Statistical Review of World Energy 2024

The CSIS Energy Security & Climate Change Program is pleased to host Nick Wayth, Chief Executive of the Energy Institute (EI), for a presentation and discussion of the 2024 EI Statistical Review of World Energy.
Following the presentation, Daniel Yergin, Vice Chairman of S&P Global, and Joseph Majkut, Director of the CSIS Energy Security and Climate Change Program, will join Nick Wayth for a discussion on the highlights of the EI Statistical Review of World Energy. Kevin Book, Managing Director, ClearView Energy Partners, will moderate. Additional speakers may be announced.
The EI Statistical Review of World Energy presents data on global energy production, consumption, trade, and emissions through the prior year. Download the 2024 EI Statistical Review of World Energy here.
This event is made possible by general funding to CSIS and the CSIS Energy Security & Climate Change Program.
---------------------------------------------
A nonpartisan institution, CSIS is the top national security think tank in the world.
Visit www.csis.org to find more of our work as we bring bipartisan solutions to the world's greatest challenges.
Want to see more videos and virtual events? Subscribe to this channel and turn on notifications: cs.is/2dCfTve
Follow CSIS on:
• Twitter: csis
• Facebook: CSIS.org
• Instagram: csis

[@deandimattia4516]

Adding mineral capacity growth and limitations and the impact on energy diversification and growth would be insightful.

[@jonathanbethune9075]

Im reminded of the behaviour of slime molds again. That was appreciated.

[@Buy_YT_Views_227]

Your love gives me wings I'm flyin! BIG MOOD.

[@jackshultz2024]

I’m curious to know if there has been any advance in the development of geothermal energy.

[@Chris-bm5qd]

Yes, there has. You're welcome.

[@robertprawendowski2850]

⭐

[@life42theuniverse]

How much solar energy is needed to make all the weather? How much energy is needed to grow all the life?

[@life42theuniverse]

It’s great to know that industry(economy) is developing in a green direction, but how much energy does our life support systems(biosphere/weather/ocean currents/...) need?

[@life42theuniverse]

In the heart of the earth, a treasure sleeps, Fossil fuels, like secrets, buried deep. Once abundant, now they wane, Their scarcity, humanity's bane. Silent whispers of ancient days, Burned for light, heat, and the engine's blaze. But now the wells grow dry and tired, While the world's demand has not retired. The sun and wind, we harness true, Yet their power seems but a meager due. The rivers run, the turbines turn, But the energy gap continues to yearn. Beneath our feet, the coal beds thin, Oil wells echo, an empty din. Gas fields falter, their bounty spent, Leaving us in energy lament. Renewables rise, with promise bright, Yet struggle to match the fossil's might. For the populations ever swell, In energy needs, we're caught in a spell. As the sun sets on the fossil age, We face a turning, unwritten page. Can we adapt, will we find a way, To power the world by the break of day? A question hangs in the smoky air, A challenge for all, to do their share. To innovate, conserve, and care, For the energy future we all share. -GPT4

[@HealthZo]

😊😊😊😊

[@altabanff]

to survive politically we need cheap energy, to survive climate change we need expensive energy now!

[@wrighttacks]

Most dissuasion here was for electricity production---which is only 20% of our energy mix. The rest is mostly fossil. The likelihood of replacing all energy use by so -called alternatives (which by the way they are not renewable or 'green) is virtually impossible because there is not enough fossil energy left to make that kind of build out (they are all made with fossil fuel). The math is not there (Tom Murphy). The only solution to a decrease in emissions is to use less--allot less. With countries around the world wanting higher living standards the emissions will continue to climb--6.4 billion folks in this position. It appears the only way to use less is to run out of it---or god forbid raise the price to create demand destruction. Politically that is not possible. This discussion, while not even discussing climate, did nothing but talk about growth. Growth my friends is the problem. It has to stop one way or another. Next year's charts will continue to show the same pattern and will only change when there is a steep decline of available fossil fuels---probably not before it is way to late. You need to have a real discussion here and not pussy-foot around.

[@epapanak]

I very disappointed with the high degree of non expert discussion. It is worldwide very evident form the hidden data that the quickest and cheapest energy transition to renewables is by enabling households to develop their own renwablr energy

[@stoppelbeise37p]

Мой паспорт.

[@FlameofDemocracy]

Primary energy is going massless, over time. These types of energy streams are far more valuable, than matter based ones. The other trend to watch for would be replacement of thermal-dynamics with electrodynamics. Implicit bias would slow the realization of this theoretical evolution for a civilization-wide upgrade. However, more and more decision makers will see the wisdom of energy systems modernization.

[@MercuryCold]

😂

[@danieloconnor548]

This is more BS than truth