Did Groomer Cut Dog's Nails Too Short? | Part 2

Ekaterina claims her dog got an infection from a salon, but she didn’t see the infected nail until two weeks after the appointment!
The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.
Subscribe to Judge Judy on KZbin: / @judgejudy
#JudgeJudy

[@ramonabuzard4129]

Watching judge Judy has made me realize that most people just really aren’t very smart.

[@eisbeinGermany]

well just listen on her voice , lol

[@minniespuppy]

@@eisbeinGermanywhat does that have to do with anything…

[@Bonobanos]

@@eisbeinGermanyher accent is just proof that she speaks two languages

[@Anabel_Love22]

​@@eisbeinGermanyEnglish isn't her first language and isn't the only language to exist. Did you know that? Or are you missing a few brain cells yourself.

[@marctitus5874]

It's situational. People usually end up here from an emotionally charged event and they are unable to see their faults.

[@scottmcwave9479]

Doggy could have snagged a nail on the carpet at home while having a bit of the zoomies!

[@user-rf5vp4uc2e]

I am literally getting my dog looked at for that exact reason….he has degenerative spinal and he takes medication when it kicks in so does he poor lil guy!

[@MyBizOnlu]

Or on something in the house or outside.

[@sophiemcconnell]

Even the dog is like “mom, it’s over let’s go home now please” 😂😂😂😂 “you’re not going to win here mom” 😂😂😂

[@frigid4real]

There was too large of a gap in time. She's going to lose.

[@exeuropean]

wel he was focusing on her assets

[@JJPrizeDistributionComittee]

Now THIS is a quality first comment! Congratulations! Your prize is a manicure, guaranteed to not result in any amputations for at least two weeks!

[@DianaPrinceIsFreakingAwesome]

​@@JJPrizeDistributionComittee😂

[@baseballheaven6755]

Wow you are so observant! Nothing gets passed you

[@groowanderer]

What did you do, rush in to comment halfway through this part 2? Odd...

[@psoteriou3884]

The dog is blinking in Morse code , "Someone please rescue me from this crazy woman."😅

[@YoshiBugatti]

@@psoteriou3884 😂😂😂😂

[@DeafGuyChronicles.]

Lmfaoooo!

[@mariesmith1616]

Best comment 😂😂😂

[@Dinipoirier]

😂

[@jeffreyclinard2002]

Plaintiff couldn't grasp that just showing dog injuries wasn't enough. She has to tie it to the defendant.

[@ohwowoh7281]

The dog does not seem to care.

[@caseyking0917]

He’s a cute little guy. 🐕

[@CbrF4i600cc]

Because the dog didn't have to pay 😂

[@nevininni2709]

Yes she just wanted to blame someone so she can get all her vet bills paid

[@marybethjordan8520]

😂

[@jeromebass7878]

​@@caseyking0917resembles u

[@jennifer_mertens]

If the dogs nail was nipped at the groomer, the Plaintiff should have noticed it right away(limping, biting, favoring). Infections in dogs usually happen within days, not weeks. A dog that small would succumb to infection rather quickly. The Plaintiff can't prove the Defendants caused the injury. The INITIAL vet report would have probably helped that. Or maybe it did the opposite and that's why she refused to submit it.

[@MangoTroubles-007]

I don't own dogs so idk

[@brackenrobertson799]

The nail wasnt snapped, it was chipped close to the nail bed. Impossible to notice sometimes which is what the plaintiff tried to explain, it became noticeable and an issue once the nail grew. The timeline can absolutely be correct and it absolutely could have been due to the groomers.

[@mrich9654]

It would have bled. I don’t think the groomers are responsible.

[@lucindamakin1262]

@@brackenrobertson799 that's just it though. It COULD have been the groomers. Burden of proof on the plaintiff is that it was beyond doubt that it was a result of the groom. JJ can't make a ruling based on possibility.

[@taltamir]

@@brackenrobertson799 we all understood what the plaintiff tried to explain. So did JJ. As JJ said, the plaintiff is GUESSING that this is the groomer's fault but she has absolutely no shred of evidence to link it to them. Yes, it COULD have happened the way the plaintiff said. or it could have happen a different way. we do not know.

[@Pekkle520]

It’s like talking to a wall… I feel for you JJ

[@MedOKC]

Talk about "beating a dead horse to death," this case certainly meets THAT criteria; plaintiff is just plain DENSE.

[@stefmms6280]

I don't think she is dense. I think she just was trying anyway even though her evidence doesn't support her case.

