Support this channel by checking our NordVPN exclusive deal at nordvpn.com/historyvpn You can try it risk-free thanks to their 30-day money-back guarantee! Sign up for Armchair History TV today! armchairhistory.tv/ Promo code: ARMCHAIRHISTORY for 50% OFF Merchandise available at store.armchairhistory.tv/ Check out the new Armchair History TV Mobile App too! apps.apple.com/us/app/armchair-history-tv/id1514643375 play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=tv.uscreen.armchairhistorytv Discord: discord.gg/zY5jzKp Twitter: twitter.com/ArmchairHist
@ommsterlitz18052 жыл бұрын
Austerlitz when
@morisscramdoodle12202 жыл бұрын
Could you do Aspern Esserling?
@ommsterlitz18052 жыл бұрын
@@morisscramdoodle1220 It's a Statu quo battle lmao why this one instead of Leipzig. it's only significance is the loss of General Jean Lannes.
@TheEDFLegacy2 жыл бұрын
10:09 That corpse was hit so hard it flipped 180° instantly! ...kidding aside, great video! That's probably one of the very few animation mistakes I've seen in the entire time I've watched your channel, which just shows how good of a job your team has done up to this point.
@quazjexthebold2 жыл бұрын
Every war sure has a deadly part in it
@Isildun92 жыл бұрын
Out of every twelve men who marched with the Grande Armée into Russia in 1812, 1 was killed in combat, 2 became POWs (1 of which would die in captivity), 7 would die from disease, starvation, or exposure, and only 2 would make it back. That means that out of the roughly 600,000 men that marched in, only about 100,000 marched back out. Over half a million men either dead or captured, and only about 1/10 from the fighting. The fact that Napoleon managed to fight on for over a year afterwards is a major miracle of military logistics.
@thesnoopmeistersnoops51672 жыл бұрын
IMO his campaigns of 1813 and 1814, although he lost, were his most brilliant. Racing around trying to counter hopeless odds.
@МихаилТерехов-м5ц2 жыл бұрын
Не стоит забывать о партизанских движениях, от последствий которых и погибло большинство, поэтому победа над французами это не достижение наших военных, и не природных условий, это достижение всего народа, который героически сражался с оккупантами
@ИльяСапрыкин-б5е2 жыл бұрын
Oh, of course, General Frost is a favorite excuse for Europeans, from Napoleon to German Nazis, who either drown in mud or freeze to death, but this, of course, is by no means connected with the courage and valor of Russian soldiers and officers ...
@МихаилТерехов-м5ц2 жыл бұрын
@@ИльяСапрыкин-б5е сапрыга, ты вроде русский, а почемуто пишешь на английском и полную ахинею несёшь
@ИльяСапрыкин-б5е2 жыл бұрын
Everyone knows that Napoleon was defeated by England, which spent the entire war on the island and in the battle of Waterloo, where the remnants of the guards and armed peasants who had not yet frozen to death in Russia, who had to be trained to reload muskets during the battle, nevertheless defeated the remnants of Napoleon's army ...
@denorjigalaxen92302 жыл бұрын
Little correction, this is the bloodiest day in the napoleonic wars, not the bloodiest battle, the battle of Leipzig was bloodier
@margaretkairu74182 жыл бұрын
What about Jena-Austerlitz
@Opama_2 жыл бұрын
Wasn't waterloo THE bloodiest?
@TheIsemgrim2 жыл бұрын
@@Opama_ borodino had between 68 and 80k deaths waterloo had around 50k casualties. so no waterloo wasnt the bloodiest.
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
@@Opama_ Waterloo wasn't the bloodiest at all. Leipzig, Wagram, Borodino, Aspern-Essling, Eylau were bloodier. Lutzen and Bautzen were also possibly bloodier. Bodorino was by far the bloodiest day.
@denorjigalaxen92302 жыл бұрын
@@margaretkairu7418 ut was bloody but the battle of aspern, wagram and many more beats it, the large battles where brutal in the napoleonic wars
@hotampa Жыл бұрын
To clarify, the Kingdom of Wurttemberg did not supply half of the cavalry or a third of the infantry. The small german kingdom only contributed some 12k men. However, the Confenderation of the Rhine as a whole contributed 111k men. In fact, the largest foreign contingent were the Poles from the Duchy of Warsaw (around 90k men).
@HelithaGM2 жыл бұрын
"Quick, the French are taking the city. Release all these prisoners and tell them to burn it to the ground." "Well, well, Jimmy the Arsonist, you are not going to believe your luck."
@quandaledingle443 Жыл бұрын
Oversimplified reference
@Battlebricks-eb2jo9 ай бұрын
Good ol oversimplified
@snazzle97642 жыл бұрын
If anyone wants to see an amazing representation of this battle, look up "War and Peace: Part iii". With the battle scene taking 2 years by itself, it is unbelievable in it's gargantuan scale and astonishing attention to historical detail (The scene is even filmed where the actual battle took place). It remains the largest battle scene filmed in history, and I would say it's the very best portrayal of Napoleonic warfare i've ever seen.
@53gaDr34mc4st2 жыл бұрын
Sergei Bondarchuk knows his stuff, he'd make Waterloo a few years later.
@ФедорПуртов2 жыл бұрын
you are absolutely right. Sergei Bondarchuk is a great Soviet director. He was so trusted by the Soviet Ministry of Cinema that he gave him 2 divisions of soldiers as extras. This is a wonderful film based on one of the greatest books in history. Leo Tolstoy was a brilliant writer.
