U.S. Supreme Court hears Challenges to Texas Abortion Law

U.S. Supreme Court hears Challenges to Texas Abortion Law
www.c-span.org/video/?515559-...
Download the FREE C-SPAN Now App. www.c-span.org/c-spanNow/
Discover the C-SPAN Video Library at www.c-span.org/quickguide/ Download our App www.c-span.org/special/?radioapp C-SPAN: Created by Cable in 1979. Offered as a public service. Subscribe to our KZbin channel: / cspan Follow us: Facebook: / cspan Twitter: / cspan Instagram: / cspan Subscribe: C-SPAN Podcasts: www.c-span.org/podcasts/ Newsletters: www.c-span.org/connect/ #cspan

[@bluewin13]

A lot of people in this comment section clearly don't understand what this case is about (despite the fact that the fundamental question at hand is written on the screen) and keep screaming and crying about the morality of abortion as if that has anything to do at all with this case. There's a reason why even the most conservative justices are showing skepticism towards Texas's argument. This isn't about the constitutionality of abortion at all

[@jreid2171]

Exactly

[@camwyn256]

Yup. That's why Kavanaugh keeps bringing up how this same crap could be pulled to take away our guns

[@Archangel251]

@@camwyn256 I’m strongly pro life, but using that logic, I would likely be skeptical about the law too

[@177SCmaro]

Perhaps that's the point. It should be about the ethics of killing the unborn, not about whatever the government calls "a law" this week?

[@Zachw2007]

The Dobbs case from Mississippi is the real beef in this section of law.

[@JhonnySerna]

Justice Sotomayor: “A state is an idealized entity. The whole fiction of Ex party young had to be created because the state qua state cannot act. It can only designate people to act for it. And if so the state had designated whether its ordinary citizens or the attorney general or district attorneys to act for it.”

[@177SCmaro]

Pretty much rhetorical gobbledygook the moment you realize "the state" isn't an entity, in fact, it does not exist. It's merely a concept at the center of a faith-based belief in the "legitimacy" of rulers, which stems from a very old belief in "the anointed shall rule in the name of God or the gods". Belief in the idea of people acting at the behest of "a state" is no more rational than the belief in the idea of people acting at the behest of Santa Clause. These are people doing irrational and immoral things and deflecting accountability by pretending "the state/government said so, I don't make the laws".

[@KevinLacey2sultry4you]

JUSTICE SOTOMAYER REALLY DESPISE THE IDEA THAT THERE IS A THING CALLED INDEPENDENCE AND PEOPLE SHE BELIEVES IS NOT AS "SMART" as her and HER QUESTIONS COME OFF AS "MY STATS AND FACTS REIGNS SUPREME!" what a shame!

[@alex-brs]

​@@177SCmaroSovcit much?

[@rachaunadixon2768]

My takeaways from this are #1 Judging from conservative judges questioning they are either playing dumb or are actually dumb. A high schooler could easily beat them out on intelligence if this isn't all an "act" #2 Why doesn't HIPPA come into affect in terms of citizens being able to sue? How would said citizen have proof of abortion without HIPPA violation?

[@ZoZei03]

*I know this comment is a year old, I just work in healthcare and wanted to answer it in case anyone else wondered the same thing for any reason* Because you can suponea the office and/or hospital for the medical records and it states in the HIPAA act who is allowed access to said records. Legal authorities have the right to suponea. There's also clauses of "Third Parties" and also signing a consent form which is why you're asked when you visit if there is anyone you want to give consent for to access your records. For example: Car A slams into Car B and Car A goes to the hospital. Car B is found liable for the car accident but their insurance company states that the accident was not severe enough to cause the injuries that Car A says the endured. They can suponea the hospital to get Car A's medical record and review the ER visit. If Car A said they had a broken leg, but on the medical record in the ER the doctors notes/the x rays state that there is no broken leg, Car A's request to pay that medical bill gets thrown out for any amounts related to broken legs. OR If you're the patient you're legally allowed to your medical record, and not just your e-chart medical record. You have the legal right for all notes, charts, images, etc which is why let's say if you got an xray and the results come up, but not the images on your e-chart, you can write the hospital to request the actual pictures from it for your records no matter if they found something or not.

