Cosmic Journeys - Birth of a Black Hole 4K

[@timhoogland1397]

Always great to hear the voice of Dick Rodstein

[@PurnamadaPurnamidam]

Not alone 😊

[@adamg8061]

Thank you sir 🫶🏼

[@invader_jim2837]

Easily the best in the business. Leiv Schrieber is definitely second.

[@mickbailey5561]

Dick rod stain? Damn where was he putting it

[@Penfold101]

Best porn name in the business.

[@covert0overt_810]

OG NARRATOR IS BACK!!!!

[@deepspace67899]

I absolutely love these videos. By far my favorite space education channel.

[@infiniteformless]

Oh my God its my favourite narrator! i thought he was done. I sleep to him

[@badm0t0rf1ng3r]

Truly some classic content from SpaceRip. Reminds me of how I felt watching this channel a decade or so ago!

[@RileyBanksWho]

I was just about to tackle this jetlag! Its 6am, and im visiting family in europe 😴

[@GentlePiano-99]

The video is captivating, with content delivered clearly and engagingly!

[@NothingverseOfficial]

The gravitational force of black holes is so intense that they can bend and twist the very fabric of space and time, a phenomenon known as frame dragging.

[@Disculogic]

Space Rip documentary + Dick Rodstein's narration ❤

[@nogoodkeister]

Change the background music to something more relaxing. Most of us watch this at night.

[@michaeldebidart]

I watch these videos to fall asleep and I’ve found a sweet spot of volume where you can only focus on the narrator it definitely helps The abrupt ads are way more annoying

[@-Neo_Genesis-]

They don't make these videos, they are "ripped" from other places and then re-uploaded to KZbin.

[@rhondamathis1323]

We can see this but not the illegal immigrants at the borders

[@michaelarthur1352]

Jez

[@jibril2473]

Oh ffs 🙄

[@KidFragrance]

😂😂 is true we can't see them

[@EmilianoZapata-wj4hn]

I can send you a picture so you can see me up close

[@psquare2260]

How many people till now told you that you are not a smart person?

[@RileyBanksWho]

I’m here!❤❤

[@boydmanning3430]

A stellar mass black hole is a portal to a new universe in the multiverse and is also an imploded star.

[@rhondamathis1323]

3:11

[@nonyobiz-records]

somewhere out there they figured out how to build an actual death star

[@nonyobiz-records]

the wave function just suddenly collapsed on 'em

[@robertcook5201]

The "Cosmic maelstrom" is overall a billion billion billion times less violent and energetic than the air in your room.

[@rhondamathis1323]

Above ground

[@xmatterdaily]

What you should do is to post shorts of your videos. I dont see any shorts in this channel.

[@michaeldebidart]

Shorts are cancer

[@b.marvel6091]

If I had a Reese's Piece for every time I saw a flying bicycle with a basket...

[@kyostikallio5528]

Im not mad of the reupload ONLY because of Dick Rodstein

[@hudatolah]

Background music is too loud and not matching. 😢😢😢

[@timothy8426]

Mass is heat, and heat energy singularities don't collapse in on itself. When a star blows away, its heat energy is outgoing like any explosion. Take away heat, and you have cold space itself leftover. Heat can't penetrate pure cold repulsion of space. It can only surround it as a monopole of pure cold fabric of space itself devoid of heat energy within its core or nucleus. The event horizon perimeter is neutralized repulsion outside the perimeter spinning heat energy faster than normal momentum of space as neutralized repulsion outside the perimeter spinning all heat energy within its magnetic field like a record player centrifugal force flowing around these massive external magnetic fields don't ground currents through its nucleus or core. Physics works.

[@SuperiorDave]

Blah, blah, blah heat energy, blah, blah. If it's neutral, how would it have a repulsive force genius?

[@olddecimal2736]

Crucial

[@dipomchemistry.1218]

Something new birth into a gigantic space oh it's a majestic feeling....❤

[@kovy689]

Reuploaded video..

[@skipsch]

Some classic internet right here

[@hamentaschen]

Trippy.

[@targuscinco]

It took 30 years to figure out that the bursts of gamma rays they see are just gamma ray bursts?

[@gerry4256]

All this channel does now is repost old videos from more than a decade ago.

[@TheLondonCyclist]

So?

