LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD (2007) F-35 Scene Reaction/Breakdown

[@Long_Rifle]

The best moments are when mover just says “no”

[@evancrum6811]

Correct!!!

[@fishfinger1699]

and hits space at the same time

[@gabrielvazquez1691]

That's for sure

[@ironcladnomad5639]

It's right up there with, "Why."

[@PeiqiLi-RealLove]

@@fishfinger1699😂

[@vespanighthawk3792]

I'm quite fond of the "Mover ruins movies" name personally

[@josem.alfaro8116]

Agreed.

[@HyperzonYT]

ok

[@MCsAdvice]

i second that motion. All in favor to keeping it "Mover Ruins Movies" say Aye?

[@vespanighthawk3792]

@@MCsAdvice AYE!!

[@josem.alfaro8116]

@@MCsAdvice Aye aye cap.

[@nickringling]

I love when Mover says "It's just a movie." like he's trying to reassure himself. "I'm not gonna get mad...I'm not gonna get mad... it's just a movie.... it's not real...Bruce Willis can't hurt me."

[@toddie4usa1]

It's me I'm sensitive about my jets lol

[@protonjones54]

If anything Bruce is the one thinking at night "it's just a video Mover can't find me"

[@Austin.D]

IKR my dad can't even acknowledge that Lol

[@user-vc5rp7nf8f]

he's so stressed from this clip

[@MidnightSlayz]

@@protonjones54 😭

[@machalot]

The pilot acquired the target based entirely on "there's a terrorist truck in your sector". "I see them, Fox 2!"

[@firstnameherelastnamehere8814]

Bruce was smart he used the slower performance to draw the 35 into a circle fight

[@TheGeorgiaRover]

OMG...a Tank reference! And it’s the “pu$$y communist” one, at that! This video wins for that alone, sir. 🤘🏻😎🤘🏻

[@480JD]

I loved that movie as a kid.

[@ninjabearpress2574]

Half the movie that racist sheriff is shouting at people, his new favorite epithet.

[@jasonkitchin2038]

"the gun is also stealth" - classic

[@rlg1976x]

Mover: Physics don't apply! Me, an 18 wheeler over the road truck driver: Yeah, I noticed.....

[@ninjabearpress2574]

Watch a movie with an expert at your peril but I enjoy having the mistakes pointed out, it's funny stuff.

[@773superprguy]

I ride a motorcycle and top gear is what you need to do highway speed. what gear was he in that truck to move to higher gear on the bridge scene ? 😂

[@mikemesser4326]

First time I watched I didn't think the truck was that far gone. But yeah. I rewatched that part and he was well past. About the longest distance I have seen a heavily loaded truck make it in a turn in too high a gear it was a Mack with a 38foot feed tanker (80k GVWR). He made a 90 degree turn onto an on ramp in 7th gear - going too fast, of course. He ended up on 9 wheels for 78 feet before he panicked and hit brakes. That made the shoulder of the trailer instantly dig forward and down. Instant roll over. Very little damage to the trailer though. For the record, the driver had just been released from training - against the recommendations of his trainer. (It sucks to be a trainer and have your advice ignored. That happened to me with MY first student.)

[@charlesgantz5865]

I'm going to make my own accurate movie about Naval Aviation. It will show the Ready 5 fighter on the deck of the carrier with the pilot sitting in the hot sun for hours.

[@toddie4usa1]

Font forget the piddle packs 😆

[@charlesgantz5865]

@@toddie4usa1 Done. I'll list you as a technical advisor.

[@BierzeItboxer]

I see great things starting here. When release?

[@fyrep0w3r]

12:15 The Yak-38 also has an automatic ejection sequence for exactly the same reason as the F-35B. As it uses 3 engines to hover, if any one fails the aircraft will become uncontrollable immediately, so if it detects engine problems it automatically throws the pilot.

[@BungieStudios]

BF3 and BF4 macros had an auto eject feature. If your vehicle health drops below a certain amount, it will throw you out. Often at your detriment because you're out of the map or probably could recover. So annoying.

[@Bad_Wolf_Media]

8:22 - John McClane has the greatest situational awareness EVER. While fleeing from an attacking fighter aircraft, crashing through parked cars, with a highway overpass collapsing around him and driving around a big spiral onramp or something, he still knows EXACTLY where the "bad guy" van is in relationship to him.

