Did the Turkish People Originate in Mongolia?

Рет қаралды 20,874

Күн бұрын

While the first thing that comes to ones mind when they hear the word "Turk" may be the Turkish people and the nation of Turkey, it may come as a surprise to many to hear that the Turkish nation and people can trace their history and origins to the eastern Eurasian Steppe, roughly corresponding to the modern nation of Mongolia. With this video we will examine the process by which the nomadic steppe peoples of eastern Eurasia know as the Turks lead the development of the modern Turkish nation in the Anatolian peninsula.
Hope you enjoy!
Interested in supporting the channel?
Patreon Account: www.patreon.com/user?u=813292...
Time Stamps:
Gokturk Khanate: 1:56
Oghuz Turks: 3:07
Seljuk Turks: 3:58
Conquest of Anatolia: 4:41
Ottoman Empire: 5:48
Post-World War I: 6:18

Пікірлер: 571

@yasarkaralar8297 5 ай бұрын

My son’s DNA test resulted we had grand grand parents from Mongolia, Siberia and Northern China Manchuria.

@nadirhikmetkuleli7335 10 ай бұрын

When Turks were living in present day territories of Mongolia, there was no Mongolia. Ancestors of Mongols used to live in further east.

@kagar3465 9 ай бұрын

Baseless claims. The ethnogenesis of the Turks and the Mongols started to form after the dissolution of the Xiongn7 confederacy. The title Khagan itself was first used by the Xianbei, a para-Mongolic people but then the title later on was adapted by the Turks. The ancestors of Turks and Mongols have long coexistence in the Eastern steppes because they themselves have the same origin. You hairy Greeks in Anatolia have nothing to do with the history of the people of the Eastern steppes and you are the ones who always try to claim it for your own....

@hamsolo5320 6 ай бұрын

Yea true. But same goes to Turks too, they came from the far east, relatively the same place as Mongols. So yea Turks and Mongols are closely related.

@nadirhikmetkuleli7335 6 ай бұрын

@@hamsolo5320 Cohabitation or living geographiclally in close proximity does not mean having common ancestors. It is well proven that Turks and Mongols do not share a common ancestory but had intense interaction. Turks and Mongols are not originally related but they became related due to long interaction between them. These are different things.

@stdona 3 ай бұрын

@@nadirhikmetkuleli7335 Turkey and Mongols are both desendent of Hunnu.And im little bit confused you are saying this two are not same people but its really complicated cz there are many different tribes almost hundreds of them united under one banner live in thousands of year exact same land as nomads right so its really hard to say who is who they worship same religion and language and they look exact same that time asian its proven thier sculptures so how do u know its different?

@ultrahigher6739 2 ай бұрын

@@stdona some mongols have turkic ancestry; 3 of the 5 dominant tribes of mongols which genghis khan united were turkic in origin, also donghu were the ancestors of mongolic people rather than hunnu. the huns can be described as a turko-scythian organization with a turkic ruling class. turks and mongols are not the same people.

@Regalya Жыл бұрын

Mongolia called Turkistan until 100 year ago. The term mogol more of a 19th century term. The "mongols" were called Turk or Tatar trough history. "Mongol Empire" were never called that it was called kür uluγ ulus (lit. the 'whole great nation')

@arima77 10 ай бұрын

why are u lying about whole nation?

@arima77 10 ай бұрын

most of the country's history books about part of us

@Regalya 10 ай бұрын

@@arima77 There are no lies here. Stop being ignorant and learn. IF you suspect go cite it, don't go call others liars base on your false asumptions. Mongol and Mongol Empire are 19th century terms. Mongols called Tatars/Turks trough its run. As it was TURKIC Federation just like the HUNS, Göktürks and so on. Division of the "Mongol Empire" fractured into *TURKIC* khanates like Chagatai Khanate,Golden Horde,Ilkhanate,yuan etc Where are the "MONGOL" if it was "MONGOL" Empire ? "Mongol Empire" Offical language was TURKIC UIGHUR Script, The writing on money is Turkic, 9 soldier out of 10 are Turk,Leaders,generals,Coincil are Turks, *Only* Etnicity that have privileges by law are Turks,lands it built Turk lands so where is "MONGOL" ??? Mongolia called Turkestan until 100 years ago! Did Chingis Khan EVER called himself or the empire as "MONGOL" in ANY HISTORICAL DOCUMENT ? No. So *DONT CALL ME A LIAR AGAIN!*

@kagar3465 9 ай бұрын

Both the Persians and the Chinese have records of the Mongols and even its predecessor the Khamag Mongol. It is only the Europeans who call every nomadic people they encounter as Tatar. They called Batu Khan and the Mongols Tatars when they invaded Kievan Rus just like how they call every other Turkic tribes Tatar. Why you Anatolians always trying to claim history that belongs to Eastern nomads? Modern day Turks don't even have nothing to do with the Gokturks. Look in the mirror, you will see you are European features. Be proud of your European blood instead

@kaanerdem2822 8 ай бұрын

@@kagar3465turks where mixed in the very beginning. If you look up into early chinese records about Turkic tribes, you will see they also describe their fysical appereance. Iirc a chinese ambassador once met a khan who was very hairy and had blue eyes, let alone how many of them where mixed with the chinese (tonyuquq stone inscription). Bulgars where a turkic tribe also whom they still exist but distance themselfs of their origin

@skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306 2 жыл бұрын

It is not *just* Mongolia. Proto Turkic urheimat proposed to be Northern Mongolia to central-south Siberia all the way to Irtysh and Yenisey.

@diplomaticdiary9230 2 жыл бұрын

Then how today's Turks have different eyes from Mongolians

@user-zp4de5lq9i 2 жыл бұрын

@@diplomaticdiary9230 because they’re mix of greek, arab and russian. Original Turkish people have lost their mongolic features long time ago

@yoattahehe2032 2 жыл бұрын

@@diplomaticdiary9230 its about biomes

@yo2trader539 2 жыл бұрын

@@diplomaticdiary9230 That's because majority of the modern people of Anatolia don't carry original Turkic DNA. Difference in admixture creates a continuum within the Turkic/Tatar speaking regions throughout Eurasia. The language/culture of the conquering Turkic minority ruling class was the dominant one, and slowly extended to the majority population over the past 1,000 years. Some times it's called "language replacement." Before Turkic became the Lingua Franca in the Eurasian Steppe, Eastern Iranian (such as Sogdian) was most likely the dominant language. The homeland of original Turkic tribes was in South Siberia and Mongolia. While there were many waves of migration over multiple centuries, most of the Turkic tribes were eventually pushed out westwards by the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. As such, regions that are the closest to the initial homeland tend to have higher Turkic admixture. (FYI, the Sakha tribes were pushed out northwards by the Mongols who still occupy their original territory near Lake Baikal.)

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Жыл бұрын

@@user-zp4de5lq9i Turkish,Turkoman,Bulgar,European Tatar from assimilation result

@tiryakidetiryaki784 2 жыл бұрын

The first Turkish state established the Great Hun Empire in 220 BC. The Huns, referred to as "Hiung-nu" in Chinese records, lived in the Mongolia region in the northwest of China.

@YOUTUBE_qwertY 2 жыл бұрын

That is proto mongolian empire. Grand parents of Chinghis Khan

@tiryakidetiryaki784 2 жыл бұрын

@@KZbin_qwertY There are already so many of Turks in Genghis Khan's army. Asian turk Hun State BC. It was founded in 220 by Teoman. Teoman, who gathered the Turks who ruled in the northwest of China under a single roof, is known as the ruler who gathered the scattered tribes for the first time. The Asian Hun State lived its heyday during the reign of Mete Han.

@YOUTUBE_qwertY 2 жыл бұрын

@@tiryakidetiryaki784 😂😂😂 do your research and visit Mongolia first you will learn a lot

@sktt1488 2 жыл бұрын

@@KZbin_qwertY not really.. Xiongnu fought proto mongolian dun ghu.. Cope harder..

@sktt1488 2 жыл бұрын

@@tiryakidetiryaki784 yaa bu genghis ordusunda türk vardı falan filan bırakın bu işleri yaa.. İngiliz ordusunda da bir sürü hintli vardı. Napcaz onu..

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

Average Turk has 35% Central Asian blood (and that’s paternally according to historical sources).

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Spreading fake informations, not correct at all.

@Vitoahsisishsgshu18383 4 ай бұрын

10%*

@vincentsun9575 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing Book of Kings! Again, another great video!

@sepulturaoftheforest2869 2 жыл бұрын

No lol. Ancestry DNA takes modern Anatolians for their Anatolian vategory. That is why Turks score so much Anatolisn. Turkics were always Eurasian. They were a mix of Schyto Sarmatians and Siberians. Seljuks who came to Anatolia were %25-%45 East Eurasian and modern Turks are %7-%25. GEDMATCH and Global 25 PCA calculators give us %25-%45 Seljuk ancestry. Not small at all..

