4:41 France itself was also against this proposal, even Talleyrands own dad said it was ridiculous
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
It truly seems like a crazy idea
@sefyaa Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge ignoring the fact that spain is united still somehow
@caifothiazz Жыл бұрын
As a Czech who actually studied history, this is the first time I hear this.
@xxxdeber7080 Жыл бұрын
Same
@asdasd-wx9qf Жыл бұрын
Władysław Sikorski (Polish prime minister in exile) in diplomatic corespodency in 1941 "In case there is an internal breakdown of Germany before the end of the war my country demands to stop Russia Soviet Union, until we regain the borders before-military on the current demarcation line2. With this more- I welcome the announcement that it will stop.- manie further March of the Red Army to the West it fully corresponds to the interests of Czechoslovakia. I think so that we have the right to count on her positive attitude to these issues that will undoubtedly be raised in the course of the Taken, and so well developing talks on a future Federation of the two States.
@Minamoto_1 Жыл бұрын
It was possible but of course russians and americans had to ruin it
@adrumasahead2815 Жыл бұрын
What do you think of it?
@Fnupo Жыл бұрын
Yeah, although I knew about this proposal, I rly wouldn't call it country that "almost" existed, there were lot of crazy proposals. God, I would say even proposal of Czechoslovak corridor was more realistic than Polish-Czechoslovak union.
@musicodrome1731 Жыл бұрын
There is one country that almost existed that is very unknown and almost always forgotten : The Arab Islamic Republic, unification of Tunisia and Libya. Both presidents of Tunisia and Libya agreed upon that project and on the modalities. Actually, it was pretty imminent and the project would have been summited to a referundum. The reasons of cancellation the unification, before that referundum, are not exactlty known. Though, it is important to know that Algeria and Egypt didn't agree at all with that project, the combination of the natural ressources of Libya and the intellectual elite of tunisia could have resulted with a new big power in the region that would have threaten there position. So, Algeria and Egypt acted very aggressively towards both country, Algeria even threatened to invade Tunisia if the project went on. Divergence of viewpoint on the project, and the unclear position of France didn't help.
@lqr824 Жыл бұрын
I'm sure you know but it seems most people don't realize Egypt and Syria were kind of one country for a while. (Was it really a country? Or a union of two countries?) And, Russia and Belarus have been combined in a "Union State" for over a decade that I think is stronger than the EU, or could be, but not as strong as USSR in terms of how joined the parts are.
@InvagPrune Жыл бұрын
@@lqr824 The UAR was a country indeed but given the political issues in the middle East at the time and the fact they did not massively promote the change, it was not very noticeable to the rest of the world and collapsed of it own issues anyway. As far as I can tell, the Belarus-Russia union is a similar attempt but notably was not a country, starting as an agreement over economic and military cooperation and eventually stagnating after not very long when the balance of power shifted to Putin and the internal structure was not fulfilled. Although, I believe it never officially died and was just considered abandoned after Belarusian hostilities towards Russia in the late 2000s
@ammarthegreat Жыл бұрын
@@lqr824 the united arab republic was effectively egypt controlling syria which is why it eventually failed with syria leaving the union. pan arab efforts typically fall apart due to competing interests and ultimately someone always wanted to be in charge
@eVill420 Жыл бұрын
@@lqr824 Russia and Belarus are not a union state, Lukashenko isn't a puppet of Putin, he just very heavily relies on him. you can see that they have autonomy considering they refused to attack Ukraine
@lqr824 Жыл бұрын
@@eVill420 This page has been around since 2004 in 37 languages and you say it is not true? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_State
@TheLordZorga Жыл бұрын
A note on the Slesvig-Holsten part, Slesvig was actually majority Danish, but more like around 60% danish to 40% german, so not by a lot, but still, to say the entirety was german was populated by germans is disingenuous. This was even the reason Denmark tried to unite with Slesvig only, because they wanted to create a nationstate that only included the danish, while giving the germans in Holsten to Germany (Prussia). Though the germans would use this splitting of the duchy as justification to take over the entirety of Slesvig-Holsten, as splitting the duchy was made illegal by the great powers after the first Slesvig-Holsten war. So the nationalist danish government really played itself, though we were reunited with our Danish brothers again, though only after the first world war, unfortunately.
@otakuofmine Жыл бұрын
Schleswig-Holstein. And it was true, i think they even let them vote and they voted Denmark (The Schleswig Part). Would have certainly had a better time if part of denmark.
@NeulandInternet Жыл бұрын
@@otakuofmine Today's borders reflect the vote of 1920. The vote was carried out in different voting districts. The districts that voted for Germany became part of Germany and the danish-voting districts became part of Denmark. So the border is quite accurate I'd say. Though it's always a difficult question how to draw a border, as both ethnicities are scattered all over the territories.
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
Germany & Prussia really are not the same Country.
@otakuofmine Жыл бұрын
@@shonenjumpmagneto Prussia Was de facto the german empire at that time. they won the leader bit against austria-hungary
@AugustKjelmannNielsen5 ай бұрын
@@otakuofmineslesvig-holsten is accurate in danish
@veroist_ Жыл бұрын
Seeing Zapadoslavia exist would be beautiful. 🇸🇰
@ElzariusUnity Жыл бұрын
To bad Czech government was most likely still salty with Poles at the time.
@vandydev2292 Жыл бұрын
Pan-Slavic Federation be more beautiful ❤
@cesarzpontu8886 Жыл бұрын
@@vandydev2292 no it wouldn't
@kaiser_landschaft7941 Жыл бұрын
@@vandydev2292 Western slavs are different.
