I don't get what's the algorithm property that's making the split of two different logarithms
@nazgulwraith22817 жыл бұрын
thank you ... I forgot you need to flip the log when changing the sign and I was wondering why my calculations were wrong
@thelittlemaster0077 жыл бұрын
One question sir. When the negative log is multiplied with (H3O) & (A-), the denominator (HA) should be come both for H3O and A- as a denominator, but you put only for A- , while multiplying with -log on RHS of the equation . I m mentioning my doubt at 1.40 mind of the video. Kindly help me out professor
@smutib28637 жыл бұрын
I think he fucked up somewhere and got a slightly different equation from what I have seen, but his heart is in the right direction
@hisyamhasbi82575 жыл бұрын
Isnt this a multiplication? So the denominator should only come for either h30 or a-
@eliashowe84183 жыл бұрын
It looks different because we're used to seeing pH on the left side of the equation, not pKa. Rearrange the equation so pH is on the left, and you will see that his derivation is correct.
@favouronah126110 ай бұрын
Great video!!! Understood it at once Thank youuu🥰🤝
@favourafinni3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much, so simplified
@DaViDsMoMmA1110 жыл бұрын
it's supposed to be pH=pka + log([A]/[HA])
@thefenerbahcesk41565 жыл бұрын
so many damn versions
@diamonds59904 жыл бұрын
@@thefenerbahcesk4156 I think that is why Henderson hasselbalch is just an approximation.
@mohamudomar58283 жыл бұрын
This is the right equation.
@Hyerayuna Жыл бұрын
That's bcs he wrote ([HA]/[A]) not ([A]/[HA])
@brightbright43183 ай бұрын
is pH -logH+ or -logH30-??? 😔
@kristinawashington17736 жыл бұрын
Truly enjoyed the video.
@jonqn076 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining!
@simranjoharle42207 жыл бұрын
In this equation...why don't we consider the ions contributed by the salt?
@chemistNATE7 жыл бұрын
If you are adding salt, I assume the question has you adding the weak acid and conjugate base directly. For example, acetic acid and sodium acetate. The salt brings the conjugate base of the acid (A- in the video's case) and it definitely contributes to the [A-]=[base] part of the equation.
@simranjoharle42207 жыл бұрын
Got it......can we also put it this way ......the concentration of ions furnished by the salt is way more than that produced by the acid , so we ignore the concentration of ions produced by the acid and directly plug in the concentration of the salt in the equation.....I was actually confused about how do u included the concentration of committee base as well as the salt in the equation....and ur explanation makes sense....thank u so much.
@ProPlayer-ey2dw7 жыл бұрын
Thanks boi
@kripashankarshukla40737 жыл бұрын
Super helpful video
@manarsaleh2827 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much 👌👌
@lostxtwis8 жыл бұрын
The Bestt everr ,thanks🙌
@jawardamara91033 жыл бұрын
There was a little error though
@efangnsan3074 Жыл бұрын
Thanks boss.
@balarajbingi17336 жыл бұрын
Good and thank you
@jaiprakashnirala52884 жыл бұрын
Tq so much sir
@charleszack13296 жыл бұрын
Is that a Canadian accent?
@Дэни-д6ю6 жыл бұрын
Nah, sound American to me
@WinkThatCouture4 жыл бұрын
I hear it too lol and I'm not even Canadian, mostly when he says "ouuuuwt"