That is the real call lol that’s the real Roosevelt
@yawgmoth65685 жыл бұрын
@@Marcus51090 David Strathairn provides the voice
@groundfx93335 жыл бұрын
Christian van Laak oh so thats what they teach people in Germany
@Eri765 жыл бұрын
@Christian van Laak I'm sorry, who started the war, beg your pardon? On the 1st of September, I mean. That's when the war started.
@lukaszpokoju6 жыл бұрын
Winston Churchill experiencing customer care tribulations before the ages.
@Adam-vo6tv6 жыл бұрын
"We're sorry, but there's nothing we can do. Now let me transfer you to our transfer department."
@declanroberts89345 жыл бұрын
You should his phone call with the British Raj.
@jimmy2k4o5 жыл бұрын
Christian van Laak and where exactly do you come from. War started because there’s something rotten in Germany’s spirit, and we had to smack them down for a second time in 40 years. Only thing Germany is useful for is trying to sink Europe with your war guilt.
@Pliam9614 жыл бұрын
@Christian van Laak We didn't invade Austria, Germany did. We didn't invade Czechoslovakia, Germany did. We didn't invade Poland, Germany did. We didn't invade the Benelux countries, Germany did. We didn't invade France, Germany did. We didn't murder 11 million people because of their race, ideology or orientation, Germany did. We didn't set up a dictatorship that killed people because people disagreed, Germany did. Hitler wanted an alliance with the British, it's there in Mein Kampf. The only country Hitler had respect for besides Germany was Great Britain, but Britain didn't take the easy way out. Britain could've very well still remained an enormous global power, but no. Unlike Germany, Britain stood on principle, and sacrificed its position as the world's pre-eminent power just so you could spout your utterly useless bullshit.
@bondvillain6784 жыл бұрын
@@Pliam961 i dont see a point in arguing with you but let me put the fact that britain colonized half the world and turned it into dark ages thats alot more horrible than what germany "did"
@PlagueDemon66 жыл бұрын
"You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing.. After they've tried everything else" - Sir Winston Churchill
@chefception29286 жыл бұрын
Plague Demon correct
@mynamejeff7856 жыл бұрын
@@aland317 The Germans were the Aggressors, they started the fight and we finished it
@aland3176 жыл бұрын
@@mynamejeff785 ...and "we" finished it ?....yes after the US got invloved, and Monty and crew figured out they now had an unending supply of equipment and men, it was easy to sacrifice American GI'S under incompetent British command....and BTW it is called a "World War" for a reason. Yet the RN and RA were no where in sight in the Pacific...!
@Malos_6 жыл бұрын
@@aland317 *Appeasement*
@toja33336 жыл бұрын
Plague Demon I think there should be statue of Churchill Roosevelt Hitler and Stalin holding hands together as nice family they were
@8ballyt9956 жыл бұрын
"In more ways than you can possibly know" That line really hurts
@scootergrant86834 жыл бұрын
The fact that being too late applies in so many facets.
@sethbangard51943 жыл бұрын
The whole scene is just so sad with his wavering voice and the hopeless look in his eyes as he hears he’s basically alone and his allies aren’t that concerned for his nation or citizens
@stanleyzu79143 жыл бұрын
It's a great line bc america has been untouchable
@stevebobmcjocksock40213 жыл бұрын
@@stanleyzu7914 That doesn't make sense
@_Tristen_3 жыл бұрын
@@stevebobmcjocksock4021 im assuming he means at the time, and still now, America has truly had no idea what it means to be on the brink of utter defeat.
@charliehowes76246 жыл бұрын
Just imagine the amount of stress that Churchill faced for the few years that Britain and its empire stood alone.
@soyusmaximus71765 жыл бұрын
Just one, actually. British troops forced off the continent in June 1940, Hitler attacks Russia in June 1941.
@sausagejockyGaming5 жыл бұрын
@@soyusmaximus7176 Britain was fighting alone in North africa, asia and europe for a year where every other country wouldve surrendered, just look at the blitz, our home nation and mainly capital bombed every day and night for literal years with no pausing, but we didnt surrender other countries (france) had the thought of being bombed and surrendered.
@joshuagrover7954 жыл бұрын
The only barrier that saved Britain from invasion in 1940 was the English Channel.
@sirdouglashaig9674 жыл бұрын
@@joshuagrover795 And the Royal Navy
@bondvillain6784 жыл бұрын
Germany was fighting alone as well
@brynmormeredith62703 жыл бұрын
The old-fashioned, long-distance telephone line was an equally engaging character in this scene. Love all those eerie, desolate whistling sounds and the tinnitus-like high notes coming and going like spectres; and the almost industrial clicks, hums and chopping noises as Churchill and Roosevelt conversed.
@MathasarSalazar23 жыл бұрын
I 1,000% agree with this. It was sooo eerie and made it a completely different atmosphere to show that they are really alone... I wonder if FDR and Churchill had better conversations than this, later.
@20PhantoM072 жыл бұрын
I saw a show once that mentioned a secure line Churchill had with Roosevelt, it had an encryption device called the Green Hornet and nobody could listen in on it, thought i can’t find any more videos on the subject.
@Anygodwilldo2 жыл бұрын
Zoom meetings nowadays haven't improved much😀
@richardhall98152 жыл бұрын
Back in the days before transatlantic telephone lines - all trans-ocean calls had to be carried over the airwaves, making them susceptible to atmospheric distortion and interference.
@chrisnasif41562 жыл бұрын
Really amplifies how far separated Britain was from her last standing ally. As if calling desperately for help from deep space, knowing your only hope is all but out of reach.
@kidpeligro78786 жыл бұрын
When I watched this scene the 1st time, I felt really bad for Churchill. His facial expressions and voice as if he is on the verge of tears conveyed a sense of desperation. Even though we all know Allies and Britain won the war, you still felt the general feeling of helplessness and urgency to do something.
@lewistaylor28585 жыл бұрын
don't feel sorry for Churchill, he wanted this.
@stevencassidy69825 жыл бұрын
while the Americans sat on their hands
@Mason-zp8yb5 жыл бұрын
@@stevencassidy6982 Not our problem, funny how people hate America until they need us to bail them out of a war.
@Tsunami09504 жыл бұрын
@Anatoly Dyatlov I love how you refuse to take into account the thousands of global issues that have occured because of European colonization. Many countries in Africa are in turmoil because of border conflicts, all created by the Europeans.
@alexbrown69224 жыл бұрын
@J M or maybe Hoover was told about it by British spies and did nothing with the information. But I guess then an American would be to blame and that simply won't do!
@freebird2646 жыл бұрын
"But we payed for them, we payed for them with the money that we... that we borrowed from you." - Every American and British economical debate since WW1.
@janehrahan51165 жыл бұрын
@Berb Merley he said since ww1...
@danielwoodruffe29385 жыл бұрын
Free Bird Britain repaid its war loans (with interest), unlike the scores of fascist juntas and tinpot dictators the US propped up over the decades ??
