When your actions disgust a man as Vicious and Ruthless as Mr. Hearst, you know you done goofed!
@karynsuepohlmeier21093 жыл бұрын
Exactly!!
@JavMacHer3 жыл бұрын
Whoopsie daisy!
@A427-w2v3 жыл бұрын
Damn good point.
@tycrane25392 жыл бұрын
i always felt he was more disgusted at how bad it would make their association look.
@ALD562 жыл бұрын
I don't think Hearst was so much disgusted by Wolcott's actions as concerned about how they would affect his bottom line if they were discovered.
@jamietodd25603 жыл бұрын
When Hearst asks if some spirit overtakes him, you can see that Wolcott sees the out Hearst is offering, and it looks like he almost might take it. But instead he says a definite "No." He is in control and knows exactly what he's doing when he kills.
@PlayNiceFolks3 жыл бұрын
Why, tho
@Loonaticx3 жыл бұрын
@@PlayNiceFolks Wolcott was a very decisive psychopath as presented here. Though he may show what resembles a personal issue therein when confronted of it, his nature to fall into it is like that of a reflex because it IS his nature.
@tamnaissixkiller84452 жыл бұрын
@@PlayNiceFolks why does he know what he's doing? because he's sane. why does he kill? i'm tempted to keep an eye on for another year to see if some idiot actually tries to answer that question.
@trevscribbles Жыл бұрын
@@tamnaissixkiller8445 The mind is a misunderstood spectrum. We could consider it a blend of psychopathy mixed with a perfect storm of bipolar disorder, but the fact remains that he was simply written to do so.
@gregscrabshack2307 Жыл бұрын
@@PlayNiceFolksits bread into humans(some)
@timothybutler33234 жыл бұрын
I love the way hearst backs away from wolcotts asking if he ever considered why he was writing the letter
@drobinson-uo7ic2 жыл бұрын
That "Well!" was so powerful
@jposensei Жыл бұрын
2 of the most memorable characters on a show that's full of memorable characters.
@davidsheppard98823 жыл бұрын
How many people have not recognized Wolcott as the same actor as Hickcocks murderer? I was stunned when I noticed…..this man is an actor.
@liamwake15832 жыл бұрын
Holy moly, can’t believe I didn’t notice that! Credit to the actor in that case🍻
@jsnrvst2 жыл бұрын
He is a chameleon. He also makes a cameo in the movie in the scene where a mob attacks Hearst.
@Scooter6x32 жыл бұрын
Crap! Great pull!!!
@johnclavis Жыл бұрын
He also plays the horse that kicks Steve the Racist Drunk in the head. The man is a genius.
@jimmaculate5 Жыл бұрын
"Wild Bill, u one for one"!
@Dr3amtime4 жыл бұрын
Still can't tell to what extent Hearst is morally appalled (he still has morals?) and to what extent he's just offended at the thought of his own degree of risk and exposure by way of association.
@matthewriley78263 жыл бұрын
Yep not about morals.He’s more concerned that he was sloppy enough to get caught. Different in Mexico though, easier to sweep it under the rug.
@ZCherish3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I think he's more concerned about his own liability in a town in which he is trying to establish himself as the domineering power, and this could have been a big weakness.
@radioactivehalfrhyme2 жыл бұрын
The early episodes of Season 3 show that Hearst has impulses almost as horrific as Wolcott’s. The only difference is that he possesses enough self-control not to act on them when it’s against his material interests.
@harveywallbanger3123 Жыл бұрын
His tone speaks volumes. He corrects himself and drops his tone slightly when he clarifies that the women Wolcott killed were not "women" per se, just "prostitutes". He's throwing Wolcott a bone, admitted he's not primarily angry about that. The real kicker is that Tolliver "disposed of the bodies for you". A shockingly stupid weakness which has now put Tolliver in a position to extort Hearst. Just saying it out loud makes Hearst enraged. His primary lieutenant has failed him. "We must end our connection" is pure business. He's not mad, he's just disappointed. The actual hookers are irrelevant to him.
@Cuchulainn1984 Жыл бұрын
@@radioactivehalfrhymeI feel like season 2 Hearst and season 3 Hearst are different characters. Hearst in season 3 is clearly a stand-in for HBO execs who cancelled the show and is a pure monster.
@bluestarindustrialarts77124 жыл бұрын
Wolcott was good. Same actor that killed Wild Bill. Brilliant acting of 2 different characters in the series.
@Dr3amtime4 жыл бұрын
I did not know that. Impressive.
@charleshemphill69234 жыл бұрын
I never noticed that lol awesome
@pjk90564 жыл бұрын
Until halfway through 2nd season I thought Wolcott was the brother of the actor who killed Wild Bill.
@plastichouseplant4 жыл бұрын
He was also an extra in the movie. He was the guy who shouted "I hope you die in the street like my dad!" near the end.
@ckapop3 жыл бұрын
@@plastichouseplant I was going to say the same thing!
