道家的基本精神，陶國璋《哲人絮語》79

Рет қаралды 9,915

5 ай бұрын

趙氏曾任教於美國Bryant University 、北京理工大學珠海學院、深圳大學、香港樹仁大學、臺灣中央研究院近史所，歷任客座教授、副教授、研究員、助理教授、高級訪問學者；現任國立中山大學臺港研究中心研究員（兼任）。
2018年獲中國經濟思想史優秀（一等）著作獎，研究題目包括經濟思想、經濟史、政治經濟學，出版著作二十一部，論文三十餘篇。英國權威出版社 Routledge給予 "中國和西方頂尖學者（leading Chinese and Western scholar）" 的評價。
《趙氏讀書生活》，一個歷史學者的平台，分享學術、社會、政治經濟觀察，請以每月5元美元獲取收費平台Patreon的參考資料、獨家專欄、史學和哲學短講分享：
/ chiusreading
或於KZbin 上按加入成為會員，可獲影片的參考資料
/ @gctalk
/ drgavinchiu
PayPal.me/chiusreading
工作洽談：higavinchiu@gmail.com
Wise開戶連結：wise.com/invite/u/sinc262
virgin 上網連結：aklam.io/lRJws0
octopus電媒連結：share.octopus.energy/straw-li...
Gavin Sin Hin Chiu (趙善軒) is a well-known academic with expertise in the areas of economic thought, economic history, and political economy. He has taught at several universities, including Bryant University in the United States, the Zhuhai College of Beijing Institute of Technology, Shenzhen University, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, and the Institute of Modern History at the Taiwan Central Research Institute. He has also served as a visiting professor, associate professor, researcher, assistant professor, and senior visiting scholar.
In 2018, Dr. Chiu was awarded the first-class award for outstanding works in the history of Chinese economic thought. He has published twenty-one books and more than thirty papers, and the UK's authoritative publisher, Routledge, has evaluated him as a "leading Chinese and Western scholar."
In his book, "The Political Economy of the Han Dynasty and Its Legacy," Dr. Chiu and co-author S.C. Kwan examine monetary thought in the Han Dynasty and Three Kingdoms period (220-280 BCE). In the article, "The 'Cold War' between Ho Ping Ti and Academia Sinica. The Changing Political Identity of the Overseas Chinese," Dr. Chiu examines the political and intellectual conflict between Professor Ho Ping Ti and Academia Sinica during the period of 1967-1990.
Dr. Chiu is also the co-author of "The Income of the Customs during Late Ming and Early Qing," a book review of the "Note of the Customs Duties in the Qing Dynasty, 1644-1911," and the editor of "Search from the Beginning: The Intellectual Thought and Education in pre-Qin and Qin-Han Dynasties."

Пікірлер: 32

@kkkam6987 5 ай бұрын

陶老師早晨，大家早晨，多謝陶老師分享，多謝！多謝！

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

謝謝您的支持！

@MingYoutube 5 ай бұрын

赵博好陶教授好

@user-oq8lh3il3x 5 ай бұрын

陶教授:听你一席话感受特深，觉得要一定年纪才明白“道”的道理，道有道的深刻智慧。感恩！

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

謝謝您的支持！

@kamminglyung9264 5 ай бұрын

謝謝分享

@winniecheung7284 5 ай бұрын

聽後很有現在感覺，例如損之損好像現在講是断捨離，陶老師講解👍thanks

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

謝謝您的支持！

@yancoffee1075 5 ай бұрын

雖然好難明白, 因為基本功不夠.但好有意思. 尤其是開始講儒家思想引伸出來的問題. 我真心覺得好有意思. 真的現在好多人同你講道德. 孝道.要做一個為國為乜的思想. 實在是"虛偽" ,以打正道德變成歪理. 1分證據說8分事理.

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

謝謝您的支持！

@user-gn5bt9pw4g 5 ай бұрын

道家想法超時代已想到有世界之前相信係無似有時空無限想法想到人之渺小奉勸世人不應自我中心用教化希望世界和平老子是仁人君子

@roberthui3731 5 ай бұрын

陶教授好，多謝分享。這段內容真的十分龐大。基本上同意道家不完全反對儒家並可以說某情度上成全儒家此觀點。個人認為先秦儒家對道之論述是工夫境界論進路，故以德為其內容而德乃從知能而言。亦即是說道並不是飄渺空虛之物或境界。而工夫境界之源頭在心，這在【尚書】所謂“虞廷十六字”已見端倪。其中指點出人心與道心兩者，問題是先秦並無所謂知識論故此知識與智慧之分並不明確。這就導致慾（生理性）與欲（心靈性）相混淆而產生討論困難。此情況要到明末劉蕺山對理學與心學批判才有儒家之知識論的著墨。簡單地說道家並不，也不可能反對知識之增長而是更鼓勵這增長不是暴漲式的擾亂當中的智慧獲得。所以提出為學日益而為道日損之方也是“同”而不是分別的手段。祝安。

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

謝謝您的支持！有深見地

@chenchen8065 5 ай бұрын

玫瑰🌹🌹🌹

@jolenetsang1802 5 ай бұрын

👍

@pakkinlaw4721 4 ай бұрын

❗詩名:「天地哲理詩話通！」 ( 詩是以`粵語'押韻的！) 一首宗教與哲學意味的詩！ 😑 🙏 活著無奈笑一笑，自古人類已學曉，人生苦樂一齣戲，做給天看指令調！順其天道見美意，逆其天道苦夢飄，神是主導策劃者，為其己利說`我要'！。苦悶無見歡欣意，無為有為天地鳥，創造人類建友伴，俯伏崇拜佢意囂。此是一切天地理，毋說宗教百句繞，看真言真一理道，就是要你伴無聊！ ( 9-1-2024 11:33pm「迎風」在晚後又去麵店吃完青菜後，踱步回家時寫出這首「天地哲理詩話通！」的詩！) 😔 😑 ❗當你了解 `神的無聊' ，你就會知: 天地的一切道理、宗教、所謂`救恩'、愛、善、惡，等一切一切！

@user-rw6xr9kf8o 5 ай бұрын

我看过很多西方的哲学书，经常引用中国的"庄周梦蝶"，来凑合西方哲学里的"怀疑论"，"世界模拟论"，"间接感知论"等(我不肯定他们经常这样引用，算不算正确)。到底意识是"直接感知"?或"间接感知? 在西方哲学里，一直争论不休。我觉得"间接感知论"比较可信，而且可以用逻辑加实例推导出来。假如"间接感知论"是真的话，那么这会加强某版本的"心物两元论"，和"世界模拟论"的可信性（"心物两元论"有多个版本，彼此之间有差别）。

@taokwokcheung8714 5 ай бұрын

有見地