[@talita.1389]

My dog broke her nail running around the house, it bled like crazy, and there was blood everywhere, if they had injured the dog she would have noticed the same day.

[@brackenrobertson799]

lol no, the nail didn’t bleed because the nail didn’t break off. It wasn’t snapped, it was cracked close to the nail bed. Until that nail grew, and the crack was at the bottom of the nail and became a bigger crack… there absolutely could have been 0 sign for two weeks. You’re not a dog groomer, if you don’t know about something… don’t just ramble off what you think in your uneducated head.

[@talita.1389]

@@brackenrobertson799 did I hurt your feelings with my uneducated comment :(

[@coltenjm10]

The dogs like get me the hell out of here

[@mikedrown2721]

The dog is THINKING "Get me the hell out of here" not LIKE

[@ImOnAJourney]

@@mikedrown2721 Ahhhh!

[@yoonbaksa11]

She doesn't want to listen LOL

[@dfa3366]

It doesn’t take much for a dog’s foot to get injured. If the dogs foot was injured from the groomer you could tell right away how the dog walks.

[@brackenrobertson799]

Not necessarily. She explained the dogs nail wasn’t snapped off, that it was chipped closer to the nail bed… meaning it wouldn’t have been visible or even cause problems until the nail grew in.

[@dfa3366]

@@brackenrobertson799it doesn’t matter. A animal will walk funny if he had even a foxtail weed btw its paws. I’ve had dogs all my life so I would know right away if something is not right.

[@SherriLyle80s]

I believe it's because she just carries the dog all the time. She would have noticed if she put the dog down and let it walk on its own. I hate when people infantize a small dog like it don't have four legs. It's not a purse. Let the dog be a dog. Smh

[@BrianMurfitt]

She didn't lose because it was too big a gap in time, but there was no proof from the vet that the amputation was due to an infection by the groomer. In negligence you must show causation to try and win your case/claim.

[@AntoniusReginaldus]

Yes, but would anything the veterinarian wrote in his report stand up as reality? The follow-up notes from subsequent visits were unsatisfactory for Judge Judy, but she is acting like she wants to see the same kind of verbiage used on the first visit to the clinic. Besides, how fast does Judge Judy expect an infection to manifest itself? The groomer made calls to the vet to make inquiries, which is not admission of causation but Judge Judy thinks that's worthless just because it wasn't almost immediately after the grooming occurred. I'm not in a very receptive mood lately.

[@BrianMurfitt]

@@AntoniusReginaldus Most people aren't in a receptive mood these days, it's the frustration of our times and the sense of entitlement many people have. Oh well it's a cross we all have to bear. I'm going to vote later, but I'm not in a very receptive mood for it! 😬🤪

[@TheAdelaide9]

The dog is so quiet and lovely ❤

[@litigioussociety4249]

It's possible the dog's nails were cut a little short, and the dog then injured it further, which resulted in the infection. However, the judge ruled exactly right, because there was no evidence to connect the clipping to the infection.

[@McKelT]

The dogs face with the big ears and is like 😐… 🤣

[@TheNobleB]

Shocking how many people live completely clueless and can't understand basic common sense. I wanna know how do these people make it day to day in this world?! That's what I want to know. The plantiff did not prove her case. You got to have *EVIDENCE*!🙄

[@johnsmi213]

"Someone keyed my car. And two weeks earlier, I take defendant's parking space." "But you have to prove the defendant was the one who keyed it." "It's very small. So I didn't notice for two weeks." "That doesn't mean the defendant did it." "I have pictures. It looks real bad in sunlight. And repair costs." "There's no proof it was the defendant. Someone else could have done it." "Doors are expensive. This was a shiny door."

[@jesusisc0mings00n3]

Lol. I read it with her russian accent.

[@themermaidstale5008]

JJ has had lots of dogs and at least one of them must have had a nail clipped too short, so she would know how a dog would behave with a sore toe after coming home from the groomer’s place.

[@Pepper-rn4hh]

I've been grooming dogs since 1992 (professionally), and before then. I started my own businesses that is still going today. It is so bizarre when owners of dogs call up and ask if something new or strange happened to their dog while being groomed like 3 weeks ago. There are a lot of people out there that feel someone must be at fault for their dogs itch, scrach, injury, or infection. Um, duh, dogs are active silly creatures who run, play, jump, dig, get into trouble, and expose themselves to all kind of unsavory things. Just because your dog has a cut, flea, twusted ankle, foot or whatever does not mean someone is at fault. Life happens. Especially with kids and pets. And i really dont understand why they (owners of the businesses) left the actual person that groomed the dog at home, what a dumb move.

