Demystifying Functional Safety: SIS, SIL, and MooN Explained

▶ The easiest way to learn industrial automation:
realpars.com
▶ Get a membership for your team:
www.realpars.com/for-teams
▶ You can read the full post here:
www.realpars.com/blog/functio...
⌚Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro
00:24 - What is Functional Safety?
01:27 - Safety Instrumented System (SIS)
02:51 - Safety Integrity Level (SIL)
05:47 - MooN system
07:01 - Summary
In this video, we will explore the concepts commonly included within the domain of Functional Safety.
The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), defines functional safety as identifying potential dangers and activating protective measures to prevent or reduce the impact of hazardous events.
It seems logical then that the goals of functional safety are to ensure a system or equipment is operating appropriately and actively prevent the failure of a system from causing harm to people and property.
All regulatory process control systems are designed and installed with safety in mind.
Even so, the risk of injury, fire, explosion, and other catastrophes is not at a tolerable level.
Deploying a functional safety system allows for an automated, safe shutdown of processing units in instances of unusually risky or potentially catastrophic situations that exceed the capabilities of the automatic process control system or trained operators to rectify.
Adding another layer of protection called the Safety Instrumented System, or SIS, moves us closer to achieving the desired functional safety condition.
The regulatory process control system and the SIS are separate.
A Safety Instrumented System consists of sensors, logic solvers, and final control elements with the sole aim of ensuring the process enters a safe state upon encountering specific conditions.
The logic solver is often a Safety PLC manufactured by vendors such as Allen Bradley, Omron, or Schneider.
In functional safety, SIL is a measure of the probability of failure on demand (PFD) for a Safety Instrumented System. PFD is the probability that a device or logic solver will fail causing the SIS not to respond when demanded.
There are four discrete SIL integrity levels. The higher the SIL level, the lower the PFD for the safety system.
A SIL integrity level applies to an entire system. Individual devices or components do not have SIL ratings.
To be clear, there is no such thing as a SIL-rated device. You can't buy SIL-rated temperature transmitters. You can buy a transmitter suitable for use in a SIL environment.
The International Electrotechnical Commission IEC 61508:2010 standard classifies the safety functions into four discrete SIL integrity levels.
Alright, so how are the SIL environment requirements determined? In a nutshell, each hazard is assigned to a target SIL. The determination process involves Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment to bring the overall risk to an acceptable level.
Not every company uses the same determination process. There's the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) method whereby all known process hazards and layers of protection are carefully examined.
Some companies use an Assignment Matrix to assign a SIL based on a qualitative ranking of the event likelihood, event consequences, and the availability of regulatory process control safeguards already in place.
Let's go to the MooN system concept… Not the actual MooN in the sky, but the "M out of N" system.
The MooN system introduces a collective decision-making framework. It is defined as a system with N units (components, channels, etc.), in which M out of N units are sufficient to initiate an action.
There are a required minimum of M units to vote in agreement to command the execution of the safety action.
=============================
If you would like to learn more about Temperature Transmitters, then we suggest you check out our course Temperature Transmitters: Calibration, Principles & Industry Applications: www.realpars.com/courses/temp...
This course was developed in partnership with ‪@endresshauser‬ At the end of the course, you will receive a certificate of completion from Endress + Hauser.
=============================
Did you miss out on the latest and greatest? Catch up now by watching our videos right here:
www.realpars.com/blog/codesys...
www.realpars.com/blog/ladder-...
www.realpars.com/blog/opc-ua-...
=============================
TWEET THIS VIDEO: ctt.ac/SNRkL
=============================
Follow us on Facebook 👉 / therealpars
Follow us on Twitter 👉 / realpars
Follow us on LinkedIn 👉 / realpars
Follow us on Instagram 👉 / realparsdotcom
#RealPars #functionalsafety #industrialsafety

[@gabekoenig6552]

I am a safety engineer. This is a great introductory video for newcomers. However, I think it would be beneficial to discuss CAT & PL as that is more universal. ISO 13849-1:2023 no longer supports SIL and few integrators in the US will refer to SIL over CAT & PL with the exception of device manufacturers.

[@KevinNguyen-tw5ml]

Thank you very much !

[@realpars]

You are welcome!

[@joncaudill3214]

Very nice and easy to follow explanation.

[@realpars]

Glad it was helpful!

[@anplechen]

Hi! It's the first time I heard about MooN. For me, it's something new. I feel I am outdated with safety in machinery 😂. Thanks a lot for sharing!

[@realpars]

You're very welcome!

[@fendix975]

Hello. Excellent video and fantastic explanation. Could you make a video where you explain M out-of n and what is the best one according to improve reliability? Please. Thanks in advance.

[@realpars]

Thank you for your kind comment and topic suggestion! I will happily go ahead and forward this to our course developers as a topic suggestion.

[@semiuolajide2890]

Thanks

[@okolceaser6056]

How to program temperature sensor on a PLC and PLC gives out 4-20mA

[@realpars]

Thank you for your topic suggestion! I will happily pass this on to our course developers. Happy learning!