[@juliodyarzagaray]

I'm conservative. I hope this get's stricken down. Don't care if you think this means I'm not a true conservative.

[@meonlybro]

The more the liberals get their way the more the country as a whole loses

[@whatthefrickbro]

Yeah don’t ever call yourself “conservative”, you sanction the death of innocent life because it’s unwanted.

[@juliodyarzagaray]

@@meonlybro A fair point. They will NEVER stop.

[@greensky9530]

Glad to hear it. Abortion should not be a political issue. I may not support it (not saying I do or don't,) but I am a man, and therefore have no right to make a decision for women. But more importantly, this law threatens all of our constitutional rights. Not just abortion-- this could theoretically apply to speech, religion, etc. Also: meonlybro, come on man. This attitude it what's wrong with America. These labels we slap on people-- liberal, conservative, democratic, republican-- all it does is polarize our country. Not all liberal ideas are good: but a lot are. Same for conservative. The ISSUE is polarization, missinformation, lack of belief in science (and politicalization of scientific fact) and the inability for Americans to compromise, or even listen to the other side.

[@estatesales9818]

Abortion is the physical and tangible arm of socialism. It is population control and a different type of conservatism that is fascism. The original Republican movement of the 1850's and anti-Masons would never have condoned abortion.

[@EfficientRVer]

After watching all 3 hours, it sure looks like the Texas law is going down at least 5-4, probably more. When even Thomas is squirming and thinking he may have to swing the other way, 9-0 even becomes possible on one of these cases, maybe in exchange for the other one going 4-5 on a technicality to make the public think it was a close call. The conservative justices know that if they let Texas go ahead with this vigilante bounty system against law-abiding citizens, a dozen states will pass identical bounty laws on gun owners, people wearing MAGA hats, people flying drones, people not wearing masks, and all sorts of other things. Then they'll be swamped with stupid cases, but have their hands tied by this one.

[@bestproto5117]

Were do you get your news from? CBS CNN MSNBC PBS?

[@michaelcarter7079]

I don't live in Texas, however if a was one of the judges, I would be one that would allow Texas law is to remain in effect. The abortion rights question remains to be answered by state and local governments, not US government level. The reason for this is because as per the 10th amendment to the constitution, things not directly addressed in the constitution is to go back to the states. If read the constitution and the amendments there is no wording regarding abortions, yet there is wording in the constitution regarding the protection of life. Medical research show through current technology such as ultrasounds, has proven that a child is a child from conception foward. This might to extreme for most, so states at large are going with heartbeat bill as where states at that point foward has an vested interest in protecting them just like it does with all its citizens.

[@bluewin13]

@@bestproto5117 OP is demonstrating an acute understanding of the national implications at hand, which include blue states placing a de facto bans on guns using a similar law that Texas placed on abortions. Allowing Texas to defy federal authority to this degree would set a disastrous precedent that is bad for both liberals and conservatives. Kavanaugh mentions this point, in fact. Did you even bother to watch the video before deciding to write idiotic comments?

[@bluewin13]

@@michaelcarter7079 Try to actually understand SB 8 (the Texas law in question) and what it entails before blindly supporting it because you care so much about fetal matter. The Court isn't concerned about the constitutionality of abortion. This case is solely concerned with the question of "Should Texas be allowed to use the tactics it is using to evade federal review?" Texas knows it cannot ban abortions by law since it would violate Roe v Wade, so it's essentially employing private citizens as bounty hunters to enforce the ban through lawsuits while arguing in bad faith that the state has no involvement in the process (since all the enforcement is done by private citizens) and is thus not in violation of Roe (which is solely concerned with the actions of the state). Allowing this law to stand would open a can of worms that would lead to an avalanche of constitutional violations across the country. If this precedent is set, who can stop, say, California from using similar tactics to ban the unvaccinated from ever going church again for the rest of their lives, and then arguing that there's no state violation of the First Amendment since all the enforcement is done by private citizens? What about forcing all churches and pastors in the state to officiate same-sex marriages? Or outlawing the mere act of speaking negatively about same-sex marriage in church? What about banning guns? These can all be easily done using the Texan method. Nobody here cares about "protection of life" or fetal heartbeats. It's all utterly irrelevant to this case. This is about protecting the constitution itself and the structural integrity of our judicial system.