@papazataklaattiranimam 11 ай бұрын

Intermarriage between Turks and Greek, Armenian and Georgian natives of Anatolia was not unheard of, although the majority of these unions were between Turkish men and Christian women. The children of these unions, known as 'Mixovarvaroi', were raised as Turks and were of the Muslim faith (although there were some cases of Mixovarvaroi defecting to the Byzantines). It is likely that these unions played a role in the eventual diminishment of the Christian population in Anatolia and its transition from Greek/Christian to Turkish/Muslim. [24] Vryonis Jr, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. California: Berkeley University Press. p. 176. The number of nomads of Turkic origin that migrated to Anatolia is a matter of discussion. According to Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi, there were 200,000 Turkmen tents in Denizli and its surrounding areas, 30,000 in Bolu and its surrounding areas, and 100,000 in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.[25][26]According to a Latin source, at the end of the 12th century, there were 100,000 nomadic tents in the regions of Denizli and Isparta.[27] According to Ottoman tax archives, in modern-day Anatolia, in the provinces of Anatolia, Karaman, Dulkadir and Rûm, there were about 872,610 households in the 1520s and 1530s; 160,564 of those households were nomadic, and the remainder were sedentary. Of the four provinces, Anatolia (which does not include the whole of geographic Anatolia but only its western and some of its northwestern parts) had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households. Between 1570 and 1580, 220,217 households of the overall 1,360,474 households in the four provinces were nomadic, which means that at least 20% of Anatolia was still nomadic in the 16th century. The province of Anatolia, which had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households, saw an increase of its nomadic population to 116,219 households in those years.[28]

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Again you!!! Fasık

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Republicanism: Republic; means a government in which the sovereignty belongs to the people. A republic is a form of democracy, and it means a regime in which the people have a say in the administration by governing themselves. Republicanism, on the other hand, means the presence of a republic in the state administration. It comes from the word "cumhur", which means people in Arabic. In this respect, the words "demos" and "kratos", where the words people and government come together, can be accepted as synonyms for democracy. Atatürk, for the Republic; He used the expression "the administration most suitable for the character and customs of the Turkish nation". The republican government has been added to the constitution since 1923 and is the first article of the constitution. In the second article of the constitution, the characteristics of the republic are stated. Accordingly, the Republic of Turkey is a democratic, secular and social state of law, respectful of human rights, loyal to Atatürk's nationalism. Atatürk adopted the democratic republic. Regarding this, he said, "The full and most obvious form of democracy is the republic". At the same time, Atatürk entrusted the republic to the Turkish youth and tried to ensure that the country is in constant renewal and modernization.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Tonyukuk (Old Turkish: 𐰋𐰃𐰠𐰏𐰀:𐱃𐰆𐰪𐰸𐰸, romanized: Bilgä Tuňuquq, lit. 'Tunyuquq the Wise', Chinese: 暾欲谷; pinyin: Tunyugu, Chinese: 阿史德元珍; pinyin: Āshǐdé Yuánzhēn, born c. 646, died c. 726) was the baga-tarkhan (supreme commander) and adviser of four successive Göktürk khagans - Ilterish Qaghan, Qapaghan Qaghan, Inel Qaghan and Bilge Qaghan. He conducted victorious campaigns against various Turkish and non-Turkish steppe peoples, such as Tölis, Xueyantuo, Toquz Oguz, Yenisei Kyrgyz, Kurykans, Thirty Tatar, Khitan and Tatabi as well as the Tang dynasty. He was described as a kingmaker by historians such as E. P. Thompson and Peter Benjamin Golden. Tonyukuk inscription; Çoklar diye korkmadık, savaştık. 𐰲𐰸𐰞𐰺:𐰓𐰃𐰘𐰀:𐰸𐰆𐰺𐰴𐰢𐰑𐰶:𐰽𐰉𐱁𐱃𐰶 - Tonyukuk English translation; We were not afraid of many, we fought. -Tonyukuk

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

How about let's talk Arab Lawrence or Kuteybe bin Müslim genocide of turks?

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

it has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.

@baybarshan2500 2 жыл бұрын

The Altai region is within Mongolian territory nowadays and it was also the center of the empire with the name TURK in it, the Gokturk empire. The previous ones were the Scythian and Hunnic empires.

@aminzand2200 2 жыл бұрын

Scythians were Iranic

@cydia1720 2 жыл бұрын

No altai is in siberia

@notorious9278 2 жыл бұрын

Scythians and Huns are not Turks you thief

@baybarshan2500 2 жыл бұрын

@@cydia1720 Depends on what you include when you say Siberia part of Altai is indeed n Russia, part in Mongolia, part in Kazakhstan and part in China.

@cydia1720 2 жыл бұрын

@@baybarshan2500 ik I found out later today but mongols are just off springs of Turks and Chinese bc if you look at Turk history it’s 4200-4800 years old and mongol not even a 1000 even Hungary and Finland is turkic bc Hungarians are dependents of Huns we Turks do not wanna be associated with mongols bc of their grim history and massacres even tho we aren’t but people has this stereotype calling Turks mongols when mongols are actually off springs of Turks so it’s opposite Turks were in Mongolia first then mongol came but Cengiz Han the first ruler of mongols was actually half kipchak Turk I think it was from Kazakhstan

@leventkaya7928 Жыл бұрын

"seljuk"s family/dynasty is of the kynyk clan of oghuz turks.

@Buydaa.M Жыл бұрын

Yes,Sir.

@movie9600 2 жыл бұрын

As Mongolian(halha nation). I think they from Turkmen karakum desert. Because turkish, turkmens have caucasian race and they same oguz tribe.

@yo2trader539 Жыл бұрын

The Tarim Basin mummies indicate that people living in the Tarim basin were Iranian/Sogdian in ancient times. The first records of Turkic tribes moving to the Tarim Basin were the Original Uyghurs who got kicked of Turkic homeland in South Siberia and Mongolia (by the Yenisei Kirghiz). Their direct descendants still live in China, and speak West Yugur and East Yugur languages. Interestingly, West Yugur is Turkic while East Yugur is a Mongolic language. This indicates that the original "Turkic" tribes in Mongolia and South Siberia were already ethnically mixed by 9th century. West Yugurs eventually moved westward to the Tarim Basin and mixed with Sogdians. They were later conquered by a different Turkic group from central asia.

@rusfarsermnibunlarturkundu3168 Жыл бұрын

@@yo2trader539 the term iranian didnt exsist back then sorry not sorry😂😂😂stop calling the people who never heard of iranian(i mean sogds) iranic.😂😂😂

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Жыл бұрын

Oghuz tribe from Gobi Mongolia migration to Jetysu Transoxiana

@nathan_408 Жыл бұрын

@@yo2trader539 this Easter Yugurs are Islamic too?

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

Tarim Basin was originally Tocharic not Iranic.

@Frikssskingg Жыл бұрын

Before the Gokturk empire, there were already Turkic tribes in Eastern Europe and Anatolia...

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Жыл бұрын

who😀???

@Frikssskingg Жыл бұрын

@@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Avars, Bulgars, Kipchaks, Pecheneks, Huns, Khazars,... 😉😉😉

@Svevladovich Жыл бұрын

@@Frikssskingg In Anatolia? It was all Byzantine. Turks arrived in 11th century. Learn history!

@Frikssskingg Жыл бұрын

@@Svevladovich you should learn history, there are old Turkic kurgans found over whole Anatolia, and there is probably a relationship between the early Turks and Troje.

@Svevladovich Жыл бұрын

@@Frikssskingg OK, send me proof and documents so I might consider about it, otherwise hearing these words from literally nobody doesn't ring a bell.

@orka6848 2 жыл бұрын

Well, Göktürk Empire is NOT the 1st Turkic Empire in history. It is the 1st Empire of Turks which carries Turk word in its name. However previously Turks have founded Empires such as Xiang-Nu (Eastern Hun Empire) or Saka Empire... Plus, Turks were not melted in between the so called Greek and Armenian people because they were mostly nomads(Konar-Göçer). There is still Konar-Göçer Turks in Turkey (Yörüks)... For example, I can follow my line age up until the Battle of Ankara... I'm one of descendant of one commander of Amir Timur (Barlas Turk) I can find my heritage by just looking at the clans names of my father and mother sides.

@Ismail-hx4qj 2 жыл бұрын

Your ancestors were on winning or losing side?

@teovu5557 2 жыл бұрын

The Saka were iranic, southern afghanistan and eastern iran is still called Sakastan and the largest ethnic tribe in modern Afghanistan is called the Sakzai and Sakazai.

@rusfarsermnibunlarturkundu3168 Жыл бұрын

@@teovu5557 this is wrong cause sakas were not iranic.they were part of gokturk empire and they played an important role information of kazakstan.thus the term iranic didnt exsist back then and none of them identified with iran.pls stop calling everyone iranic who has nothing to do with iranians.there are also 20 million azerbaijani turks in iran we are turkic too

@jonjonboi3701 Жыл бұрын

It is true that many of the Greeks were assimilated into Turkic society and same with the Anatolians

@DimitarFCBM Жыл бұрын

Least delusional and nationalistic turk

@godscroissant1539 2 жыл бұрын

Great video

@user-jh8gz1lo4e 6 ай бұрын

I am a Turk from Turkey. I have read some things and watched many videos about Turkish history and origin. Whatever is said, I think that the origin of the Turks is the result of the mixing of some Scythians or a similar community who went to the east with the Mongols or a similar distant Asian community.

@HatredForMankind 4 ай бұрын

Exactly. Proto-Turks were the mix of Scythians and Eastern nomads.

@343iz 2 жыл бұрын

There is so much swimmers in moments.

@Bike0r Жыл бұрын

Very good

@bookofkings Жыл бұрын

Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!

@Bike0r Жыл бұрын

@@bookofkings continue the good work friend :)

@bookofkings Жыл бұрын

@@Bike0r I appreciate it!

@VanaeCavae 2 жыл бұрын

So, could we assume that the ancestors of the Turks would have looked East Asian in appearance ?

@bookofkings 2 жыл бұрын

Good question. The answer can be a bit complicated. So the original Turks from the eastern Eurasian Steppe and Central Asian are often documented as having an East Asian or partial East Asian physical appearance. However, ethnic identity is often based upon language (ex. speaking a Turkic language), and does not necessarily correspond entirely with genetics. For example, peoples can adopt an ethnic identity by assimilation into a particular group, without necessarily, genetically descending from the original people whom that culture or language originated. So in the case of the Turkish people from Turkey (as opposed to other Turkic peoples such as the Turkic populations of Central Asia or Western China), their genetics are overall similar to the genetics of the people from surrounding regions (ie. Southern Europe, adjacent parts of the Middle East and the Caucasus), however they do present a smaller percentage of East Asian genes. So to summarize, it can be inferred that the ancestors of the Turks were primarily Anatolians who assimilated into the Turkic culture, with a smaller percentage of ancestors who originated from the Eastern Eurasian Steppe. I hope that clarifies things!

