Deobandi Violations?! | Reaction to AIM National Conference | Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi | Suleyman Khan

0:00 intro
4:32 Is association with Deoband an issue?
10:27 Who are the Ahl Ul Sunnah?
18:16 What is Wahdatul Wjood ?
24:28 The Life of The Prophet in the grave (hayati vs Mamati)
46:36 Tawaeez/Tamaim
54:08 Tawassul and Istigatha
1:03:00 Conclusion
‪@OneMessageFoundation‬ ‪@MuslimSkeptic‬ ‪@KarimAbuzaid‬ @FaridResponds #salafiyah #salafi #deoband #dawah #islam #aqeedah #muhammad #tawheed

[@MuslimSkeptic]

JazakumAllah khayran, very beneficial discussion!

[@abuusayd1932]

Jazakallah Khair Brother Daniel for standing up for the Haq, your idea of there's a bigger threat to Islam then the Internal affairs of Islam is so True Akhi.

[@juxtapositionMS]

Shaykh Uthman"s sectarianism attitude is exposed. I was surprised to hear such ignorance from this Uthman Shaykh. He was trying his best to portray deobandis as some kind of deviants by bringing some fringe group amongst deobandis. So much frustrating! He also rejects Hadiths in Bukhari on the age of marriage of Ayesha (Ra.). Disgraceful!

[@FR-pl2xp]

@@juxtapositionMS not true

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@FR-pl2xp True

[@TawheedPromoter]

Fatwa of Deoband Answers : 1. Yes, Allah is everywhere. 2. Yes, He exists everywhere at the same time 3. Allah dwells in everything (Fatwa: 1023/860-432/7) This is Hinduism or what ?

[@MohamedShou]

I’m a British Somali and I always heard derogatory things said about Deobandi’s from the “Salafi” brothers. Alhamdulillah I stepped out from that cultish “salafi” mentality and did some research about Deoband and wallahi they did and are still doing amazing work to preserve Islam

[@twitjunkie6007]

What's the proof that you are from Somalia? You could be from Saharanpur. Anyway, so you follow only Imam Abu Hanifa? Also do bidats like Shab e barat?

[@nofeardocere]

@@twitjunkie6007 Bro long story short you can come and ask question directly from mufti Yasir Nadeem alwajdi liv stream... Or contact him through email.... But it's not a matter of conflict...

[@khuzaimabutt392]

mashaAllah akhi

[@khuzaimabutt392]

@@twitjunkie6007 i see you're not fine

[@FulltimeDuddooScene]

Salafis are the jahil edgelords of the ummah and berelvis are the jahil cringelord morons of the ummah. Stay away from them. If one has ilm and hangs out with them loses whatever ilm they have. They eat ass.

[@mohammadiqbal9550]

Deoband had played and is still playing a great role in preserving Islam in its real form in subcontinent and in other parts of the Muslim world. Its Deoband that produced many great scholars like Moulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri. Being a kashmiri we are also suffering from this narrow mindset of salafis. But i swear by Allah they never dare to face any deobandi scholars. They only spread fitna on social media.

[@ukasxm8245]

I believe the primary issue here is that many atharis like my self confuse the beliefs of barelvis with deobandis. Jazkallah for this discussion.

[@muhammadprarie8819]

Naah, that's not always the case. Many of them know exactly the difference between the 2, but despite that they'll try to find faults within the Deobandis but they always fail. They're looking for trouble, they're perhaps jealous that Deobandis have the most madaaris, Ulama, huffaz, etc everywhere and they barely have anything

[@hammadsait4626]

Exactly this.

[@MuhammadAbdullah-kx3kn]

@@muhammadprarie8819 Neo-Salafis wants to gain legitimacy through bullying, mass Tabdee' etc. But Deobanbis are gaining legitimacy through rational and love 💕

[@MS-Hussain]

@@muhammadprarie8819 exactly

[@muhammadprarie8819]

@ahmadhanbal8497 You sound like a straight up JAAHIL. YES a big time JAAHIL. Majority of the Huffaz, Ulama, Daees, Islamic Institutes everywhere across the world in this day and age have been produced by the Deobandis. Allah has taken the most work of deen from them, even the BBC knows that, do your resesrch

[@MoeedKhan1979]

Alhamdulillah. Deobandis are the great muslim group like other muslim groups. Deobandis teachings making best sense 🌹👍💪🇵🇰❤️

[@khuzaimabutt392]

❤️❤️

[@AtvVibes]

The Islamic services of Deoband scholars are numerous Mashaallah 💖❤

[@abqadeer1834]

they only serve shirk may allah protect all muslims who are towheed lovers

[@thetruth4605]

I am really admirad by the legacy and diversity of deaband..they spread Quran(e.g maulana Mahmood deabandi,shabir Ahmad usmani)...spread hadith (Anwar Shah Kashmiri...)...jihad against British,NATO....Defand shaba(sipay sahaba)... Produced hufazes, aalima in lakhs...Deaband has produced dayiees (Tablighi jamaat)Also giving dawa against murtada, kuffars,ex muslim...They are against shirk and biddat..❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@MS-Hussain]

Masha Allah mufti sb, cleared the concept of wahdatul wujood, hayatun nabi, etc. to us in the best way

[@GRayfoxasd]

Allah is not nowhere.

[@apnafarms]

@@GRayfoxasd kzbin.info/www/bejne/jamqp3SYoKeBm8U

[@patthanboy444]

I am a deobandi my whole damn family is deobandi so are my friends and whole circle, but this Wahdatul Wujood concept as coined by salafis is not something that was ever part of my Aqaid, or my family's or my friends or any of my deobandi teachers or anyone i know of...but this is still pushed down our throats through manipulations ot wrong labels, and this really pisses me off.. about salafis... Their politics is really dirty They knowingly try to mix deobandi and barelvis... which is sick and pathetic And only deepen the difference and upsets the people of subcontinent We have respect for the work of shaikh uthman, but these manipulations only make it harder to respect him and his salafi alikes....

[@patthanboy444]

@ahmad hanbal sufis ≠ deobandi Watch the video moron....

[@sarfrazali9868]

@ahmadhanbal8497 I’m not sure you’ve watched this video? Despite the evidence provided, you maintain the view of the claim you are making.

[@apnafarms]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jamqp3SYoKeBm8U

[@apnafarms]

@ahmad hanbalkzbin.info/www/bejne/jamqp3SYoKeBm8U

[@plyicebo133]

Masha Allah, great session. As a student of knowledge I learnt a lot from this. I come from the so called "salafi" background, all these are news to me. I agree we can forgo these secondary differences and work together to unite the Ummah.

[@ongbak9760]

Deoband #1 ! Producers of shuyukh and scholars on such a fevered pitch for over 100 years. SubhanAllah. The Salafis/Atharis are just there to be Fox News and critical of everything, but themselves.

[@peacenow6618]

Thank you so much for this video. It was very beneficial. Keep up the Great Work! Much appreciated!

[@hassanqidwai4379]

After listening this session, I have increased my beleiving in Ulema Deobond. Deobond are totally on Haq Haq and Haq. Ulema e Deobond Zindabad

[@abqadeer1834]

their ulemas are ashraf ali thanvee sahb rasheed ahmed gangoie and many more but in 1902 their was ijma by the saudi ulemas from mecca madina they are atleast 260 ulemas who say that these ulemas are kafir after reading their books.

[@hassanqidwai4379]

That time, there had been propaganda against ulema Deobond by Gair muqulid Ulemas. Because they hate Abu Hanifa ( R A) and fiqah hanfia and they have keep misunderstanding about fiqah hanfia and Ulemas Deobond. Although so many Ulema e Arab are still love and respect from Ulema e Deobond

[@slimshady7625]

​@@hassanqidwai4379Ashraf Ali thanvi compared the ilm of prophet saw to an animal astagfirullah

[@abdulbasit911]

That was very necessary video of the time. I got really confuse after watching AIM confrence video and really need this classification. Jazakallahu khair

[@mobashirsifat3539]

lol, If you truly want the clarification then verify from the Quran and Sunnah, you can search every title on youtube and watch some qualityful videos which will give references from the Quran and Sunnah.

[@abdulbasit911]

@@mobashirsifat3539 thanks brother, jazakallahu khair...

[@khalidbham7344]

@@mobashirsifat3539 Bro you're funny. You said "then verify from the Quran and Sunnah", then proceed to tell him to watch KZbin videos. If you want someone to look at Quran and Sunnah, why not tell them to open the Quran and Hadith?

[@SHAKHSIYAA]

Brother Daniel was put in a corner and forced to utter his manhaj. Very bad of the panel to do such a thing. What they want to achieve by doing this. The necessity of the times is to have a united Ummah and handle our differences in a good manner. Not take a holy attitude of saying one group is better than the other. Allah guide us all.

