This is extremily powerfull but, as he mention, DON'T USE IT anywhere or even worst, DON'T USE IT if u don't know what ure doing ... 6+ years of React here and toke me around 4 days to play with this methodology and understand the real need for it. It's beautiful but, requeries UX/UI experience and React maturity. Best channel by far and keep this insane work bro, ever for seniors like me, u still save us a lot a doubts here and there, 😂 🤘 cheers!!!
@isaacjon5 ай бұрын
Is it possible to let us know what is your salary as a react developer with 6+ experience? Do you struggle to find a job or not in these days?
@marceloviannadev5 ай бұрын
@@isaacjon Shure, everything is relative and depends and salary's for a more senior role can start around 4K USD/month and flyes higher, again, very depends... Keep one thing in mind, seniority's is much more about maturity and exp than code itself alright? I have 15+ in development/design specialized in frontend so, u will never know every syntax or 100% of something but, if u have the business mind and understatement on how a software works and it's layers and business flow, you will be ahead of millions. Struggle? Linkedin recruiters reach me at least 2 times per week offering something so, if u have maturity + exp + prove in a interview what u are capable of, u more than fine to proceed and keep trying but, keep in mind that, is annoying get hired cause u will fight for the role with a lot of people. It doesn't mean that u no good enough, it's just the reality of life, everything happens in gods time, not ours, cheers bro I hope it helps! 🤘
@marceloviannadev5 ай бұрын
@@isaacjon "Hey, I wrote you a reply, but I think the KZbin algorithm didn't like it. So here's another one. I'm not talking about money because this is highly relative to the role and your level. One thing I can say for sure is that development is much more about maturity and experience rather than just technical knowledge. You must understand very well how the layers of a software work in order to develop a sense and experience inside you where you just know stuff, and even when you don't, you have an idea of what you have to do in different scenarios." I hope it helps, cheers! 🤘
@hakanberat5 ай бұрын
Hey @marceloviannadev , can you give examples of usecases where we should not use this pattern?
@marceloviannadev5 ай бұрын
@@hakanberat Sure bro, it's very simple and u will never forget... Use Case for CC: Employ compound components when you need a versatile UI element that is used repeatedly across your app but requires adaptability based on the context or data it receives. For example, a notification component that needs to conform to a UI design pattern while also varying in presentation-such as with or without buttons, icons, or read status-based on different scenarios. When Not to Use: Avoid using compound components for static UI elements that do not vary and are used consistently throughout the app, such as a navigation top bar. These elements do not benefit from the adaptability that compound components provide. Note on Figma and Frontend: It's important to distinguish between component usage in Figma and frontend development. In Figma, designing various scenarios for a component is common, but not every design needs to be implemented as a compound component in the frontend. The decision should be based on the specific needs and rules of your project. I hope this streamlined explanation is helpful! 🤘
@kouameyaojean1482Ай бұрын
I've been hearing about the compound component for over a year. You've clarified it now. All the examples talked about select. Thanks
@rjwhite44245 ай бұрын
I've seen tutorials on this topic before, but this one does a way better job explaining on why to use the context. Thank you!
@alisancavus34835 ай бұрын
Literally what I was looking for. I had a component that needed to pass bunch of booleans and stuff for each case. Now, I know what to do!
@ariyoujahan96625 ай бұрын
18:07 این نیز بگذرد. 😊 You are absolutely one of the best react KZbiner I've ever known. Instead of just focusing on tooling and trends, you have shown us real way to become a senior react developer. And for some reasons I feel very proud 😉
@ViacheslavUstinov-g4x2 ай бұрын
Thank you, bun in my opinion, in such cases it may be comfortable to use a wrapper and pass dependent components inside with the corresponding props.
@odogwu-19185 ай бұрын
One Year or watching your Design pattern video could transform one into a senior react developer, if you can do two desing pattern videos in a week I would be in love lol
@BLOBBERNATOR3 ай бұрын
The time you take to explain the design process really pays off in your videos, especially here. We appreciate it! Such a cool and useful way of using context
@vinisoaz4 ай бұрын
Very nice video! I've been working with React for a long time, and when I see that pattern, it opens up a lot of possibilities in my React projects. Thanks from Brazil!