[@brackenrobertson799]

As a dog groomer, you should also be aware that what she explained could absolutely be the case. The nail wasn’t snapped off it was cracked close to the nail bed. It absolutely may not have caused issues or infection until the crack grew to the bottom of the nail. It’s funny you missed that part out of your “expertise”.

[@Pepper-rn4hh]

@@brackenrobertson799 Trimming a dog nail does not cause it to crack down to the nail bed unless there is an underlying issue with an unhealthy nail. I would argue, that 45 years of experience, makes me an expert. Please tell me, what is your extensive experience? What? Best friends with the woman who launched the lawsuit? You seem just as quick as she was.

[@Picklepop670]

@@Pepper-rn4hhShe sued the groomers because the bacteria on her kitchen floor doesn’t have insurance.

[@skylynnBUHhh8920]

"He doesn't go outside, only in the backyard" 😂

[@moviewolverine89]

Wheel was spinning but the hamster was dead.

[@persuasiv84persona]

i'm stealing this one

[@carrenpalmer3453]

@@persuasiv84persona lol, right, hilarious comment

[@UppityOne]

I have NEVER heard this before!😂

[@shawnaleagarvin2090]

Judge Judy really makes people think about how ridiculous they are…. Coming to court without thinking thru the entire scenario. Both the groomers and the client were sorta ridiculously unprepared.

[@tate6809]

Dog looks high AF, hella cute tho!

[@ImOnAJourney]

Definitely a live wire!

[@matthewbarabas3052]

the dog looks inbred.

[@crpsaiyan]

I don't think it's possible for a dog to get injuries from a pet groomer two weeks later. The dog must've stepped out somewhere and something must've gotten caught in the dog's nail. What I didn't like was that the defendant was laughing when the judge asked her why the groomer wasn't present. I'm thinking, "show some respect when you're in court."

[@iykeharrison9161]

Sometimes, people laugh or force a smile as a defence mechanism when they feel embarrassed

[@LeviAaronx]

Noticed that too

[@brackenrobertson799]

@@NicholasBlake84incorrect. The nail wasn’t snapped off, it was chipped. If the chip occurs closer to the nail bed rather than the bottom of the nail then it’s absolutely possible there were no issues until the nail grew in.

[@brackenrobertson799]

@@ImOnAJourneyagain, this is incorrect. A chip in a dogs nail isn’t necessarily at the bottom of the nail, the nail can be longer but there can be a crack or a chip closer to the nail bed that doesn’t cause discomfort or infection until it grows out.

[@brackenrobertson799]

It absolutely is possible. If the chip was close to the nail bed, rather than the edge of the cut nail, as the plaintiff tried to explain… there may not have been discomfort or visible injury until the nail grew and it became infected.

[@MarvinForte]

This was aggravating watching the plaintiff keep saying the same things over and over. Either she couldn't understand what JJ was telling her, or she was just ignoring her. Either way, she couldn't prove the groomers were responsible.

[@mariesmith1616]

Absolutely ignoring anything but her own thoughts.

[@GardenOfGethsemanie]

If there is something wrong with his foot she would know IMMEDIATELY! Any limping, yelping, licking, change in demeanor as if they don't want to walk on it and it doesn't take 2 weeks.

[@newsflash7609]

her argument is that it got cut during grooming and then became infected. Even small cuts that don't present immediate problems can get infected. It's possible, but she couldn't prove it.

[@brackenrobertson799]

This isn’t true. She literally stated it wasn’t snapped off, that it wasn’t that the nail was cut too short… that it was a crack/chip close to the nail bed. That doesn’t mean it was a crack from the bottom of the nail to the nail bed. Until the nail grew, there may not have been ANY signs of the cracked nail until it grew out. Understand now?

[@deborahjeanne2141]

@@brackenrobertson799I agree with you, except if it grew out, the new growth would not have been cracked and it would have been a nonissue.

[@geffeternal741]

Dog's like, wake me when it's over. We're going to loose anyway. 😑😆🤣

[@AH-te5gs]

Defendants got lucky here

[@brocktoon8]

I believe it probably was a case of the groomer cutting into the nail too far up and it probably bled and she stopped cutting and put a blood stopper powder and then cut it at the right place. It would have taken a week or so to become that infected. And you would be able to tell if the cut was a jagged rip (not from the groomer) or a surgical cut, that would be clear as day. But unfortunately she couldn't prove it.