@Thorny57185 жыл бұрын
Britain never borrowed in WW1 , the money from the huge empire was not massively effected then. Very small amounts. Every penny that was borrowed by Great Britain was paid back, with INTEREST! The first part of the war 39’ to late 40’ was a real tough time for us, we was alone, and having to fight the Italians too. It is good how it captures Winstons desperation in those early days, so much equipment was lost in the defence of France and the retreat to Dunkirk. The USA was the obvious choice, sat 1000’s of miles away and untouched by any trouble. Plus there has always been a special bond. Britain never recovered from WW2, hence the collapse of the Empire 50’s - 70’s. Through out the war we was sending supplies to the USSR whilst we was still borrowing ourselves! We piled countless amounts of money and aid into Europe post war to help get it back on its feet, including Germany. People forget this country gave so much, we was still on rationing into the 1950’s!! That’s how much the war affected us.
@landochabod75 жыл бұрын
I know it sounds funny, but it's perfectly normal. I read the American Revolution was supplied, I'm not sure whether as a loan or a gift, by the French, and John Adams secured a loan from the Dutch as well. Clearly, as long as you loan money to someone to buy something, you have an interest in being the one who's selling that thing as well: more business for your companies and more jobs for your people. Of course, you might end up losing money, but that's true of any loan.
@Richtofenfan5 жыл бұрын
No you fools the German kid for some reason swung at the Russian kid at some point whilst both the American and the British kid watched and laughed in amusement as he screamed “Vodka is better than Schnapps!”
@Brokenlikefour6 жыл бұрын
I think David really nailed the Roosevelt voice!
@imcintyre016 жыл бұрын
(Virginian) Mostly on spot, but was a bit off in a couple of places.
@LittleB20076 жыл бұрын
I think it was not so much the speeches and yelling scenes as the quiet ones like this that won Oldman the Oscar. Here he expresses all sorts of subtle emotions for two and a half minutes in one uninterrupted closeup shot. It's even more impressive when you consider the heavy prosthetics he had to act through. Just amazing
@Carphil076 жыл бұрын
Agreed, this was my favorite scene of the movie. two of the most powerful men in the world casually talking about lending some planes which may be the key to preventing the collapse of civilization
@antonioacevedo52002 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? this is actual footage. No way mortal actors could replicate this.
@hansostlund4626 Жыл бұрын
mr Avecado youre right🎉🎉😂😂
@cosmicwisp95956 жыл бұрын
"Got me there I can't swing it, no planes" "But we payed for them with the money that we borrowed from you."
@jb764896 жыл бұрын
RedGen Gaming kinda like how in ww1, Britain just stole a dreadnought they built for turkey
@KingGhidorah7776 жыл бұрын
jb76489 Turkey didn't exist in WW1. It was the filthy Ottoman Empire
@jb764896 жыл бұрын
TheDalekslayer saying turkey in reference to the Ottoman Empire is a colloquialism
@UKOGBN6 жыл бұрын
It was 2 ships , Sultan Osman and Reşadiye . That also dosen't include another first class battleship, two scouts, four torpedo boat destroyers, two twin screw submarine boats and a floating dock they lost after they sided with Germany. But they did receive 48 million in sterling worth of munitions.
@UKOGBN6 жыл бұрын
That's misleading,The Neutrality Act of 1939 allowed states at war to buy arms from the US . so that scene in the movie has been embellished . It wasn't money we borrowed from the US at all for the very simple fact The Johnson Act of 1934 prohibited credit loans to any nation with owed debt to the US, that included Britain who still owed the US for loans from the 1st WW. This movie is set in June it was 6 months later the Lend Lease Act came into effect in December. Until December Britain paid in hard cash for all arms it brought from the US including those planes.
@superwhiterice86404 жыл бұрын
Went to London a couple years ago, and walking through the actual bunker and getting to see the exact room and telephone this conversation was taken on, had me awestruck.
@gabomur2 жыл бұрын
Where is that
@hockey1freak2 жыл бұрын
@@gabomur Churchill War Rooms
@skyboy43416 жыл бұрын
ITS OKAY GUYS IN HEARTS OF IRONS 4 I SUPPLIED THE BRITISH WITH LOTS OF STUFF
@militarian97596 жыл бұрын
Until they spam your screen with call to arms and invite to faction lol 😂
@theninkyn0nk4636 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your contribution. I salute you sir.
@dog8116 жыл бұрын
Not the hero we deserve but the one we needed
@Delogros6 жыл бұрын
I just got Sweden to join the allies when I was playing Canada, massively reinforced Malmo with 11 infantry, 4 armoured and 4 mechanized divisions and it took so many of the German resources to try and take it that they never broke the French, WW2 won by early 41 muhahaha.
@skyboy43416 жыл бұрын
@@Delogros i played as us once and staged a coup in italy to distract the italians and pushed through Sicily
@kinostrong67246 жыл бұрын
That Roosevelt voice over on point.
@paulinotou6 жыл бұрын
"I guess you could push them, the damn thing has wheels" lol what a wise ass.
@hd74xlhs6 жыл бұрын
the calmness of Churchill while talking with Roosevelt is amazing... I would find it highly unlikely I could remain the same while asking an ally for assistance knowing my country is in dire straits. this is just one part of an overall excellent movie!
@Fedaykin246 жыл бұрын
The United States of America at that time was not an ally, they were firmly neutral as far as domestic American politics was concerned. Roosevelt was pushing the very edge of what he was able to get away with at the time with what support he was able to offer to the United Kingdom. Until the 1940 Congressional elections which shifted American political sentiment in support of the UK he had little room to manoeuvre. Churchill being calm or not was not a particular factor in this situation, the UK was begging help from an isolationist US.
@mrlips15686 жыл бұрын
not just the country, possibly the world
@kailashpatel17066 жыл бұрын
I watched this with cold fury...it shows you the myth of the UK-US special relationship...if its historically accurate...its an outrage..
@bobpage65975 жыл бұрын
@@kailashpatel1706 Don't allow the actions of politicians to cloud your view. When British & American troops are on the ground, chewing the same dirt together.......there is no stronger bond between brothers!
@kailashpatel17065 жыл бұрын
Not true. Plenty of evidence the British forces disliked the way the Americans behaved in Iraq at the Special forces level..
@daredemontriple63 жыл бұрын
The most hurtful part of this scene is knowing just how well Roosevelt knew the situation and just how much he wanted to help. But he had to play the political game, the American people did not want to go to war and what was happening in Europe was none of their concern. For years Roosevelt deliberately 'misread that particular treaty' and 'forgot about that specific ruling' and such to put as much support through to the UK as he could. Constantly finding loopholes and bending the rules to give aid whee possible. Until finally, with Pearl Harbour, he had a silver bullet. Now nothing could stand in his way and at last he could throw the 'power and might' as Churchill put it, of the new world behind the rest of the allies!
@jay-18002 жыл бұрын
The most interesting part is after Pearl Harbor Churchill actually pretty much invited himself to Washington. FDR didn’t even find out he was coming until he was almost there. He stayed for almost a month and become bros while drinking and making plans for the war.
@sam939312 жыл бұрын
Fascinating isn't it!
@annaisabelle69202 жыл бұрын
Personally, FDR was a man of component because every piece of his agenda (ranging from the "New Deal" to the legalized detainment of Japanese-American families) suffices what every man, woman and child in America during the 1930s and early 40s eventually went through (regardless of white, black, Latino or Asian).
