Very nice video lecture sir thank you so much uploaded video lecture sir
@poojaadvocate29582 жыл бұрын
Nice explain sir
@digvijaysinghgarg60253 жыл бұрын
Best 😇
@Rakesh-in8zk2 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir ji 😊
@mandeepkaurmahi0762 Жыл бұрын
Thnx sir❤❤
@deepG59253 жыл бұрын
Thnku sir
@payaljagdishlakhani25193 жыл бұрын
sir ap hai to hum bacho ka support bana rehta hai nito humare ly cpc kaha easy hai thank u so much sir dil se shukriya ki ap jese guru ji hume mile margdarshan ke ly...
@harpreetsinghkahlon28273 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@rinkysingh51622 жыл бұрын
Thanku so much for your effort
@devahlwt2 жыл бұрын
18:37 evasive denial , 20:09 specific denial :)
@AdityaMishra-kd6gr Жыл бұрын
🙏
@My_lyf993 жыл бұрын
Best lecture
@ekramahmed49203 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture sir
@My_lyf993 жыл бұрын
🙂🙂 thanku
@dikshataneja98593 жыл бұрын
Sir rule 1A ka third clause bilkul nhe samajh aaya plz clear kar dejeye
@archanagosavi33624 жыл бұрын
Very good lecture sir...👌👌
@namratabehera1624 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@ajitdubey66614 жыл бұрын
Fantastic work sir ,I hv cleared in one time what u hv taught,🙏
@200vaibhav12 жыл бұрын
sir, what is the meaning of counter reply to a written Statement.? where it is provided in C.P.C.? What is the effect of admission in written Statement by two or more defendants to the case.? what is the weight or effect of counter reply by remaining defendants, if it appears that two or more defendants Subsequently colluded with plaintiff's in making that admission & later entered into compromise with the plaintiff's? and later it is found that the Subject matter or a document regarding which admission was made, a) was not in existence b) it was not placed on record since beginning of suit.?
@MrARISH12344 жыл бұрын
Sir , Order 8 Rule 3 mai "EXCEPT DAMAGES" ka kya purpose hai ???
@200vaibhav14 жыл бұрын
sir, if a defendant does not wish to produce a document at stage of trial, but later takes recourse to order 1 rule 8a sub rule 4 & adopts this tactic subsequently can he be restraint from doing this? please answer
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
It's not about a person's wish, but the courts order, if he fails to produce intentionally then he can't be allowed at the latter stage
@AliJutt-py9ht3 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir ap ka contact nmb mil sktta
@meenachandigarh943 жыл бұрын
Hello.sir Hw r u sir Sir judiciary mains k liye judgement writing or framing of issues k liye koun c book refer kare?🙏 Thank u sir
@KhalidKhan-xr2qo4 жыл бұрын
Sir tnx ur lecture r dynamic tnx hope 2 listen u again
@divyanshbhargava15774 жыл бұрын
Sir order 8 R1 ke 1st proviso and 2nd proviso mein kya difference h except 90 days or 120 days
@200vaibhav15 жыл бұрын
sirji order 9 par thoda detail lecture banaiyega technical points are very much. it a request
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Sure
@PoojaGupta-nq3wj4 жыл бұрын
Thku sir 😊🙏🏻
@palakarora50474 жыл бұрын
thanks sir
@shreyagoyal36744 жыл бұрын
max limit of filing WS in commercial disputes is 120 days or it also applicable in civil dispute as well .. i mean civil dispute ke kie max limit 90 dayd hi ha na?