@abird82543 жыл бұрын
He was the "Jack the Ripper" of Deadwood.
@Kevlexicon Жыл бұрын
such a great deconstruction of "luck"
@gary5876 жыл бұрын
WELL?!
@ianmangham45702 жыл бұрын
😳
@johansmallberries98745 жыл бұрын
What's extra sad is that the poor girls were just disposed of. Probably buried in the woods, bringing them to Wus pigs would've been too high profile.
@lolhowmad4 жыл бұрын
Tolliver didn't give them to the Pigs because he wanted to use the bodies as leverage against Wolcott. To blackmail him. If he gave the bodies to the pigs he wouldn't have any evidence of the murders.
@danielburgess77852 жыл бұрын
Even Hearst has his bright lines.
@kevinjones96852 жыл бұрын
An incredibly intense scene that reveals the genius of David Milch
@gasser50012 жыл бұрын
Remember, folks... he played Jack AND Francis. I didn't even know until the 3rd playthru.
@orionion Жыл бұрын
Hearst is visibly upset by these news, even though he's not exactly a saint himself. It's the Jungian Shadow: we hate in others the qualities that we don't want to accept in ourselves. Hearst is uncomfortably reminded that the drive, which makes him want to rape Mrs. Garret and shoot at her through the thoroughfare, is the very same that makes Wolcott murder women. Wolcott just has less self-control.
@lproof84723 жыл бұрын
Hearst is the greatest villain in TV show history.
@silversnail14133 жыл бұрын
Too bad the movie ruined him by reducing him to a cartoon character.
@walterbrob3 жыл бұрын
They really softened Swearengen up way too much the movie also
@Chlorine_Gas Жыл бұрын
@@walterbrobwell he was sick
@StandInTheFire Жыл бұрын
1:44 chills
@ernesttenesmus6757 Жыл бұрын
1:31 Agreed.
@nikosgreek352 Жыл бұрын
I do not believe that it is a coincidence that Hearst's men are all of a certain nature. Wolcott, the Captain.....He employed others of course like the Pinkertons and his servants but these two he was close to. Like calls to like and a Wolf picks wolves for his lieutenants. I dont think its even fully concious. There was no discussion about what they were willing and unwilling to do. I think that when he met them he instinctively understood that they were of his tribe, whatever name you wanna give it, and he took them under his wing. All three of them give off a certain vibe. They have....certain tendencies and ways of thinking. Hearst is the King, the Captain his general, Wolcott his chief diplomat. But all belong to the same kingdom. Even Mr Lee shares these same tendencies even though he is not as close to Hearst as the others. The way Lee treated his whores immediately showed how different he was to Wu. Wu can be ruthless but its out of necessity. At his core he is an honorable man. Lee on the other hand has no better nature. He is of a different tribe. Hearst's tribe and all that implies.
@TheBlastOfficial-nu3zb Жыл бұрын
Fantastically put.
@lennarthagen3638 Жыл бұрын
It happened in Mexico and now its happened here.
@sirlawrencet2 жыл бұрын
Greatest show ever.
@zachsalvatore5175 Жыл бұрын
I really think it is
@JustSomeCanadianGuy Жыл бұрын
He looks a lot like John Cleese! 😃
@jesussalas24074 ай бұрын
If Wolcott was a wealthy and well skilled geologist and he was to receive severance pay from Hearst why did he hang himself? Couldn’t he find work elsewhere?
@tob77593 ай бұрын
He only wanted to work for Hearst. And we saw him suicidal previously in the season aswell, when he is shaving and he puts the razor to his neck.
@turniorarroyo1405Ай бұрын
Hearst liked Wolcott alot as a friend!!!!! More like a brother. Sucked seeing them split up,as evil they were. Both good & evil split(friend wise).Just sucks that Hearst & Francis were on the bad End...
@LawsMusic1082 жыл бұрын
lol like hearst is any better
@sweetcell8767 Жыл бұрын
What a scene. Incredible 🙀😿
@Losrandir Жыл бұрын
0:43 "WOW!!!" This is what Hearst does when he's actually impressed by someone. Doesn't happen often.
@itsgodnga11 ай бұрын
WELL* lol
5 жыл бұрын
People bang on about how evil Hearst is, and he is a bit of a cunt, but he's genuinely horrified and disturbed at Wolcott's psychopathy. "To me, there is no sin . . . . " and you kinda expect him to qualify that with "So great" or "So heinous". But he doesn't. "To me, there is no sin.". That really gave Hearst the wire spider.
@johansmallberries98745 жыл бұрын
It's killing without purpose, there's no angle to it, so even Hearst can't wrap his head around it.
@toadvine79525 күн бұрын
Hearst is greedy and rich. "To me, there is no sin" is the same way he feels about his actions. That's why he worked with Wolcott.
@Skankhunt42867 Жыл бұрын
So did Hearst have Wolcott kill himself in this scene? When he told him to make a severance?
