ATF Whistleblower Vincent Cefalu on Botched Gun Trafficking Operation Fast & Furious. 1 of 2

[@citizenerased7746]

What else did you expect from ATF. Ruby ridge 😐 Waco 😐 they never got their shit together

[@johnsakowicz6723]

ATF's insolence and contempt towards Congress underscores the point that ATF is a superfluous agency. ATF has long outgrown its Prohibition-era purpose. Trump should abolish ATF.

[@farkleberry86]

if it was legalized, then we wouldn't have these problems. Products that are banned go underground. What is the biggest ban between mexico and the us? Drugs

[@donsettie4739]

Wasn't one goal of fast and furious to prove the u.s. supplies guns to mexico. Thus leading to stricter gun laws on the southwest border via this fools errand.

[@bulgingbattery2050]

The CIA needed to provide a source of arms to their proxy forces in Syria.

[@carolgaribay]

150,000 to do nothing.

[@salbal777]

This is a very important interview. Time to wake up.

[@Anonymous8317]

“We’d hate it if we let a gun go and “one of own” got hurt”….uh, how about the us citizens..

[@normx9]

We need a special investigator on this asap. Stop jacking around with the DOJ

[@christopherwalts9378]

Well then all these agents that conducted into that need to be arrested for what they did and charged with murder because none of that would have happened if they wouldn't have did what they did and actually abide by the law

[@justaguy4real]

"thousands"???? why so dam many??? when only a few are needed I'd imagine. Seems like a bit more than that. more like that was the cover story for actually getting those thousands to be used against us.

[@noone3189]

The goal was to have them found in crimes here, helping to fuel the disarm America agenda, driven by Obama.

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 I don't understand, could you please explain?

[@Alpinex105]

@Ka0Z86 Fast and furious was a program that was intended to find those involved in criminal organisations trafficking drugs, as this video suggests. It actually had nothing to do with profiteering. If you wanted to use an example more fitting you could have used: American&Russian weapons supplying criminal organisations in Brazil, The largest arms trade (Saudi and American), Blow back (American trained and funded rebels to secure pipelines, bases and fight proxy battles) andthe gun industry

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 Capitalism has restrictions. You do understand that concept? It's regulated.

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 Then you clearly haven't payed any attention to the video your commenting on. What was the purpose of the operation? How much money did they sell it for? Where did the money go? You do understand the United States sells weapons all the time, right? The largest arms deal was done with United States and Saudi Arabia. It's not much of a secrete. US has on many occasion funded rebels with guns and training for political reasons. The current example being Libyan rebels.

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 It's actually been publicized greatly. Maybe listening to mainstream news would do you some good.

[@Ka0Z86]

@Alpinex105 do you understand the concept of irony?

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 When your coming up with a conclusion make sure you have evidence to support it. Otherwise it's completely irrelevant.

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 1) Traditional FN assault rifles and F2000 2) NATO strikes "bombings" allowed rebels to control armory 3) "Libyan rebels 'receive foreign training' Rebel source tells Al Jazeera about training offered by US and Egyptian special forces in eastern Libya." I sent you the report. 4) There is no animosity here. I was just questioning your statements. I think I was justified in doing so. I do not under any circumstances want to offend you. 5) If you could please respond to my lastpost

[@Alpinex105]

@th3dig1tal0n3 I could also link you to an article by the telegraph uk of france aiding rebels with arms if you woud like?

[@highway234]

@Alpinex105 i'm guessing talon is being facetious here, but i could be mistaken. there may actually be free marketeers this extreme, which is pretty frightening.

[@mte188]

This is a very important interview. But Vince, here, doesn't know anything about it. Pay close attention to the answers to the reporters very specific questions about what it was exactly he did to blow the whistle? He never answers. And the reason is because he was not involved, wasn't there, didn't even know about it. He was pending termination from the govt for violations so extreme to warrant termination before the operation he claims he called out. He simply did not.

[@donsettie4739]

No facts here. What violations....