Did Bruins get robbed? 😤 + Playoff Player Power Rankings 🚀 | The Drop

[@steveb1962]

Bennett will do it again, it's his nature. He's smart and knows when to pick his spots, when you're most vulnerable.

[@NicEeEe843]

Coyle was already well in the crease in front of swayman moments before Bennett touched him, the only question is did Sam’s push fully cause the blockage, was Charlie far enough away that the push was the thing that caused swayman to not be able to slide? No, Charlie was already well into the blue/crease in the literal exact location swayman had to be to make that play just moments before Sam touched him, so without the push swayman still most likely can’t make that save with Coyle right in the way, or at least taking the goal away is very hard and it should be a hard call since it’s difficult to make the argument it was Sam’s fault when Charlie was already in the exact space Jeremy had to be before the push was initiated

[@foxy1340]

@@NicEeEe843 don't need to comment this twice and you're wrong but think what you'd like.

[@Desert-Father]

That's not being "smart" that's being a psychopath.

[@steveb1962]

@@Desert-Father You said it not me. That's why players fear him. Wouldn't want him coming after me!

[@user-Chris-n3n]

You do know, Marchand initiated the contact, right. 😂😂😂😂 morons

[@Remmy0930]

Robbed? Not robbed of the loss. The loss is on them. Robbed in regard to a goal that should have never counted? Absolutely. There's never been a more clear cut case of goalie interference. Even IF they say "well Swayman wouldn't have made that save anyway"... how do you know? We'll never know because his teammate was crosschecked INTO him. I hate the B's... but I hate 1 sided officiating even more. And if anybody can't see that the NHL has clearly given the refs their marching orders for this series I can't help you. It's been just as egregious in the Oilers/Canucks series.

[@awwwshucks443]

You know on a rebound that's not interference.

[@Chilly753]

@@awwwshucks443you are incorrect haha

[@NicEeEe843]

The bruins have gotten away with so much and pretend like they didn’t 🤣. The E rod elbow, the high stick that directly lead to a good game 1, the 6 consecutive cross checks done on a Panther that was misssd, pasta assaulting Lundel 🤣. There’s been bad calls on both sides, but to pretend like Boston is being robbed when a few missed called isn’t going to fix a team that recorded as many shots all series as the panthers did on a single game. The whining and the complaining feed panthers fans fyi 🤣

[@NicEeEe843]

@@Chilly753 Coyle was already well in the crease in front of swayman moments before Bennett touched him, the only question is did Sam’s push fully cause the blockage, was Charlie far enough away that the push was the thing that caused swayman to not be able to slide? No, Charlie was already well into the blue/crease in the literal exact location swayman had to be to make that play just moments before Sam touched him, so without the push swayman still most likely can’t make that save with Coyle right in the way, or at least taking the goal away is very hard and it should be a hard call since it’s difficult to make the argument it was Sam’s fault when Charlie was already in the exact space Jeremy had to be before the push was initiated

[@awwwshucks443]

@@Chilly753 Rule 69.7: In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

[@imspeed535]

As a cats fan I will say I don’t 100% agree with the call, but you also cannot win a game with 18 shots and less than 10 across the last 2 periods (i might be wrong but that’s what I heard)

[@Jessylll]

I know I’m so tired of hearing about this already. I can’t wait until the Bruins are eliminated.

[@humanbeing2420]

Fine but that has nothing to do with whether the call was correct.

[@sean2015]

@Jesyll and as a Bruins fan I'm tired of Panthers fans using completely irrelevant criteria to justify the non-call. You can't say _"Well, we should be able to high stick or hook or trip as much as we want, because the other team sucks anyway"_ Personally I couldn't care less about SOG's because I've witnessed the Bruins put up 40 shots against goalies like Binnington or Vasilevsky and it got them nowhere. Sometimes quality matters more than quantity. _Oh sean2015 wahhhh! You're juth an ignorant Bruins fan boo-hoo, Both-ton thucks hahaha, our team is thooo wonderful because we have warm winters and no thtate income tax, cope."_

[@imspeed535]

@@humanbeing2420 to be fair Boston wasn’t playing that great, sure they could’ve awoken had it gone to ot but it’s not very likely

[@NicEeEe843]

Coyle was already well in the crease in front of swayman moments before Bennett touched him, the only question is did Sam’s push fully cause the blockage, was Charlie far enough away that the push was the thing that caused swayman to not be able to slide? No, Charlie was already well into the blue/crease in the literal exact location swayman had to be to make that play just moments before Sam touched him, so without the push swayman still most likely can’t make that save with Coyle right in the way, or at least taking the goal away is very hard and it should be a hard call since it’s difficult to make the argument it was Sam’s fault when Charlie was already in the exact space Jeremy had to be before the push was initiated

[@auralstream]

41 SOG to 18 for Boston. No, they didn't get robbed.

[@lime7494]

45 EDM shots to Vancouver's 18. Pick a new argument

[@windyaft]

Love the Marchand got Marchanded. Love that Bruins are getting bad call cause they always seem to get the benefit. It's amazing.

