I saw many video lectures but lots of doubts and confusion. I find your lecture crisp and clear. no confusion at all. You r really good at teaching. Thank you!!
@MdSultanurAshikin2 ай бұрын
Thanks, this was really helpful. I forgot everything from my undergrad. It was a very useful refresher
@sachinburman61254 жыл бұрын
Your way to teaching is awesome, thanks buddy
@Gavin_Francis6 жыл бұрын
I'm a student of bits-pilani...........and honestly u teach much..much better than our bits-pilani faculty...hands down !!!!!
@TanveshDabholkar6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, appreciated.
@DM-ce6su6 жыл бұрын
If K x delta = Ac Then K x delta - Ac should be 0 ?no?why is it R?
@neanderthall91024 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much, very simple and clear, it help encourage young engineers do not be afraid about beam fem and math"
@calvinsanudo23102 жыл бұрын
thanks man this was so helpful
@Muhammad-Ahmad-khan Жыл бұрын
Sir if there is some displacement or settlement already given on any joint let say 1.5mm settel on joint B then how we will proceed
@Edruezzi Жыл бұрын
So can you provide a means of calculating the wertical (sic) range?
@sethmcbrown94924 жыл бұрын
Sir You are a legend! A whole legend!!
@DCBAonline4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@markmumiriki29794 жыл бұрын
hello please where we not supposed to have 3elements? as where there is a point charge we put a joint there
@K5h1tij7 жыл бұрын
Sirr please make more videos on stiffness matrix problems. Thanks a Lot!
@Athrav15126 жыл бұрын
For calculation of Ar1 matrix value of Ra comes out to be 53.34 and Rb as 26.66 your values is different from my values which one is correct pls tell ☺
@thanomm5 жыл бұрын
59.26 , 20.74 are correct Ra = 53.34 + 5.926 = 59.26 Rb = 26.66 - 5.926 = 20.74 +- 5.926 = due to the moment
@oliviascully10875 жыл бұрын
@@thanomm can i know how to get the value of +- 5.926?
@moota.shivasaikumar66175 жыл бұрын
@@thanomm 5.926 ?? please tell me
@liliankabelle69434 жыл бұрын
Very good teacher!!! Super helpful
@Gilang24mg3 жыл бұрын
isn't the Ac is the summed up from the Aj and Ar instead?
@MemewVlogs4 жыл бұрын
do you have the 2x2 matrix approach and 6x6?
@structuralanalysis27904 жыл бұрын
Rb is an input or output, 40 kn ?
@prativalamichhane35636 жыл бұрын
Why [Ar] is subtracted from [Aj] in calculating combined load matrix.please reply soon.
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Well to just simply say, it is the method which has to be followed but if you want an explanation than, there we are dealing with two kinds of matrix one is a load matrix and another one is a reaction matrix, take note that both are opposite in nature to each other and hence if we have to combine them we have to change the sign of reaction matrix i.e. done by subtracting it and hence Ar is subtracted from Aj.
@prativalamichhane35636 жыл бұрын
DCBA online Thank you Sir.
@sahilfootbal6 жыл бұрын
what if there is a downward settlement in joint B? what will we take the sign of the settlement as? (del b)
@cfvarponariza45445 жыл бұрын
is stiffness method and matrix displacement method are the same?
@ahmedismail47436 жыл бұрын
when you were finding for the member reaction matrix for member 2 @ 18:30 why did you assume that the member is fixed from both sides, you can apply the FEM as FEMbc= WL^2/8 since its a roller ended beam. Because you will be getting a different answer if you're assuming its fixed ended from both sides
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Ahmed Ismail while writing those equations you need to consider all supports to be fixed, the fact that it is a roller would be used in Step 7 when you cancel out all what is not required.
@ahmedismail47436 жыл бұрын
So you mean that if i applied the advanced FEM equation for the roller ended part as WL^2/8 it would be wrong when am writing down the Reaction matrix, And its a must to to assume that its always a fixed end even though its not always fixed ended? Thank you sir for your quick response and you have earned your self a new subscriber :)
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Ahmed Ismail by writing advanced FEM equation u mean finite element method quation or fixed end moment equations?, that step was reaction step and you need to write the fixed end moments ans reactions generated at each span and for that matte you need to assume every span to be a fixed end span.
@ahmedismail47436 жыл бұрын
DCBA online I mean the fixed end moment equations for a roller/pin ended span like in this example which I was suggesting to use wl^2/8 and assume that it's only fixed from one end which is b when analysing Member 2
@adelbadiee17084 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Fantastic video! Please keep up the good work
@bhabeshpramani27775 жыл бұрын
better my class teacher awsm sir
@JohnEloi4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your knowledge! Very useful...
