David Bentley Hart on Grace, with Jennifer Newsome Martin

[@kentyoung5282]

Conversation with Hart begins at 14:30

[@gfujigo]

Thank you 🙏🏿

[@mike7920]

Goodness, thank you 😅

[@peterk.6930]

I am Dutch I know the american introductions but this is ...............

[@jasonegeland1446]

Some interesting moments in this interview! Nice work!

[@DivineDarkness1528]

DBH is my spirit animal

[@RedBullGreenBear]

What you clicked on the thumbnail to view, namely the interview, starts at 16:35

[@mcnallyaar]

Found it: A Separate God: The Christian Origins of Gnosticism by Simone Petrement (Author), Carol Harrison (Translator)

[@Alkemisti]

I can say with certainty that there is no Finnish translation of _The Doors to the Sea._ The only works of Hart available in Finnish are _The Mystery of Castle MacGorilla,_ _Atheist Delusion,_ and his essay _Anarcho-Monarchism_ (published unironically by a far-right website).

[@lokeshparihar7672]

21:20 Maurice Blondell 26:50 32:36 Maxixmus Confessor 38:40 non dualist 47:45 51:30 55:17 Gnosticism

[@Jordan-hz1wr]

Does anyone know where Maximus says we are destined to become uncreated?

[@johnstewart7025]

Nothing is unchanging but change. Flux. Dao. Change is the natural state of the universe; it moves like the sea's tides, between opposites like ebb and flow, high and low, front and back.

[@kirin347]

David, the words you are searching for are "Lagomorphic Potential". 'There is no sort of Lagomorphic potential to be found within the Brassicarapa.' - sounds very Hartian. :)

[@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns]

@40:06 LOL 😆 He’s talking about Prof Ed Feser. These guys beef all the time

[@owenkelly2567]

Does anyone know if/where DBH interacts directly with process thought? He mentioned theogonic becoming in the interview and gave his reasons for rejecting it. Namely, it makes God’s identity violent, transgressing actus purus and divine simplicity. God has no history, etc. I would love to hear DBH review Iain McGilchrist’s work, The Matter with Things, in which process thought factors prominently. Any leads would be appreciated!

[@cinephemera]

He addresses process theology briefly here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pWq4cnuAq7J_lac

[@admoni.]

He does so fairly consistently throughout his work, but one point I can clearly recall is in The Experience of God when he speaks on divine impassibility, simplicity etc. Can’t recall the page numbers but hope that helps somewhat

[@ehwbest]

Somewhere on KZbin there is a conversation between the pair.

[@ResIntellecta]

45:00 😂

[@anthonydecastro6938]

yes, we come from God, but we are not God. "Christian monism" would seem to mean: we are God, not by nature but by grace, or by participation. so no, the analogia entis is not negated. but the (neo)Thomists of the Strict Observance want to revive the "pure nature" theory and therefore want to position themselves politically to take control of power in the world...

[@chanting_germ.]

You don't know what you're talking about and are wrong

[@tonydecastro6340]

@@chanting_germ. don't be stupid.