@atlantic.oficial Жыл бұрын
I was about to say that
@HistoryUniversity Жыл бұрын
QUESTION: Is it better to almost exist or exist for so short that you're forgotten like Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic???
@edwardblair4096 Жыл бұрын
I'm thinking that that proposal happened around the end of WW1 with the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Empire leaving power gap in a short window of time. Don't forget that there was oil in the region. Once the Russian civil war was settled, the red army and bolshovic(sp) communists took control and the area became part of the USSR.
@khvichakuprashvili6719 Жыл бұрын
It was politically too unstable to exist longer. 3 main ethnic groups living in the republic had different ideas, especially Armenians and Georgians on the one side and Azerbaijanis on the other. Azeris welcomed Turkish forces annexing some parts of the republic while Georgians and Armenians were against it, obviously.
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
Context matters.
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
@Prehistoric Postmodernist it's a country that existed & it united The Caucasian Subcontinent more or less before being annexed by The USSR.
@khvichakuprashvili6719 Жыл бұрын
@@shonenjumpmagneto Nope, the state was dissolved before Bolshevik annexations.
@cybervet3678 Жыл бұрын
Just some quick corrections: 9:34 that's not the flag of the first Mexican Empire, is the flag of the army of the three guarantees, that was the army that lead mexico to independence from spain, even some parts of the modern Mexican Army uses that flag/seal. The flag of the Mexican Empire was almost like the modern day mexico's flag but with a different coat of arms with the eagle being in a diferent pose and having a crown in the head of the eagle. 10:05 that map of the Federal Republic of Central America is incorrect, because Panama and the Yucatan peninsula were never part of the Federal Republic of Central America. Even tho Yucatan were once an independent nation, never joined central america.
@unifiedhorizons2663 Жыл бұрын
bro that sounds cool as hell, a GOLDEN EAGLE CROWNED
@Rynewulf4 ай бұрын
I believe they were at times claimed by the Federation for the same reason the places in modern Chiapas were, due to claiming succession from the Captaincy General of Guatemala, whose colonial era borders with Mexico and New Granada were poorly defined (I believe the border disputes across South America started a similar way, iffy border details between internal Spanish colonies and sometimes other nations too)
@averagebohemian5791 Жыл бұрын
I would love a federation with Poles, I love Poland so much
@ssh0ck138 Жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t mind a federation with Czechs and Slovaks, we are similar so it could work, love Czechia from Poland 🇵🇱❤️🇨🇿
@Animatron11 Жыл бұрын
Wish we could have something together to actually matter more globally!
@averagebohemian5791 Жыл бұрын
@@Animatron11 Zapadoslavia NOW!
@czaszaprzeszly371 Жыл бұрын
In 1922 it could be great. Big Czechs industry + lot of Polish + coal from Silesia and Gdańsk/Gdynia.
@averagebohemian5791 Жыл бұрын
@@czaszaprzeszly371 Czech tanks and Polish cavalry would be a very good combination
@stevejohnson3357 Жыл бұрын
The proposals for the middle east are the most interesting but still doomed. Sometimes these things cannot be imposed. They have to work on the ground.
@ammarelatreece9584 Жыл бұрын
The best solution for peace in the middle east is full unity
@milesmcallister8542 Жыл бұрын
@@ammarelatreece9584 the real best is to remove the middle east
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Agreed, it's easy to draw borders without taking into consideration the people
@mappingshaman5280 Жыл бұрын
@@ammarelatreece9584not really. Arabs, Iranians, turks, sunnis, shias, etc putting them all in one state isn't going to work. Maybe if it was just all arab sunnis but it's not
@Juiceeway Жыл бұрын
@@mappingshaman5280 bruh all the khalifates were mixed population, so what are you talking about? We are divided because of Israel and America remove these two and we will be united again
@mariovallanzasca9454 Жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in a parallel universe, countries that almost existed: Belgium
@yodorob Жыл бұрын
Also, Israel. Here in our universe, it was only a combination of many contingencies that paved the way for the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, and - even more importantly - its endurance until this very day.
@enoch-anthonynyanzu234510 ай бұрын
Don't forget Turkey and Azerbaijan
@makikoha Жыл бұрын
The kingdom of Finland could be classified as a country that almost existed. After gaining independence in 1917, finland considered a monarchy for a government type, much like sweden, with a german king, but germany lost the war and Finland didn't really think it wouldve been a good idea so they ended up going with a presidential republic instead
@vesi908 Жыл бұрын
As a pole I love when foreigners are trying to say "międzymorze". Perfection 😄
@C6Fever11 ай бұрын
As an Armenian i can say the only language I find more difficult than Armenian is Polish! :p
@dawidblachowski Жыл бұрын
There was almost another country: Silesia. Just after I World War, upon leadership of Josef Kożdoń, the movement gained approval from Czechoslovakia, UK and USA. With Polish and French disapproval, it never come into existence, the national plebiscite of march 1923 didn't include Independent SIlesia as the option, so Silesians in majority of votes (64%) voted to reimain in Germany (not join Poland).
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
I didn't know that! Very interesting
@braziliantsar Жыл бұрын
Damn they wanted to massacre Germany even more
@cesarzpontu8886 Жыл бұрын
But plebiscite was in 1921
@dawidblachowski Жыл бұрын
Sorry, typo, yes it was in 1921.
@thorspoczta4436 Жыл бұрын
Bullshit. This voting was like voting in Belarus for Łukaszenko. German prank during Poland occupation time.
@jtgd Жыл бұрын
My favorite is the Union between Francia and Byzantium
@jonbud Жыл бұрын
Glad you mentioned Slesvig-Holsten/Schleswig-Holstein as im a dane myself facinated by that part of my danish history :)
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
It's a very interesting territory!
