Did the Aryan Invasion Actually Happen? Ancient Civilizations DOCUMENTARY

Рет қаралды 184,212

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 3 600

@KingsandGenerals 12 күн бұрын

🎥 Watch more than 200+ other exclusive videos on youtube: kzbin.info/door/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. Support us on Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!

@Atheist-hy6xq 12 күн бұрын

SCRIPT AND LANGUAGE FOUND IN INDIA Archaeological Evidence and Strong Proof (Unlike unsupported theories such as the Aryan invasion or the Vedic period that have zero evidence-India’s real history is supported by archaeology.) • The INDUS SCRIPT, dating back to around 2600-1900 BCE, is approximately 4600-3900 years old and represents a sophisticated system of writing from the Indus Valley Civilization. • Later, the DHAMMA LIPI, used between 500 BCE and 300 CE, emerged as a significant script. - This script, over 2500 years old, is found on Ashoka’s pillars, inscriptions, and other structures. - There are similarities between the letters of the Indus Valley Script and Ashokan Dhamma Lipi. The letters of Indus valley script over the time involved and turned into dhamma lipi • Over time, between 1 CE and 6 CE, the Ashokan script evolved and contributed to the development of Sanskrit. • Gautama Buddha, widely recognized today, was the last famous Buddha, but many Buddhas existed before him. • There is substantial evidence linking Buddhism to the Indus Valley Civilization, indicating that early Buddhism is over 4000 years old. Evidence of Buddhism in the Indus Valley Civilization • In Mohenjo-daro, a Buddhist stupa was discovered. - While some claim it dates to the 1st century CE, evidence suggests it is from the Indus Valley period, as its brick size matches that of other Indus Valley structures like houses. • A Buddha pendant was discovered in Mohenjo-daro, indicating early Buddhist influence. • The spoked-wheel symbol (☸️), was also found in the Indus Valley. • Gautama Buddha statues from 1-10 CE share stylistic similarities with the so-called "Priest-King" statue of the Indus Valley, especially in clothing style. • A meditation statue was found in the Indus Valley, though its head is broken. • Indus Valley Early Buddhism: Over 4000 years old then turned into • Modern Buddhism: Began with Gautama Buddha. • Gautama Buddha: Born 2500 years ago. • Ashoka the Great: Born 2300 years ago, he spread Buddhism to many countries. Ashoka’s Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Kalsi) • Ashoka said: I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece. Recent Discoveries Supporting Ashoka’s Statement • In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old **Buddha statue** in Berenike, Egypt. • Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries, indicating the spread of Buddhism.

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

don't use false British translations, root word is ling/lingam means symbol, shivalingam means symbol of Shiva. there is a popular Sanskrit word to describe gender - "stree linga" means symbol of stree (women) it doesn't mean women's penis. just like this, there is a Sanskrit word "purling," in that pur stands for purusha (man) and ling stands for (symbol), purling means symbol of man. both words are translated as feminine and masculine. correct your dictionary.

@HarishJuke 12 күн бұрын

Make video about orgins of dravidans

@mscreationworks5787 11 күн бұрын

@@Atheist-hy6xqThe last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world. Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well. In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya '

@mscreationworks5787 11 күн бұрын

@@Atheist-hy6xqA report from Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, in Florida , United States , on the carbon dating from the Alagankulam excavation site . The carbon Dating found it to be from 345 BC. "Since many potteries found at the site have Tamil inscriptions, It proven that the age of Tamil Brahmi script is more than 345 BC and much older than Dhamma Lipi ( Prakrit in the Brahmi Script ) of Ashoka Edicts

@Juve_Fan2601 12 күн бұрын

I can already hear the, “as an Indian” comments.

@DJ-iu5bb 12 күн бұрын

As a German 😏

@DasFuuk 12 күн бұрын

Saar, don't insult India saar there were no ayrans invasions saar why you insult India saar

@AltroSinefred 12 күн бұрын

@@DasFuuk 🤣🤣🤣

@dhimankalita1690 12 күн бұрын

I can already see the "wE europeans were master race fadar of all " comments

@killallhokkiensf3701 12 күн бұрын

"smell"

@antidweller6373 12 күн бұрын

Old Europeans themselves were completely conquered by the Indo Europeans from the steppes. I think Hindu nationalist don't like the word "European" in INDO European. If it was called Indo Asian I think they had less problems with that theory.

@randomdosing7535 12 күн бұрын

So, from the evolutionary point of view, indo Europeans were indeed better equipped and quashed others and propagated their own progeny manifolds more than others 🤔. .. Today, huge swathes of world population and languages are of indo Europeans.. A master race??

@jashemfarhan7511 12 күн бұрын

Indians ( mostly those who follow Hindutva ideology) dont like the theory because They use the term " invader " or "foreigners" mainly to denigrate Indian Muslims. And the Aryan invasion or migration theory also puts them in the same filter.

@runajain5773 12 күн бұрын

It is not Hindu nationalist stuff. It is south Tamil dravadian nonsense start stuff that the whole south Indian are original Indian and north Indian are outsiders and Hinduism is Aryan religion and people say Aryan invasion theory is British divide and rule tactic to divide the north and south that reason why in online bjp user against if you say Aryan migraintion theory it okay they do not have problem Indo European you itself conspiracy pretend to be Indian political expert

@marcbartuschka6372 12 күн бұрын

I somehow doubt that "completely conquered". It may very well be that it was there a similar process. That does mean it was peacefull, but in almost all cases we have a mixture of alliances, coexistence, but also conquest and sometimes even enslavment and mass-murder.

@curiouskid1547 12 күн бұрын

I think you should read actual research. There is zero evidence of migration into India by Aryans.

@Someone-d6r 12 күн бұрын

Both indian right winger indigenous homogeneity claimers and leftist and Dravidian+mulnivasi nationalists needs to understand and have consensus on some points: >There was some kind of MIGRATION from Eurasia or steppe, it makes more sense than it's counter out migration theory >No tribes/people spawns from land everyone came from somewhere >Mostly none in india is pure but in gradients >Most of our gene pool is close to Indus valley people none one can claim them >Hinduism isn't foreign it is mixture of all indian faiths

@nectorsnow34 12 күн бұрын

Nobody's denying simple fact of migration. People migrated from one place to another. But it is what comes after. That after 400 years of migration. The absurd claims that, somehow after this migration native northern Indians suddenly stopped speaking their own language and started speaking some Indo-European language. And suddenly stopped following their own own culture but started following Vedic culture invented by these immigrants. If that was true, why didn't it happen during Mughal invasion of thousands of years. Or British colonization of 200 years. Why didn't the whole of northern India stopped speaking Hindi and Sanskrit and started speaking and writing in a branch of languages like Turkic and Persian or English. Why didn't the whole of Northern India started following Islam or Christianity.

@SpecialGlobalTalks 11 күн бұрын

@@Someone-d6r Hinduism is only modern times religion code

@SpecialGlobalTalks 11 күн бұрын

@@nectorsnow34 it is cultural intermixing bro

@SpecialGlobalTalks 11 күн бұрын

@@Someone-d6r mainly Indians are mix community genetically ANI And ASI mix Dravidians are mix of ASI means IVC Iranian farmers and hunter and gatherers indo Africans

@Someone-d6r 11 күн бұрын

@SpecialGlobalTalks Hinduism is dynamic religion with no central authority and uniformity in neither geographically nor in case of time, so it can't be said to be modern

@sealofapoorval7437 12 күн бұрын

0:48 Please don't already mess this up 😭 It is Hindi not Hindu. Hindi is a language, Hindu is a religion.

@Stupidpotato48 12 күн бұрын

What a catastrophy!!!

@elephantman2854 12 күн бұрын

Eh, hindi comes from hindustani anyway

@Dheeraj-y4f 12 күн бұрын

Hindu - religion Hindi- language Hindusthan- country

@_UNISTAR_ 12 күн бұрын

Says a lot about the level of research put into these videos, despite the high number of subscribers.

@RajSingh-xn8qd 11 күн бұрын

If that was the case you wouldn't see total language replacement over 1 million square miles. The migration theory is only been added later because no evidence of invasion has been found, but has a fatal problem now explaining why the indus people stopped speaking their own languages and started speaking the alleged coming Aryan languages. We now know the indus people were vastly much larger and advanced than central Asian hordes. So the idea is similar to proposing Cuba taking over America and everybody in America stops speaking English and only speaks complete Cuban.

@ElBandito 12 күн бұрын

My man knows how to get video engagement.

@paulfitzgerald5611 12 күн бұрын

He definitely does

@sirgg3847 12 күн бұрын

naah saaar native indians are lindus saaar we report this vidu saar

@grapeshott 12 күн бұрын

You mean Indian history can't be discussed in a channel without the ulterior motive of gaining views?

@aesop1451 12 күн бұрын

@azouzi8968 12 күн бұрын

@@grapeshott He means, he's baiting the indian nationalists into trying to "convince us" of their nationalist version by not totally refuting it.

@Gen.berseker25 12 күн бұрын

Video idea: The Origins of the Dravidian Peoples

@CHRS-ri5mf 12 күн бұрын

There is concrete Evidence establishing link Dravidian and IVC. IVC is mostly unknown for now

@blugaledoh2669 12 күн бұрын

@@CHRS-ri5mfIVC?

@QuartetGhost 12 күн бұрын

A less controversial idea that'll likely take us the ice age let's do it

@adurpandya2742 12 күн бұрын

They came from Oman during the “Green Arabia” period.

@uniformityofnature1488 12 күн бұрын

@@adurpandya2742they share maternal linage with Ethiopians, East Africans, Senegalese, South Africans, Algerians and Mauritanians.

@AbhiramN_1289 12 күн бұрын

Guys, having ~35% Steppe DNA doesn’t make you less native to India The Austroasiatic speaking Adivasi tribes have roughly the percentage of Southeast Asian DNA. This was because there was a migration from Southeast Asia from around the same time as the Indo European migration. If people are okay with the calling the Santhali or Mundas as native, I am pretty sure the majority of Indians would technically be native as well. Of course we ruse the term “indigenous” to refer to the marginalized groups, but that is regarding a separate thing altogether. What makes the Indo European migration different from the Greeks, Huns, or Turks coming to India is that the Indo Europeans became a defining feature for the Indian genetics and culture and by the time of the Greeks, Huns, and Turks, there was already a distinct people with a distinct identity tied to the land. Once you develop deep cultural ties to the land, you are native.

@SpecialGlobalTalks 12 күн бұрын

Biggest fact in whole world human civilization and population form by there oldest ancestors homo sepian tribes who migrate from African continent all are outsiders in Asia europe and whole world except African continent also this earth not make there one place for particular individual or community for all

@rahul.dadwal 11 күн бұрын

Precisely. But then again, the roots of the so-called Proto Indo-Europeans, in genetic terms, go back to the paleo-siberians or the Ancient North Eurasians, which goes back to Sundaland, South East Asia again. As such, for the R1a-carrying 'Aryans' the Tribals of Eastern India and nothing but a little Distant Cousins. :-)

@vamsikrishna3855 11 күн бұрын

@@rahul.dadwalyou are wrong the most diverse of R1a is in India . So the migration happened outward to Europe. Even Marxist professors stopped teaching Aryan invasion theory and being slowly abandoned . By the way do you know how the date of 1500BC for Vedas come about? Take a guess.

@whocares435-z9v 11 күн бұрын

So does that mean that whites in places like Australia are also native, since they have developed a deep connection to the land over hundreds of years and know no other home?

@rahul.dadwal 11 күн бұрын

@@vamsikrishna3855 NO! The diversity of R1a in India is under the clades L657 and some Z2124, and there is one odd Z283, but that is quite rare(found among a non-Baloch in Balochistan). Bottomline the primary clades are all under Z93>Z93. What other clades have you heard of in South Asia? Is that what you call diversity?

@akshaypadmashali8686 12 күн бұрын

Brave of you to delve into this topic...please ignore any negetive comments... We indians need content like this

@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA 12 күн бұрын

by negative comments you mean people who doesnt belive in this european propoganda right ? well then iam fine

@akshaypadmashali8686 12 күн бұрын

@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA i wrote that comment before I even saw the video. I mean any sort of ideology that discourages people from making or talking abt any interesting topic... Sometimes people are so stuck in their mindset that they don't allow good faith conversation or content abt certain issues

@dimi2805 12 күн бұрын

The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less. Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey. This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again. This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it. The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man. In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move" The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios. Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun. Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.

@akshaypadmashali8686 12 күн бұрын

@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYAexample Christians don't believe in the theory of evolution. But that doesn't mean we should be discouraged into creating content or conversation on the theory of evolution.

@CHRS-ri5mf 12 күн бұрын

Correct 💯@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA

@eafstudios6436 12 күн бұрын

It was likely more of a gradual migration than an "invasion" per se and eventually led to intermarriage and cultural hybrization. This happened with the Sumerians and the Akkadians as well as with the Persians and Elamites, not to mention the Romans and Etruscans. One group didn't simply "push out" the other.

@lambert801 12 күн бұрын

Invasions almost never "push out" any population. The conquerors simply become the rulers of the conquered peoples (much easier and more profitable in the long run than their utter annihilation). This was most certainly the case anywhere the Aryans invaded and conquered.

@amitkumarsingh1709 12 күн бұрын

@@lambert801if they Trade frequently & close proximity mostly likely elite from both Indus valley & bacteria region have familiar ties they marry each other led to cross-pollination of culture and religion rather than invasion

@silentbyte196 12 күн бұрын

@@lambert801 Yeah. An exception to these aryan habits was the stuff that was going on in 1939-1945

@RestingJudge 12 күн бұрын

Etruscans and Romans are a great example as the Etruscans didn't speak an indo-european language yet were surrounded by Celts, Latin, and Greeks who did. Really shows that despite thousands of years there were definitely some holdouts from before the migrations. The Basque of today still speak their ancient language. I think migration just better illustrates the indo-european movement, probably had some conquering chiefs for sure, but no one was invading as what we would think of nowadays.