[@michaelcarter7079]

@@bluewin13Thanks for the comments. It reallly did help. What is not mentioned though is Roe VS Wade was a court decision that wasn't settled by the legislature. It was purely made up decision by the US supreme court in 1973 with no legally bound documents to support this decision. The constitution and the declaration of independence talks alot about the protection of life however. Because of this since the decision was not settled, Texas and any other state can come up with its own laws regarding abortions and woman health issues per the 10th amendment stating that questions not addressed by our founding documents are delegated to the states and local governments. This was the intentions of the leaders who signed our constitution that states is were the political power was to concentrated not at the national level. Roe vs wade decision was exact opposite of this position of legislative and historical US documents in that this decision was stripped from the states and is treated differently with special privileges not offered to other laws and causes that do have constitutional rights to be addressed. Over turning ROE vs wade will rebalance this and protect women at large. Even if my understanding is incorrect, it is far better to error on the side of life, than the side of death. Abortion rights is not protected at the US level constitutionally as is the right to free speech and to come together peacefully, or the right to bare arms, the right to fair and impartial justice, the right of private property to not be searched without probable cause. These decisions mentioned above and others were addressed in the constitution so states are legally bound to adhere to these rights. That's why I don't think the argument you are making holds any water. Now if Abortion rights were addressed in our legal documents, then your statement would hold water and my argument would collapse on itself. The reason for this back and forth with this position is in direct response to unanswered questions by our legislature not addressing issue through legal protocols. Courts are not to because a second legislature branch, it is to interpret laws and historical documents to answer legal questions. This was not the case with abortion and so US supreme court dosen't have jurisdiction over this matter.

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

A man should be able to 911 or text it with out getting fucked up by police and first response. Thank you.

[@dionnefreelance]

What does an attorney general have to do with this?

[@dionnefreelance]

Anybody being forced just might be unconstitutional?

[@jascam1]

Some of the U.S Allies are the worst violators of human rights, especially women and children, yet they maintain strong relationships. In keeping with this practice the U.S Supreme courts is poised to keep women down by denying the right of CHOICE with their bodies.

[@johnlove2954]

I do not think killing children is a human right

[@dionnefreelance]

Please pay your fees for the allegedly non constitutional issue, in this courtroom.

[@DOLsenior]

Solve the problem by all women and men who support a woman's right to choose just move out of Texas and have all the people who disagree with that right move in. Then Texas can supply medical care and financial support to the mothers and the children, many, many children until those children are 24 or for life if the child has a medical issue that prevents them from independence. This should include quality education, medical insurance, housing, savings, clothing, mental health support... ALL of it... even financial, mental health support to the family of a woman who dies as a result of giving birth or dies because an embryo has died in her body and she develops an infection and suffers or dies as a result. And unless Texas secedes from the union let's impose federal financial sanctions for everything if they refuse to respect the constitution. Let's see how Texas handles THAT. Also, make it manditory that all those wonderful people who impose their religious and moral beliefs on others are forced to care for the many babies that might end up in orphanages, instead be placed in all homes of anyone, at random.. there would be a list..like jury duty but this jury duty would be a 24 year case.

[@dionnefreelance]

Well this is the Federal Supreme Court

[@dionnefreelance]

What's a SB8(a)?

[@dionnefreelance]

Did you say a criminal violation?

[@mikeb.2925]

Life begins when you get a job and start paying taxes. All the rest is moot

[@177SCmaro]

As far as government and politics is concerned that appears to be the case, unfortunately. If fetuses could vote abortion would be outlawed tomorrow.