@kathywolf4558 2 жыл бұрын

@@bookofkings Thank you! Yes, that is more clear as to the basic DNA. A person raised or "assimilated" into a culture identifies with that culture in their language, belief systems and thinking slong with intermarriage. Although there are examples of people who kept their initial language and some of their culture of origin. I think there is currently evidence of absorption with some basic language and cultural traits left among the Celtic tribes that were spread from the Steppes west....??? Looking into it ....appears these groups were possibly traders and travelers and thus were spread far and wide with intermixing......???? The languages are Indo European based i.e. Gaelic, Welsh etc...and not of Germanic origin...... interesting subjects....and refreshing to talk with people who question and learn and have knowledge!

@yaxshibala 2 жыл бұрын

According to ancient dna samples of kök türük graves/kurgans modern Uzbeks and Turkmens are genetically the closest population to the ancient Turks...and modern turkmens and Uzbeks have in average 20-40% East Asian dna. In anatolia you can find Turks with up to 20% East Asian dna but also people who just got 5-10%, because anatolian Turkic people mixed with native people of Iran/caucasia/anatolia. Just look at modern turkmens and Uzbeks and you will see how ancient Turkic people looked like

@jonjonboi3701 2 жыл бұрын

There’s also a lot of Turkish people that look East Asian looking or Eurasian looking

@yaxshibala 2 жыл бұрын

@@jonjonboi3701 yes, specially the so called „yörük“ areas do have about 12-16% pure east asian dna components in average, this can be explained, because yörüks were the last ones who left the nomadic lifestyle behind and became citizens in bigger citys where they then mingled. By the way, medieval Turkic people who came to Anatolia like seljuks and other oghuz tribes were not 100% east asiatic. since there are no samples of oghuzs at the time, we orientate ourselves to karluk, kimak and köktürk samples which have an average of 30-40% east asian components

@harlaneric7963 Жыл бұрын

The Turkic part of the modern Turkish people were the Northern Oghuz tribes from Central Asia. The Hunnic invasion into Central Asia during the 1st and 2nd century AD formed the Yueban state which was the earliest known Turkic state in Central Asia. Its population was the Huns mixed with local Scythians. After a few centuries it evolved into the Kangar Union, from which the Oghuz Turks such as Pechnegs ,Kanglis and what was later the Seljuks and others originate, later they also founded the Oghuz Yabghu state. All in all, Oghuz Turks were not from Mongolia, but from central and southern Kazakhstan, and were a mixed race of Huns and Scythians from the start.

@jonam7589 8 ай бұрын

and Sythiyans were Eastern Iranians.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

first of all Iranian people don't drink Kımız, they don't buried their deads with horses, the names are not in Persian languages, they spoke Turkish, they don't erected Taşbaba/Balbals, and they don't where the same clothes as Persians or Greeks. Everything shows us that the Scyhians are Turks. Ashguz-Guz-Oguz-Skuz-Skyth-Saka-Massageatae-Turks.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

😂

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

ALL TURKISH PEOPLES, UIGHURS, KÖK-TURKS,OTTOMAN TURKS, BELONG TO THAT CENTRAL GROUP OF EURASIAN HUMANITY WHICH WE ARE CALLING SCYHTIAN. THE EARLIEST SCYTHIAN AND THE EARLIEST INDO-EUROPEAN WERE MUTUALLY INTELLIGIBLE SISTER LANGUAGES. THE AR AZ AS SA OR SU PEOPLES. AZ WERE IN SOME WAY ANCESTRAL TO KASSITES AND KHAZARS. WE MAY SUPPOSE THAT THIS SA POPULATION WAS THE LONG SOUGHT PRE-SUMERIAN. AFTER THE ARRIVAL OF THE SUMERIANS PROPER, THE SA PEOPLE SEEM TO HAVE BEEN PUSHED TO THE NORTH, TO THE NORTHERN MOUNTAINS, THE PART OF THE SUMERIAN WORLD DESIGNATED IN CUNEIFORM DOCUMENTS AS SABARTU. IN RECENT LITERATURE THESE PEOPLE ARE OFTEN CALLED SUBARAEANS. SUMERIANS WERE THE CREATORS OF THE FIRST HIGH CIVILAZATION IN MESOPOTAMIA. THE SUMERIANS WERE- THIS TRUTH EMERGES SLOWLY FROM THE RECENT PROGRESS OF ARCHEAOLOGY- THE PROBABLE BIOLOGICAL , AND CERTAINLY THE CULTURAL ANCESTORS OF ALL THE LATER PEOPLES CALLED SCYTHIAN. THE MEDES, ONE OF THE GREAT PEOPLES OF ANTIQUITY, WHO APPEAR AFTER THE ASSYRIANS AND BEFORE THE PERSIANS. THE ORIENTALIST JULES OPPERT ASSERTED (IN 1879) THAT THEY WERE A TURANIAN PEOPLE. THEY WERE PRESENT NOT ONLY IN CLASSIC MEDIA ; HERODOTOS WRITES ABOUT MEDES NORTH OF THE DANUBE. THE DAHA PEOPLE (DACIANS) RULE IN CENTRAL EUROPE WAS DEFEATED BY THE ROMANS, BUT DACIANS SEEM TO HAVE SURVIVED IN RUMANIA AND IN SOUTHERN HUNGARY TOO, WHERE THEY ARE CALLED TAHO. EARLY GROUPS OF THE DAHAE MAY HAVE INFLUENCED MANY PEOPLES OF ASIA. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THEY WERE THE ANCESTORS OF THE THRACIANS AND THE TURKS. THE HUNS IN THE WEST THEY WERE CALLED SCYTHIANS. SOVIET EXCAVATIONS HAVE SHED LIGHT ON THE SURPRISINGLY HIGH CULTURE OF THOSE HUNS (SCYHTIANS) WHO LIVED AND BURIED THEIR DEAD IN THE SIXTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES B.C. IN THE ALTAI MOUNTAINS.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

The only people you would see wearing pants were the ‘barbarians,’ and pants didn't get invented until men tamed the HORSE... ...Sometimes these pantaloons were made of the skins of animals ; at others of rich and fine tissues embroidered or painted in sprigs, spots, stripes, cheques, zig-zags, lozenges, or other ornaments. Sometimes they fit tight, at others they hang loose and fall in large wrinkles over the shoes. The Classical Greek did not even have a word for ‘trousers.’ 'Barbarian' meaning was :non-greek speaking.

@radiushadariah9010 Жыл бұрын

ancient Turkic people was sumerian people that migrated to central and far east Asia, then returned to Anatolia and beyond

@fkkggkkfdsadsa111 2 жыл бұрын

not mixed in anatolia... they are mixed with arian people in western gokturk khaganate

@nmomayezan 7 ай бұрын

I guess the mixture happend 2 times first in today central asia and then the tribes moved to Iran and anatolia and got mixed over there as well ,so no none of them got erased they just got mixed all together@@sepulvedablvd7846

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Research by anthropologists has revealed that the genetic cradle of the first inhabitants of the North American continent was the mountainous Altai region in southern Siberia. Theodore Schurr, Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted the research published in the Journal of Human Genetics in the USA, stated that the Altai region, where Russia, Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan intersect, is a key place where many peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years. According to the research, the first humans in the Americas their ancestors were one of these peoples and came from Altai, which is now part of the Russian Federation, between 20,000 and 25,000 years ago. These people with Asian genetic traits crossed all of Siberia and entered North America by crossing the Bering Strait, which was not flooded at that time. ERGENEKON THERE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 🇺🇸 Let me immediately point out that the Altai region, which scientists describe today; It is one of the most important areas of Turkish history. Because this is the homeland of the Turks. After the collapse of the Hyung-Nu (Hun) Turkish empire, the blacksmith Achina (Asena) tribe emerged in this region at the beginning of the 5th century. These Turks, who call themselves Ashina, which means "Noble Wolf", established the state known as the Göktürk Empire in history. These; In order to protect themselves from the enemies, they initially chose this steep area where the mighty mountain range intersects as their homeland. They called the point they were in Ergenekon, which means "Steep Slope". This information, the world-famous Soviet historian Prof. It is included in L. N. Gumilev's book called Ancient Turks. We also showed the connection between these Turks and blacksmith Turkmen in our work titled Turkish Identity. This blacksmith Achines; They held the technological superiority of Asia (iron technology) and made very valuable war tools. The geography described by the US Anthropologist Schurr is the place known as Ergenekon in our history.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