@dimi2805 12 күн бұрын

@smartworld6137 11 күн бұрын

Correction, Delhi Sultanate never conquered Kerala or Tamil Nadu in full.. (South India was never conquered in full)

@WickederDrake37 11 күн бұрын

the research in this video is really well done. 🤣🤣

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

Don't forget about Malik Kafur invasion in 14th century A.D. He and his men under the orders of Alauddin Khilji (Turkic) massacred thousands and thousands of Tamil Hindus for resisting the loot and plunder of temple riches like gold and silver coins and ornaments, idols from the cities of Kanchi, Madurai, Srirangam, Thanjavur and Chidambaram. Yes, South did not faced much aggression from Muslim Sulthans compared to North. Thanks to South Indian kings who had unity and we should be very thankful to unique geography of peninsula. Covered with rich forests with wild animals and inpregnable mountains like Vindhyas, Satpuras, Western and Eastern Ghats. Rivers and high rainfall along the sea coasts on three sides. While North has less forests in Aravallis and Himalayas. Lots of river plains and some desert regions. If an enemy's army reaches khyber pass in North West Frontier of Pakisthan. It is much easy to move along the Indus - Yamuna- Ganga plains without any natural barriers till Bengal.

@bjarkiengelsson 11 күн бұрын

Is that a Bill Wurz reference? (they never got the Tamil Kingdoms)

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

@@bjarkiengelsson This is the reason why Kumara Kampanna the Tuluva warrior of Vijayanagara kingdom of Karnataka defeated Madurai Sulthan and took charge of Tamilnadu on request of Sundara Pandyan was Pandyan ruler of Madurai. They ruled for centuries, repaired and constructed new temple structures. After the collapse of Tuluva dynasty, Telugu speaking warriors and zamindars who worked since Krishna Deva Raya took power and expanded his territories in Andhra Pradesh. Shifted their base from Andhra and ruled Tamilnadu, parts of Karnataka for many centuries. Madurai Nayaks, Gingee Nayaks, Thanjavur Nayaks and Shimoga Nayaks. Kandyan Sinhalese Kingdom was founded by Madurai Nayaks in 18th century AD. If you visit Palakkad you can see many Tamil Brahmins, their houses and temples. Ever wondered how they came there? We came to Palakkad, Chittur and Alathur on three waves. 1. Malik Kafur Invasion 2. Downfall Of Vijayanagara Empire 3. Anglo French Wars (Battle Of Trichinopoly)

@santhoshsurya72 11 күн бұрын

it was conqured mallikafur came all the way till madurai

@simulify8726 12 күн бұрын

Kind of find it funny how Indians are more focused on this whole thing when later the greeks and huns also entered and mingled with the local populace Yeah it's been made a political movement in India but seriously, what's the point of being proud whether you are native or not for something which happened 5k years ago and you have no control over it

@justaguyfrom 12 күн бұрын

Huns never mingled with the local population scythians and kushans did. The huns got wiped out by the warrior clans of the north after the huns battle with the gupta empire.

@AmachiEligwe 12 күн бұрын

The issue is less the mingling and more its importance to Hindu identity. Greeks arriving there doesn't say anything about their religion.

@Welfu1 12 күн бұрын

If someone has mingled the most with native hindus that would be the Turk muslims from kazakstan, afghanistan, uzbekistan and Pakistan due to the mughal invasion consisting all of these people

@Thechezbailey 12 күн бұрын

@@Welfu1Right? Nobody's talking about the Mughals and they have a profound and lasting influence on Indian culture and politics right now! It's bizarre.

@SonofIndia1999 12 күн бұрын

@@justaguyfromthey mingle bro with Gurjar may be

@SomasAcademy 12 күн бұрын

~0:47 Hindu is a religion, not a language. They presumably meant Hindi, one of the most widely spoken languages in India.

@SohanLalwani 11 күн бұрын

@prasoonjha1816 11 күн бұрын

A typo in the script.

@Mehar-x3d 11 күн бұрын

hindi-urdu = hindu

@satyamindnectar7052 11 күн бұрын

@Mehar-x3d By that Logic Arabic-Persian = Islam

@Mehar-x3d 11 күн бұрын

@ nope; Hindi-Urdu is collectively called Hindustani in Indian subcontinent. Actually, Indians don't speak Hindi but Hindustani in general. Hindu is not a religion; it is sanatana and most importantly Hindu is a foreign word used by al-biruni in 12th century

@MrCHO500 9 күн бұрын

Hindi is a language. A Hindu is a person who follows Hinduism

@crewrangergaming9582 6 күн бұрын

Hindu is a person who lives West of the Indus river. Hindu was never a word in ancient India, it was a name given by Greeks and then Europeans adopted it later.

@BlackPanther-ks6fb 6 күн бұрын

@@crewrangergaming9582 It was actually mentioned by Persians first. They used "Hindush" to people of Indus Valley.

@IndianKat 5 күн бұрын

@@crewrangergaming9582 you are also correct in literal sense. But in contemporary sense, hindu means anyone who follows hinduism. Even bali people would be called hindu

@satyamindnectar7052 3 күн бұрын

@@crewrangergaming9582. hepta hendu/Hapta Hindu is 2500 years old Avestan word which refers to people of Sapta Sindhu which later start to refer people of Indian subcontinent and their culture/religion In modern time it refers people Dharmic culture (Excluding Buddhist,Jains and sikhs)

@supergirlfromheaven8421 Күн бұрын

@@crewrangergaming9582 simple say it's Sanatani drama which is our orginal name 😂🤣 and 9,800 years ago you can find our marks in all over the continent where human's were 😂. Have some basic knowledge 🤦🏻✂️

@DaēnāVanguhi 12 күн бұрын

Blessings to all peoples of India, the most diverse country on earth! P.S. as a Zoroastrian we owe you a massive debt!

@Subhradeep-o-bhava 12 күн бұрын

Brother ❤ our land will always welcome you, and we will make you feel as if you are in your home. Namaste

@DaēnāVanguhi 12 күн бұрын

@ Ushta Te! Blessings and happiness to you brother, i cannot wait to visit!

@agnelomascarenhas8990 12 күн бұрын

Bawa or Irani, I bet Bawa after reading the PS! 🤣

@Subhradeep-o-bhava 12 күн бұрын

@@agnelomascarenhas8990 if one identifies themselves as a zorastrian that is enough for you. We as Indians have a civilizational commitment to the zorastrians, Jews and the tibetans. We Hindus will always honour it, and the commitment is to return their homeland back to them. Until then they are our guests, and we have lived with them and protected them for centuries, even when we were occupied. We'll keep doing it.

@प्रशकुमार-त5प 12 күн бұрын

@@Subhradeep-o-bhavalol this kind of nature is harmful

@jeffersonwright6249 12 күн бұрын

The Anglo-Saxon invasion/migration of post Roman Britain could provide an interesting comparison study

@deveryhenderson8335 12 күн бұрын

maybe if it wasn't a total fabrication. this is almost as cringe as caucasainoids pretending to practice kundalini and yoga. face it, you can't steal a religion or culture as your own. stick to Walmart and McDonalds.

@nerthus4685 11 күн бұрын

Or the waves of Germanic tribes entering Italy and Spain. I imagine the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was like that. Foreigners first being welcomed and then overwhelming the dying civilization. Then wave after wave coming and fighting the last. The modern west is experiencing the same thing.

@Nick-hi9gx 11 күн бұрын

It is a perfect example, but Nationalists refuse to accept it. It is just like the Bantu, after the initial invasions into what is now Nigeria (which were exceedingly violent, they were not migration), and the Han Chinese into Xiliand and south into Yue, Ba and Bai lands, or the Slavs as they moved south into Southern Slavic lands. It was series of invasions, migrations, assimilation some of the time, syncretism others, and cultural diffusion. People view it through a lens of modern nationalities, huge ethnic groups, even nation-states. But that isn't how the world worked unless an area had political and economic unity on a very large scale. Usually, it is small groups moving around, something grouping together, then breaking apart again. Invasion here, migration there. Intermarriage with a conquered people in one place, displacement of the nobility in another, replacement of a population that was wiped out due to famine, plague, natural disaster all coinciding in another place.

@joyeetaghosh2209 9 күн бұрын

The nationalist have given arguments bro so go study both sides and stop potraying nationilist side of argument are always false @@Nick-hi9gx

@Nick-hi9gx 9 күн бұрын

@ Nationalists are always wrong.

@MacrobianNomad 12 күн бұрын

Here come the Hindutva Horde in the comments in 1, 2, 3…

@Dheeraj-y4f 12 күн бұрын

Hehe u r on track boy

@malchir4036 12 күн бұрын

The illest payeets on the sh$itting street.

@binarystar-y9w 12 күн бұрын

Typical Mulla comment

@SpecialGlobalTalks 12 күн бұрын

Golden horde become hindutva horde 😮 next islamic horde then Christianic horde

@senpai3946 12 күн бұрын

Bindu eating too many ghee huh make bindu fat and slow like the Ganesha lindu

@AbhiramN_1289 12 күн бұрын

Guys, even if the Indo Iranian language family is foreign to India, Sanskrit would still be indigenous to India. This is because when talking about where a language originates, it specifically about in which place a language took upon its own identity as a distinct language. It would be absurd to say that Spanish originated in Italy because it came from Latin.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

You are absolutely right

@bencopeland3560 12 күн бұрын

You’re articulating a correct principle however I’m not sure it fully applies here. I think I read it argued by philologist that the Mitani ruling class spoke a language so close to Sanskrit that there was no meaningful distinction to be made between them. Sanskrit itself may have come from some Indo Iranian parent culture to the Vedics of India. Which would mean that, at best, you could say India developed a local dialect.

@AbhiramN_1289 12 күн бұрын

@@bencopeland3560 We don’t know what exactly the Mittani spoke. All we know is it was some Indo Aryan language. Sanskrit is noted for its retroflexes and some other Dravidian influences in grammar.

@curiouskid1547 12 күн бұрын

The thing is it isn't foreign to India. Actual facts are stonewalled by western academia.

@bencopeland3560 12 күн бұрын

@@AbhiramN_1289 I think KZbin will kill any comment that includes a direct link but I want to direct you to an article on SCROLL called Fact check India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded - it was Syria. It reiterates the point I made with better citations. While it doesn’t deny that the language could have continued to develop locally in India (indeed it would be impossible for that not to have happened) it pretty unapologetically points to a location outside of India for the early-Sanskrit parent to later Mitanni and Indian dialectic variants.

@apollosdomain 12 күн бұрын

I’ve not watched the video yet, but the theory that I have been holding for years is that, it was not an outright invasion but a slow migration and the assimilation of the existing local population.

@artcorbeau 12 күн бұрын

that's actually the most commonly accepted thesis. Slow migration and assimilation

@BlueBird-q8k 12 күн бұрын

Well in some places you are right in most of India this was the case but indus river civilization almost certainly got conquered by aryans

@lambert801 12 күн бұрын

There was no assimilation. The Aryans imposed a harsh and strict caste system on their conquered populations wherever they went, thinking themselves "the worthiest people." They were the original N*zis.

@ishanbajpai6940 12 күн бұрын

@@BlueBird-q8k It is in IVC that it's the most wrong

@BlueBird-q8k 12 күн бұрын

@@ishanbajpai6940 okay whatever makes you happy

@VYBCTV 12 күн бұрын

One more thing I like to add. Still there is a stereotypic statement in Indian public that Northerners are fair, tall and well built and Southerners are mostly dark, short and not well built. That's a generalization. Not all North Indians are taller and fair with sharp features. If you compare with state wise in north Punjabis, Delhiites, Kashmiris and Haryanvis are the tallest. In South, Malayalis, Tuluvas, Kodavas and Telugus are tallest. In West and East people are generally short or medium. If you go through community wise, Pashtuns, Jatts, Khatris, Uttar Pradesh Brahmins, Yadavas, Rajputs, South Indian Brahmins, Nairs, CKPs, Bunts, Nasranis, Wodeyars, Kodavas will be the tallest. People who eat more barley, wheat, milk, curd, paneer and meat will have more height, well built body in general compared to rice eaters. Same goes to wheat eating, lactose tolerant and meat eating Northern and Central Chinese (Mandarin speakers) compared with rice eating, lactose intolerant, meat eating Southern Chinese. (Cantonese speakers) Ancestral North Indian is a combination of Sintastha people (From Russia - Kazakhstan Border) mixed with IVC people. (Zagrosian Iranian Hunters mixed with AASI ie, Basal East Eurasians from East Africa.) Ancestral South Indian is a mix of IVC plus AASI and Sintastha people.(Sintasthans have BMAC DNA too. BMAC DNA is a mix of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers & Caucasus Hunters) North Indians have 17% - 40% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 35% - 58% IVC, 5% - 22% BMAC, 2% - 6% Sino-Tibetan & 28% AASI. South Indians have 3% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 48% - 72% IVC, 5% - 15% BMAC, 2% - 8% Sino -Tibetan & 15% - 56% AASI. Eastern Indians have 3% - 23% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 5 - 12% Sino Tibetan, 3 - 13% BMAC, 30% IVC & 33 - 68% AASI. Western Indians have 10% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 4 - 14% BMAC, 3% Sino Tibetan, 45 - 68% IVC & 22 - 53% AASI. North Easterners have 33% - 65% Sino - Tibetan & 33% AASI. Courtesy: South Asian Ancestry/Reddit Northern Chinese descendants are Ancient North East Asians. (Genetically related to Tibetans, Mongols, Koreans & Japanese.) While Southern Chinese are mix of Ancient South East Asians (Genetically related to Austronesians, Kra-Dai, Austro Asiatic peoples) and Ancient North East Asians.

