and they say that we don't have quality equipments
@usar7249Күн бұрын
Who says?
@CarnageXAddy388zКүн бұрын
Jhaatu angrez for a reason
@User91272Күн бұрын
Poopistanis khete hai 😢@@usar7249
@abhilashyadav2274Күн бұрын
name a few of yours.
@adied_2001Күн бұрын
Western nations have same similar thoughts for russian,indian and chinese made equipments... @@usar7249
@Breath300Күн бұрын
Carles de Gaulle is the best aircraft carrier outside the us super carriers
@LMessii1023 сағат бұрын
Absolutely
@SinghOm_Indian0723 сағат бұрын
NO DOUBT
@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em22 сағат бұрын
Ya
@yugalysk339518 сағат бұрын
Charles de Gaulle : Chota pack bada punch.
@Karan.j.s-999-t9q14 сағат бұрын
Why ? Plz can Anyone explain ?
@anapurba90322 сағат бұрын
Royal navy ❌ Lau*a Navy ✅
@Ironhide234Күн бұрын
Isse ache to hamare aircraft carriers hai stobar hai par active duty pe rhete hai na ki maintaince pe
@kaustubhchoudhary3463Күн бұрын
Meanwhile Russians operating their Kabad khana (Kuznetsov) since last 40 years - First time ? 😎
@onlinetricksandtips9613Күн бұрын
Russia doesn't need an aircraft carrier They have a large number of submarines.
@cibertron486023 сағат бұрын
Hope our vikrant not faces same sinario
@axel66523 сағат бұрын
Kuzentsov is old and. Faulty
@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em22 сағат бұрын
@@axel665 really it's so shitty
@chakraborty198922 сағат бұрын
@@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em it has issues related to breaking up of USSR. When it left Sebastopol for the last time to join Russian navy, defying Ukranian order to stay anchored in the mentioned port, it was like 90-95% complete. Back then Russia has no port that has experience with carriers and Ukraine refused to help on finishing the kuznetsov. Russia somehow finished the project but it's was forever crippled.
@ashishbabu1617Күн бұрын
MRFA: Can't take off every time.
@arpitraj884223 сағат бұрын
They could have made it a CATOBAR carrier, and should have invested on making Eurofighter, as a carrier capable fighter instead of F-35B or they could just have purchased the F-18s from Boeing, but all they did was choosing the worst option available to them 😅
@tejasahuja621823 сағат бұрын
It's more like they did what US told them to do
@marcd519615 сағат бұрын
they could have made it into a CATOBAR if they went for 1 carrier., not 2. Maybe made it a bit smaller. But they wanted to show to the world "We have 2 Supercarriers". Uk is all about bloating and being fake. "Great" Britain "Royal" armed forces "Super" Carriers.
@Muhammad_Lenin_Thomas20 сағат бұрын
In British Empire aircraft everytime sunks.
@yashansh831722 сағат бұрын
And they say , they will go for war with Russia 😅
@bramha9680Күн бұрын
Lots of lessons for us, we need to focus more on missiles like the LR-AShM and SSNs instead of obsessing over white elephant projects
@futureprenur9594Күн бұрын
Am sure Indian Navy knows Lott more about ac than other countries and also the type of equipment what we use including defensive missiles
@md.sarmadraza23 сағат бұрын
In missile technology things are going well but focus shouldbe onSubmarines. Most effective platform is Submarine in naval war and we are lacking in numbers of submarines
@ndeepanshu654123 сағат бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza throw some net and the submarine fails.
@bramha968023 сағат бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza I agree, a large Nuclear attack submarine fleet makes the most sense for India, the recent approval of two SSNs is a step in the right direction but a lot more needs to be done
@futureprenur959423 сағат бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza need more budgets we got very capable asw capabilities as well but yes submarines are also needed but we need a larger ac fleet also for power projection and domination of Indian Ocean along side 8-10 ssn 21 scorpene and other normal class submarines and few ssgn and a fleet of 4-5 supercarrier and 10-12 next gen destroyer along with 5-6 cruiser class ships and 20 more frigates which bigger more powerful than latest class what we have
@mrahulkeya814223 сағат бұрын
Keyboard warriors incoming! 1,2,3..
@Mr.A38623 сағат бұрын
5:40 cost effective aur cheap dekhte dekhte hi hamare pas khud kuch achhi tech nahin hai
@reallyliberal265522 сағат бұрын
How?