[@qrasheed]

جزاك الله خير for clarification !

[@zakirahmedshaik6870]

I am content that Ulema e Deoband are on the manhaj of Salaf and don't deviate from Quran and Sunnah. Masha Allah great explanation. I cant be more grateful to be associated with the Ulema e Deoband. Alhamdulillah

[@fist444]

After watching this video mashaallah one can see the difference in the level of knowledge and scholarship these ulema have compared the the madhakhila uthman and co. Jazakallah khair Ustadh Daniel.

[@MrJeherulAli]

JazakumAllah Khayran for this beneficial video Brothers, You cleared much of my doubts regarding Deobandi movement. Wallahi we Muslims need to unite against the greater evil rather than dividing over such petty issues.

[@Overfloater777]

Masha'Allah 👏🏼, great comment. Jazakum Allah khayr 🤲🏼

[@ishtihar5946]

Ulema e deoband zindabad ❤

[@forshorts86]

The way mufti suleyman read the hadiths is too good.

[@servanttoall4037]

ماشاء اللّٰہ Well done guys, may Allah the almighty reward you for this noble cause and explanation. Aameen

[@BlackWOLF-vt3rh]

Ulema e Deoband has always fought against Islamophobia. They have always defended Islam in all formats.❤

[@userYtf]

Sheikh if possible please made a video on what are athari and difference between athari and maturdi and Ashari because many people don't even know even clearly about these terms

[@apnafarms]

Mufti saheb please invite Shaikh Mohammad Yasir al hanafi

[@qazitasawur]

It is as they say : " Never ask Deobandis for proofs because they will overwhelm you with proofs which you won't be able to refute"

[@GRayfoxasd]

I see no proof, only assumptions. I do not believe Allah is no where as he said all Muslims agree with. I believe what is written in the Qur'an

[@syedshuaib9462]

Brother you still need to research about you lack in research and rating please go back to school !!

[@syedmuhammadhamza348]

MashaAllah, very beneficial discussion and very good explanation and clarification for the aqeedah of deoband MA

[@OSMANBAY-ms3bm]

Everybody knows Deobandi power Tabligi jamaat power Jamiat ulema e Hindi Jamiat Pakistan Deobandi madarsa in india 70% Pakistan 70% Bangladesh 80% And many other countery Taliban also debandi Also big contribute in freedom of india

[@shahinahmad9695]

Bangladesh 90%

[@H.a.q.q]

Masha Allah

[@mohammedkamal-nr8qx]

Masa Allah

[@wajidrangrez5234]

@@shahinahmad9695 Deoband❤❤❤

[@MasoodKhan-so9hv]

67 videos from Al Islam Productions covering various hugely problematic aspects of salafism. Has any salafi responded to this? Will Farid make a playlist addressing all these arguments? All I've seen so far is "Who cares what these 2 deobandis say!"

[@qasmibook8710]

Mufti sb this is very important and useful video for all believers. Please add a separate urdu tarjama on the running screen too so that the urdu knowing audiences can pick up from the scattered pearls.

[@peacenow6618]

May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!

[@juxtapositionMS]

Those who seek truth and are sincere will listen to this video and will learn but those who are arrogant, who want division and sectarianism and are egotistic will argue without even listening and will spread hatred instead of learning.

[@H.a.q.q]

Agreed brother

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@H.a.q.q Look here in the comment section. How these "salafis" are just parroting their false obsolete accusations before listening to the video. They have no intention to unite with the other side of the ummah.

[@H.a.q.q]

@@juxtapositionMS Yeah brother I read their comments. But now the matter isn't limited to Madkhalis as the whole salafi cult has united to cause c o r r u p t i o n and fuel the f i r e of d is unity among the Ummah. But what's really s ad and shocking was Sheikh Uthman's behaviour with Ustad Daniel when Daniel called for unity and Sheikh kept on giving the tags of bida'a deviant misguided and all that. I had recommended and commended Sheikh most of the time and I thought that he was all for uniting the Ummah but now I know his real side.

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@H.a.q.q Yes. That's really sad. I was disheartened as well. But I wasn't surprised because I have noticed such attitude in Shaykh Uthman before. I listen to him sometimes but I never subscribed to his channel because of his snakery. The thing is that he is a daee. And daees sometimes lie to attract non-muslims into Islam which is haram. He lied before on the age of marriage of Aisha (Ra.) by rejecting Hadith from Bukhari. He made up his own opinion. But what surprised me was his complete lack of knowledge on deobandi movement and then pressuring Daniel to denounce them illogically and all that in public in front of everyone. Have some hikmah - both Imam Karim AbuZaid and Shaykh Uthman. This is pathetic. And the way how it's been handled by Imam Karim, who is a sincere person but not aware of deobandis, indicates that this AIM conference will not shine in future. End Note: The @Tawheed Promoter guy is a madkhali bootlicker. Daniel shared his tweet on his TG channel today. A hateful ignorant individual.

[@asifbhaivahora8102]

Reason why so many salafi aalim get misguided despite considerable knowledge of arabic and their salafi manhaz is that they have just one sided knowledge and that too not about old salaf scholars and how they too had differences too. On the contrary Deobandi scholars study not only old scholars but all four schools of thoughts and their work in details and understand different perspectives and their reasoning and have written countless books about the stand the deobad ulama take and why. However on negative side, deoband ulama are not forefront in teaching in salafi institutions since they would refuse to teach any specific school or rigidity and this creates lots of schools with no knowledge about deoband scholars, their work, their ideology etc. When they be bit famous on KZbin they tend to think they know everything and try to refute old scholars and entire deobsnd scholarship without reading them totally or debating in public or private and develop misunderstanding which they continue plaguing others with.

[@abqadeer1834]

you are talking about 4school of thought but the 3 are ahlul hadees aalim. immam malik compiled muwata immam shafee compiled musnad shafee. immam ahmed bin humble compiled musnad humble. see the authentic opinion of these 3 great ulemas towards abu hanifa his main students abu yusuf and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani immam abu yusuf writes abook by the name of kitab ath takhreej read this book. immam muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani wrote a book by the name of musnad sheuba in this book he had a chapter named rade abu hanifa. see the opinion of immam bukharee whome he called kufee. see the opinion of immam muslim who is the author of sahee muslim. and you are saying devband see the aqeeda of their ulemas. hanfiyat is a propaganda against islam. did abu hanifa wrote any tafseer of quran did he compiled any hadees book no his students abu yusuf muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani why they go madina and take knowledge from immam malik. lyth bin saad says i was with sufyan at thawri and we heard the news abu hanifa died sufyan at thawri says alhamdulilah allah takes the person who cuts islam branch by branch all muhadis of the past have refuted abu hanifa in present sheikh albani says that abu hanifa was zaief in the field of ahadees. abdullah bin ahmed son of immam ahmed bin humble he compiled a book by the name of kitab as sunnah in this book he writes that whenever abu hanifa was in narration means sanad my father deliberately say abu fallanah he dont name abu hanifa if he was in sanad and declared ahadees zaief. do you ever think why hanafee fiqh always opposes the quran hadees sunnah and the aqwal of sahaba the reason is immam malik opinion he is from ahle rai. and you are talking about devbandi

[@waqaswani2994]

Masha Allah both were humble and eloquent clearing a lot of confusion. The thing I realized is that people throw blanket terms to malign someone but I think if the terms, along with their definition or explanation are presented then it would be appropriate to judge

[@johndillinger8056]

The scholars in the UK from Duesberry Britain I actually have been dealing with this issue for a long time and they are doing a great job with it I think we should shed light on what they are doing because they put the videos together very well and they have been clarifying these issues

[@zak2509]

Uthman should never be given a platform with esteemed scholars. He should stick to dawah stalls to non-Muslims and know his place.

[@bluechand9235]

😂

[@FR-pl2xp]

What about Dr. Yasir Qadhi? Should he be given a platform with esteemed scholars?

[@GRayfoxasd]

Your ignorance when talking about those more knowledgeable than yourself shows you are incapable of overcoming your own ego.

[@zak2509]

@@GRayfoxasd thanks mitch!

[@lubnayousuf3863]

Some Ulamas r also challenged him for Discuss but Uthman refused

[@Naamra123]

May Allah subhana wa ta'ala increase the deobandis and Ahlul hadith in number in the sub continent.

[@FulltimeDuddooScene]

The ahle Hadith and berelvis make takfir on deobandis. Why are you making such a Dua? 😡

[@Naamra123]

@@FulltimeDuddooScene Ahlul hadiths don't commit shirk, barelvis do. That's why.

[@harriskhan7671]

brother Danial for standing strong jazakAllahhukhair when shaikh Uthman said Shaikh m. Tahir panjpere (ra) please type the name and listen to his students the true Deobandi on Hayat mamaat debater of Islam mufiser and muhadith Allamah khizar Hayat and Allamah ata Ullah bandyalvi ..... now most Deobandi nowadays believe that all the dead Muslim non-Muslim can hear and are Hayat in the qabar..