@hariprasath3913 12 күн бұрын

dude have you seen people from Tirunelveli, Kanyakumari, Madurai districts of Tamil nadu?. many of them especially Men will be of 6 feet & have strong physical features. it's because of they eat more non - veg foods & involve in more physicals activities like sports, martial arts etc.

@JohnAdams-vd5dc 12 күн бұрын

@@hariprasath3913 Lol it has nothing to do with diet and sports. You find strong people across India regards of diet and sports across India. One region is NOT superior to another region.

@erenjaeger2859 12 күн бұрын

rarh region brahmin,mahishya and kayastha have more r1a1 and steepe dna since they are descended from north india, since the ancestral east is now in bangladesh we need improved data from all the groups here including namasudra and bagdi and mondol

@aesop1451 12 күн бұрын

It's a generalization. If I wanted to find a blond Italian I would go to Lombardy, not Sicily 9 times out of 10.

@SpecialGlobalTalks 12 күн бұрын

Mainly South Asian population is mix population Indo aryans are mix of central Asian and eurasian steppes and local IVC peoples called ANI ancestry North Indians And Dravidian peoples mix of IVC and Local hunter and gatherers indo African population letter also mix with ANI peoples called ASI ancestry South Indians or Deccan peoples

@Wkumar07 12 күн бұрын

Indian here ✋🏿. Of course there were various migrations into the sub-continent. How could there not have been? Our species is always on the move and always mingling with whoever came before. Those who deny this does not understand humanity.

@boldjawad 12 күн бұрын

As if you being Indian gives you natural knowledge of these things

@Wkumar07 12 күн бұрын

@boldjawad of course not. However, am adding in a kind of antidote to the Hindu nationalism the we now sees so openly on these matters.

@dimi2805 12 күн бұрын

@Zer0Mat8c 12 күн бұрын

@dimi2805 can you share your sources? I'm fascinated by this

@diablodelfuego6633 12 күн бұрын

It's not about the migration. The issue is about calling Hindu culture as foreign to indian subcontinent. These Westerners who favour Western sources have their own agenda. You can see the sheer racism Europeans are showing. They can't accept the fact that we have a better civilization than their barbaric culture.

@diogopinto6039 12 күн бұрын

It’s gratifying to see how much the channel has evolved throughout the years! Keep up the good work :)

@KingsandGenerals 12 күн бұрын

Thanks!

@dontreadmyprofilepictureplease 11 күн бұрын

@@KingsandGenerals The Aryan Invasion Theory is a racist and colonialist myth that has been discredited. The theory claims that Indo-Aryans migrated to India from outside the country. However, there is no compelling evidence to support this theory. there is also a myth spread by Europeans that poras defeated by alexander actually war ended in truce bw them.

@dontreadmyprofilepictureplease 11 күн бұрын

@PrimeAdistron-f3m 11 күн бұрын

14:10 In Sanskrit, Linga means a "mark" or a symbol, which points to an inference. Thus the Shiva Linga is a symbol of Lord Shiva: a mark that reminds of the Omnipotent Lord, which is formless. Hey bro pls correct it 😊🙏🏻 Edit:- let me elaborate a little more Linga in hindi means male organ but in Sanskrit Linga or Lingam means symbol and shiva means nothingness Hence the name Shiva Lingam/Shiva Linga Which means Symbol of Formlessness And the confusion was created by Mughals to defame Hinduism and Britishers also got confused between Hindi and Sanskrit words Hope it clears doubt

@SpongePoP_hatesTriangle_Pants 11 күн бұрын

Shib linga literally indicated as S€X ORGAN . STOP MISREPRESENTING.

@SpongePoP_hatesTriangle_Pants 11 күн бұрын

shiva attempted to rape the daughter of Agniveshya📚SkandaPurana1.2.9.40-58,Gods drank the semen of Shiva and pregnanted,Shiva Purana 2.4.2.9-11.Shiva sex with a prostitute📚Shiva Purana 3.26.1-30

@SpongePoP_hatesTriangle_Pants 11 күн бұрын

Do you know your Dharma ? What is under shib linga ? Shaktis vagin@ ? I am challenging you to prove me wrong

@Dheeraj-y4f 11 күн бұрын

Yeah

@anamelessmonster 10 күн бұрын

Lingta for a reason

@rogermilla2358 5 күн бұрын

I'm a big bad Hindu Nationalist myself, but modern Aryan Migration Theory of gradual exposure in waves with eventual inter-mingling has always struck me as the most plausible. Neither the original colonial AIT nor the new OIT seem likely to me.

@bookofeverything3204 5 күн бұрын

It has to be an invasion… migration followed invasion (like bropga people in laddakh)civilisation cannot disappear in thin air like ivc did leaving behind barhui people in balochistan while majority been driven to the south… indra described as purandra- destroyer of forts… which forts he destroyed??? The very literal meaning of the term varna=color tells you something… the varna system is a testament to the fact that invasion happened and if you travel across india or at least do some ethnographic research you will come to the conclusion…. the genetic map of people from subcontinent have two poles- north indian and south indian ancestors with genetic intermixing intially with later on a freeze due to caste system provides a snapshot in history… as you move south dravidian genes progressively increase… a minority i.e brahmins would not have been able to segregate such a huge population unless they were the dominant invaders aided by kshatriya warriors who subjugated the population they invaded … the color gradient from brahmins down to tribals tells you something and there is a pattern… this seems to be most plausible explanation… as regards the intellect of those hindu nationalists- on one end they seem to be taking the moral high ground as their ancestors have never invaded other land(how could they when entire south asia is yours 😂😂😂 aka akhand bharat) and at the same time supporting isr*el incursions into g*za and wesrb*nk and it l*nd gr*b… they have no place in mainstream scholarship

@escapedeviltrap 5 күн бұрын

Aryans were not a race BTW

@freetamilnaduandsouthfromi2984 3 күн бұрын

Finally, a logical Sanghi

@infinite5795 3 күн бұрын

@@freetamilnaduandsouthfromi2984same as Dravidian migration theory, ricebag madrasi

@krampusx9784 3 күн бұрын

I agree. I hope that your view becomes the dominant one in India. Political agendas should never take precedence above sound archaeological and epigraphical evidence.

@thesenate8477 11 күн бұрын

Before the Aryans entered India, there was another migration that isn't talked about much at all: the arrival of Zagrosian peoples into South Asia. A group from modern day Zagros region in Iran entered south asia around 10,000/9,000 BCE and mixed with native Indian tribals in modern-day Pakistan and Gujarat, India. Their descendants would later build the Indus Valley Civilization and then be called the DRAVIDIANS. The migration of the people from Zagros into India is not nearly as known as the Aryan migrations!

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

Now researchers and general public are talking about Zagrosian Iranian Hunters migrated to India many centuries before Sintastha Culture people (ancestors of Indo Aryans) arrived in BMAC from West Eurasian Steppes Bordering Kazakhstan and South Russia. Later came to Indian subcontinent through North West Frontier by the name Aryans. Indus Valley Civilization is a mix of Zagrosian Iranian Hunters mixed with Ancient Ancestral South Indians. The reason nobody talked about this was due to Hindu hating, Brahmin hating, Sanskrit hating left leaning, pro Christian and pro Islamic politicians, JNU professors, NGOs and liberals who dominated brutally for the past 75 years. Both Congress, DMK and Comminists are biggest enemies of Hindus. They support Muslims only. Other than Ancient Ancestral South Indians (AASI) nobody could claim whole Indian subcontinent as theirs. Baring few forest tribes in South, East and Central there is no pure AASI too. So we are all mixed. It is the percentage which differs from region to region and community to community. India belongs to all who respect our history, languages, cultures and civilizations. " Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu" Jai Hind.😎🇮🇳

@satyamindnectar7052 11 күн бұрын

@@VYBCTV. How you explain steppe ancestry among Indians ?

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

@@satyamindnectar7052Read many of my posts I always refer to authentic sources with solid scientific backing before posting my comments and statements. Yes steppe ancestry in the genetics of South Asians are due to mixing of Sintastha Culture people who came from Southern Russia and Kazhaksthan border. Before coming to the Indian subcontinent they mixed with BMAC people. (BMAC is a combination of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers and Caucasus Hunters) They learned agriculture from BMAC. That's why farming methods in Vedic Period are more identical to BMAC than IVC. Indus Valley Civilization was founded by Zagrosian Iranian Hunters who mixed with AASI. That means other than AASI no one is indigenous in this land. Those who live on glass house should not throw stones. Even AASI people are not pure blood except some isolated forest tribes in Southern and Eastern parts of the country. If Aryans are outsiders, then Zagrosian Iranian Hunters are outsiders too. Calling one group an outsider and another one who came few centuries before that group is pure bias nothing else.

@satyamindnectar7052 11 күн бұрын

@@VYBCTV What your hypothesis on pashupati seal ?

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

@@satyamindnectar7052 Archaeologists have not yet concluded that it was an early form of Lord Shiva. These are assumptions only. Because Shiva appears in Puranas and Ithihasas which were written much later during Mahajanapadha and Sangham periods. In Vedas, Rudra, (later become Shiva) Vishnu and Prajapathi (later become Brahma) were least important gods. Most important gods in Vedas are Indra, Mitra, Varuna and Agni. Other Vedic Gods are Ashwins, Maruts, Dayus, Soma, Surya, (Savitr) Vayu, Pushan, Bhagha, Sachi, (Indrani's other name. Which become Sakthi in Puranic texts) Varuni, Vaac, Ushas and Saraswati. According to Vedas, everything in this universe came from one absolute reality. Either you worship one god or goddess or many gods and goddesses. Doesn't matter. Like every river joins the ocean or like every ray of sun merges from one single source. Wise sages call God many names. " Indram, Mitram, Varunam, Agnim Ahur Divyasa Suparno Garutman Ekam Sat Vipram Bahutha Vadanthi Agnim Yamam Mathariswanam Ahu". RigVeda "Indra, Mitra, Varuna, Agni they say and about divine Garudman too. (Eagle) Wise sages call one true god many names like Agni, Yama and Ashwins too." RigVeda When many people broke away from Vedas and Upanishad teachings, founded new religions by writing Puranic and Ithihasas. Selecting least important gods mentioned in Vedas to make important gods. (Shiva, Vishnu, Brahma, Shakti, Karthikeya and Ganesha.) Vedic and Vedantic followers didn't threatened through sword around the neck nor they smashed their idols or killed for blashphemy. That is Hinduism.

@DaēnāVanguhi 12 күн бұрын

It was a migration due to prehistoric climate change (ice age?/ younger dryas?) the Arya moved from southern Russia to central Asia and then to greater Iran and India, hence why Sanskrit and old Avestan are so similar, this is ancient history and now the Hindus and Zarathushtrians (Parsis) are brothers who just happen to worship and believe differently. No need for a war.

@mirhaideralikhan 12 күн бұрын

Indian Hindus do not believe this

@extreme4642 12 күн бұрын

The term Arya is native to North India and Iran, not Europe and Central Asia.

@praz7 11 күн бұрын

@@extreme4642because the term only originated in bactria

@dontreadmyprofilepictureplease 11 күн бұрын

The Aryan Invasion Theory is a racist and colonialist myth that has been discredited. The theory claims that Indo-Aryans migrated to India from outside the country. However, there is no compelling evidence to support this theory. there is also a myth spread by Europeans that poras defeated by alexander actually war ended in truce bw them.

@REALITY-bq7bp 11 күн бұрын

@@praz7 Rigveda never mentioned the places in the region of bactria or any other European region.

@dharma7766 2 күн бұрын

When Indians become proud of their civilization, it,s termed as Hindu Nationalism. When others do it, it's called National Pride.

@ballsmasher3000 Күн бұрын

Typical hatful nationalist comment. Doesn’t matter what the country is always like this

@mayurkanth6987 12 күн бұрын

Ohh boy the comment section is gonna blew up. Here before Indian nationalists, bjpists, congressis, pakistani, south indians, punjabis, sindhis gonna start civil war.

@kingslayer6551 12 күн бұрын

South Indians not Dravidian idiots from tamil nadu

@asurq123 12 күн бұрын

💀

@CoolSeriously 12 күн бұрын

Don't drag Pakistanis into this. We may have our issues, but whenever this particular topic is concerned, it's just you guys and your ethno-religious nationalist historical revisionist brainwashing agendas that have an issue with the subject topic at hand.

@bushy9780 12 күн бұрын

"start"

@Informational_Comparisons 12 күн бұрын

3/4 of them will be attacking Kashmiris. 😒

@Seriouslyfunny1 11 күн бұрын

In case anyone here isn't aware about the Indian rw, as many people here are claiming that indian rw says that Indian muslims are invaders. Thats factually incorrect. While it's a fact that Islam came to northern larts of India via invasion, the Indian RW claims that majority of Indian muslims today are actually descendants of Hindus who had comverted to Islam. Now I'm not a scholar of this topic, but this makes sense. Given the fact that Sultanate and Mughals were a close knit group and that their policy was of conversion whether by inducement or by sword. So it only makes sense that a good number of people might have converted. Indian RW claims that if a DNA testing is done, Hindus and Muslims will turn out to have mostly the same DNA because of their common ancestry. Indian LW and Islamic scholars on the other hand claim (many do) that Indian muslims are of Turkic origin and are descendants of the Mughals or Sultanate. Imo that doesn't sound sense. Mughals weren't Mongols afterall.

