Absolutely love your channel Andy. The concise focus on the solution without a lot of tangents (pun intended), and the How Exciting tag-line gets me every time. Keep up the good work!
@theabshow731811 ай бұрын
At 3:36, for the denominator you could just use a²-b²=(a+b)(a-b) so that would instantly give you 4²-36×3
@zOni41311 ай бұрын
Во-первых, он явно знает про эту формулу. Не зря же он решил домножить именно на это число всю дробь. Просто у него в разборах задач он всегда всё делает на максимально доступном уровне, по этому он раскрывал скобки по честному. Во-вторых, у вас опечатка в формуле. P.S. Прошу прощения. Опечатка в формуле появляется только при переводе комментария на русский.
@Pluton170911 ай бұрын
i had that in school today thats funny
@theabshow731811 ай бұрын
@@zOni413Understood I thought if he told people about that then people would become more efficient in doing problems like that rather than breaking it up which will take up some more time. Generally in entrance tests, people can't afford to lose time in places like that
@invictus853911 ай бұрын
He was excited for real this time
@seireiart10 ай бұрын
yuuka pfp, how exciting
@Randumbvideosss11 ай бұрын
Hey, Andy I like how you use the 90-60-30 triangle rule but it would be more interesting if you used the sin or cos theta so that one also gets to know how this 30-60-90 came into in the first place.
@normalbattlecat808811 ай бұрын
Just bisect an equilateral triangle with side length 2, and you get two 30-60-90 triangles. Take one of said triangles, and notice that the hypotenuse is 2 and the short side is 1. Use pythagorean theorem to get your 1-sqrt3-2 identity
@TheSumitGupta11 ай бұрын
tan theta
@z000ey11 ай бұрын
@@normalbattlecat8088 exactly. The a*sqrt(3) doesn't derive from trigonometry but from the Pythagorean theorem.
@Randumbvideosss11 ай бұрын
@@z000ey huh how? Would you please elaborate?
@z000ey11 ай бұрын
@Randumbvideosss well if you look at a 30 60 90 triangle and mirror it over the longer cathetus (adjacent) you get a 60 60 60 thus equilateral triangle, thus you know that the shorter cathetus of the original triangle is 1/2 of the hypothenuse and that the longer cathetus of the original triangle is actually the height of the equilateral mirrored one. Using Pythagoras you get hypothenuse c squared equals c/2 squared plus height squared, from which height is (c x sqrt3) /2
@Insightfill9 ай бұрын
3:09 "Now I want to get x by itself" and ask it to think long and hard about how its life is going, and if it really thinks it's going anywhere in the long-run. Gotta have a plan, x.
@Qermaq6 ай бұрын
I never want to get my x by itself. I want another responsible adult around just in case things go south.
@gumbspleengle527011 ай бұрын
What software do you use for your videos?
@Kreypossukr11 ай бұрын
I’m also curious about this
@JuanFrancos-kj6vd10 ай бұрын
Whatever he uses I’m sure it requires a lot of design and planning. What he does is great.
@coolmangame414110 ай бұрын
its possible to use powerpoint to replicate his animations
@iannoezaratechavez45617 ай бұрын
I got to a different equation for the answer: Instead of rationalising the fractions I left them as X/√3 and 3X/√3. Then the base of the triangle is 1=4X/√3 + 6X Then you can isolate the X to get the final answer: X=1/(4/√3 + 6) Which is a different equation, but still gets you that same 0.1203...
@zanyboy8k11 ай бұрын
cant belive i saw this the minute it was uploaded lol. keep making content love the math problems! cheers!!
@Alians010811 ай бұрын
He's going to quit because of this comment
@atul576811 ай бұрын
ok your not funny
@tplayz345410 ай бұрын
Love ur contet plz bring amc or any other Olympiad previous year questions
@mekaindo6 ай бұрын
He was really excited for discovering something. 😅
@Vengemann11 ай бұрын
These questions are very fun to solve ngl
@sweetmercury11 ай бұрын
What software are you using on screen when you make the vids?
@victorldunn963811 ай бұрын
... I too would like to know what software is being used please.
@DandoPorsaco-ho1zs11 ай бұрын
PowerPoint can do this easily.
@sweetmercury11 ай бұрын
@@DandoPorsaco-ho1zs i see. It looked like something he was working with “live” rather than a preset presentation.
@Playerone128710 ай бұрын
112k subs I knew you will grow rapidly Even you knew that because your videos are very simple and quick Last time I saw you had 37k subs some 15 days ago
@DandoPorsaco-ho1zs11 ай бұрын
I started with the same triangle on the left (sqrt(3)), but I managed to make it slightly more complicated afterwards. In the end, I got the exact same answer, with the same rationalisation, though.
@carmicha11 ай бұрын
I’d like to know more about how you’re approaching this channel, your content production tools and process, and how it fits into the whole AndyMath empire. But I get that it’s none of my business.