@NameName-dx8lb Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge There were also many issues with the territory division. Mainly with Tondern.
@stevyyjay85 Жыл бұрын
I'm a Schleswig-Holsteiner
@jonbud Жыл бұрын
@@stevyyjay85 i feel like Denmark and Germany have been very mature about their borders compared to other places. We live in peace with each other and i think that is kinda beautiful :)
@mom0nline408 Жыл бұрын
I Live in Schleswig-Holstein and we are learning danish in school
@Lemonz1989 Жыл бұрын
The Danish Faroe Islands also almost became a new country in 1946. They voted in favor of independence, but the Danish king annulled the vote, and the Faroese gained partial autonomy in 1948 instead.
@NobodyNobody0000 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the effort you put into your videos General Knowledge! It's great that you care about the quality of your work. You're well spoken and do a good job with your narration in addition to including relevant maps and related visuals. Since you handle the presentation so well it makes the information more digestible. Overall, excellent work! Echoing the other comments I saw asking for the Wilsonian video idea you mentioned. Unfortunately these days it seems like people take self-determination for granted and don't realize what a major paradigm shift it was for humanity to go from empires ruling others being the norm to being perceived as a negative thing. It'd be great to hear what you have to say about how the 14 points would have affected the world historically, not only for just changing borders but also things like the hope that reducing armaments and creating the League of Nations would prevent future wars. It'd be interesting to see how you think the world would have ended up today if those things had worked and there wasn't a WWII. It was definitely a very hopeful outlook for the world at the time. Also, it's impressive how productive you are putting out so many videos! Something I saw some comments about were various corrections about things like specific flags or maps, and it seems like mistakes are bound to happen trying to keep an upload schedule that satisfies KZbin's algorithm. Both in the interest of historical accuracy, combating historical revisionism and giving your channel more content, have you considered making a video about corrections to your other videos? It's something I've seen other content creators do and it gives a good reason to link to a bunch of your other videos which may get you more views there too. In any case, thanks for sharing your videos! Best of luck with everything!
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
Did you really just advocate for The 2nd Age of Empires replacing The Age of Republics & The Age of Organizations (present day)?
@DehydratedDarkness Жыл бұрын
Polish-Czechoslovak confederation was actually older, the governments have sought to implement it before WW2, but there was some disagreement over the degree of integration, Poland wanted a federation while Czechoslovakia opted for a confederation. Some documents promising formation were signed, but the talks were going at a sluggish pace and WW2 happened It's also weird to talk about it without mentioning the sister proposal of Yugoslavia-Greece confederation which didn't work out despite both governments being eager, due to Yugoslav communists taking power. They were actually supposed to be united with Poland-Czechoslovakia in the final phase, along with Bulgaria and Romanian added somewhere along the way. This was actually the allied vision for central and southern Europe, it probably would have happened if not for Soviet interference
@quranicbard7881 Жыл бұрын
Happy St Patrick's Day, General Knowledge! Oh by the way, can you make a video on where Oceanian Countries Get Their Names!
@josueveguilla9069 Жыл бұрын
Happy St. Patrick's day to you, too, General Knowledge 🍀
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Happy Saint Patrick's day!
@josueveguilla9069 Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge Thank you.
@sanjarsocool Жыл бұрын
the united Bengal plan hurts so much that it didn't happen and all we got was unnecessary violence of neighbors cuz of fabricated religious issues. Would've been a more develop country then Bangladesh today
@actuallyazurite Жыл бұрын
the fact that you included all of these countries but no quebec is crazy, good vid tho! i had no clue that this many regions had wanted to become countries on their own at some point!
@Illjwamh Жыл бұрын
"Countries that almost didn't exist" sounds like a really interesting idea for a video. Sort of a "for want of a nail" kind of thing.
@pk6923 Жыл бұрын
yeah, that would be super interesting to see :D
@shk439 Жыл бұрын
Could you make a video about countries that almost existed during the Russian Civil War?
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
OOOOOO THAT'S A GOOD ONE. *The Free Territory Anarchy* & all that shit!
@ElzariusUnity Жыл бұрын
That doesn't count. They existed. Just not for very long =D
@rasmuslundsnnichsen4984 Жыл бұрын
While on the topic of Slesvig-*H*olsten - its worth mentioning the island of Als (or Alsen in german), which was independent from 6th to 9th november 1918.
@3seven5seven1nine9 Жыл бұрын
It feels insane that the US projected so much power across the ocean in 1917 that they could write up a wishlist of how they want Europe to look, and get a good amount of it done
@scottabc72 Жыл бұрын
The US was becoming more influential at the time but it was more important that it was seen as a neutral party that had no colonial plans on the regions in question and didnt have strong favorites among the colonial powers that did have plans in the region.
@hoomanben8455 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, more than projected power they were seen as a neutral player and arguably more importantly were the middle point between Britain and France on a lot of debates meaning in the interests of compromise their decision often was chosen, it also helped that they were the least beleaguered by the war, meaning powers that would normally object couldn’t afford to do so
@mrbisshie Жыл бұрын
Woodrow Wilson's 14 points was actually pretty good, and probably would have prevented another world war, if most of them were actually implemented. Point number 1 was to stop with bs secret treaties.
@jamesedward8090 Жыл бұрын
Just to clarify, Panama was never part of the Federal Republic of Central America. After Panama's independence from Spain, they joined Gran Colombia. (Map at 10:08)
@tirdy3981 Жыл бұрын
The Malphilindo confederation consists Malaysia, Philippines, and Indonesia. edit: It almost existed but it didn't.