[@jimmagwojo2718]

The degree to which Mover tries to rationally breakdown the irrational is so much fun.

[@skenzyme81]

3:27 “gawd… the worst one” I think I speak for everyone here when I say we want a quick-cut compilation of Mover just sh!tt!ng on the Fat Amy for like 10 minutes.

[@writingref]

Do it!

[@FarrellMcGovern]

My guess is that they are trying to do their take on the Harrier scene in True Lies.

[@glaabaglooba]

Physics aside, both of these are the badassest of scenes ever

[@zlatkovujevic7348]

The movie should named True lies 2, it would make more money as the Die hard franchise.

[@driftertank]

I vote keep it "Mover Ruins Movies." "Movies with Mover" just lacks the zing of your humor.

[@tchmilfan]

Actually it should be “Movies Ruins Movies”

[@Blackmoon9u9]

It should be physics ruins movies

[@Bad_Wolf_Media]

I'm just speculating here, but there is a chance that some of the videos that have been fought and/or blocked is because the copyright holders have no sense of humour and assume someone is talking crap about their movies, as implied in the "ruins" title. While he does that a little bit, he's mostly good-natured about it. But it's not like people yelling "foul" are actually watching the videos anyway.

[@jawn1568]

@@tchmilfan actually it should be "Movies Ruins Mover" because of all the brain cells he probably lost at this point, watching these movies

[@ninjabearpress2574]

I agree completely, Mover Ruins Movies is perfect.

[@DCYote1]

I do so enjoy these. You should check out 'The Rock'. There's a scene with "Air Force" F18's that I'd love to see your take on.

[@UH1Phil]

Maybe this whole scene was constructed initially with a helicopter, and they changed it during filming/production because the F35 was hot shit and a helicopter (used so much in other Die Hard movies) was not. Way cooler to have an F35 do all sorts of stunts with the VTOL thing. The missile sort of looks like a TOW by the way?

[@tapio83]

So..... bruce would jump on top of helicopter? I see a small issue here.

[@UH1Phil]

@@tapio83 I had holding onto the landing skids in mind, but that would be an interesting way to end the films lol

[@ninjabearpress2574]

I think you're right, someone said, "You know what would be really cool?" This movie was put together by eight year old boys.

[@shawn2443]

Mover Mangles Movies New t-shirt from Mover: “But…..NO”

[@marksumner2292]

So, you’re on the way to the range and a random guy on the radio calls you up and tells you to destroy a civvy truck on a busy road in a city and your just like ‘sure, no problem’. That is some pretty relaxed ROE he’s working to 😂

[@SynchronizorVideos]

Then he proceeds to cause multiple civilian casualties, cause millions if not billions of dollars in damage to infrastructure, and then destroy a 5th-gen fighter because he was flying like a dumbass. If this supposedly happened in 2006, he’s probably STILL getting his ass chewed out today.

[@int2str]

"Loss of tail rotor effectiveness" lol :D

[@soccerlube]

Mover, since you also fly helicopters, how about doing a "Movie with Mover" on the Blue Thunder movie for the Blue thunder vs the F16s?

[@RamadiTaxiDriver60M]

Damn...I just posted that...

[@TopRacer2002]

Now that's a good one. My favourite helicopter Vs one of my favourite fighters

[@TheZenbmx]

Yes, i've been asking for that one for a long time. Mover, PLEASE!!!

[@JF-lt5zc]

That would require him having to watch that movie.... I'm not sure I'd wish that on anyone. :)

[@varrunningtrains4112]

Man I love Blue Thunder. Decent movie and badass gunship

[@pigybak]

speaking of “Tank”, my favorite line, “I do believe I have you covered”.

[@DavidWilliams-nq6fj]

In Tank, the best line has to be “shoot that hippie”. When the biker jumps the cable out to the mud field.

[@ninjabearpress2574]

@@DavidWilliams-nq6fj "Hey what're you doing?" "Stealin."

[@JW_Reviews]

Anyone else want to see Mover react to the jet scene from Incredibles? 😂

[@johnlucas6683]

Yes, please! The one with the buddy spike.

