Great part... and I love how exited you are at the end... stay like you are and thanks for sharing. Just my two cents... your New York videos still are awesome in so many ways... be proud of those humble beginnings and all those hurdles... awesome!
@DrunkenBobDole7 жыл бұрын
If you relieved the section behind the "hook" the part would probably have a much easier time fitting into place. You need too look at where your contact points are and what direction the force is being applied. There are enough contours to locate the part already, anything that isn't pushing towards the centre of the vice is over complicating things and getting in the way.
@tmoney18767 жыл бұрын
Tim Bolivar That's exactly what I was thinking. That back side isn't helping to position it or clamp it, so it can go away to keep from causing issues.
@brandonatallian21282 жыл бұрын
You rock man. So encouraging to your viewers. Cutting my first set of soft jaws this week and just trying to get a refresher on the process. Thanks for everything you do!
@wesco1237 жыл бұрын
Man! I enjoy your genuine enthusiasm and appreciate your authentic, real life persona. Thumbs up!
@jayjohnson1107 жыл бұрын
John you have mentioned tramming the Tormach several times but have not shown your method. Thanks for all you do.
@chefhearne7 жыл бұрын
I could swear, on a fairly recent episode, he did tram it and talked about it. I can't remember which one it would be either and I could be wrong, maybe John will pop in and comment.
@mrcpelayo7 жыл бұрын
its really great that you're showing others how to take full advantage of the full CAD/CAM package that Fusion comes with. I use it at work, and absolutely love it. That being said, bro you can do these much quicker without any special fixturing. Depending on the production run, you can just order a large billet, array multiple of the same parts in the billet. Face the billet, using double sticky tape, flip over and finish the other side. Like in many cases, there's always more than one way to skin a cat. It would save setup time, and part loading. When I get parts from a customer that has a flat face on one side with maybe a chamfer on one side, we call those one OP parts, just pre-face the first side, then it gets flipped over and the rest of the part is machined. Hot glue and rubber cement is used to fill areas from the first Op to avoid the coolant from eating the tape adhesive. Just thought I would give my 2 cents, love the fusion webinars you do!
@andrewgiles61927 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing the full process John, including stock cutting, part flipping etc, it really helps get a well rounded view of the whole process, not just the impressive bits. I don't think I can buy plain aluminium of that size for $12 (well even for £12 which is the currency here), let alone well machined soft jaw blanks! Maybe you could do a chip break on metal suppliers, how you find out reasonable prices, volume discounts etc - you;ve done the full novice to pro thing, and metal supply plays a part in that journey. Thanks
@feltonissimo7 жыл бұрын
You can easily get ali tha price. You will be surprised. Take a look at www.aluminiumwarehouse.co.uk/ and they are probably on the pricey side. The only thing is that you have to buy in a certain quantity. But hey, if you want to make a set of ali jaws why not make a couple of dozen and put them on the shelf. Or even better, sells some!
@dopihead7 жыл бұрын
Some food for thought 1: You should technically be able to drop in your part onto the soft jaws without having to unclamp them. 2: next time program in a drill and blow out all your sharp inside corners before milling out your feature. Makes life soooo much easier!! AND 3: For future jaws watch out for end mills with those small pesky corner radius's! You'll be chasing your tail for hours trying to figure out why your part came out tapered. Lets just say sharp corners (even if chamfered ) don't sit well in pockets with rounded edges lol Idk just stuff ive learned these past few years. Anyways keep it up man!! Love your videos:D
@azenginerd94987 жыл бұрын
As Peter Meek mentioned you could eliminate all the fixed jaw profile geometry that isn't providing clamping force. I couldn't tell from the video if you have this in place, but on a part like this I like to run the depth of the first operation profile about 0.010 beyond the part. Then in the second operation when you face off you are not right at the floor of your "mushroom cap". You can also bypass the second op rough profiling and accomplish it with the face mill. Since you are cutting way past the mushroom cap floor the facing just turns the cap into chips. I concur completely with your take on the total cost of soft jaws: With CAM they are quick to cut and the material is cheap. If you have idle people on the clock then it is cost effective to run a batch of soft jaw blanks. If you are running jobs it is WAY more cost effective to buy a 10-pack. I ran many jobs at quantities of 10 or less and soft jaws were used. Often, with a little forethought, you can design jaws with more than one purpose. A few things I like to do with soft jaws: They start to multiply and keeping them straight becomes problematic. In CAM, add an engraving of the part number to both jaws (Sharpie goes away). Also, engrave arrows or other pointers to the intended origin. This does nothing for you today... but six months from now when you need to run a second batch! Part number you say? Good file management requires unique names. Assign a unique part number to your files as you create them. Naming part files BRACKET and FIXTURE will get messy really fast. Keep your great content coming!