[@andrewgilbertson5356]

Thank you from England

[@conradhopemanley3714]

It's my jugdement call say nothing in these sytle of cases but kick the case out is suggested with out a argument to signal for disspacthes

[@JerseyFrank]

The statement on private parties should follow lines of Shelley v Kraemer. When a private parties use the courts to enforce a code. Those private parties are subjected to public policy. I don’t believe the main issue is the removal of federal oversight from direct issues. Marijuana and the several states that have legalized its recreational status despite the federal labeling of illicitly, they are a few issues too late. Department of Insurance in that instance hasn’t said anything about automotive accidents and the recreational use of Marijuana. Abortion bans places the idea of a life with a heart beat at the hands of the Supreme Court, not removing them from the legal issue.

[@bestproto5117]

Im not an expert in the law so i don't get this mess I thought this was a lawsuit between the federal government and Texas Why is there third parties in this ? And what is the court going to do? Are they going to decide whether the law is constitutional? Or are they going to decide whether the federal government has the right to sue

[@JerseyFrank]

They are attempting to see if the federal government will intervene on this legislative enactment. That drug policy is having detrimental effects on individual lives that being portrayed as one sided because of taxation on goods. The states Department of Insurance and Department of Banking should have enough information to give the rest of the states a clear indication of the effects this policy is having. The law has barely gone into effect less than 60 days and people are already complaining on the states “governance” over individual rights. All the state is doing is telling people they cannot remove a living fetus from their body after 6 weeks. I just feel like there are other states that are removing issues from the United States Supreme Court that are a greater detriment to the majority of the population and not just one gender.

[@therienacevedo841]

Who was the lawyers in the casé

[@therienacevedo841]

Why court never send papers

[@andrewgilbertson5356]

Hello from England

[@dionnefreelance]

Does hemphill still have jurisdiction

[@dionnefreelance]

Did you say enforce?

[@moonovermiami9787]

The basis of this lawsuit by Federal doesn't make sense. Its not within a Clerk's job perview to refuse or accept a filing.

[@moonovermiami9787]

@@kqatsi Don't change the subject. Don't interject what does not apply. Procedural is different, ie; Missing law citation,relevant paragraphs, etc. But, It's not in any Clerk's preview to simply refuse a legal filing which cites law simply bcz the suit doesn't align with his/her politics and personal beliefs. That's what the feds are asking for; that ANY law suit should be subject to and must be approved by personal opinion of Clerk.

[@dragonflarefrog1424]

Which is why they go after state judges and clerks.

[@moonovermiami9787]

@@kqatsi A Clerk works for the state or state entity. Clerk's obligation is to State Law, State Constitution. The Clerk is neither hired for, or determined at hire to be qualified or to decide if a State law is in line with the US Constitution. Its above clerk's payscale. That's what the attorney who prepared the case and a judge/court are for. If Clerks can decide what reaches a court or doesn't, under what parameters?.. Furthermore, the 10th Amendment is a main consideration. States formed the federal govt. and are sovereign, independent and not subject to federal law that is not in the constitution. And then by decimating separation of powers... as if any random person can decide whatever. (!??) You should listen close to what the justices say in the beginning of this hearing. You might learn something.

[@moonovermiami9787]

@@kqatsi You're the one not understanding what's going on. The Federal court does not have this jurisdiction. In fact, no court has. For the simple reason that all suits will then be equally affected.

[@moonovermiami9787]

@@kqatsi You better spit shine your crystal ball.

[@conradhopemanley3714]

In there arguement they say there is risk to harm And they need to be impune In Congress there a answer for this a mob can settle that dispute I deside the word that applys to a mob might be faver or against its left to the mob if there is any harm from suspected legal abuse

[@dionnefreelance]

Are they constitutional State rules?

[@usaneebee7314]

Nang seng none nationalty shan myamar . From lih royal family . Shan state

[@dionnefreelance]

What do you mean by remedy?

[@ulkairvillan3219]

The main moral argument in the question of abortion is when does a mass of cells become a human being. Is it once the egg is fertilized or does it have to be born. Is it somewhere in between. This is important because every human being deseves protection not just from the mother but also from the state society.

[@DOLsenior]

24 weeks is the point at which doctors will take steps in an attempt to save a premature baby. Prior to that the premature baby, even with extreme medical intervention will not survive.