@Dheeraj-y4f 11 күн бұрын

Agree

@deepblue3682 10 күн бұрын

Weren't Mughals turkic-mongols?..

@mayan5600 10 күн бұрын

The first mughals who came . They came as invader. Because India had a vast agriculture and spiritual land. Plus, spice trade was great. Arabs used to come to southern part of India before Islam ever came to mecca. And there was a lot of interchange of knowledge. That"s why you see "hindu arabic numerals". But the invader came for wealth at first from the west not the north as you mention. According to my assesment. You may vary. 5-6 muslim invaders were bad. They were like british colonizers who wanted to destroy us. But later when mughals started to intertwine with each other and interreligion marriaegs started to happen. Mughals made themself at home an that's why urdu came into being. Lots of people got converted on the edge of sword with those 5 muslim invader rule and jizya and sword was the reson. But later mughals was good in the sense they made this land their home. For ex.- Brahmins were statesman in Akbar court and same way a muslim guy was the statesman in Maharaja chattarpati sivaji kingdom. same way hindus were in majority in a muslim kingdom (Hyderabad) and they were in opposition when India take them over during unification of India. Same goes for Kashmir under a hindu ruler. Tipu sultan might kill a muslim if he attack hindu in his region of rule. Justice was immediate. Same goes for Chattarpati shivaji. Even if muslims were innvaders that doesn't change the fact that muslim in India are not like europe. India muslims anncestors have been living in India ever since te inception. Only thing that change is name. Right wing in INDIA call them invaders because islam is not the reliigon of the land. It is abrahamic religion and hae its root there.

@Senku_Ishigami_1 10 күн бұрын

It's not the Religion 🤦 It's the politics and agenda behind it. We literally have an living breathing example of "Pakistan". These Indian Muslim never considered themselves as part of the Indian Civilization. Till this date, Invaders like Ghori, Taimur, etc who plundered and looted Indians are revered and honoured in Pakistan. Talk about the mentality.

@mohdjunaid787 10 күн бұрын

Bro it doesn't even need any evidence that hindus and muslims of sub-continent share the same heritage. It's common sense.

@His-x6b Күн бұрын

0:50 there no Hindu language, but hindi language. This is error

@AchyutChaudhary 12 күн бұрын

0:46 *you probably meant to say either Hindi (हिन्दी) or 🪯Sikh here…* Hindu is a religion whilst Punjabi is a language.

@s.davidson1783 12 күн бұрын

Not a big difference nor error actually. Common sense will do it's job.

@Kyuseishu- 12 күн бұрын

such a poor mistake.

@SpecialGlobalTalks 12 күн бұрын

Hindu was only religion code there is different religion believes in that sikh also called hindu because hindu us geographical identity more than faith or religion

@IndianKat 5 күн бұрын

@SpecialGlobalTalks that's literal meaning. Contemporary meaning of hindu means followers of hinduism and it does not include Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists.

@TheRealKasun 11 күн бұрын

Correction on the map at 0:12 - The Chola Empire didn't conquer Sri Lanka entirely as shown in the map. At some points they did get hold of the majority of the island, yes. But not not the whole country. It was mainly the north, north east parts. In fact no empire other than the British manage to conquer Sri Lanka entirely. EDIT: Just to be clear, this comment has nothing to do with race or language. Just pointing an inaccuracy, at least according my books. Peace.

@jojomathew8176 11 күн бұрын

They conquered it completely deal with it Sinhalese jeet

@TheRealKasun 10 күн бұрын

@@jojomathew8176 If that was the case then there wouldn't be any Sinhalese left. But there were the Kingdom of Polonnaruwa and the Principality of Ruhuna. I suggest you do some balanced reading. Might as well read about a guy named Vijayabahu I.

@zmc2585 10 күн бұрын

Tamil problem@@TheRealKasun

@user-jt3dw6vv4x 10 күн бұрын

@@jojomathew8176 "Sinhalese jeet" - you did not just say that. The utter irony of an Indian male using this term. A term created to describe you and a play on the names you people use. This is why nobody and I mean NOBODY likes India anymore.

@user-jt3dw6vv4x 10 күн бұрын

@jojomathew8176 "Sinhalese jeet" - you did not just say that. The utter irony of an Indian male using this term. A term created to describe you and a play on the names you people use. This is why nobody and I mean NOBODY likes India anymore.

@MlecchhaSlayer 11 күн бұрын

Some people in the comment section are so dumb and ignorant that they wouldn't hear the whole argument from the other side and start with their ad-hominem attacks like "You're a Hindutva nationalist" at least hear their argument you fools.

@dontreadmyprofilepictureplease 11 күн бұрын

@Kalki0025 11 күн бұрын

Don’t you think the theory that the Indo-European language originated in Russia is somewhat half-baked? Recent studies suggest that the Indo-European language originated in western Iran. Genetic studies have discovered a Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers component that spread to the steppe and a similar Iranian Neolithic component (in the Zagros) that spread eastward. This component was found in Bronze Age Anatolia without steppe ancestry. The Yamnaya were roughly 1/3 CHG or Iran_Neolithic. Iran_Neolithic ancestry comprises 40-60% of all modern Indians. Don’t you think Iranian Neolithic farmers migrated toward Russia around 7,000-8,000 years ago, forming the Yamnaya culture? Perhaps these people originated from Mehrgarh or Bhirrana in the Indian subcontinent, as India and Iran were better suited for human settlement 10,000 years ago than Russia, which experienced a cold and temperate climate heavily influenced by the last Ice Age. The cow is significant in Indo-Aryan culture. The Indo-Europeans were central to the domestication of the bull/cow, the invention of the wheeled wagon, dairying practices, and milk consumption. However, the cow was domesticated in the Indus Valley Civilization over 9,000 years ago and in Anatolia separately. If one believes the steppe people domesticated the horse and then entered India, this migration never affected the genetic lineage of Indian cow breeds. Cattle genetics conclusively prove that no admixture of Taurine cattle into India has ever occurred. It seems silly to think that Indo-Aryans came to India without a single cow. If we look at Russia, the Proto-Uralic language formed around the same time as the Indo-European language in relatively close proximity without any connection between them. In the Caucasus region or near the Black Sea, there are unrelated Kartvelian languages that formed around the same time or earlier than Indo-European. Do you think the Burushaski language in northern Pakistan might be related to a pre-Proto-Indo-European language, given that haplogroup R2 is significantly present among the Burusho people? Haplogroup R2 is estimated to have emerged around 15,000 years ago, likely in the Indian subcontinent, while R1 originated in Central Asia and R itself in West and South Asia. It seems likely that the Indo-European language originated in Iran, the Indus Valley, or the BMAC culture.

@nafisraihan6954 11 күн бұрын

@@Kalki0025 Vedic God Indra was invoked by the Aryans to loot the cows of non Aryan tribes and Indra did not disappoint the Aryans. In Vedic times, there lived an untouchable people in a village named Kikat, in todays Bihar. The used to rear cattle. Obviously to the Aryans this was a crime. So they invoked their god Indra to wage war against them and loot their cows. “O Indra, what do the cows make for you among the Kikatas. They neither yield milk for your offerings, nor do they warm the vessel of libation. Bring to us these cows, bring to us also the wealth of Pramagand (their King). O Brave one, grant us the possessions of the people of low status.” [Rigveda 3:53:14] On the basis of this clear pronouncement, non-Aryans and untouchables have no right to keep cows.

@Kalki0025 11 күн бұрын

@nafisraihan6954 The Arabs in pre-Islamic times worshipped 360 gods. The pagan Arabs worshipped the sun, moon, and the stars. The Arabs built temples to the Moon-god. Different Arab tribes gave the Moon-god different names/titles, and some of the names or titles are Sin, Hubul, Ilumquh, and Al-ilah. The title 'al-ilah' (the god) was used for the Moon-god, and the word 'Allah' is derived from al-ilah. Was the pagan Allah a high god in a pantheon of deities? He was worshipped at the Kaaba. Allah was only one of many Meccan gods. They placed a statue of Hubul on top of the Kaaba. At that time, Hubul was considered the Moon-god. The Kaaba, thus, was the 'house of the Moon-god.' The name 'Allah' eventually replaced that of Hubul as the name of the Moon-god. They began calling the Kaaba the house of Allah. The pagans developed religious rites in connection with the worship of their gods. The pagans practiced the pilgrimage, the Fast of Ramadan, running around the Kaaba seven times, kissing the black stone, shaving the head, animal sacrifices, running up and down two hills, throwing stones at the devil, snorting water in and out of the nose, praying several times a day toward Mecca, giving alms, Friday prayers, etc. Muhammad commanded his followers to participate in these pagan ceremonies while the pagans were still in control of Mecca (Yusuf Ali, fn. 214, pg. 78). Islam went on to adopt these pagan religious rites (Yusuf Ali: fn. 223, pg. 80). Al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat were called 'the daughters of Allah.' The Qur'an, at one point, tells Muslims to worship al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat in Surah 53:19-20. Those verses were later 'abrogated' out of the present Qur'an. They were called 'The Satanic Verses.' The crescent moon is an ancient pagan symbol of the Moon-god throughout the ancient world. It was the religious symbol of the Moon-god in Arabia, and stars were also used as pagan symbols of the daughters of Allah.Islam adopted the pagan crescent moon and stars as its religious symbol. As Islam developed over the centuries, it adopt pagan names, pagan ceremonies, pagan temples, and pagan symbols

@Kalki0025 11 күн бұрын

@@nafisraihan6954 The Arabs in pre-Islamic times worshipped 360 gods. The pagan Arabs worshipped the sun, moon, and the stars. The Arabs built temples to the Moon-god. Different Arab tribes gave the Moon-god different names/titles, and some of the names or titles are Sin, Hubul, Ilumquh, and Al-ilah. The title 'al-ilah' (the god) was used for the Moon-god, and the word 'Allah' is derived from al-ilah. Was the pagan Allah a high god in a pantheon of deities? He was worshipped at the Kaaba. Allah was only one of many Meccan gods. They placed a statue of Hubul on top of the Kaaba. At that time, Hubul was considered the Moon-god. The Kaaba, thus, was the 'house of the Moon-god.' The name 'Allah' eventually replaced that of Hubul as the name of the Moon-god. They began calling the Kaaba the house of Allah. The pagans developed religious rites in connection with the worship of their gods. The pagans practiced the pilgrimage, the Fast of Ramadan, running around the Kaaba seven times, kissing the black stone, shaving the head, animal sacrifices, running up and down two hills, throwing stones at the devil, snorting water in and out of the nose, praying several times a day toward Mecca, giving alms, Friday prayers, etc. Muhammad commanded his followers to participate in these pagan ceremonies while the pagans were still in control of Mecca (Yusuf Ali, fn. 214, pg. 78). Islam went on to adopt these pagan religious rites (Yusuf Ali: fn. 223, pg. 80). Al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat were called 'the daughters of Allah.' The Qur'an, at one point, tells Muslims to worship al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat in Surah 53:19-20. Those verses were later 'abrogated' out of the present Qur'an. They were called The Satanic Verses. The crescent moon is an ancient pagan symbol of the Moon-god throughout the ancient world. It was the religious symbol of the Moon-god in Arabia, and stars were also used as pagan symbols of the daughters of Allah.Islam adopted the pagan crescent moon and stars as its religious symbol. As Islam developed over the centuries, it adopt pagan names, pagan ceremonies, pagan temples, and pagan symbols

@eastwatch9833 11 күн бұрын

A video on the Rashtrakuta Empire and the Vijaynagara empire will be great👍🏻

@VYBCTV 12 күн бұрын

5:38 Kings and Generals modelled that warrior using Malayalam actor Mammooty. He used his characters in Pazhasi Raja and Mamangam as references to do animation. 😀

@Dheeraj-y4f 12 күн бұрын

മമ്മൂട്ടി ഉണ്ടോ 😮

@Humanzee 12 күн бұрын

Imagine Siju Wilson gaining a spot in Kings & generals video 😂😂

@VYBCTV 12 күн бұрын

@@Humanzee😂

@vamsikrishna3855 11 күн бұрын

That seemed quite racist. Wait Malayalam has heavy Sanskrit in its language

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

@@vamsikrishna3855 Among all Dravidian languages Malayalam, Telugu, Brahmin Tamil and Jaffna Tamil has the largest number of Sanskrit words. Malayalam is a combination of Classical Sanskrit and Middle Tamil developed 900 years ago.

@smithavempaty9136 11 күн бұрын

What a wonderful video log and narration! Many thanks

@hindurashtra63 8 күн бұрын

Even if some claim Aryans originated in Iran, We must not forget Ancient Iran (Kambhoja) and Afghansitan (Gandhara) are mentioend in Hindu Epics as part of "Aryavarta" (Civilized Continent). Arya means Civilized, the word is taken from Hindu Scripture. Therre is no mention of Arya being Race, It simple means "Civilzed People" who shave their beards, Follow a Social Structure and worship the Nature Gods. The Opposite of Arya is Mleccha (Barbarian). Also, Most HIndu Gods are infact Dark skinned - Yama, Kubera, Krishna, Varuna, Shani, Parvati, Rahu, Chandra, Rama, Kali, Shiva are all Dark skinned (Black). Why would Aryans who were White-Europeans worship Dark skinned Gods of Local Indus people ? Makes no sense, if Hinduism really was a Foriegn religion brouguht from Central Asia or Europe. Don't you think it makes no sense to associate Hinduism with Imaginary Aryans ? (Central Asians). No People would worship Gods of a different race, Its common sense. We see every Race make God in their image !