@ScorpoYT2 жыл бұрын
Napoleon lost more men from nature than from the fighting during his invasion of Russia
@pheonix_21962 жыл бұрын
ayyyy scorpo
@HISTORIA_MUNDI2 жыл бұрын
No
@wizbromanakajeffthejoykill76352 жыл бұрын
True, love your videos Scorpo :3
@trollege96182 жыл бұрын
Every army lost more men from diseases (nature) than fighting
@russkayaimperiya49182 жыл бұрын
The Motherland has always had the protection of mother nature herself.
@napoleonibonaparte71982 жыл бұрын
The battle that made the cannon an orchestra instrument.
@matijastanivukovic87442 жыл бұрын
@Thank me later 🅥 You are the bot.
@joshuayllanex37162 жыл бұрын
You don't say
@celston512 жыл бұрын
Wellington's Victory (Beethoven), Parade (Satie), "At the Hunt polka/Auf der Jagd" (Strauss), and others would like a word with you...
@michaelsinger46382 жыл бұрын
A Pyrrhic Victory. Napoleon held the field. But the Russian Army was not destroyed, retreated in good order, and had fought the Grand Armee to a standstill for hours. All it got Napoleon in the end was tens of thousands of dead and wounded men
@frankieseward86672 жыл бұрын
the point was to stall Napolean until winter. and they did.
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
That's not what a Phyrrhic victory is. A Pyrrhic victory is a victory where more is actually lost than gained. At Borodino, the French won the field and Moscow. They also inflicted far more losses. The campaign became a disaster because Moscow was set on fire and because Napoléon stayed one month there waiting for a Russian surrender. Kutuzov wanted to defend Moscow in another battle but had to withdraw when he learned the full scale of his losses at Borodino.
@michaelsinger46382 жыл бұрын
The victory gained him nothing in the end.
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
@@michaelsinger4638 Because he made bad decisions after
@briantarigan76852 жыл бұрын
@@lahire4943 moscow is worthless at this point, the city has been evacuated, it serves no strategic point at this time, meanwhile the Grande armee is exhausted, already lacking men and can't refill their numbers, Borodino and Moscow is a strategic lost for Napoleon, he got nothing yet lost so many, the upcoming retreat and many defeats suffered in it would be the final nail in Grande armee's coffin This is by any definition, is Phyrhiic tactical victory but a strategic loss.
@maarten11152 жыл бұрын
There is no way that Wurttemberg could have supplied 250.000 soldiers. Even the hyper militarised Prussia couldn't muster that many men.
@randomhumanbeing41822 жыл бұрын
Wurttemberg would have had to conscript 20% of the whole kingdom to get those numbers.
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
Wurttemberg supplied 12,000 soldiers. I don't know where they got their info but it's very strange. And less than 1/4 of the army was German, so that's even worse
@NicoTheGreat52 жыл бұрын
I believe he mistook wurttemberg for the entire confederation of the rhine + prussia. Wurttemberg only supplied around 30-50k men
@mabeSc2 жыл бұрын
@@randomhumanbeing4182 Yeah I was wondering why Wurttemberg did not conquer France and the rest of Germany LMFAO
@95DarkFire2 жыл бұрын
Yes! Bavaria famously had the largest army, and they supplied about 30.000 men of the VI. Korps.
@csours2 жыл бұрын
People say that General Winter defeated Napoleon. He was already defeated before winter. Winter made the defeat absolute and final.
@mexicomax772 жыл бұрын
Haven’t you watched the video ? France won at Borodino and conquered Moscow….Without that harsh winter, history would have been very different indeed.
@Cailus35422 жыл бұрын
@@mexicomax77 Winter was coming regardless. Napoleon expected that he'd just turn up at Moscow and the Csar would make peace, because that was how it was done. He never expected the Russians to burn Moscow, but even then, when it was clear that his army couldn't winter in Moscow, Napoleon hesitated for weeks. Kutuzov and the Csar outplayed Napoleon, who waited far too long in Moscow for a peace offer that would never come.
@akdele52 жыл бұрын
People claiming that winter won most wars for Russia are stupid... like in 1941 USSR *advanced* in *winter* , when defending would've been easier
@ssukhdeepkaur17832 жыл бұрын
@@mexicomax77 what won ? So what if they captured moscow ?
@ssukhdeepkaur17832 жыл бұрын
@@mexicomax77 Napoleon lost over 50% of the army before winter
@alexzandermanriquez88462 жыл бұрын
I'm sure this won't get as much attention as it rightfully deserves, but the animation quality has gotten surreal. The way the animation moves and how well drawn everything is made. I must give it to the team for putting out very good quality content. Just goes to show how much of improvement you guys have truly made over the years. Can't wait to see what you guys have to come for the rest of the channels life!
@pianoman18572 жыл бұрын
Fun fact : 0:00-1:48 this theme music comes from a famous French "chanson revancharde" (revanchist song following the defeat of 1870 Franco-Prussian War). It's called "Vous n'aurez pas l'Alsace et Lorraine". I truly appreciate these little details that make your video even better :) There is a beautiful version sung by George Thill (who was one of the greatest tenor in history) that you can listen to on KZbin!
@lulzer85002 жыл бұрын
This version of the song comes from the armchair historian's video game "fire and maneuver"
@LastBrigadier Жыл бұрын
who cares.