@anthonyminimum Жыл бұрын
0:37 I actually came up with a name for this almost country a few years ago, I called it Czechopolslovakia or the land of Czechs, Pols and Slovaks
@veroist_ Жыл бұрын
Or Zapadoslavia
@tomasvrabec1845 Жыл бұрын
Zapadoslavia is the traditional name. Because it's not just Poles, Czechs and Slovaks. A few more Slavic people's, especially western Slavs are there to. Hence WesterSlavia. Akin to Yugaslavia (south slávia)
@Salv2137 Жыл бұрын
1.there is a joke in Poland to declare a war on Czechia and immediately unconditionally surrender
@tomaszsyrek3728 Жыл бұрын
A to nie było o Szwecji w czasie PRL-u?
@thatguyswavomeer Жыл бұрын
International name for Międzymorze is Intermarium. You're welcome! :) As for countries that almost existed, shortly after 1945 some groups in Poland were pushing for creation of an new Lusatian state that would be carved out of what is now parts of eastern Germany.
@ternet1859 Жыл бұрын
There was a movement supporting the idea in Czechoslovakia as well, to liberate the last enslaved slavs.
@cristiciocan660 Жыл бұрын
Please, can you make the video about Woodrow Wilson's plans?
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Yes!
@coquimarinero7246 Жыл бұрын
Seconded. A Wilson's proposed borders video could be a lot of fun
@EmperorOfDrill Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge PLEASE OTTOMAN DESTORY ARMENİANS GREEK AND CREATED NEW TURKİSH STATE.
@IdiotBoxProductionsTV Жыл бұрын
Deutschland: Polish Czech can’t hurt you Polish Czechia:
@jhaarbur Жыл бұрын
Some other countries that almost existed: 1. Amekijo/Neutral Moresnet - Would have been world's only Esperanto-speaking nation. 2. Russian Democratic Fedarative Republic - Lasted only 6 hours 3. Republic of Carpatho-Ukraine - Lasted 1 day before being conqured by Hungry. 4. Republic of Canada - Existed for 1 year on Navy Island; not to be confused with the actual country of Canada itself, as this was an alternate, de facto government. 5. Intermarium - A union of all of Eastern Europe that would have been a buffer between Germany and Russia
@TurkiyeBall3910 Жыл бұрын
Bro is try to killing Türkiye 💀💀💀
@AIeksejs Жыл бұрын
I would love to see a video about the Frisian regions and stuff of like the Interfrisian Council. it is a really interesting topic IMO but not that well known
@Kurogane-san Жыл бұрын
Could you make a video about countries that almost existed within the Brazilian Territory? Few examples: Confederação do Equador, República do Acre, República Juliana, República Rio-Grandense and the São Paulo separatist movement.
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Great idea!
@KartingRules Жыл бұрын
Território Livre de Princesa
@Kasaaz Жыл бұрын
The Schleswig-Holstein part makes me wonder whatever happened to Dithmarschen as a political unit there?
@tefky7964 Жыл бұрын
Its sad, but expected, that Polish-Czechoslovak confederation didn´t happen, our governments weren´t exactly the best friends in that time. But I don´t lose hope that one day, there will be unified Zapadoslavia!
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Do you think it could have worked then? Or now?
@tefky7964 Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge Generaly speaking,we are neighbors, our languages are similar, so we can quite well communicate while each of us can talk to each other in our native language and they understand most of it (which would probably get even better over time), but there are cultural differences and,atleast today, religious differences, which might cause problems. But I don´t think that it would be that big problem. Anyway, by then, main progress to form confederation was done during the war. Although our president did his best to sabotage the confederation and boost relations with Soviets, even if negotiations were successful, Soviets were nemesis of Poles, yet Soviets got control of Poland, while Polish government in exile lost support of the allies and as Soviets were very much against the confederation (too big danger), they probably wouldn´t let that happen anyway. Also as the new country would have to be in that case communist pupet of the USSR, allies wouldn´t care by that time anyway too and wouldn´t support it either. By now, I think that we have better relations than ever, open borders helped a lot by people more casually visiting our neighbours and as we share scepticism towards West and the East (we don´t blame Poles for invasion of 1968, we see them as "co-sufferers" under the USSR), I think that common country might be possible and people more willing to overlook some problems just to prevent being small powerless country. Not exactly with strong centralized power, but atleast something. Also I would like to be once again in the same country with Slovaks. Czechoslovakia ended just thanks to politicians ignoring the will of the people and unresolved issues ignored for dozens of years by socialist government. I am glad that atleast we all are part of the EU and V4, but I hope for even bigger cooperation among our countries.
@MrToradragon Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge Back then probably not. All countries around Czechoslovakia were either full blown totalitarian states or at least had authoritarian tendencies, while Czechoslovakia had remained highly democratic state. Today the situation is different. I would say that after some reforms some union of Czechia and Poland could happen even thou Poland is now more interested in Ukraine. But as things are changing in Europe and Poland is turning into emerging power and perhaps new block will form, it would be perhaps good idea for Czechia to be included into this new block that would later perhaps transform into some sort of (con)federation. I would say that there is some chance that some new entity that will be more representative of interests of countries in Central Europe and Baltics will form. And i hope, that Czechia will be part of this new entity.
@tomasvrabec1845 Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledge I think it's part of the overarching Slavic Culture that is seeping through from the past. Slavs used to be Ethno-religious group. The religion was about nature, family and Genealogy (generational relationships, kinship ext). Both the religion and the language were very old and evolved and diversified far slower than other langauges Christianity slowly replaced this fairs and created a new form of Christianity called Double faith... As no one could just stop being the old faith. Hence why even today in Poland you see far far far more concentration of different saints and the trinity. Meanwhile even just in western Europe It's about God, or the trinity but all else are more like accomplished scholars rather than nearly divine beings... But what I mean is. As we became Etho Linguistic group only. The slow diversification still keeps us united. And every century since there was some revival or rebelion trying to preserve. Time and time again we come to embrace the similarity nad call ourselves kin.
