I would be so very into a chapter by chapter discussion of these texts in this mode. In the last couple of days, I have looked all over for discussions of individual chapters of the Zhuangzi, and found that some chapters, like Butcher Ding, are talked about a lot, while others, such as the discussion at the beginning of chapter two, about the wind/sounds of man, earth and heaven have seemingly very little available. Everyone just wants to sell you a book.
@joshuavanderplaats6 ай бұрын
As a former Greek Orthodox priest and a student of apophasis in that tradition, this was a wonderful superb video. One cannot read the Tao Te Ching and not wonder if these words did not touch that other master in the Levant.
@schwartztronica2 жыл бұрын
Incredible stuff, guys. I wonder whether a kind of theodicy could be developed from the Daodejing, in the sense of explaining why humanity continues to descend into violence. The "natural" or "base" state of people is to name things, in part because we care about things, we grow attached to them, while detaching from names is a state that needs to be mastered (and moreover, detachment is easier to achieve at the individual level than at the collective level). So, there is always a kind of resistance to detachment. Another thought. Paradoxically, self-mastery requires action to become, if you will, "de-active": you need to train yourself to think daoistically. That means some part of you resists the training, like a block of wood could be said to resist being carved into something beautiful, even though ironically, it is the carving of the wood that is compared to naming... EDIT: By the way, I've just visited your blog. Your intellectual exercise there is not only valuable, but you are building quite a resource for people like me! (I'm earning a PhD in philosophy.)
@lambdacalculus35053 жыл бұрын
Love these vids. :) Glad to see someone actually studying Daoism instead of fetishizing its Eastern aspects
@abmarnie92 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@HxH2011DRA3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that this video helped me put together that daoism, like all mysticism, is impractical and a waste of time~
@qjin49643 жыл бұрын
ten thousand immortal sages are laughing at you
@HxH2011DRA3 жыл бұрын
@@qjin4964 I'm glad I could spark such joy
@DokiDokiDoku3 жыл бұрын
Philosophy like this is subjective in its usefulness. If you didn't find use and others did, then that's fine. It needs mentioning that *of course* it's impractical for the modern era. Historically chinese philosophy like this was used politically and socially before spirituality was concerned. They're remarkable because of the instances of applicability to modern times, not because that was the intention while it was written