[@humanseeksjustice8830]

Dear Supreme Court Justices: I'm a liberal but think that the vac mandates are not constitutional. Once we lose our freedoms, what's the use of having a constitution or court? Unless there is an amendment to take our right to say no to treatments, you should kindly find against the Federal mandates. Most people won't say no to mask but forced shots are definitely unconstitutional. I support BLM, Civil Rights, etc but this shot, I don't support. Thanks for your time.

[@DB-gl3jx]

Keep roleplaying, as if they bother reading the KZbin comment section

[@DivineKingsBeloved]

We pray for Moral clarity for Life! For each Judge! As. Each person, will answer to God for every idle word that is spoken! It will be our own words that we will be justified or condemned, On judgement day! Matthew 12:36,37; 🙏So be it, Amen!🙏Amen!🙏

[@conradhopemanley3714]

The consituion is back in the second bill if you try to abuse the consituion with fornosey requests or additions you wait till I impent the second bill

[@dionnefreelance]

Who's the law enforcement?

[@dionnefreelance]

An injunction is a remedy against rights being violated by certain causes, and are for seeking damages, In certain court related instances.

[@usaneebee7314]

For japan royal family pl follow supreme court decision .

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If it's unconstitutional we will act act even if we don't

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I am the enforcer if law in Texas

[@conradhopemanley3714]

No none legal terms pls

[@conradhopemanley3714]

Luckily I can do any thing with smoke but I don't know how

[@dionnefreelance]

You meant it maybe a matter for the constitution?

[@dionnefreelance]

Did you say an enforcement

[@rvdjt8874]

Jesucristo es Dios

[@therienacevedo841]

Who give permision for traductor

[@dionnefreelance]

Do you feel like it's the segregation people or the people that have came into this country ?

[@insanisstultitia3119]

- Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones. - Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass. - And it came to pass, that at midnight the LORD smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. - Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished. - Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. - Then Menahem smote Tiphsah, and all that were therein, and the coasts thereof from Tirzah: because they opened not to him, therefore he smote it; and all the women therein that were with child he ripped up. - Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. - Who smote the firstborn of Egypt, both of man and beast. - The same dealt subtilly with our kindred, and evil entreated our fathers, so that they cast out their young children, to the end they might not live. - To him that smote Egypt in their firstborn: for his mercy endureth for ever: - And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live. - Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men. - Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have ripped up the women with child of Gilead, that they might enlarge their border: - As for Ephraim, their glory shall fly away like a bird, from the birth, and from the womb, and from the conception.

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I endorse the federal and do not allow Congress to act until it is lawfull in any case Congress just argue And unless there is imdeute harm they may not act

[@GustavoSanchez-qw6yn]

Abortion is practiced since the beggining of humanity. The ancient cultures practiced abortion because not enough natural resourses, for example. Abortion is still practiced on these days in the "civilized cultures" for many reazons, specially in democratic nations.

[@laurahamer9165]

So is prostitution, murder , genocide, theft, its always been around is a fact of history but not an improvement of ethos.

[@mylittlekittens]

@@laurahamer9165 But those other practices you listed have nothing to do with family planning. Parents have the right to decide when they want to have children and how many they want to care for.

[@Someone-nv1cj]

I am all for abortion and against this bill but I am for the bill if the women are given more time. You cant abort once a fetus starts developing a proper brain,it's murder after that.

[@177SCmaro]

So was slavery. That doesn't make it rational or moral to enslave anyone. That something is old doesn't make it rational or moral.

[@177SCmaro]

@@Someone-nv1cj It's murder from conception. The fact that a human does not yet have a fully formed or functional brain doesn't make them not human.

[@therienacevedo841]

What the court know about hack spam etc

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I just said that any one can sue any person with any abortion as America said they have to much power for abortions and knew of injustice why are you argueing the case

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If the court does not presue then I do

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If sumone is beating the law and it can't be brought to hauge in case of misstake its settled by disspacthes a above the law person to settle the case

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If it's not in the condition it's not getting in

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If there laws aren't bonafied the human rights in war how can we use this We will wait until it gets them aswell

[@dionnefreelance]

Babies are not state policies?