@bug4030 6 күн бұрын

It can be altered . Jesus was a middle east guy but look at the statues in europe . Muhammad was a middle east guy but look at his painting which is not easlity available in China or Central Asia , he literally looked like them. Ram and Sita of India and Thailand are complete opposite.

@escapedeviltrap 5 күн бұрын

Bro aryans were not a race,the whites altred history don't trust them

@Auros-ii8fr 3 күн бұрын

Do you know about the khas people of Nepal?

@ShapurTheLegend Күн бұрын

Hinduism is an offshoot of ancient Aryan pagan religions. The worship of cows was due to cows leading early humans to safe areas with water. So humans began to worship them. This later evolved to Hinduism. Aryans in Iran however developed Mithraism as a religion which shows Mithra executing a bull. That symbolises a breakthrough in spiritual understanding and no longer needing to worship animals. Zoroastrianism also developed from Aryan Iranians and emphasised monotheism and reverence of nature.

@Dheeraj-y4f 12 күн бұрын

Even the "dravida" word is Sanskrit origin

@deveryhenderson8335 12 күн бұрын

literally just ask chatgpt about the fake invasion and migration. these whities are so desperate its hilarious. the shame must be unimaginable.

@saureld2229 11 күн бұрын

There is a lot of loan words from Dravidian languages in Sanskrit.

@FizZ2864 11 күн бұрын

its a Sanskrit word for the south but Tamil does not have loan words to speak unlike Telegu and Malayalam.

@InsightGrid620 11 күн бұрын

@@saureld2229 and vica versa is also true

@ItsShahed17 11 күн бұрын

@@deveryhenderson8335 The migration of whtnot is true. I have 12 of Steppe Aryan ancestry and 78% Indus BA ancestry idc. It's not like im gonna be treated as a king because of it lmao 😂😂😭😭😭😭😂😂

@mrcraftiest 12 күн бұрын

I see 'Kings and Generals i click'

@shreyasp.b5761 12 күн бұрын

Recently the Harappan script was deciphered by a computer programmer named Yajna Devam. It offers very interesting insights about the language spoken by Harappans. According to his findings, the Harappan script is more related to Sanskrit than to Tamil.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

it hasnt been deciphered

@CHRS-ri5mf 12 күн бұрын

Yeah, he used cryptogram and mathematical logic. It's great

@drjagritisingh6569 12 күн бұрын

Dude the language is yet to be deciphered. Don't follow news 18 type shits.

@plazmagaming2182 12 күн бұрын

His work is absolute psuedoscience lmfao

@aesop1451 12 күн бұрын

What probably happened was a mix of invasion and migration, similar to what the German tribes did with the Roman Empire. Lombardy in Northern Italy has more Germanic influence than Sicily in Southern Italy, which is similar to the Northern Aryan and Southern Dravidian distinction in India. The Puranas and the Agamas are a retcon of the Vedas and the spirituality that derives from them is more aboriginal or indigenous. For example, instead of Indra, Agni, and Varuna you have Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu. In later traditions more emphasis is placed on goddesses like Kali, Durga, Shakti, etc. The Indo-Aryans were more patriarchal.

@mohammedalssamraey9581 12 күн бұрын

Origins of Islam and Aryan Invasions Two hell of a topics to gain attention Well done Kings and Generals 👏👏👏

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

today's Hinduism is not Vedic, it is highly diverse including various traditions similar of Indus animism, tantrism, and other traditions of bhakti, At its core, modern Hinduism embraces a multitude of deities, believes philosophies, and rituals, allowing for personal interpretations and expressions of spirituality. The worship of gods and goddesses, each embodying different aspects of life and the cosmos, is a testament to this diversity. Moreover, the integration of local customs and traditions has led to a vibrant array of festivals and celebrations, each with its unique significance and flavor.

@AmachiEligwe 12 күн бұрын

Literally what seperates Hinduism from Buddhism, Jaina and other Nashtika schools are the Vedas. It is Vedic. Including local customs doesn't make it non-Vedic, just more inclusive than say... the Abrahamic religions.

@Vivek-ib9st 12 күн бұрын

@@AmachiEligwe Actually, it's mostly non-vedic and at times with minimal Vedic influence. 70-80% of people who identify themselves as Hindu don't even know about the existence of vedas. And Hinduism is more like a mix of different folk religions. Most people have their family deity, village deity and clan/regional deity who are more important for them in most important occasion. Praying to major Hindu deities is a relatively new thing that started with the Bhagti movement. Before that these deities were not that mainstream.

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

@@AmachiEligwe yes but we are not following vedas and dont worship vedic gods such as indra, surya is exception

@Vivek-ib9st 12 күн бұрын

@@AmachiEligweWhat we read in theory is completely different from what we observe in real life. This nastik and aastik classification don't understand these nuances.

@user-io7sh7nx7c 12 күн бұрын

Only South Indian Brahmins follow Vedic tradition properly. Veda parayana, agamas, Vedanta, samkhya, observance of proper tithis, etc is alive in South Indians. North Indians have lost their tradition.

@mihir9002 6 күн бұрын

They completely ignored the mention of river Saraswati , as a mighty river in vedas. Which dried up around 2000 BCE. And the logic is that, if it says mighty river then it must be before 2000 BCE. And if all the other geographical places mentioned in vedas are from indian subcontinent. Then how they can indicate the origin of vedas as bacterian or central asian .

@Ayam-jw 5 күн бұрын

In recent studies,vedas were made in india

@nuralibolataev4474 11 күн бұрын

Throughout history, large-scale migrations, such as the Magyars into Hungary or the Anglo-Saxons into England, were not peaceful or benign-they were invasions that overthrew native cultures, religions, languages, and ethnic identities. To deny this is to rewrite history. The same is true of the Indo-European or Aryan migrations into India

@dontreadmyprofilepictureplease 11 күн бұрын

@infinite5795 3 күн бұрын

Its well known that originally Aryans arent native, but even Dravidians and Proto-Dravidian wasn't native to Indian subcontinent and came from Iran. I would like to know what Madrasi Ricebags and Moolnivasis (which they surely aren't in any way more than others) have to say. Even, the so-called Moolnivasis/STs aka tribes aren't native to India, like Santhalis/Mundas/Oraons/Khasis came from SE Asia (Austroasiatics). Sino-tibetans came from China or the Tibetan plateau in various migrations. Why isn't the Dravidian/Sino-tibetan/Austroasiatic invasions talked about? Dravidians literally wiped out the original people of the subcontinent aka people akin to the Onges and Jarawas, who live in Andaman Nicobar islands. The only reason why Tamizhs majorly are black and Kannadigas/Tuluvas are as far as Iranians, Balochis and Gujaratis.

@idktbhwtf-k9i 12 күн бұрын

i think it was aryan migration and not aryan invasion

@divyanshsingh7542 12 күн бұрын

Exactly... It was just a migration

@friendlyatheist9589 11 күн бұрын

Could not find a single evidence of any battle or genocide of any people. Calls it invasion .the brainrot of leftist academia

@bengalsultanate5034 11 күн бұрын

Migration and invasion both.

@ZaidQuraishi-f3y 11 күн бұрын

Migration and invasion as well , why you then call Rohingyas and Bangladeshis intruders,it's just migration

@idktbhwtf-k9i 11 күн бұрын

@ are u dumb? or just have low iq? they literally have their own country which was made because they didnt wanna live with hindus, and wanted a seperate identity. You are talking with a moden concept of a country, a country has fixed borders and there are rules and regulations on how to cross borders between nations, so obv rohingyas come illiegally hence they are intruders.

@vb98518 12 күн бұрын

14:08 you have referred to shiv lingam as shiva's penis which is wrong. Shiva linga means symbol of shiva it's meant to represent pillar of fire in which form bhagwan shiva first appeared. Linga means symbol.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

it is both. the union between linga and yoni, shaiva shakta symbols, represent creation of life and also represent other things.

@vb98518 12 күн бұрын

@preyalneupane1296 source?? Shiv puran and ling purana both don't recognise it as shiva's penis. If you know any other source do tell. Penis in sanskrit is known as shishna. Not linga. Linga means symbol.

@deandeathstrike9398 12 күн бұрын

@@vb98518 Hail to the mighty 🍆

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

root is ling/lingam means symbol, word stree linga mean symbol of stree(women) it doesnt mean women's peni$

@Thechezbailey 12 күн бұрын

Funny, I call my penis the "Pillar of Fire."

@bishalboro3782 12 күн бұрын

Fun Fact: India also has an ancient name “Aryavarta” which is a Sanskrit word meaning “Land of the Aryans”.

@SonofIndia1999 12 күн бұрын

It's religious and cultural things Not race or genetics or launguage It's originated in one of many rigvedic tribes - the bharata puru

@Mo.Sa. 12 күн бұрын

Not India. Few villages & towns around Ganges.

@vv6533 12 күн бұрын

@@Mo.Sa. BS. its all the way from himalayas to the vindhyas

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

@@SonofIndia1999 yes

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

@@Mo.Sa. no,aryavart is name of region from indus to the ganga

@HINDU-t7v 11 күн бұрын

Before of coming of Islamic invaders into the indian subcontinent All invaders including Greeks ,huns ,sakas , Persians, kushans accepted indian religion and culture of indian land which originate in indian land 👍

@nafisraihan6954 11 күн бұрын

Vedic God Indra was invoked by the Aryans to loot the cows of non Aryan tribes and Indra did not disappoint the Aryans. In Vedic times, there lived an untouchable people in a village named Kikat, in todays Bihar. The used to rear cattle. Obviously to the Aryans this was a crime. So they invoked their god Indra to wage war against them and loot their cows. “O Indra, what do the cows make for you among the Kikatas. They neither yield milk for your offerings, nor do they warm the vessel of libation. Bring to us these cows, bring to us also the wealth of Pramagand (their King). O Brave one, grant us the possessions of the people of low status.” [Rigveda 3:53:14] On the basis of this clear pronouncement, non-Aryans and untouchables have no right to keep cows.

@PM_Narendra_Modi_01 10 күн бұрын

@@nafisraihan6954heyyy Bot 😂 Why are Spamming false Information

@bug4030 6 күн бұрын

In conclusion of the behaviour of right wing of India When Aryan invasion : They are hindu so okay to displace natives as it is right , womp womp losers. When Mughals : How can they take two countries from us and are living among us, this is unfair. Even though majority of muslims have the same genetic dna of the locals of that region.

@shounakindulkar2649 4 күн бұрын

@@nafisraihan6954This is a wrong piece of information bro😂. Probably taken from some anti-India colonist content,etc. Firstly even 5000 yrs ago at the time of Mahabharat there's no word called Hindu. Hindu name was given to us by Arabs who referred to the people who stayed between Indus river and Himalayas. This aryan, etc stuff also isn't mentioned in any ancient literatures including Tamil too😂. Some western powers are jealous of India's progress so they create stuffs which confuse Indians on their own history😂.

@TechTraveler007 10 күн бұрын

Chariots have been found in the Sinauli archaeological site in Uttar Pradesh, India. The chariots were discovered in 2018, and are believed to be almost 4,000 years old.

@pnsasi4720 10 күн бұрын

that is bullock cart

@akashbhardwaj948 9 күн бұрын

@@pnsasi4720 😂😂😂 tiny bullock cart in warrior's pit.😂😂😂

@histarchus 9 күн бұрын

@@pnsasi4720 yes it is a bullock cart. There were no horses in india.

@Neo__01 8 күн бұрын

@@histarchus No it wasn't a bullock cart. Stop spreading misinformation. The archaeologists who excavated it themselves concluded that it was a chariot.

@theworld2603 8 күн бұрын

Dumbass just are jealous as how is there is chariot in India Lol cry more

@kanishkjoshi434 11 күн бұрын

Really love your channel bruv especially loved your series on Roman Civil Wars, Alexander the Great, Crusades and on Yuezhi Tribe.

@notankijigar 9 күн бұрын

The term 'Aryan' originated among the Indo-Iranian language speakers. The term was also used by the Indo-Aryan language speakers during the Vedic period in India. Aryan has absolutely nothing to do with Europeans. The Nazis made the claim that their 'master race' were Aryans. During colonial times europeans included themselves as Arya at the same time hating the original arya/aryans(indians) LOL.

@Light_spot_ 5 күн бұрын

Well, the colonizing companies were owned by turkic descendant Jewish east Europeans, they weren't really Europeans to begin with, and they certainly didn't look for European interests ,otherwise, they wouldn't be deviding the the IE world between European looking Indo-Europeans and Indian looking Indo-Europeans , they would've looked for further expansion of the IE identity all the way from EU to Asia ,not limiting it only to northern Europe

@notankijigar 5 күн бұрын

@@Light_spot_ They are already doing it. They are not calling every European as greek because of IE but they shamelessly use the indo Iranian aryan identity for europeans even used IE tocharians against chinese. Clearly shows europeans are stuck in colonial era.

@shounakindulkar2649 4 күн бұрын

@@Light_spot_Then if the britishers who colonized India weren't true Europeans then who were they? Antarcticans😂?

@benimtelefoncaliyor1dk 12 күн бұрын

Eurasian steppe Indic/Iranic peoples were not immigrants from the Near East but direct descendents of Andronovans, and the mixed character of the Indo-Iranian-speaking populations of Iran and India is the result of a new population spreading among aboriginals with whom a new language is probably to be associated. This conclusion is confirmed by the evidence of Indo-Iranian tradition. The Aryans in the Avesta are tall, light-skinned people with light hair, their women were light-eyed, with long, light tresses In the Rigveda light skin alongside language is the main feature of the Aryans, differentiating them from the aboriginal Dasa-Dasyu population who were a dark-skinned, small people speaking another language and who did not believe in the Vedic gods.