[@mariesmith1616]

JJ ruling great as always. She was extremely patient with this stubborn plaintiff.

[@feverspell]

The dog may only go outside in the backyard rather than walk down the street, but that doesn't mean there aren't things in your backyard that could snag on a dog's nail and possibly break it, causing an infection. I accidentally cut my dog's nail too short once, and I knew immediately something was wrong. It didn't take me two weeks to figure it out. If the groomers did something to injure the dog, the dog would have presented with pain or discomfort right away, particularly if it was on his/her paw. Now, it's entirely possible the infection was caused by something the groomer did, but without a vet report attesting to that, the plaintiff has no suit.

[@brackenrobertson799]

You cutting your dogs nail too close to the quick is different to a chip in the dogs nail. Did you not listen to what the plaintiff said? The chip became bigger as the nail grew and the ifnevtion had to take hold. Two weeks can absolutely be a correct timeline here.

[@chisheen]

I think Judge Judy was extremely patient with the plaintiff here. She was extremely slow-witted, or maybe English wasn't her primary language so she didn't fully understand what the judge was saying. Unfortunately, she's probably still trying to figure out why photos taken over two weeks later aren't relevant.

[@Kat-kv8pq]

Good call judge Judy ! That could have happened at home ! That lady was ridiculous

[@themirrorsofmymind]

The plaintiff's accent and first name are straight out of 1970s James Bond-style spy thriller movies. I love it!

[@jernigan007]

SHE SOUNDS LIKE A BOND VILLAIN

[@frodo322]

She doesn’t look like one though.

[@anasfishcollection]

And that’s why they didn’t bring the groomer who did the groom they knew she had no proof

[@johnnyboyvan]

Ding dong! Me foolish.

[@erickanew]

A friend of mine got her dog groomed and they cut him around privates. She knew immediately, the next day after picking the dog up. The groomers paid vet bills. If the groomers here did it she probably would've noticed dog walking funny within a couple of days

[@ImOnAJourney]

OUCH!! That poor dog!!

[@brackenrobertson799]

A cut near a dogs genitals is completely different. Why even bring that story up here 😂 the plaintiff explained it was a chip close to the nail bed, not that the nail had snapped off. Do you know how a dogs nails are shaped? If there was a crack close to the nail bed rather than the bottom of the nail… there absolutely could have been a two week delay until it was obvious. Why? Because the nail had to grow out for it to become infected and open.

[@chrisarseneault5617]

Hey Natasha, why Did you wait 2 weeks to take the dog to the vet? And then blame the groomer?

[@ChristsSheep]

The dog looks tired lol so cute!

[@jedimasters1462]

Guess the defendants didn't need the employee there anyway. They just needed to let the plaintiff talk he4 waybout of the win.

[@brt5273]

My indoor cat lost one of her cuspid teeth and two claws permanently over the years. No visible infection or any other obvious cause. I never did figure out why. You have to accept this sort of thing just randomly happens sometimes. If you don't have direct proof it could have been anything.

[@markleaning107]

How funny is the dogs face 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@abigailhodges1534]

Car was moving but doesn’t seem like there was anybody behind the wheel

[@carolr7823]

The dog likely snagged his nail on something totally unconnected to him being groomed.

[@Hitman47uco]

The plaintiff made my head hurt with how she spoke.

[@carolinehoward180]

How many times does this woman need it explained? Jeez 🙄🙄🙄

[@Callidus7SSM]

The whole bottom of my dog’s nail cracked off from getting scraped on a rock. It can happen anywhere. Plaintiff doesn’t get it. My dog is completely fine, btw. She just had a bit of discomfort the first couple days and we just have to keep an eye on it while the nail regrows over the quick

[@mariah1466]

she seems to be the type that really go all out for their dogs (bc that’s their baby) so if she holds her dog the way she was doing here, there’s no way she couldn’t have noticed something sooner if the groomer caused it. just even a slight grave or touch would make the dog pull its foot back and that would concern me enough to look if it was my dog

[@MichaelVillavicencio-cw8ix]

Dog is like, "you don't have any idea what happened to me do you?" Anytime the plantiff talks

[@barnzybarnzy3342]

Defendants got to meet JJ, have a day off because the plaintiff was delusional. 😂😂

[@KayTee979]

The vet report stated the dog's nail was avulsed, this is equivalent to a person ripping off their entire nail so that all of the nail bed underneath is exposed. This did not occur at the groomer two weeks prior to the owner noticing. If a dog avulsed their nail at the groomer, the owner would have noticed immediately. It would have been intensely painful, the dog would have likely been limping and licking at it. This injury occurred shortly before the owner noticed something was wrong. With the quick exposed since the nail was completely avulsed, infection can occur, it is unfortunate the infection go so bad, but it was nothing that the groomers did.