@ВитяДьяков-ж8ж5 ай бұрын
As always, you're on a super high level comparing to other teachers/mentors. Thanks for your videos, keep doing that!
@stefangarofalo31315 ай бұрын
I literally came across a perfect use case for this at my job some days ago, but ended up using render props instead I knew about this design pattern from shadcn components but I didn’t really know what to look for to learn more and implement it. Thank you so much for this!
@estebanbocardomedel5 ай бұрын
And it gets even more interesting when the subcomponents modify the main component state to change other subcomponent's behavior!
@SebiiAT5 ай бұрын
Awesome work! Keep in mind that compound components syntactically cannot be used in an RSC, eg: // will not work -> error Therefore PostTitle must be exported individually in order to be imported like this: // will work -> no error
@trejohnson76772 ай бұрын
f00king rsc’s.
@mootazbellehweslati56032 ай бұрын
Great , simple and straightforward explaination as usual
@michaellara6955 ай бұрын
These design pattern videos are amazing!!! This is by far one of the best channels to learn how to code, everything is very concise and clear 🔥🔥🔥
@rohitkochikkatfrancis5 ай бұрын
Your videos is HIGH QUALITY and just absolutely SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND !!!! Just amazing bro. Kindly keep with this style of teaching and don't change !! And thank you. For teaching me complex topics in such an easy to understand way and using examples. May the CODE be with you 🙌
@cosdensolutions5 ай бұрын
thank you for the kind words!
@joao-pedro-alves5 ай бұрын
You know, I'm not a React developer, actually I work with Vue but I always watch your videos because it gives me some valuable insights that I apply for Vue hahaha Another great video!
@mrpaulishaili4 ай бұрын
This is so lovely, and coming handy! Thank you Cosden!
@rajukadel100711 күн бұрын
Awesome content (very rare) , keep up the good work 💙
@jonathangardn2 ай бұрын
One om my favourite patterns to build UIs 🔥
@thieno224 ай бұрын
Thank you, very useful, expect you will refer more react patterns
@rohitdalal9545 ай бұрын
thank you so much for this. your content is really really good. Learning a lot. Thank you 🙌
@sapperusАй бұрын
You're really talented in complicated things explanation bro, keep it up! This is my favorite channel about React 👍
@Deus-lo-Vuilt3 ай бұрын
Very good video, keep up the good work, we appreciate the good material of patterns and others in react.
@chinmayghule82725 ай бұрын
This is by far the best explanation of compound components I've seen so far. I wanted to learn it since a while ago but all resources that I read or watched were too complicated for me to understand. Great work! BTW, can you please create a few videos to show how testing is done in React? I'm referring to complex use cases where you'd need to test custom hooks, contexts, or hooks which fetch data so you have to mock API for them.
@OtoixАй бұрын
Really good tutorials, cheers dude!
@daniguitar20125 ай бұрын
Love this kind of videos and the way you explain the step by step process, keep it up!
@ivan44865 ай бұрын
OMG this is so cool! I urgently need to apply it somewhere!
@bramdenelzen40705 ай бұрын
i always wondered how ui libraries did this, thanks!
@Dusty-o4t5 ай бұрын
I’m fan of the compound components because they give you more flexibility in different scenarios. I’m not completely sold on passing post as a prop and sharing with the others via context. In my opinion instead of passing post as a prop and getting the child components to render the title and instead just get them to render children. This way the consumer will have more control and no need to use context.
@jasonvictor17985 ай бұрын
I had a similar thought too. For simpler compound components I could see the provider working well but more complex ones with subcomponents handling many props the render children would be better
@deanolium2 ай бұрын
@@jasonvictor1798 The problem is that in a lot of projects, simple components eventually become complex ones with scope creep. So doing this exact style for them is just inviting code issues in the future.