[@frankfraxtor4726]

When he pauses the video just before the ejection sequence, note that the pilot has already changed his helmet back to the old, good Gentex 55 (or so!)😆

[@youtouchmeiyellrat]

I remember liking this movie up until this scene, then I was just ready for it to be over.

[@Kriegerdammerung]

*Me as a F35 pilot flying a v4gilion dollar jet* Unknown voice: Hey, go and destroy a lorry in downtown Me: No, I don't think so... Unknown voice: It's a very dangerous criminal Me: Go call the police, FBI?

[@twolfjaeger9626]

As soon as the forward lift fan ate whatever box that was, the rest of the engine is still going to provide thrust from the hot section and the vectored nozzle pointing toward the ground. The auto-eject system gives, if memory serves, three audible voice warnings with 0.3 second delay between each warning so you have time to get into good seat posture, then you're out of the plane. But by this point, the engine that's still providing downward thrust (there's no FOD ingestion to shell out the motor, yet, but the lift fan is clearly done) through the aft nozzle is going to flip the plane ass-over-nose, ejecting the pilot towards the truck (which he might actually clear it, my understanding is the seat is pretty good at correcting for airplane attitude) but definitely send the plane crashing into Bruce Willis and exploding instantly. Not that it matters, since they put guns under the intakes where some pretty important magic boxes go, so you're guaranteed to ground abort as soon as you start the integrated power package (the F-35's version of an APU).

[@subliminald6]

"Come on Raylan" A man of taste.

[@Aederex]

The Yak-38 (the original Soviet VTOL aircraft which had a liftjet system remarkably similar to the front lift fan in the F35) also had an auto-eject that triggered if it had an engine failure.

[@SkipTerrio]

These videos seem more like "Punishing Mover With Movies". 😆

[@EgorKaskader]

YaK-38 (the Soviet VTOL jet) did actually *also* have an automatic ejection system if some flight parameters during landing would go outside the normal. Given how often those things crashed, that must've saved dozens of lives.

[@FirstDagger]

Wonder if by extension the Yak-141 also would have and if Lockheed imported that lesson when they received the flight data to use on the F-35.

[@zloychechen5150]

@@FirstDagger i'm sure it did, because it had lift engines, like the 38, and it might not have had to carry over for them to come up with this idea (although it probably was carried over). If my memory doesn't deceive me, i think i read somewhere years ago that the f35 had some issues with the driveshaft for the fan or something, so it might be that's the reason they incorporated such a system, despite the f35b using a single engine for all of its vtol lift. Anyway, doesn't seem like a bad thing to have..

[@Gavrick89]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2SYeGt-p5qNm9U time 18:00 - real automatic ejection. Engine fail.

[@joro148]

Yesterday i watched Avengers /2012/ and the F 35 sequence there has pretty much the same issues. Great video.

[@TacoTacoma96]

On the DVD commentary the director and Bruce Willis mention that the truck scene at 8:40 was 100% real. They were both surprised that that it went over so far and landed back on its wheels. They then added the shots of Bruce hanging on to the steering wheel. They filmed the scene again but that time the truck flipped over. I should add its been years since I watched the commentary so my memory is a little fuzzy.

[@zloychechen5150]

Hey, Mover, the Yak-38 did auto ejections.

[@moirakadhan745]

Yeah it was tied to its hover mode, if the plane rolled past a certain angle iirc

[@orionprime2543]

Mover's disapointment on 11:26 is just priceless XD

[@KelsonArwhi]

I remember watching this movie with an old buddy of mine. As the roadway started collapsing he started singing the Team America theme song. Good times...

[@MajesticDemonLord]

"We don't use Bombs on our own Citizens" Ya might want to remind the President about that... he seemed a little confused...

[@markosporn8315]

Just love nickname "fat amy" and how she dances beyond those bridges with confidence 😂😂

[@tokyosan7906]

Don't change the name, its great the way it is!

[@MontytheHorse]

I love that Mover calls the RN’s 65,000 ton aircraft carriers ‘tiny’. 🤣

[@trazyntheinfinite9895]

Well they kinda are

[@LASirensWX]

I’ve seen them and there pretty big

[@cnlbenmc]

Compared to a monstrous 100,000 ton Nimitz or Ford Class Super Carrier; it is tiny.