[@abovetheatheist1794]

Sarbakaf sar Boland DEOBAND DEOBAND ❤❤❤❤

[@Salma_xx]

I truly truly appreciate this video A LOT. jazakumullahu khoir! Some people really cancel the deobandis, especially the so called "salafis" here in asian regions.

[@baigu1]

Why no stream on the Urdu channel for consecutive two weeks?

[@naser908azam24]

I respect you brother Daniel haiqatou. I love the way you dealt with accusations with calm mind

[@mbinmaslamah]

What an excellent video! MashaAllah. Alhamdulillah. May Allah (SAW) guide us and accept our good deeds. Ameen.

[@khuzaimabutt392]

I found sheikh uthman biased and dishonest explaining it. Very sad knowing that 😔

[@FulltimeDuddooScene]

Moron straight up LIED against Mufti Taqi Uthmani. I'm done with this guy.

[@ehsankakar]

Yeah...i think it seems that he is is just unaware of the aqaid of deaoband but the fact of the matter is that all his misunderstandings has been explained very well by mufti Yasir in this video...

[@ehsankakar]

@@FulltimeDuddooScene he must have shown some respect for sheikh ul Islam mufti taqi usmani even the Arabs ulemma respect him...

[@khuzaimabutt392]

@@ehsankakar ❤️

[@qaisbintanweer337]

Masha Allah mufti sahab aap ne bahut achche aur mudallal andaaz me guftagu ki

[@khuzaimabutt392]

❤️

[@Naushadai077]

MashaALLAH mufti sahab... This is the vary good video for aqida of ulma-e-deoband on the topic which is point out by Brother Sheikh uthman-bin-farooq...

[@amirulafiq4371]

Despite certain differences I see Salafis and Deobandis having a kindred spirit. We all want to promote true Tawheed and dismantle the abominable beliefs of Barelwis and the Shi'a

[@TawheedPromoter]

No brother that's not true Misguided cult of deobandis Fatwa of Darul-Uloom Deoband on where is Allah? Q1. Is Allah present everywhere? Q2. Is Allah present everywhere at the same time? Q3. Does Allah dwell in everything? Fatwa of Deoband Answers : 1. Yes, Allah is everywhere. 2. Yes, He exists everywhere at the same time 3. Allah dwells in everything (Fatwa: 1023/860-432/7) This is Hinduism or what ? Meanwhile The Muslim Skeptic ​ excessively praises them and say those who criticize them are agents of k#ffar.

[@juxtapositionMS]

Exactly. But they won't agree because of their Arab pride.

[@MS-Hussain]

@@TawheedPromoter come up with something else. Too old. U hv copy pasted it a hu dress times atleast

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@MS-Hussain He is a hardcore madkhali bootlicker.

[@ayeshanaseer3893]

@@TawheedPromoter are you the twitter guy who compared deobandis to pagans and homosexuals nauzubillah. Have fear of Allah before putting such allegations on Muslims. Lying and calling other Muslims kuffar, mubtadi and shirki is a huge sin. Come out of your bubble and study about other schools of thoughts if you cannot do that then shut up and focus on your own iman. You are not a scholar to indulge in these debates and you are no one to go around telling people what our aqeedah is. May Allah guide you, Ameen.

[@Bawn.Meedoh]

Mowlana suleyman one of my favorite teachers back when I was a student at Al hasnain of Indianapolis

[@lazerspace9337]

Shakib?

[@sharikwaseem8028]

Please start short course on aqeeda ulama ae deoband it is need of time

[@mdrasid007]

Thanks Mufti saab for made me understand the true meaning of Wahdatul Ujood.

[@hidayatkemutlashiofficial6301]

Mashallah jazakallahu khair mufti sahab 👍

[@wajidrangrez5234]

Sar bakar sar buland Deoband Deoband❤❤❤❤ 💪💪💞💞💞💞

[@mohduvais7434]

I think the explanation of Mufti Yasir sb was great and our Salafi brothers should not generalize all deobandis in the same blanket. Having said that on the topic of Tawassul, the real difference of opinion between deobandi scholars and Salafis is that whether tawassul from the dead is permissible or not. And in this topic, there is a difference of opinion between deobandi scholars as well. So, in my opinion top scholars of deobandis and Salafis should initiate a meeting and present there evidences to each other and then document the conclusion of the meeting. May Allah guide us all.

[@aali8874]

Wa'alaikum assalam wa rahmatu'LLAHI wa barakatuh to mufti saab

[@Samsungphone2]

We appreciate the mature stance and great manners.

[@choranginama6119]

We can raise the issue of Tajseem personification of God in response but we always make taweel for them but they have to understand that while sitting in the castle of glass they can not throw stones on the other people.

[@faizysheikh8403]

Alhamdulillah for ulema e deoband and the efforts they put to preserve tauheed in india,pak and Bangladesh and afganistan but the ignorant people's who doesn't even know the basics of deoband they are accusing on deoband that they are grave worshipers but in real the moment of Tablighi jamaat which is affiliated to deoband. The first principal of this jamat is that no one can do nothing but allah. And the second part of the first principal is that we can get success on by following the footsteps of Muhammad ﷺ than how can someone put allegation of grave worshipping on deoband.

[@syedsyed8048]

I immensely respect Brother Uthman ibn Farooq and Dr. Yasir Nadeem. I’m convinced both are part of Ahle haqq. I think the clarifications provided so nicely and respectfully by Dr. Yasir Nadeem should put to rest the misunderstandings and assumptions on the part of Br. Uthman ibn Farooq. I’m sure, if they’ve still remaining issues, they are well qualified and capable to put all doubts to rest.

[@MusaBhaiOfficial]

any updates regarding uthman ibn farooq!?

[@alessonoftheday7860]

Sheikh Yasir , I am big fan of both you and sheikh Usman as well...but your discussion with him must be public on any social platform, because he assaulted him publicly...It is dire need to clarify him on social platform.. Shaikh assaulted those scholars, who fought for preservence of Aqaed...Those were Ulema e Deoband, who brought our elders from shirk to Tauheed , probably 80 years ago , and now MashAllah we, their offsprings , are Tauheedi Muslims.❤

[@SufiMuslimBD]

80 years ago you was mushrik? Or khawariz salafi? Gustakh deobandi ulama brought you to Tauhid? Did you gone mad? Do you have any idea about the creator of deobandi so called alims?

[@juxtapositionMS]

20:10 Exactly. Most deobandis do not believe in Wahdatul Wujood. And it did not emerge from deobandis either. This concept came from the sufis. Some deobandis accept sufism and they believe this. Shaykh Uthman is resorting to shaming tactic by lying, I think intentionally.

[@muhammadjamessutton]

Concept came from the sufis? Were the people who started the deoband movement not sufis? Maybe you should go read their biographies.

[@bittertruth6575]

Dear brother, Wahdatul Wujood is not a belief. It is a state. Think of it as the state of Ihsan that is mentioned in Hadith Jibril AS. Some pious people reach this state and so for them it is as though NOTHING EXISTS EXCEPT ALLAAH. They become so drowned in the love and worship of Allaah that to them, the existence of everything else is unimportant, temporary and dependant and therefore it can be considered as not even an existence. We do not say 'whoever does not believe in Wahdatul Wujood is a kafir' SINCE IT IS NOT A BELIEF or 'whoever does not reach this high state is not a true Muslim' since not everybody is capable of reaching it.

[@qazitasawur]

Wahdatul Wajood has been refuted by Mufti Tariq Masood too

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@bittertruth6575 Exactly. That's a good explanation. But these neo-salafis are so ignorant and hypocritical.

[@faatimahjadwat4917]

He's a very honest sincere person, I don't think he did it on purpose, maybe he has learnt it when he was studying under deobandis

[@ASTAGFIRULLAH_____________000]

Allahumma barik ❤ may Allah give us hidayat

[@nsayyed5469]

May allah save us from all modern sects and preserve classic ahlu sunnah. Ameen golden age of islam was a era of ahlu sunnah ahlu tasawwuf. Ya Rasoolallahhi ajirna Al Gauttha (helper) Rasoolallah !

[@mohammadzaki544]

Shaikh usman bin farooq should repent for making false accusation on deoband

[@zoubeir2237]

Fazaail amal is filled with shirk. Go and read for yourself.