@lucaspaixao81075 ай бұрын
I use the same pattern, but instead of passing all props to PostCard, i use the "subcomponents" rendering childrens too, like Hello, World, because you can do more things with your component, like if you need to change the color of the title or adding an icon after the text, things like this. Anyway, excellent video! :)
@sivaganesh44895 ай бұрын
Yes
@deanolium2 ай бұрын
Yep, this is the way you should use this pattern as it gives you a tonne more flexibility. It also removes the need for context just to share data around and makes handling events a bit easier. That isn't to say context isn't useful, but you can then use it for sending non-data props on the top component to the children which is a bit tidier. For instance, you could have a `size` prop on which changes the styling, and then make it so things like and use this to look appropriate. Ie, to handle the appearance and any logic inherent to that component. Essentially it changes these components to be purely about *how* to display the post elements, not what parts of the post to display.
@killswitch.5 ай бұрын
Compound Components are just too OP
@carloseduardomagalhaespere51125 ай бұрын
Excelent video as usual! This pattern is similar to the Composition Pattern, which is also quite interesting. Thanks =)
@keifer78135 ай бұрын
I would love to see you make a video completing a project from start to finish to see your process and learn from you
@cosdensolutions5 ай бұрын
that's exactly what is project react :D
@keifer78135 ай бұрын
@@cosdensolutions Oh. I'm broke as hell unfortunately
@mdkawsarislamyeasin40404 ай бұрын
Dammmm, you are my react Hero ❤
@RikiBryan1Ай бұрын
Top tier contents! 👍
@miloman1995s5 ай бұрын
video starts at 01:07
@sjoerdvermeijden2 ай бұрын
This is amazing! Altough i'm kind of confused as to why you would you use context for this instead of just passing the post as a prop.
@moot67945 ай бұрын
Love it. Great explanation. Thanks.
@ayanakojikiyot4 ай бұрын
It was very helpful. Thanks.
@hassanad944 ай бұрын
Great Tuto!!! Thank you!!
@cloynelson29745 ай бұрын
ahaha, I finally know how this is called :D Thanks, great vids, do more of them pls!
@alii22843 ай бұрын
great vid man. got a new subscriber
@Assassin295 ай бұрын
This looks good ❤
@fikilekentane69824 ай бұрын
…awesome Cos 👌🏾
@abhisekpaul5 ай бұрын
That's amazing 🔥
@Muhammed81-u7u5 ай бұрын
I love this tutorial🔥.
@toastyy14555 ай бұрын
Great idea! Thanks for the tutorial on this. I'm definitely guilty of adding a quick boolean prop to change some things around every now and then lol. 1 unrelated question though, any reason you're using types instead of interfaces? Are there any drawbacks? I've usually used types just for quick string types like: type Status = 'open' | 'cancelled' | 'complete'; Great content though, i wasn't subscribed before but i am now! Thanks man!
@antonsakovsky58185 ай бұрын
It was really useful
@KarthikHs-y5n17 күн бұрын
this is dope
@JamesIoriatti-s9s5 ай бұрын
Hey man, great video! I have a question though when using Nextjs. I get a bundler error when using compound components like this - when used within my page.js I must declare 'use client' if the compound component file is also 'use client' - which is not the case, server components can have client components. Not a big deal, but have you experienced the same? And I hope they can find a way to fix this - likely due to compound component pieces not being default exported, yeah?
@geforcesong5 ай бұрын
great! however, i believe to keep consistence, you'd better not use this pattern unless it's really necessary.
@shakhzod__n5 ай бұрын
Useful content! Thank you bro
@vijaytembugade5 ай бұрын
Amazing video! Thank you so much
@user-eh3hn3di8x3 ай бұрын
Thank you for all these amazing videos, I wonder how can I effectively use the react dev tool profiler. I struggling making sense of it. Thank you again.
@gershymenzer62685 ай бұрын
Extremely powerful 👍
@fogguy38385 ай бұрын
amazing video
@fahedsmadi29825 ай бұрын
Love your videos, very informing
@lsaavedr4 ай бұрын
thanks!
@mooder32475 ай бұрын
More pls on this topic
@alwazkazi19165 ай бұрын
Love this!!! Thanks for this usefull info
@ShyamTala-wh2pe5 ай бұрын
it's amazing.