@karlkarlson350211 ай бұрын
*DO YOU MOONLIGHT FOR THE CIA? BECAUSE YOU'RE VERY NOSY!*
@p3rryw11 ай бұрын
Could possibly save a step by noticing the two triangles and similar, so the sides are in a ratio of 1:3… then rather than all the adding up you would know that the total unknown length is 4/route3
@namanhnguyen793311 ай бұрын
plus 6x too because it also contains the length of 3 squares, 6x + 4x/root3 = 1
@the_verTigO8 ай бұрын
For the left triangles i divide x by tan(60) (which is sqrt3) so that's x/sqrt3. For the right triangle I divide 3x by sqrt3 so that's 3x/sqrt3. Everything inbetween is x+2x+3x=6x. x/sqrt3+3x/sqrt3=4x/sqrt3 (4/sqrt3)x+6x=1 x(4/sqrt3+6)=1 x=1/(4/sqrt3+6)
@tomdekler928010 ай бұрын
I wonder if this picture would work with any other quadratically growing number of boxes, or would the edges of some boxes be sticking out of the triangle?
@squishygrapeschannel327611 ай бұрын
He looks like he actually had fun doing math.
@thedivstuplay347611 ай бұрын
Ngl these remind me of i solved olympiads, pretty fun
@Napsteri7 ай бұрын
What is the program used on videos?
@altogeorge24066 ай бұрын
Did you find out?
@Napsteri6 ай бұрын
@@altogeorge2406 sadly, no.
@KingdomOfDaylightsDauphin11 ай бұрын
I love these!
@mayislive4611 ай бұрын
How exciting 🔥🔥🔥
@rishabhmittal955211 ай бұрын
3:35 you can just use the difference of two squares
@zOni41311 ай бұрын
Слишком лёгкая задача. Вспоминаем определение тангенса угла, вспоминаем чему равен тангенс 60° - всё, считай готово. Осталась только чистая арифметика. (Ну а про сумму углов треугольника и про равенство сторон квадрата мне даже и говорить неловко...)
@Datnguyenburh2 ай бұрын
if we cant use our calculator, it's much harder, but i think we can still use it, and for me, we can use a bit of our knowledge and our calculator is enough, just simplify our calculation and it seems a little easier: 6x(tan60)+4x= tan60 => x(6tan60 + 4) = tan60 => x= (6tan60 + 4) / tan60 and still the same result
@HereForTheComments11 ай бұрын
Does Andy still check his Patreon? I am hopelessly fascinated with how he does this stuff and I have to know what goes on in his head.
@paulshelley766411 ай бұрын
You're very good. Good explanation. Thanks
@nk_w8411 ай бұрын
Hello there! Thank you for such an amazing video. Even with my poor english language knowledges i understood everything. Nice problem, nice solution. Thx for your work
@Kuwustilam11 ай бұрын
How exciting!
@tplayz345410 ай бұрын
As i did just used tan 60 i e rt 3 to find that small length and got ans very easy
@rayyanmohd238210 ай бұрын
cool way simplifying of trigonometry.
@TheTallRaver11 ай бұрын
Cool!👍👍
@Mike81711 ай бұрын
When you discovered how to zoom in, you missed the perfect opportunity to say, "How exciting!"™😀
@galatynix10 ай бұрын
if it wasn't for the 0 and 1, the solution would be a perfect 0.1234567
@sheelakumbhar64119 ай бұрын
How exiting!
@OPMfan_0097611 ай бұрын
Good question. Thank you buddy your content is amazing
@nabil438911 ай бұрын
where have you been?
@GregoryFord9810 ай бұрын
How exciting
@StudyClass10th011 ай бұрын
Nice 😮
@irvindalacourt71784 ай бұрын
brilliant
@mikep381310 ай бұрын
You could have done 20 things wrong in that video, and i would have had no idea.
@tsirahxuan_R11 ай бұрын
#TIL Square root of number can also be called as radical number..
@Cr1ehcj5g85n11 ай бұрын
Good content
@cyanophage43517 ай бұрын
How radical
@hazxries62287 ай бұрын
I feel like there are much easier and faster ways for this
@zunkman111 ай бұрын
I would have gone for the obvious that "??" would be 3 times "?" since they are similar triangles. "?" has the height as 1 and "??" has the height as 3. So ?? would be 3?.
@Idran9 ай бұрын
That's basically already what you do whenever you use one of the standard triangles, honestly.
@bryanscott867511 ай бұрын
❤
@Noor-sl5ep11 ай бұрын
Yeah, i don't know what is going on.
@LM-he7eb10 ай бұрын
If that is true, then x = 0.1146
@adamconnor18986 ай бұрын
Downrated because I dislike problems where you have to remember factoids to solve them. It would be better to derive what the relationships between the legs of the triangle are.
@Ben_M_D11 ай бұрын
You only got half the answer, as I always say to my students. You literally forgot units.😁
@lucastoutcourt799111 ай бұрын
But there is no unit here
@Grizzly01-vr4pn8 ай бұрын
@@lucastoutcourt7991 So the answer is x = (9 - 2√3)/46 _units_ ≈ 0.1203 _units_
@andreaahplay61526 ай бұрын
Actually, x is 1/10.
@Manigo174311 ай бұрын
Annoying editing. Channel blocked.
@Grizzly01-vr4pn8 ай бұрын
Maths is too hard. Channel blocked. There, I fixed that for you.