[@mohammadzaki544]

@@zoubeir2237 already completed fazaile aamaal more than 1 time no shirk false accusations for the purpose of dividing ummah by so called salafis

[@zoubeir2237]

@@mohammadzaki544 I guess you did not read it. The following is only a sample. Ask Allah sincerely for guidance, He will guide you. I was also a deobandi but when the truth is clear, we should not let arrogance blind us. Here it is: 1. Fadhail A’maal (Fadhail Sadaqaat , page 558) : ” … I (zakaria Khandelvi) am a liar , I am nothing . It is yours ( Allaah) shade , it is yours (Allaah) existence . what am I ? I am nothing and whatever I (Zakaria Khandelvi) am that is ( exactly) what you ( Allaah) are , and I and you (Allaah) are Shirk upon Shirk .” 2. fazaail A’maal - vol 2 , Fazaail hajj , page 88, Urdu version ) : “Moosa bin Muhammad says that once an Ajmee (a non-Arab) was performing Tawaaf; He was a good and religious man. During Tawaaf, he heard the sound of the anklets of a beautiful woman . He began to stare at the woman. From the Yemeni Corner a hand emerged and slapped the man as a result of which his eye came out and from the wall of the House of Allaah came a voice saying, “You make Tawaaf of our house and look at our women. This slap was in return for that look. If you repeat such behaviour again, we will punish you harder.” 3. Fadhail Darood Sharif ( Tablighi sufi book ) , page 155 , couplet 16 : “( I wish to) circumambulate (make Tawaaf) of your ( Sallallahu aleyhi wa sallam ) pure Grave and the Green Dome in a state of mad ecstasy…” 4. Fazaail A’maal - vol.2 , Fazaail Hajj , page 93 , Urdu version) : “And it has been reported from certain buzrugs (elders / pious people) that some people live in khurasan but are close to the ones who perform tawaaf . AND YET THERE ARE SOME TO WHOM THE KABAH ITSELF GOES TO VISIT THEM .”

[@mohammadzaki544]

@@zoubeir2237 above mentioned all had been answered and written in books please dont be ignorant be pious and research on both sides the first one you are lying Second one is khurooqul aadaat Eveeything is clear wallaahi i was earlier salafi ahlul hadees and i made a research and found that companions of prophet were not ahlul hadees or salafi please stop defaming fazaail e amaal The word that you have mentioned "tablighi sufi book "show your hate

[@zoubeir2237]

@@mohammadzaki544 your answer shows how you have been brainwashed. By just saying books have been written shows your level of knowledge. Remember that on the day of judgment, you will have no maulana or mufti to support you in these falsehood. Be a man and accept the truth. As for number 1, refer to the book, you will find it. As i said, you did not read fazail amaal. If you had read, you would have come across it. Unfortunately you are here only to defend falsehood. For number 2, the kaba has a hand. So, where was that hand when the sahaba were being tortured in mecca? When the mushrik placed intestines of camel on our beloved prophet's back while praying, where was that hand to defend him? FEAR ALLAH!!! For the other facts i mentioned, it seems that you ran away from them. Tawaf of grave?? The kabah visits some persons?? Why did the kabah not visit the prophet when he made hijrah to madinah? Your so called awliya is better than our prophet? Haqq has destroyed falsehood. May Allah guide you.

[@SAAZ_Zebaish]

Shaikh Uthman had also bad-mouthed about Tableeghi Jamaat and the book Fazaail-e-Aamaal.

[@ishfaqahmad.2531]

While he accepted in his video that he came to Islam because of tableegi jamaat

[@Ahmed-ye5sd]

He critised, The jamaat has some short comings, that they should work on such as having the knowledgable people teaching others, and not followig daef hadeeth etc

[@SAAZ_Zebaish]

@@Ahmed-ye5sd That's not what he said. Please look at the video again.

[@mohammadalii480]

@@Ahmed-ye5sd It has non because it's accepted by allah ta'ala Inshallah soon the arabs will take up dawat tabligh to unite the ummah.

[@MohOz]

Brother FEA can't be bad mouthed more than what it already contains. Scholars knows this. It has to be reprinted and corrected

[@nasimkhan7862]

Masah Allah good job Allah will help you 💪 ❤

[@nodiahmed1]

Mufti SB,pls also clarify what the Sheikh meant by kainaat Mein.... Literal translation: in the universe but translated by you as "in existence". Does the Sheikh believe Allah is within the universe?

[@megalodon3655]

I wouldn’t defend Taweez as people who do black magic out their inscriptions inside the Taweez necklaces I would still say it’s haram and shirk.

[@MasoodKhan-so9hv]

The Neo-Salafees of today have a plastic methodology, and their slogans of Qur’an and Sunnah according to the methodology of the Salaf is only applied when it suits their desires. The issue of the Salaat of Taraweeh is one issue they want to ignore the opinions of the Salaf. I don’t want to get into the what is Sunnah and what is not, but let’s see if they practice what they preach: Ibn Qudamah in his Al-Mugni mentions: The favoured view according to Abu ‘Abd-Allaah is that it is twenty rak’ahs. This was the view of al-Thawri, Abu Hanfeefah and al-Shaafa’i. Maalik said it is thirty-six. What happened to following the Salaf? Didn’t they know the Prophet ﷺ only prayed 8 Rakats? Didn’t they know the known hadith which you often quote? ‎Either they were mysteriously ignorant or you have a better understanding than them? Furthermore, Imam Nawawi states in his Majmoo3: Taraaweeh prayer is Sunnah according to scholarly consensus. Our view is that it is twenty rak’ahs with ten tasleems... Oh Neo-Salafees, it’s easy to show your hypocrisy and highlight your plastic methodology!

[@alfarq]

I wouldn't call myself a salafi but are you really refuting them based on fiqh ikhtilaaf? Lol Besides, salafis are careful with imaam an-Nawawi, I don't understand why you brought him up.

[@GRayfoxasd]

الله يشفيك

[@H.a.q.q]

Jazak Allah Khair

[@aadil1474]

Very helpful

[@kab1r]

As a follower of the athari creed that was a very good answer. Prophets and shuhada are still alive in their graves but not in a worldly sense. Allah knows best in this matter. Allah says the martyrs are not dead they are alive but we perceive it not. But the prophet pbuh can only receive and send salutations but no one can have a full conversation with him. Asking anything from him is also shirk.

[@H.a.q.q]

Indeed

[@Salma_xx]

Cyp tell me what is athari? I want to know more about athari, ashari, maturidi etc. People cancel them and I get confused as I have no knowledge about these. Ty.

[@Naamra123]

@@Salma_xx Athari means the trace - so following the path of the prophet in terms of Allah's attributes and etc. Asharis and Maturidis are the similar to eachother but they are ahlul kalam. They are generally advised against to join because they're whole reason of existence is to destroy greater evil ( mutazillah and jahmiyyah). So they do have some bad stuff but they're still ahlul sunnati wal jammah.

[@FulltimeDuddooScene]

How come majority of the Atharis do not know this? AIM organization eats ass.

[@H.a.q.q]

@@FulltimeDuddooScene Mind your language brother and do tauba. Even if you think that you yourself is on haqq then also ego shouldn't come in the place of dawah and language should always have adab.

[@zia9301]

Serious allegations put by usman on Ulma E deoband

[@MS-Hussain]

After this, my respect for sheikh Usman 👎

[@GRayfoxasd]

I wonder if every single point in this video was refuted with clear evidence, would it make a difference for you?

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@GRayfoxasd Would it make any difference to you if all your points are refuted?

[@darirfanjameel1]

Great Response to all. May Allah preserve you. #Athari

[@JA-jh5gr]

السلام عليكم The speech of shiekh sudais where can it be found?

[@qasmibook8710]

From the office of Darul Uloom Deoband, Saharanpur UP.

[@Abdullah..........]

Go to Alislam production's channel for clarifications about salafism.

[@BlackWOLF-vt3rh]

Osman Farooq, you have messed with the wrong people this time. Be ready for it.