@Rolando95 Жыл бұрын
@@MrToradragon It would be a really powerfull country with Prague, Warsaw, Gdańsk, Kraków, Wrocław, Brno, Bratysława. One of the most if not most beautifull country in Europe! :)
@armanbatikian2946 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video, it is cool and informative as usual ! I’m Armenian 🇦🇲we call the first Armenian republic mentioned in the video the United Armenia as after centuries of division between empires Eastern and Western Armenias would unite again. Whereas Greater Armenia is more referred to the Ancient Kingdom of Armenia!
@irani544 Жыл бұрын
We love and support Armenia
@mohannadkhalil2577 Жыл бұрын
❤️☀️💚
@paulochon7692 Жыл бұрын
I love Armenia from France 🇨🇵❤️🇦🇲 Hope you survive 🥺
@wandilismus8726 Жыл бұрын
Born in the Schleswig Part of Schleswig-Holstein, in Husum. Now living in Kiel, which is Holstein. We have a danish minority here. The Süd Schleswigscher Wählerverbund doesn't need to have 5% to get into the Landtag and this time the Bundestag.
@julianosvonskingrad7009 Жыл бұрын
Just came here for Schleswig-Holstein. Greetings from Schleswig-Holstein!
@constantinethegreat7434 Жыл бұрын
Pontus also became briefly independent after the 4th crusade as a greek kingdom
@ntonisa6636 Жыл бұрын
By briefly you mean close to 260 years (longer than Greece has lasted so far)
@xpictos777 Жыл бұрын
The Pontian genocide by Turkey is one of the least known crimes against humanity.
@borakaraca9788 Жыл бұрын
you forgot ottoman genocide against dinasours yeah thats right we killed all the t-rex population and also we killed all the jupiterians when they come earth
@rimelesnel1678 Жыл бұрын
Genocide my ass
@NaufalNasrullah-c4y Жыл бұрын
Melayu Raya - the unification of Malaysia, Indoensia, Singapore, Brunei and Timur Leste based on the united usage of the Malay language in the archipelago but was abandoned due to conflicting political rivalry between Malaysia and Indonesia politicians as well as the administrative nightmare the country of that size would create
@TheGeographyGeeks7 ай бұрын
I love your videos!!!
@mariajoaoferrazdeabreu150 Жыл бұрын
Great video.
@ChrisFan890 Жыл бұрын
Happy St. Patrick's Day!
@oscarmedina9669 Жыл бұрын
Polish - Cezchoslovak Confederation ---> Name proposals: Weslavia (West + Slavia) /Czeposlovakia/ Poczeslavia
@modmaker7617 Жыл бұрын
Yugoslavia - South Slavia. Jug means South in Slavic. So Zapadoslavia. Zapad means West in Slavic.
@DragonTheOne Жыл бұрын
Now we need eastslavia
@modmaker7617 Жыл бұрын
@@DragonTheOne The USSR is already an East-Slavia.
@johnwayne6112 Жыл бұрын
Why change name? How about "Poland"?
@modmaker7617 Жыл бұрын
@@johnwayne6112 It's not Poland but a Polish-Czechoslovak Union
@albertskyking Жыл бұрын
Excellent video, I learned some I was not aware of. I want to mention a country that almost existed, here where I am from. The region where I live is called The Rio Grande Valley of South Texas (disclaimer: it is not a valley). This region is presently part of Texas, but it was not really part of the Texan Republic during it's independence, instead it was part of the province of Nuevo Santander in Mexico (now the Mexican state of Tamaulipas). For a brief period, I believe 10 months, there existed a Spanish-speaking republic called La Republica del Rio Grande (The Republic of the Rio Grande), the capital was Laredo. The city of Laredo, Texas still uses the country's flag as it's city flag. I do not know if it counts as a country that nearly existed, but it did for a brief period of time during the formation of the current American countries. Parts of The Republic of the Rio Grande are now on both sides of the USA and Mexico border.
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
It did exist. So it wouldn't qualify for the list here. Recognition of sovereignty & sovereignty are 2 separate boxes to check for being a Country.
@MoLauer Жыл бұрын
I am from Sleeswig-Holstiin and I think the idea of independence isn't that weird, because although it is a part of Germany today, it has a unique mix of North German, North Frisian and Danish culture, that is very distinct from the rest of Germany. Also we wouldn't have to deal with Bavaria anymore...
@IceGuadian Жыл бұрын
i predict that belgium where i live will split up into 2 maybe 3 in the next 10-15 years
@camdenpetros5129 Жыл бұрын
Independent Flanders would be cool to see
@gevorgnersesyan4177 Жыл бұрын
The Treaty of Sevres is anything but crazy. Regarding the Wilsonian Armenia it was proposed to unite the Armenian population (the majority there from thousands of years back to 1917, the Armenian genocide) in their historic lands especially since 1.5 million Armenians were executed there a few years prior to the proposal.