@thiagarajanv11435 ай бұрын
Nice explanation. But I have doubt whether AC=AJ-AR or AC=AJ+AR as already considered the sign for each force and moment. Pleas clarify.
@hb-cuo3 жыл бұрын
Sir how can we analyse beam with crack (v notch)
@kungFu.panda92117 жыл бұрын
Really Helpfull!! Hats off to DCBA.
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
vikas Dudi thanks a lot bro
@akashgohel53756 жыл бұрын
Sir plz solve an overhanging beam using this method..
@mukulattri77806 жыл бұрын
Superb explanation 😊😊👏👏
@diegolopezpereyra97213 жыл бұрын
SALUDOS DESDE MEXICO, ME ASEGURASTE EL 10!
@DCBAonline3 жыл бұрын
Encantado de poder ayudar, gracias!
@jayeshpatil2007 жыл бұрын
Sir , please made videos on ' strain energy method ' this is very helpful for engineering students.
@radiataknight49482 жыл бұрын
what happen if there is a hinge?
@shanumishra10497 жыл бұрын
DCBA sir flexibility matrix method....mein Jo apne method btaya hai...usse answer match nhi kar rha..
@isa_sunasara58715 жыл бұрын
can you explain how to create a one example of matrix mathod in excel sheet.....plz
@msc.str.engineermohammedad42694 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot for ur effort , please do you have a video of frame analysis in the same way ?
@indiramishra70134 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your valuable inputs 😌😌😌😌😌🙏🙏🙏🙏
@abinashkarmakar3604 жыл бұрын
Nice elaboration.. Truely super... Please do some videos on other method like conjugate beam method.. Moment area method etc... 😊😊😊
@ahmedhyd8676 жыл бұрын
Thanks , very helpful and quite easy to understand , I have one doubt...what if all support are fixed instead of roller or pin at B & C, In that case how do we proceed
@AmmarBrohi6 жыл бұрын
You are Awesome Man!
@syedsharukh33116 жыл бұрын
Your videos are awesome sir..
@lalitviramgama00164 жыл бұрын
Good work sir
@abhijeetverma28946 жыл бұрын
Excellent video on this topic
@artinnajeeb39434 жыл бұрын
You are the king Thanks alot
@krishnanshumisra6107 ай бұрын
Sir I want to ask that whether this method is elementary stiffness or system stiffness method?
@DCBAonline7 ай бұрын
Elemental stiffness method
@dishaldatta33753 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation...but can u just give the formula for finding members forces separately and thereby the BMD and SFD ?
@harshalrakhade10337 жыл бұрын
Sir, one more problem upload base on stiffness matrix plz as soon as possible ..
@VickyKumar-lu4pe Жыл бұрын
Sir,I have watched all the videos but i didn't find any question in which supports are settling.I am facing a problem in that type of questions.please upload the video for that..Thanks sir for the amazing lectures!!
@DCBAonline Жыл бұрын
In the final stiffness matrix, put the value of displacement in the displacement Matrix.
@wesamobeid46004 жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you for the clear explanation, how can I contact you? I have a question in fining weak form from governing equations of the Timoshenko beam, may be you can help me. thank you
@abinashkarmakar3604 жыл бұрын
Plizz make a video on how to solve truss problem by the help of stiffness matrix method concept..
@rinkulpatel69936 жыл бұрын
Sir plz add vdo on plane truss using member approach
@asifturabi15754 жыл бұрын
sir is there any problem of varying distributed load beam
@DCBAonline4 жыл бұрын
No, not solved, but the concept will remain same
@bikashpatra28056 жыл бұрын
Sir...I m studying mtevhbin distance...so I don't have any note,book,sir...u r everything for me
@jstan977 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful!
@YoussefCherqaoui6 жыл бұрын
When calculating the member reaction matrix Ar. The moment in the middle M=10 kNm was not included in neither members. was that a mistake? What if there is a force in the middle.
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Youssef Cherqaoui no it's not a mistake, Ar is the reaction matrix and no force is to be included in that, the moment of 10kNm has been included in Aj matrix which is a joint load matrix in which all loads on the joints have to be considered. Force in the middle means where exactly please specify joint location or beam location
@soumyakodimyala70246 жыл бұрын
why you didn't consider upward load 40kn in step:5?
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Soumya Kodimyala 40 kN is a joint load and not member load and since step 5 is pertaining to member reaction matrix it shouldn't be considered
@soumyakodimyala70246 жыл бұрын
thank you
@gamalkawy99176 жыл бұрын
GOOD JOB SIR.CAN YOU MAKE A VIDEO FOR STIFFESS METHOD FOR TRUSSES?
@syedsharukh33116 жыл бұрын
Sir plz upload stiffness method to solve pin jointed truss
@cadsyntax61403 ай бұрын
Ra = 54kN Ma= 31kN-m Rb=89.6kN Rc= 95.7kN from STAAD
@arjunatram6 жыл бұрын
where is type to link send
@santoshkotkar35036 жыл бұрын
sir ye konsi method heee- 1.structural approach or 2.member approach ???