@jackevans1395 Жыл бұрын
@@LastBrigadierme
@Sans_Sucre_ajouté Жыл бұрын
@@LastBrigadierme
@That-Belgian-Guy2 жыл бұрын
Amazing video Griffin! The Bloodiest single day in the napoleonic wars, I love it!
@funtecstudiovideos41022 жыл бұрын
Dont forget about animators bruh
@rhysnichols86082 жыл бұрын
How was it amazing? It was riddled with inaccuracies and was vanilla af. Good animations tho
@funtecstudiovideos41022 жыл бұрын
@@rhysnichols8608 Polish troops had French skins xD
@That-Belgian-Guy2 жыл бұрын
@@rhysnichols8608 can you sum up some inaccuracies?
@rhysnichols86082 жыл бұрын
@@That-Belgian-Guy Saying 1/2 of Napoleons army was from Würtenburg was a glaring fault. That would be 25% of their whole population. Würtenberg made up 12,000 men so idk where he got 250,000 from. The entire Rhine confederation of which Würtenberg was a part gave 110,000 men. Describing Ney as a cavalry commander when he was an infantry leader Giving a very poor description of the actual reasons Napoleon invaded Russia. There are more pointed out in other comments
@celtic45182 жыл бұрын
Always like to see Napoleonic Era content!! Awesome video!!
@davitka_p2 жыл бұрын
I’m sorry but there are major inaccuracies. For example Kutuzov wrote a letter that is known throughout all Slavs who have interest in Russian history,” my tsar, I can neither claim victory nor defeat, as we (kutuzov and Napoleon) suffered deeply.” Or something along those lines.
@maxwelljw84002 жыл бұрын
“WITH THE SACRED PHRASE, MOSCOW IS BEHIND US, WE REMEMBER THE BATTLE OF BORODINO!”
@Mortablunt2 жыл бұрын
Donbass za nami, s nami Bog, Rossiya za nami, s nami Bog!
@j_don-yt48412 жыл бұрын
"And as he got older, Napoleon's tactics seemed a bit more 'run straight to the enemy, try not to die'" -Oversimplified
@olegskobelin2 жыл бұрын
Nevertheless the 1814 campaign is considered one of the most sophisticated of Napoleons actions. He managed to defend France from numerous coalition armies and make several significant defeats to the allied troops
@vermilion69662 жыл бұрын
Yes. The classic
@joewood55282 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@lambofgod22512 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing how much work was put into this video
@quintorezwalker52102 жыл бұрын
And did you know that Pytor Tchaikovsky wrote and composing the 1812 Overture that was inspired by the Russians victory over the French in 1812 during a Russian Winter that totally devastating the Grand Armee of Napoleon Bonaparte. You should listen to its iconic masterpiece and hear the cannons Boom.
@deliriouserasmus41142 жыл бұрын
This video makes some pretty bizarre claims, such as one at 3:30 that half of Napoleon's cavalry and a third of his infantry came from the German state of Wurttemberg, which was at most a second-tier member of the Confederation of the Rhine. They didn't even have their own corps in the Grande Armee, while states such as Saxony, Bavaria, and Westphalia did. Then the video refers to Michel Ney "of the French cavalry", even though Ney commanded III Corps (previously VI Corps), which consisted of infantry units. Ney hadn't directly led French cavalry since the War of the Second Coalition.
@randomhumanbeing41822 жыл бұрын
I think he confused Marshal Ney with Marshal Murat.
@thoughtfulpug13332 жыл бұрын
I also noticed this as well. I think someone on his research staff mentioned Wurttemberg as a part of the German contingent making up that percentage of the army, but someone else misreading it. As for the comment on Ney: yeah, he wasn't commanding the cavalry, that was Murat. Also wasn't a really distinguished or famous Marshal by this stage of the war, wouldn't be until the retreat from Moscow that the army considered him a legend. Think again, someone confused him for Murat, who would be a better fit to mention given how highly regarded he was by the French and the Russians as a cavalryman (the Cossacks considered capturing him and making him a member of their band). I really hope Griffin and team fix the error and reupload this.
@nickrobl2 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. Stopped watching after the Ney comment as it makes me wonder how accurate the rest of the video is. Sad because normally I like the Armchair Historians stuff.
@Macorian Жыл бұрын
It also claims that the rumour of the Russian commander "critically wounded Russian moral". Do they even realise what that means? It means Russian morale was dying. Well, it wasn't. So what use is such a statement?
@FastTquick2 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see a video of Napoleon’s finest military hour: The 1805 Battle of Austerlitz.
@preobrahzenskyii81692 жыл бұрын
Even if Napoleon had sent his Old Guard in, the assault would not have been any more successful. The Russian guard sustained all the cannon and cavalry of the French army, the infantry may have been the one to rout them, but the Russian guard were notorious for their refusal to be turned away at any cost. Even if the Russian rearguard was routed, here's your issue: Catching the remnants of the army would need breakneck speed with a tired army, and even the Old Guard would be tired after engaging the rear. Everyone knew the casualties would be tremendous, and if Napoleon did indeed throw his Guard into this all, then he wouldn't have made it out of Russia when he was given a persisting chase.
@mosesmarlboro54012 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video. Borodino, specifically the struggle for Raevskys Redoubt, is probably my favorite engagement in all of history.
@istvansipos99402 жыл бұрын
had Pyrrhus of Epirus never been born, we would call his thing a Napoleonic victory.