[@ultmateragnarok8376]

Well, there's big as in 'this is a naval craft intended to carry several thousand for an extended period of time', and then there's big as in 'this ship has two different runways for deployment and recovery of multiple jet aircraft at once'. Relative to the latter, the former is kind of small.

[@WasabiSniffer]

I learn so much about aviation on here. There’s a short sequence with an f18 strike in The Rock, might be worth a look

[@CapStar362]

you mean the strike with the USAF F/A-18's and the fictitious "Thermite Plasma" Bombs

[@pbdye1607]

Almost every time you see a fighter jet flight stick in movies, it's a HOTAS Cougar or Warthog. TM even makes an F/A-18 stick but Hollywood will still use the F-16 stick.

[@LtDogoop]

I love the F-35 losing tail rotor effectiveness and starts spinning xD XD XD

[@atigerclaw]

The scene really does look like it was written for a helicopter in how the whole thing plays out, and then someone on the production team went: 'Wait, helicopters have been in every action movie since action movies were invented. How about something else... What if it was an _F-35?'_ I'm thinking this was written for something like an armed Little Bird. That helicopter has the armament that would do what this scene does, and would be small and nimble enough to work in this scene (albeit at great risk). Swap out the inaccurate AIM-9[OMNI] missiles that can't hit a truck at 300 feet (Never mind using an AtA missile on a ground vehicle) with some dumbfire rocket pods, and consider the machine guns are M-134s firing 7.62 or a GAU-17 with 12 milimeter. Then suddenly this sequence makes sense. This ISN'T a military jet just out for a Sunday flight fully armed. It's a surplus Little Bird (somehow) with lower end weapons piloted by an overly aggressive moron who takes his chopper into the weeds under these freeway stacks, has debris hit his tail rotor, and spins out of control until he crashes. I mean seriously, F-35 or not, this scene is stupid. John McClain does literally nothing but barely dodge something like four times, and the attacking aircraft defeats ITSELF. You can't even give John credit for doing anything clever to trick the F-35 into trapping itself. This isn't F-35 vs 18 Wheeler. This is F-35 vs Itself with McClain dynamically ducking for cover for four minutes straight.

[@take5DD]

OK. I'm not sure why there are so many that are triggered by what you're doing here. As a flight/airplane enthusiast, I say this to my buddies all the time. "No. That's not how it happens". You bring it to a whole other level with your insight and expertise. We need this. I love hearing this. You're not ripping on the movie. You're stating facts of what can and can't happen during these scenes. Great job. Keep it up.

[@praveendissanayake2509]

"fat Amy, sorry obese Amelia" - i just flipping died. How do you come up with these stuff mover? 😆😆

[@nguyentanphat3318]

"That truck no longer exists" Omg 🤣🤣😂😂

[@aaronsnatic2446]

Love these....Mover your facial expressions and comments make these hilarious, but also full of facts that non-aviators would not know about anyway.

[@hx20games77]

Well thank you for breaking down the mistakes

[@plainwrapper2008]

Great vid Mover, bloody good fun. yes the box that looked like a filing cabinet falling into the lift engine would drop the plane immediately but no he he kept it off the ground for ages. Keep the MRM's coming, I love watching them, Cheers.

[@willmorrell488]

The Yak-38 VTOL had an auto eject function but its sensors were often faulty and caused ejections even in stable hovers. Information gathered from the Yak-38 and 141 program would be used by Lockheed Martin after the collapse of the USSR to create the F35.

[@daytonpotter2359]

Not a movie, but you should do the T-38 scene from "For all mankind"

[@theejectionsite1038]