[@jimscott1246]

Like they'll pay any more attention to this than they did to roe vs Wade. A closed mind yields no justice, just insult. But isn't that really what you had your minds set on all along

[@usaneebee7314]

But they block my fb again n did not update .

[@usaneebee7314]

Nang seng none had never created climat summit n Cop 26 summit . N who created this summit for can have in italy also i did not know too .

[@dionnefreelance]

I thought this was about abortion Texas?

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I find this court guilty of mockery to hear this case And list weman health care as propiganda with a missleading name Why are you saying consitutional right Congress wasn't around when the co sition nor may it edit the document

[@conradhopemanley3714]

The condition is the whole consituion if any part of it ends it is not the condition Witch will be secert In relation to the last line If it is not enculded in this document it's not getting in And only thos that know the consituion can argue it

[@DivineKingsBeloved]

We humbly pray for Moral clarity for Life! For each Person! As. Each person, will answer to God for every idle word that is spoken! It will be our own words that we will be justified or condemned, On judgement day! Matthew 12:36,37; 🙏So be it, Amen!🙏

[@helenjimenez9748]

Shouldn't a woman that had to go through a choice of either aborting or sustaining their pregnancy, be the one who should be talking to these judges?...Just saying...

[@aloysiuspendergast7221]

no, they can talk to their own personal attorneys. This is the supreme court, not a townhall meeting.

[@helenjimenez9748]

@@aloysiuspendergast7221 Then the Supreme Court has to change.

[@liamj.mcmars8383]

Abortion is a medical procedure ment for incidents of Rape, incest, or medical injury/death of the Mother or child. Maybe some promiscuous men and women shouldn't be misusing a medical procedure for birth control.

[@usaneebee7314]

Queen elizabeth ii n btitain royal family Give nang seng none crown queen Royal My vaccien share payment My queen lifestyle Nang seng none queen certificate My queen royal stamp cop full 1 set back now .

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

Please send whatever help with immgratns with red cross let them vices and rent hotels thank they apparently at here to visit from anxiety.

[@aaagggmmmsss]

excellent

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If you çan lose your medical lince in a trid trimester jugdement call if any mistake Why wouldn't a docter not lose his lince if he is going to abort wrong with no reason or risk to any party part from the inplent and procedure And that is that there is no requirement for even a infertile egg to be used a inplment

[@therienacevedo841]

Scared about what

[@conradhopemanley3714]

The first bill the costiuon is not important

[@therienacevedo841]

Cnn logo represent hospital machine

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

15 years 10 mins xs 365 .

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

Decide by 3 or 5. If not 7 in a given day or night.

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

To get into my business office without respecting my mother's authority as president of housekeeping as a Catholic saint. With strip clubs as well.

[@user-dy6bl5fh7v]

Just to procreate overnight to be cheated on after engagément. A crazy obsession to keep running Vegas with my permission lacking respects as a boss for my affirmative action

[@johnponte6593]

i dont think it's the right choice, but it may be for someone else! There should be freedom to decide per the parents, period.

[@megaMagaManX8]

Freedom to murder children in the womb yes. Most definitely

[@trufflesrheaven]

@@megaMagaManX8 a fetus is attached to the uterus, and the uterus is connected to the woman. She has the right to remove part of her body. It's a constitutional right under "Right of Privacy" which is under "Due Process". 14th Amendment. Look it up.

[@johnlove2954]

@@trufflesrheaven nope

[@thharrimw]

That is not the legal question

[@DB-gl3jx]

@@johnlove2954 looks like someone failed their first year biology classes

[@therienacevedo841]

Why supreme court cut My coussin

[@conradhopemanley3714]

You will answer you will answer to me gold fire for ever in any defendant

[@vx4982]

LORD-GOD still has the final say so WHY? Cuz He is the one & only can make life no one else.

[@conradhopemanley3714]

Gold fire in all cases

[@conradhopemanley3714]

The laws are not bonafied

[@therienacevedo841]

The law said 2part in court i never been in court

[@tonilharmon]

What is with the new format? It sucks.