@titantanic72552 жыл бұрын
I have been to Borodino, it’s crazy, there are ww2 entrenchments that have been left there and it’s crazy how in the same field, you can see how the French tried to take Russia and then the Germans and both failed. The distance isn’t even that long, if it wasn’t for the smoke, napoleon and reyevsky could have actually seen each other. This kind of battle would be impossible now as either of the generals would just get sniped, napoleon was crazy to just go straight into the battle to be able to see it.
@russkayaimperiya4918 Жыл бұрын
Those days still has chivalry type of warfare, that died in the late 18th century in Europe.
@OrganicUnicorn98712 жыл бұрын
I love your content. You’re are the reason why I love learning European History. Love you keep it up 👍
@divinesausage10562 жыл бұрын
I don't know why it's emphasised so much for the Russians and not the French at the start of the video but the French infantry also consisted of mass conscripts. Napoleon would launch huge conscription drives at the start of each major offensive throughout the period to raise more and more troops.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators2 жыл бұрын
Napoleon absolutely abused conscription from a vast French population at the time.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators2 жыл бұрын
I noticed that too, these "historians' try to protect Napoleon as possible. They do not want to come to terms that Napoleon was nothing more than a goon who hijacked a powerful military from a lost and confused nation, and waged total war on Europe, ending in defeat. It does Europe no favors glorifying this, not today, not in 1938, not in 1799.
@LEMMYLEMON2 жыл бұрын
I find the napoleonic wars as the most exciting time in European history from a historic perspective. This was an amazing video. But I do not know much about early colonial times in the Australian continent. (Since I’m Australian), would be cool if you made a video covering some of those topics
@mexicomax772 жыл бұрын
Im australian too. Nothing of much interest happened down under until WW2 unfortunately. Even nowadays, we are lucky to be geographically isolated but also means not much history is produced in Oceania..
@krushnaji49402 жыл бұрын
@@mexicomax77 China is rising so you will get your history soon enough.
@bigredwolf62 жыл бұрын
I mean it was a Penal colony. So it was probably miserable. Had a few fights with the natives probably.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators2 жыл бұрын
You think that when a thug hijacks a powerful military from a lost and confused nation and wages war on Europe, that is exciting? Let me guess, you are 12 years old, right?
@COMBUSTIBLE692 жыл бұрын
Lets go! We need more Napoleonic History videos!
@korana63082 жыл бұрын
As a Russian, I would like to say thank you for doing such a great work. I might be biased but the Russian history is the most complex and interesting one , yet it is definitely under represented and even mis represented most of the times in the western culture. Thanks for doing such a great work, much appreciated👍
@craydussy2 жыл бұрын
It's definitely the most complex in my opinion
@thedon92472 жыл бұрын
I find russian history very interesting.
@Raisonnance.2 жыл бұрын
I'm french and you know. I'm fascinate with Russia. I love this country almost as I love France. Such a land of genius, pride and strength. From Poltava to Berezina until WW2. Huge.
@conserva-chan27352 жыл бұрын
Russian history is that of a country failing at everything it does and still coming out as a major power.
@conserva-chan27352 жыл бұрын
@Floron doing Germany, the Balkans, Turkey, and Italy pretty dirty there.
@chapayev67872 жыл бұрын
Funny fact: In 1789, Napoleon applied for service in the Russian army, but after learning that there were career restrictions for foreigners, he abandoned this idea.
@Thefrogking2342 жыл бұрын
Really
@mikestauffer70332 жыл бұрын
@@Thefrogking234 that sounds very unlikely
@Thefrogking2342 жыл бұрын
@@mikestauffer7033 it said it's possible but unlikely
@mikestauffer70332 жыл бұрын
@@Thefrogking234 i doubt it very much, he was boosted to join french officer college, i don't see why he would want to join the russian army, especially during the revolution, considering his name, i call it BS
@Thefrogking2342 жыл бұрын
@@mikestauffer7033 well the Russians were hiring foreign officers to fight the ottomans and he was having a tough time due to the debt when his father died which he had to take care of and the French army kept discharging him so he tried to join the Russians but as you can see they didn't let him in
@marcusguanio12902 жыл бұрын
The beginning of the video has glaring misinformation. Napoleon didn't invade Russia *solely* for the conquest of Europe, the breaking of both France and Russia of the Treaty of Tilsit did convince Napoleon that Russia is a uncommiting ally. It wasn't Ney that was famous (not until Waterloo / Eylau), but Davout. Russia was numbering around 200,000 at the start of the invasion. Napoleon lost more to hunger and heatstroke in the summer, compared to the usual banter of Russian Winter (not underestimating it! It was a huge factor of Napoleon's defeat) beating it all. But overall, a nice video!
@trollege96182 жыл бұрын
Ney wasn't that famous before the Russian Invasion, but he was very admired during the retreat from Russia. He led his corp during the retreat and escaped russian encirclement (an amazing feat considering the odds). Napoleon even called him 'The Bravest of the Braves'.
@marcusguanio12902 жыл бұрын
@@trollege9618 Yes, I completely forgot that lol. It was after the Invasion that Ney got his reputation of "The Bravest of the Brave". But it was more on Davout that is more famous during the invasion, so we're both in the right here.
@JC-mx9su2 жыл бұрын
Armchair Historian, I am learning and find it interesting to know more about History from you. -Love your videos from The Philippines.
