Critical Thinking #4: Normative & Descriptive Claims

  Рет қаралды 39,898

David Pakman Show

David Pakman Show

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 41
@123sheag
@123sheag 6 жыл бұрын
this needs to be taught around grade 6 i think or so to everyone, thanks for doing these they are awesome
@thunderpooch
@thunderpooch 6 жыл бұрын
Wearing green in front of a green screen is wise if you are doing a skit and want to appear like a clueless bell end.
@123sheag
@123sheag 6 жыл бұрын
wearing green when hiding in the bushes good idea
@ihartevil
@ihartevil 6 жыл бұрын
it already is its called what was taught in second grade by 6th grade you have to use all of this in order to do algebra by the time you are in 7th grade all of this is used in physics and if you cant pass the standardize test that has physics in it the teachers just mark you off as a failure and dont even try with you for the most part if they do its just to make you pass the standardize test so their pay rate doesnt go down most 8th graders know calculus and you cant do calculus unless you know all of these basic things
@lindafitzpatrick5359
@lindafitzpatrick5359 3 жыл бұрын
@@123sheag 00tod
@123sheag
@123sheag 3 жыл бұрын
@@lindafitzpatrick5359 true
@gillianandrews8194
@gillianandrews8194 6 жыл бұрын
This is a great starting point for teaching children. As a 6th grade teacher, I will begin with this one. Most excellent series, thank you!
@candymaerollon1681
@candymaerollon1681 3 жыл бұрын
You discussed it very well. Thank you
@sytheprice407
@sytheprice407 3 жыл бұрын
A motto I like to live by..."Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
@nixthelatter
@nixthelatter 4 жыл бұрын
This is great David. Ive been a fan for about 6 months now and never saw these until now but I'm hooked! Do you still make miniseries like this? You do a great job at it and I would love to see more like it!
@yannygatto
@yannygatto 6 жыл бұрын
I would argue that "Michael often doesn't stop at stop signs" is normative in its use of "often" which doesn't have an objective value to it. A more descriptive manner of wording this would potentially be "There are times when Michael doesn't stop at stop signs". But I'm splitting hairs somewhat. Great series!
@dnmclnnn
@dnmclnnn 4 жыл бұрын
'Often' may be vague but vagueness and normativity are not equivalent.
@dot49190
@dot49190 2 жыл бұрын
Remember to stop the video a minute before the end unless you want to hear the ads
@jamiecqwong
@jamiecqwong 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video! This definitely helps!! :)
@tanyapadma
@tanyapadma 4 жыл бұрын
Is it ok with you if I use this video in my online ethics course?
@SJNaka101
@SJNaka101 5 жыл бұрын
"Michael often doesn't stop at stop signs" isn't exactly a descriptive claim. "Often" is a vague term, and could be left up to the interpretation of whoever hears it. For someone who always stops at stop signs, "often" might mean what others might call "every once in a while". Just saying, if you're gonna make examples about concrete descriptive claims you should probably use concretely descriptive words :P Love the video! A lot of this seems pretty intuitive to me (normative claim), but I've never taken a class and actually learned the vocabulary (descriptive claim). Really appreciate this series!
@dnmclnnn
@dnmclnnn 4 жыл бұрын
"Michael often doesn't stop at stop signs" is in fact a perfectly descriptive claim. The word 'often' is not important because the difference between normative and descriptive is not a matter of concreteness or certainty. "A lot of this seems pretty intuitive to me" is actually also a descriptive claim. Ironic.
@tanabhensley
@tanabhensley Жыл бұрын
Normative claim is just an opinion
@anishpritam1800
@anishpritam1800 2 жыл бұрын
Who came here after Anushree mam give suggestion.......
@voLumez
@voLumez 4 жыл бұрын
So many ads... Half of the "videos" are a pitch for Brilliant subscribers...
@TheCountOfMommysCrisco
@TheCountOfMommysCrisco 6 жыл бұрын
Damn normy claims always runnin' around with opinions an' shit. They'll never be dank claims like that.
@luguy8347
@luguy8347 6 жыл бұрын
Descriptive is male, Normative is female, it’s been claimed. Really been waiting forever for Pakman’s critical thinking series.
@ultearmilkojohn1145
@ultearmilkojohn1145 4 жыл бұрын
tf?
@Potencyfunction
@Potencyfunction Жыл бұрын
Let me ask one "6 grade" question. To which type of gramatical parts you assign gen* aka feminin. masculin or neutral?
@FilterExel
@FilterExel 6 жыл бұрын
My pants are warm... My pants... are warm.
@thunderpooch
@thunderpooch 6 жыл бұрын
actors studio?
@kevincollins7320
@kevincollins7320 6 жыл бұрын
intelligence anlisy
@johnsweda2999
@johnsweda2999 6 жыл бұрын
Really that's a bad example the green screen you don't know that Sarah is wearing a green shirt? even if it looks green to you! It doesn't mean it's green. she could be standing next to a green light it could be a white shirt? Like I saw the driver of the car he had a blue car not the case necessarily?
@Geotan00
@Geotan00 6 жыл бұрын
The point was that he knows for a fact it is green, as seen by his descriptive claim, but that she should change clothes before standing in front of a green screen (his opinion, aka normative claim).
@johnsweda2999
@johnsweda2999 6 жыл бұрын
Geotan you don't know for certain if she had Green Close because she was standing in front of a green screen, there are other factors that can play a part in the same aspect as wearing a green top it doesn't have to be green to work with a green screen? If she was wearing sequins for example
@Geotan00
@Geotan00 6 жыл бұрын
You do know that she was wearing a green shirt. The green shirt claim (2:04) is made before the green screen claim (2:28). At 2:53 he specifically addresses that he KNOWS Sarah is wearing a green shirt, implying he thinks so beyond a reasonable doubt, and this is BEFORE she is standing in front of a green screen.
@CourtneyHaynes
@CourtneyHaynes 6 жыл бұрын
A descriptive claim can be false or true. So even if the shirt is pink, it is a descriptive claim.
@thunderpooch
@thunderpooch 6 жыл бұрын
It is wise to wear green in front of a green screen if one is doing a performance art piece on.
Critical Thinking #5: Necessary & Sufficient Conditions
5:33
David Pakman Show
Рет қаралды 39 М.
19 Common Fallacies, Explained.
8:01
Jared Henderson
Рет қаралды 580 М.
MY HEIGHT vs MrBEAST CREW 🙈📏
00:22
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 106 МЛН
小丑揭穿坏人的阴谋 #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:35
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
龟兔赛跑:好可爱的小乌龟#short #angel #clown
01:00
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 118 МЛН
Trump interviewed by religious lunatic, COMPLETELY FLOPS
12:15
David Pakman Show
Рет қаралды 647 М.
Critical Thinking #9: Ad Hominem Fallacy
8:54
David Pakman Show
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Critical Thinking #11: Appeal to the People Fallacy
3:27
David Pakman Show
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Is Logic Normative?
42:00
Kane B
Рет қаралды 54 М.
Peter Singer - ordinary people are evil
33:51
Jeffrey Kaplan
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Critical Thinking: Arguments and non-Arguments
43:03
Fayetteville State University
Рет қаралды 77 М.
A Brief Intro to Normative Ethics
15:21
The Wandering Professor
Рет қаралды 41 М.