CRINGE BLOWS A KISS AFTER TALKING MUMBO JAMBO! ALI DAWAH| SPEAKERS CORNER

Рет қаралды 2,415

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 26

@classicchrome716 7 күн бұрын

SubhanAllah ! La Ilahe Illa Allah ! Allahu Akbar ! Elhamdulillah ! I am from Germany. SubhanAllah ! La Ilahe Illa Allah ! Allahu Akbar ! Elhamdulillah ! May Allah s w t bless our beloved Sheikhs / Brothers and their Familes and everyone who is involved in the Dawah ! Amin ! May Allah bless you. Amin !

@suleimanaliyu3308 7 күн бұрын

Ali Dawah just dismantled this arrogant atheist beyond recognition

@urwhack 8 күн бұрын

Isaac Newton (1643-1727) "In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God’s existence."

@DevilFruitJourney 7 күн бұрын

Newton copied a lot of his work of muslims. Alhamdullilah.

@ericappiah5240 6 күн бұрын

No, Newton was Entomologist

@urwhack 6 күн бұрын

@@ericappiah5240 lmao no.. Newton held a form of Christianity that is now considered Nontrinitarian Arian. He was monotheistic.

@DevilFruitJourney 7 күн бұрын

Please like this comment so everyone can understand the point our brother makes here: Your argument clearly demonstrates that the universe, in its existence and functioning, is dependent on the components that constitute it, as well as the laws that govern their interactions. Here's a more detailed breakdown: 1. Dependency on Components - The universe consists of space, time, matter, energy, and forces (such as gravity and electromagnetism). These elements are not independent but interact and influence each other. - Without the specific configuration and combination of these elements, the universe would not be what it is. For example, the stability of galaxies depends on gravity, which in turn depends on the mass and distribution of matter. 2. Space-Time and Physical Laws - Space and time do not exist independently of matter and energy. According to the theory of general relativity, space-time is curved by mass and energy. This demonstrates that space-time and matter/energy are interdependent. - Similarly, physical laws only function within the framework provided by the universe. These laws are tightly linked to the properties of the components (e.g., particles, fields). 3. Dynamics and Dependency - The universe as a whole is a dynamic system. Its evolution (e.g., expansion, structure formation) depends on its initial conditions and the composition of its components. - Without the existence of specific forces or particles, the behavior of the universe would be fundamentally different. Thus, the universe is dependent on these elements. 4. Conclusion Yes, the universe is dependent on the existence and configuration of its internal components, as well as the forces and laws that bind them together. Space-time, physical laws, and the universe's structures only function as a whole. There is no evidence suggesting that any of these elements could exist entirely independently. Therefore, the universe, in its entirety and functionality, is inherently dependent on its parts and their interactions. - ChatGPT

@DevilFruitJourney 7 күн бұрын

Further: Your example clearly illustrates the problem of **infinite regression**, a concept often used in philosophy to argue against the possibility of an infinite chain of causes. Let’s analyze this in detail: --- ### **1. Infinite Regression: Your Example** - If each person in the chain must ask the person behind them for permission before you can drink, and the chain is infinite, no one will ever make a decision. - This demonstrates that an infinite chain of dependencies cannot lead to any action (such as drinking), because there is no starting point. There must be someone who is **not dependent on others** and can independently make the decision. --- ### **2. The Necessity of a "Starting Point"** - To break the chain, there must be an **independent initiator**, someone or something that is not dependent on anything else. - In philosophical terms, this is referred to as a **necessary or independent existence**-something that was not caused by anything else but exists on its own. - This "starting point" is essential for the universe to have begun and not be stuck in an infinite regression. --- ### **3. Who or What is this "Starting Point"?** Your argument points to a concept that is central to many philosophical and religious frameworks: #### **All-Knowing and All-Powerful** - The "starting point" must be someone or something that is independent, exists outside the chain, and has the power to begin the universe. - This description aligns with the concept of a **transcendent being**, often referred to as God: - **Transcendent:** Exists outside of space, time, and the dependencies of the universe. - **All-Powerful:** Has the ability to establish the laws of the universe and bring everything into existence. - **All-Knowing:** Possesses the wisdom and knowledge to create a functioning universe. #### **Philosophical Perspectives** - Aristotle referred to this as the **unmoved mover**: a first cause that itself is not moved but initiates everything else. - Thomas Aquinas spoke of a **necessary being**, the cause of all other contingent things. --- ### **4. Alternatives Without an "All-Knowing Starting Point"** Some modern theories attempt to avoid the need for a transcendent being: - **Cyclic Universes:** The universe might exist in an eternal cycle of creation and destruction. However, even here, the question remains: Who or what initiated the cycle? - **Quantum Fluctuations:** Some scientists propose that the universe emerged from a quantum fluctuation. Yet this raises another question: Why do quantum fluctuations exist in the first place? --- ### **5. Conclusion** Your example convincingly demonstrates that an infinite chain of dependent events is not possible, as it would prevent any final decision or cause. Therefore, there must be a **starting point** that is independent of the chain. The qualities of this "starting point"-independence, omnipotence, and omniscience-strongly resemble the concept of God.