[@usausa3234]

Poor groomers for being drug to court like that. Ridiculous. Pay the vet bill lady and stop wasting everyone’s time.

[@bloomingale7868]

It takes a while for an infection to fester, no?

[@trinity72gp]

What a beautiful dog 😍

[@frankvqz3799]

The broken nail was broken lol

[@deborahsimmons2414]

The medical notes say specifically, that it was a chronic infected nail. Chronic means it was ongoing for more than one month, its means over a log period of time. Clearly the dog had a non healing wound on one of its toes. The fact that the note dated the 29th was missing is very telling. Plaintiff is trying to get someone else to pay.

[@Julie-sl8ul]

Plaintiff is lacking direct evidence but it's shady that the groomer isn't there...

[@mamathemeat]

It’s not really shady if they thought the case was a joke to begin with.. and she has nothing to report cuz nothing happened

[@tugboat2030]

That plaintiff didn't miss a beat pleading her case, did she?

[@radolfkalis4041]

My dog tore a nail running around the back yard. I did not know anything until some time later, she showed no discomfort untill I saw her skip a stride. The nail was dry and ready to separate. Animals don't easily show pain. ANYTHING could have happened in 2 weeks.

[@Wayniesgirl]

Watching the defendant in black start really fidgeting after the plaintiff said the crack was near the nailbed ( almost for sure due to clipping )

[@Lulue_90]

At First i thought it said "cut dogs TAIL off" 😂

[@iykeharrison9161]

It did say that. I think they corrected it

[@ImOnAJourney]

😂😂

[@mojisoladeji]

😂

[@lisali8308]

Hey lady,you want to tell me,if it were to be your child,won’t you check your child’s nails 💅 to make sure it was properly done? Why waited that long? They are not responsible for your dog infection lady.You have no proof and it’s not relevant,your case is dismissed.

[@MelissaBlue]

Remember folks, correlation does not equal causation!

[@monanajafipour483]

Just the cute face of the dog

[@ded66]

The defendants was smart not to bring their groomer. As owners, they realized it was safer to let the plaintiff prove her case than to let their groomer faced Judge Judy. And sure enough, the plaintiff did not realize she had to prove direct cause (broken nail) & effect (infection) . . . as well as contributory negligence (2 weeks before veterinarian care)

[@yeseniavilla5784]

She just went getting it lol

[@mamathemeat]

As a pet grooming business owner I see dogs all the time who come in with cracks in their nails and sometimes broken nails. Also some dogs even chew on their nails. I don’t think the groomer is responsible.

[@hayleymariemills]

She needed documentation from the doctor saying the injury and infection were a result of trimming the dog's nails 2 weeks earlier. She isn't understanding that!

[@sjc3480]

Natasha isn't getting it.

[@esperanzamartinez617]

If the nail was broken it would have been bleeding especially by the nail bed. I see this all the time at work 😒. So many dogs come in to our hospital for broken nails.

[@vernonscloset]

That’s probably why they didn’t feel the need to bring the groomer. They knew it was B.S. When u get your car washed, you check your car inside and out afterwards. Parked your car in public? When you get back, check your car. Groomed your dog? Check your dog afterwards. Not 2 weeks later!

[@michaelgillis9420]

Plaintiff is giving me scam-vibes. She brought the dog in for sympathy too.

[@Fickets]

I think she’s just dumb.

[@newsflash7609]

I'm pretty sure it's not a scam. If it is, it's a dumb one. How did she profit from this? Rather, something unfortunate happened to the dog. She was unable to prove, with evidence, that it was caused by the groomers. It might have been due to them, but she couldn't prove it.

@@newsflash7609agree with this comment 100%. Legit injury. She presumes it’s from the groomer (and it very well may be), but can’t prove it and that’s simply not good enough in court

[@triffus]

Lord. Do you know nothing about " Production".... She was told to bring the dog. It's all fake. I was on the Ellen Degeneres show, for their " Hidden Audience Talents" portion........ They scouted me, put me up in a hotel, sat me in the audience, and told me what to do. THAT IS PRODUCTION!