@Bitchslapper3162 жыл бұрын
The most amusing part about this is that pearl harbor wouldn't have gotten the U.S involved in the European war, Germany didn't attack pearl harbor. After the attack Hitler decided to declare war on the U.S first. As historian Mark Felton puts it "In a colossal act of stupidly Hitler declared war on the united states"
@annaisabelle69202 жыл бұрын
@@Bitchslapper316 Hm...
@edvinparmeza12983 жыл бұрын
F.D.R: "It must be late there" W. Ch: "In more ways that you could possibly know" That's eerily deep
@fearferocity19476 жыл бұрын
"But we payed for them with the money that we borrowed from you." lol....
@militarian97596 жыл бұрын
War plan red in a nutshell
@UKOGBN6 жыл бұрын
That scene is a load of made up rubbish, presumably put in to try and push home the dire situation Churchill was in , Britain did not borrow cash from the US until December with Lend Lease , this movie is set in June....
@imcintyre016 жыл бұрын
Ukogbn W for the land lease yes, but (including in WW1) this arrangement has often been the status quo between America and the European allies.
@nanyafahkinbiznes13526 жыл бұрын
America lent money to most European countries involved in the war to rebuild the damages which also lead to the Fall of WS.
@wolfder66616 жыл бұрын
TheClassofLefkowitzChannel and now where the best of friends then again I mean we could have befriended the soviets if war plan red happen
@pwgearedturbofan23485 жыл бұрын
I really loved this scene. It added to the dire nature of the situation and illustrated Churchill's isolation, fear, and helplessness. Even your ally and friend can't/won't help you out in a catastrophically dangerous situation.
@dannyhernandez22032 жыл бұрын
Perhaps it was the bottle of brandy Mr Churchill had for breakfast every morning.
@ohno65282 жыл бұрын
@@dannyhernandez2203 what?
@JohnJohn-pe5kr Жыл бұрын
@@ohno6528I went to Churchill’s war room and the guide said that Winston drank constantly.
@randomamerican50654 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt always wanted to help the British but congress wouldn’t allow him to provide any military aid. Pearl Harbor was just what Roosevelt needed to get Congress to allow him to help the British
@UKOGBN4 жыл бұрын
Actually he did help both the UK and France with the provision of the ''Cash n Carry'' legislation amendment added to the 1937 Neutrality Act, The US could export arms to the UK and France so long as they did not travel on US ships to those nations.
@sarcharasticperson4423 жыл бұрын
@@UKOGBN Also in the 1940 there was a destroyers for bases deal that provided 50 destroyers for Britain for british bases in the atlantic and pacific.
@osamabinladen8243 жыл бұрын
Why
@jamieholtsclaw23053 жыл бұрын
Yes. That's true. FDR himself would have sent everything he could (and later did). The scene is meant to show how feeble American help was right when Britain needed it most.
@elstevobevo3 жыл бұрын
Also, J. p . Kennedy hated Churchill and he was the go between.
@jacobeyres87784 жыл бұрын
As the saying goes: The war was won by American Steel, Soviet Blood and British Intelligence
@hamzamahmood95653 жыл бұрын
Took 3 to match one: Hate
@mahfudmahmuddin31613 жыл бұрын
And french white flags all around its borders
@dunneincrewgear3 жыл бұрын
British intelligence? Isn't that an oxymoron?
@gewalfofwoofia82633 жыл бұрын
They all bullied Germany in the first World War. So the irony of them being on the receiving end in the second, well...
@tap11483 жыл бұрын
@@dunneincrewgear Isaac Newton
@SortOfABigDeal6 жыл бұрын
“Horses? Did you say horses?” “Well you could just push it, the thing has wheels, you know.” Savage.
@jjrj85684 жыл бұрын
"Up to you"
@DeckardCain19864 жыл бұрын
Was it really an option Roosevelt was giving to Winston? Or was he joking?
@SuzutakeJP4 жыл бұрын
Deckard Cain No, he was genuinely suggesting that, because of the American Neutrality act I don’t think they can just pick them up
@echo44284 жыл бұрын
@@DeckardCain1986 no it was real. And the UK did do it.
@Kardamitiano4 жыл бұрын
@@DeckardCain1986 Someone correct me if I'm wrong but there were horse towed artillery in WW2. So quite possible he wasn't joking.
@SwatChief4 жыл бұрын
This is in my opinion the best scene in this film. It does an incredible job of capturing in one scene the pressure, frustration, and desperation that Churchill is feeling at this time in the war.
@Dumpstermuffin13 жыл бұрын
Pull the planes across the border with horses...Roosevelt trying to find a loophole on the neutrality law
@seanjohn23123 жыл бұрын
Atleast he was trying to help.
@yatsumleung8618 Жыл бұрын
There IS a loophole. Hence they built many airfield with runways spanning across the border. The planes would land on the US side and can either taxi or pushed over to the Canadian side for delivery.
@strada21_8 ай бұрын
@@yatsumleung8618👍🏼
@GeneralGouda3 жыл бұрын
I felt bad for Churchill in this scene, he was really counting on help from the US. Unfortunately at the time, Congress really wanted no part of the war. FDR and Churchill had an amazing relationship, they understood each other which really paved the way for them destroying the third reich in ‘45.
@KingandServant6 жыл бұрын
The acting at 1:43... voice and facial expression are out of this world
@dustinplatt68824 жыл бұрын
UK: We need armaments. US: _sigh_ this new treaty has our balls UK: 😥 _Pearl Harbor_ UK: 😀
@softdrink-04 жыл бұрын
After Pearl Harbor public support to intervene in the war increased.
@bergthe89th124 жыл бұрын
American public support to aid UK was already high before Pearl Harbor.
@dextercochran49164 жыл бұрын
*More like:* UK: We need armaments. US: sigh this new treaty has our balls UK: 😢 *Pearl Harbor* UK: 😳 Germany: DEUTSCHLAND UBER ALLES!!! declares war with no prior planning UK: 😃
@commandercritic90364 жыл бұрын
Berg the 89th agreed, but the attitude of isolationism was also high. After Japan attacked America unprovoked, that attitude evaporated, leaving only anger, hate, and the desire to help the beleaguered allies behind
@Caseytify4 жыл бұрын
Amazing. Apparently everyone here forgot about the Lend-Lease Act. Churchill always made it a point to state that the 50 destroyers & British bases were not linked. FDR was working overtime behind the scenes trying find a way to help Britain that the isolationists couldn't block.
@8ballyt9955 жыл бұрын
2:48 is genius
@Soundwave35916 жыл бұрын
For everyone dumping on the US for not doing more early in the war, take into account that at the time this phone call took place, the entire US army only consisted of about 260,000 men, armed with WWI-vintage equipment and ammunition. The British Expeditionary Force evacuated from Dunkirk was larger, and that wasn't even the entire British Army.
