Did Muhammad Ibn Abul Wahab Rebel Against Ottomon Empire?

The latter part of this nation will not be rectified except by seeking sound Islamic knowledge.
The label Salafee-Jihaadee has been used to categorize Islamic groups that espouse violence against the West and Muslim regimes. The typology of Salafee-Jihaadee is met with vehement disapproval and criticism from adherents to Salafism. For this reason, the portrayal of Salafees as violent extremists requires scrutiny.
This study aims to make a unique contribution to knowledge of Salafism by surveying an extensive literature review, supplemented by interviews of known Salafee clerics based upon the premise that Salafism is an antidote to Islamic extremism rather than a cause of violent jihaad and terror.
In chapter one Salafism is defined and its key features as a movement are characterized and evaluated. Chapter two analyzes Salafees’ view and role in denouncing violence and extremism. Chapter three introduces alternative assessments of Salafism as a movement and evaluates the arguments put forth by its critics. Chapter four investigates Salafist perceptions of pluralism particularly in Western non-Muslim societies. Chapter five details the role of Salafees and their counter arguments to extremism. The final chapter details the conclusions of the research, which indicate that Salafism is not a precursor to violence, but rather the efforts of Salafee scholars offer effective counter-narratives to the jihaadee-takfeeree paradigm.
Links to PhD book
1. Amazon:
Ebook:
www.amazon.com...
Paperback:
www.amazon.com...
2. Smashwords Store:
www.smashwords...
3. Apple:
itunes.apple.c...
4. Barnes & Noble:
www.barnesandno...
5. Kobo Store:
store.kobobooks...

[@aar8808]

The sacking of Karbala took place after his death.

[@j2shoes288]

dates?

[@abduljaleel4467]

No, but he backstabbed the last Islamic Empire that unified the ummah by inciting rebellion accross the realm. Which is itself a crime punishable by unalivement by the way.

[@muhammedtrawally1798]

The fact that people think the Arabs are the only one to blame for the downfall of the ottomans is mind blogging. The Turks themselves rebelled against their leaders, removing one and replacing it with a puppet, introducing constitutions, finally fighting for Turkish independence. The Armenians fighting for freedom, the whole middle east in turmoil, the western power was at its peak, the ottomans were at their weakest. People fail to understand all this, instead their hatred for the Saudis makes them think illogically. We Muslims should stop leaving in the past and focus on the presence, thinking that blaming Arabs will make things better is such an ignorance. For everything that has beginning, will eventually come to an end. The ottomans did their parts and they left just as the ummayds and abasids, it's now our part.

[@Kezothelayman]

An Islamic empire that goes against the complete reason Islam was created in the first place? Grave worshipping is shirk and not allowed lol. And plus The Ottomans were encouraging bidah and innovations throughout their empire btw. Which shows why they were rebelled against. And also, they also rose graves hence why there were shrines instead of leveling them like the hadith states. There are so many contradictions of the Ottomans.

[@zahidbhat2231]

It was ottoman governer hussain bin ali who backstabbed them not saudis