@iamnguyenhoanganh3 ай бұрын
make more videos like this !!!
@angletheeta5 ай бұрын
I have a question if we use nextjs, usecontext when the place we use, we have to make it as a client component how to get rid of them because most of the time the data fetch from a db so it a server component
@raphauy5 ай бұрын
Thank you
@denispilyutin48434 ай бұрын
It works well on dull component, but what if you at least had buttons with handlers ? What if you have more than 2 possible actions ? context will be enormously big.
@deanolium2 ай бұрын
Typically you don't really do it exactly like this. Instead you might have something more like CancelSave. The idea being that you let higher level component determine the interactive elements, keeping the control (and responsibility) on that layer. Take a look at things like @shadcn/ui and other component libraries to see how this pattern is meant to be used. In the version shown in this video, it has issues where you can't modify easily the layout of the posts, since you're just determining the elements to display rather than anything else. Not entirely bad, it depends on the project. However, the more typical usage is to not use context at all, but instead the parent element puts the post data in itself: {post.title} {post.description} by {post.author} The advantages here is that the parent element is relatively unconcerned about how the post is rendered, but has full control of what is rendered. For instance, if it's for previewing the post, it could just use {post.description.substring(0, 50)}... to show only the first 50 characters of the post. Of course, you trade in more complexity and responsibility in the parent component. It's always swings and roundabouts!
@sinamalakzadeh48435 ай бұрын
please create a video about rtk query as well
@JeremyMapalad5 ай бұрын
I hope you do Next.js videos as well
@Alex.Shalda5 ай бұрын
awesome
@vinitgupta16485 ай бұрын
Another Great video!! Thanks for this, but I would like to know from where do you get these information? Like where did you come across Compound Components is a Design Pattern in react?
@cosdensolutions5 ай бұрын
nowhere specific, but heard about it from multiple places online over the years, and eventually started to use it and really liked it for specific use cases
@iPankBMW19 күн бұрын
Nice video. I subscribed. Is there any other downsides?
@ashish_prajapati_tr5 ай бұрын
this is awesome
@gamingwolf33855 ай бұрын
Hello cosden , do you trust me , i was trying to do something like this , this morning Thank you my freind For next video , maybe Framer motion or some popular web motions using framer motion I don't know if i don,t have creativity or isf-motion hard to me ! 😅
@prakashsanyasi56085 ай бұрын
Thank you ❤
@snatvb5 ай бұрын
one more thing: it would be rather to have passing rest props of html element and merge classNames to have able to update in from outside. You need care about performance, {{ spot }} - will update context value and re-render every component that use it and with post prop in parent same. I thing you did't have purpose to focus on it. Just a lot of people don't really understand how they make them apps slow after look videos. I had such people on my work and they as proof used arguments - look, on this video this guy don't use memoization and smt like that))
@PeterSahanaya5 ай бұрын
react 19 be like : Are sure about that broda?
@snatvb5 ай бұрын
@@PeterSahanaya react 19 dont give you nothing for solve this, it will do react compiler :) and still you need to understand how it works and how write code correctly) but yes, most of that wont be necessary
@PeterSahanaya5 ай бұрын
@@snatvb yeaa, you're right, we still need to know what happen under the hood
@arijitRoyFullyStressedOut5 ай бұрын
thanks
@harshbhardwaj60605 ай бұрын
One example that comes to my mind is pagination component as it have many variants bases on location its used: - with previous next button and numbers - with just numbers - with dots only - with dots + any thoughts?
@renejfc2 ай бұрын
Nice one but I wouldn't use Context unless it's necessary. In the video example I don't think it is, I would just pass children with the content I want instead of having to access to the properties from Context.
@hustler26935 ай бұрын
Wow exceelent
@thaiducquang23185 ай бұрын
I have a question related to React.memo. If I use React.memo for the PostCard component, will it affect compound components?