FYI this jet is equipped with a Phantom's H-7 ejection seat as seen by the handles (Manual Override is clearly visible in the stick scenes) and the headrest shape except they replaced the face curtain handles with a really dumb looking board to act as a headrest. No parachute installed too. Regarding canopy fracture systems, they do cause superficial cuts on activation which is why you should always fly with a visor down, not a problem on the F-35 due to the helmet mounted sight displays. The Tornado used the same system and they went to a dual visor system to give the crew the option of having the clear visor down all the time. It is a trade-off for the time saved in the ejection. A classic historical ejection is Brian Udell's supersonic ejection from an F-15E in a near vertical dive at Mach 1.15 with initiation being at about 6000ft as I recall. With the 0.4 second delay for the canopy, rear seat firing followed by another about 0.4 second delay for sequencing until the front seat fired Udell had less than 1.2 seconds before he would have hit the water in the seat before separation would have occurred. The USAF researched adding canopy breakers to the seats and that removed the need for the initial delay to allow for more rapid egress. Going thru the canopy of a F-15 and other aircraft without a canopy fracture system is possibly more hazardous due to the more random shearing of the material. Look for photos of Keith Gallagher's KA-6 'partial ejection' (a complete misnomer really.) His canopy fractured leaving serrated plexiglass aimed at his midsection due to his position in the jammed seat. In other cases that area of the canopy will be struck by the aircrew's legs which will break it, but the impact can cause injury too. They tried adding a canopy fracture to the F-16 but the transparency is up to an inch or so thick and the detonating cord would not reliably shear it enough to clear the pilot unless it was thick enough to cause injury or block visibility. The F-22 canopy is too strong as well. www.ejectionsite.com/pirep.htm - both Udell (Back in the Saddle) and Gallegher's reports are in there.

[@jasonbrattoli2813]

That was my favorite scene in the whole movie seeing John McLain holding on to tail about to jump off !! Awesome visual

[@MCsAdvice]

Mover: "He's 'trimming' at this point" Me: "He's what? Rimming?"

[@khandimahn9687]

The first Die Hard was about a normal man who went through hell and struggled just so he could have Christmas with his family. The series since then is about a cartoon character.

[@herbh9348]

Hilarious commentary C.W....couldn't stop laughing.

[@jacksonschadt7573]

I’m pretty sure that F-35B is actually the X-35B prototype. You can tell by the shape of the vertical stabs and how the VTOL fan system functions.

[@PetesGuide]

Yep! The production version has that big barn door speed brake cover over the lift fan.

[@arturhutsalyuk8994]

Fanfact about an automatic ejection: The Soviet VTOL Yak-38 also had an automatic ejection system. And since it had a rather poor safety record, it's easy to find videos of Soviet naval pilots actually use this feature

[@yolkiandeji7649]

Mover reviews the other Die Hard movies & compares his law enforcement career.

[@alexis1451]

They got most of the computer stuff wrong too, at least they're consistent.

[@jsbrads1]

The F35 could have been activated due to the ongoing “terrorist” event. Apparently this road is deserted.

[@DeepakKumar-cd8ny]

I knew this was unrealistic when I saw this movie but I loved this scene.

[@kevinmandrile5074]

Mover: "Physics don't apply." Me: "Yeah, I've noticed!" 😂

[@ASSASSIN19923]

is Die Hard John should be dead from first movie LOL

[@toddie4usa1]

We don't do Physics at the Skunk Works that's for amateurs LOL

[@eldritchmorgasm4018]

Hollyweird: 🤡 "Actualy it's gonna be supereasy, barely an inconvenience!"

[@kevinmandrile5074]

@@eldritchmorgasm4018 Ryan George as Producer Guy: "Oh really?"

[@chriszilar3657]

Part 2….loved your analysis. Can’t say I was surprised but it was hilarious. Thanks for doing this….very entertaining. But I still love this movie … lots of great ass kicking🤘

[@thechamp8162]

KEEP THE SAME NAME please i find it hilarious 😂

[@Amar7605]

I really needed a good laugh today… thank you so much, Mover 🙏🏽

[@weien_024]

"physics don't apply" 🙃 it's always hilarious

[@aaronlopez3585]

Mover you crack me up, I could just imagine if you were in charge of military aviation authenticity scenes in movies the average film credits would be ten times longer than the actual films 14 sec clip. 🤣

[@TacticalEd]

The Soviet Yak38, the "Forger" had a VTOL system very close to that found on the F35 and also featured an auto-eject mode that automatically punched out the pilot in case the aircraft rolled too hard in VTOL mode. The legend says pilots were also randomly ejected as the system was not 100% reliable!