@Mr.A38622 сағат бұрын
@reallyliberal2655 ab agar ye le lenge to atleast 20 years k baad jab ye retire hoga tab hi aise aircraft carriers khud banane ki sochenge not now or inbetween
@riderpraniz394421 сағат бұрын
Sahi kaha vai apna hi sirf acha dekhta hai defence matrix baki ka sirf kabar😂
@nikunjthakkar480921 сағат бұрын
Time ke hisab se socho 10 saal baad milna aur abhi 2 saal mein milna ...
@reallyliberal265521 сағат бұрын
@@Mr.A386 nai nai I'm asking ki tune jo likha hai " yeh cheap dekhte dekhte hi hamara pass kuch achi tech nai hai " yeh kya soch ke likha bhai? Hum itna bhi Vella nai hai ki acha tech nai hai hamara pass
@mxuqfoks20 сағат бұрын
Yes carriers are white elephant for any country. It is also true carriers carry huge fleets of arms ammunitions etc loaded with next level technologies. With advancements in radars missile technology and satellites these carriers become sitting duck and loss of these carriers will be nightmare for any country as carriers cost is very high and complexity involved in building these. we should be working on submarines. Later 2 big carriers for patrolling, 3 mini carriers for protecting islands.
@ap867223 сағат бұрын
Df17 sabhi aircraft carrier ke liye challenge he !
@senbagamuthurahul-2746Күн бұрын
Better they sell one to India😁 as Repartition from colonization
@knowledged842022 сағат бұрын
Pehle India ka kudka carrier koi kobra che kom nahi hai lekin India phitorot Batu mae Bora hai
@P-S-N.12319 сағат бұрын
CATOBAR hota EMALS ke saath tho fir bhi soch sakte the, modify karna jyada problem ho sakta hein, bhale hi sasta lage
@shankarnarayanbharati526710 сағат бұрын
Ja ja chini dalal nijer chorkay tel de. Tor choti pishi re ready thakte ko, 2024 se Moharastro result 2026 se WB te repeat korbe Gerua shibir.
@bebyfunКүн бұрын
पकिस्तान SLBM SMASH पर वीडियो बनाए क्या नेवी शिप के बराक मिसाइल इसे रोक सकते हैं या AAD ही विकल्प है
@BlackHeart-797822 сағат бұрын
Things made from looted money don’t last long.😂
@shivammalikO122 сағат бұрын
India need 3rd Super carrier by 2030, so it can counter the rising threat in Indian Ocean
@-Blue-_17 сағат бұрын
Sabse bada threat US Navy hai
@unknown_51072 сағат бұрын
@@shivammalikO1 Don't have money for super carriers, they have to focus on SSN & destroyer fleet, also it's almost impossible to make super carrier in just 5 years even the Vikrant class carrier will took next 10 years to commission if they start making from now.
@shivammalikO1Сағат бұрын
@@unknown_5107 it is not about the budget, but priority. And you can't replace the carrier with a submarine. Both have different roles to play. The carrier is not only a part of the fleet but a power projection tool. 3 carrier will allow indian navy to keep 2 always ready for action while third in repair and maintenance
@sandeshm960018 сағат бұрын
Indian Navy should buy and restructurise and test and induct if all weapon system is working perfectly with higher efficiency in each and every aspect.