@0saintclark06 жыл бұрын
Well Yeah, but only because Britain had drafted every man of age whereas America had not because they were not at war at the time-
@Jake-dt7je6 жыл бұрын
i agree with you
@coyoteduster89196 жыл бұрын
not to mention america was suffering from the depression
@tylergordon12126 жыл бұрын
Soundwave3591 very true nobody ever wants to take into account we didn’t really have a standing military ready to fight at this time. The army had maybe 250,00 people the navy probably if lucky 100,00 including the marine corps so that’s only 350,000 people. At this stage we wouldn’t have really been a help, we were still really struggling with the depression.
@GamerFish996 жыл бұрын
@@coyoteduster8919 So was the rest of the world, and the US had recovered by then.
@tporter43332 жыл бұрын
The atmosphere used in this scene to convey the hopelessness and fear he felt in this moment was genius
@daustin8888 Жыл бұрын
I felt like a fly on the wall in this scene. It really did a good job capturing the anxiety and uncertainty that Churchill and England were feeling at the time.
@robertheisenberg68676 жыл бұрын
Yeah that’s what “American” used to sound like. Those accent today exist in the southern part of US and old Afro-American. This is fantastic
@davidw.27916 жыл бұрын
Robert Heisenberg Which state was FDR raised in?
@irkhanbasc6 жыл бұрын
FDR was raised in Hyde Park, N.Y., in the Hudson valley north of NYC. He was educated at Groton and Harvard, so that probably explains the accent.
@Pius-XI6 жыл бұрын
Robert Heisenberg John Kerry is a good example of an upper class American accent
@charlesramirez5876 жыл бұрын
Mid Atlantic accent like his cousin Theodore not a Virginian accent nor southern drawls, this accent was Northern US mostly in New England and new york aristocracy.
@baneofsinstheoneandonly84776 жыл бұрын
These days accents sound gay and feminine ugh
@grumpymonkeyenterprises64138 ай бұрын
I love how Roosevelt is just like “ sorry old chap, my hands are tied old boy” 😂
@stevencooper44226 ай бұрын
Roosevelt's advisors specifically wished to see an end to the British Empire as it traditionally stood. Bretton Woods is an example of this even after the war had ended. Morgenthau was quite the individual...
@yatsumleung8618 Жыл бұрын
1:45 Fun fact. To circumvent this rule, the US and Canadian governments built many airports with runways spanning the border, one end at each country. The pilots would just land on the US side and taxi to the Canadian side for delivery. Or they can just stop short of the border (middle of the runway) and push the planes across.
@MartinSage2 жыл бұрын
I laughed when he says “ We PAIDED FOR THEM!! With the money we borrowed from you!”
@generalgrievousproductions4 жыл бұрын
"Well I guess you could push them yourself. Damn planes have wheels!" I'm dead AF 😂😂🤣🤣
@sr.royaldoge52756 жыл бұрын
The graveness of the situation gives me chills, this scene is great.
@stephenjackson61116 жыл бұрын
It's interesting the lengths President Roosevelt had to go through to help the Allies. They did indeed have to move purchased aircraft to the Canadian border, and under the Neutrality Laws only civilians could transport them across on the ground. They could not legally be flown, though they could have been crated and delivered by train or freighter. FDR also could not provide the ships requested at this time which were desperately needed to fight the U-boats, as the isolationists in Congress would never have allowed it. It was only after the 1940 elections and the swing of sentiment towards the Allies after the fall of France that Roosevelt could negotiate the "destroyers for bases" deal, providing 50 old destroyers and 10 new Coast Guard cutters to the Allies. Only then could he propose lend-lease.
@sirtrollalot77626 жыл бұрын
An interesting story that I have heard is that so many Americans were disgusted with how their government refused to get involved in the war that they joined Canadian regiments and in turn became commonwealth soldiers. Thus able to fight in the war.
@franzibe56206 жыл бұрын
Stephen Jackson wait can you simply tell me why Roosevelt couldnt hand over the P-40 planes that Britain purchased from them?
@stephenjackson61116 жыл бұрын
The various Neutrality Acts of the 1930s, pushed by Republicans and Southern Democratic isolationists, at first prevented ALL transfers and sales to to nations at war, but Roosevelt chipped away at them and by late 1939 the Allies could purchase with cash (or loans from American banks). However, direct transshipment of military equipment were still banned. Having civilians drag them across the border was a clever evasion of the spirit of the law while technically not violating the letter of it. Here's a contemporary news article and photo: 56755.blogspot.com/2007/07/ww-ii-planes-cross-border-by-pembina.html
@akreebs936 жыл бұрын
Their were also American pilots who went over and flew for the RAF.
@Fedaykin246 жыл бұрын
Agreed it was a complex issue which is easy with our modern eyes to not understand American national sentiment at the time. It is a mark of Roosevelt's quality as a man that he pushed the very edge of what he could get away with to help Britain at the time. The Destroyers were largely symbolic rather than particular use as they were old and obsolete. Modern new Destroyers supplied under Lend Lease later in the war were of course very useful to the Royal Navy. Britain paid a heavy price for the war materials America supplied giving up not only international basing rights but also the Crown Jewels of our military industrial secrets from advanced radar technology through to breakthroughs in SONAR.
@fullanalysis935 жыл бұрын
The directing and cinematography of this scene is just great.
@VegasViking4203 жыл бұрын
They captures the dire helplessness of Churchill's situation perfectly. Imagine that feeling, alone in the silence, with impending doom from a monsterous enemy waiting at the door, and nobody to rely on for help...... a team of horses.....
@antonioacevedo52002 жыл бұрын
The last few seconds of the scene really capture Churchill's feeling of being alone and abandoned.
@landonsmith33546 жыл бұрын
This movie has some of the best directing I've ever seen
@ClaireIamma4 жыл бұрын
This scene is incredible, ‘cause two greatest men of that time had a conversation to help and to save them. Seems a little and simple chat, but in real...
@Kardia_of_Rhodes4 жыл бұрын
For those wondering if American Intervention in 39 would've helped change the outcome: The US Military in the late 30s and early 40s was so badly underfunded that General Patton was known to visit his local hardware store to acquire the parts necessary to maintain his tanks. There were also several cases of Machine Gun Crews being trained with 2x4s and not actual machine guns.
@AllThingsCubey4 жыл бұрын
Yes but their industry was VAST. Britain wasn't asking for their current hardware. We were either asking for things they were already close to done with (small, very old destroyers) or new equipment coming off the production lines that were rapidly growing in speed and size.
@godusopp27522 жыл бұрын
@@AllThingsCubey Exactly this "americas army was small" arguments are nonsense, we didn't have force conscripture so our army was always small. same with the bef pre war, But america has the ability to mobilize like no other, we have almost infinite resources and millions of men
@mharley3791 Жыл бұрын
@@godusopp2752the problem was the scale of the resources needed would require significant funding, which would have to go through congress. There was no way in hell it was passing, especially in this scene states that congress passed another law preventing military aid. I think people downplay how deeply the American people did not want to go to war.
@inigobantok157911 ай бұрын
Like how you phrase turning a civilian peacetime economy into a war economy to a flip of a coin. That's not how transition of resources was done at that point@@godusopp2752
@originaldon50015 жыл бұрын
Yesterday I was at the Winston Churchill warroom museum, and the shot at 2:33 is exactly the office he had underground. This is such a perfect portrayal of the actual events!