[@muhammadfahadarshad4481]

20:5 ٱلرَّحْمَـٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ ٥ the Most Compassionate, ˹Who is˺ established on the Throne. 7:54 إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍۢ ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ يُغْشِى ٱلَّيْلَ ٱلنَّهَارَ يَطْلُبُهُۥ حَثِيثًۭا وَٱلشَّمْسَ وَٱلْقَمَرَ وَٱلنُّجُومَ مُسَخَّرَٰتٍۭ بِأَمْرِهِۦٓ ۗ أَلَا لَهُ ٱلْخَلْقُ وَٱلْأَمْرُ ۗ تَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّ ٱلْعَـٰلَمِينَ ٥٤ Indeed your Lord is Allah Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, then established Himself on the Throne. He makes the day and night overlap in rapid succession. He created the sun, the moon, and the stars-all subjected by His command. The creation and the command belong to Him ˹alone˺. Blessed is Allah-Lord of all worlds! 67:17 أَمْ أَمِنتُم مَّن فِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ أَن يُرْسِلَ عَلَيْكُمْ حَاصِبًۭا ۖ فَسَتَعْلَمُونَ كَيْفَ نَذِيرِ ١٧ Or do you feel secure that the One Who is in heaven will not unleash upon you a storm of stones. Only then would you know how ˹serious˺ My warning was! 13:2 ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى رَفَعَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ بِغَيْرِ عَمَدٍۢ تَرَوْنَهَا ۖ ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ۖ وَسَخَّرَ ٱلشَّمْسَ وَٱلْقَمَرَ ۖ كُلٌّۭ يَجْرِى لِأَجَلٍۢ مُّسَمًّۭى ۚ يُدَبِّرُ ٱلْأَمْرَ يُفَصِّلُ ٱلْـَٔايَـٰتِ لَعَلَّكُم بِلِقَآءِ رَبِّكُمْ تُوقِنُونَ ٢ It is Allah Who has raised the heavens without pillars-as you can see-then established Himself on the Throne. He has subjected the sun and the moon, each orbiting for an appointed term. He conducts the whole affair. He makes the signs clear so that you may be certain of the meeting with your Lord. 35:10 مَن كَانَ يُرِيدُ ٱلْعِزَّةَ فَلِلَّهِ ٱلْعِزَّةُ جَمِيعًا ۚ إِلَيْهِ يَصْعَدُ ٱلْكَلِمُ ٱلطَّيِّبُ وَٱلْعَمَلُ ٱلصَّـٰلِحُ يَرْفَعُهُۥ ۚ وَٱلَّذِينَ يَمْكُرُونَ ٱلسَّيِّـَٔاتِ لَهُمْ عَذَابٌۭ شَدِيدٌۭ ۖ وَمَكْرُ أُو۟لَـٰٓئِكَ هُوَ يَبُورُ ١٠ Whoever seeks honour and power, then ˹let them know that˺ all honour and power belongs to Allah. To Him ˹alone˺ good words ascend, and righteous deeds are raised up by Him. As for those who plot evil, they will suffer a severe punishment. And the plotting of such ˹people˺ is doomed ˹to fail˺. حَدَّثَنَا مُسَدَّدٌ، حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنِ الْحَجَّاجِ الصَّوَّافِ، حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى بْنُ أَبِي كَثِيرٍ، عَنْ هِلاَلِ بْنِ أَبِي مَيْمُونَةَ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ الْحَكَمِ السُّلَمِيِّ، قَالَ قُلْتُ ‏:‏ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ جَارِيَةٌ لِي صَكَكْتُهَا صَكَّةً ‏.‏ فَعَظَّمَ ذَلِكَ عَلَىَّ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقُلْتُ أَفَلاَ أُعْتِقُهَا قَالَ ‏:‏ ‏"‏ ائْتِنِي بِهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏:‏ فَجِئْتُ بِهَا قَالَ ‏:‏ ‏"‏ أَيْنَ اللَّهُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَتْ ‏:‏ فِي السَّمَاءِ ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏:‏ ‏"‏ مَنْ أَنَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَتْ ‏:‏ أَنْتَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏:‏ ‏"‏ أَعْتِقْهَا فَإِنَّهَا مُؤْمِنَةٌ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ صحيح (الألباني) Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami: I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer. Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani) Reference : Sunan Abi Dawud 3282 similar hadith Sahih Muslim 537a حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ، حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ الْمُقَدَّمِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا حَمَّادُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، قَالَ جَاءَ زَيْدُ بْنُ حَارِثَةَ يَشْكُو فَجَعَلَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ ‏"‏ اتَّقِ اللَّهَ، وَأَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ ‏"‏‏.‏ قَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ لَوْ كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم كَاتِمًا شَيْئًا لَكَتَمَ هَذِهِ‏.‏ قَالَ فَكَانَتْ زَيْنَبُ تَفْخَرُ عَلَى أَزْوَاجِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم تَقُولُ زَوَّجَكُنَّ أَهَالِيكُنَّ، وَزَوَّجَنِي اللَّهُ تَعَالَى مِنْ فَوْقِ سَبْعِ سَمَوَاتٍ‏.‏ وَعَنْ ثَابِتٍ ‏{‏وَتُخْفِي فِي نَفْسِكَ مَا اللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى النَّاسَ‏}‏ نَزَلَتْ فِي شَأْنِ زَيْنَبَ وَزَيْدِ بْنِ حَارِثَةَ‏.‏ Narrated Anas: Zaid bin Haritha came to the Prophet (ﷺ) complaining about his wife. The Prophet (ﷺ) kept on saying (to him), "Be afraid of Allah and keep your wife." Aisha said, "If Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) were to conceal anything (of the Qur'an he would have concealed this Verse." Zainab used to boast before the wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) and used to say, "You were given in marriage by your families, while I was married (to the Prophet) by Allah from over seven Heavens." And Thabit recited, "The Verse:-- 'But (O Muhammad) you did hide in your heart that which Allah was about to make manifest, you did fear the people,' (33.37) was revealed in connection with Zainab and Zaid bin Haritha." Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 7420 Even Imam Abu Haneefa did have not deviated aqeedah like wahdat al Wajood Scholars have quoted many statements from Imaam Abu Haneefah may Allaah have mercy upon him that affirm the attribute of ʻuluww (highness) of Allaah as well as his istiwaa' (establishment) over the Throne. After careful research, we did not find any scholar who quoted otherwise from him. The Hanafi scholar Ibn Abi Al-ʻIzz said in Sharh At-Tahaawiyyah: “The statements of the Salaf (righteous predecessors) about affirming the attribute of ʻuluww are many. For instance, Shaykhul-Islam Abu Ismaaʻeel Al-Ansaari said in his book Al-Farooq with a chain of narration up to Muteeʻ Al-Balkhi that he asked Abu Haneefah about the person who says, 'I do not know whether my Lord is in the heaven or on the earth.' He (Abu Haneefah) said, 'He has committed kufr (disbelief), because Allaah says (what means): {The Most Merciful (Who is) above the Throne established.} [Quran 20:5], and His Throne is above seven heavens.' He further asked Imaam Abu Haneefah, 'What if he says, 'He is above the Throne but I do not know whether the Throne is in the heaven or on the earth.'' Imaam Abu Haneefah replied, 'He is kaafir (a disbeliever) because he denies that He is in the heaven. Whoever denies that He is in the heaven has committed kufr.' Another narrator added, 'Because Allaah is above the highest heaven, and He is supplicated upwards not downwards (i.e. people raise their heads towards the heaven and stretch their hands upwards towards Allaah).'” [Sharh Al-ʻAqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah]

[@ummerfarooq5383]

Am i correct that balaag is for the one who has no power, while dawah is for those who has government and security in the land?

[@rezacny]

Wahdatul wujood is poorly misunderstood as pantheism. It's not. That's why it's name was changed to wahdatul shuhood to prevent confusion. Ibn qayyim himself approved of wahdatul wujood. Check hanafī fiqh channel for wahdatul wujood explanation. Deobandi sufis are NOT pantheists. They are just māturīdī hanafis. And māturīdī aqidah is based on Quran, Sunnah, salaf, and sound reasoning.

[@shayann2228]

Maturidia, Ashaira and Jahmya are like brothers. Ahl Al-Sunnah will always do Takfir in them, because they don't follow Qur'an and Sunnah (and they call the Sunnah to be false, wa Al-Iyadubillah)

[@SirSpamaIot]

@@shayann2228 With this logic, 99.99% of the ummah in history are kuffaar.

[@H.a.q.q]

@@shayann2228 Yes do quick takfir just like the Khwarij

[@H.a.q.q]

@@shayann2228 And fight us ok Khwarij

[@abuzarahmad7176]

@@shayann2228 Alhamdulillah the Ashairah and Maturudiyyah are free from the Aqīdah of the Jahmiyyah kuffar. You have no reasoning to prove that. Alot of the Salafis (not all) have a very similar Aqīdah to the Karamiyyah so they are Neo-Karramis. Karramis were known Mujassims and their Aqīdah was opposed to the Aqīdah of the Salaf. So how do the Salafis claim to follow the Salaf?

[@tugbuggy]

To be honest this video showed some of the positions such as tawassul and lives in the grave May even fall in the first section of ikhtilaafaat that shah wali Allah rh mentioned as there are clear ahaadith proofs and the vast majority of the ummah has agreed upon it too. Furthermore, I think these shaykhs are being a little too forgiving with sh Usman. He made unequivocal statements against deobandis that are now proven to be false from the founders and elders of deoband. He also said in his interview with dawah man that he regrets even sitting with a deoband after his interview with mufti Tariq masood. His views are actually quite extreme, and if really pushed on certain issues, he may even do takfiir.