Most haplogroups in Turkey are shared with its West Asian and Caucasian neighbors，not Turkic peoples 33%J-J1+J2，Near/Middle East 24% J2: J2a+J2b J2 is Native Anatolian haplogroup,from hittite，Canaanite-Phoenician (North Levantine) In Europe, J2a is more common in southern Greece and southern Italy J2b is more common in Thessaly, Macedonia and central - northern Italy. Thus J2a and its subgroups within it have a wide distribution from Italy to India, whilst J2b is mostly confined to the Balkans and Italy 9% J1: It is a typically Semitic haplogroup（arab, jewish） J1 is known to be prevalent in Levant and Arabian Peninsula, particularly in Yemen (up to 76%),Saudi (up to 64%) , Qatar (58%) 21.6%GE，Near/Middle East G: 10.9%. Haplogroup G and subclades: most concentrated in the Caucasus it has also been associated with the spread of agriculture (together with J2 clades) and is "largely restricted to populations of the Caucasus and the Near/Middle East and southern Europe." E3b-M35: 10.7% (E3b1-M78 and E3b3-M123 accounting for all E representatives in the sample, besides a single E3b2-M81 chromosome). E-M78 is common along a line from the Horn of Africa via Egypt to the Balkans. Haplogroup E-M123 is found in both Africa and Eurasia. 21.2%R1bI Western Europe/Southern Europe R1b: 15.9%. I: 5.3% R1b=R1b1a+R1b1b R1b1a1a→Western Europe According to ancient DNA studies, R1a and the majority of R1b would have expanded from the Caspian Sea along with the Indo-European languages . Haplogroup IJ would have arrived from the Middle East to Europe some 35,000 years ago, then developed into haplogroup I soon afterwards. Haplogroup I is the oldest major haplogroup in Europe The national groups of Eastern Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1a/ Slavs or I2, while those of Western Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1b or I1 R1a1a1b1→R1a1a1b1a（Z282） R1a1a1b1a（Z282）-(Eastern Europe) R1a1a1b1a1(R-M458)-Slavs R1a1a1b1a1a (R-L260)-West Slavic nation/Polish people 12.06% Central and South Asia R1a: 6.9% R2: 0.96% L: 4.2% R (R-M207)/Proto-Indo-Europeans =R1a+R1b+R2 R1b→Western Europe R1a，R2→Central Asia→South Asia R1a1a1b2 (R-Z93) -(Asia)/Indo-Iranian languages Persians ←R1a1a1b2 →Indian india Brahmins R1a+LH，Afghanistan/Pashtun，Iranian people，Tajik，Tocharians/Xinjiang's Indigenous R1a1a1b2a-Z94 Andronovo culture R1a1a1b2a*-Z95 North India and Pakistan/Brahmins R1a1a1b2a2-Z2124 Afghan/Pashtun，Kyrgyz Turkic peoples K: 4.5% Q: 1.9% C: 1.3% N: 3.8% KF is believed to have originated in Asia. K=K2+K1 K2=K2a+K2b K2a→NO→N+O→N1a+N1b+O1+O2 K2b→K2b2/P→P1+P2 P1→RQ→（R1a+R1b+R2）+Q Five Y-chromosome haplogroups, C, D, N, O and Q accounting for 95% of the present East Asian males Haplogroup N is a descendant haplogroup of Haplogroup NO, and is believed to have first appeared in Indochina or South China approximately 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. The Liao River Civilization(遼河文明) 興隆窪文化 (Xinglongwa culture): 6200~5400 BC -> major Y-DNA: N 趙宝溝文化 (Zhaobaogou culture): 5400~4500 BC -> major Y-DNA: N 紅山文化 (Hongshan culture): 4700~2900 BC -> major Y-DNA: N O2 C2 夏家店下層文化 (Xiajiadian culture): 2200~1600 BC -> major Y-DNA: O2 N1a1-Tat mutation originated in East Asia and had spread through the Urals into Europe where it is currently most common among Finnic, Baltic and Eastern-Slavic peoples. Southern china N1→N1a+N1b N1a→Siberia → Eastern Europe/Northern Europe=Tatars N+R1a，Finnish N+I，some Slavs R1aI+N：Latvians，Estonians C2=C2b+C2c C2b1a1a P39→Native American C2b1a2a M77 →Tungusic，Mongolian，Turkic C2b1a3a M401→Kazakh, Hazara, Mongolian, Kyrgyz, Dungan C2c=C2c1+C2c2 C2c1→Buryat, Chinese, Korean，Japanese C2c2→Southern chinese Haplogroup Q-M242→Native American Yeniseian people/Kets(central Siberia） 93.7%Q In Siberia, the regions between Altai and Lake Baikal, which are famous for many prehistoric cultures and as the most likely birthplace of haplogroup Q Navajo 92.3%，North American Eskimo (Inuit)-Aleut populations 80% Chelkans 60%，Tubalar 40%-North Asia

@mojojojo692 Ай бұрын

Did the Turkish People Originate in Mongolia? YES. ONE OF THE BIGGEST CAPITAL OF ANCIENT TURKS STILL EXIST IN TODAY KHARKORIN (A LOCATION IN CENTRE OF TODAY MONGOLIA COUNTRY)

@gu2057 2 жыл бұрын

I know hoplgroup J2 is Mediteranian and Balkan so Mongols how can be Balkanian or Mediteranian ?

@furkanarkan9058 Жыл бұрын

j2 is a wide-spread haplogroup which had reached to even japan. Most of J2 carrier of central asia was BMAC people who also had.notable influence on formation of earylic turkic people. Early Turks/ Xiognu and Huns= BMAC+Scytho-Siberians+SlabGrave(Mix of east asians and south siberians )

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@furkanarkan9058 Haplogroup G, J, E，R1b are not an Turkic haplogroup They（Korean Japanese Mongolian Tungusic Ural and Native American）have never been exposed to Anatolian Turks. Turkish and Arab are distant relatives，not Turkic Haplogroup R1a came from the Central Asia but they are Indo-Europeans，not Proto-Turks The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria (northeastern China). They were partially agriculturalists but adopted a nomadic life. Than they started their journey to the West. (The Turkic migration). During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans/R1a). All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea（hg NOC）. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians K2b/Q.R1a

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@furkanarkan9058 West-Liaohe agricultural people/Manchuria=N1O2aC2 Origin of Koreans: Liao River/north East Asia (O2a+C2) + Korean peninsula natives (O1b2) Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). Origin of Mongols:Northeast Asia C2+K2a(N1O2)+K2b(R1aQ)

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@furkanarkan9058 K is thought to originate from the Central Asia or South Asia.K=K2a+K2b K2a-NO is roughly the ancient North Asian-East Asian gene. The N-M231 haplogroup became West-Liaohe agricultural people-Proto-Altaic，Northern Asian groups-Uralic+Yakut ，Eurasian steppe nomads-Turkic The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border，and separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 - Sino-Tibetan O1=O1a+O1b O1a Austronesians. O1b1 Austroasiatics O1b2 moved to Korea/Samhan people Origin of Chinese: Yellow River (O2a) + Yangtze River (O1b1+O1a) Origin of Tibetans :Yellow River (O2a) +Qiang tribes/Tibeto-Burman（D1a1） West-Liaohe agricultural people/Manchuria=N1O2aC2 Origin of Koreans: Liao River/north East Asia (O2a+C2) + Korean peninsula natives (O1b2) Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). Origin of Mongols:Northeast Asia C2+K2a(N1O2)+K2b(R1aQ) The N hg has appeared various times in Eurasian history: Xinglongwa culture> major Y-DNA: N The ancient Finn-Uralians perhaps may represent the first wave of migrants from the east long ago (maybe 5-12kya). The Finnish-Uralic are the result of the mixture of I (old populations of Europe) and N (Uralic), Proto-Altaic were mostly N with some mix of QR1a+C2b (native American/ancient siberian/Xiongnu/ gene). The Xianbei (proto-Mongols) may have originally been C2b, inhabiting modern Mongolia, but then later kicked to the northeast by the Xiongnu. Northeast China is mostly C2b (perhaps proto-Manchu-Tungusic) so that’s why most Mongolian-Tungusic nowadays have C2 hg. The K2b hg spread to west China, then split into Q1 and R1az93 K2b/R1a+Q1→Mongolia C2b→Bering Strait→Americas →Native American Native Americans Y-DNA ：Q1,C2b，R1a Scientists one theorized that the ancestors of today's Native Americans reached North America by walking across the Bering land bridge

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@furkanarkan9058 Origin of Japanese: Haplogroup D1a2 and C1a1 are suggested to have arrived into Japan during the prehistory of Japan, during the Jōmon period. D has its highest diversity within Tibeto-Burmese groups and the oldest D lineage was found im western Tibet and one sample in the Altai region. Y-DNA haplogroup D1, making up 40% of the Japanese male lineages Haplogroup D1a2a is found among the Ryukyuans as well as the Ainus, and is t hought to have been the dominant paternal lineage of the Jōmon people. K2a/NO During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Just over half of Japanese men belong to haplogroup O. The vast majority belong to O1b2, a lineage found especially in Manchuria, Korea and Japan, and O2a, the main Han Chinese paternal li neage. A negligible percentage of the Japanese belong to the O1a and O1b1 The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border，and separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 - Sino-Tibetan O1=O1a+O1b O1a Austronesians. O1b1 Austroasiatics O1b2 moved to Korea/Samhan people Approximately 3% of Japanese men belong to haplogroup N, a lineage that is thought to have originated in China some 35,000 years ago It is found at low frequencies in Korea and could have arrived with the Yayoi people. Alternatively, N1 could also have entered Japan via Sakhalin and Hokkaido, as it is present among eastern Siberia tribes Haplogroup N1 was found at high frequency in Neolithic and Bronze Age remains (4500-700 BCE) from the West Liao River valley in Northeast China (Manchuria) by Yinqiu Cui et al. Haplogroup N1 is found especially among Uralic and Turkic peoples nowadays, including among the Finns, Estonians and Sami in Northeast Europe K2b/Q Haplogroup Q is the dominant lineage of Native Americans, but originated in Siberia. it is possible that the tiny fraction of Japanese Q lineages came with Yayoi farmers. It is unlikely to have entered Japan through Hokkaido as it is not found among tribes at the eastern extremity of Siberia, nor among the Ainus. In conclusion, approximately 43% to 48% of modern Japanese men carry a Y-chromosome of Jōmon origin. The highest proportions of Y-DNA haplogroup C and D is found in northern Japan (over 60%) and the lowest in Western Japan (25%). This is concordant with the history of Japan; the Yayoi people of Sino-Korean origins having settled first and most heavily in Kyushu and Chūgoku, in Western Japan Haplogroup C is another extremely old lineage that left Africa approximately 60,000 years ago and spread over most of Eurasia. Two subclades of C are found in Japan: C1a1 and C2a. The first group to separate was C1, which colonized the Middle East and South Asia. One branch (C1a ) may have moved north to Central Asia and then split in two: One tribe moved to Europe (haplogroup C1a2,C1a2 is now nearly extinct in Europe.), while the other migrated to East Asia and survives today only in Japan (C1a1). Haplogroup C2a, representing also 3% of the population, is typically found among the Mongols and Siberians. It might have come with the Ainu through Sakhalin island and Hokkaido, or along with the Yayoi farmers from Korea. The second branch of C1 spread into South Asia, Southwest Asia, and Central Asia, where it is found today at low frequencies (C1b1a1). During this time, other C strains continued their eastward migration into Southeast Asia, where they split into four main regional clusters: The first branch colonized Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (C1b2a). A second branch went south to Australia, where they became the Aborigines (C1b2b). Another settled in the highlands of New Guinea (haplogroup C-P55). The fourth branch went as far as Northeast Asia (haplogroup C-M217) and is now widespread mainly among the Mongols (Kalmyks, Buryats, and Oirats), the Turkic peoples of Central Asia (Kazakhs, Karakalpaks, Uzbeks, Dolgans), and the East Siberian tribes (Chukchi, Itelmen, Nivks, Tungus). Furthermore, it is also common in moderate amounts among Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans, but also among several indigenous peoples of North America, including some Na-Dené, Algonquian or Siouan-speaking populations.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

