I loved DSL. Back in the day I used it when my hard drive suddenly died on my old Pentium PC. The live DSL environment allowed me to continue working from floppy without an issue.
@RandyHanley7 ай бұрын
So true! I loved using it as a recovery setup for when Windows computers wouldn't boot.
@Shard1137 ай бұрын
I love this, specifically distros that enable netbooks from the early 2010s to still function properly.
@RandyHanley7 ай бұрын
Great point!
@oldforestroad4 ай бұрын
Man, I am stoked to have found this channel. Thanks for your videos, they are excellent. I have not heard the words "Sylpheed" and "XMMS" in a long time...loved those programs.
@RandyHanley4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much and I am very grateful to hear that. I appreciate you checking out my channel.
@pazu87287 ай бұрын
Wow, I played around with it back pre 2010 days because of it size 50M. Glad to know that DSL is back. Can fit it on a 100M pen drive or run live on a CD
@bombasticiti4 ай бұрын
Nice
@RandyHanley4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@appsdecasaАй бұрын
How to put the icons and texts bigger?
@nageswaraopatha54457 ай бұрын
Keep doing this kind of light weight Linux os ❤
@johndroyson79216 ай бұрын
Wow. This is really cool. I might have to fire up a vm with it soon.
@PySnek2 ай бұрын
So why the hell does arch or artix use more than 120MB of RAM even without a GUI or any other bloat but this distro with a GUI idles around 110 MB? Even a tiling WM like i3 or sway alone needs more than 200MB of RAM. I just don't get it.
@RandyHanley2 ай бұрын
That is a great question. I don’t think I will ever fully-understand where RAM is being allocated. Sorry, but I don’t know.
@PySnek2 ай бұрын
@@RandyHanley Ok I searched a bit about this topic and it looks like the old kernel that DSL is using (2.4.31) from 2016 uses waaay less RAM than modern 4/5.x lts and 6.x kernels. Another point is their init system (BusyBox). It's very leightweight in comparison to OpenRC, systemd, dinit or runit.
@RandyHanley2 ай бұрын
@@PySnek nice work. This is very good to know.
@BobSockTwo6 ай бұрын
But what's the difference between it and puppy linux? They really look Just the same. Please tell me
@RandyHanley6 ай бұрын
@@BobSockTwo that’s a really good question. Puppy Linux just seems very unique in the way it’s designed. That’s all I can really say. It doesn’t feel like any other distribution.
@alwanrosyidi27722 ай бұрын
why do browsers use so many ram today?
@RandyHanley2 ай бұрын
I think it depends on the website but yes browsers do definitely use a lot of RAM for each tab open. At least 50 MB on average.