@Virtual_Gamer11 Жыл бұрын
I have same question please ans?
@santha37737 жыл бұрын
TQ for such a good explanation
@rizwan09545 жыл бұрын
Why haven't you considered 10 kNm moment at joint B while calculating Ar2
@adamw54495 жыл бұрын
It was included in Aj as a joint load. As you end up assembling Ac from Aj and Ar it would be doubled if you included it in Aj and Ar.
@هدوءرجل-ك2غ7 жыл бұрын
pls, can be use this method for all type of beams
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
saif En yes probably all indeterminate beams
@هدوءرجل-ك2غ7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@mafnpafn3 жыл бұрын
very good!
@ManoHarika20247 жыл бұрын
Sir I applied this procedure for a fixed beam. But I didn't get answer sir. Is there any modifications, for fixed beam problems
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
seelam manohar there is no modifications you can apply it to a continuous beam, by fixed beam do you mean a single span with both ends fixed? I guess such a problem would not be solve as all the rows and columns would be deleted later, for both ends fixed you need to solve it using energy methods like castiglianos theorem or flexibility method or unit load method or moment area method etc
@ManoHarika20247 жыл бұрын
DCBA online Sir fixed beam having two spans.and eccentric loading is present on the two spans
@suhaibamin41396 жыл бұрын
sir please make a video on the analysis of space truss and space frames using direct stiffness method... i requested u some days bk also... please reply soon
@DCBAonline6 жыл бұрын
Hello, im really sorry but i am not at all getting time to prepare more lectures due to work commitments.
@suhaibamin41396 жыл бұрын
that was heart wrenching
@ajaybhuriya26937 жыл бұрын
Sir plz make video on column analogy method
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
Ajay Bhuriya i would surely try to do it in future, currently i wont be getting enough time to invest into it
@shekharkumarkeshri38207 жыл бұрын
a big thank you sir
@najaranapatel3156 жыл бұрын
sir plz upload truss sum for this method plz
@STG6226 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@bikashpatra28056 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot dude
@amrutapokharkar22647 жыл бұрын
sir pls make vidios on flexibility method in SA 2
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
AMRUTA POKHARKAR sure i will.
@civilexammaster7 жыл бұрын
Sir please send me the notes of matrix method of structure analysis for Mtec structure engg Prashant.lit@laxmi.edu.in
@animiztothepoint31565 жыл бұрын
there should be the moment at point B it cannot be zero
@PriyankaThakur-gc3km7 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot.......
@kojak200820097 жыл бұрын
There's a mistake in the solution. How come MB is zero ?!?!
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
it has to be zero since the joint is getting rotated, as it gets rotated it means it cannot give resistance to the loads hence the combined moment has to be zero at such joint, from stiffness method you get Mba + Mbc = 0 In other methods we do get values of Mba & Mbc but in those methods as well there summation leads to a zero moment. The sum is not wrong. You can check it by solving through any software you want.
@kojak200820097 жыл бұрын
DCBA online if you check it by any software it will give you the actual value of the moment at B. The correct way to get BM is by calculating the forces for each member separately
@DCBAonline7 жыл бұрын
abduallah adi yes it does but what i mentioned in my previous comment is that if you sum up moments at that joint it should give you zero and that is what you get in stiffness method, if you want the value of moment carried by member BA or BC you will have to separate them and find the moment values separately. From stiffness method if a joint is rotated you will get the value of moment as 0 since it cannot resist the rotation.
@venkatesh22855 жыл бұрын
sir I can understand that you have applied the equilibrium condition at the joint... if the two moments were added together at the joints then it will become zero to statisy the equilibrium condition. but the question is how it doesn't resist the rotation? if we consider the individual moments then it will resist corresponding to the individual span??
@venkatesh22855 жыл бұрын
+Venkatesh janakiraman if the roller support is provided at the end of the beam means then it will not resist the rotation but if the same is provided as intermediate support then it will behave like partial fixity na. I know that roller support never resist rotation and horizontal translation. kindly clarify the doubt is I am right??
@pradeepojha65206 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@bhargav18006 жыл бұрын
everything is in matrix form.....😲😲😲
@rishabh93506 жыл бұрын
This is direct stifdness method not stiffness matrix methid
@treft38533 жыл бұрын
is there is any difference ?
@DCBAonline3 жыл бұрын
They are the same
@thestructuralanalysismatri5905 жыл бұрын
send me link here
@DCBAonline5 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/j2nWi597eK9ppKM
@khalilammar25214 жыл бұрын
U FAKIN ROCK MANNN !! YOU SAVED MY ASS.... THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!