@akanay22 Жыл бұрын
No, it is actually one of the most ridicilous treaties to ever exist. Its only purpose was to divide and weaken anatolia even if it had no reason for it. It is merely your nationalist blindness that prevents you from seeing the truth. What right does France, Italy and Britain have on Anatolia allowing them to share its soil? Or why would the Turks have to share their rights on strait of Istanbul with countries thousands of kilometers away from it? Not talking about İzmir or East Anatolia as its more complicated than a few sentences but with these nonsense alone, you should be able to see the bullshit that treaty of sevres was. And about that other thing, before even talking about it being a genocide or not, do you have a single reliable source that says it was exactly 1.5 million? armenians
@paulochon7692 Жыл бұрын
@@akanay22 stop being negationist. You just can't deny history. It happened but now we have to move on, accept the past and improve relations for the future. We don't want wars and massacres again
@akanay22 Жыл бұрын
@@paulochon7692 The only thing I asked for was a source and you failed to provide even that.
@MaceY._. Жыл бұрын
Nah, that Polish-Czechoslovak Confederation couldn't make it. The Czechs (and the slovaks) hate the Poles. They wanted their terretories and they didn't help them in the Soviet-Polish war. They didn't even let the Hungarian volunteer soldiers through their boreders so Hungary only could send ammo through Romania (because Czechs asked Romania to also block the Hungarian soldiers, but they let in the ammos)
@ontyyyy Жыл бұрын
Czechoslovak-Polish confederacy would be a bad idea. At the time the two nations had cold relations and IMHO the Polish goverment was so much in support of this, because it would be a nation with Polish majority (30 to 13 million)
@cosmosheep4306 Жыл бұрын
United Bengal 💔
@johnstevenson22 Жыл бұрын
I think the treaty of sevres if implented couldve worked well.
@Laufer88 Жыл бұрын
There was also plan for making Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia united, but Hungary did not want to exchange part of its territory so there'll be land parts connected between Czechoslovaks and Yugoslavs...Just after the WW1.
@thegreekguy1124 Жыл бұрын
The Pontic Greeks did faught and held their lands and they would have been independent or a part of Greece if the political split of Greece(which inevitably resulted to a collapse of the Anatolian front)hadn't happened
@dunyaakl8952 Жыл бұрын
Yet they represent the far right islamist society in turkey,how ironic. Their mindset is as bigot as greeks are,guess it is in their genetics.
@Moravian_Mf Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't mind being with Poles as a Czech 🇵🇱♥️🇨🇿♥️🇸🇰
@patrikhanousek6633 Жыл бұрын
The polish-cehoslovakian union got me wondering how whud that changed my life (I am cech)
@modmaker7617 Жыл бұрын
Imagine a Zapadoslavia. That be interesting. Would it just be Yugoslavia or will it be better?
@tefky7964 Жыл бұрын
@@modmaker7617 Without centuries old grievances, less conflicts over borders and less "hot-headed" population it might be more stable.
@yankychannels Жыл бұрын
The republic of Pontus would be cool
@samtheman4931 Жыл бұрын
Yes but the Turks genocided all the Greeks living there
@turkishfront Жыл бұрын
@@samtheman4931 No, Turks in Greece and Greeks in Turkey were exchanged at the request of the Greeks. If the Turks were genocidal, you wouldn't be able to find a single Greek who lived under Turks rule for 400 years. Now that you're getting boring, genocide may be normal for you, but not for us.
@mariosbardis4831 Жыл бұрын
@@samtheman4931 not all of them. Some converted to Islam (there are still Greek speakers in Pontus but they are Muslim) other were saved by sympathetic Turks, and others went to the Pontic Alps for a guerrilla war, and saved as much as they could up until population exchange. Pontic Greek still spoken in villages settled by Pontics in North Greece
@mariosbardis4831 Жыл бұрын
@@turkishfront sad part is all evidence about the genocides comes from Ottoman recordals, yet Turkey doesnt recognise them. Its not a plan to make Turkey look bad, after all it was a war and these were actions by some rogue generals ( mostly the three Pashas) and angry population. It was a weird time, Greece was in constant war from 1912-1922. But the genocides happened, thank God the Ottomans kept records of who they killed and how they killed them, and which villages they destroyed.
@jeremiedomenico Жыл бұрын
No mention of Québec? 😢⚜️💙 I remember 1995 ...
@Threezi04 Жыл бұрын
The Miskito kingdom had an actual unifying king though, how does that not make them a kingdom?
@grimlemngr2605 Жыл бұрын
Plz make that widrow Wilson plan vid
@BOSS_OFFICIAL_atheist Жыл бұрын
As a bengali, no we are indian, proud to be indian, we are reall bengal, 🚩🚩
@ColapsMental Жыл бұрын
Forgot about Banat republic
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Which one was that?
@Apes_Together_Stronk Жыл бұрын
@@General.Knowledgeduring the Hungarian revolution the area of what is now Vojodojnia and Romanian Vojodojnia declared independence,before being briefly swept under the carpet by the Jugoslavs and Romanians.
@Mang0Loco Жыл бұрын
wouldve loved to see Big Armenia and a United Bengal. I would assume Greek and Armenian relations would have to be pretty good for it to work. United Bengal just has awesome looking borders
@jehandesains8674 Жыл бұрын
Here's a concept: WHAT IF after the "belgian" revolution in 1830, they DID make the Free State of Antwerp, and divided the area according to the Flahaut plan? What would this have changed for the Franco-Prussian war, and especially WWI? In the real timeline, we know that the Franco-Prussian war was a success for Prussia, and that the danger of invasion caused Belgium to modernise and restructure its military, and prepare defences. In WWI, while they were neutral, they got invaded by the Germans, and these defences that had been built, managed to slow the advance of the Germans. Later, in WWII, despite being neutral again, Germany swept through the Ardennes, and quickly took all of Belgium on their way to Paris. But what if it was just the Free State of Antwerp? They wouldn't have that much of a concern in the Franco-Prussian war, probably due to strong British influence. In WWI, the scenario might be tricky, because the Germans could either have ignored Antwerp and gone beside it, or it would've been a crucial point for British troops and would've been heavily defended. Assuming, of course, the Franco-Prussian war didn't annex part of modern-day Belgium. In WWII, the blitzkrieg wouldn't have needed to go through Antwerp, but again it could be a vital port for the Allies.