@SwitchAndLever7 жыл бұрын
Dude, that's great! Love that your joy shines through your work like that too! One question though, what is that case/frame you're using for the GoPro? Looks like it has a custom lens on it, no?
@skeeterweazel7 жыл бұрын
John, newb CNC question: it seems you always try to climb mill. At 12:00 minute mark in this vid where you're staring to mill the soft jaws you are climbing only. I read that climbing gives the best chip load/finish. But wouldn't it be faster when roughing something out to go back-n-forth, such as in this case where you're making a pocket on the soft jaw? Is it that much tougher on the cutter cutting conventionally? Thx. Marty
@JackS4254 жыл бұрын
where I work we cut the soft jaws large, so instead of being thin like hard jaws they have more area in they Y direction. That way you can keep sinking your part into the surface as you move from job to job. The set i currently use has had 6 different jobs in it.
@thetruthyouneedtohear5 жыл бұрын
Reviewing your video's today after making soft jaws last night, and it was funny when you go, it's always at the end when you ruin the part. So true. Great video.
@thomaswayne97137 жыл бұрын
Two points, at 2:30 in: 1) "Mushroom cap" = "webb" to many manufacturers; and 2) A [roughly] 56% increase in blank size will yield two NESTED parts, resulting in a bit of savings in material costs and DOUBLE your output per cycle, meaning more peripheral work can be accomplished between part changes.
@2012rcampion6 жыл бұрын
Hi John, I was recently playing around with the CAM for a similar sort of setup and found a neat way to handle rest machining when flipping the part. After running the simulation for the first op, save the stock as a solid model (right click, Stock > Save Stock...). Then, in the CAD workspace import that solid model (Insert > Insert Mesh). (You might need the Mesh Workspace preview enabled, not sure.) Lastly, for the second op choose Stock > From Solid and pick the solid you just imported. If you're doing a more complex part with steps on the top and bottom it can be really helpful for keeping track of what you still need to mill. The downside of this method is that if you change the CAM for the first op, you have to repeat the process.
@ChicagoRacerJoe6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for information on using the fixed soft jaw for your coordination! Never thought of that before.
@EdgePrecision7 жыл бұрын
John, One thing you might consider. When you mill soft jaws in this way it would be more precise to line up on the part instead of the soft jaw corner. In the case of this part you could of drill the hole all the way thru (I noticed when you actually milled the part in the video the hole was thru. Did you do this?) and indicate that as your second operations zero. This is because in order to fit the part in the jaws you have to have clearance so when you tighten the vice the part shifts back some amount. Also don't necessary think in terms of needing the part square in the jaws. It might be that rotating the part one way or the other would give a better clamping situation and use the volume of the jaws better. This way of thought goes back to manual machining but isn't necessary with CNC.
@DarronBlack7 жыл бұрын
I've got your power drawbar attachment. Works great! ... my large knee mill has a very long drawbar, so I had to put 3" blocks under it to get the height right, but with a bit of a stretch to reach the handle it does well.
@PeterWMeek7 жыл бұрын
Any thoughts on relieving all soft jaw faces that don't clamp? On the fixed jaw there seems (to me) to be no reason to touch the part on faces that don't contribute to Y-axis pressure or X-axis location.
@mfuzita7 жыл бұрын
Great job! some day I'll have a CNC and time to study all your videos! congratulations from Brazil.