@justaguyfrom 12 күн бұрын

The indus valley people weren't native they were around 5,9 and already had the gene for fair hair and eyes due to admixturing with the iranic farmers.

@Itdoesnotmatter786 12 күн бұрын

Exactly, the Rig Veda literally talks about Indra crushing the Dasa Dasyu dark hordes. For the Aryans Indra was an important man who may have later been switched to a God however Indra is basically not worshipped at all today and in later “Hindu” texts he is ridiculed in some cases and outright put into a lower pantheon of “Godhood” in others although in the Rig Veda Indra was literally the most important. Does seem to hint at something being buried by later Brahmins.

@extreme4642 12 күн бұрын

@@Itdoesnotmatter786The modern Hinduism is predominantly puranic, and therefore puranic gods are predominantly worshipped like Shiva and Krishna. The puranic Hinduism evolved in the gangetic valley, whereas the Vedic Hinduism evolved in Northwest India. The main God of Vedic Hinduism is Indra, whereas the main Gods of puranic Hinduism are Shiva and Vishnu.

@satyamindnectar7052 12 күн бұрын

@@extreme4642 Shiva/Rudradev and Vishnu are also Vedic deities

@extreme4642 12 күн бұрын

@@satyamindnectar7052 No, they aren't. Shiva isn't mentioned in Vedas. Rudra is a different God.

@joshygoldiem_j2799 12 күн бұрын

14:10 No, no, no, no, no. Lingams ARE NOT phalluses. Instead, they're simply used to represent Shiva in an aniconic form. Similar to Muslims, Jews and Sikhs saying you can't represent God in a visual depiction.

@mahakalabhairava9950 11 күн бұрын

Plenty of ancient lingams look like penises

@gazibizi9504 11 күн бұрын

It is.

@Joseph-h2l1o 11 күн бұрын

That's flat out wrong. In most cases, they are. Ancient Hindus didn't think the human body was scandalous like the modern Hindus. So they used a penis to represent the worship of Shiva. And there's nothing wrong with that. Just accept that hinduism is a dynamic religion that keeps on changing, and don't impose current Hindu views on ancient Hindus

@Bloodwolf1472 11 күн бұрын

Yes it is let me prove it to you!!!! First the Lingam literally means Phallic symbol which is used to worship Lord Shiva And evidence Im presenting you is written in verse 1) Shiva Purana 1.16.104 - 105 : The phallus is united with vagina and vagina is united with phallus. For the sake of perpetual enjoyment here and hereafter the devotee shall worship the phallic emblem which is lord Śiva Himself. He is the sun giving birth and sustenance to the worlds. His symbol is justified in the coming into existence of things. 2) Shiva Purana 1.16.106 - 107 : Persons should worship Śiva, the cause of birth, in his phallic form. That which makes the Puruṣa known, is called Liṅga, the symbol. The unification and fusion of the symbols of Śiva and Śakti is thus called Liṅga. 3) Shiva Purana 1.9.43 : The phallic symbol and the symbolised Śiva are non-different. Hence this phallic emblem is identical with me. It brings devotees quite near to me. It is worthy of worship therefore.

@joshygoldiem_j2799 10 күн бұрын

To respond to each one of you who have challenged me up to now: Simply repeating "it is" without evidence doesn’t make it true. Lingams in Hindu tradition are aniconic representations of Shiva. The interpretation of them as explicitly phallic is influenced by Western Orientalist readings of Hinduism during colonial times. Even though some historical and regional practices may have included such symbolism, the predominant cultural and theological understanding sees the lingam as symbolic of creation, energy, and the cosmos, rather than reducing it to a mere phallus. You’re right that Hinduism is dynamic and evolving, but that doesn’t mean modern interpretations impose something new on ancient beliefs. Lingams were not universally understood as phallic symbols even in ancient times. The word *linga* literally means "mark" or "sign," not "penis." It's more appropriate to say that the lingam represents the *mark* of Shiva's infinite energy and formless nature, which transcends physical attributes. Yes, ancient Hindus had a more open attitude toward the human body and sexuality, but that doesn't mean every representation of the lingam was phallic. Context matters. The verses you’re citing from the Shiva Purana provide one specific interpretation, but they don’t represent the entirety of Hindu thought on the lingam. The Shiva Purana itself is a late text, composed over centuries, and includes regional interpolations. Additionally: 1. The union of the phallus and vagina (lingam and yoni) described in the verses is symbolic of the cosmic balance between Purusha (divine consciousness) and Prakriti (creative energy). This is a philosophical, not literal, representation. 2. The word "linga" translates to "mark" or "sign" and refers to the abstract and formless nature of Shiva. The physical shape of the lingam is often misinterpreted as purely phallic because of oversimplification by outsiders or certain sectarian texts. 3. Hinduism is vast, and texts like the Shiva Purana represent just one of many schools of thought. The dominant Vedantic and Shaivite understanding sees the lingam as an aniconic, sacred representation of cosmic principles, not simply a human reproductive organ. The reduction of the lingam to a phallic symbol disregards its philosophical depth and the diversity of interpretations across different Hindu traditions. While some texts and regional practices might suggest a phallic interpretation, they are neither definitive nor universal. This is why it’s important to approach such topics with a nuanced understanding of Hinduism’s theological complexity.

@stephenbendig9630 12 күн бұрын

It never ceases to amaze me that nations/peoples/cultures can actually believe that their 'home' whatever you want to call it is the only one in history that grew and developed without outside inclfluence/invasion/migration..... People moved and mixed in so many ways, no culture goes uninfluenced. even tribes that still exist have some, and those that limit, don't grow. Geeee, i wonder about the connection?

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

the first casualty of ultra nationalism is critical thinking

@extreme4642 12 күн бұрын

@@preyalneupane1296 The present Hindutva regime in India doesn't want people to know the truth.

@WickederDrake37 11 күн бұрын

Great thinking. I wonder why some people are racist towards Indians moving to Europe and then make up research like this that shows Indians are the real Europeans. In a sense, they are moving back to their homeland. 🤣🤣

@MongoIndyleo 3 күн бұрын

My personal theory is that the Indus River Valley Civilization was in major decline when the Aryans showed up and was basically not able to meaningfully resist them and some parts of it may have even welcomed them. The Aryans ruled over their new Indus subjects but loosely and more Aryans continued to arrive and be welcome by their brethren and Indus peoples and Aryans hybridized. This explains why the Aryans came slowly over time with little evidence of bloodshed.

@satyamindnectar7052 3 күн бұрын

Indo aryans are IVC hybridised aryan The term aryan nowdays mean steppe Genetic But in religious sense the word 'arya" was only used by Indo-Iranian

@habiz143 11 күн бұрын

@KingsandGenerals 0:47 Could you please make an edit here? The language is called "Hindi" not "Hindu".

@nerf2752 12 күн бұрын

14:06 This part is enough for me to conclude this video was 'badly researched'. Shiva's lingum means shiva's symbol. It is not a penis. Sources you have used to research are trash.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

Lingum is the representation of ideas and philosophy in form of the organ. The union between it and Yoni, another shakta symbol

@deandeathstrike9398 12 күн бұрын

Hail to the mighty 🍆

@abhishekmaurya1642 12 күн бұрын

please say then wat does lingum mean ???

@riteshyeddu 12 күн бұрын

@@abhishekmaurya1642 lmao I hope he knows what it means

@zzzzz653 12 күн бұрын

@@abhishekmaurya1642have you learnt Hindi grammar in school ? If so, can you tell me what pu-ling & stree-ling mean ? Does stree-ling mean female penis ? Use your sense before you believe BS about your own religion.

@xshandy5812 10 күн бұрын

The Indo-Iranians didn’t invade but migrated. And the Indo-Aryans are not from the Porto-Indo-European branch but from Indo-Iranian. Individuals with the R1a/b haplogroup cannot be accurately described as "Aryan" based solely on their genetic lineage. The term "Aryan" has historical and cultural meanings that go beyond genetics, including connections to ancient Indo-Iranian peoples and Nazi racial ideology. Haplogroups reflect deep ancestral origins but do not directly determine physical traits like skin color, eye color, or skull shape, which are influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors. While haplogroups help trace ancestry, they do not determine specific physical features. The Indo-Iranians split from the Indo-Europeans and migrated to Central Asia and other regions, later moving to North India [Indo-Aryans]. Only these people referred to themselves as Aryans, not those who migrated to Europe or Anatolia. I find it strange that you refer to the Indo-Iranians solely as Indo-European or Proto-Indo-European. The Indo-Iranians have their own branch.

@gautamkrishnan295 2 күн бұрын

Let's do some simple math to understand why Aryans *could* be indigenous to India. Assuming the DNA analysis is true, the generally accepted dates for the Steppe migration into India are around 1900 BCE and 1500 BCE. The collective number of individuals estimated (and academically accepted) to have come into the subcontinent is between a few thousand individuals to about 50 thousand, not at once, but during the 400-year window. However, here's some simple math: 1. The mature IVC phase was between 2600 - 1900 BCE, with an estimated 4 million (average) to 5 million people (at its peak). However, this number only denotes a snapshot of a single moment in time, and not the total number of people who would have lived during this entire 700-year prosperous period. Assuming about 23-28 generations during this period, each generation replacing the population of 4 to 5 million people, a collective total of 90 -140 million people would have lived over these 700 years. The peak of the ancient Egyptian civilization had a similar 4 - 5 million population (New Kingdom, 1550-1070 BCE). 2. The late IVC phase was between 1900 - 1500 BCE when the population significantly reduced compared to its peak during the mature phase. During this time, the population continued to decline and stabilized at around 1 to 2 million. The cumulative population across these 400 years was about 16 generations, at 24 to 32 million. Simply put, for the Aryan migration theory to be correct, one should agree that 50000 (accepted upper limit) Aryans, over 400 years, were able to replace (or significantly change) the language, knowledge, gods, lifestyle, culture, and history of 24 to 32 million people who would have lived at that time (assuming 28M avg). This ratio of Aryan vs indigenous population comes to a grand total of 0.18%. If you think my calculations are incorrect, please talk to an expert, or at the very least, ask ChatGPT. The real, unbiased question we should ask ourselves is, do you think that 0.18% (or 18 out of 10000 people) were able to "convert" the indigenous IVC population, or do you think they might have simply slipped in unnoticed? Would you bet on anything in life where your odds of winning are 0.18%? My money is on the rest 99.82%, and I would confidently argue that Sanskrit and everything that's associated with Hinduism today has its origins in IVC. Do not forget that the base of this 400-year period was built by 90 - 140 million people who lived in the 700 years that preceded. It was a massive civilization, ahead of its contemporaries, spread over a very wide area, with almost uniform culture, society, living standards, practices, and buildings down to the size of the bricks. An unbiased look at history should tell you that it makes sense that the IVC through its vast trade networks had an impact on surrounding cultures, and not the other way around.

@kevinroark5815 11 күн бұрын

Every Indian has some Indo-Aryan and some Indo-European and some Indo-Dravidian ancestry. We are all one and we all share blood. One Nation- One People. Jai Hind.

@melonhunter2604 11 күн бұрын

No they don't. stop making up reptilian euro nonsense. Indians are mammals.

@throatyv853 9 күн бұрын

indo aryan is part of indo european lol

@kevinroark5815 9 күн бұрын

@throatyv853 The term Aryan comes Iran, which is in the middle east. Iranian farmers settled in the Indus valley. So instead of lol, may be educate your ignorant ass.

@IndianKat 5 күн бұрын

There was no need of nationalism here. People who get divided over these 2000 year old historic things are not people but subhumans

@rajk.9098 12 күн бұрын

As an Indian I believe in the Aryan Invasion/ Migration possibly did happen according to genetic, linguistic & historic data. But this doesn't make my fellow Indians less Indian because our ancestors have been living here for thousands of years. At the end of the day everyone is an immigrant because mankind started from Africa.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

The main problem is that most indian think oneis aryan and other is dravidian. thats not true. for all mainland indians (excl. Andamanese and peripheral tibetan group esp. in northeast), the composition is same only the percentage varies by place and caste

@raja4521 12 күн бұрын

No not really, we Dravidians are not migrated from Africa but entire Indian plate broke off from Africa and merged into Asian plate, we never migrate on foot/chariot but on Indian plate itself. Infact piece of africa going to join Indian west coast 1000s of years from now

@rajk.9098 12 күн бұрын

@@raja4521 You are right about Indian plate breaking from Africa but it happened 200 million years ago while the first homo sapiens appeared 200 thousand years ago. There is no connection between these two events

@Welfu1 12 күн бұрын

I agree even tho some hindus may have converted to different religions including Islam they are culturally and genetically still the same people

@raja4521 12 күн бұрын

@@rajk.9098 No, evolution connected two events, Part of same species evolved to be homo sapiens in Africa also evolved to be homo sapiens in India. Just like Indian Elephant and African Elephants. Migration from Africa never happened but evolution of same species happened both on Africa and Indian Plates

@ThorDog16 8 күн бұрын

Thanks for making these videos for those of us who would like to have honest conversations about the topic.

@lordbloodraven9347 10 күн бұрын

Bro is priving about indio aryan theory but doesnt have proof why aryan didn't destroyed native culture.

2 күн бұрын

Even, the Word "Dravida" is Sanskrit 😂🤣

@LifeCompass121 4 күн бұрын

Thank you for giving me more understanding! very good video!

@rajdeeproy9741 11 күн бұрын

The main thing about the video is very properly discussed, it's a migration, not an "invasion" as we read in our school times in India, now we have to do further research.

@theawesomeman9821 11 күн бұрын

not that much of a difference. In both cases, the Aryans who conquered the Dravidians were not native to India.