@HBMoulvad5 ай бұрын
Aren't this gonna make all the components client components, since they are using context to get the post data? If you instead of using context, just parsed the post as props to the new components, this would get rid of having them all becone client components - right? But I like the general take on this
@mahmoudabusultan66685 ай бұрын
or just passing the content as children, for ex: {post.content}
@MrZiyak995 ай бұрын
this would mean that the post component can no longer be a server component and has to be a client component?
@Chris-cx6wl3 ай бұрын
5:46 How do you remove entire lines and selected text so quickly?
@cosdensolutions3 ай бұрын
Vim
@ifeoraokechukwu134621 күн бұрын
Hello Cosden, This is a nice video you have here. Compound Components are great patterns for ReactJS But, i feel you used ReactJS context as an overkill here. For example, PostCard.Buttons, what of i want to change the button text or i want one button that is centered in the card instead of two buttons ? See... We are right back to using those meaningless boolean props that only affect visibility of a DOM/JSX element. Compound Components work better when they start out completely headless. Also, was the use of ReactJS context absolutely necessary? I think not. It's too much overhead as useContext should mostly be use to share data across a wide area of a component tree not a small localised area of it. You could have simply used React.Children.map(...) to validate that each of the children of the PostCard component where the other ones which you defined using the `isSubChild` function. export const isSubChild = ( child: React.ReactNode, tag: string ): child is C => React.isValidElement(child) && String(child?.type).includes(tag); See example here (for isSubChild): github.com/isocroft/ReactJS_SPA_Starter-pack_plus_UI_Components/blob/main/src/components/UI_Widgets/Tabs/index.tsx Finally, naming matters in terms of the hierarchy of the UI components in a design system. i.e. Start with Card -> then, -> PostCard The design system must have a hierarchy process from subatoms -> atoms -> molecules -> organisms subatoms and atoms MUST be completely headless, while molecules can have stlying but very basic (without colors, backgrounds, box-shadows and rounded corners). Then organims can now have full styling with colors, box-shadows and all.
@rakulagn45985 ай бұрын
It's crucial to think about how the component will manage various data types and adapt to dynamic content.
@MaximeOnDev5 ай бұрын
That's such a cool solution! However, let's say I'm on the same page and I want to render the same component x times. The component is rendered using the map() method because it fetches data. For exemple I need my component to display titles for the first two instances, but not for the third. How would you approach this using compound components ?
@cosdensolutions5 ай бұрын
Just use the same pattern, and use the index to conditionally render the component.Title
@Highend7233 ай бұрын
This approach is used by chadcn components
@NahuelEstebanCastro18 күн бұрын
Why not to use Factory Pattern to create different Card components from a base Card component it would be easier and cleaner IMHO?
@Fuzbo_5 ай бұрын
Generally prefer this pattern to avoid needing to keep adjusting components to expose additional options when requirements change. However, I usually prefer to just provide the relevant props to the inner components instead of using a context provider. This also allows you to use RSC instead of client components for these components
@UkashaHacksCommunity5 ай бұрын
2nd commenter. thanks cosden. i appreciate
@GoalDigger-footboll21 күн бұрын
How i can get Source code?
@imatrules5 ай бұрын
sorry i'm new, while learning i would use interface but now i'm seeing type is it the same ? If not what's the difference?
@mryoung2053 ай бұрын
Interface is used for mainly declaring types for objects... And type is used for both
@mryoung2053 ай бұрын
E.g, types me= string, me interface{ Me: string }
@mukulbhardwaj53902 ай бұрын
Dude i love your content but can you tell me in this code you are passing entire post into every sub components.does this is not violating the design pattern?
@blyatMail5 ай бұрын
sir do you upload your courses in udemy?
@chetangarg96425 ай бұрын
how its different then just creating atomic components and building them at call site . you just have use context to reduce params, rest code is same.
@nanakwekuotoo17755 ай бұрын
Can this be used in react native
@cosdensolutions5 ай бұрын
Yes
@real_shorts_king3 ай бұрын
bro i want to buy your cource but its too expensive for india
@mohsentaheri2545Ай бұрын
"این نیز بگذرد" This too shall pass
@kantyDarius5 ай бұрын
I've to be honest.. I've been working with for more than 3 years and I have never use comp. Compns😞