[@Foodencio]

Yes, that is true! "And also during the 90s the Soviet Union was finishing its own economic and political disaster, and the resulting that swept across the Russian military created a mountain of problems for Yakovlev to overcome. Luckily for Yakovlev, America’s favorite plucky multi-billion dollar defense contractor raced in to save the day. As the Iron Curtain receded across Europe, defense giant Lockheed Martin started to pour money into Yak-141 program in order to glean some sweet, sweet former Soviet engineering secrets. The two companies allegedly signed an agreement in 1991 (but not revealed until 1995) that outlined funding for additional Yak-141 prototypes, including a plan to fly the remaining operational prototype the Farnborough Airshow in September 1992. While Lockheed most likely had zero intention of helping produce the Yak-141 for export; it would make more sense that the entire contract was a cover for procuring testing data on the Yak-141 program, including most importantly any VTOL data obtained through years of testing and development."

[@mitri5389]

the Yak-38 also had a automatic ejection system and a auto landing in vtol mode, the yak 41 most likely had the same feature too.

[@gelucarausu]

I enjoyed somewhat your comments, they made sense to me, some looked a bit stretched, I have to research, but your eyes have no lie in them, I guess they cut some corners in movies, cause is a movie, but you know. I'm glad at least 1 person has a head on the shoulders. Thank you for your service sir.

[@scpguy1381]

I was physically pained by this scene when I watched it

[@pepper3732]

Thank you brother mover I can't speak for haters cuz haters going to be haters I wish you would do more of these reactions I appreciate it and I will say thank you for your expertise keep up the good work peace out

[@Heatsreef]

This Madlad of a pilot just pulled of an autorotation with a jet.

[@-nixwite-]

F-35 Names: 1. Lightning II 2. Obese Amelia 3. Fat Amy 4. Battle Penguin 5. Trash Can Lid (B Model's) What else could there be? Also, I think Mover lost it at 11:18

[@terifarley4770]

"We have the F-35B, Gawd, the worst one!" LOL to funny, love me some A model Fat Amy tho!!!!

[@Sitti2300]

Maybe physics is wrong. Movie and anime have shown me that physics is overrated.

[@news_internationale2035]

Cute cat.

[@dotofdeath]

One more for you! The F-35 can't fire AIM-9 (any version) missiles from the internal bays, either - AIM-9 ignites its rocket motor while still on the rail, as opposed to the AIM-120 which ignites after being dropped. Even if we suspend disbelief and allow for the pilot to fire a 9X in LOAL mode using his fancy helmet mounted cueing, having the missile ignite on rail in the internal bay would be quite undesirable. It's why the F-22 has those sidearm rails canted outward.

[@tpochep]

That's an interesting fact about automatic ejection! I remember another jet that had it - also was VTOL, YAK-38, Soviet/Russian, allegedly so difficult and dangerous machine, that it was also auto-detecting when to eject its pilot (given the pilot probably has not realized he has to eject right now) :D

[@Black_Sheep_0213]

Been waiting for a while for this one!

[@herosjourney8725]

Mover, avengers 1 has two f-35 scenes. One during helicarrier attack and another during the final battle. Could you please react to them.

[@Acejak1234]

theres not much to say to those, one is just the f-35s taking off then the second is one launching a nuke, though he would probably get a kick out of seeing nick fury shoot down one with a missile launcher, lol

[@herosjourney8725]

@@Acejak1234 the takeoff scene was when the f-35 hovers near the helicarrier and then shoots hulk. Just like this movie there are two guns and in wrong spots. The nuke scene however is when the f-35 also launches it.

[@Acejak1234]

@@herosjourney8725 oh right forgot about the shooting hulk part, "TARGET ANGRY TARGET ANGRY!" lol

[@Acejak1234]

@@GhostWatcher2024 lol good one

[@herosjourney8725]

@@GhostWatcher2024 hahahahaha

[@MikeLeFish]

This scene had me laughing so hard when I first saw it (even before I joined up). Right at the outset, I had to ask "Since when do Air Traffic issue engagement orders?" And the notion that any competent pilot would choose to go nose-to-nose with a truck down at ground level, underneath structures (setting aircraft capabilities aside) was beyond laughable. Chuckled at your comment about the need to develop the STOVL capable version so we Brits could have it... That's the Navy and their little tubby-toy carrier, it's kind of cute. :P Edit to add: am I right in recalling some Russian carrier-capable aircraft having an auto-eject mechanism that punches the pilot out if it detects below a certain altitude with no weight on wheels? I think the idea was on ski-jump carriers, it was a safety mechanism in case the aircraft failed to lift, but caused problems when pilots forgot to disable it before landing! Not sure if that's reality or something I got from a novel! 😂

[@HollywoodMarine0351]

“Flight Of The Intruder” You and Gonky, since he has carrier landing experience, should be your next movie review.

