Pov: you have an exam on law and contract so you came to watch KZbin
@cmama65102 жыл бұрын
Yess!!! Thousand times Yesss😂
@aron31972 жыл бұрын
That's literally why I am here 😃
@chishakabosha282 жыл бұрын
Yes! This Thursday I'm writing my end of year final in Contract Law 😂
@taniakhalil36448 жыл бұрын
And if we want to make it a legal binding contact we will add intention and consideration.
@yondon79392 жыл бұрын
Great i understand very well I would recommend any law student to watch..
@Reenaarshi2 жыл бұрын
very clear explanation and voice nice one but I found this little lately
@tasaarmy7 Жыл бұрын
When your law teacher ditches you before the exam and a KZbin video comes to the rescue
@figuringitoutttt4 жыл бұрын
UR AMAZING LOVE THIS VIDEO HELPED A LOT
@mdrashedkhan36044 жыл бұрын
thanks helped me alot
@simioriakhi57074 жыл бұрын
Is change of mind the same as revocation?
@TheLawSimplified4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@feiz018 жыл бұрын
In a situation of a debt purchaser buying a portfolio of debt, if terms and conditions were broken in the assignment agreement, would a debtor be able to terminate their debt?
@JustAnotherThisDJ6 жыл бұрын
feiz01 no not any more generally speaking but it would depend on multiple issues.
@pbeccas10 жыл бұрын
Using email, party 1 seeks party 2 for a service and offers cash. Using email party 2 agrees to do the service for the cash. Using email party 1 states to party 2 a formal contract will be posted out to sign. Party 1 never does post the contract. Party 2 does not do the work because the contract never arrived. Can party 1 argue that a contract was in place based on the email discussion. Can party 2 argue that they are not liable to carry out any work due to the belief a formal contract was meant to be in place? Basically in this example does a written email become a binding agreement even though a formal contract was promised after the initial agreement?
@TheLawSimplified10 жыл бұрын
Hi pbeccas, Apologies for the late reply. Didn't notice this comment earlier. Contract Law is about obligations between parties along with their intention to do so. In this particular instance, it would depend on the parties intention as well as how definitive the email corrospondence itself was. Morover, if you recall certain precepts of Contract Law, which include the principle of 'Consensus ad idem', which roughly translates to a similar understanding of the circumstances and terms of the Contract between the parties, then it is safe to say that the purported consensus has not been reached (i.e. One party being under the impression that a Contract has been entered into, while another isn't). On the other hand, does the email correspondence outline all of the required elements of the Contract itself? This would of course depend on the facts themselves. Hope this helps. Please feel free to ask any follow-up pbeccas :)
@pbeccas10 жыл бұрын
Thanks, that was very helpful. I believe the digital age adds extra complications when trying to understand contract law
@rykarrahmitchell3 жыл бұрын
Hello, if a person makes an offer and other person or person who are not the offeree accept the offer what comes out of that and is there a case to support that?
@TheLawSimplified3 жыл бұрын
Hi Rykarrah. Gibson v MCC suggests that in order for a statement to amount to an offer, it must be: (1) on certain terms, (2) unambiguous and (3) directed at a particular person. Thus, if the person who accepts the offer is not the person it was offered to, it cannot become an agreement since (3) above is unfulfilled.
@rykarrahmitchell3 жыл бұрын
@@TheLawSimplified Thank you so much 🥺❤️. God bless love from The Bahamas 🇧🇸🇧🇸!!
@jasonsobey16298 жыл бұрын
The two are very similar but can I enquire as to whether this applies to UK contract law or US?
@TheLawSimplified8 жыл бұрын
+Jason Sobey Hi. This lesson and course is in relation to UK Contract Law
@sarahwill97596 жыл бұрын
Particularly English and Welsh Contract Law... Scotland is slightly different also
@taniakhalil36448 жыл бұрын
you haven't explained the basic definition of agreement and that is very simple, "Agreement arises when there are offer and acceptance" All agreements are not contract.
@TheLawSimplified8 жыл бұрын
+Tania Khalil Hi. Please check the other videos on the Contract Law playlist :)
@taniakhalil36448 жыл бұрын
Hey I have checked but the matter of the fact is you don't explained the main cases and that's pretty sad. Sorry
@TheLawSimplified8 жыл бұрын
Tania Khalil Hi. The Case Summaries and Spider Graphs are part of the complete course, which can be downloaded from: bit.ly/Contract-Law
@taniakhalil36448 жыл бұрын
Okay thanks will have a look
@oliveryates73967 жыл бұрын
Hi, course is advertised as $10 here but is $50 on Udemy! Is this a mistake?Thanks
@TheLawSimplified7 жыл бұрын
+Oliver Yates Hi Oliver. If you purchase through the coupon code found on the video description, it will be $10 😊
@msrabiahealthcarecenterand20588 жыл бұрын
I seen this.
@Katakurienergy8 жыл бұрын
How bout verbal acceptance? contracts for sale of property/land
@TheLawSimplified8 жыл бұрын
+romeo Hi. An interesting case is Spiro v Lintern, where silence amounted to acceptance :)
@Mini_Negi6 жыл бұрын
Agreement
@patelvidhu48407 жыл бұрын
Too long Video for agreement. It should be point to point and with least length.