@Lords19974 жыл бұрын
This part makes me so sad. I could feel the frustration & how Churchill was doing all he could do, his back against the wall. Literally the fate of his nation, it’s empire, & of the freedom of millions on his shoulders.
@Reliavl Жыл бұрын
“50 old destroyers, even 40 would do.” He’s so desperate it makes you feel bad
@benrogers96933 жыл бұрын
Man when he said, “in more ways than you could possibly know.” I felt that!!
@DaftSwank4 жыл бұрын
This was the most agonizing and heartbreaking scene - and the reason why Gary Oldman won a Best Actor Oscar!
@charliedallachie35393 жыл бұрын
As an American I felt sad in this scene.... it’s like leaving your brother to get mugged when you could help
@maxdecphoenix Жыл бұрын
You shouldn't. Your ancestors left Europe for a good reason. Far from being a 'brother', European allies are just those trashy, drunk family members who can't stop getting in to fights over nothing who you don't want around. The fallout from these choices is still going on today. Once the war was settled, the occupation had to be settled. Which directly led into the cold war. Which directly led to NATO. Which has led to the U.S. covering the defense budget for Europe for the preceding 80 years, which has now led directly into the conflicts between Russia and Crimea and Ukraine. Roosevelte's insistence to involve the U.S. in this war, gave U.S. politicians a taste for influence and control that they have never tired of.
@lennonkelly-james269310 ай бұрын
@@maxdecphoenix Their ancestors left Europe because they were salty about not being able to force their idiotic doctrines on the masses. The US is the only NATO country to trigger article five and gets into needless wars all of the time which is why becoming an ally of England Jr is suicidal.
@CodeUK935 ай бұрын
@@maxdecphoenixoh shut up you tart, don’t even know what you’re talking about.. except politicians greed
@byronarvanitis11895 ай бұрын
@@maxdecphoenixyou are not covering the defence budget of my country, Greece, nor France's, nor many other European countries that spend a shitload of money buying your planes and your guns and supporting the American economy. By the way, I bet you haven't spent a single minute of your life on military service. Now just sit back and let Putler conquer the West.
@sutty852 ай бұрын
@maxdecphoenix What a rant! Bellend!
@ET_Bermuda6 жыл бұрын
I don't know why I keep watching this particular scene. It mesmerizes me.
@jimboa206 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt really wanted to do more to aid Britain, but had his hands tied in being more overt in helping. That being said, the United States did keep Britain running with supplies while Germany pounded at the gates.
@bighands694 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt had many flaws with even those in his party not liking him. They nicknamed him the tyrant.
@bighands694 жыл бұрын
@Gen. JFH They called him the tyrant because he tried to expand and pack the supreme court.
@billyconnolli82244 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 He incarcerated over 120,000 innocent Japanese American citizens during the war. Seems pretty tyrannical to me.
@Senaleb4 жыл бұрын
@@billyconnolli8224 in fairness...japanese spying was a real issue back then. Pearl Harbor sort of proved the point I'd think. It wasn't an easy decision by any measure.
@billyconnolli82244 жыл бұрын
@@Senaleb That makes sense. It still wasn't right but I can understand that reasoning. That's fair enough.
@razzamatronic98825 жыл бұрын
2:35 is one of my favorite scenes of all movies I've ever watched
@redlizerad82683 жыл бұрын
WW1 and WW2 was definitely the climax of human history. Never before had we ever seen anything like this on such a large scale and had such large impact on us as a species.
@inigobantok15792 ай бұрын
Those wars basically built what we now live as the Modern World. From Politics, Science and Social Construct.
@davidmckissick57986 жыл бұрын
The Brits stood alone while we played the odds. The Brits saved civilization. it was their finest hour.
@davidmckissick57986 жыл бұрын
its called 'retreat to fight another day'. do u attack a superior force and get wiped out? try to make sense
@davidmckissick57986 жыл бұрын
you are an excellent Monday morning quarterback. you are blessed with 20 20 hindsight and your points are weak. you are conflating the escape from dunkirk with the Munich conference. there is an argument that Britain needed that extra time to develop the spitfire and ramp production. (as well as working radar development). Now go ahead and jumble up the facts. its what you do
@Dumlen6 жыл бұрын
Exactly who does eastern europe think saved them? The soviets? I wouldn't call 40+ years of further occupation from a foreign power being saved. The phony war was a disgrace, I know, but I don't think they could have done that much at that point in time. As with France, the weakest parts of the german frontline were in the benelux countries, which france and britain weren't allowed to enter at that time since Belgium and the Netherlands had pushed for their neutrality and didn't want to put their nations into another Great War. Pushing through the Siegfried Line wouldn't have been possible at that time and the bombing raids from The RAF and the french airforce were still limited to hitting civilian targets. All they could do at that time was try to hold the line and wait, and when Germany finally attacked they were quickly outmanouvered and pushed back. It is easy to look back at this with perfect hindsight now, but put yourself in that situation at that point at time and tell me how you would convince your nation and its leaders to start another great war over a nation they didn't have the means to reach without having to fight both the soviet union and their at that time, german allies.
@MWarne586 жыл бұрын
Never could figure out how the allies fighting Germany 'saved civilization'....in 1945 we left central and Eastern Europe to the communists who proceeded to enslave and kill millions more than the Nazis
@UKOGBN6 жыл бұрын
What exactly could France have done ?? their entire national defense doctrine was based on static defense ......... Given the French losses in the First War who can blame them. And your right the war was not Black and White , both Britain and Franc had there own agenda in the war and just as today as it was then big players shit on the little ones that's unfortunately life.
@soughnymaugh2 жыл бұрын
0:45 you can hear FDR put his face in his hands. He must’ve been gutted having to no to him.
@mithikx5 жыл бұрын
The US public and I believe both Houses were heavily isolationists and wanted to remain neutral, though as I understand it Roosevelt wanted to help the UK and jumped through every loophole out there to not violate the US' "neutrality" stance. IMO it was only after the price was paid in blood by all sides did the US understood the consequences of sitting on the sidelines. I'd like to think as an American that the US would never leave the UK hanging as it were, during the Falklands War Reagan ordered preparations to make the USS Iwo Jima (LPH-2) available for use by the RN as well as having retired USN sailors who knew how to operate the ship crew her and train RN sailors in her operation. The plan was in response to an informal request made by the UK should one of their carriers become inoperable or if sunk. The US is/was supposed to remain neutral regarding affairs and conflicts in South America but of course that plainly was never the case.
@stupidben9994 жыл бұрын
Isolationists help evil triumph. They don't deserve freedom & democracy as they are not keen to defend them.
@Joker-yw9hl4 жыл бұрын
I love the idea of "the special relationship" but as a Brit, it's quite clear when you look through history that the United States doesn't really throw you a bone without conditions attached. It's kind of fair enough. It'll be interesting to see how America deals with Britain in a trade deal Post-Brexit. Does it throw a bone or rip the UK off for everything it's worth as much as it can. Would be unfortunate if we have to leave negotiations due to US insistence on certain issues
@zagorith144 жыл бұрын
@@Joker-yw9hl That's literally any country though. No country is going to sign up for a deal where they'd get royally screwed. Makes no sense. If the UK decides to leave negotiations because they couldn't formulate a deal that was to both their and our liking, then so be it. That's the way it works. Either go elsewhere for a deal, or keep negotiations until a deal can be settled upon.