@lukmaanpratomo68662 жыл бұрын
Preservation of force was also at play. Remember that at those times, raising & maintaining an army on campaign was expensive and given that the european mainland was under a state of perpetual war, their coffers would be running out or outright depleted. An unpaid army would could evolve into mutiny.
@bc33502 жыл бұрын
One of the few moments Napoleon went forward to see for himself what was transpiring was when he received reports from front line cmdrs that the Russians were near total collapse and required one final push to seal their fate - so it is likely that Napoleon despite his reservations seriously considered moving forward his last reserve against an enemy on verge of near total route. Quite to the contrary however, through the confused smoky haze, he saw lines of plenty Russian infantry STILL (Ney couldn't believe it either) holding their ground in good order opposite Semyonovskaya ridge. Napoleon and the French realized that it would need another day to reorganize for another assault. What they did not know, was that the Russians would totally withdraw overnight - then abandon Moscow! - and thus the great opportunity to crush the Russian main army once and for all would be lost. Had that have been known, Napoleon would have likely deployed the Guard immediately against a vulnerable point to prevent the orderly withdrawal of Russian forces as he would have nothing left to lose then. But that possibility wasn't even considered. They thought the Russians would fight to the death to very the gates of Moscow. Credit to the Russians for throwing a monkey wrench in French plans.
@audiosurfarchive2 жыл бұрын
6:48 oop, not sure if im misunderstanding or if this is an animation error; bottom most French lineinfantry icon turns into a Russian one once it reached the "most injured" state. Overall, animation has gotten insanely good since I been watching for a few years. Facial animation and minor stuff in particular.
@galatheumbreon68622 жыл бұрын
one of my favourite battles in history, it was considered by some as the beginning of the end for Napoleon's invasion
@lukaswilhelm92902 жыл бұрын
This battle gave Napoleon pain in the ass, literally as he had hemorrhoid.
@georgesamaras292211 ай бұрын
anxiety and constipation
@fearlesskillers71312 жыл бұрын
10:10 body flip 😂
@manuharter63822 жыл бұрын
I'm from Württemberg and we still got to this day many, many horse staples. Especially in the northern black forest area, like the Landkreis Freudenstadt.
@tonyhawk942 жыл бұрын
Hehe i'm French and my girlfriend is from Württenberg ! Lovely region, People and traditions ! 😍
@margaretkairu74182 жыл бұрын
I ABSOLUTELY LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!
@Pyotr_Alekseevich2 жыл бұрын
Хочу сказать, что я русский и знаю Бородинское сражение почти наизусть, и я могу сказать, что здесь есть грубая ошибка, так как на одном участке с Наполеоном было 2 армии численностью около 180.000 человек, а у Вас сказано будто больше половины миллиона. Русская армия может в те времена и достигала таких размеров, но силы которые могли оказать сопротивление Наполеону были размером в 180000 человек, именно поэтому 2 армии и отступали из-за такого огромного численного перевеса Наполеоновских войск. Однако я ещё хочу добавить, что на Бородинском поле присутствовало примерно по 150000 человек с обеих сторон
@MisanthropyFerret2 жыл бұрын
про полмиллиона никто не говорил, он поминал, что в Россию вошло 400 с чем-то тысяч. точное число войск при Бородино у него есть. и там 130 на 125 или типа того
@Pyotr_Alekseevich2 жыл бұрын
@@MisanthropyFerret я говорю не про Бородино, а про общую численность войска
@HaHaeTs Жыл бұрын
я бы ещё отметил, что не упомянут тот факт, что Москва не была столицей (и уже несколько лет как на тот момент имела меньше населения, чем Питер). здесь же мы слышим что взятие Москвы "логически" привело бы к сдаче всего и вся царём
@bernardopena16012 жыл бұрын
This is the video I was waiting for. Thank you!
@holdenhockman83402 жыл бұрын
Keep up the awesome work Griffin you're doing a damn fine job.
@koalakoom Жыл бұрын
"It ain't about how hard you hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward; how much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!” - Rocky Balboa Borodino Battle of Stalingrad Russian's ability to absorb all those damages and bounce back is crazy !!
@CivilWarWeekByWeek2 жыл бұрын
Despite the reputation Napoleon lost at Borodino I still think he was an admirable general for his conduct during it
@vinz40662 жыл бұрын
I agree (also nice to See you Here). In Most batlles that Napoleon lost He was in a Bad physical and Psychological conditon.
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
@@vinz4066 Although he won that one. In most if not all battles Napoléon lost, he was completely outnumbered. Can't do miracles.
@skiteufr2 жыл бұрын
Napoleon won at Borodino. Russians retreated.
@mexicomax772 жыл бұрын
Borodino is french victory.
@ae34642 жыл бұрын
It isn't a tactical victory since france couldnt force a overkill win
@armaansingh64662 жыл бұрын
THE quality of the animation has imporved so much keep it up 😄
@Sven735242 жыл бұрын
Lets not forget, the Cossacks main strength was harrassing french supply lines
@victorsokolov2 жыл бұрын
I'm currently reading war and peace and I'm amazed that you just uploaded this!, it's great to see Kutuzov and Bagration in action
@joanalcaraz12782 жыл бұрын
Wütenberg alone can not provide 1/3 of the infantry and half of the cavalry of a 680.000 army. The hole confederation on the Rhine did
@lahire49432 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's incredible they asserted such a thing. Württemberg contributed with 12,000 soldiers... The Confederation of the Rhine contributed with 110,000 soldiers, which is still far from 1/3 of the infantry and 1/2 of the cavalry.
