Cross Examination - Leading Questions

[@TTrAAsTT]

Objection: Leading

[@advocacytutor6354]

Sustained!!!

[@s.oddity3640]

Grounds?

[@estherforbes4517]

On point, helpful, totally impressive!!! A lot of thought went into the presentation of this series. I thank you Advocacy Tutor.

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you so much for your feedback Esther. More videos to come.

[@originalvonster]

5:15: Phrased as statements rather than questions

[@thongseehawong2551]

Thank you for producing this wonderful clip.

[@advocacytutor6354]

You are more than welcome.

[@amirs_]

Excellent. Hope to see more videos on court's procedure.

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you Amir. Yes, more to come.

[@nnadiezekiel6674]

It is the outburst of the Defence Counsel at end of the Cross-Examination for me. 😂 Excellent video!

[@advocacytutor6354]

Yes, she was crushed 😂😂. Thank's for your comment.

[@mekomahfavour2428]

Thanks, want more of this😊

[@advocacytutor6354]

More to come!

[@SuperstudentAcademy]

more please, i love these

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you for your comment. I will definitely posting more videos.

[@davisouzza8980]

Great explanation!

[@advocacytutor6354]

Glad it was helpful Davi.

[@schwarzerritter5724]

So leading quests are a trick to make witnesses to make a statement, even if you don't ask a question?

[@advocacytutor6354]

Not a trick, a technique!

[@yogeshpandya6438]

Very impressive indeed

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you Yogesh

[@lesilky1309]

I love your voice 😊and great video

[@advocacytutor6354]

❤️❤️

[@domenicavellino4205]

Needed this for the amber heard trial 😂

[@advocacytutor6354]

👍👍👍

[@madisonthompson8325]

I think we all did

[@advocacytutor6354]

@@madisonthompson8325 Thank you so much.

[@anonymoushuman8443]

What if any leading questions can be asked ?

[@advocacytutor6354]

👏👏👏👏

[@cynthiasandyglover9394]

I like this

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thanks Cynthia, I'm glad you found the video useful.

[@TheThelenita]

Would you be so kind to clarify - if it is it important to ask leading questions why are they objected then?

[@advocacytutor6354]

Lawyers object to questions in cross examination not because they are formulated as leading questions, but for other reasons such as lack of relevance, lack of foundation, the questions are compound (more than one fact/question at once), or the witness has already answered the question.

[@TheThelenita]

@@advocacytutor6354 But what about when the lawyer says: "Objection:leading"? According to the webpage - dictionary law com such an objection means: "Leading is improper if the attorney is questioning a witness called by that attorney and presumably friendly to the attorney's side of the case."

[@advocacytutor6354]

@@TheThelenita Correct. In examination in chief (direct examination) leading questions are not permissible, except in limited circumstances. I have a video that explains this in detail: kzbin.info/www/bejne/hGSXda2Dgrx8kLc

[@TheThelenita]

@@advocacytutor6354 Thank you very much for clarifying.

[@mdmostafizurrahman3687]

very helpful.

[@advocacytutor6354]

Glad it was helpful!

[@ahadrajameerrajameer7260]

@@advocacytutor6354 plz hindi m kijiye

[@kktv3284]

Very nice ..thanks

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you.

[@thatstuff660]

Isn’t a leading question used only in direct examination?

[@advocacytutor6354]

Leading questions should not be asked in direct examination, (except in limited circumstances). If you've been watching the Depp v Heard trial you will have seen Camille Vasquez's objections to the leading questions asked by Amber Heard's counsel.

[@solidairandpokemon9738]

Nice video and very imformative, but I don't really think the music matches the mood. Other than that, this video is great.

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you for the constructive feedback and for taking the time to comment. Much appreciated.

[@banarasisharma4672]

Good

[@rabmuhammad5153]

good

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thanks

[@newsbet7]

Nice

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you

[@milimat8988]

Love animation

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you Mili Mat.

[@ngcebopritchardt2084]

❤❤

[@commonerIndian]

nice

[@advocacytutor6354]

Glad you like it.

[@herseem]

The central content is good, but the presentation style is really wooden. It needs to speed up. It sounds like a child reading in class - it needs to sound more conversational. Drop the music - it doesn't add anything at all and distracts from the content, when the content is all talking. I get why you added the 'humour' at the end but in my view it doesn't work, not entirely appropriate and just slows down the video. Even when you're learning stand-up comedy they treat it seriously and don't add unnecessary humour. The animation is fine but doesn't add much, but script appearing on the screen would work just as well and would benefit some people more than the animation. The example is useful though.

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you for taking the time to comment.

[@betr8]

College students are here

[@advocacytutor6354]

👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@mohammadrahman9698]

Where is the logic here? Not all assault results in noticeable physical injury. Yes, the defendant might have acted disproportionately by stabbing in response to the physical assault...But how was he to know the attacker would not injure him severely?

[@JDC2890]

A redirect examination may help here. The defendant's attorney would then need to ask him about stuff the prosecution said, and allow him to testify about stuff like why he believed he was being assaulted even though he sustained no injuries. Of course, a redirect examination would need to be followed up by another cross-examination.

[@ShakurCapital]

👍🏽

[@advocacytutor6354]

Thank you Shakur Capital.

[@ahadrajameerrajameer7260]

Kya koi is vedio ki hindi kr skta h

[@JRBROOKS42]

Every time I take a cop to trial I win tickets get dismissed because of no evidence !! 🐽🐽🐽🐽🎥🎥🎥🐷🐷🐷😂😂😂😂

[@advocacytutor6354]

👌🏾👌🏾👌🏾

[@glonzai2005]

coming hear amber heard trial

[@advocacytutor6354]

👏👏👏👏

[@ThePrimeMinisterOfTheBlock]

.. was that a cross? It sounded like an extension of the other's sides examination in chief

[@JDC2890]

The first cross-examination was basically how NOT to do it.

[@JosoSz]

Where's the band? lol

[@advocacytutor6354]

😱😱😱

[@martylynchian8628]

Why are people wearing wigs?

[@docastrov9013]

Evil. The poor guy was assaulted and you don't care. You just want a conviction because "the police arrested him".