[@user-Chris-n3n]

The rulebook doesn’t say one thing and then they do another keep reading the rules. Sam Bennett was not the attacker. He was the rebound player. So that means you have to go look under rebounds and loose pucks. Read what it says under rebounds and loose pucks it’s completely different. But don’t finish reading the rules they just wanna stop where it suits them. Not to mention coyle was already in the crease before the love tap. Plus coyle embellished the love tap.

[@LiveFreeOrDie2A]

All of you clowns referencing rule 69.7 what don’t you understand about ATTEMPTING TO PLAY A LOOSE PUCK and INCIDENTAL? The shove in Coyle’s back isn’t playing a loose puck, he does that AFTER. The shove is by nature NOT incidental, but DELIBERATE. So, NO- rule 69.7 doesn’t mean shit

[@Desert-Father]

Not a Boston or Florida fan for the record. The officials have been horrible this year. This is not acceptable in a major league sport. The NHL officials are completely unaccountable. This is not acceptable. And to continue to blow calls this badly in the playoffs is egregious. Regardless of the GI rule, how does that cross check get missed? You have two referees on the ice including one a couple feet from the player committing the cross check. What is that ref looking at?!? Officiating this poor undermines the credibility of the sport.

[@etahhcumosevahi]

Purely under rule 69.3 goal would have been overturned. But the clause 69.7 makes it a good goal. These 2 keep repeating 69.3. But fails to mention the clause in 69.7.

[@LiveFreeOrDie2A]

All of you clowns referencing rule 69.7 what don’t you understand about ATTEMPTING TO PLAY A LOOSE PUCK and INCIDENTAL? The shove in Coyle’s back isn’t playing a loose puck, he does that AFTER. The shove is by nature NOT incidental, but DELIBERATE. So, NO- rule 69.7 doesn’t mean shit

[@humanbeing2420]

I’ve yet to hear or read anyone (other than Panther fans and players) say they agree with the call. I’ve heard a few say they can understand how the goal wasn’t waived off, but that’s not agreement with the call.

[@rickyrougs]

what about mark messier

[@NicEeEe843]

@@rickyrougsjust saw marks video, you know when mark disagrees with you that’s not a good sign you’re right 😂😂.. Coyle was already well in the crease in front of swayman moments before Bennett touched him, the only question is did Sam’s push fully cause the blockage, was Charlie far enough away that the push was the thing that caused swayman to not be able to slide? No, Charlie was already well into the blue/crease in the literal exact location swayman had to be to make that play just moments before Sam touched him, so without the push swayman still most likely can’t make that save with Coyle right in the way, or at least taking the goal away is very hard and it should be a hard call since it’s difficult to make the argument it was Sam’s fault when Charlie was already in the exact space Jeremy had to be before the push was initiated

[@awwwshucks443]

Rule 69.7: In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

[@NicEeEe843]

@@awwwshucks443the truth hurts for Boston fans

[@joepasquini7396]

I agree with the call and I’m a NJD fan. You can’t review a missed call besides offsides, goalie interference, and a few other things. Swayman wasn’t making that save, missed cross check but good goal!

[@castle4640]

As a lifelong pro wrestling fan I enjoyed your comparisons! Very accurate. Guerrero would be proud of Bennett in this series for sure

[@awwwshucks443]

Bennett's goal is fine. In the rule book it says on a rebound contact is fine.

[@bradleyroth9870]

False NHL rule 69.1 best read it. It's no goal for the sucker puncher.

[@awwwshucks443]

@@bradleyroth9870 you miss the except on .7 it says that incidental contact when going after a rebound is fine. Levar Burton would be displeased with your willingness to read the whole story.

[@awwwshucks443]

@@bradleyroth9870 here you go: Rule 69.7: In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

[@bradleyroth9870]

@@awwwshucks443 No i read it 69.1 says no goal.

[@awwwshucks443]

@@bradleyroth9870 I see you've discovered a long river in Africa.

[@jcg9998]

The call by the replay officials was correct whether you like it or not. It's the rule that everyone has a problem with. It wasn't a Panther player that interfered with the goalie. The crosscheck took place outside of the goalie area and it wasn't called. It was a Bruin player that interfered and that makes all the difference. Replay rules don't allow a penalty to be called unless it was involved with goalie interference. It makes no difference if the crosscheck took place right next to the goalie area or at center ice.