[@osronsamuel8045]

Where is this video

[@tugbuggy]

@@osronsamuel8045 naseehah sessions channel

[@MrJonblaze5]

Agreed. They're being a little too diplomatic. I would go so far as to say that these "scholars" and what push is one of the leading causes of fitna and confusion in the umma today

[@ShamsherKhan-mh3fs]

Mashallah

[@Mdyasin-zs6dm]

, جزاک اللہ خیرا عثمان بن فاروق کو چاہیے کہ وہ اور پڑھے اور علماء سے رابطہ کرے اور ہمارے علماء کو چاہیے کہ ان کنفیوژن کو دور کرے تاکہ عوام کے سامنے حق اور صاف ہوجائے

[@MS-Hussain]

This salafism is a new concept. This ummah has been following madhab's since last 1400 years. But today a few extreme pseudo-salafis are calling the majority of the ummah as deviants. Really shameful. For the unity and the larger benefit of this ummah, we try to remain silent for unity but a few bunch of ppl like sheikh karim, shamsi etc., they are just going out of the way. And it just becomes important to clear the mind of the ppl that r being adulterated by salafism.

[@GRayfoxasd]

Untrue. The people of the 4 madahib all followed the salaf. What would be the point of narration if you did not get to the salaf. Keep in mind that most people follow the opinions of the khalaf of certain schools of thought and not the original propergators of the mathhab. Also the mathahib of the ones that started the madahib was athari because they always brought forth ahadeeth and Qur'an. It was never vague "trust me bro" opinions. In essence as an ummah we drifted away from Islam and accepted isms into our hearts. Hanafizm, shafizm, malikizm, hanbalizm, sufizms, whateverizm.. Mixing our own whims and desires or those of "shyookh" instead of following قال الله وقال الرسول with the understanding of the people that prophet Mohammad salah allahu 3alaihy wa salam mentioned were the best, the salaf the predecessors, the 3 rightous generations. When ahul al sunnah show evidence people say you are causing devision. حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل

[@zia9301]

السلام علیکم. بلکل درست فرمایا میرے بھائی.

[@zia9301]

And as usual the follower of albani (lanat ul alhae) who rejected more than 30 hadiths of sahi مسلم before he got wasil jahum 😭

[@zia9301]

@ahmadhanbal8497 You are an ignorant person. Ilam kalam is a field which is establish to refute mulhideen.😂

[@GRayfoxasd]

@@zia9301 repent and ask Allah for forgiveness, you givinganat on a dead Muslim is mot permissible, may Allah grant him forgiveness. You are doing lanat on yourself.

[@mdrasid007]

I find the discussion very informative and i find there is hardly any difference between Salafi and Deobandi beliefs .And the main reason for conflict is lack of communication and understanding between the two groups.

[@amirulafiq4371]

Can someone explain the meaning of the following du'a..... "O Allah, I adjure You and I appeal to You by Muhammad the Prophet of Mercy. O Muhammad, I appeal by you to my Lord concerning this need of mine so that it may be met." Which waseela does this fall to?

[@MS-Hussain]

I don't know, but seems very jaiz. It's shirk when someone ask help from anyone other than the creator. If someone says o Allah give me this(without any waseela), that's no less., And perfectly fine. Wallah aalam bisswaab

[@amirulafiq4371]

@@MS-Hussain It's a du'a the Prophet ﷺ taught to a blind man as reported by Uthman ibn Hunaif

[@MS-Hussain]

@@amirulafiq4371 ohh, bro jazakallah

[@rocketleague2136]

Unnecessery time consuming theory. We should really discourage our children to go into hizbi speculative fiqhs and encourage benificial knowledge that will benifit on personal level, and level of muslim community. Other people invest too much time in progress and they're overpowering us

[@juxtapositionMS]

Say this to Wajdi Akkari and his minions. They are the ones who started it.

[@faheemahmed5786]

@@juxtapositionMS Who is Wajdi Akkari?

[@infoage265]

Yes. I've gotten to the point where I consider the argumentation regarding Allah's attributes trivial

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@faheemahmed5786 He is the one who fueled this quarrel among brothers. He likes to create division among Muslims. A hateful madkhali bootlicker living in the UK. A cartoon character.

[@ayeshanaseer3893]

They need to explain these things now because people put allegations against them I saw people on Twitter saying deobandis are pagans and what not auzubillah. No layman deobandi talks about wahdat ul wujood and intricacies of istiwa of Allah (SWT) in real life. It's the salafis who bring up these topics and cause confusion in laymen and waste their times on these debates. Not only does this keep away Muslims from progress but also keeps them away from spirituality and focusing on improving their worship.

[@musha3462]

Very balanced mashallah I think shaykh Usman isn't very educated and talks about things he has no knowledge about.. you have got to remember he's a convert who studied . and very young in the deen he needs to mature

[@juxtapositionMS]

You are right except that he isn't convert.

[@musha3462]

@@juxtapositionMS he said himself he had no faith in Islam check your self

[@ozone2126]

@@musha3462 can you please tell me the name of abu bakr and is father and do this without looking it up please

[@spawnnpwn4166]

He isnt a revert.. He wasnt religious, thats it.

[@hyedefinition1080]

Very young in the deen? He has a son that's a young man now...he's been studying since his teens.

[@Abul_kutub]

ماشاء الله

[@zak2509]

Uthman was embarrassed by dhahabi on his sufi goofy joke. He's not a scholar

[@FR-pl2xp]

You are not qualified to determine who is a scholar and who's not. So enough with the drama

[@juxtapositionMS]

@@FR-pl2xp Neither are you. So stop drama and get lost.

[@GRayfoxasd]

@@juxtapositionMS bring evidence, don't be alligned politically to your hizb. Be a man, act like a Muslim.

[@GRayfoxasd]

@@FR-pl2xp بطل

[@faizahmed8076]

From a former deobandi hanafi to salafi manhaj now, Alhamdulillah... Let me tell you dear Sheikh... With all due respect to your opinions, I live among them in India and I know the problem what Sheikh uthman is talking about. Agreed that salafis become a bit harsh in their stand but the reality is also the fanatical bigoted blind following of the deobandis make them do terrible mistakes in the realm of aqeeda. Result is we have in our masaajids laymen reading from the book of fadaail aamaal which has obvious and clear aqeeda issues. Ghuloo, ie, fanaticsm is rife among those who read that book. Now, dear Sheikh are you going to defend that book too??? Give roundabout explanations overlooking such serious mistakes in that book? Even if we assume that Quranic taaweez are ok, just open any taaweez in the subcontinent n see what it contains... Many deobandis sitting in the mosques practice sihr without knowing that it is sihr... Thier taaweez contains all mumbo jumbo along with Quran aayahs, exactly what saahirs do. And bigoted fanaticsm towards hanafi fiqh at times takes precedence over Clear cut guidance of Quran n sunnah. For eg.. Never have I seen our hanafi mosques conducting salatul istisqa, ie, rain prayers or lunar eclipse prayers here... When all the salafi mosques do with due importance. Dear Sheikh, are you unaware of corruption in the tareeqahs like naqshbandi and other sufi practices which is a part of deobandis? Strange azkaars and words with head shaking and group chanting with lights switched off??? Are you aware that many senior deobandi ulemas today are standing up and voicing against tableegh jamaah and it's ideology today? They are openly talking about the misguidance of tableegh approach... It's a tug of war here between many respectable deobandi ulemas and tableegh jamah here in India. Mufti saeed palanpuri rahimahullah who was sheikhul hadees of deoband who passed away two years back was staunchly against them in his last days. Are you telling me you are unaware of all these or do you prefer brushing all these under the carpet? The same shah waliullah whom you are quoting. Don't you know how much he was against your blind following of madhabs? In so many issues he had taken positions contrary to hanafis and based on saheeh Ahadees, you find that clearly written in his book hujjathulalbaligha. Was maaturidi aqeeda with all it's false taaweels aqeeda of salaf? Anyone from the salaf engaged in that logical deviated rhetoric? Touch your heart n tell us for Allahs sake. Did any one Imam from the blessed generations of salaf talk about abhorrent things like wahdatul wujood? Cmon Sheikh, fear Allah. This wahdatulwujood is so corrupting and dangerous that even many deobandi ulemas want to keep laymen away from it today... But aren't your deobandi books in market today which is filled up with this deviated ideology?? Dear Sheikh... Why are you criticising salafiyyah? Bcoz we oppose wahadatul wujood? Please keep in mind it dwelves into the attributes of Allah in such deep realm that skin trembles to think of such things..... Did Imam abu hanifa rh Or any of the sahaabas who were the best of mankind, did they talk about all these ideological stupidity???? Wallahi, answer me honestly Sheikh... What khair did wahadatul wujood and it's likes bring about to this ummah? And as for what corruption of aqeeda it brought about, well, there are books written by great Imams on this subject. Salafis as people might have their shortcomings but salafiyyah as manhaj is clear and pure way of following Quran and sunnah according to the understanding of the sahaabaas and the early best generations which followed them. Alhamdulillah. Exactly why we see many right thinking laymen as well as scholars from deobandis and barelwis leaving their manhaj and adopting salafiyyah today. You might not accept but the fact remains. Now common refrain from people like you might be that even we deobandis follow the salaf,right? Well if you can prove me which imam from the salaf was a maatureedi? Or adopted naqshbandi and chishti sulook to clean his nafs? And made incumbent upon the masses and scholars to blindly follow only one madhab even if it opposes more clear and more strong positions based on saheeh ahaadees. Few weeks back a towering scholar of deobandis maulana taqi usmani sahib recited fatiha in janaza salah, and yunus jaunpuri rahimahullah of saharanpur madarsa was more inclined towards the aqeeda of salaf and also had adopted many fiqhi positions of what ahlul hadees are upon today... So the traffic is from there to here.... Never from here to there, Alhamdulillah. Open your eyes please and acknowledge the truth. May Allah guide us all in the right way. Aameen.