[@0300SSgtOrange]

^This!^ ☝️

[@CapStar362]

@@0300SSgtOrange NO! FoTI was well written, quite possibly one of if not the MOST realistically written and portrayed movies concerning Naval Aviation and Aviation in Vietnam period. Mover himself has already said he is not rated for the A-6 in any capacity and would have to spend way to much time to invest into researching the A-6 to make any effort to put FoTI on this channel

[@CapStar362]

No, and Mover has already repeatedly denied making any effort to even take on FoTI and has said that is one of the more properly presented and realistically written portrayals of Vietnam Era Naval Aviation. that on top of, he does not know anyone who is rated on the A-6

[@fatal_bull]

Funnily enough recently, I was just thinking, it's not always, Mover Ruins and today's Ep, you decide to change it 👏👏👏

[@Apyr404]

Yak 38 and su 33 also have a automatic mode for the ejection seat the yak if the lift jets fail and the su 33 on take off if it sinks below a certain height after leaving the ski ramp on russian cvs, also yes this has happened where a pilot has forgot to turn off the auto mode and tried to land

[@the_spanner_ch7mp]

😂 😂 😂 Love your reactions to the crazy scenes

[@Stormskip]

I learned a lot about the F-35B today. Thanks Mover!

[@dealerofburningsalt3649]

Love your videos, thank you for time and effort. Not that it really matters, Yak-38 also had an automatic eject.

[@nauuwgtx]

That 35 hovering like a pro though

[@firstnameherelastnamehere8814]

It's called casual mode, bro you get124 missiles, cannon restocks every minute and it has ground impact forgiveness. You can pull 16 +gs and accelerate faster then a rocket

[@lyndonjohnson9082]

New name: Mover Mercilessly Mocks Moronic Military Movie Moments

[@jonevers6448]

I looked at some newer "Mover Ruins Movies" to see if you actually did change the name. I think you made the right choice keeping with "Ruins" as that, to me, is part of the fun of watching these.

[@johnmaddox447]

You're reactions are what made me laugh the most😆 Very funny!😆

[@CrazyGreek80]

07:19 LMAO!! I know nothing about fighter jets, but the reaction puts me in tears!!!

[@Void304]

It's like Hollywood continually forgets that helicopters exist, and that they can also carry weapons.

[@thechamp8162]

To slow and wouldn’t you rather watch a jet than a heli and don’t just say no to be funny

[@Void304]

@@thechamp8162 "No." - Me officially not being funny

[@FirstDagger]

@@thechamp8162 ; "Too slow" makes fast mover hover and make target out of themselves, silly Hollywood. Airwolf, Blue Thunder, Rambo and Fire Birds disagree on helis being boring.

[@NoblelllB]

i would much prefer an apache rip a truck apart with its 30mm or hellfires than an F-35B do everything totally wrong

[@driftertank]

Let's be honest, the only reason "Body-Positivity Amelia" appeared in this movie was new-toy effect...

[@FR-ek8lj]

Call it "When Mover gets pickled by movies"

[@DavidWilliams-nq6fj]

Keep the name. I love “Mover Ruins Movies”

[@akfreed6949]

When the next-gen fighters finally arrived at the military base in Anchorage Alaska I met a military jet mechanic at a gas station one morning . I asked him what the new jets were like and he gave me a DIRTY look and said they were junk . This is when the jets had some serious problems with the air circulation system failing causing lethal crashes .

[@andrewhickinbottom1051]

Ahaha - I love this series! Always interesting hearing your comparisons to how Hollywood do things. PS - just a bit of advice, if its your active window, you can pause and unpause youtube with the space bar. Might be easier for you, and means less mouse cursors on the screen capture. Left and right on the arrow keys skips back and forth, and shift and < or > change the playback speed - useful for slow motion!

[@CWLemoine]

I'm aware. I choose to do it this way. 👍

[@andrewhickinbottom1051]

@@CWLemoine Ok - no worries!