@petterbirgersson4489 Жыл бұрын
A fertile crecent federation should be created today. Stronger than Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Jordan individually.
@MrLeemurman Жыл бұрын
❤
@plrc4593 Жыл бұрын
I woudn't mind if some Polish-Czech-Slovak Confederation/Federation (Polish-Czech-Slovak Commonwealth 😎) comes to fruition. It would empower these countries compared to Germany, Russia, France etc. I'm in favour of sensible integration, i.e. I object some utopian projects like the United States of Europe which are mad, but support reasonable integration of areas inhabited by similar people with similar history and common interests. Such Polish-Czech-Slovak Confederation/Federation is impossible today, but maybe it will be possible in 30-50 years? Who knows. In 50 years people of our countires may perseive themselves mainly as inhabitants of central Europe.
@wensdyy6466 Жыл бұрын
I really dont think putting together Poland with really high number of people beliving in god (and all the things that relate to that-abortions, LGBTQA+ rights...) and Czechia which is one of the most atheistic country on the planet (with easy acess to abortions, laws protecting LGBTQA+ community, strong rule of law, enviromental laws supporting not using coal...). I really don´t see this as possible and it would only create tensions (as poles would outnumber czechs which would lead to them having more power and we still hate having been ruled by someone else and there are still strong feelings to any form of decisions that are "about us but without us" as it was during WW2 and Munich Agreement or Munich beetrail as we call it)
@plrc4593 Жыл бұрын
@@wensdyy6466 strong rule of law, not using coal xDD Dude, you're talking about country ruled untill recently by an oligarch Babis with support of not reformed communist party xD About country that is number 7 in Euope in production of coal with 17.3 mln tones of oil equivalent, whereas Poland produces 55 mln tones (but is 4 times bigger).
@wensdyy6466 Жыл бұрын
@@plrc4593 well communist have about 3,6% (they did not get in the parlament in 2021 and it is highly unlikley they will ever get back) and most of them are people with really high age=they are dying out(even the curent leader of cumunist party said that is only a matter of time before their members die out and there is nothing they can do about it). Babis LOST in parlament elections, his political party LOST senat election, Babiš himself LOST in president election. Our judges are alow to express their opinion and criticise the gowerment-in Poland they cannot (there could be criminal preceedings started, they can be placed out of service and not alowed to continue their work or ger reduction of sallary just because they express their opinion). Also I do not really care that there are countries who produce more coal than Poland because I was comparing Poland and Czech Republic (I mean poland is not even capable of respecting us now-Turów mine is the reason A LOT of czech citizens lost water and suffer from pollution and do not even get me started about the polutin in czech part of Silesia that has the majority source in Poland . I can also mention the fragmentation of rivers making for example ouf efforts of reintroducing eels and salomons in vain because no matter how many fish crossings we bulid nad make our rivers easy for these animals to migrate Poland does NOTHING so the eels end up choped to pieces in your water damms that lack of any fish crossings...shall I continue or do you get the picture?)
@plrc4593 Жыл бұрын
@@wensdyy6466 I assure you that judges in Poland can criticize government in Poland and they do it pretty darn ofen :) Are you aware that right next to Turów there is a lot of even bigger coal mines both in Germany and the Czech Republic? It's interesting that they don't harm environment as opposed to Turów. Maybe because they are owned by some Czech oligarch? ;)
@Arjunkumar99999 Жыл бұрын
Many people underestimate how close Khalistan came to being a country. Indira Gandhi’s strong policies kept it united with India but she lost her life for it.
@roelantverhoeven371 Жыл бұрын
antwerp is part of brabant (antwerp province), ghent is the capital of east-flanders. the whole of west-flanders would be part of that free state of antwerp, and they'd have hated it XD antwerp, ghent and bruges are rivals
@FragLord Жыл бұрын
Yes now they got ruled over by the French Bourgeoisie for over 100 years, weren't allowed to teach their language, were reduced to second rate citizens and used as cannon fodder during WW1. Yes so much better... The Flemish are the majority of Belgium today. At the start of Belgium that would have been close to 80%. Brussels a city that was between 60-90% Dutch speaking, only has 10% Dutch speakers left. This is what one of the co-founders of Belgium thought of the Dutch speaking citizens, In 1838, another co-founder, senator Alexandre Gendebien, even declared that the Flemish were "one of the more inferior races on the Earth, just like the negroes". Dutch wasn't an official language until after WW2. 1945 and it even didn't have a Dutch constitution until the 60's... I think if people could choose, which they didn't, they would have been happy to form a country. Funny how idiots try to pull on provincial divisions, when your own countrymen have tried to exterminate your language and culture. Maybe you should focus on that a tad more...
@_.simply.isaac._8 ай бұрын
10:39 I literally hear "Mosquito Language"
@to_cya_ Жыл бұрын
Idea for the next video- Countries That ALMOST didn’t existed
@edwardblair4096 Жыл бұрын
Belgium would count here, but it would be the same story as the one told in this video about the Free State of Antwerp.
@jimmyjames417 Жыл бұрын
Pontic Greeks!!! Lived there for thousands of years, got kicked out in 1920
@sv7gbi.744 Жыл бұрын
You missed Eastern Rumelia, which was annexed by Bulgaria. It was sovereign but not independent, populated mostly by Greeks and situated northern of Macedonia(the Greek), and West Thrace. It had coastline in the Black Sea, biggest port was Pyrgos (aka Burgas).