@hiteshkumarsaini19072 сағат бұрын
Defence Space Agency ने अभी अपनी Strategic Readiness को Space Warfare में परखने के लिए ‘Exercise Antariksha Abhyas - 2024’संपन्न किया है। AFSOD ने कच्छ में 28 सितंबर 2019 को 'Smelling Field', और 'DANX-2019', को अंडमान निकोबार में संपन्न किया था। Defence Cyber Agency, Defence Space Agency, AFSOD के द्वारा कितने वृहद स्तर ये Exercise की जाती है, उनसे भारतीय सुरक्षा को किस तरह रणनीतिक लाभ मिल सकता है? USA, UK, France, Germany, Russia, China के Special Forces के मुकाबले और उनकी क्षमता में हम कहां तक है। इसके वीडियो बनाएं।
@ArvindKumar-ts9ht16 сағат бұрын
Hii Mr. Defence Matrix… I request you that plz make a video regarding to comparison of air craft engines in depth. Contents - F135-PW-100: F-35A Snecma M88 GE F414 Saturn izd 30 1. Russian engine main GE aur PW ki tulna main thrust kam kyu hota hai ? 2. India F414 Ki jagha F100-PW-229 kyu nahi leta 3. Jaise F35 single engine use karta hai jo ki biggest engine hai power main vaise hi russia kyu use nahi karta 4. Rafal main itna kam power full engine kyu use hota hai then Ge & PW. 5. Kya jyada power full engine Se Range km kam ho jati h Dear please reply if u don’t make a video and clear my doubt .🙏🏻
@Aerrow6213 сағат бұрын
Aircraft carriers need to be nuclear powered for them to be relevant in today's world. Thats because the space taken by oil for the ships propulsion can be as much as 35-40% of the ships total tonnage and thats no longer available for aircrafts. The reactor only takes 10% -15% of the volume, runs for 15 years and frees up 40% of the ship for Aircraft fuel, ammunition storage and workshop areas. Conventional ships need more supply support than nuclear ones. For carriers, its a major consideration, unlike in destroyers and small submarines. Space efficiency is also the fundamental reason for catapults. The nuclear carriers are typically only 40% larger than conventional but carry 4 times the aircraft, fuel and ammo. Their sorty rates are much higher.
@alfazalfoods27459 сағат бұрын
Indian navy sub collide with fishing ship . Always a proffestional navy
@prathameshtrimbakkar649810 сағат бұрын
A detailed video on dry thrust kaveri engines developed by Bramhos Aerospace.
@hiteshkumarsaini19072 сағат бұрын
NATGRID, National Counter Terrorism Centre, NTRO, Special Group, Special Frontier Force, NSG, SPG की क्षमताओं, विशेषताओं, फायदों, उपयोग में लिए जाने वाले संसाधनों के बारे में वीडियो बनाएं।
@hiteshkumarsaini1907Сағат бұрын
Zumwalt Class Destroyer के बारे में Detail Video बनाएं और यह भी बताएं कि क्या भारत को Zumwalt Class Destroyer के Design जैसे Stealth Destroyer को बनाना चाहिए या फिर इसी प्रकार के Stealth Frigate बनाना चाहिए ?
@muhammadishaq56114 сағат бұрын
Bad news for India Pakistan has signed as many as 82 Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with friendly countries to export defence products and equipment including advanced drones, fighter jets, commercial and logistic ships, electronic warfare equipment and radars worth US$30 billion. The agreements were concluded during the four-day International Defence Exhibition and Seminar (IDEAS 2024) 😊😂😂
@shankarnarayanbharati526710 сағат бұрын
Congratulations! Hope tera P.M. aur Teri Qaum ab kahi bhi bhikh mangne nahi jayenge😝
@dhurandharsingh609120 сағат бұрын
ब्रिटेन कि ऐसी हालत देखकर दिल को बड़ा सुकुन मिलता है। लुटेरे कभी खुश नही रह सकते।
@amitbhauКүн бұрын
3500 रुपये प्रति टन के हिसाब से मिलेगा तो भारत ने खरीद लेना चाहिये
@averagestudent52235 сағат бұрын
BAR in CATOBAR is "Barrier Arrested Recovery" and not "Butt Arresting Landing"! Peace
@anmolavi441823 сағат бұрын
Let's buy one from UK 😂
@mth46923 сағат бұрын
no
@RahuluddinGandhy16 сағат бұрын
No bro
@SomarcoSSJDieyoung15 сағат бұрын
No
@chandrachurniyogi8394Күн бұрын
India should grab one or both carriers if Royal Navy plans to sell them . . .
@ndeepanshu654123 сағат бұрын
Those are worst of their kind of aircraft carriers.
@sifattauhid765923 сағат бұрын
This are date expired carriers
@marcd519623 сағат бұрын
good for nothing carriers.
@chanakya548022 сағат бұрын
What is the use of this carrier if we don't get F 35
@chandrachurniyogi839421 сағат бұрын
@@marcd5196 your so very wrong my friend . . . it is one of best surface combatant built by Great Britain by far . . . the carrier is a victim of it's own attributes, new untested technologies . . . the decision to acquire the F-35B made things worse from a financial standpoint . . . maintaining the F-35B is costing the navy more than operating the carrier . . .