[@cellamuert]

@@TheLondonCyclist wym so? you gonna simp for an AI based channel? you gonna be that loser? you gonna be that guy? you gonna white knight for some random ass science channel of which you have zero knowledge of who runs it?

[@RaisedxFist]

I haven't seen this one at all.

[@derpherp4530]

Didnt you already upload this???

[@andreasfehlau4965]

Even if you repeat the old stuff a thousand times a day, Refute 5th dimensional physics and I believe you everything you want.

[@fauxcapitano6820]

Most of this video isn't what the title says. Too much fluff

[@rhondamathis1323]

Dance

[@geoffreythomas2938]

From the surface of earth point of view black holes exist for thousands of centuries. From inside a black hole point of view one second a thousand sectaries pass on the surface of earth. What if light was 200 thousand miles per second. How about 2,000 or 4,000?

[@spaghetti_monster]

The theory of relativity can be broken down, though I do not know of an example of thermodynamics breaking down. But, without direct evidence, it is only a theory that information can not be retrieved from a black hole once it crosses the event horizon. Instead of claiming “we can't”, why don't we try? Try shooting a particle beam of photons into a black hole and see if we are able to retrieve any information after it gets shredded and sucked into the black hole? lol

[@Heywoodthepeckerwood]

We can’t because the nearest known black hole (Gaia BH1) is 1,500 light years away. So, it would take 1,500 years just for the beam to get there. Then we’d have to somehow retrieve whatever happens to it. We couldn’t possibly detect the beam (if it came out, which it wouldn’t) as it would have to reflect directly back to us, which it couldn’t. (Reflecting a beam off a solid object is hard enough and at infinitesimally closer distances) If it somehow did bounce straight back to us though, it would take yet another 1,500 years to get back here. You are looking at a 3,000 year long science experiment. It would be an interesting thing to see, IF we could get close enough to one to try to capture some energy possibly leaving a black hole. But, with current space travel tech, it would take us over 30,000,000 years to get close to it.

[@AARon-m6b]

Is this an AI channel

[@HKsReelsReview]

A Must Watch Video !!

[@GoogolTVchannel]

Welcome to 'Decoding Dinosaur Extinction: 7 Unresolved Mysteries,' a thrilling journey into the depths of one of the greatest enigmas in Earth's history. In this captivating video, we explore the lingering questions and enduring puzzles surrounding the extinction of dinosaurs. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKaTmWWDbMySj9E

[@RanchosTown]

The video has nothing to do with it's TITLE until 8 minutes in.

[@brunov958]

Bedtime story! ❤ zzzzzzzz

[@gyanprakashraj4062]

DONT DO...SHIT😂😂😂

[@jabadabadu7089]

What bothers me the most about the big bang theory is that suggests our position as center of the Universe. In any direction we look the Universe is 13.7 billion years old. So we again think as the center of everything. What if Universe is maybe shaped like a fog? And we are somewhere inside?

[@poonsamurai]

You’re confusing the visible universe with the entire universe. Big bang does not imply that we are in any way in the center, 13.7 billion years is simply the estimated age, not size. Plenty of good explanations on YT and elsewhere if you want to search around. Jason Kendall has a good lecture video about it.

[@jabadabadu7089]

@@poonsamurai ''You’re confusing the visible universe with the entire universe.'' Can you explain that sentence? From wikipedia: ''the distance to the edge of the observable universe is roughly the same in every direction'' That implies to what?

[@poonsamurai]

@@jabadabadu7089 visible universe - the spherical portion the entire universe where there has been enough time for light to reach us since the “big bang.” Each point in the universe will have its own observable universe It implies that any observer will perceive themselves to be at the center of their own visible universe that is equidistant in all directions. Basically everyone gets their own bubble depending on where they’re located in the universe and it’ll be the same size and make it appear like they’re at the center of it.

[@jabadabadu7089]

@@poonsamurai I understand that theory and again we start putting ourselves in the center of Universe. We did that once in the past and proved us wrong. I'm not denying Big bang theory, I'm trying to look at the Universe from a different perspective and that is not being in the center. I can be completely wrong, but it needs to be proven. Otherwise present model is pretty good in explaining space around us. We will most likely never know what Universe actually is. Maybe Universe is an atom and we live inside. That's even more crazy idea 😁

[@SuperiorDave]

We are at the center of our visible bubble. Put down the pipe, and step away.