@rajdeeproy9741 11 күн бұрын

@@theawesomeman9821Going into Aryans and Dravidian thing is debatable until and unless we get proper translation of IVC Scripts, and to be fair, if you are doing research, Both theories are different. "Arya" just means Noble or Honorable people as per the terms, your case comes from the the racial superiority of the Aryans which in turn comes from Max Muller who divided the Aryans into Two Faction, Eastern and Western Aryans, and emphasized much praise on the western Aryans, then we had Hitler proponent of that theory. The terms like "Dashyu and Dasha" indicates there was some conflict when two cultures clashed but it doesn't co-relate with the sudden large scale invasion proposed by British Archeologist.There was a constant Migration between the lands.

@annekeener4119 11 күн бұрын

Invasion is a loaded term, suggesting group A was superior to group B by conquering the area. Migration is a lot less loaded and presumed to be peaceful or mostly peaceful.

@theawesomeman9821 10 күн бұрын

@@rajdeeproy9741 I'm pretty sure the BBC ended the debate years ago. The earliest Aryan remains were found in Kazakhstan while the earliest Dravidian remains were found in India. Trust the science.

@rajdeeproy9741 10 күн бұрын

@@theawesomeman9821 Thank you for Sharing, but what does it Imply? apart from the invader and invaded logic

@Mr.KaganbYaltrk 12 күн бұрын

Asia's history is very complicated and rich everything could have happened

@truefact844 12 күн бұрын

Everything all at once or everything over time. That is the problem?

@Mr.KaganbYaltrk 12 күн бұрын

@truefact844 over time 👍

@KomalJogi-d8o Күн бұрын

0:49What is *Hindu* language tho?

@AdrianBoyko 12 күн бұрын

1:20 It looks like Jesus came to Earth and became a disciple of Indiana Jones.

@Memes_Hub297 12 күн бұрын

Come on aryan don't cry 😂😂...

@ishanchatterjee1587 12 күн бұрын

Underrated comment

@lindseykipp191 11 күн бұрын

That’s his name Joseph Christ Jr. We named the dog Jesus.

@Revivalism23 10 күн бұрын

What @@lindseykipp191

@darshanbiswas232 6 күн бұрын

The fact that you said Hindu and not Hindi, is enough to tell that you didn’t do your homework on the topic.

@Ayam-jw 5 күн бұрын

Said by a dude who sits warching bjp propaganda

2 күн бұрын

@@Ayam-jwAt least, we don't 🤤 😋 Dravidian 💩

@ShaileshRandive-u2f 3 күн бұрын

The Aryans are Humans who evolved in India during Ice Age when most Northern India was like Siberia And this lasted thousands of years. Maldives then was a Vast Island and developed as sea levels were very low, Water bound in glaciers. As Ice Age ended the Continental shelf of Lemuria or Kumarikandam started sinking, It's these people who rushed north to India and occupied the Indian peninsula, Local Aryan tribes resisted their advance, Those Aryans who didn't leave peninsula became the Tamil Brahmins who are very fair and pass off as Iranians. The Dravidian move north, blocked by Vindhayas to north and Sayhadris to west. The Dravidian march into Bengal and Bihar provinces of East only to be resisted by local Aryans. As population increased Aryan movement up to Turkey started and there were many local Aryans living under Ice Age, The melting Ice opens lands up to Russia. The Northern India and West Coast from Gujarat to Kerala we find Fair skinned Sharp featured people and east of Sayhadris we find short Dark people presumably from Lemuria which sank as Ice melted. As Plains of Brahmaputra were cleared of Ice Aryans, Dravidian as well as Chinese move in, The Chinese tribes were restricted to mountains while Aryans settled in valley and this is to day today as seen in Assam. The Bengali are cocktail of All 3 tribes with Brahmins very closest to Aryan and lower classes Mixed Dravidian Mongolian ancestors. The Aryans didn't come from outside They evolved in India, when Ice Glaciers covered most of the country. Rather the Ending of Ice Age saw their Country Invaded by Dravidian from Lemuria and Mongoloid from East. Day today we suffer infiltration from Bangladesh and it's we who are being invaded in our own homeland. The Aryans are to India what Eskimos are to Canada

@sooraj1104 12 күн бұрын

I'm not even 1 minute into the video, and the language you called as Hindu. Bruh.. it's Hindi.😢

@IndianKat 5 күн бұрын

Alright man I know your common sense sorted that out. Why being so butthurt. Enjoy the content

@llawliet57807 12 күн бұрын

I'll say my country needs to be developed eradicate poverty focus on education health technology. We already have tons of problem. This 'we wuzz this we wuzz natives you foreigner' things are so childish. Like im from north. So if someone calls me outsider what am supposed to do? Pack my bags sell my property and book my ticket and fly somewhere in ukraine/russia from where my ancestors came some thousands of years ago? Like is this really an important issue ? How about this why dont we pack out bags and and fly to africa because thats our home right ? This all religion ethnicity shit is used as political propagandas to distract people from real issues

@DaēnāVanguhi 12 күн бұрын

Well said, religion is personal belief, each thinking man for himself, and thus has no place anywhere near politics or the running of states.

@amalxavier5102 12 күн бұрын

Well no one told you to leave india,the thing is internet is full indians commenting they are the most powerful people and all the knowldge of current world is from india,and hinduism is the best religolion,these kind of comments makes people sick,no one wants to know more which is not interesting, indians need to stop asking for attention on the internet

@nectorsnow34 12 күн бұрын

So you must be doing something major to tackle Indian poverty. Are you? These topics are related to our history so saying it's childish, in my opinion is immature. Aryan invasion theory is mostly put forward without any concrete evidence or major proof. It was introduced by Max Muller, a German philologist in 1850s and 1860s and we all know what German did with the word "Aryans". It is basically made up to make people believe that superior "Aryans" migrated to India for 400 years during which time native languages became extinct, whole of North Idia started speaking Indo-European language. Native belief system crumbled, whole northern India started believing "Aryan" invented Vedic belief system. Tell me Mughals invaded India for thousands of Years massacred millions, enslaved women and children, tortured murdered people. Were they able to do it? British brutally colonized India for hundred of years through Divide and Rule policy. Were they able to do it?

@nectorsnow34 12 күн бұрын

@@amalxavier5102 And you on the other hand are a know it all, superior to all others, Aryans were the supreme beings who were able to do in 400 years what Mughals couldn't do in thousands of years and British couldn't do in 200 years kind of a guy. Aren't you?

@thesenate8477 11 күн бұрын

Lol exactly I'm south indian dravidian but I agree so many f00ls put focus on to we wuz not present day

@BestRaja 11 күн бұрын

Very well presented. I appreciate how this channel even explains how modern politics/nationalism affect historical research.

@SinningsValor 12 күн бұрын

Another amazing King's and Generals video. Keep up the great work guys I'm hype for what you're gonna bring this year.

@bishalboro3782 12 күн бұрын

Me as a Tibeto-Burma, watching this video and comment section

@freetamilnaduandsouthfromi2984 3 күн бұрын

As a Dravidian from Tamil Nadu. We still resist them till this day.

@rajan36742 3 күн бұрын

😂😂

@spleehk21 12 күн бұрын

I suspect it's a bit like the much better attested Turkification of Anatolia. The first Turks arrived from Mongolia and Central Asia into Iran and Iraq as an ethnically distinct martial elite. However, it gradually absorbed natives who assimilated. These "new joiners" picked up Turkish tongues but brought their genes with them. Turkish speakers gradually moved west in a process that lasted generations. By the time the Turkish language reached the Aegean, most of the speakers didn't carry the genes of the original Turkish speakers from Mongolia & Central Asia. A similar process may have happened in the Indus & Ganges plains in/since the late Bronze Age: a language & the culture(s) associated with it gradually spreading in a piecemeal fashion, sometimes peacefully, and sometimes not so peacefully.

@azi1720 5 күн бұрын

There was no "martial elite", and it wasn't a one time thing that happened, migrations were in waves that lasted decades or centuries in between. And funny you mention the aegean, since it's (along with the med coast) the most Turkic region genetics-wise, people from those places have 30-40% east asian genes and some physical features like slightly slanted eyes. So none of what you said is true, read more

@spleehk21 5 күн бұрын

@@azi1720 I think we are actually in agreement. 30-40% Asian genes (and even lower in other parts of Turkey) = 60-70% non Asian genes; yet it's now almost 100% Turkish speaking.

@azi1720 5 күн бұрын

@spleehk21 that's not different from most countries. Japanese speak a korea-adjacent language, yet their genetics are like half native. Persians speak an aryan language, yet they are by and large descend from much earlier zagrosian farmers. Same with india. Yet you make it sound like a couple of small tribes came all the way from central asia and forced everyone to assimilate, but that's not what happened at all.

@spleehk21 5 күн бұрын

@@azi1720 read my original comment again I said they originally arrived in *Iran and Iraq* as a distinct martial elite, but picked up new joiners from the natives in a gradual process. In that gradual process they also moved west. I also said it was a process that lasted generations.

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

Migration is a fact; all humans originated from Africa. However, the British used the Aryan invasion theory to suggest that Indians follow foreign religions and have always been under foreign rule, aiming to further divide them. While migration occurred, but today no one is pure like astrain painter . and there's no evidence that modern Hinduism originated in Eurasia. If it did, we'd reference of ritual on the banks of river Moscow or the Volga instead of the Indus and Ganges rivers. Today's Hinduism is not solely Vedic; it encompasses diverse traditions like Indus animism, tantrism, and bhakti. It embraces many deities and philosophies, allowing for personal spiritual expressions. The mix of local customs has created vibrant festivals, each with its own significance.

@drjagritisingh6569 12 күн бұрын

Aayan migration is well accepted world wide ,don't confuse it with aaryan invasion. Delulu indians like you are embarrassing for us indians.

@RONIT848 12 күн бұрын

@@drjagritisingh6569 YOU ARE REAL DELULU OR MAY BE LEFTIST BOT

@Felix_75320 11 күн бұрын

Human evolution is from Africa , and also Sumerian, Egyptian religions are older than Hinduism and Judaism also oldest religion. And also no religious as athiests or belief in one creator all these are in many parts of the world and also Animism is existed in some parts of Africa , Egypt ,etc and shamanism in different parts of the world . And also Mesapotamia , Egyptian civilizations are older than indus valley civilization. Europeans are no religious as athiests or slavic religion , not Vedic religion . But Aryans migrated from Central Asia steppes 2000 BC , Vedic religion is originated in 1500 BC ,Vedas are 1500-500 BC, later puranas written in between 300 AD-1600 AD and Dravidian beliefs or practices are also existed . Later both Vedic and Dravidian religion are mixed.And also hindu is derived from Sindhu ,geographical name, not religious name ,named by Persians . But there are many ancient religions as Sumerian , Egyptian religions and also Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh is 2100 BC older than Vedas 1500 BC and also Sumerian language is older than Sanskrit and Tamil languages .

@InsightGrid620 11 күн бұрын

@@Felix_75320 we anyone said that Hinduism and Judaism is oldest it means that they are oldest surviving religion they are major religion also followed by millions and bilions

@Felix_75320 11 күн бұрын

@@InsightGrid620 But, Sumerians religion, Judaism are originated in Mesapotamia region different from Hinduism. And also Judaism , Christianity are similar as Same God , Jehovah , and Islam also has similarities . But Hindu is geographical name derived from Sindhu, named by Persians, not a religious name . And as Vedic religion and Dravidian religion in the past ,later both are mixed.

@Parvathamma-hi3yl 7 күн бұрын

Aryan invasion is a theory based on 'trust me bro' philosophy.

@jpsnagi 12 күн бұрын

Hello, The language is Hindi and not Hindu. Check your video around 0:46. Hindu is a religion. My friends from western countries (European and Americas) often mix them up. This is important to folks from that part of the world.

@kanishkjoshi434 11 күн бұрын

You are comfortable to use a coined religious identity by the very invaders you hate?? In which book Ram or Krishna proclaimed they are Hindus?