The original Turkic people are East Asian. Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup Studies show: east asia people are C, N, O+（DQ）. Among them，the original turkic people N are very similar to O (chinese，korean，japanese), they came from the same gene haplogroup NO but absolutely different from J（J1+J2/Turkey） Type of east Mediterranean people. J1 is Arabic haplogroup J2 is Native Anatolian haplogroup,from hittite， Canaanites E1B is ancient greek,albanian and sub-saharan African haplogroup G-M201 is most commonly found in Georgia; it is found at even higher levels among many other regional and minority populations, such as the Ossetians, Turkish →60%-70%JGER1b，the Near/Middle East and southern Europe K2b/R1a+Q→Central Asian/ancient Siberian K2a/NO+C2b→Proto-Altaic/new Siberian Turks from Anatolia (the Turkish Republic) are not related to any of those people. A very small minority of people in Turkey carry genetic markers that are also found in Mongolia, Korean，Janpanese and elsewhere in Central Asia. This has to do with the fact that the Turkic invasion of Anatolia in the Middle Ages was mostly a cultural and religious one. Byzantines changed their language from Greek, Armenian or Assyrian to Turkic and their religion from Christianity to Islam.

@urkhun-han Жыл бұрын

I have great respect for you and what you wrote. Could you tell me how many Turkish genes there are in the Turks living in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey right now?

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@urkhun-han Human Y-dna: ABCDEFGHIJK Origin: Africa, AB stay in Africa CD enter Siberia and East Asia（about 60000 years ago） EGIJ stay in the Middle East Anatolian native Haplogroup：70%-80%EGIJ That's why Anatolians, Arabs, Iranians, Greeks.... they all have the same haplogroup：EGIJ FHK enter South Asia，K split into K2 and LT，L stay in South Asia，K2 enter Indochina，India natives：L+H K2 split into MNOPQRS “Eastern Turkic”-Xiongnu/Xianbei/Rouran/Mongolian/Manchu people, Ydna N1aO2aC2bQ1a form the Altaic language family（About 5000 years ago - 10000 years ago） “Western Turkic”-Eurasian - they look like Chinese-Russian mixed race The majority of Anatolians are still natives, not from “East Turkic” Those “Oghuz Turkic” invaders are mostly Western Turkic and they don't necessarily seem like asian（Chinese，Koreans，Japanese，Mongolian） The so-called “Western Turkic ”=half Indo-European, half East Asian 10%-15%“Western Turkic ” 0%“East Turkic”

@urkhun-han Жыл бұрын

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e thank you bro

@Ningame4 Жыл бұрын

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e you are right mostly but we dont have j1 dna.

@ordafles5360 8 ай бұрын

Why am I seeing this troll in every Turkic origin video?

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria (northeastern China). They were partially agriculturalists but adopted a nomadic life. Than they started their journey to the West. (The Turkic migration). During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans/R1a). All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea（hg K2a/NO+C）. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians K2b/Q.R1a Turkic people Genetic marker =K（K2a+K2b）and C2b K2a（N1a+O2）+C2b/Proto-Altaic K2b（R1a z93+Q1）+C2b/ancient siberian Proto-Altaic =Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic languages/Yakut+Koreanic+Japonic/Ainu K2b/R1a+Q1→Mongolia C2b→Bering Strait→Americas →Native American mtDNA=ABCD Mongolian=53.8％C2+10.8％O2+10.8％N1+4.6%P* (xQ,R)+9.2%R1a K2a/NO，Origin: mainland China, Indochina 1，N1+O2→Manchuria C2e/C1a1→Liao River Civilization 2，N1+O2→Mongolia，Manchuria C2b→Mongolian+Southern Tungusic 3，Manchuria O2+C2e/C1a1→Korean Peninsula→Goguryeo Koreans=Samhan+Goguryeo Korean = 20%-37%O1b2+(40%O2 +15%C2) 4，D1→ Manchuria C1a1/C2e→ Hokkaido →Jomon/Ainu Northeast Japan C12.5 + D 87.5 = 100% 5，Korean Peninsula O1b2+O2→ Yayoi people Janpanese=Jomon+Yayoi Janpanese=35-40%D1+(30%-35%O1b2+15-20%O2) 6，Proto Altaic NC→Siberia→Ugric/Northern Tungusic/Paleo-Siberian Second migration 1，Mongolia C2N1O2→Central Asia/Indo-European/R1aJ=Eurasian/The modern Turkic people 2，N1a→Siberia → Eastern Europe/Northern Europe=Tatars N+R1a (R-M458)，Finnish N+I，some Slavs R1a (R-M458) I2+N：Latvians，Estonians，Baltic 3，The modern Turkic people→Middle East /JGER1b=Anatonian Turks K2a→NO→O→O1+O2→O1a+O1b1+O1b2+O2 O1 Liangzhu/Hemudu culture Fujian O1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→ Austronesian O1a+C1b O1a，O1b1→Tai-Kadai/Baiyue people→Laos,Thailand O1b1→natives of Southeast Asia O1b2→Korean/Samhan Sino-Tibetan O2+D1a1 O2 → Qinghai → Tibet → Tibetan (aborigines D1a1 + O2) O2→Qinghai → Northern China → Han people/O2a2b+O2a2a → Manchuria/Dong yi people Y-chromosome haplogroup O2-M122 is a common DNA marker in Han Chinese, as it appeared in China in prehistoric times.Other Y-DNA haplogroups that have been found with notable frequency in samples of Han Chinese includ O1a 13,0% C- M217 12,0% N-M231 10,3% O1b 7,2% Q-M242 4,2% Tibetan=51.6% D + 33.9% O2 (M122) + 2.6% C-M217

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

Copy paste from unreliable History forum website😹😹😹😹

@tayfur77 Жыл бұрын

dude, we were shepherds, not farming, after all, we were nomads, how could we farm?

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

@@tayfur77 The Northern East Asian agricultural roots of the Proto-Turkic language have been corroborated in multiple recent studies, and "the Proto-Turkic subsistence strategy included an agricultural component, a tradition that ultimately went back to the origin of millet agriculture in Northeast China". Around 2,200 BC, the agricultural ancestors of the Turkic peoples probably migrated westwards into Mongolia and Southern Siberia, where they adopted a pastoral lifestyle, in part borrowed from Iranian nomadic peoples. The genetic evidence suggests that the Turkification of Central Asia was carried out by a dominant group with "primarily East Asian ancestry" (>60%; 75%), which moved westwards outgoing from Southern Siberia and Mongolia, and assimilated various different non-Turkic groups (mostly former Indo-Iranian locals R1a+J2+G), turning the population of Central Asia from largely Iranian-speaking into primarily Turkic-speaking, with different proportions of local West-Eurasian and newly arrived East Asian ancestries. Most modern Turkic-speaking Central Asians derive significant but varying amounts of ancestry from the Northeast Asian gene pool (c. 59.3-69.8%), the Iranian-speaking Central Asians, specifically Yaghnobis and Tajiks, display genetic continuity with Indo-Iranians of the Bronze and Iron Age, and have less Northeast Asian ancestry (c. 7.7-17.1%), highlighting that Turkic languages were primarily spreaded with Northeast Asian-rich populations.

@anotheryoutuberperson38 11 ай бұрын

My DNA test backs this up. I score an origin with the Amur Region, according to Illustrative DNA.

