Necessity can't exonerate a person who has committed a grave criminal offence on the basis of such aforesaid necessity. It has rare success in such cases, but can govern a beneficial turnout in trivial cases. As always each case has its individual characteristics and case law is ever evolving. I say we wait and see. It boils down to moral reasoning ...consequentialist and categorical - to locate morality in varies settings.
@abchannel90054 жыл бұрын
excellent
@xKILLERSTALKERx3 жыл бұрын
love your work
@sophiemarie42418 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, thanks :)
@appletree84415 жыл бұрын
This all also depends upon who is in need. Being rich and or famous goes a long ways to making more thing and great thing being Needed to survive... or others survive.
@appletree84415 жыл бұрын
Speeding to get somebody to hospital who most likely would have died is a hit and miss.. depending upon how it was seen by the officer. If pregnant..you can sorta break some traffic laws. But if somebody is gut shot and you are to far from medical help that death is certain.toy can take somebodys carcabdcsowedcabd Ren lights....etc. But..if you are close enough to help..fire department..police ambulance etc. You most likely will oayvacorice if you do the same thing for the sane reason. That's why we have judges
@appletree84415 жыл бұрын
I was lost in the mountains in BC and I needed to break into a cabin in order to survive. I was found three days later sleeping.. who been sleeping in my bed? I paid for the window glass and food that I ate..but beside having a talk with the RCMP..nothing came of it. Since you was going to die if I didn't break the laws.