@Regalmetalworks7 жыл бұрын
I just bought the edge technologies tramming gauge because my passes with the superfly cut on the backside....I see your 1100 is cutting on the backside as well....looks less than mine...i was wondering if tramming would fix that, guess it will get it closer..
@DanBader6 жыл бұрын
So is there a general practice to over/under sizing the negative in the soft jaw operations to ensure the part fits into the soft jaws for second side ops? I would think if my CNC can actually hold very tight tolerances I might have a problem getting the part to slide down into the negative in the soft jaws. But obviously I'm worried that applying a uniform -0.0005 axial stock to leave on the final contour will mean I'm guessing as to where the part is actually located once clamped in.
@Motorman02977 жыл бұрын
You can buy long aluminum rectangle bars and just make your own soft jaws. Thats what we do at our shop. Buying them pre-made is wayyyyy too expensive! We made a few hundred several years ago and haven't ran out yet. You should look into making your own John.
@VPEEK7 жыл бұрын
We always used Acetal for soft jaws, super quick and easy to make then when you can rip through the material at high speed.
@asArsenic6 жыл бұрын
Interestingly enough we use mild steel. Then again compared to the stuff we typically cut that is actually soft.
@Stephen14557 жыл бұрын
That is so true! Have been Tool and Diemaker, Gagemaker, Instrumentmaker, all have different talents.But so few of these details you show will be taught!
@50STUNT7 жыл бұрын
sweet video! 16:30 is why I didnt purchase fusion. no compare on the simulation so that left over material isn't seen. Camworks shows it. I don't know how you run with no compare on the simulation.
@tannermadeen17693 жыл бұрын
I would recommend putting a small radius like .005 where your tool leaves the jaws to remove the sharp corners to make safer for the operator and avoid having to hand debur. Also would cut soft jaw profile over at least .001 per side to ensure part falls in freely. Help from having to hold op 1 profile to such a high tolerance and keep jaws from being deformed from forcing oversized parts in them. But if only for a one off then it will work just fine. In general if your location of features on op 1 doesn't have to be to the tenths to features to op 2 then fixture can have some slop especially if the profile geometry of the part is more complicated. Its much easier to make a fixture slightly bigger than to recut an oversized part cut from rough stock or having to scrap the part entirely bc it will not fit in next ops fixture. All in all great job.
@77gravity7 жыл бұрын
Excellent, I have recently bought a manual mill (CNC isn't in my budget quite yet) but I learn so much from these videos anyway. Thank you. Question: What would then be the run time to make the next handle? (now that the soft-jaws are done, etc).
@cooleffenguy7 жыл бұрын
when we machine soft jaws we make sure the part fits in there without having to unloosening the vise. the part should be able to drop right in snuggly and if it doesn't we make an adjustment. figure out the gap you need prior to machining.
@ajazahmad65517 жыл бұрын
yg
@HughesEarthworks7 жыл бұрын
Another great video John. I want to see if I can replicate this and get the same quality results on my 440.
@ipadize7 жыл бұрын
17:48 this is a perfect example for in-machine compensation (RL and RR) so you dont need to change the program and repost, just say DR -0.001 and the machine will compensate the radius -0.001 :)
@matthewgowan75467 жыл бұрын
I found the heidenhain guy :D
@ipadize7 жыл бұрын
Matthew Gowan Heidenhain is best :)
@matthewgowan75467 жыл бұрын
Have to pretend to blend in though, you mean G41, G42, and radius wear offset :P
@ipadize7 жыл бұрын
i think so, i dont know Gcode much but Heidenhain Klartext (L Z+100 F9999, L X-30 Y +43, L Z +5 M99 - or RL for compensating the cutter on the left side of the Coordinate for example)
@DanRudolph7 жыл бұрын
Looks like John has coordinate system rotation turned on on the VM3... G68!
@mistryrajan59994 жыл бұрын
Hey man , I curious about what you doing.. I want to ask a question. Can u show us how to design a fixture that u been use to hold this part there. ??