@nikunjthakkar480921 сағат бұрын
Yeh log toh humein topi pehna na chahte hi hai. Ye pehle offer hue hi they. Ab aadhi kimat mein meile toh lena chahiye
@vinodkaka522520 сағат бұрын
Yar mujhe to isbaat ki fikar he ki Uk ke indono Aircraft carriers me se jrur Koi ek humare galle pdega aur vese bi humare yaha defense policy makers me se ek strong lobby bethi hui he aur vo bi indian military ko capability driven military force banne se zaida cost effective solutions ke piche baagte firte he chahe fir capabilities compromised hojaye pr paise hr haal me bachne chahiye.. So ye UK ke Aircraft carriers me se jo bi hume offers agr kbi hota he to usko Stoval se Stobar carrier bnane me lgni vali costs ko bi hume factors in karna hoga kyunki meri nazar me STOVL se STOBAR carrier fir bi better hote he Aur ab to Italian defense company finmehinca + Leonardo dono milkr STOBAR carriers ke liye AWACS platform develop kr rhe he jo Mig29k/F18/Rafale fighter jets ke size ka he aur vo AWCAS, aircraft ki tail section me ek Ramjet rocket engine jesi technology pr vo loog kaam kr rhe he jiski help ek moderate size fix wing AWACS platform STOBAR Carrier se easily take off krlega Aur arrested cables ke sath land krlega Aur us AWACS Platform ka radar coverage & flying range Ka31 helix AWACS helicopter & AW101Merlin AWACS helicopters se kehi zaida he aur iske saath saath same moderate size UAV mid Air refullers bi develop kiye ja rhe he jo STOBAR carriers se bi operate hoskate he ekbar ye dono platforms develop hogye to fir indian ke mazze hi mazze hoge Aur humare dono Aircraft carriers se fixes wing AWACS platform & UAVs refulers bi operate hona shuru hojayege isliye hume UK ke STOvL aircraft carrier ko kharidne se pehle uske saare pro's & cons bi considered krne hoge.
@sanghipranit13 сағат бұрын
5:30 UK will never sell their "Prince of wales" or "Queen Elizabeth" to India. They might sell them to someone else but never to India. Their Pride wont let them do it.
@shankarnarayanbharati526710 сағат бұрын
Humare Vikrant aur Viraat dono carriers 2nd hand British carriers the😌
@andle12321 сағат бұрын
Rishi ko bola giya tha... discount kar do, humlog utha letey hai, upgrade karke use kar lenge. Suna nahi woh
@EsportsSchool11 сағат бұрын
ऐसी बचत किस काम की... जिससे भट्टा ही बैठ जाये। 🤣🤣🤣
@rajivyadavworkouts947822 сағат бұрын
भाई जेम्स बॉन्ड किस दिन काम आएगा
@rajeshshaw6649Күн бұрын
If it's sold at a discount with f35 India can buy it and perform the necessary modifications it will be a good deal
@mth46923 сағат бұрын
❌ buying junk
@rajeshshaw664923 сағат бұрын
For you, it may seem like junk, but for defense enthusiasts, it represents an asset. Along with the aircraft carrier, we will receive the F-35, which will allow us to learn about fifth-generation naval aircraft. This knowledge will benefit our future programs. Additionally, we will modify the aircraft carrier to suit our specific needs.
@sauravghosh706422 сағат бұрын
Discount mein F35 😂😂😂😂 American won't let it happen
@mth46920 сағат бұрын
@@rajeshshaw6649 don't be naive. what will be offloaded on India is junk + huge liabilities.
@Bishal_Goswami22 сағат бұрын
India se madad maang le hum bana denge😉
@hasanferoz236416 сағат бұрын
Atleast they don't forget to close submarine hatch 😂
@TradingwithAnxiety7 сағат бұрын
Literally fake news 🤣 @@hasanferoz2364
@sud4686Күн бұрын
What about Indian new aircraft carrier order
@RudraPatel-wk6jeКүн бұрын
Financial negotiation me hai
@abhijeetmahajan605720 сағат бұрын
They should sell these cariers to US navy.with proper modification they can use it effectively
@ManishSingh-xo1fb23 сағат бұрын
Ye sari comment me Indian shortcut marne wala opinion hai. Aircraft carriers are useful and a necessity but they don't work alone. They have multiple other ships working with them in tandem. So if you build one aircraft carrier and don't invest in building those other ships which can do cyber Warfare, missile defense, which have icbms and topedos, another having SAMs and Radars... Plus a host of other fighting vehicles along with anti submarine Warfare suite..... Your don't actually have an aircraft carrier. You just have a floating island. But if you already operate a large navy, add an aircraft carrier to the group, and create a potent strike group, and you see your naval prowess go up.