[@wackypeace1135]

SalafI approach "visiting relatives on Eid, it's not proven from Quran or Hadith." therefore we must refrain from it.

[@faizahmed8076]

@@wackypeace1135 if an unprecedented practice is done in the name of deen, then it is forbidden. if that was your sarcasm, then you need to learn a bit. Bcoz u don't know to differentiate between matters of worship and matters of daily life. So much for your sarcasm😃

[@gumnaam1000]

@@faizahmed8076 how do you differentiate between matters of worship and matters of daily life?

[@wackypeace1135]

@@faizahmed8076 I was quoting a Salafi scholar from a clip on KZbin, but brother gumnaam stole my thunder in response . If you want I can post the link, but clearly you have posted your comment without even watching the entire video! , so not much chance of you watching the link. Fundamental problem with the Salafi, is that that they don't acknowledge that ulemah have different approaches/ methodology or opinions. Salafi approach is that if any practise is not from Quran or Hadith then it should be avoided if rejected. All other groups g have the approach that if there's no clear prohibition from the Quran or Hadith then we allow it. I personally don't have a problem with Salafi brother along as we establish and practice fundamentals such as the 5 pillars. In terms of Aqeedah it is not for the laymen, most people don't know how to read salat properly and you have brothers asking them where is Allah (swt). The fundamental which most laymen believe is surah ikhlas or that there is nothing like him and that is sufficient.

[@faizahmed8076]

@@gumnaam1000 learn from a good scholar... And he will teach u from the authentic sources... Prophet SAW himself taught us that... Learn... No futile argument please

[@syedsyed8048]

Zarooriyat e Deen - since a person can become kaafir by not accepting just one of the zarooriyaat e deen, it’s most critical for every Muslim to understand enough so they may know them in detail. Can someone recommend a good book in urdu or English?

[@AbbaJifarTube]

I am neither deobandi nor any sects,Dr.Zakir Naik said to the hindu people who used to say that we believe in one God then why we need convert to Islam? Then Dr.Zakir said all similarities which make us one are to believe in Allah (one God) and prophet Muhammad which all scripture guide to it then why reject unity but speak unity? .we are Muslims but not deobandi

[@qazitasawur]

Shaykh Uthman has some problems in getting along with muslims who disagree with his understanding. If he is proposing that the athari understanding is the only correct and closest to the truth, then he has clearly misunderstood what Ahle Sunnat Wal Jammah means. No one creedal group is better than the other. Simple. This is irreversible difference which cannot be undone. It has 1400+ years of scholarship behind these 3 creedal schools of Asharis, Maturudis & Atharis.

[@alfarq]

No one is better than the other? It is not about better but about falsehood. Maturidiyyah and Ash'ariyyah are just Djahmiyyah/Kullaabiyyah products that were even refuted by imaam Ahmed.

[@qazitasawur]

@@alfarq then you are de facto declaring 90% of Ummah as outside the fold of Sunni Islam. Good luck with that on the day of judgement. If Imam Ahmad RA has said that, thats his independent conclusion and which is respected but is not accepted by 90% of Ummah who are Hanafis, Shafis and Malikis.

[@GRayfoxasd]

@@qazitasawur ashari and maturidi's started 300 years after hijra it is not ahul alsunnah wal jama3a it is mashgoog firqa. 90 percent of the people pray 5 times a day and fast and do zakat and are ignorant of anything else and assume by fitra that Allah is up. It is only deviant imams that drill their misguidence into people that cause them to go astray. It should be more evident that the ummah is still in dissaray because of this creedal isssue with most of it. Sub7anallah wa bas

[@alfarq]

@@qazitasawur No, I'm not. Learn the difference between 'aqeedah and fiqh. He refuted based on 'aqeedah. That's what the whole discussion between Ash'ariyyah, Maturidiyyah, and Atharis is about. Do you understand this differentiation? If not, delete your comment as you are just blindly moving people's hearts based on baatil. Following one of the 4 madhaahib doesn't say what 'aqeedah one follows so before you make such statements about yawm al-qiyaamah, know what you are saying. Just because one is following the maaliki, shaafi'i, or hanafi madhab, it doesn't say what his 'aqeedah is and what he accepts or not; are you ready to testify on yawm al-qiyaamah about that lie about 90% not accepting his opinion? I wonder where you drew up this statistic as it's complete non-sense. Imaam Ahmed and the rest of ahlussunnah waldjamaa'ah refuted these creeds of 'aqeedah based on their (speculative) interpretation of Allah's Asmaa was-Sifaat using kalaam that stems from the Djahmiyyah.

[@qazitasawur]

@@alfarq The so called "manhaj" which he follows and finds it to be the only truth is only followed by 1/3rd of Hanbalites who follow Ibn Taymiyyah RA and who are mostly found in Arabian Peninsula. 650 million out of 700 million muslims of Indian subcontinent who represent 1/3 of entire ummah follow the Hanafite school which is not athari but maturudi. The next 1/3rd is follower of Shafi school which has 300million followers with an absolute majority in Indonesia and rest in Palestine and Iraq etc and who follow Ashari Aqeeda. The remaining 1/3rd of ummah is divided between around 60-70% who follow Maliki school found in Magreb who are again Ashari and rest are followers of Hanbalite school only found in Arabian peninsula in majority and there too is has 3 different sub schools. One of them is the school of Ibn Taymiyyah RA and he follows them. So yes, it is with absolute certainty and backed with statistical proof that majority of ummah is not athari infact athari aqeedah is only followed by less than 20% of ummah at maximum. So please, take a seat and stop labelling people here and there with all sorts of sophisticated designations.

[@reflection5057]

@Daniel haqiqatjou @yasir nadeeem wajidi. 1. Shaikh Yaasir cherry picked from the various differing position of the deobandi scholars to his convenience but he clearly did not cite evidence from the authoritative book of deobandi Aqeeda: 'Al Muhannad a'la Mufannad' and this seems to be a very subtly planned convenience! 2. The difference between athari-salafi beleif and the deobandi-Maturidi beleif is not on peripheral issues as Shaikh Yaasir tried to potray, let me list a few for example: A) The belief of deobandi-maturidi that eemaan neither increases nor decreases. B) The deobandi-maturidi beleif that people in paradise won't have beatific vision of Allah azz wa jall. C) The deobandi beleive that spritual blessing can be accessed from the dead through muraaqba near their graves! D) seeking help from the dead with the belief that the real agent is Allah is permissible with the ulama of deoband All of this and much have been explicitly mentioned in al Muhannad a'la Mufannad. As for wahdatul wajood, the deobandi ulama DO NOT consider the concept put across by ibne Arabi as incorrect! And this should suffice to show their inconsistency in matters of aqeedah! All said, indeed, some of the scholars of deoband were genius and have left amazing corpus behind them which an expert student of knowledge may benefit from, especially from the works of Allama kashmiri Rahimahullah. May Allah forgive all of us and unite us upon the salafi aqeedah and manhaj. Wallahu a'alam bis sawaab

[@ayaan6373]

Noooooooooo how can he clear the missconceptions😭😡🤬😭😭🤬🤬😭😭😭

[@zak2509]

Shaykh uthman? He doesn't close to a scholar. Has anyone heard how he recites quran and hadith? So many mistakes. Who on earth gave him this certificate.

[@FR-pl2xp]

Like what mistakes?