@itsblitz44372 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this great video 📹! This was very informative and interesting video to talk about the Napoleonic Wars.
@russkayaimperiya49182 жыл бұрын
Napoleon: Peace rests in Moscow Alexander: Yes, eternal peace.
@vermilion69662 жыл бұрын
xD thats so bloody cold
@russkayaimperiya49182 жыл бұрын
@@vermilion6966 When he invaded it was very hot, when he was leaving he and his army was freezing to death all the way back to France though. I would know, i am a Moscow native. )
@smal750 Жыл бұрын
@@russkayaimperiya4918 I wonder how napoleon wouldve redrawn your country if you didnt keep retreating until general winter arrived
@russkayaimperiya4918 Жыл бұрын
@@smal750 All i have to say is two Russian proverbs: “A man who threatens with the sword will die by the sword.” And “A Russian can only control Russia, as Russia is already impossible to rule by a Russian himself.”
@krips222 жыл бұрын
Borodino might have been the last "triumph" of Napoleon, but there were still impressive victories ahead, for instance: The 6 days campaign in 1814: ~30 k French VS ~50-56 k Prusso-russians led by Blücher. French victory (despite MANY unexperienced very young conscripts). Napoleon inflicted an important amount of casualties to his opponents while losing only minimal casualties himself (the Prusso-russians had between 6 and 10 times more casualties than the French). -- Battle of Dresden in 1813: ~100,000 French (w/ a few Saxons) VS ~200,000 Austrians, Russians and Prussians. Result: French victory etc....
@robnixon88322 жыл бұрын
I love finding comments like this. It’s so easy to forget about the remaining battles of the napoleonic wars. Too many people just think Borodino, retreat, exile then Waterloo!
@vivelesourspolaires3342 жыл бұрын
@@robnixon8832 And there's also just before Waterloo, Quatre-bras won by Ney against Wellington, ans Ligny, led by Napoleon against Blücher and that almost reverse the cours of the war because Blücher fell from his horse and it was only luck that the french cavalry didn't found him under his dead horse. In fact, in the whole campagne of Belgium, only Waterloo was a defeat, thanks for the intervention of Blücher and the determination of Wellesley to hold the line.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators2 жыл бұрын
Wrong, because both campaigns in 1813 and 1814 ended in total DEFEAT! There was nothing brilliant about the 6 Day Campaign when Napoleon foolishly went on the offensive and was out of position to defend Paris, that fell easily to the coalition. Nor the campaign in 1813 where Napoleon was trapped and smashed at Leipzig. Both campaigns were utter failures by Napoleon. It is no coincidence that as the French military got weaker, Napoleon did not look as "brilliant" anymore. Especially after Borodino, which was the point in time the French military became second-rate. And if you look at the retreat from Russia, the Leizpig Campaign, 1814 France, and the Waterloo Campaign, you will see four of the most poorly led campaigns in the history of warfare. If history was being honest, people would see that Napoleon had four consecutive terrible losing campaigns, four straight years as the French army was second-rate. It is clear that those early military successes France had more to do with the might of the French military, in spite of Napoleon. Even the French Revolutionary Wars ended in victory. And in the case of the War of Second Coalition, in spite of Napoleon, not because of him. Not with the disaster at Egypt and the near disaster at Marengo.
@krips222 жыл бұрын
to Hazel Mel: _"both campaigns in 1813 and 1814 ended in total DEFEAT!"_ I said: _"there were still impressive victories ahead"_ . How amazing victories in battles won against all odds couldn't qualify as "victories" will remain a mystery. You just needed a pretext to spew your venom. _"There was nothing brilliant about the 6 Day Campaign"_ You're funny. Somehow you missed the fact that the French tiny "army" was totally outnumbered and somehow miraculously trounced the Russo-Prussian army, inflicting to it an (literally) incredible number of casualties. It was a desparate attempt and there was nothing to expect except defeat. It was nothing short of a miracle that Napoleon and his young unexperienced little army was able to to do anything at all - let alone ridiculizing his mighty opponent. He should have been smashed right away. You're an extremely dishonest and biased individual. _"was out of position to defend Paris, that fell easily to the coalition"_ There was nothing to do to win. And somehow the tiny army defending Paris managed to inflict way more casualties to the huge coalition army attacking it, before having to surrender. _"Nor the campaign in 1813 where Napoleon was trapped and smashed at Leipzig"_ This tend to happen when you're so much outnumbered - a fact that you couldn't ignore. The manpower of France was reduced by ~ one GENERATION of constant wars (1792-1813 (1815 in total)). France was exhausted on account on fighting the major powers of Europe for so long and had to rely more and more on unexperienced very young conscripts. The quality was bound to decrease and yet Napoleon still managed to win impressive victories, somehow. I wonder from which country with such a fantastic military history you are - that you can allow yourself to (try to) belittle such impressive achievements.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators2 жыл бұрын
@@krips22 Both 1813 Germany and 1814 France were pathetic military campaigns by Napoleon, which followed up the disastrous 1812 Russia campaign. And you want to defend that, what a disgrace...... The way Napoleon got smashed at Leipzig was way harder than any smashing Napoleon ever did, by far. But you want to be dishonest and tell only half the story, and you do not mention that whatever Napoleon did in 1813 Germany led to him getting trapped and smashed at Leipzig as Napoleon wasted away another entire French army, his second in two years in 1812 and 1813. In 1814 France, you want to give Napoleon credit for taking MEANINGLESS pawns in the Six Days Campaign, and getting himself out of position as Napoleon foolishly went on the offensive and lost Paris easily, checkmate Napoleon, your king Paris was taken while you went after meaningless pawns.. So bad was Napoleon's incompetence in 1814 France, that his own Marshalls fired him for incompetence as Paris fell. But you don't want to mention that, you want to make it seem like Napoleon was "brilliant" in the Six Days Campaign when it was a counter-productive, meaningless, waste of time and resources offensive campaign that ended in Napoleon being dismissed by his own Marshalls as Paris fell easily. And for the last time, stop ignoring the pathetic military results, which absolutely matter. In fact, results are the most important part of any war. When foreign troops capture your capital, occupy your territory after you ran your powerful military off a cliff like Napoleon, those are garbage military results.