@cylosgarage7 жыл бұрын
Great video. How'd you like TOT's tribute to you in his 100k special?
@DanBader6 жыл бұрын
Link?
@AdamBath7 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed watching this one.
@powder-phun9497 жыл бұрын
I need some help. I know very little about CNC machining, but I need a CNC mill. Do you have any suggestions on some not very expensive machine? It's going to mainly be used for making molds for low pressure molding from aluminum (about one per month).
@timwatterson80607 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you use the fly cutter to finish the valley so the finish looked nice(and time)?
@Hardturnin7 жыл бұрын
Very nice work. With these shapes the shapes and radius given needs some clearance. I was wondering if you would use dukes and lo and behold you did. It can show us where the bind is. Most all the time with softjaws I leave the vise clamped and then try it out. Often it is only a adjustment on cutter comp. my something different suggestions would be dykem part first then still being clamped try the fit and adjust to fit. Also in general and you likely do this is to machine on one end of the jaws a nice step in case you need to use them in the future. Darn nice work for a young man who has come so far in such a short period of time. If young men like you are the future I will sleep well at night. Carry on!
@northernsmith7 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a video on smoothing. My mill gets jerky at feed rates over 25 ipm.
@dudemcgee2566 жыл бұрын
That sounds more like a data starving problem. Turn up your baud rate.
@zangarkhan7 жыл бұрын
Do u have a video on tramming ?
@JOHNPHUFNAGEL7 жыл бұрын
That was awesome John
@tomschweinert71657 жыл бұрын
Hey John can you do a tutorial on how you creatr the soft jaws in cam. I am new to the cam part of machining and not sure how it is done
@ALWAYSPDG7 жыл бұрын
Informative video John, nice work!
@jackflash63777 жыл бұрын
When creating soft jaws from a part. Do you use something like Negative stock to leave? I can't imagine machining something to the exact size of the part you want to drop down in the soft jaw cavity. That bit me on a part when I first tried to use soft jaws. Ruined $150 worth of stock. Never went back to it so I'm still up in the air about that.
@supernewf37225 жыл бұрын
According to AVE the butterfly impact wrench for the bridgeport are not that great.Holes aren't lined up,screws are miss matched.Hopefully you saw the video and learned something from it.Let us know if you improved or made any changes to the product.Cheers!!!
@Stephen14557 жыл бұрын
Hey John, does your camera have a protective lens, haven't seen you be that close before, love your work, I am all manual, but really appreciate your cnc!
@jodyolivent84817 жыл бұрын
Awesome video and great job! I would love to see a video detailing "smoothing". When to use it and when not to. As I get my Kitamura setup I have a feeling I will need that since she is only slightly younger than I and both of us suffer from a short memory. :o
@AlMg1SiCu7 жыл бұрын
I've got a 1992 HAAS VF-1 with a grand 100k of memory. Gotta pull some fancy tricks to get it to perform how I want it to- Smoothing reduced a file from 400k to 120k last night, and the moves weren't made up of tiny short sections anymore, so it could actually keep up instead of jerking around waiting on the CPU. I also found an M-code that disables the display while the program runs and frees up even more resources, so I can run 150ipm trochoidial HSM toolpaths in a machine that was originally only fit for 2.5d slow steel parts. Good luck with your Kitamura!
@jodyolivent84817 жыл бұрын
Nick Polanosky Thanks, that's good to know. I'll definitely dig into this more.
@jbbauer07 жыл бұрын
Yeah I would like to see a video on smoothing too. I have used it often lately.
@mr1hander7 жыл бұрын
hello john... ijust switched to fusion from inventor... if you get time would it be possible to do a vid on how you made the pattern in the softjaws,,,, in inventor i used the derive feature,,, but i cant find that in fusion..
@OriginalJetForMe7 жыл бұрын
This is great, thank you. I have a client who wants me to make a sword hilt, a 3D part. I'm pretty sure soft jaws are the answer, but I'm not at all sure how to make sure they can hold the part when it's flipped; there won't be a flat bottom, and there might be some sharp ridges that won't fit well into the cavity, because the inverse of the ridge will be too shallow due to the tool radius (does that make sense?). I don't know if Fusion can 3D dog bone a sharp inside corner/ridge.