@RaptorsParadise16 сағат бұрын
Instead they should have gone with conventional submarines which would be a better option 😂😂😂😂
@sigma-sigma123 сағат бұрын
@ defence matrix Just because these aircraft carriers are not installed with surface to air missiles hence can be sunk easily would not be accurate, an aircraft carrier does not operate in isolation and they work in carrier groups where there are carrier escort ships which carry significant surface to air/air defence capabilities.
@sigma-sigma123 сағат бұрын
Never the less on board carrier surface to air missiles capabilities would definitely be an important capability without which carrier would be handicapped in case if it is isolated.
@Vartik-jr4qr23 сағат бұрын
We can get SAM but intercepting supersonic and hypersonic missiles is just....
@jddas915519 сағат бұрын
Atleast kuznetsov still given service in initial years compare to glorified british kuznetsov
@v.a.d178423 сағат бұрын
🔴What happened to indias helicopter carrier projects ?
@james4807M23 сағат бұрын
Limited usability. So not cost effective
@marcd519615 сағат бұрын
delayed. hopefully will be sanctioned by 2026 and we would have them by mid 2030s.
@Pollenyunzi23 сағат бұрын
Kya kare kangali ka darr chal Raha hai 😂😂😂
@-Blue-_17 сағат бұрын
Aur yaha ke kuch log aur bahar ke log kehte hai ki Indian navy equip nahi hai aur trained nahi hai
@sandeshm960019 сағат бұрын
Catamaran type of hull designed catobar deck type aircraft carriers is required for Indian naval service tricommand with amphibious capabilities.
@CatOfCulture19 сағат бұрын
Damn, they used to have the best Navy in the world once, and now it's lame asf. With Trump looking like he'll be pulling military support out of NATO, is it not a good opportunity for India to take that chance and work with European countries like Britain?
@-Blue-_17 сағат бұрын
Britain ek bohot hi bekar desh hai isse acha France hai aur sath mai Britain ke log abhi bhi bohot proud karte hai British empire par to aise logo se kuch trade karo hi mat vo bada acha rahega aur khud ko abhi bhi superior samajhte hai
@CatOfCulture12 сағат бұрын
@@-Blue-_ That's the most senseless thing I've read today, wtf. Imagine thinking that the entire population of a country is a monolith and shares the same opinions. Do you even know that a large chunk of the British population hates the crown? Having your tax money go to a family of freeloaders isn't something citizens enjoy. Anyways, Britain themselves have been willing to cooperate with India militarily. I think this is an opportunity we should capitalize on.
@-Blue-_11 сағат бұрын
@@CatOfCulture bilkul nahi Britain jaisi bekar country ke sath to trade bilkul bhi nahi karna chaiye, ek to loot kar gaye aur uper se superiority complex bhi in logo mai bohot hai, aisi country se to India ko bohot hi durr rehna chaiye best alternative France hai
@-Blue-_11 сағат бұрын
@@CatOfCulture and most of the people from from Britain are like this
@anubratadas4911Күн бұрын
There are reports that Prince of Wales might be sold. If true we should buy it.
@ChinathebapoflindustanКүн бұрын
no China should buy it😁😁
@fahad-zd8lfКүн бұрын
Pak ke pfx fighter pe video banao
@Breath300Күн бұрын
Lol 😂who cares cause Pakistan always makes faulty equipment
@theintrovert894Күн бұрын
kuch nhi hai J20 + su57+ Tempest = PFX ... just check its design
@avghinduКүн бұрын
😂
@muhtadaali8847Күн бұрын
Yaar tum logo mai akal nahi. Har jet same he dikhega @@theintrovert894
@LMessii1023 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂
@JASHVEER2222 сағат бұрын
I hope some genius officials in Indian navy does not come with the idea to buy this shit😅
@mth46923 сағат бұрын
buying badly designed junk is not a good idea if the creators are themselves struggling to keep it running.