@zagorith144 жыл бұрын
@@stupidben999 Except for when the anti-isolationist rhetoric becomes over reaching authority, which then becomes the "evil" that you speak of. Doesn't take much for one thing to become another.
@zagorith144 жыл бұрын
Even then there were a lot of people who wanted us to join the fight. Regrettably, the US let the UK down in WW2. At least at first. Once policies loosened and we were able to provide supplies and boots on the ground, the UK prospects started to change. They needed help, and we let them down. I just hope it won't happen again. Though hopefully a situation won't rise like that again.
@fernandomurillo9272 Жыл бұрын
The stress Churchill must of had at that time. Can not feel the loneliness he had trying to keep things alive
@zakapholiac93773 жыл бұрын
Couldn’t even imagine what Churchill was going through the first couple years of the war. Back against the wall and being given no lifeline
@mikediamond437 Жыл бұрын
Much respect to the Brits, tough bastards.
@bcampbell4987 Жыл бұрын
Great Franklin Roosevelt impression. I absolutely love this movie.
@fredocarroll3 жыл бұрын
Since dozens of comments quote the same line while making the same usage error, permit me to point out something once for all of them. The British *paid* for the fighters, _not_ *payed* for them. *Paid* is the past tense of _pay_ used when discussing a transaction exchanging goods or currency holding value. *Payed* is the past tense of the _nautical_ uses of _pay_ and nothing else. So, "He *paid* for the book," means that someone provided money or goods/services in exchange for a book. Conversely, "She *payed* out the rope," means that someone put slack in the rope in order to lengthen the line. It can also be used to refer to caulking seams with pitch or tar.
@TheGreekDream433 жыл бұрын
The atmosphere OMG the feeling it’s like something really really evil is waiting for Churchill
@tomservo53473 жыл бұрын
I must say, thanks to my Dad that always watched British shows on public television (back in the old days when we had 4 or 5 channels) and him being a bit of an Anglophile I got to hear and experience British culture in a limited extent. Even more odd is my Dad is a Midwest US farmer with a German wife he met because of getting drafted. There's a charm to Brits that's there-but hard to pinpoint. The mastery of the understatement? The dry humor? Obsession with tradition? Despite our differences we made do with one of the best alliances in history. (A familiar tie with you guys once being 'the mother country'.) I've recently found out that I have ancestral DNA from the Mersey and North London areas along with great-great grandparents of the full Welsh persuasion. My wife and I have recently become familiar with the little band of soldiers from 'Walmington-On-Sea' and love it!
@nathanstorm8093Ай бұрын
Winston Churchill will always be my number 1 hero. He was one of the most vocal and consistent critics of appeasement, which is arguably what allowed ww2 to happen. He faced down a dark curtain trying to fall over the free world, almost alone up until the United States joined. He was known to get into depression episodes were he would lock himself away in his room for days without eating or drinking. Actually it’s been hypothesized that Winston Churchill may have had bipolar disorder, something I also have. The man was able to somehow find the strength to keep himself together, and keep his nation together to fight against the greatest tyranny the modern world had seen. One of the strongest political leaders in history in my opinion.
@Jake-rs9nq2 жыл бұрын
This really did happen, although the planes were only dragged a short distance, just over the actual border. American pilots would land in a field, Canadians dragged them over and took off from the same field.
@holyromanempireball4655 жыл бұрын
I like how roosevelt did his best to come up with ideas to send supplies to the British despite the neutrality document being signed, does to show you that he really did care about the British cause
@holyromanempireball4655 жыл бұрын
@Alejandro Valdovinos what do you mean sadd
@tacoheadmakenzie93113 жыл бұрын
@@holyromanempireball465 It means that he can't spell "sad".
@kenp22182 жыл бұрын
Roosevelt and his advisors saw what was going on in Europe, and could read the writing on the wall. But they could only do so much until the majority of US citizens were ready and willing to fight. Like Churchill, Roosevelt was a Very Good Communicator in his own right! His fireside chats during the Great Depression were very uplifting to the nation. When he felt the public mood was ready, he and his administration pushed through the Lend/Lease Act - his analogy was simple and direct, he basically said: "suppose your neighbor's house is on fire, and he needs a hose to put it out. You don't ask your neighbor to pay for the hose while his house is burning, you let him use your hose to put out the fire, so it doesn't spread to your house.
@tomben6180 Жыл бұрын
@@kenp2218 I’m British and an amateur historian and this is absolutely true.
@drewnash81135 жыл бұрын
"But we payed for them with the... with the money we borrowed from you..."
@jamesmason84364 жыл бұрын
*paid. Can anyone spell down here?
@MrJoshua18753 жыл бұрын
That's made up
@jonathan_morgan_st Жыл бұрын
It's easy to say this now, 80 years separated from its event, but as an American, this scene shamed me to my core, I can't imagine how let down and alone Mr. Churchill must have felt - how he had the fortitude and will to stare down Hitler and steer his Nation, with England all alone, it's miraculous.
@KWSpence2 жыл бұрын
“We payed for them…with the money we borrowed from you” I AM DECEASED 😂
@charlescoleman55093 жыл бұрын
I almost thought they sampled Roosevelt’s actual voice from recordings. But it was the actor David Strathairn. Amazing performance.
@ungmd212 жыл бұрын
So many similarities in this move to the Ukraine war. This is like Poland offering jets to them but the US won't participate to try to not escalate the war. Zelensky addressing the UK Parliament and actually using Churchill's words of never surrendering, the scene with Churchill in the subway and the determination of the people to never give up. History repeats itself.
@bugwar55452 жыл бұрын
Yep. When good men do nothing.
@King-gv4lg2 жыл бұрын
don't worry, we just need another bad guy to bomb some random USA naval base somewhere in an island, then they will help
@cuscoothriyas51632 жыл бұрын
Really interesting to see how the new lend lease bill sways things
@billardbenjamin61642 жыл бұрын
I've been doing alot of research on this!
@americancaesar60652 жыл бұрын
Now the US is approving billions in worth of equipment to be shipped to Ukraine. What are they gonna do, bomb us? We've only been preparing for war with the USSR for the last 80 years
@ranabanik13544 жыл бұрын
Everyone talking about history and war efforts. But no one talked how amazing performance has Gary Oldman has shown in his masterpiece act as Winston Churchill.
@evalig8714 жыл бұрын
Rana Banik that is literally one of the main talking points throughout all these clips what
@BUMMY1053 жыл бұрын
I love Roosevelt in this scene. His appearance was minor and short, but you can tell that he was trying his best to help Churchill with the amount of power and time that he had. The war was too early to give Roosevelt any decisive leeway to conduct any wartime measures to help the British, and had even devised a plan to give the planes to Churchill under the risk of the press and an impeachment trial on the basis of giving war goods to wartime nations without direct assessment to Congress-- a clear violation to the new Neutrality Act and Roosevelt's powers as the President. With the help of Churchill's courage, and his speech to parliament at the end of the film, Roosevelt had enough time and political gambling to institute a Lend-Lease program to show Congress that the United States Foreign Policy must protect the right of freedom to the nations in Europe and secure the protection of American trade and homeland security, with the ability to do so without a general focus to active war involvement. Churchill was truly at his most darkest hour on his first attempts at being the Prime Minister, having to convince the powers of the world at the gravest times that the fight was for moral justice to every individual who are and would be alive and not for the survival of everyone that day.