@shamu38387 жыл бұрын
Maybe you already know this, but based on your feed rates, it seems you may not be familiar with what radial chip thinning is. You have this awesome software tool, (adaptive tool paths), but you are using feed rates for old school tool paths.
@77gravity7 жыл бұрын
So should his feed rates be higher or lower?
@dudemcgee2566 жыл бұрын
Much higher. We use micro tooling and regularly feed 1/8" flat end mills at full flute depth (.1875") at 50 ipm. You actually get a much better finish and your tools will last much longer.
@sitoru7 жыл бұрын
what if you used wood for the soft jaws? would they not hold as good?
@MTknives3 жыл бұрын
Great video, Love it!
@pprotory7 жыл бұрын
Did you cover the soft jaw creation for this or any other odd object for that matter in fusion 360? I feel like you did and I saw the video but when I searched all I could find was the one for solidworks from 2014.
@pprotory7 жыл бұрын
I found it lol. It was the last vid I would have thought it was. The vid you did on plastics is where you methodically covered the soft jaw creation. As always thanks again!
@ElYnzekto7 жыл бұрын
Hi John, what if you try it with holding tabs?
@upgradeworld65115 жыл бұрын
Can I know do you using fanuc control CNC machine?
@AhmedMohamed-yj3kt3 жыл бұрын
What is the clearence should be used in soft jaws
@adamantprize127 жыл бұрын
Ever thought of live streaming CNC-machining or just manual machining - metalworks on twitch? i would watch it
@robertkutz7 жыл бұрын
john nice work.
@bradleynealdaley7 жыл бұрын
No need to have the whole OD clamped, especially what is on the back side. Not sure if fusion has a draft angle viewer like SW has for mould making, but set up a plane parallel to your jaws in SW, and do a draft angle detection. Keep all surfaces with a draft of more than 1° positive at nominal relief, and all values less than +1° draft, relief by .005" That will let the part drop in easily, and since all of the + draft faces are where they are supposed to be, you don't have any issues with clamping. If you are worried about vibration of the part on the back side, then ramp into that .005 backside relief.
@lwilton7 жыл бұрын
I wonder if it would have been worth using the superfly to clean up as much as possible of that lower surface to get a better surface finish. Obviously you couldn't have done the whole surface, but you might have ended up with a lot less tool marks.
@dmitribovski12927 жыл бұрын
Would have been a lot quicker as well.
@alexanderrode69837 жыл бұрын
Great work!
@repalmore7 жыл бұрын
Have you ever tried hot glue to stick a part down. I'm sure that it wouldn't work for steel but do wonder if it would work for for aluminum. Very flat surface to glue to and go ahead and top it into place with a mallet when you first put it on the surface and the glue is still soft. Probably wouldn't be good for something like this because location is so important but something that just needs the backside fly cut it might be worth trying.
@AlMg1SiCu7 жыл бұрын
I have done this before on some large, flat parts. Heated a 3/4"x12x12" piece of aluminum on a hotplate, applied hotglue, stuck down a sheet of steel. Grabbed some gloves and chucked it all in the freezer for a few minutes (Would have taken an hour to cool all of that thermal mass at ambient temp). Straight out of the freezer, into the mill, and then perfect parts came out the other side. Worked better than the superglue/carpet tape/etc. Not as convenient as a vacuum plate and cleanup was a bitch, but it got the job done.
@repalmore7 жыл бұрын
Believe or not just a little rubbing alcohol is all that is needed to clean up the hot glue. Don't understand why but it just releases hot glue like it was made to do just that. lifehacker.com/5676237/use-rubbing-alcohol-to-remove-hot-glue-from-nearly-anything
@AlMg1SiCu7 жыл бұрын
With that much surface area it is still a PITA. For one or two parts it works. For more than that, finding a different way is wise.
