Learn how to remove tricky colour fringing from your images, both during RAW development and in the post production phase of editing. Credits: Photography by James Ritson.
Пікірлер: 26
@mrdev98439 ай бұрын
My muscle memory is still locked into CS5 so, the transition to using "Photo" is a bit tricky. However, the speed of delivery and clear explanations are much appreciated. I'm looking forward to seeing more short, bite sized tutorials that I can come back to.
@newecreator8 ай бұрын
That Defringe filter works like magic! ✨
@bobn19uk9 ай бұрын
As always an excellent tutorial,thank you 👍
@sbr-synrosimbugracing93389 ай бұрын
Excellent tutorial. You have some of the best ones out there.
@nealschneider65549 ай бұрын
Another great tutorial. Thank you, James.
@uzeyourillusion8 ай бұрын
Great video - I am fully switched over to Affinity Phot now !
@nerrelloader42268 ай бұрын
Thanks for this reminder. Good tutorial, as always.
@elizabethrussell48588 ай бұрын
An excellent video very well explained.
@stevenlitvintchouk31313 ай бұрын
I found this tutorial quite useful. But I'm still confused about when to apply the Defringe filter vs. when to apply the Chromatic Aberration filter.
@thomasjones39418 ай бұрын
Very good and succinct.
@erochas9 ай бұрын
Very useful! Thanks.
@BommeltjeNL26 күн бұрын
Are those astrophotography filters also available for Affinity Photo 2 for iPad? The afmacros for astrophotography work great on the iPad Pro M4. But can’t find the filters nowhere to install them.
@PierGiorgioZuccaro9 ай бұрын
very good!
@RB-vf9xn3 ай бұрын
Is the moon photo suffering from color fringing or chromatic aberration (lens based) ?
@JustHackingAround8 ай бұрын
A.K.A. Affinity Photo ASMR
@robwarner18588 ай бұрын
How did you get your AI voice to sound so good?
@JamesRitson8 ай бұрын
Trade secret I'm afraid!
@lands3r9 ай бұрын
so why would you use a destructive filter over a non-destructive one?
@JamesRitson8 ай бұрын
Predominantly for performance if you have older hardware such as a weak or unsupported GPU-virtually all operations in Photo are hardware accelerated, but if it has to fall back to CPU (software) compositing you will find that having multiple live filters in a layer stack can be quite slow. A destructive version is less flexible, but once the filter is rendered it no longer has any effect on performance.
@LeBurkaTron9 ай бұрын
When are we gonna see Generative Fill?
@toolazytobeoriginal45879 ай бұрын
No clue it they even know how to program AI
@RegularCupOfJoe9 ай бұрын
@@toolazytobeoriginal4587 AI isn't programmed. It's trained. They know how to do it. The question is, is that feature on their roadmap? Another question is, is the time spent on one single feature worth the sacrifice of development time on other features or bugs? You may want generative fill, others may want something else. What do they pick?
@LV4EVR9 ай бұрын
I'm sure they will add it at some point, but I'm OK if they never do. With plenty of free tools for this, it's not a priority for those who value this solid and affordable alternative to RENTING software.
@LeBurkaTron9 ай бұрын
@@LV4EVR I have to applaud them for sticking with,buy and forget when the industry is leaning toward subscription based model. As far as pushing the product forward I think adding some sort of generative AI would be beneficial if implemented correctly but the cost of adding it to the current iteration of Affinity world undoubtedly come at a cost. AI features like what Topaz have on offer might be a better fit, their upscaling is quite good, or some of Adobe's other tricks like adding colour to black and white images or expanding the image canvas.
@LV4EVR9 ай бұрын
@@LeBurkaTron I think it's important to call Adobe's "subscription model" what it is: software RENTAL. As soon as you stop renting, you can no longer edit your own files. You are essentially paying to be held hostage. I refuse to ever participate in this evil model, from any company, regardless of features or functionality.