[@jcg9998]

@@Faceplant9495 Yes, you can say it was a terrible call. I'm just pointing out that it can't be overturned by replay. That is the only point I'm making because I keep hearing... I want to hear the explanation for not changing the call...

[@crowtubecrozier2857]

The way Bruins are playing lately, the Bruins can make any goalie look good!!

[@jcg9998]

The Bruins and their fans should be on their knees, kissing the feet of the NHL executives for giving them a way to deflect away the fact that they are being badly beaten.

[@notoriouseagle1074]

HA! Explain to me ONE bad call that's gone against Florida?

[@bradleyroth9870]

Arrogance with a touch of denial. It's interference rule 69.1

[@lime7494]

@@notoriouseagle1074 i mean, mcavoy's hit against reinhart at the start of the game but that's grasping at straws

[@jcg9998]

@@notoriouseagle1074 I'm making no argument about the fairness of the officiating. I was only making the argument that the NHL was not siding with Florida on the call. They didn't have a choice. They can't call crosschecking because it's not allowed. There was no goaltender interference by Bennett. A Bruin interfered due to being 'crosschecked' into the goalie. Your problem is with the rule or the officiating but not with the NHL.

[@jgabriel6657]

Forsling snubbed

[@NicEeEe843]

Coyle was already well in the crease in front of swayman moments before Bennett touched him, the only question is did Sam’s push fully cause the blockage, was Charlie far enough away that the push was the thing that caused swayman to not be able to slide? No, Charlie was already well into the blue/crease in the literal exact location swayman had to be to make that play just moments before Sam touched him, so without the push swayman still most likely can’t make that save with Coyle right in the way, or at least taking the goal away is very hard and it should be a hard call since it’s difficult to make the argument it was Sam’s fault when Charlie was already in the exact space Jeremy had to be before the push was initiated

[@frankfilippis]

Good goal puck was in the crease before contact

[@bradleyroth9870]

@@frankfilippis NHL rule 69.1 says it's not good.

[@awwwshucks443]

@@bradleyroth9870 69.7 good goal. Rule 69.7: In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

[@bradleyroth9870]

@@awwwshucks443 No goal bad call.

[@awwwshucks443]

@@bradleyroth9870 keep digging

[@tonyv.8781]

He was already in the crease blocking Swayman.

[@notchonachos]

If you switch and the defence pushes Bennet out of play and takes away the opportunity there is no call, so stop qq'ing about the goal. Not a Cats fan just an old school let them play fan.

[@LiveFreeOrDie2A]

Well one’s allowed and one’s not, there is no “reverse the roles” argument so wtf is your point? Lmfao

[@notchonachos]

@@LiveFreeOrDie2A Clearly both are allowed and you've never played hockey to understand shoving for position is legal. Cross checking in the back is not. There was no cross check. The Boston player was weak or took a dive to fall based on a hand shove.

[@user-Chris-n3n]

Even Mark Messier said that was not a cross Check stop crying people.

[@patrickparrish4510]

Lol boston is absolutely pathetic, they r about to be out of the playoffs on their ass 😂😅😂

[@tsak912]

1 Star Wars reference. That’s the limit.

[@MicrowaveOvenmit]

How about all the goals with the lightning? Refs are totally backing the panthers.

[@itsyeboi631]

Lol. I’ll agree officiating has been horrible but if you don’t think the Panthers have been dominant in their wins then you are just in denial

[@rjhollinger]

Lightning had double the power plays… totally for the Panthers 🙄

[@rickyrougs]

If I was the NHL, I wouldnt be ensuring my cash cow teams won and these series went to 6-7. florida is not a cash cow team and these series are ending too quickly.

[@mrp2561]

Ya, iffy reffing, but if a team can't muster more than 3 shots in 20 minutes, then too bad so sad. Also, wonder if there'd be so much whining if the B's had won? Ya want some cheese with that wine?? 🤤

[@dmitrykim3096]

What Flrodia has to do with bad refs?

[@rickyrougs]

the bruins havent played a good game since game 1. they cant get shots on net and only had 2 SOG in the third period of a pivotal game (in which they we’re losing half the period).

[@elosogonzalez8739]

Bruins Robbed? TORONTO MADE THE CALL! They were outshot and out played! QUIT BELLY ACHING! Boston STILL HAS A CHANCE OR DO THEY? START PRACTICING THE EXCUSES!

[@ryguy92]

Idk the Bennett goal seemed like a weak love tap.

[@davidmanory4342]

NHL teams are corrupt. I think I am done with the NHL

[@j.kendall83]

Yo take it easy on Maurice 😂

[@jkranites]

Bennett and Marchand are both cheap. SO i would totally believe the Eddie Guerrero set up!