[@mitchryan5468]

​@newsflash7609 could be a scam where they just make companies suffer. Like If she wins the company would be liable. She won't personally benefit but idk

[@Jade_902]

Defendant is really reaching on this one.

[@BiterAvid]

Yeah, she thought it would work. Nope.

[@michaelgillis9420]

I think you mean the plaintiff.

[@howareyoudoing90]

Plantiff

[@brackenrobertson799]

No she isn’t. They cracked the nail close to the nail bed, as she explained, the infection doesn’t show up straight away and it would take the nail growing out for the infection to really take hold. The nail wasn’t snapped off, it was a crack in the nail, so as the nail grows… and the crack becomes bigger… infection becomes more likely. It’s really simple.

[@deborahjeanne2141]

There’s no way she can prove the groomer was at fault because too much time had passed. She obviously didn’t understand she had to prove - with expert testimony - it was the groomer’s fault. Lucky for the grooming salon since they didn’t bring the groomer that took care of the dog. That was really stupid on their part not to bring her. Actually, this entire case was stupid.

[@casual35]

Hmm infections have to be pretty serious to need amputation. Typically dogs lick the area and she would have known sooner.

[@brackenrobertson799]

She would have known sooner? Do you know how a crack in a nail can work with dogs? It became infected after two weeks, it was a crack in the nail close to the nail bed which then needed to grow out… meaning the crack got bigger and the likelihood of infection heightened. Infections also don’t show immediately.

[@casual35]

@@brackenrobertson799 That's irrelevant. In the law, you have to prove it. She couldn't prove that the groomer did it. Plus s crack in the nail is broad. Could be big, could be small. Dog may not be very active so the crack doesn't get worse etc. I can go on. In court she had to make the connection and she couldn't. Dismissed.

[@glenngatlin8475]

Just don't go back to that groomer.

[@fleece192]

Cute pup.

[@user-bt6wb6jy6p]

Im a groomer and people try to pull this stuff all the time, claiming we did something to the dog weeks later lol

[@Linda7647]

The dog only goes in the back yard. Yeah, well, my Dachshund was running through our back yard, snagged a nail from his front paw onto something, and literally ripped the entire nail right out of its socket. So yeah. Something like that can happen anywhere, anytime. If it was something the dog groomer caused, the plaintiff, more than likely, would have noticed it much sooner.

[@DeafGuyChronicles.]

You can tell that the plaintiff's English is bad and she has trouble understanding. Smh.

[@TK-ij2xi]

She is lost in translation here....."What proof do you have they caused the crack?"

[@Maeve-bgr]

"He is an inside dog". Poor dog...

[@uts4448]

If the plaintiff doesn't get it after Judge Judy made it clear MULTIPLE times, she will never get it. The words entered one ear and went out the other.

[@blakemrolfsensanchez547]

I think the groomers knew they screwed up by not getting the other groomer with them.

[@avrilestwickdurant4946]

In the Caribbean there is a saying, " Spinning top in mud" LOL Its not wat u think or know, its wat u can prove in court!!!

[@MaleOrderBride]

Omg how annoying lol

[@sshms414]

Poor groomers look terrified

[@trekgirl65]

Plaintiff does not get it like the defendants, evidence.

[@jadeekinz]

Lunch crew

[@almightyserf]

Great timing, my boss bought us pizza too

[@sunnystormy4973]

-reupload-

[@daronray7921]

I had Kfc chicken with biscuits and a water

[@ImOnAJourney]

A granola bar and my second quart of water!

[@specialsasha6506]

2 weeks anything cud have happen to the dog in her house

[@lisaapp839]

There is justice.

[@brackenrobertson799]

This is what annoys me about judge Judy. When she doesn’t understand, she assumes. She clearly said the reason she couldn’t see it was because it wasn’t a snapped nail, it was a crack further up the nail so it wasn’t visible until the nail grew. She didn’t even ask the defendants. Annoying

[@rahemejones9769]

The Plaintiff mind stay on one track, no matter what Judge Judy say she going to finish her story 😂😂😂

[@timmahoney7079]

It seems like it was maybe better that the actual groomer didn't show up. I few questions to her could have made the case take a different turn.

[@neilmcdonnell2964]

Is there any part of the plaintiff that is natural?

[@tammytroutman734]

I saw just a bit of the report from the vet & I believe it specifically mentioned the groomer, I don’t understand why JJ wouldn’t at least look at the photos & read the report from the day the dog was brought in?? And y’all being ugly about the plaintiffs speech says a whole lot about you