@skylinelover9276 10 ай бұрын

Real Turkic has eye of an east Asian... The Turks in north west Asian is only Turkic in linguistics not genetics.. Just like morrocans they only Arab in linguistics not genetics

@Lawliet_____ Жыл бұрын

An interesting perspective by: Turkish academician: Prof. Dr. Celal Şengör Mongolian academician: Tomurtogoo O. " Peoples of the Turkic race are nomads and therefore these people live togheter with their animals and not only keep their economy afloat by grazing animals but also by raiding their neighbours. As far as we know the first group that got contact with these people are the Chinese, now if we look at their sources (before BC) it writes that the "Tujue 突厥 came" in other words the Turks came. As you know this topic has been controversial for a long time by raising the question where the Huns(Xiongnu/Hiung-nu) of Metehan Turks? Now when the Chinese are talking about these people they call them "Tujue 突厥" and if we look at what they are describing like certain features that are beneficial for themselves, for example their army for these people (Chinese). The very first "unit of ten thousand" system (Old Turkic: tümän; Mongolian: Түмэн, tümen; Old Chinese: 萬, tman; Turkish: tümen; Hungarian: tömény;) that applied this are these people. They thought the Romans did but no it was used much earlier. This very concept an army of 10 like the very words: "onbaşı(10) - yüzbaşı (100) - binbaşı (1000)" originates from here and is very old and this concept has come to Dzjengis Khan as well and so he used this very same organisational structure in his army. Dzjengis Khan does not establish his capital where he was born but in Otuken - Mongolia (the very first capital of Turkic Khaganate and Uyghur Khaganate) in other words he preserves the Turkish tradition that this place is the capital because he sees himself as the continuation of these people. Look I went to Kharkhorin in Mongolia and nearby this place there is a town Karakurum and in this town the Mongolians build a huge monument and has 3 corners. And looking at the front side of this monument there is a giant map of an empire drawn and under this they wrote "Mongolian nation". Then you go to the back and you can see another giant map you can read Xiongnu/Hiung-nu nation so basically the nation that the Chinese refer these peoples as "Tujue 突厥". Then we go to the next side and you can read "Turkic nation" and there is also an giant map of the Göktürks and when I saw this I was shocked. And there I was with a friend who brought me there a geologist and scholar Tomurtogoo and asked him wait now this is your national heritage! (40km away from where the Orchoninscripties in Otuken are placed) and further I asked him what are the Turks doing here? aren't you Mongolians!? Tomurtogoo looked at me and explained: We do not make such a distinction, he said. When he says we are a nation, he means there, is a group that culturally, linguistically and to a very large extent biologically hold each other togheter because for this race the very physical attributes and characteristics are common to all of these peoples. They don't look like the Chinese, they don't look like the Tibetans in the south, next to them they don't look like the Indo-Europeans. Therefore there is an Turkic race, but the Romans rightly have known that these peoples have had great empires and are in population quite small. The nomadic economy cannot feed large populations. After the invention of agriculture, cities emerged and large populations were fed and also have been mixed with other populations. When the Turks went to the east they started mixing with the Chinese and when they went to the west they started mixing with the Indo-Europeans. Therefore racial characteristics decrease but that does not mean that there is no race anymore. "

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

İt has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

I wonder why xi jinping genocide uighur turks?

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

3800 YEARS OLD TURKISH QUEEN “BEAUTİFUL LOLAN( xiaohe)" When a comparison was made between the information of eyewitnesses and the mummies of Egypt and Turfan, it was seen that the mummies of Turfan, that is, the mummies of women, children and men, were made of different materials. There is a fact that scientists have revealed that for the first time it is revealed that the mummy culture developed from the Turks. If there was a mummy culture in Egypt, there must be a culture around it. There is no concrete evidence of mummy culture around Egypt. There is no such culture in Africa or Arabia. Therefore, there may be the existence of Turks who went to that region from Central Asia… The first mummies exhibited in Urumqi in China is 44 years old and dates back to 2000 BC, that is, 4000 years ago. Another is 2600, and as the oldest, there is this female mummy called Lolan, 3000 before birth, that is 5000. Now the most important feature is that her internal organs have not been removed. What else?.. The current state of mummies is much better than Egyptian mummies. It appears to be a high-tech embalming system. Moreover, there is a surgical scar on a mummy, stitched with horsehair. The detection of American doctors is considered one of the first operations or operations in the world. Also, plaid and dyed fabrics were found here. All these are currently on display in East Turkestan and Urumqi. There is no longer any doubt that the history of world life and culture began with the Turks. Although they hide it, they will still not be able to destroy the traces of Turkish history. The biggest difference of Lolan from the mummies of Egypt and other civilizations is that the mummification process was done without removing the internal organs and the surgical scars on the mummy's body (with sewing thread obtained from horsehair). This is considered to be the world's first known surgery.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Before it's too late xi jinping should stop genocide uighur turks like his following his dad footsteps.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

Origin of Japanese: Haplogroup D1a2 and C1a1 are suggested to have arrived into Japan during the prehistory of Japan, during the Jōmon period. D has its highest diversity within Tibeto-Burmese groups and the oldest D lineage was found im western Tibet and one sample in the Altai region. Y-DNA haplogroup D1, making up 40% of the Japanese male lineages Haplogroup D1a2a is found among the Ryukyuans as well as the Ainus, and is t hought to have been the dominant paternal lineage of the Jōmon people. K2a/NO During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Just over half of Japanese men belong to haplogroup O. The vast majority belong to O1b2, a lineage found especially in Manchuria, Korea and Japan, and O2a, the main Han Chinese paternal li neage. A negligible percentage of the Japanese belong to the O1a and O1b1 The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border，and separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 - Sino-Tibetan O1=O1a+O1b O1a Austronesians. O1b1 Austroasiatics O1b2 moved to Korea/Samhan people Approximately 3% of Japanese men belong to haplogroup N, a lineage that is thought to have originated in China some 35,000 years ago It is found at low frequencies in Korea and could have arrived with the Yayoi people. Alternatively, N1 could also have entered Japan via Sakhalin and Hokkaido, as it is present among eastern Siberia tribes Haplogroup N1 was found at high frequency in Neolithic and Bronze Age remains (4500-700 BCE) from the West Liao River valley in Northeast China (Manchuria) by Yinqiu Cui et al. Haplogroup N1 is found especially among Uralic and Turkic peoples nowadays, including among the Finns, Estonians and Sami in Northeast Europe K2b/Q Haplogroup Q is the dominant lineage of Native Americans, but originated in Siberia. it is possible that the tiny fraction of Japanese Q lineages came with Yayoi farmers. It is unlikely to have entered Japan through Hokkaido as it is not found among tribes at the eastern extremity of Siberia, nor among the Ainus. In conclusion, approximately 43% to 48% of modern Japanese men carry a Y-chromosome of Jōmon origin. The highest proportions of Y-DNA haplogroup C and D is found in northern Japan (over 60%) and the lowest in Western Japan (25%). This is concordant with the history of Japan; the Yayoi people of Sino-Korean origins having settled first and most heavily in Kyushu and Chūgoku, in Western Japan Haplogroup C is another extremely old lineage that left Africa approximately 60,000 years ago and spread over most of Eurasia. Two subclades of C are found in Japan: C1a1 and C2a. The first group to separate was C1, which colonized the Middle East and South Asia. One branch (C1a ) may have moved north to Central Asia and then split in two: One tribe moved to Europe (haplogroup C1a2,C1a2 is now nearly extinct in Europe.), while the other migrated to East Asia and survives today only in Japan (C1a1). Haplogroup C2a, representing also 3% of the population, is typically found among the Mongols and Siberians. It might have come with the Ainu through Sakhalin island and Hokkaido, or along with the Yayoi farmers from Korea. The second branch of C1 spread into South Asia, Southwest Asia, and Central Asia, where it is found today at low frequencies (C1b1a1). During this time, other C strains continued their eastward migration into Southeast Asia, where they split into four main regional clusters: The first branch colonized Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (C1b2a). A second branch went south to Australia, where they became the Aborigines (C1b2b). Another settled in the highlands of New Guinea (haplogroup C-P55). The fourth branch went as far as Northeast Asia (haplogroup C-M217) and is now widespread mainly among the Mongols (Kalmyks, Buryats, and Oirats), the Turkic peoples of Central Asia (Kazakhs, Karakalpaks, Uzbeks, Dolgans), and the East Siberian tribes (Chukchi, Itelmen, Nivks, Tungus). Furthermore, it is also common in moderate amounts among Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans, but also among several indigenous peoples of North America, including some Na-Dené, Algonquian or Siouan-speaking populations.

@brskididopdop Жыл бұрын

Hi my japan cousin there maps about türks who go to japan island from korea and siberia

@opansofian 11 ай бұрын

Are y Japanese?

@sigmaslibrary 2 жыл бұрын

We are not mongols but mongolians,tunguzs and other steppe nations are brother and cousins. Nowadays West Turks are native people and seljuk turks mix

@sigmaslibrary 2 жыл бұрын

@Dead what are you talking about? We have zero greek dna and we are not greek.

@sigmaslibrary 2 жыл бұрын

@Dead Anatolian Turkish Dna:Turkmen+Anatolian kzbin.info/www/bejne/kInCnX5to9-obqs

@Frikssskingg 2 жыл бұрын

@@sigmaslibrary anadolu 7000 yillik türk besigidir. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

@sigmaslibrary 2 жыл бұрын

@@Frikssskingg tamam

@343iz 2 жыл бұрын

@Хөөмий you are orthodox albanian

@otterkarman8740 Жыл бұрын

Great show, love it and mostly in general in condense form correct. But did you have to mention the sour subject of the Armenian genocide. You are aware that my family were given a choice!! and converted. Then choose to reside in Cyprus. Under British rule my great grandparents suffered and poverty. But went to a better life with a very large family now spend to all corners of the world.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Let's talk about Europeans genocide?