[@jeffreyyoung8727]

Bettman Maurice Bennett 3way rainbow 🌈

[@crowtubecrozier2857]

Florida paid the reffs off

[@frankfilippis]

no they read the rule. book 69.7 Rebounds and Loose Pucks - In a rebound situation, or where a goalkeeper and attacking player(s) are simultaneously attempting to play a loose puck, whether inside or outside the crease, incidental contact with the goalkeeper will be permitted, and any goal that is scored as a result thereof will be allowed.

[@crowtubecrozier2857]

Correctly said, I just don't like it!!

[@felixvasquez1570]

Robbed ?😂😂 yeah okay

[@4lifeskim]

Look up rule 69.7 you big hockey KZbin expert

[@LiveFreeOrDie2A]

All of you clowns referencing rule 69.7 what don’t you understand about ATTEMPTING TO PLAY A LOOSE PUCK and INCIDENTAL? The shove in Coyle’s back isn’t playing a loose puck, he does that AFTER. The shove is by nature NOT incidental, but DELIBERATE. So, NO- rule 69.7 doesn’t mean shit

[@paulstensland3800]

Stop the gaslighting bruins lost. They played poorly they thought they could just beat up Florida

[@anmiles18]

Bruins played poorly? I thought Flordia played like garbage until the Bennett's goal. Shots have nothing to do with the outcome. The Bruins had 2 goals on 5 shots in the 1st. Bruins fans are pissed that we're facing Flordia and the refs. Flordia should be pissed too, because the refs are sowing doubt in this series.

[@nore8141]

No kidding the Bruins got robbed a few times in this series

[@NicEeEe843]

The e rod elbow not called? The high stick that lead directly to a goal in game 1, the 6 consecutive cross checks on one of the panthers, pasta assaulting Lundel. They robbed themselves by putting up as many shots all series so far as the cats have in one single game. Get made, stay mad

[@rythmblood27]

For Bennett to say he doesn’t have time to pre-meditate punch in that situation is absolutely Rediculous. It’s called timing. Martial artists and fighters practice landing quick punches when closing in on an opponent. It’s very easy to practice. Especially when an opponent is not expecting a punch at all. This is just as silly as these refs thinking there was no goalie interference.

[@villekarkkainen1314]

have u ever played in the nhl and know the speed of the game? no? ou i didnt think so

[@bradlipshaw1033]

Stop whining. We beat you last year and will beat you this year because the Panthers are the better team. The Bruins need to play the game and quit whining!!

[@user-Chris-n3n]

Go CATS

[@rubberstick2301]

Boston whining.

[@Chilly753]

B’s fan - Refs have been atrocious. Bennett should be suspended, doesn’t matter if he didn’t do it on purpose. For FL fans that say McAvoys hit was interference - the puck was maybe an inch from Reinharts stick and he was clearly about to touch the puck. That being said - the Bruins have been absolutely dominated pretty much the whole series and don’t deserve to win. BUT let’s be real this series could (somehow) be 2-2 if refs called the game right

[@windyaft]

Bennett should be suspended for doing to Marchand what he consistently dishes out? Nah man, it's time to pay up.

[@KRG-Unit]

Womp womp. Marchand is lucky he wasn't penalized for interference because that puck was cleared from Bennett's stick before he tried to blindside him. The only times you got reffed was the non GI call game 4 and a missed hold on Ekblad that was called GI against Boston game 3. Im sure there are more, but those are the ones to be upset over.

[@Chilly753]

@@windyaft it doesn’t matter what Marchand has done 😂 it’s pretty clear that Bennet suckered him in the face whether it was an “accident” or not

[@Chilly753]

@@KRG-Unit not whining that’s just the truth. Was a dirty play by Bennet even if it was an accident. The refs aren’t the reason the bruins are losing, but let’s be honest they’ve shafted the B’s more than a couple times.

[@windyaft]

@Chilly753 nah, you can't have it both ways forever. It caught up with him, and the refs are letting it slide in the post-season. It has everything to do with his past. Don't be obtuse.

[@TheThejiaka]

yall are all still butt hurt from having the best regular season pts total in nhl history and getting run from the playoffs in rd 1 by the 8 seed who happens to be the team that is kicking your azz currently in rd. 2. get over it. and btw, seeing the biggest rat in nhl history (most suspensions in nhl history) get out ratted for once is like winning the lottery for everyone except boston fans. hahahahahahaha eat it.

[@kathleenwalsh1676]

NHL is a joke!

[@mikerai4249]

Ahahahahah cry Boston cry agahahahahahahaha

[@anmiles18]

Flordia trying to act like a hockey establishment. Bunch of scoreboard fans...

[@TheThejiaka]

@@anmiles18 boston fan trying to act like being an original 6 team means more than what it is. nothing it means nothing. your getting azz kicked by a team that "trying to act like a hockey establishment". loser