@nguyenluan11922 жыл бұрын
2:33 oh the frame, we can tell how lonely and helpless he was just by that one frame
@TheFlutecart Жыл бұрын
Without the tenacity and sheer indomitability of Churchill and the Brits, the world would be a much different place today. One the bravest moments in all of history. When I'm facing the impossible, there is a Churchill inside that won't let me give up.
@stevencooper44226 ай бұрын
Bro, I'd rather be speaking German than be forced to celebrate pride month every year. If our ancestors saw what would become of supporting the Soviets we would never have fought.
@mikehancho20823 жыл бұрын
Winston Churchill stated later in his life that the attack on Pearl Harbor brought him “the greatest joy”. “So we had won after all! England would live; Britain would live; the Commonwealth of Nations and the Empire would live.” “Hitler’s fate,” Churchill continued, “was sealed. Mussolini’s fate was sealed.” “As for the Japanese,” he wrote, “they would be ground to powder.”
@seanpetaia Жыл бұрын
That most mafia way to say it.
@CanImperator4 жыл бұрын
"We payed for them with the money that we borrowed from you" I believe that was the motto of the British empire.
@dlarge65024 жыл бұрын
No we got compensation for the spreading of democracy, civilization, rule of law and eradication of slavery across the world. We also created a worldwide commonwealth that no other Empire ever managed to do. You're welcome.
@CanImperator4 жыл бұрын
@@dlarge6502 The good and the bad of empire are probably about on par in this case ;)
@UKOGBN4 жыл бұрын
This scene is a fiction Britain until the advent of lend lease paid in cash using its gold reserve for all arms equipment from the USA and was legally able to do so as long as those items were transported to the UK via non US shipping under the Cash and Carry legislation in 1939 that replaced the Neutrality Act of 37 in the US.
@omolevincentia34473 жыл бұрын
@@dlarge6502 are you mad,who asked you idiots for that
@MrJoshua18753 жыл бұрын
@@omolevincentia3447 Who asked for Slavery to be abolished? Most of the world.
@SuperZombieBros4 жыл бұрын
You can tell how worried Churchill is in this scene.
@luiseduardo5862 жыл бұрын
I just find fascinating all the noises of static and buzzing of that call.
@Gotobar4 жыл бұрын
“Well I guess you could push them yourself, the damn things HAVE wheels”
@aprilkalcsa93363 жыл бұрын
Gary Oldman is an absolute genius! No actor, past or present, can touch him.
@Cpl._Dwayne_HicksАй бұрын
Like Bruno Ganz as Hitler in Downfall
@abphoto5 жыл бұрын
When Pearl Harbour was bombed, Churchhill popped a glass of champagne and said Here come the Americans.
@ryanplusone15594 жыл бұрын
My Grandfather was a young boy in England during WW2. He specifically remembers the English citizens' disdain for the United States of America throughout the war, this being a prime example why. He said there was initial hope across the country that banded together, the Alliance forces would defeat the Axis powers. The day it was published that the U.S. would not be supporting their efforts of resistance, my Grandpa said his mother and father returned home from work with the news, sat down on the floor, and cried for a very long time. He can remember the Battle of Britain fairly vividly, the air raid sirens, explosions, entire city blocks disappearing in a matter of minutes, and classmates not showing up to school the next day only to find out them and their family had been killed by German bombings. Two things he told me that I will forever remember as a point of privilege; His father came home from work with a banana,, something my Grandpa had never seen before. Fresh fruit and vegetables were almost non-existent since German u-boats and warplanes would constantly destroy incoming ships carrying supplies. I can only imagine how his Dad was able to get his hands on one. It must have cost him a fortune and he had to have had some luck on his side too. My Grandpa had his first bite of it and spat it out; he said he hated the taste of it. The next thing he remembers is waking up on the other side of the room with a terrible pain in his head. His dad had backhanded him and sent him flying across the room. Another time, my Grandpa said he can remember British soldiers coming to their front door and asking his mother to donate all spare metal in the house that they could. This included cutlery, pots, pans, and any other bits of metal that could be used towards the war effort (think smelting the metal down of these household items to be used for tanks, planes, etc). By the time the soldiers had been given what the family could spare, my Grandpa said between the entire household there was 1 pan, 1 pot, 1 fork, 1 spoon, and 1 knife. Nothing more for an entire family. The crazy thing is that his mother and father were more than happy to sacrifice those things because their literal survival was on the line. I can't imagine the suffering and torment the people of England went through during the war. I'm sure it was unimaginable. But when my Grandpa talks about how the people there felt betrayed and abandoned by the U.S. in their time of need, and then I see a clip like this...I can certainly understand why they would be.
@nickdanger38024 жыл бұрын
Was there a treaty of some kind that required the USA to give anything to Britain? The Commonwealth supplied Britain, but not for free.
@LegacyArkGames3 жыл бұрын
But Roosevelt did support the British. His hands were publicly tied by bureaucracy and legislation such as the Neutrality Act. However, he was friends with Churchill and his wish to aid him was genuine. That's why FDR continually jumped through hoops to find clever ways of getting help to the British, such as having planes pulled across the border to Canada by horses as cited in this scene, thus getting around the Neutrality Act.
@kenp22182 жыл бұрын
I am sure the British people were disappointed that the US could not help in providing as much war material as the UK was requesting; but I doubt that the British people had "disdain for the United States of America throughout the war". After the fall of France and especially after Pearl Harbor, the amount of war material that the US provided to Britain, Russia, China and other allies was staggering! If anyone on this thread is interested in hearing the story in Churchill's own words, I highly recommend that you read Winston Churchill's excellent 6 volume set titled "The Second World War" - it is quite enlightening!
@antonioacevedo52002 жыл бұрын
You fail to mention that America paid a terrible price bailing Europe out of the first Word War and weren't very enthusiastic to pay a similar price in the second one.
@hannahdyson71292 жыл бұрын
@@antonioacevedo5200 Europe jad paid a even bigger price. Most of Europe lost more on both Worpd Wars than the US has throughout its history.
@johnbattle17643 жыл бұрын
this is the saddest scene in the movie to me
@MichaelJ442 жыл бұрын
God the sound at 0:50 sounds so realistic. The tone, the poor quality and the fade in of Roosevelt’s voice after it struggled to pick up his voice for the first word or two
@joehickey85972 жыл бұрын
That was phone quality then.
@CT--gs1wj6 жыл бұрын
Completing the focus "Destroyer for Bases" in Hoi4 be like...
@evancoveney62685 жыл бұрын
As painful as this scene is, I believe we Americans did the right thing in striving for peace until war was unavoidable.
@thevillaaston78115 жыл бұрын
The scene never took place
@evancoveney62685 жыл бұрын
@@thevillaaston7811 It's not about whether it happened. It's about our stance in the early years of the war.