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

The first of the massacres perpetrated by European immigrant settlers from the Old World against the North American native US Native Americans in the New World was committed by the Spanish against the Timukua Native Americans in Florida in 1539, and about 200 natives were executed in this first massacre. In the second massacre carried out by the Spanish explorer and conqueror Hernando de Soto in the fort-city of Mabila in Alabama, a year after this first massacre, approximately 2,500 Choctaw Native Americans were massacred. After this first massacre by the Whites 47 years after Christopher Columbus arrived in America on his first voyage in 1492, more than 65 massacres of Native Americans were recorded on the territory of the USA. The last massacre of Native Americans on US soil was carried out by the Americans in 1911, and it is literally called "Last Massacre" in English.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Heȟáka Sápa Wounded Knee Massacre Black Elk Deer, the shaman who experienced the massacre, summarizes the massacre with these words: "At the time I couldn't understand how many people had died. Now when I look back from that high hill of my old age, I can still see the strangled women and children piled on the ground with those young eyes. And I can see that something else died in that mud and was buried in that blizzard. Yes, a people's dream died there.” - Shaman Black Elk Deer Heȟáka Sápa When Christopher Columbus discovered the country, the population of Native Americans tribes, which made up 5% of the world's population, is now negligible.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

I can swear before Your Majesty that there is no better nation on earth than these. They love their neighbors as much as themselves, they talk very sweetly and politely, and they always smile when they talk. With fifty men, we can subdue all of these people and make them do whatever we want. " - Letter of Christopher Columbus to the Spanish Queen With the discovery of the America by Christopher Columbus in 1492, the calm life of this new geography, which was called the New World, was suddenly disrupted. The Native Americans, accustomed to living in uniform on this continent for years, were suddenly exposed to the wrath of white people. The case that went down in history as the Native American Genocides is the genocides carried out by the White Europeans who reached the continent after the discovery of America, against the Native American people, the Native Americans living in this continent. These genocides, also called Indian Genocide, Native American Genocide, Native American Genocide, started in 1492 and continued for about 500 years. The genocides against the Native Americans were carried out consciously and in various ways.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

By Immigrant Europeans Applied to the Native Americans Genocide types Ethnic massacre and Ethnic Cleansing: It was deliberately practiced by slaughtering the Native Americans. Relocation of Native Americans: It was carried out in the form of taking the Native Americans from their geography to another geography. Native American Reservation-Native American Reserve: It was implemented as the closure of Native Americans to certain places. Smallpox: It was deliberately and intentionally applied by infecting the Native Americans with old world diseases. Activities of Christian Missionaries: They were forcibly taken from their families and trained by Christian missionaries in boarding schools in Canada and the USA. The purpose of this education is to make Native American children forget their mother tonque and culture and assimilate them. Forced Sterilization: It was applied to reduce the number of Native Americans and prevent their reproduction. Colonialism: It was implemented by exploiting the underground and surface resources of the continent where the Native Americans lived. It continues to be applied especially to Brazilian and Argentine Native Americans. Mourning Day in the Native American, Feast Day in the USA The start date of the genocide against the Native Americans, October 12, is a great day of mourning as viewed by the Native Americans. Because their quiet life changed as of October 12, 1492, and the winds blew in the place of their former lives. The USA, on the other hand, called this day Columbus Day.

@boisboy8782 Жыл бұрын

According to research Proto-Turks and Proto-Mongolian language families come from same origin with Koreans and Japanese.Though Mongolians and Turks being of different origin.Turks and Mongolians DNA similarity is because of this.Though Mongolians and Turks did live together for a long time.Turks were combination of tribes called "Boys".Mongolians were one of the Boys that formed an empire like their Turkic brothers.That means Mongols and Turks were separate people lived together to survive the harsh land they lived in but it doesn't mean they were of same heritage.As the research says they had their own languages separately.They come from the same place and were pretty to close to each other which explains why they had genetics similiar but that doesn't mean Mongols are Turks or Turks are Mongols.They were different people that bond together to survive.Also i saw people calling Anatolian Turks Armenian Greek and Kurdish.My answer to this a clear no.Seljuk Turks were first to enter Anatolia.Kurds (Merwanids) subjucated themselves to the Seljuks willingly.Kurds spread through a certain part of Anatolia.Armenians in the other hand was already genocided by the Byzantine.Destruction of 4 Armenian Principalities by the Byzantine is usually dismissed by modern historians.Armenians were under brink of total annihilation by the asimiliation campaign of the Byzantize Empire.Seljuks during conquest of Anatolia was spared by the Seljuks.Seljuks had the chance to destroy the Armenians but they didn't.Instead they gave them freedom of religion and bunch of other rights.During Ottoman rule of Istanbul they were given a whole new Patriarchate in Galata.Many Armenian provinces were Turkified thanks to Turkmens searching for new land to settle on.The same thing was applied to them aswell.Many Turkmens were send through the conquered lands to Turkify.Modern Anatolian Turk is actually a mix of locals and Turkmens than straight up being Greeks Armenians or Kurds because Turkmens were send to spread the Turkish genes and culture.So not all Anatolians are just straight up öne of the 3 i mentioned

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

According to pseudo-science*

@canturan4396 2 жыл бұрын

You forgot the mention Mongol caused migration. East and west EuroAsian steppe Turks who don't wanna join Mongols migrated to Great Seljuk Empire thus Anatolia.

@teovu5557 2 жыл бұрын

Seljuk art and statues made by them suggest they look strongly east asian.

@MarlonESolo 7 ай бұрын

Its differrence between ottoman turkish and turkic peoples

@almurabitun Жыл бұрын

The Oghuz Turks that settled in modern day Turkmenistan mixed with native Sogdian, Bactrians and other Iranic peoples.

@lifeneverends7068 Ай бұрын

Mongol is not a nation but one of the Turkic tribes. So of course we Turks and Mongols are related. Mongols look very different than east asians🇹🇷🐺🇦🇿

@sahilhossian8212 8 ай бұрын

Lore of Did the Turkish People Originate in Mongolia? Momentum 100

@vidisfury5328 11 ай бұрын

Genocide?? Which Genocide???

@Tengristshaman 4 ай бұрын

Turks came from Western according old chinese sources. Most of Central asian turks have west asian haplogroups like J1,J2,G . Old Turkic tribe names exist in the West asia : Kuman,Kangar,Kumuk,Subar(Sabir/Sibir), Turuk(Türük which is Gokturk), Qashqai and others. .... Old version our Agglitinative grammar and our Turkic words,Our mythology and religon(Tengri=Tenger=Dingir ,Assena=Assiniu,Goroghlu=Geroghle and etc... ) are west asian origin. Our culture is west asian too. Kam(Shaman),Ozan,Gopuz,Balbal,Tashbaba, andetc. ... I dont say turk to Sumerians. But sumerian epic name was Bilgamesh it is turkic word. Sumerian language was agglutinative , and had similar 200-300 words which are same to turkic words by meaning and form. Sumerians and Turks were neighbours in the West asia . Jules Opert which is greatest orientalist of Europea wrote it in his book of De La Languages des Medes : " It need to learn Uralic (Fin,Ugor,Magyar) and Turkic languages for to read Medes language because , Medes were from Saka tribes. They were speaking in the Uralic -Altaic language . Medes' language has more relative to Turkic languages than Fin-,Ugor,Magyar languages. " Other european scientistes like Zinaida Ragozine ,Igor Diakonof ,Amatole Klyosov , Jules Opert ,Niels Ludvig Westergaard, H.C.Rawlinson , E.Hincks , Stephan Zimmer,Mario Alinei,Gene Matlock and etc... sayed same things. There are a lot of evidences about it. Mario Alinei which italian scientist translated Etruscans' (they are west asian origin by dna too) textes with Turkic languages which europeans want but can not translate them with indo european languages. Europea has a lot of old toponyms too like Turk,Turugh,Turken,Turushka .

@tedchandran 2 жыл бұрын

Jai Hinduja. The Gokturk empire started off in Mongolia circa 900 AD. But the first ancestor of all Turks lived. further east in the Liao river valley 9000 years ago

@sktt1488 2 жыл бұрын

Not really. Gokturk khaganate was waay before 900AD..it was 400 AD or 500AD..I am not sure.

@oguztribesmen294 Жыл бұрын

Gök Türk Khaganate was established in the late 6th century.

@koksalceylan9032 9 ай бұрын

The Turks of Anatolia are Mixed people and First nomadic Turkoman waves were big but they were assimilated in to the indeginious populations that already was mixed. So The are no much Turkic people left only there language.

@satanshameer690 Жыл бұрын

Turkic mongolic and tungusic people are descendants of Amur river while Han, Japanese and Korean yellow river. They all descend from tianyuan man

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

1，The first North Asians：C2b（Tibet←D1→Japan） 2，The second North Asians：K2b/Q+R1a/Xiongnu/Paleo-Siberians/native american Haplogroup Q1→Xiongnu, Lake Baikal Yeniseian people/Kets(central Siberia） 93.7%Q 3，The third North Asians：K2a/N1a+O2/Altaic/Neo-Siberians K is thought to originate from the Central Asia or South Asia.K=K2a+K2b K2a-NO is roughly the ancient North Asian-East Asian gene. The N-M231 haplogroup became West-Liaohe agricultural people-Proto-Altaic，Northern Asian groups-Uralic+Yakut ，Eurasian steppe nomads-Turkic The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border，and separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 - Sino-Tibetan O1=O1a+O1b O1a Austronesians. O1b1 Austroasiatics O1b2 moved to Korea/Samhan people Origin of Chinese: Yellow River (O2a) + Yangtze River (O1b1+O1a) Origin of Tibetans :Yellow River (O2a) +Qiang tribes/Tibeto-Burman（D1a1） West-Liaohe agricultural people/Manchuria=N1O2aC2 Origin of Koreans: Liao River/north East Asia (O2a+C2) + Korean peninsula natives (O1b2) Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). Origin of Mongols:Northeast Asia C2+K2a(N1O2)+K2b(R1aQ) The N hg has appeared various times in Eurasian history: Xinglongwa culture> major Y-DNA: N The ancient Finn-Uralians perhaps may represent the first wave of migrants from the east long ago (maybe 5-12kya). The Finnish-Uralic are the result of the mixture of I (old populations of Europe) and N (Uralic), Proto-Altaic were mostly N with some mix of QR1a+C2b (native American/ancient siberian/Xiongnu/ gene). The Xianbei (proto-Mongols) may have originally been C2b, inhabiting modern Mongolia, but then later kicked to the northeast by the Xiongnu. Northeast China is mostly C2b (perhaps proto-Manchu-Tungusic) so that’s why most Mongolian-Tungusic nowadays have C2 hg. The K2b hg spread to west China, then split into Q1 and R1az93 K2b/R1a+Q1→Mongolia C2b→Bering Strait→Americas →Native American Native Americans Y-DNA ：Q1,C2b，R1a Scientists one theorized that the ancestors of today's Native Americans reached North America by walking across the Bering land bridge

