Defense says jurors had ‘agreement’ to find Karen Read ‘not guilty’ of murder charge

Lawyers for Karen Read filed a motion to dismiss two of the three criminal charges that she faces in connection with the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe.
Read the full story: www.boston25news.com/news/loc...

[@RatTerminator]

Guilty murder 2 🤬

[@Fazzel]

A 4th juror has now come forward to say they were in agreement "Not Guilty" on the murder charge.

[@catherinetierney4834]

@@Fazzel ok yet the defense team has no names no jurors have come forward… so believe the defense attorneys who will do and say whatever they need to in order to get their client free

[@OctoberGirl1009]

@@catherinetierney4834 these jurors reached out to the defense!

[@kgraham5820]

Old Bev needs to get on this!! She either dropped the ball, or done this bs on purpose! I trust her about as much as I do JM, which is ZERO. The jury SHOULD HAVE BEEN HEARD and they still should!! IF their decision was NOT GUILTY, it should be respected!!!

[@cookieramlall9178]

What a waste of money for the city another publicity stunt😮

[@MLA56]

IF they all said Not Guilty on Count #3, they COULDN'T say she was Guilty on Count #2. I suspect the "intoxicated" part of Charge #2 is what led to confusion. OR the Jury was FIXED somehow. By "stacking" the jury, which means dismissing jurors thought to be leaning toward Acquittal and replacing them with pro-prosecution jurors. This was done by Defense manipulation in the OJ Simpson trial back in 1995. THIS TIME, it required the Judge and the Clerk. OR someone "got to" one or more jurors. Keep in mind that these Jurors weren't sequestered during the trial NOR during Deliberation. It'd also include the BLATANT Jury Intimidation during Closing Arguments. NO ETHICAL JUDGE would've allowed it.

[@georgewashington3555]

New Microdots : Judge & DA in Karen Read Case Directly Linked

[@catherinetierney4834]

They have so much insider info …‘not !! Stop buying this crap

[@williamgage4825]

Look over there... DON'T look over at the Albert's... Smoke and mirrors.... Remember 9-11 Smoke and mirrors people Wake up.🤬

[@joanneyoung1081]

That was a strange ; the verdict sounded the jury was a hung jury on all charges wasn’t the foreman suppose to have explained the count in detail. Not sure myself. The biggest charge was eliminated. We did not know that til much later.

[@joyh3086]

The saga continues…

[@stevenlotti5539]

The DEFENSE attorneys should have clarified the status of ALL the charges that the jury were deliberating.

[@danielarafalt2144]

First and foremost, though, this would have been the job of the judge.

[@blueyedevil3479]

They attempted to… the judge said her instructions were sufficient and proceeded without heading the defense request

[@OctoberGirl1009]

It’s up the judge!

[@lindawade4ok639]

Are you kidding did you watch this trial because the judge hated the defense and wouldn't let them clarify those charges, or how to fill out the form. This has to be one of the most horrific judges I've ever seen in my life in action

[@georgewashington3555]

These dirty people if they did not think of Blaming Karen read.. they would of picked on Lucky as a victim of their false Blaming. Lucky the Plow driver.

[@EC-dz3fb]

"would 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲."

[@zigfriedsmother]

@@EC-dz3fb”would of” is a satisfactory colloquialism.

[@EC-dz3fb]

@@zigfriedsmother Not at all, as "would've" is the correct contracted form of "would" and "have." Although "would've" and "would of" are phonetically similar, they're vastly different parts of speech.

[@zigfriedsmother]

@@EC-dz3fb ah yes, the beauty of the colloquialism…no rules

[@tenderstepsPaul]

Too many fine words without meaning. KR is clearly innocent of all charges. It is unfair to retry her on anything.

[@terrys.1401]

CONSPIRACY DE-BUNKED. GUILTY 8-3 OF MANSLAUTER.

[@leslievasquez2645]

Ok Mr/Mrs McAlbert, you keep telling yourself that

[@terrys.1401]

@leslievasquez2645 You're rude! Check into the facts and get off my post if you're going to insult. Get a grip.

[@leslievasquez2645]

@@terrys.1401 what, are you offended? Call the police!

[@terrys.1401]

Ok, I can see you're just nuts. Done wasting time in you. Ba- bye 😂

[@lindawade4ok639]

​@@leslievasquez2645better think very long and hard before you do that in Canton