[@Melvinwateren]

Who is a Scholar/shaykh? Condition 1: The person has the message that Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) came with - Knows everything of the Qur’an (in depth) - Knows everything of the Hadith (in depth) Condition 2: The person knows the different Qira’aat of the Qur’an Condition 3: The person knows the statements of the Companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) - Knows the differences of opinions amongst the Companions of the Prophet (ﷺ) - And knows the different positions they hold on the disputed topics - Knows the reasons for the difference of opinion - Knows what’s abrogated and what’s not abrogated - Knows how to extract benefits (from the texts) Condition 4: The person does not follow strange views - The person follows that which is in line with way of the Prophet (ﷺ) and the Companions Condition 5: They are correct the majority of the time - Scholars are not infallible but they are mostly correct - Those who are wrong most of the time, they are not scholars Condition 6: They can defend the religion of Islam - They are not susceptible to doubts - They defend the religion from people who want to deviate - They do not concede to the innovators

[@aali8874]

Wa'alaikum assalam wa rahmatu'LLAHI wa barakatuh

[@atravellerwithaquraan5365]

I live in South Africa which has one of the largest and staunchest Deobandi/Tablighi Communities in the world. Daniel knows this because he visited us here a few years back. The Deobandis have multiple issues, first of all most of them incline to the The Maturidi/Ashari creed. It is well known that the scholars of Ahlul Sunnah refuted these creeds throughout the last 1100 years of Islām. Prior to that we can see that the Imams of Hadith, Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawūd etc and the fuqahah, Imam Abu Haneefah, Imām Malik, Imam Shāfi, Imam Ahmed as well as those before them (May Allah be pleased with them), were all upon the creed of Ahlul Sunnah, they did not inteperate the attributes of Allah away from their apparent meanings, unless in specific cases in which they had an evidence from the Qur'aan, Sunnah or Sahabah to do so. My question is if the Deobandi's are on the Haqq as you say, they why are the opposed this belief of the Salaf regarding the Names and Attributes of Allah سبحانه وتعالى? Secondly, we see majority of the Deobandi's supporting the view of blind Taqleed of their Imāms, they say they follow Imām Abu Haneefah, when in reality they don't really follow him in all matters. Blind Taqleed over following a well proven Sunnah is opposed the understanding of the Salaf and this is well known. They also believe in the concept of "Bid'ah Hasanah" in the deen. This is against the clear statements of the Messenger of Allah who said that "every misguidance is going astray." So therefore we see the Deobandi's freely making the congregational dua after Salaah, loud dhikr in Unision, supporting Sufi Movements, a lot of them believe that it's permissible to visit the Messenger's grave and then ask him to intercede to Allah for them (this is Shirk), they support the Tabligh Jamaat whole heartedly without correcting their faults, they frequently quote weak hadith without mentioning that the hadith it's weak and the list goes on with clear issues like these which are in opposition to the understanding of the Salaf. If you ask them if they support or are against the Salafis, the majority of them will not hesitate to say that they are against the Salafis. So the question is if they are against the Salafis, it must be because of certain beliefs and practices etc which they hold that which is in disagreement with the Salafis. So the matter is that either the Salafis or Deobandi's are correct in these fundamental issues which divide them. We ask you Daniel, or the Deobandi's to highlight these matters so that we may discuss them and see who is following the correct understanding of the Salaf in these matters. Do not blurr these issues for the masses, Allah, سبحانه وتعالى and His Messenger has left the Ummah upon clarity. We are tolerant in correct Ijtihādi matters, but not in fundamental beliefs and principles of the deen in which Ahlul Sunnah have been united upon since the first generations of Islām. May Allah سبحانه وتعالى guide us to the truth, the Muslims must unite upon the truth and strive to adhere to it. This is how we will earn the Victory of Allah for the Muslim Ummah as this is how Allah granted Victory to the Sahaba and early generations of Islām.

[@Takfirienrager]

Allah humma barik

[@GRayfoxasd]

بارك الله فيك أخي؛ وفقك الله.

[@shamsudeenmacseain5157]

Your triumphant post is full of nonsense. I have to waste my time now to straighten out your words of fitna for those who you might have confused. Athari, Ashari and Maturidu are Ahle Sunna wal Jama'a. Differences in opinion are accepted in secondary matters, each school of thought has done ijtihad to access what they believe to be the authentic position of the first generations. To reject this is to reject the vast majority of accepted Sunni Scholars of the millenia. Dangerous position to take for a lay Muslim like you in akhiruz Zamann. Taqleed you have also rejected. Taqleed to a madhab or Imam has always been the way of Ahlul Sunna. There has been no major imam or scholar of Islam who didn't attach to a Madhab. Suddenly you've figured it out? You've rejected 'Bidah Hasan' when this is a term coined by the Salaf themselves. Only an ignorant person can make such a blunder. Debate the point with Umar ibn al Khattab, then Imam Shafii, and the list continues. Who are you again? Which Deobandi scholar can you quote that states that duaa after salah is wajib or sunna? If they do not attach a shar'i value to it then it is not deemed ibaadah and is not a bidah. Jamaat Tabligh are making great sacrifice with their health wealth and time in calling people to Tawheed and Sunna. Allah calls those who strive in the way of Allah with their wealth and their own selves as 'as- Sadiqoon'. Do you disagree? Their points are Yaqeen in Kalima, Salah, Ilm and Dhikr, Ikraam of Muslims, Ikhlas, and Dawa il Allah. If you have a problem with any of these then you need your head checked. Weak hadith are mustahab to use for fadhail in encouraging towards good deeds and warning against evils. This is agreed upon by scholars of Ahlul Sunna. By opposing them you are being a deviant and devaluing weak hadith to the level of fabricated hadith, so sit with the scholars and learn this subject before you speak. Doing salaam, asking Rasulullah sullAllahu alayhi wa sallam at his grave for his intercession is not shirk. Shirk is in the case where someone attributes divine attributes to other than Allah. Is giving salaam to Prophet sullAllahu alayhi wa sallam at his grave also shirk? Don't talk big without authority. Is Salafi or Deobandi correct? So called Salafees are delusional in a way that Deobandi aren't. They do taqleed to their salafi scholars just as other schools do taqleed to theirs, the difference being that the Salafis do taqleed of the opinions of modern day Saudi approved scholars, who think that by merely repeating 'we're on the Haq, the way of the Salaf, the sahih manhaj, the authentic sunna' etc that it magically becomes true, while the likes of Deobandis do taqleed of the actual Salaf us Saliheen who were people of taqleed, sanad, ijaaza and madhhab. Where's your sanad? Boys like you need to focus on your own relationship with Allah subhanahu wa ta aala, in fact we all do. This is not the time, and people like you are not qualified to spew this junk on social media according to your hawa. I advise myself and you to do duaa: Allahumma arinal haqqa haqqa warzuqna tiba'a Wa arinal baatila baatila warzuqna ijtinaaba. I'm fully confident that if you do this duaa after each 5 salah, or at the accepted times for even a few days, if you are sincere Allah subhanahu wa ta aala will show you the correct path on this matter. Was salaamu alaykum

[@Qytrh]

Can't believe you put following a madhab here. Does that mean all the great scholars of the past are all misguided, as majority post 4th century followed a madhab. Secondly, either way you will be doing taqleed of someone unless you have a holistic understanding of Islamic sciences. You will be doing taqleed of the ijtihad of Albani or Ibn Uthaymeen or Shaykh Uthman, etc. and you have to, and you are whether you realise or not, because you haven't mastered hadith science nor usool or nahw and so on, so you can't even UNDERSTAND the words of hadith and Quran completely and the methodology of extracting rulings. Nobody is "rejecting clear hadith". It's just about the ways you interpret hadith, and apply usool, eg which hadith is considered stronger, how to deal with two authentic hadith/athar that seemingly contradict. Such that many times it's just as simple as different fuqaha translating words differently through rules of nahw or even huroof. Eg, one faqih may argue that the "ف" in a hadith is for عطف and another may so no rather it's for so and so. This is an old salafi position, many modern salafi scholars themselves affirm following a madhab such as Sheikh shuway'ir. Even salafi duat such as Abu taymiyyah follow madhahib (he follows shafi madhab I believe). This is a ridiculous position.

[@Qytrh]

Continuing from my previous reply, this is the issue, that often individuals who have little understanding of Islam, don't understand Arabic, haven't learnt ilm hadith or any science. Many have not even done hifz or Quran, infact many may have just recently accepted islam or just recently become practicing and then they hear salafis online making things seem very black and white, and because they have little knowledge, they think this must be correct and start doing BLIND TAQLEED of salafi scholars. And they ARE doing blind taqleed because they can't understand the greater reasonings behind conclusions these salafi scholars come to (May Allah have mercy on them) in terms of nahw, usool, ilm hadith, ilm Quran and so forth

[@thekillerphython]

Yeah there are some positive things from Deoband Madrassa but there are also some acts that are not according to Islam at all but the problem with these deobandis is that instead of rectifying their mistakes, they will find insane justification to justify their wrong actions

[@Abdullah..........]

Not more than the pseudo salafies!

[@MrSaifkamal]

Not even close to the rigidity and arrogance of (pseudo) Super Salafis(Madkhalis). Madkhalis Murjias are some of the worst arrogant trash that you'll find.