[@Archangel251]

The court resumed in-person arguments

[@theforgottensoldiers3445]

I'm tired of telling people this is happing this is what's coming but no one listens well god's bout to take it out of my hands and he's going to hammer down

[@conradhopemanley3714]

When the person on disspacthes does it right he does not target any of the ring leaders he targets the arms and legs of the followers to qwell the ring leaders are prosicuted and after the person on disspacthes may do any thing to them and it's aloud in there case the arms and legs are not all stood on topic yet and I must wait while i wait they can suffer

[@CanadianBear47]

we are still here. oof

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If the clerk is getting prosicute is the ultimate that the court is illgeal oboulsy But it has never happened

[@jwjones1979]

Learn to spell and how to put a sentence together properly. You're not helping your cause by being illiterate.

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I the comading office am the rights hold the mother of the child does not get rights in this case

[@conradhopemanley3714]

If a young person argues the law wait till you hear what happens to him If any young person thinks they will change me law they will be boiled alive I don't buy into any bull shit if your a young person punching above youer weight you will get the after life that goes along with it harm and punishment a young person isn't a nive or stupid thing presume them guilty of a offence even if there presumed to be acting coy to law

[@usaneebee7314]

Nang seng none FREE CHOOSE HER FUTURE HUSBAND BY HERSELF . NO ANY ONE ANY FAMILY ANY COUNTRY CAN BLOCK N DISTURP N INTERVE IN HER OWN DECISION CHOOSE HER FUTURE HUSBAND BY WORLD LAW Each FREEDAM WOMEN eligible .

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I was in the room smoking taboco like ussual

[@lovepeace9780]

Saint Joseph, protector of the Holy Infant Jesus and terror of demons Pray for us. . . . ....

[@conradhopemanley3714]

Why it was uncontional weman rare survive the procedure But it is the same conscept as now Illgeal name of corperate missleading name We will say it is health instead of killing things

[@conradhopemanley3714]

When the cases are brought to hauge it's a suspected war crime in all cases and may not affect law the hauge is final defence of law that if your argueing you will ether be delt by disspacthes in this case yes when I'm able or with the hauge the level above go to every extent and it ends with the exicutioner with the next step or the differed step if you beat the hauge it delcared dispatches if it's below or above its by any means

[@conradhopemanley3714]

To chilling effect I only put smoking tabco like usual and I may not argue other points in law but I'm the back up in the consituion all I can argue is smoking tabco like ussual as the constiuon says I must stick to my point and not enculde others Witch isn't listed it's just known This is chilling effect as all I can argue is I'm smoking taboco like ussual yet I'm required to protect all life in the errors of the consituion cuaseing harm in all documents forward as couldn't think of any as the consituion was pc And it was just things we needed and wouldn't go wrong

[@imbored6362]

Bro quit making ELEVEN COMMENTS talking about shit you know nothing about and learn how to spell "constitution" before pretending like you're smart

[@conradhopemanley3714]

S n 8 SNL Urgh no human rights for these people

[@usaneebee7314]

Prince michel ken london Driving pm modi india But The big a witch master driving whole engalan n eu n prince mickel ken london Is Ex pm thailand 85 years old Can be e yui father Ex king thailand ex father in law I only know n listen his voice video Channal . I Had never know his face n see his face yet He is with 2nd royal family chang mai poyuong north korea stay with prince andow they play politic together with thai side newyork side Mr par yut jan o char team side . . How they act Fighting They r one big mafia team . .

[@therienacevedo841]

Kill Any jugde avalaible

[@dionnefreelance]

If this is about the segregation people, you can forget it.

[@conradhopemanley3714]

A soft law bringer may carry a pistol

[@therienacevedo841]

Somenting and sound ilegal they court pay other yo

[@conradhopemanley3714]

Tought is impleney the implement is not the fetus

[@conradhopemanley3714]

I Herby sentce to ever lasting persicution in there life and after life with no dignity given And lands that allow abortion Will be abomination give them no say

[@dionnefreelance]

I. Am a victim of cps and Michelle kohlor, allegdely