regulate the right, which they have for both the people and the military. It’s also important to note that it was not only a right to bear arms, but it was required by law to own the necessary weapons and equipment to fight.

[@themuskrat5776]

Second amendment is not a military amendment. It’s a right of the citizens, not the military.

[@franciscodanconia45]

One thousand thumbs up MOLON LABE

[@andrewstockwell66]

It allows the establishment of a militia, so yeah it is a military amendment.

[@themuskrat5776]

@@andrewstockwell66 Want line in the second amendment allow for the establishment of the militia? Please do break it down why an amendment is needed for that?

[@andrewstockwell66]

​@@themuskrat5776A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State

[@themuskrat5776]

@@andrewstockwell66 keep going.

[@phuriousstorm]

Thank you

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Section 1 The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude- Section 2 The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Section 1 The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age. Section 2 The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[@bunk95]

Stories of practice for the send of slavery, thought of as a tangent (in case you thought you heard/saw them claim argument or do so shortly after). Control your [customers].

[@jivory6888]

I'd like to propose a 28th Amendment recognizing the Queen of Hawaii and her financial support to the United States, restoring her crown, and title acknowledging her sovereignty and her financial contributions to the US Economy. It seems without her the US Economy would have collapsed along time ago.

[@podunkest]

The tenth amendment has always fascinated me and it makes me wonder why we'd be so ok with the federal government still passing so many laws. Especially considering the supremacy clause exists. It would make more sense if the country was the size it was in the 18th century but it's not. I feel like the stregth of our country lies in State's rights and often passing broad, sweeping federal laws cannot possibly be good for everyone everywhere. Especially in our modern behemoth of a bureaucracy. I feel like we could much more efficiently and effectively govern ourselves on nuanced issues at a much smaller level. Sure, there's plenty of purpose in having a strong federal government but they've done more than enough damage in the last 100 years.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Section 1 After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited. Section 2 The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. Section 3 This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.

[@ibe310]

SO WHAT DOES 1776 MEAN IN ALL THIS AS COMPARED TO 1791?

[@jamesgreer323]

1776 was when we declared independence. However back then we didn't have the constitution that we have now. The constitution was ratified in 1787 and Bill of rights ratified in 1791

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

Section 1 The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax. Section 2 The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[@michaelmalmgren431]

Small note... You cannot plead the 5th. You can plead Guilty, Not Guilty, No Contest, ect but you can't plead the 5th. However, you can invoke your rights under the 5th amendment. My note really wouldn't change your right to remain silent, but it's a more proper way to express your desire than incorrect wordage

[@phyzix_phyzix]

The 13th amendment does not abolish slavery. Here's the actual text of the amendment. Read it carefully, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

[@jaybird4354]

You would think some more amendments would be made since we have a pretty go A.I. now. Does A.I. get a pass? I think a A.I. lawyer would be awesome.... Trying to have A.I. Semi-Trucks driving right next to families. (Human lifes!) You would think we would create some amendments before allowing A.I. to physically function in are world. Would you not? -P.Nokes Good luck!

[@catalinamarquez6937]

Petitions Where 😮

[@rjust2297]

So in the very first statement of the video you mentioned that. State legislature can you call a convention for proposing amendments. My question to you is this where the filibuster would come into play? 56 years old and still learning politics can you believe it😂

[@oldsesalt8496]

The 18th Amendment huh? I'm drinking a Martini as I watch this.

[@SuperAngel32]

21st repealed it goofy

[@billmitchell2080]

Plea bargains are and should be recognized as unconstitutional.

[@KnowlesBradford]

Wait a minute the part about resonantly of the right to bear arms is false .

[@frankwrogg2515]

Blew right through the second, like a good politician.

[@jamess7745]

Would you have rather he spent an hour detailing everyone's personal theories as to how it should be interpreted or changed? He stuck to the facts, just like he did for every amendment.

[@ryanmathis8286]

I think the states should ratified the title of nobility amendment today and make it the 28th amendment. This could be use to stop the Federal Reserve

[@bunk95]

Other stories available. Force the [citizens] to tell the truth of whats occurring over and over? Statement and restatement of [consent] to be kept as a [citizen] can be made to be thought of as done in thought-tech updates did occur.

[@ryanmathis8286]

@@bunk95 what are you even talking about?

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

[@JoeyWashington-ky7up]

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

[@nfpnone8248]

Only the first 12 amendments are valid, and the 12th is on thin ice because of how it changed the process, even though they tried to keep everything the same, by splitting the number of persons to be considered when no person received a majority of the electors at 5, with 3 for President and 2 for Vice President. But that actually had the reverse affect than what was intended, it made it impossible for any person to ever receive a majority of the electors because it cut the number of votes in half, which also ruled out ties, because if they tie, then there are no persons with a majority, meaning that the persons that tied are not only the persons to be considered, the top 3 persons receiving votes must be considered, and the States are well within their rights to vote for that third person, ignoring the two that tied. But this raises an important question, if the certified lists from each State don’t have All Persons receiving votes, the Number of Votes for each, and for which office, then how are you determining of any person received a majority of the Electors, which is a majority of All the People, and if no person receives a majority of All the Electors then how will they determine the top 3 persons to consider. The parties cannot determine the persons we consider, and the parties cannot determine the person to become President in their own competitive partisan elections, as the constitutionally established process requires that the electors, which are an exact representation of ALL THE PEOPLE, determine the candidates that must be considered by the States in congress to determine their choice by vote, 1 vote per State, and a majority of ALL THE STATES is necessary to the choice. There is no process for the parties to determine the candidates to be considered, how the choice will be determined and determine the choice. The Parties aren’t empowered to determine the choice, ultimately it’s the States which are empowered to determine the choice, and that includes the process to determine the number of candidates that they want to consider to determine the choice. The same is true for presidential nominations for vacancies in the executive and judicial departments, the States assembled in the Senate determine the number of nominees, the qualifications each nominee must have, and the legislative proceeding which they use to determine the choice, that’s what by their advice means, it means that they have the power to determine all the parameters of making the choice. But back on amendments, the “Bill of Rights” are not actually amendments, they are addendums, as they do not amend any of the Articles of the Constitution of the United States, as the Articles of Confederation are State’s rights as members of the Union and cannot be amended at all without unanimous agreement of All the States as an amendment would fundamentally change their Rights as members of the Union. The balance of the amendments to the Constitution of the United States are invalid because they were not made as required by Article 5 of the Constitution of the United States as all our legislative assemblies are improperly assembled, State and Federal, making it impossible to achieve the quorum and majority consensus requirements to consider and agree to the amendments, and impossible for the State legislatures to ratify the amendment for it to be adopted!

[@tsarrite]

14th Amendment. So a pregnant non-US citizen on vacation in the US, suddenly has a child on US soil, that child automatically becomes a US citizen?

[@MrRizzyWizzy]

yes