@AnirbanSarkar20323 сағат бұрын
Bro, on what missile is the PG-LRSAM based on ?
@hiteshadhikari21 сағат бұрын
At no point should india even consider buying this ac It not only requires a lot of money to buy and operate let alone convert to catobar, it also has several mechanical and reliability issues which have persisted despite several repairs and no one can guarantee that these issues will not reoccur later
@jainswarankit23 сағат бұрын
100(सौ) ek rupye mai khareed lena chaahiye Bharat ko ye aircraft carrier!!!! Britain ko salary ke liye paise bhi mil jaayenge or Bharat ka time bach jaayega aircraft carrier banane mai!!!
@HamidAli-h8e20 сағат бұрын
As physics teacher and student i think that Aircarft carriers are not good against good Air power . one can easily hit them
@Cryspio19 сағат бұрын
Carrier is a power projection tool
@HamidAli-h8e19 сағат бұрын
@Cryspio billions of dollars only for power projection
@anubratadas491116 сағат бұрын
@@HamidAli-h8e you are not a military expert so you will not understand importance of aircraft carriers.
@HamidAli-h8e16 сағат бұрын
@anubratadas4911 yes i am not but Americans not using their carriers even against rebels in Gulf
@anubratadas491116 сағат бұрын
@@HamidAli-h8e USS Dwight D Eisenhower is there.
@ShahzaibButt-d1z21 сағат бұрын
Ideas 2024 per be video bano or jf 17 ky radar per be propyganda matrix 😂😂
@Avtr317 сағат бұрын
The whole video was good untill bro proposed that India should buy that crap/white elephant.
@mintdel33323 сағат бұрын
It's uk problem not yours
@EsportsSchool11 сағат бұрын
Prince and Queen... Both are problem for UK
@yashansh831722 сағат бұрын
Can u please make a video if india. Buy this aircraft carriers and convert it in catobar carrier
@K-SHABAB17 сағат бұрын
bravo China
@themoviethriller3796Күн бұрын
1st to comment 😂😂😂😂
@sauravghosh706422 сағат бұрын
Uk k aircraft carriers harrier ko dekh kar bana gaya hai
@lavishbansal1823Күн бұрын
If we buy this carrier then how we developed a capability to developed this giant carrier and I don't think we have that financial power that we buy this and also work on our own program.
@Ironhide234Күн бұрын
Par hum kya karenge kal ko ye beech paani pe band pad jaye jaise ye haar baar ka hai iska
@KRawatXP200322 сағат бұрын
Acquire it to do experiments?
@onlinetricksandtips9613Күн бұрын
What is your favourite fighter aircraft? My favourite is F-18C
@ndeepanshu654123 сағат бұрын
F15 EX.
@SomarcoSSJDieyoung15 сағат бұрын
Rafael
@CatOfCulture12 сағат бұрын
F22, Su57 both look sexy as hell. The Rafale as well
@ameyajadhav763421 сағат бұрын
If we buy from them it will be costly as they will not sell it with full capabilities they will mess up
@MuhammadSufiyan-q9m22 сағат бұрын
Sar plz sar what about Indian submarine collision with fisher boat 😂😂 Vary professional sar Pull sapport to izrael sar
@anubratadas491116 сағат бұрын
That Submarine is perfectly fine you expect a wooden boat to damage a Submarine. 😂
@nabadayhalder10 сағат бұрын
We should offer a cheaper price.
@nasad9223 сағат бұрын
No more aircraft carriers from the Brits. Nice ad but.
@sseries623623 сағат бұрын
Pakistan china Kay 2 full squard test and trail Kar rahay Hain aircraft carrier destroyers Kay liye 5 years hogaye difrent air to sea missile Kay test on going Hain
@shubhampandey949721 сағат бұрын
Englishmen are good in making English truffle only 🍰😂😂
@sanket292322 сағат бұрын
UK IS NOT IDIOT.THEY WILL FACE PROBLEM AND THEY HAVE WILL TO SOLVE IT.
@marcd519615 сағат бұрын
actually they are idiots.
@mave4621 сағат бұрын
Although these r brand new aircraft carrier
@prashanthds778920 сағат бұрын
No need to help.UK by buying their problematic carrier. We have our own. Let us spend our money on our MIC.
