As always another great video appreciate you so much. Gimp was absolutely alien to me until I found your videos!!!
@southernexposure1233 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video and for explaining about radius and what that adjustment affects.
@vickilyn4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! I have always just taken my final image and then used the Sharpen (Unsharp Mask) filter. Unfortunately, as you mentioned, this often affects the edges so on some images I still have to play around with the colors before I am satisfied with it. I often wondered how to use the Decompose option and I plan on using that method more often.
@rolliegarcia37132 жыл бұрын
I'm here for GIMP tricks, promise
@jeganj2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Davies media design for best impact
@RU-qv3jl10 ай бұрын
Good video. I personally don’t like the global sharpening effect of the USM filter. I prefer to work on various levels of detail. As such I still decompose the image but then I use wavelet decompose on the luminosity layer. I do all my work on the decomposed luminosity layers until I am happy and then copy visible and paste over the luminosity layer. Then I recompose and the original image takes on the sharpness that I wanted. I have found that in that manner I get more control and also fewer unwanted artefacts.
@JackOgden2 жыл бұрын
Hi - going the Decompose - Lab route is great - Thanks. I am not sure it was available in pre-2.10 GIMP, but now at least you can shorten the process by copying the image to a new layer then choosing Components > Extract Component> LAB L which gives you the grey-scale LAB layer without having to decompose and copy and paste back the lab component. BTW I find this combined with the G/MIC > Details > Gradient gives me the best sharpening for my purposes. Thanks for all your excellent Tutorials!
@AstroDork Жыл бұрын
Great tutorial. In fact I'm working my way through all your GIMP tutorials among others. Who's the young lady... she has a name?
@angelluismillan3 жыл бұрын
Very clear. I use the well known method with a layer copied in luminance mode, but these ones are better. I prefer the second method: the first slightly increases brightness, not the second.
@markgholson92224 ай бұрын
I use floating dialog boxes. I put a smaller LAB box down below, then I have the bigger Original box above. So when I recompose with LAB I can instantly see the results on the original image.
@Twobarpsi Жыл бұрын
Great tutorial!
@SJQuirke2 жыл бұрын
this was indeed useful - thank you
@cosmo00804 жыл бұрын
i could see the 2nd method had better results thank you
@MarcEspie3 жыл бұрын
For the sharpen tip, how about this: do the LCh Luminance filter for the real time preview. Then delete it, do ctrl-f on the decomposed image and recompose ? I expect the parameters are pretty much going to be what you want, and that way you avoid skewing the colors.
@shanesterling19832 жыл бұрын
exactly
@gv9359 Жыл бұрын
Dude. . . that image though
@tajongsylvanus24404 жыл бұрын
Please do a tutorial on heal tool and fuzzy tool as well🙏
@ChessGrandmaster3 жыл бұрын
Just brilliant
@suggestssoyam19143 жыл бұрын
I CAME TO LEARN GIMP EDITING BUT HIS IMAGES KEEPS ME DISTRACTING. SO BEAUTIFUL GIRLS. JUST WOW GIRLS .. I MEAN EDITING
@retror.d.16304 жыл бұрын
Lol I’ll be the first to comment on those two nice 🤗
@sprinkles_0912 жыл бұрын
my images keep looking really pixelated when i try to bring the into gimp, especially when i try to put the print onto something really small. how to i keep my image quality, but still have an image that is only 100x100 but i need it to look HD. i make decor for the sims 4 and am trying to put a print on a coffee cup. lol
@sytitan4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@Jr8uup2 жыл бұрын
Aren't you worried that hot chick will find out about taking photos of her with the telephoto lens and sharpening them up for "educational" purposes? JK thanks for your help.
@laoschild864 жыл бұрын
Would it lose quality if saved as png format?
@minepro12064 жыл бұрын
No, but it's better to use tiff for anything except transparent graphics.
@sparkytheguy12203 жыл бұрын
omg you are so handsome with the beard and your haircut! don't change your look. :)
@bigii2 жыл бұрын
Check The volume of your video bro
@gerobokdapur81654 жыл бұрын
👍👍
@PaigeWhite4 жыл бұрын
Why don't you do livestreams anymore?
@DaviesMediaDesign4 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately they weren't performing as well as I would have liked them to.
@PaigeWhite4 жыл бұрын
@@DaviesMediaDesign Well that's too bad because I enjoyed them. 😥
@DaviesMediaDesign4 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed doing them - but sometimes the numbers just don’t work out :/
@coldstuff97842 жыл бұрын
lol you just had to use an image like that didn't you?
@kaleightucker54794 жыл бұрын
What is your advice on exporting an image to upload to Facebook?
@DaviesMediaDesign4 жыл бұрын
Facebook is going to end up compressing the image to whatever size it wants the image to be, and it has size limitations, so you'll want to export to JPEG.
@kaleightucker54794 жыл бұрын
@@DaviesMediaDesign, ok. Thank you.
@marcus3d4 жыл бұрын
Nonono, do all the edits EXCEPT sharpening before downscaling it, but ALWAYS sharpen last. That's because the resize will introduce softness due to interpolation.
@DaviesMediaDesign4 жыл бұрын
I understand the logic, but I simply disagree that you should wait to sharpen till after you scale. You are going to lose pixels regardless when you scale because of interpolation, but I think the sharpening looks better when it's performed on the original image versus the scaled image. Plus, you can save your original image with the sharpening, and come back to it any time and scale it down for any project or medium. I have run the tests and this is what I prefer. You can still get good results sharpening the scaled image, though. Simply turn down the radius before cranking up the amount.
@marcus3d4 жыл бұрын
@@DaviesMediaDesign I did some more tests now, too, and found that the best results seem to be when sharpening both before AND after the resize. Do a slightly-less-than-normal sharpening before the resize, and then do another slightly-less-than-normal sharpening after it (with radius