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
120 days only In commercial disputes
@shreyagoyal36744 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you sir 🙏for replying
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@geetanjalidas26734 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@sanjeevverma97894 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌👌👌
@Komalpreetkaurkk4 жыл бұрын
👍👍
@advashutoshshelar724 жыл бұрын
Sir agr writing kar ke samjaoge to aur ache se samjega plz write on display
@kapilkumarsingh82364 жыл бұрын
Sir Civil Case में प्रतिवाद-पत्र का उत्तर पुनः वादी द्वारा प्रस्तुत किया जाना सिविल कोर्ट में मान्य है या नही ?? इस वाक्य को सिद्ध करने के लिये माननीय सुप्रीम कोर्ट, नई दिल्ली या माननीय उच्च न्यायालय प्रयागराज, के निर्णय देने की प्रार्थना स्वीकार करें🙏
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
For every plaint there must be a written statement and against the written statement plaintiff might file replication and against replication defendant is not to respond the same
@kapilkumarsingh82364 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thanks Sir एक सिविल केस में वाद पत्र दाखिल करने के लगभग दो वर्ष के पश्चात प्रतिवादी ने प्रतिवाद पत्र कोर्ट में दाखिल किया केस में अगली डेट पर वादी के वकील ने प्रतिवाद पत्र के जवाब में replica (रैपलिका) दाखिल किया क्या वादी के वकील प्रतिवाद पत्र के बाद replica( रैपलिका ) जमा करने का C.P.C 1908 में कोई प्रावधान है C.P.C 1908 में कोई order, Rule replica( रैपलिका ) जमा करने के बारे में है क्या Sir🙏
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Replication can only be filled after written statement, if court has allowed written statement after 2 yrs than court has allow replication too. But it's a misuse of law.
@kapilkumarsingh82364 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thanks lot अब श्रीमान प्रतिवादी का वकील प्रतिवाद पत्र के बाद वादी के द्वारा replica( रैपलिका ) जमा करने पर आपत्ति कर रहे है कह रहे है कि replica ( रैपलिका ) का कोई प्रावधान ही नही है C.P.C 1908 में क्या C.P.C 1908 में replica( रैपलिका ) का कोई प्रावधान है ???🙏
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
The term replication does not find its place in CPC, however, through various judgements it is observed that in certain cases with the leave of the Court, Plaintiff has been permitted to file a rejoinder to the written statement filled by the defendant, such a rejoinder filled by the Plaintiff is termed as "replication". JUDGEMENTS Sunil and Vasanth Architects and Consulting Engineers and Anr Vs Tata Ceramics Ltd. (AIR 1999 Ker 88) Wherein it was held as follows: "Thus, the Plaintiff is allowed to file a replication, provided he gets leave of the Court. In this case the Court has granted leave. The application filed for leave shows that the replication was necessitated because certain incorrect statements were made in the written statement."
@THEROCKSSSSSS4 жыл бұрын
sir under order8 rule 1 maximum days allowed to file w.s is 90 or 120 days??
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
90
@THEROCKSSSSSS4 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 but 2015 amendment about commercial courts and according to bare acts mentions 120 days
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
@@THEROCKSSSSSS The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) in its judgment, in M/s SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 1638 Of 2019] held that the failure to file written statements within the statutory time period of 120 days for filing written statements in a commercial suit will result in the forfeiture of the right of the defendant to file a written statemen. This is only applicable to commercial suits but not to general written statement.
@THEROCKSSSSSS4 жыл бұрын
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thanks a lot sir🙏
@sachinmomaya70404 жыл бұрын
Sir Ji Kya Central Information Commission me CPC Order 8 rule 3,5 applicable kar sakate hai kya Written submissions jo applicant aur respondent ne kiye hai usame respondent ne sare point deny nahi kiye hai To kya written submissions respondent ka hai jisame usane kuch point deny nahi kiye the CIC me use High Court ko kahe sakate hai kya ki ye amount to admission hai
@Ruckia615 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@harpreetsinghkahlon28275 жыл бұрын
Welcome g
@iloveallah25444 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@advsukhisidhu13214 жыл бұрын
Thankx sir
@pritysingh79314 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir🙏🙏🙏
@advocatepankajriyar57564 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@sachinmomaya70404 жыл бұрын
Sir Ji Kya Central Information Commission me CPC Order 8 rule 3,5 applicable kar sakate hai kya Written submissions jo applicant aur respondent ne kiye hai usame respondent ne sare point deny nahi kiye hai To kya written submissions respondent ka hai jisame usane kuch point deny nahi kiye the CIC me use High Court ko kahe sakate hai kya ki ye amount to admission hai