@francescodechirico72362 жыл бұрын
Awesome video as always, although I'd like to point out two minor inaccuracies: - at 4:40 it almost sounds as if the armies that met at Borodino were significantly smaller than they were at the start of the invasion due to casualties, whereas in reality this was mostly due to the fact that the French advance went on various fronts, not just towards Moscow, and that the French had to use a considerable number of soldiers to protect their long supply line. The Russians had to deploy their own army accordingly. - at 17:12 you mention that the Grand Armee "wintered" in Moscow, although Napoleon left Moscow as early as October 19, due to the fact that the city was in rubbles and it couldn't sustain his army. Napoleon was desperately seeking a decisive victory against the Russians before winter, because he knew he was running out of supplies. When he couldn't, he had no other choice other than withdrawing as winter approached.
@lordbeaverhistory Жыл бұрын
yes, they were smaller due to casualties. The hot summer, exhaustion and typhus had by that point killed about 60% of the original invading force. The other fronts, mainly the Corps of Saint-Cyr, Macdonald, Reynier and Schwarzenberg amounted to less then 100,000 men
@fatmakaya5669 Жыл бұрын
Please do more napoleonic war videos like austerlitz,Waterloo,jena and Leipzig
@randomhumanbeing41822 жыл бұрын
Overall this was a good video, but there's one thing that has been bothering me, you said the Kingdom of Wurttemberg's troops made up 1/2 of his cavalry and 1/3 of his infantry, which is not true at all. In fact the entire Wurttemberg contingent amounted to no more than 12,000 men and the entirety of the Grande Armee's contingent of ethnic Germans no more than 151,000 of his 680,000.
@макслюлюкин2 жыл бұрын
well, there were Spaniards and Dutch, Italians and Swiss, almost the whole of Europe
@Acetilcystein2 жыл бұрын
Mom once took me to Borodino for couple of days to visit recreation of events and walk around rhe place. There are still remains of fortifications left there, although obviously, very damaged after 200 years.
@andrzejszklony17412 жыл бұрын
You could mention about Poles in the begging French force. In Napoleon Grand Army marching into Russia was 100 000 polish solder. V korp of the Napoleon army was sometimes named polish,and was under command of great polish Commander prince Josef Poniatowski. He fought on się of Napoleon to his death in" battle of nation".
@lordbeaverhistory Жыл бұрын
fun fact: There were 2 purely polish corps at the start of the invasion of russia
@annoyedbrox48512 жыл бұрын
Your Channel is my favourite history channel
@LitD2 жыл бұрын
Most often cited numbers of the Grande Armee: 300 thousand French (including conscripts from annexed territories) 108 thousand Poles (Duchy of Warsaw, Imperial Guard, Legions and fresh recruits from Russian occupied Poland) 112 thousand from the Confederation of the Rhine (12 thousand from Wurttemburg) 27 thousand Italians 8 - 16 thousand Swiss 4 thousand Spanish 2 thousand Portugal 8-10 thousand "Illyrians" (modern Slovenia, Croatia) 20 thousand from Prussia 35 thousand "Austrians" (about 2/3 were from occupied nations) There is ofcourse debate about the exact numbers but those are the most often listed that I found.
@xmaniac992 жыл бұрын
Join the grand armee and see the world they said, all I found was my grave.
@tianhaoju46342 жыл бұрын
Borodino was one of the most significant battles of the Russian imperial era, the USSR march "we are the army of the people" featured the notation of its chorus
@JACK....27882 жыл бұрын
Good video. Could you make a video about the battle of the Hürtgen forest please?
@henriksandstrom21612 жыл бұрын
We need more napoleonic videos please love the animation and the narrator
@Again-idk2 жыл бұрын
A Armchair Historian upload on my birthday! Brightens my day a bit after over half my friend forgot about it EDIT: thx guys!
@jontaedouglas72442 жыл бұрын
Happy birthday fellow virgoat 🐐🥳💜
@vinz40662 жыл бұрын
Happy Birthday
@AlecuBeldiman684202 жыл бұрын
Happy birthday!
@oswaldboelcke5470 Жыл бұрын
This is a great video. Well done.
@loyalpiper2 жыл бұрын
If you want a good series on this battle with a top down view. Watch epic histories Russia campaign.
@luismonterroso35812 жыл бұрын
I reallly like this type of videos, I hope you keeping this high quality videos. :D
@George_J_Rambo2 жыл бұрын
You mentioned the background of Barclay but completely ignored the fact that Bagrationi was a Georgian general.