@ishankelkar3243 7 күн бұрын

While you are at it, explore why the Tamil priests recite Sanskrit pooja rituals. Why Shiva is extensively worshipped in South also, if he was a God in the Sindhu civilization

@pakshirajan8585 12 күн бұрын

Amazing video as always Please make a video on the Vijayanagara Empire

@VYBCTV 12 күн бұрын

It is very interesting to note that none of the Indo European religions, whether it is Mycenean Greek, Roman, Celtic, Slavic or Germanic religions have told or discussed or wrote about a one absolute reality/singularity/one ultimate truth. (Ekam Sat) Only Indo Aryans of Vedic Period said about it. The energy which started at a single point, expanded throughout the universe as a time spiral through space from which everything you see, hear, speak, touch and feel came. All stars, galaxies, planets, satellites, living beings, gods and goddesses all came from this Brahman. (Ekam Sat/Absolute One Reality) RigVeda was the first to introduce this philosophical and scientific concept. This was biggest inspiration for Atomic Theory and Big Bang Theory. Rig Veda also tells about fusion of Hiranya Garbha (Golden Womb/Golden Egg) and Hema Bheejam (Semen) from which came first god Prajapathi (Later become Brahma in Puranic texts which was written during Mahajanapadha Period.) And Prajapathi created this universe and everything in it. Vedic Gods are very different from Puranic Gods. Vedic Indra was omnipresent god, main god, god who protects us, helps to win wars, he protect us from floods and famines, we pray to getting more yield through farming, to protect our horses, sheeps, cows and bulls, to get beautiful, intelligent and brave sons and daughters, to become more humble, to control our lust, to earn more wealth. Not a single Vedic yagna ends without praising or paying respects to Indra, Mitra, Varuna and Agni. In Puranas Indra become a snobbish, lusty, jealous and a coward god who depends Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, Shakthi, Ganesha and Karthikeya to defeat Asuras and Rakshasas. Puranic Indra is king of all demi gods and god of thunder, lightning and rain. Vedic Varuna and his partner Mitra are gods of justice, upholders of cosmic law, (those laws which determines how this universe should work, natural phenomenons should function) also judges what is morally right and wrong. Puranic Varuna is god of all waters in the earth's surface. Vedic Agni is the inner fire of desire and ambitions. Desire to achieve great heights in career. Desire to help people, desire to keep this earth a better place to live etc. Puranic Agni is god of fire only. Later Vedic texts focussed on more rituals and eager to lead luxury life through inter tribal wars and expansion of territories. (Battle Of Ten Kings/ Dasharajna Yuddham is a great example. That happened during last phase of RigVedic Period near Raavi River, Pakisthan Punjab. Bharatha tribe defeated all other nine tribes. Word Bharatham for India comes from Bharatha.) As opposed to RigVedic Period which gave more importance to philosophy, spirituality, advices to lead a simple life and not to indulge in unnecessary wars. Inorder to bring back people to Rig Vedic ideologies, Upanishads were written. Upanishads though began from the basics of RigVedic text, it explored much more on the ideas of absolute one reality (Ekam Sat/Brahman) through stories. Later Upanishads become ritualised too making way for Puranas. Manusmrithi was written for those residing in 16 Mahajanapadhas. (16 Republics) It was a law book which insists it's people how to do their duties, prescribes compulsory (but sometimes flexible) caste endogamy and duties of women. (Note : Manusmrithi is not Sharia Law it is like Old Testament Law. Only relevant on a particular large area and period.) Puranas and Ithihasas were written by those who broke away from Vedic and Vedantic way of life. They made least important Vedic gods like Vishnu, Shiva (Vedic Rudra) and Brahma (Vedic Prajapathi) into most important powerful gods. Sachi (Indrani) become Shakthi. Ithihasas were history told as exaggerated stories about great kings and dynasties. Ramayana and Mahabharata are two most important epics which describes the tales of Solar and Lunar dynasties. Bhagavatham and Bhagavat Geetha comes from Mahabharata. Bhagavat Geetha combines Vaishnava Bhakti (Devotion For Srimath Narayana) with Upanishadic/Vedantic Nyana (Knowledge From Upanishads)

@samarthpawar1504 11 күн бұрын

You might as well write a book after this long ass comment.

@VYBCTV 11 күн бұрын

@@samarthpawar1504Yes, thankyou. Rather than abusing me point out one single mistake in this post. No you can't.

@krishanchetan4496 10 күн бұрын

Here comes the lindu nationalist 🙏

@VYBCTV 10 күн бұрын

@@krishanchetan4496 If talking about philosophy and spirituality from our scriptures makes me a Hindu nationalist so be it. No other parties other than BJP, RSS, Bajrang Dal or VHP supports Hindu cause. They don't appease Muslims. Even Christians and Sikhs are voting for BJP. Many ex Muslims are openly supporting Hindu cause. The main reason for the growth of right wing is because non muslims of this country are fed up with dynasty politics, muslim appeasement and corruption of Congress and almost every regional parties. Read many of my posts I never denied Aryan migration into India. Before Aryans migrated from BMAC (it is from BMAC people, Sintastha pastoralists learned agriculture. Sintastha culture people came from Russia- Kazhaksthan border.) Zagrosian Iranian Hunters also migrated to form IVC by mixing with AASI people. AASI people are the oldest inhabitants in Indian subcontinent. Zagrosian Iranian Hunters came after it, later came Indo Aryans. I never claimed Hindus invented Pushpaka Vimana, Nuclear Weapons or Time Machine. Iam proud of my nation's history, languages, cultures, civilization, architecture, science, philosophy, spirituality, acceptance, tolerance, hospitality, diversity and amazing scenic landscapes. Hinduism is an umbrella term for many philosophical, spiritual, rituals and traditions. Such as Vedas, Upanishads, Puranas, Dharmashastras, Ithihasas, Agamas, Thantras, Advaitha, Dwaitha, Vishistadwaitha and Various Tribal Beliefs.

@apy2911 6 күн бұрын

So Aryan Invasion didnt happen.. But Aryan Migration did happen.. And you should have discussed more about Dravidian cultures, languages while discussing this topic..

@alinaanto 12 күн бұрын

Thank you for this video, this was very interesting! Now please make a series on gypsy people, how they were driven out of north India by the Muslims and their stay in Iran/Persia and then their arrival in Europe and then their departure from Western Europe.

@penoge 9 күн бұрын

The clashes in the Veda are clashes inside the vedic society which even reached the Rishis (shown in Rigveda). The source of the struggle was the defeat of the Daityas (which the Greeks call Titans) through the Devas (which the Greeks call Olympians). This led to the division of the vedic society in a part which continued to worship the Daityas and a part which worshipped the Devas. The worshippers of the Daityas were defeated in the battle of the ten kings with Sudas and expelled from India to the west. They founded the then iranian part of the vedic religion which differs from the indian part in terms of still accepting the Daityas as ruling gods and considering the Devas to be Asuras while the indian part accepted the Devas and calls the Daityas Asuras. According to Herodot this change in the ruling gods happened about 17.500 BC ("17.000 before the time of Amasis").

@AmachiEligwe 12 күн бұрын

The answer is yes. And the attempt to change it from invasion to just a "migration" have been nothing but semantic change, little change in the actual original argument. Indo-Aryan languages originated outside of India, Indo-Iranian in Eastern Europe(like Belarus) and Sanskrit in Southern Central Asia(supporting evidence of the Mitanni language essentially being Sanskrit). The migrants were violent and imposed their culture and religion on the natives (DNA, comparative & Rigvedic evidence). Elements of the religion are probably native, for example Jati element of caste are probably Harappan but Varna and the extent of caste restrictiveness is probably Indo-Aryan but that doesn't really change the core of the religion, being from the migrant Indo-Aryans. 6:34 It is possible for such a migration to still be violent. Like something like the Germanic migrations into Rome, different dialects, over generations but still conquering tribes. The DNA evidence I was referring to is Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women

@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA 12 күн бұрын

nice try

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

Imposed religion is a much harsh term. Much of the reason as to why folk traditions have been assimilated into hinduism has to do with 1st millenia hindu synthesis. And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now

@AmachiEligwe 12 күн бұрын

@@preyalneupane1296 the Rigveda mentions wars against the unbelievers actually reminiscent of Sassanid-Zoroastrian similar claims of destroying unbelievers. Now, both are probably exaggerations (certainly so in the latter case) and probably reflect the zeal of a revivalist period but even with that caveat, not like later Hindu Kings(like frankly most Kings) treated tribal religions with respect with most of them considered Dalit. "And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now" Can you elaborate on this?.

@preyalneupane1296 12 күн бұрын

@@AmachiEligwe By that i meant they didnt come in massive army and genocided the natives

@AmachiEligwe 12 күн бұрын

@@preyalneupane1296 This is an argument against the name of the theory not the substance of it. The 1800s Brits that proposed the theory by that name did not claim they were an army, the claimed that Indo-Aryan tribes(not armies) conquered and subjugated the Indo-Gangetic plain. Which the evidence supports, for example Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women.

@sharjesm 9 күн бұрын

Everybody is a migrant. Be kind. Have Empathy. The human species is literally one family.

@shounakindulkar2649 4 күн бұрын

That's already a saying in our Bharatiya Sanatan culture. Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam: one earth, one family

@suhaschandane3871 9 күн бұрын

The mathematical and linguistic research by Yajna Devam on Indus Valley Script not only proves that AIT did not happen but all the elements of Hinduism, which includes Vedas and Puranas, are indigenous to whole India.

@satyamindnectar7052 9 күн бұрын

So aryan migration happened ?

@josejoseph8725 9 күн бұрын

@suhaschandane3871 yajna devam crap is not accepted by archaeology department of India. So stop pushing his whatsaap research.

@kuralovien5524 9 күн бұрын

The Dravdians have proto Iranian dna more than adivasi tribals , that makes them migrants too.

@satyamindnectar7052 9 күн бұрын

Exactly do you agree with aryan migration ?

@kuralovien5524 9 күн бұрын

@satyamindnectar7052 I'm from tamilnadu, I agree with the fact that both Aryans and Dravdians are migrants to this country and tamils had a seperate civilization that was independent of Indus valley where people were practicing agriculture. Dravdian ideology is mostly confined to Telugu speaking community living in Tamilnadu due to the fact that they'd not be accepted otherwise in the state if they claim themselves as Golitis. The same thing with muslims too.

@satyamindnectar7052 9 күн бұрын

@@kuralovien5524 What is your hypothesis on similarities of Indo European languages ?

@kuralovien5524 9 күн бұрын

@satyamindnectar7052 the same as my facts on several genetic evidence suggesting that Dravdians share high percentage of Iranian pastoralist dna which makes them just as foreign to this land as Aryans. Human migration to India happened 50,000 years ago, Aryan migration happened 3500 years ago, Dravdian population came into existence around 5000-7000 years ago. So as you can see both are significantly much similar as compared to how many years the natives have lived here .

@kuralovien5524 9 күн бұрын

@satyamindnectar7052 there are similarities between Tamil and Korean, and even Tamil and ancient Mesopotamian, Sumerian languages. What's your point? Languages and words spread around the world from 14th century BC.

@nictonsummers1236 11 күн бұрын

Thank you for debunking a colonial propaganda

@SpongePoP_hatesTriangle_Pants 11 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

@nafisraihan6954 11 күн бұрын

@PM_Narendra_Modi_01 10 күн бұрын

@@nafisraihan6954LOL Don't Mix your Sh*t here Your Mohammad did the all these types of Looting 😂

@TruthseekerA 9 күн бұрын

@@nafisraihan6954jihadist spotted comments rejected.

@FaisalMansoor-zp2ek 10 күн бұрын

Could you guys cover the Nadar shah's conquest. This period of history is the least covered on the internet. It is also overshadowed by many other events during its time. It would be amazing if you guys cover it.

@nardi4613 12 күн бұрын

Great video although this disproves only a very narrow idea of what the Aryan invasion theory would propose. It's still very clearly a process of invasion even if it took many generations that weren't unified. It wasn't just "cultural blending".

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

Indian nation is not based on any language or any ethnicity. it is based on principle of unity and diversity, that's why country is survived and will remain undivided

@raja4521 12 күн бұрын

Not according to BJP, RSS and their supporters

@InsightGrid620 12 күн бұрын

@@raja4521 hinduism is itself based on that idea

@Krishnadevaraya-w7p 12 күн бұрын

@@raja4521 BJP didn't exist in 1947.

@Krishnadevaraya-w7p 12 күн бұрын

@@raja4521 Stop attending ricebag institute of technology and come to reality.

@Krishnadevaraya-w7p 12 күн бұрын

@@raja4521 BJP didn't launch ops against the Golden Temple of Punjab or aid the ethnic genocide against Sri Lankan Tamils.

@dhaisa 9 күн бұрын

The primary reason this period isn't classified as an invasion is that there was no clear defending force or established authority. The Aryans engaged in skirmishes with the indigenous populations, whom they referred to as "dasyus," but these conflicts were never large-scale due to the fact that the natives lived in small, scattered communities. Had the Aryans arrived after a significant passage of time, they likely would have encountered organized resistance similar to that faced by the Persians or Macedonians, thus being labelled as invaders...

@kevinroark5815 11 күн бұрын

India is the first multicultural and multiracial country in the world. It tolerated every religion and accepted everyone.

@SaintThomasAquinas1 11 күн бұрын

Why has there been so much ethnic and religious conflict, especially over the last 100 years?

@melonhunter2604 11 күн бұрын

does not mean a thing reptile. There is no such thing as Aryan or Dravida, stop making things up.

@kevinroark5815 11 күн бұрын

@SaintThomasAquinas1 Everybody is living peacefully, isolated incidents happen everywhere in the world. Compare that to Islamic countries where practicing Christianity or any other religion makes you a 'kafir' or an enemy to the country.

@KumolalaSavesta 11 күн бұрын

@@SaintThomasAquinas1 there isn't lol

@SHANSHOW- 11 күн бұрын

What about untouchable ?

@fenilkheni9494 11 күн бұрын

i remember being a kid an being told decisively that aryan invasions happened, even though i come from really hard core nationalist family. if this pattern countinues i will see invasion theory get fully debunked.

@yashrajGu 11 күн бұрын

Let's just all agree that it was slow process of people mixing together

@CHRS-ri5mf 10 күн бұрын

Sure

@ethlanrete6736 8 күн бұрын

It's already been debunked.

@ethlanrete6736 8 күн бұрын

@@yashrajGuNo it wasn't.

@fenilkheni9494 8 күн бұрын

@@ethlanrete6736 key word "fully"

@mohanbugasara 9 күн бұрын

the word Aryan itself is indigenous to India and appropriated by Europeans during the 19th century. We will of course see more of these "Aryan Invasion Theory" propaganda that European invaders brought culture, religion, and philosophy to India as the world starts appreciating more of Vedic culture, religion, and philosophy.

@grimsobad8545 9 күн бұрын

Wait till they find what yamnayas who civilised Europe looked like. 😂

@bug4030 6 күн бұрын

so you are just going to ignore the migration and genetic diversity ?

@grimsobad8545 6 күн бұрын

@@bug4030 Have you seen the decipherment of the Indus script by Yajnadevam?

@galenbjorn443 3 күн бұрын

They looks like européns😂 they dont look like dark Brown indians my dude. Litterly pictures all over and all of them shows how europén they look. Some salty indians are trying to make them darker. So funny.