@RohitRaj_091121 сағат бұрын
The Article that you've mentioned Is very Misleading 😅. Sure it Do not Have Any Property Surface To Air Missiles, But The Carrier is Never alone, It is always accompanied by a Group, and their soul purpose is to Defend the Carrier . They have all the Types of Soft and Hard kill measures to defend against any attack. You're Knowledgeable enough to realise that except for the New Lott of American super Carriers no aircraft Carrier would be able to Defend Itself Alone. Brits never plan to operate the Carrier Alone hence They skipped Surface to Air Capability. The Displacement is not again as much. And Talking About Issues... Almost All carriers around the Globe keep facing Issues of Some Or Other Sort . The Article is Biased in One way , Hence It Totally missed the Pros and Reasons to miss out on things it does.
@harshitdwivedi143512 сағат бұрын
But hum uk ke bare me kyu baat kar rahe hai ?
@abhiseksahu135520 сағат бұрын
England = worst reliability engineering ✔️✔️
@randombully379823 сағат бұрын
Df 17 is only land capable yet. China is working df 27, anti ship capable version of df 17, with it's first successful test in 2023, but not in service yet. Currently the only hypersonic anti ship capability china has is ballistic missile with Marv.
@kushagravlogs562719 сағат бұрын
Yf 21 is anti ship missilw
@JK-fq1lx11 сағат бұрын
Both these Aircraft carriers performance specially the Prince of wales are so bad that who ever will try to operate will curse their fortune. Indians are not mad to purchase a highly defective white elephant. We can build IAC II, Sister of Vikrant within 5-7 years & another dry dockyard for more than 70,000 Ton ship is near completion, in one of our Govt. owned Ship building facility, which have plenty of experience in this field. Then why India should go for a lame duck like this.
@IamSuperman15423 сағат бұрын
Someone once said that we should watch out for UK Aircraft Carrier when they will be selling this kabada.
@Shan-sg7mm15 сағат бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@knowledged842022 сағат бұрын
India just ekk aircraft carriers bonaya hai oh bhi Russia ke design che or helpche so uk ka aircraft carriers che bhi komjur hai phir bhi batu mae India aircraft carriers powerful sala koi kobra bejta hai India ka hat pohuste hi suna bon jata hai
@abhijeetmahajan605720 сағат бұрын
Poor planning
@prashanthb652118 сағат бұрын
India should buy both of their Aircraft carriers at a bargain price. I dont think UK requires any of them for a foreseeable future.
@marcd519615 сағат бұрын
2 white elephants. it will take BILLIONS of Dollars to modify them in CATOBAR Carriers, rectify all issues and add Air defence.
@prashanthb652114 сағат бұрын
@@marcd5196 Indians are known for bargaining hard.
@mayureshrasam170823 сағат бұрын
I heard many people questioned why UK wanted carrier...and even why Russia is desperate to keep their one carrier afloat....i once read and article about the countries...applying for permanent seat in UN and i saw Aircraft carrier as one of the check box....i guess that is the reason they are so desperate to keep it.
@ndeepanshu654123 сағат бұрын
Aircraft carrier are not ships but 50000 tonne of diplomacy on the go.
@Vartik-jr4qr22 сағат бұрын
China is already a part of UN permanent council since decades without aircraft carrier 😂 there is no such rule. Russia keep it to train navy pilots. They don't want to lose "naval pilot" Capability
@mayureshrasam170820 сағат бұрын
@@Vartik-jr4qr China already had seat in UN it belonged to Republic of China ( taiwan) in 70s it was given to PRC...
@muhammadishaq56113 сағат бұрын
Bad news for India: According to Turkey’s Anadolu news agency: Turkish defense company Repkon signed an agreement with Pakistan’s Wah Industries Limited (WIL) to develop a production and filling line for 155 mm artillery shell bodies, with an annual capacity of 120,000 units.
@HardeepSingh-bh7zw23 сағат бұрын
Jai Modiji Jai BJP Jai Ramrajya
@shubhampandey6668Күн бұрын
Kya comment karu😂
@ranahassan79619 сағат бұрын
Uk brothersss ye hamy gift kar do pakistan uk brothersess zindabad
@Victory-m9d2 сағат бұрын
Bhai khud se bhi bana lo kuch hamesha mangte hi rahoge kiya ?