@SirHector19992 жыл бұрын
Please more napoleonic videos! Great work yet again!
@historylover73552 жыл бұрын
I think you should've mentioned that bagration wounds were mortal and would later die a couple weeks later. Could've also showed the famous painting.
@gabrieleternullo83072 жыл бұрын
Can you do the evolution of Italian uniforms?
@shadowedshades55282 жыл бұрын
Here's a good idea for a video: What was Japan like during the Cold War?
@logycaa2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful episode, and nice BGM choice👌
@Henri.d.Olivoir2 жыл бұрын
I hope we can see more of the Napoleonic Wars soon!
@kobenini1232 жыл бұрын
YOOOO, I've been waiting for this.
@colmcmillan1732 жыл бұрын
The French did not winter in Moscow. They left her before the onset of winter
@sorrynothing.2 жыл бұрын
"Hey lads! Is Moscow not behind us? By Moscow then we die As have our brethren died before!" Mikhsil Lermontov "Borodino"
@iron45172 жыл бұрын
this was a very intense battle
@EmilSosnin Жыл бұрын
Pollacks, Frogs, Krauts, now Burgers. They never learn.
@mohammadyeasinkhan68852 жыл бұрын
I have a interesting theory that Napoleon did not take Davout's advice on a flanking manuever because he was psychologically affected and unnerved to crush the Russians while they are weak, he was partially right to not authorize a monumental flanking manuever until the Russian reserve divisions have been deployed. But I am interested to see what would have happened if the flanking plan had gone into affect, with Ney and Murat pinning down the bulk of the Russian units sent to outmanuever the flankers.
@olegskobelin2 жыл бұрын
It would be difficult for large French forces to break through rough terrain of the Utitsa forest without being noted by Russians. In this case it is likely that Kutuzov would retreat from the battle field another time
@napoleoncorneliusscipio51412 жыл бұрын
Napoleon was a master, thus he had good reason to analyze and ultimately decide against Davout's flanking plan. Maneuvers are not that easy. They were already DEPLOYED at Borodino, and to maneuver at such a scale would be very hard to keep a secret. It wasn't like at Ulm, or at Austerlitz where the Allies were aggressive. And the Russians have reserves to match Davout's maneuver. A frontal attack was logical to Napoleon - the Grand Armee had superior artillery, plenty of infantry and cavalry, and he was confident they matched the Russians. And so, the battle of Moskova was bloody.
@bc33502 жыл бұрын
@@napoleoncorneliusscipio5141 I agree, good luck trying to move 50k worth of troops through thick woods and ravines. Perfect targets for sharpshooters and skirmishers as well. His best chance i think would have been to skirmish in front of the Redoubt and Fleches while simultaneously sending a huge column in between the two fortifications with the hope of cracking the center as he had so many times before.
@monkepotato38972 жыл бұрын
14:53 "Bitter melee has indeed"
@kiberburjui96082 жыл бұрын
600.000 at the beginning and only 30.000 got back
@lordbeaverhistory2 жыл бұрын
More about 100,000, many garrisons survived, also his far away flanks, but those saw little fighting
@briantarigan76852 жыл бұрын
Tactical win for Napoleon, strategic defeats for him
@Xenogamer18712 жыл бұрын
I love the Nepolionic wars!
@oliversherman24142 жыл бұрын
I love your channel keep up the great stuff!
@TheNewdawn1st2 жыл бұрын
Great animation work but I just couldn't help laughing at 10:08 when the dead body magically flipped around
@jodiefostersarmy33062 жыл бұрын
I went to highschool with Griffen Johnson, the guy was always such a creep. He followed my little sister in the bathroom one time and almost got expelled. Ive got the restraining order and everything to prove it. Strange hes making history videos now.
@tonygriggle55692 жыл бұрын
Show me the proof.
@LeoTheJust2 жыл бұрын
ok bro
@mikestauffer70332 жыл бұрын
he does look like a creepy wuss
@oliversherman24142 жыл бұрын
Keep up the great stuff
@IronDragon-21432 жыл бұрын
Any chance we can get a video on the Sack of Rome in 1527? I'd love to see a video on the Last Stand of the Swiss Guard.
@mohammadjavadamoa95732 жыл бұрын
Nice job
@artemartem5402 жыл бұрын
You missed so much about why Russian high command let Moscow be taken and next manuvers that Kutuzov did and also I don't believe that Kutuzov was far away from a fight he positions his headquarters that way that he can see the battle
@finncoughlin5670 Жыл бұрын
This helped me get an A on a Borodino presentation in a History class👍
@heikomoller23642 жыл бұрын
the music at the begining is too loud. i had trouble understanding you. Also the animation/maps are confusing, they lack the overall view / picture. Just my 2 cents. Love the channel. :)
@bidyarnovhazarika4942 жыл бұрын
Will like to see Battle of Austrelitz : Napoleon's finest victory
@CrimzonVolt2 жыл бұрын
Man I’d love to see this channel do a video about Squadron 201 (Aztec Eagles)
@HelithaGM2 жыл бұрын
Then, it got cold, stupid cold.
@oliversherman24142 жыл бұрын
I love your channel keep up the great stuff
@kobeslaughter46712 жыл бұрын
"Good luck killing the Russian bear in its den of snow and bones." Some guy... probably