@redadamearth Жыл бұрын
No, a "severance", meaning just to separate from him in relationship, both business and personal.
@itsgodnga11 ай бұрын
hes referring to severance pay
@BlackDalhia72 жыл бұрын
Is that the guy from Simon and Simon?
@peteroliphant72892 жыл бұрын
yes
@ianmangham45702 жыл бұрын
WELL!😀
@jimmykray95832 жыл бұрын
Why did he kill them anyway? Did he get some kind of pleasure out of it or what?
@peteroliphant72892 жыл бұрын
yes... today Wolcott would be called a serial killer who preys on prostitutes... killing them is part of his sexual perversion.... but if we are to believe Wolcott... he only indulged in it twice... but one of those times was in Deadwood and quite recent (we see it happen in the season)...
@ariadneschild84602 жыл бұрын
I don't think he was able to perform and killing them keeps his secret.
@jamesmiller9515 Жыл бұрын
Killing them might be the only way he could "get off"?@@ariadneschild8460
@redadamearth Жыл бұрын
He was a psychopathic killer and a sociopath. Why does any serial killer kill? A host of reasons.
@erronblack-ig1zn5 жыл бұрын
Best two characters in the show
@sidviscious105 жыл бұрын
certainly the most darkest
@jimmykray95834 жыл бұрын
these 2 would be way down on the list for me which just goes to show how amazing the show was when even with these 2 both down on the list they were still both amazing characters
@rodneystorick64533 жыл бұрын
Not even close, the best
@CGCampbellJr6 жыл бұрын
Listen to the little sound Wolcott uses in the end of the scene.... he's Sheldon Cooper's great great grand-dad... :p
@freemason4979 Жыл бұрын
I always empathized strongly with Hearst. He was the only one that saw the big picture i.e. capitalism / free markets and the efficiencies and prosperity it promised. That vision, which forced him down his path, made him outcast amongst his fellow humans, which off course, were the biggest beneficiaries off his sacrifice.
@Onigirli Жыл бұрын
Empathized... with Hearst? o_o Or aspects of him in season 2?
@tycrane25392 жыл бұрын
Well!!!?!?!?
@MrLilfee7 жыл бұрын
i felt so bad for Wolcott in this scene...
@mosspally69957 жыл бұрын
MrLilfee he...he’s a serial killer of women...
@carlrs156 жыл бұрын
yeah...looking for excuses, for some sort of absolution, even at the end every man's mind was their own province back then...and their sole responsibility. disordered men, like Wolcott, had no place in the world, unless (a) they were able to effectively mask their urges, or (b) they were useful to someone powerful like Hearst "it happened in Mexico;" as if these circumstances just fell into his lap. Brilliant writing from Milch, but in the service of depicting Wolcott as, at bottom, what he was - an empty shell, without even the conviction to be honest about it
6 жыл бұрын
Today he is a producer in Hollywood and self-identified "male feminist"
@jrodriguez21336 жыл бұрын
@@EthanAnthony907 lobo
@thomasblock11646 жыл бұрын
@@EthanAnthony907 It is all in how we define things, just as Walcott defined himself in ways he found complimentary. What is the claim? "I fight for gender equality." One could take great claim in being an abolitionist in 1850. There would have been peril associated with that stance in some circles and none in others. Today, however, to make that declaration would seem to be rather insipid. Pointless. There are some localized examples of slavery, most human trafficking, and when they are cracked down upon, democrats protest. Ice raids a under age brothel in Oakland and democrats protest in front of the house. The border patrol demands some proof that men really are the fathers of girls they bring across the border and democrats protest. California, completely run by democrats, pass a law making it illegal to arrest an underage prostitute and claim virtue. They assert that having prostitution on their juvenile record would be harmful to them later in life. As opposed to actual juvenile prostitution? Juvenile records are sealed. It certainly seems that availability has been legislated. In today's world, feminism is just another power arc utilized by the Democrat party, by every metric, women have at the least equal rights, and in some cases extraordinary rights. I'm not Mra or mgtow or any other identitarian "specialist." Just a regular guy who has seen enough to know when the public is being propagandized. I wonder if you might consider how much you have been influenced. If you have read to this point, thanks. Have a great 2019.
@julianmarsh13783 жыл бұрын
This would have been a great series except the dialog is so bogus...nobody in the late 1800s spoke like the characters do in this series. They took such great pains to look authentic and then blow it on the dialog.
@andrewvelonis59403 жыл бұрын
That has been my impression also, but I don't know how anybody spoke in the late 1800s.
@Matt-pc5cd3 жыл бұрын
Deadwoods dialogue is the thing that more than anything else sets the show apart and above most other shows. And it's at its best when it's at its most bogus.
@julianmarsh13783 жыл бұрын
@@Matt-pc5cd It is just a pet peeve of mine, explaining too why I don't much care for Shakespeare's tragedies...not so much the style as the fact no one would have those thoughts...imagine an illiterate chief like Macbeth saying, "All the world's a stage...".