@Sicktrickintuner7 жыл бұрын
I wish an end mill was only $8, The cold Canadian north is a bit more expensive. A good drill bit alone in 5/8" costs me $30
@stormbringermornblade88117 жыл бұрын
that was good john i have a lot of caching up to do lol :)
@dougstansbury29167 жыл бұрын
where are the transcripts located for download?
@dougstansbury29167 жыл бұрын
Lou Kola read it, got it. Thanks
@asArsenic6 жыл бұрын
The shop I work in pretty much exclusively uses soft jaws on second operations.
@cncit7 жыл бұрын
If you put your x y zero in fusion on the centre of the part for side 1 you wouldn't have to edge find it as you already know the coordinates of the vice on the machine..bit quicker is all :-)
@gwanwangdang49427 жыл бұрын
我来自中国,我也是一名CNC编程!虽然不懂英语,但我学到一些加工方法!非常感谢您!师傅
@erlinghagendesign7 жыл бұрын
你现在在哪里? Herri
@gwanwangdang49427 жыл бұрын
SURE D 東莞
@DenKonZenith7 жыл бұрын
For the maker-ing I do, with FDM printing, that'd be a dirt simple part 'cause it's got one completely flat side, with zero overhang. Granted, plastic's not QUITE as nice as aluminium, but budgets...
@heronguarezi65017 жыл бұрын
A little tighter and you do not need to close the vise. kk
@Bigwingrider18007 жыл бұрын
HOLLY SHIT BIG JOHN, I POP IN AND IT LOOKS LIKE YOU GET WORST...LOL
@feltonissimo7 жыл бұрын
You would need to redesign the jaws for a production run. Some basic fixturing errors in your jaw design.
@sn0wchyld7 жыл бұрын
care to elaborate? ive got some complex parts coming up, would be interested to know a better way
@OriginalJetForMe7 жыл бұрын
feltonissimo yes, please elaborate. I'd like to know, too.
@feltonissimo7 жыл бұрын
I will try to explain but I'm not very good at explaining things. That's what John is so good at. Notice how John had trouble fitting the part into the jaws. He ended having to shave a bit off here and there and eventually got a very snug fit. Well on a production job you can't afford the time to do that. You will also get variation of parts (even with a CNC machine you are going to get this). So it won't be long down the batch before he will find a component not going onto the fixture. The reason behind this is that the jaws have been designed with redundant clamping faces, where the form of the jaws goes back on itself (told you I wasn't much good at explaining things). This is also why John had to drop the component into the jaws. The best way to avoid the problem is to design the jaw profile into a shape that avoids this problem. Imagine the shape you would get if you put a rubber band around the outside of the component. Sometimes it's necessary to change the angle of orientation of the component to get a good clamping profile. Not sure if that all made sense. P.S. I wouldn't have worried about milling off the 'mushroom' profile either. Just whack it off with a good old face mill :)
@OriginalJetForMe7 жыл бұрын
feltonissimo I think that was a fine explanation, thank you. Trivia: the "rubber band" you mention is known as a "convex hull," and is an important concept in computational geometry.
@feltonissimo7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rick. I like that term, 'convex hull'. My mission now is to drop it into a conversation :)
@hugosarmiento91267 жыл бұрын
¿te agradaría subtitulado en español?
@flippah91017 жыл бұрын
ahhhh taco tapas sombrero?
@SteZane7 жыл бұрын
You have my dream job 😫
@zomie17 жыл бұрын
Smoothing would be a great topic :)
@ello-mz6om7 жыл бұрын
can't you just use a piece of stock as soft jaw?
@nobrick3217 жыл бұрын
WW134 is the best world war
@tsw1997567 жыл бұрын
To me soft jaws with such an exact fit on. soooo much geometry on a one off part is a waste of time and money. I would use a 2nd piece of the stock or a piece of scrap laying around for a base fixture using some creative and simple clamping and have the job done and out the door while your fiddling with fitment of the soft jaws.
@alejandroperez53685 жыл бұрын
3D printing it would've been the appropiate approach
@gredangeo7 жыл бұрын
5:43 ...Just get rid of this shhhhit. Oh, that's not what you were saying? ok. ;D