@General.Knowledge Жыл бұрын
Very interesting!
@sv7gbi.744 Жыл бұрын
Yeah makes the Balkan peninsula very complicated and interesting isn't it?
@EmperorOfDrill Жыл бұрын
@@sv7gbi.744 İN THRACE DESTORY GREEK ARMENİANS BULGARİANS NEW OTTOMAN TURKİSH STATES.
@shonenjumpmagneto Жыл бұрын
He didn't miss it, because it did in fact exist.
@sv7gbi.744 Жыл бұрын
@@shonenjumpmagneto Yeah, you are probably right...
@UtahForLife Жыл бұрын
Do you draw these things?
@TheAllMightyGodofCod Жыл бұрын
Just arrived yesterday from Schleswig-Holstein, had no idea they almost were a country.
@__Timmerman__ Жыл бұрын
Flanders could be a country as well in the future or join the netherlands
@brainwheeze6328 Жыл бұрын
Not sure if it counts, but what about the Portuguese proposal to unite their colonies in Angola and Mozambique?
@Got-lander Жыл бұрын
I didn’t realize that the letter H was silent in German too ;)
@nairolffootball Жыл бұрын
Ist es nur mitten im Wort. General Knowledge hat Schlewig Holstein falsch ausgesprochen
@yodorob Жыл бұрын
The Republic of Pontus could have been a "mainland Cyprus" in the sense of having a Greek majority well to the east of Greece itself (plus having a Turkish minority and having a conflict there between the Greeks and the Turks).
@ssskjold Жыл бұрын
For me personally the border between Denmark and Germany is one of the best in the world. Because it was the people who lived there who decided where the border should be. Some funny facts about the voting system in 1920 is that they were very different. In Nordschleswig/Sønderjylland people voted in one big block. Which meant that Sønderborg (Sonderburg), Aabenraa (Apenrade) and Tønder (Tondern), Tinglev and Højer all went to Denmark even though the majority voted for Germany in those cities. In Middle Schleswig people voted in small communities and if just one of them have had Danish majority, they would have gone to Denmark instead of Germany which almost happened with the Island Før. The people behind the voting, who primarily were Danish really wanted the city of Flensborg/Flensburg and considered to make it a part of the Nordschlewig voting area. But they were afraid that they could loose all of Nordschleswig to Germany if they did. The fact is that had Flensburg been part of the voting in Nordschleswig it would in fact have been Danish today. Because of the majority of Danish votes in the rest of the block. Actually all of Middleschleswig would have been Danish if it had been joined together with Nordschleswig in one big voting block.
@Frahamen Жыл бұрын
Don't tell Bart De Wever. He might get ideas.
@HuyNguyen-bn4oq Жыл бұрын
Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam)!!!
@LordDamianus Жыл бұрын
Although, I prefer our countries to be separate, I would love Zapadoslavia to exist for at least few years just to prove that Poland's bond with Czechia and Slovakia is something that is possible and that we truly consider ourselves as West Slavic family. I'm really tired of our history and politics being always centered around Eastern Europe among countries that aren't really culturally close to us (despite what many people believe). Yeah, I'm talking especially about Ukraine and Lithuania. While I admit that we share more history with Lithuanians and Ukrainians, I really can't consider them as our family. They're just culturally too different. Lithuania nowadays tries its best to be more Scandinavian, while Ukraine is even more different with its orthodox/greek catholic religion and Russian-like customs. In Czechia and Slovakia I feel more like at home and I consider Czechs and Slovaks as the closest people to us. Such a shame not many people realize how close we are.
@marekcmonster1937 Жыл бұрын
Hey, the Habsburg monarchist path for Poland can give you your polish-czechoslovak federation fix.
@hughjass5756 Жыл бұрын
The 2nd concept kinda makes sense but not sure if it would've worked right. Czech and Slovak unity imho would be enough
@NSMurley978 ай бұрын
Even though it never happened I love the sound of this Polish-Czechoslovak Federation. Just imagine if that were to happen today!
@plrc4593 Жыл бұрын
0:37 - Polish-Czechoslovak Commonwealth 😎
@free.nightingalemusic Жыл бұрын
5:20 United Bengal 💕💥
@leocremonezi Жыл бұрын
Que vídeo massa!!! Sou Timão, interior de São Paulo, mas viagem e futebol são paixões que transcendem qualquer coisa. Ótimo vídeo 🔥🔥
@Peterroegind Жыл бұрын
There was a change in from danish to German majority in South Schleswig from 1864-1920, due to Germanification and ethnic oppression.
@Sad.vocate Жыл бұрын
Alaska,Bavaria,Catalonia,Hong Kong, African Islamic republic,Antarctica,The Arab Mesopotamian republic(Persian confederation)Tibet,United republic of Ireland,United Arab republic of central Asia ,Arabian Islamic Union and the United federation of Korea• Thanks and see you next time on more general knowledge_
@eliejreije9578 Жыл бұрын
I would love to see a video about the points of president Wilson
@PreemL Жыл бұрын
In 1990s there was a proposed federation of Serbia and Greece
@mylomarquardt6395 Жыл бұрын
I live in Schleswig Holstein and never heard of that before! Ver interesting
@ahmetcelik2220 Жыл бұрын
i like to read greek and armenian comments... But i prefer misak-i milli 🇹🇷😉
@wankawanka3053 Жыл бұрын
I like to read about the earthquake in turkey
@yasonra Жыл бұрын
@@wankawanka3053 we will always beat you baby. get over it. you can just pray for an earthquake.