@thevillaaston78115 жыл бұрын
@Nick Bauer The Battle of Britain and the attack on Russia sealed Hitler's doom.
@thevillaaston78115 жыл бұрын
@Nick Bauer The Battle of the Atlantic was mainly won by Britain. The Royal Navy sank three quarters of all U-boats destroyed, the key weapons in the war against the U-boats were of British origin. Lend-Lease amounted 11% of Britain's needs across the war years and did start to arrive in Britain until April 1941 - months after the danger to Britain had passed. Lend-Lease amounted 5% of Russia's needs across the war years and the US part did start to arrive in Russia until June 1942 - months after the main danger to Russia had passed. British and Canadian supplies had been arriving in Russia since he Autumn of 1941. As for the great invasion of Normandy, 55% of the aircraft were British, 79% of the warships were British , 67% of the landing ships were British. The troop numbers were equal until the Battle of Normandy was decided. The 3-1 ratio of troops did not occur until April 1945. The great invasion of Normandy could not have taken place without Britain a the launching point, British intelligence gathering, two British built harbours and British built fuel lines under the sea.
@thevillaaston78115 жыл бұрын
@Nick Bauer On D-Day (06.06.44), the troop figures were US 73,000, Canada 22,000, Britain 63,000. That ration stayed in place as troop numbers increased util near the end of the fighting in Normady. 'If you didn't need us, Winston Churchill wouldn't have been pleading for us to enter the war since 1940' Churchill did not plead for anything in 1940. Look at volume ll of his history of the war for the correspondence.' when Rommel had pushed you to the pyramids and was threatening to conquer the whole Middle East. "I adjure you, Mr. President, not to underestimate the consequences which would follow from a Middle East collapse." Churchill was merely pointing out the importance of the Middle East to what he saw as an uninformed ally. This is what was then stated: Memorandum for Hon. Harry L. Hopkins, General Marshall and Admiral King Subject: Instructions for London Conference, July 1942 16 July 42 9. I am opposed to an American all-out effort in the Pacific against Japan with the view to her defeat as quickly as possible. It is of the utmost importance that we appreciate that the defeat of Japan does not defeat Germany and that American concentration against Japan this year or in 1943 increases the chance of complete domination of Europe and Africa. On the other hand, it is obvious that defeat of Germany or the holding of Germany in 1942 or in 1943 means probable eventual defeat of Germany in the European and African theatre and in the Near east. Defeat of Germany means the defeat of Japan, probably of without firing a shot or losing a life. Franklin D. Roosevelt Commander-in-Chief As for Churchill and Hitler's fate: ‘On November 9 Mr. Neville Chamberlain died at his country home in Hampshire. I had obtained the King’s permission to have him supplied with the cabinet papers, and until a few days before the end he followed our affairs with keenness, interest, and tenacity. He met the approach of death with a steady eye. I think he died with the comfort of at least knowing that his country had at least turned the corner.’ 'history will affirm that the Russian resistance broke the power of the German armies and inflicted mortal injury upon the life-energies of the German nation' There is plenty more. 'Also, as I recall, for the most part, WE ALONE took on the Japanese Empire at the same time with a bare minimum or assistance from you, the Russians, or anyone else. We alone conquered Japan and destroyed the Japanese Empire. ' Get real. More than half of the Japanese Army was in fact facing British, Commonwealth, Empire and Chinese forces. The Pacific was actually second in Japanese ambitions to SE Asia and beyond. The Atom Bomb actually involved British and Canadian science as well.
@leonpennington16485 жыл бұрын
We came so close to capitulating!!!!! But we didnt, God bless Churchill!!!!! :p
@jjrj85684 жыл бұрын
So close only from the perspective of the cowards and the traitors. Churchill was ready and willing to fight since the beginning.
@maytheoddsbeinyourfavour4 жыл бұрын
@@jjrj8568 Not really, after the fall of France there was a lot of opposition in continuing the war. It was only Churchill’s speeches and determination that kept the nation going. If the US had never entered the war, Britain would have slowly been strangled by German submarines, most likely forcing them into a peace conference.
@fredlandry61704 жыл бұрын
Horses pulling planes across the Canadian border. 🤣🤣🤣
@-RunninNGunnin-4 жыл бұрын
That's a bloody good plan.
@101Spacetime4 жыл бұрын
Some actors just do not act and are what you see in scenes such as this, the entire character is no longer what you know of Gary Oldman it is Churchill but Gary Oldman is paining him how he thinks, feels, and sees he would have been or was. Incredible acting such as this deserves more than an Oscar, maybe because acting such as this has the individual earn so much money that for their performance a little statuette just as meaningful. Put aside the politics of it all. Amazing acting is what we need again...
@buster1176 жыл бұрын
2:16 ( I Guess you could push them yourself 😂, lmao FDR was totally pranking Churchill )
@Beensash6 ай бұрын
No, he was genuinely looking for legal loopholes
@tubenachos Жыл бұрын
Probably the most important phone call in human history so far
@seanpetaia Жыл бұрын
I agreed
@edwardhale42942 жыл бұрын
Zelensky is asking for fighter planes to defend western democracy......'history may not repeat..but it certainly does ryhme" Mark Twain
@johnboy142 жыл бұрын
My favourite scene in the movie because it perfectly describes the hopeless position Britain found itself in during and after Dunkirk. So much for the special relationship
@nickdanger38022 жыл бұрын
As of 2006 Britain still owed the USA 4.4 Billion 1934 USD in WWI debt. In June 1940 FDR sold 500,000 "surplus" rifles, over 100,000 machine guns and millions of rounds of ammo to Britain leaving recruits in the rapidly expanding US Army to train with broomsticks. Almost all of the 100 octane avgas used in the Battle of Britain came from the USA. Churchill asked for "the loan of 40 or 50 of your older destroyers". Using a loophole, the legality of which is still being debated, less than three months later FDR traded 50 destroyers for bases that did not exist. Bermuda and locations north were thrown in "freely" in exchange for the USA assuming the protection of those areas. If you can provide any information on the "special relationship" please do so.
@Beensash6 ай бұрын
Special relationship didn't exist back then lol That came after WWII
@FormerlyNYVulgarian3 жыл бұрын
This scene alone was Oscar worthy.
@ejnorman8781 Жыл бұрын
A tour guide at the War Rooms said Churchill was jumping for joy in the hallways when he heard the news about Pearl Harbor. Not because of the deaths of course but because he didn’t have to have these sort of phone calls anymore.
@DylansPen Жыл бұрын
No one could blame Churchill for being beside himself at this moment, Britain stands alone against Germany and is losing. It must have almost felt like begging Roosevelt to do something. Nothing but respect for the Brits who fought on alone until December 1941.
@wilverbal6 жыл бұрын
Two amazing performances. Just brilliant.
@michaelvaldez50954 жыл бұрын
Great acting. The despair in Winston’s voice is quite desperate for aid
@pacather3 жыл бұрын
Just a little technical background. Transatlantic telephone calls began in 1927 and were carried on shortwave radio transmissions between New Jersey and Great Britain. This explains all the radio interference cutting into the call. However, there were scrambler circuits for caller privacy. This system remained in place until submarine telephone cables were first laid in the mid 1950s.