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

Empero Gaozu of the Later Jin Dynasty was a Turk Denis Sinor wrote in the “Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia”: “In the 540s there appeared on the Chinese horizon a people previously barely known which, within a few years, not only changed the balance of power in Mongolia the traditional basis of great, nomad empires but also introduced into the scene of Inner Asian and world history an ethnic and linguistic entity which in earlier times could not be identified or isolated from other groups showing the same cultural characteristics. It bore the name Türk, an appellation left in legacy to most later peoples speaking a Turkic-language. [Source: The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, edited by Denis Sinor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990] “It stands to reason that the Türks of Mongolia were not the products of spontaneous generation and that one must, by necessity, reckon with other Turks living there or elsewhere in centuries preceding the foundation of the empire bearing their name. Yet, such considerations notwithstanding, it should not be lost from sight that the Türks are the first people to whom we can attribute with certainty a Turkic text written in a Turkic language, and that their name so widely used ever since their rise to power cannot be traced with absolute certainty before the sixth century A.D.”

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

" Writing a history is as important as making history. If the writer does not remain faithful to the creator, the unchanging truth takes a state that will shocked humanity. " MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK (1931) " Tarih yazmak, tarih yapmak kadar mühimdir. Yazan yapana sadık kalmazsa değişmeyen hakikat, insanlığı şaşırtacak bir hâl alır. " MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK (1931)

@user-rn6nb2ey7e 7 ай бұрын

@@tengriaslan2423 The root of East Asians, such as Chinese, Koreans, or Japanese, but also Northeast Asians, Siberians as well as Southeast Asians, Pacific Islanders and Native Americans, can be traced back to the “Ancestral East Asians” (also known as Basal-East Asians or basal East-Eurasians “bEE”).（CDK/nopqr） The ANEA/The Northern East Asian can be differentiated into broadly four sub-groups, namely the “Ancient Northeast Asians“ (ANA), “Neo-Siberians", "West Liao River farmers", and "Yellow River farmers".(NOCQ) Turkic, Mongolian, Tungusic, Korean, Japanese, Native American，they share the same ancestor - Ancient Northeast Asians, ANA and the Yellow River farmers (Han Chinese) are derived from the same ancestor - ancient North-East Asians This is the reason why they look alike Most modern Anatolian Turks have only about 5%-10% Northeast Asian DNA in average. In contrast, Kazakhs have about 70%-80% Northeast Asian DNA. Kazakhs are also a Turkic people. The Turkic Yakuts have about 90% Northeast Asian DNA. Thus today's Anatolian Turks as phenotype and genotype are closer to their neighbors A 2023 study published in the Journal of Systematics and Evolution analyzed the DNA of Empress Ashina, a royal Göktürk, whose remains were recovered from a mausoleum in Xianyang, China. The authors determined that Empress Ashina belonged to the North-East Asian mtDNA haplogroup F1d. Approximately 96-98% of her autosomal ancestry was of Ancient Northeast Asian origin, while roughly 2-4% was of West Eurasian origin, indicating ancient admixture The authors state that their results are consistent with a North-East Asian origin of the royal Ashina family and the Göktürk Khanate.This study weakened the Indo-Iranian hypothesis of Ashina tribe. However, they also noted that central-steppe Türks and early medieval Türks exhibit a high (but variable) degree of West Eurasian ancestry, which indicates that there was genetic sub-structure within the Türkic empire. For example, the ancestry of early medieval Turks was derived from Ancient Northeast Asians for about 62% of their genome, while the remaining 38% was derived from West Eurasians (BMAC and Afanasievo), with the admixture occurring around the year 500 CE. West Eurasian ancestry in the Türks combined Sarmatian-related and BMAC ancestry, while the East Eurasian ancestry was related to Ancient Northeast Asians The ancient Türkic royal family of the Göktürk Khaganate was found to share genetic affinities to post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists, while having heterogeneous relationships towards various Turkic-speaking groups, suggesting genetic heterogeneity and multiple sources of origin for the population of the Turkic empire. According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the royal Ashina family.

@99999orhan Жыл бұрын

Short answear yes

@misdefaith9869 Жыл бұрын

so, Mongolia was a deep brownish people and ancient people who lived in what is now turkey were also of a deep brown tone people. so, where did the whites come from?

@Anadolubozkurtu Жыл бұрын

@@Zurenarrh we are more related do Greeks than the central asian don't talk bullshit please

@Anadolubozkurtu Жыл бұрын

@@Zurenarrh chill greek

@Anadolubozkurtu Жыл бұрын

@@Zurenarrh kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJzYpYZ3obOImtk here greek it's for your reassurance

@Anadolubozkurtu Жыл бұрын

@@Zurenarrh peki yüzde kaç Anadolulu ve yünan çıktın türkiyeli?

@demi1789 Жыл бұрын

There are errors on your video . 1- Oghuz is a common Turkic word. The proto version of this word, Oghur . Which is why Oghur language called LIR (R-Z). Oguz is actually the forefather of all Turkic. OG (arrow) UZ (clans). in Xiongnu times. Arrow clans were mentioned also Modun chanyu letter to Chinese empress "Conqurer of All arrow clans" mentioned . Xiongnu backbone before Donghu (ancestor of Mongols) was Dinglings anyway..lets proceed. oghuz is actualy sembol of unifitication. anyway. 2- When Oghur migration occurred after collapse of Xiongnu. The remained population were Tokuz oghuz which created later UYGHURS. And Oghuz Krygyz, some other small tribes. This later forms a Turkic khanate. Unknown fact. Turkic never lived as singular because of Steppe nomadism. Where large population can't be sustained. This created immerse clans names which is estimated around 1500. We see Tails but also TOLES . These Both were some clan. It's more like unification name. This entity later creates almost all Turkics including Yakutsk except some Siberians minor clans. But know that. During gokturks or pre goktur there were other turkic clans like northern wei, Touba , which formed turco-mongol clans or Mongol-Turco clans. After collapse of second Turkic Khan kzbin.info/www/bejne/m6S0ZKB6jr17ZpI The majority were Under Uyghur, which is actually TOKUZ OGHUZ DECEDENT. Kurikan (yakut), krygyz, some tiele and many small clans live as solitary life without uyghur. but oghuz did live under Uyghur sometime. They disputed mainly after Uyghur manheism and other politics and begin to move west. 3- Karluks who were called UC-OGUZ (3 oghuz) formed and later known as karluk begin to accept islam . i don't give to much detail because . it;s very confusing and seeing many oghuz and some clans fights. Because oghuz. Anyway. After collapse of karluks , Bigges oghuz migration starts to west. Because Uyghur were destroyed and krygyz were push out from otuken by Mongols and some other Turkic groups which later they make the backbone of Mongol Empire and Qazaks. 4 this major event later push some of them and created gaznavids , pechengs, karakahanids etc . But remaining Turkic in the west like remain ants of Bulgar, Khazars, huns etc were absorbed by Main Oghuz chunk and created later Oghuz yagbu. So today, Turks were actually a uniform of many small clans between 800AD and 1600 AD. This entiy were called Oghuz which created the largest Turkic speaking group oghuz. So west was Oghur - oghuz and some dynasty muslim turkics eastern Uyghur moved to Xinjian region absorbing large karluk remainans and sogds. Some uyghur goes move east called Sarigurs. and 1 oghuz whom split from oghuz goes to gansu chine named (Salar ). 5- During Mongol Empire Eastern Turkic known as - Desti kypcak migration created Tatars, absorbing bulgars volga tatars, bashirs, Qazaqs. but some later fused with Karluks and absorbed some Oghuz, created TIMURID - karluks. Which is why Ozbek language is unique, has kypcak-karluk-oghuz . 6- and western turkic who absorbed many clans also fleed from mongols later created many dyntnasyts Seljuks, ottomans, Akkoyunlu, karakoyunlu, Safavids and Oghuz speaking language group. OGHUR oldest > OGHUZ KARLUK KYPCAK KYPCAK -KARLUK +OGUZ= Ozbek sakha (yakut) are during mongol invasion migrated to upper north ... Tuvan turkic were sakha ramains fused with mongols. altai, siberian small branches are migratory but closed tor Oghur-kypcak and other dialect.

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

Origin of Koreans: Korea C12.9 D2.5 N3.8 O1a 3.1 O1b 33.4 O2 42.1 Q1.8 In the case of East Asian Y-DNA, it was already mutated from NO to N, O2, O1, O1a, O1b1, O1b2, etc. from 30,000 years ago, during the Ice Age. The tribes could be viewed as being of the same genetic group. Each of these gene groups walked through Sundaland and moved to various places such as East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Siberia to settle there. The gene that arrived on the Korean Peninsula about 20,000 years ago was O1b2. As the Ice Age ended 10,000 years ago and the Neolithic Age began, sea levels rose due to the melting glacier and the Yellow Sea was created, and O1b2 was isolated on the Korean Peninsula. This theory is supported by recently excavated bones from Gadeokdo(가덕도, 加德島) in South Korea. They turned out to be 7000 years old, and were found to be O1b2. Around 2000 BC, O1b2a2 and O1b2a1 were mutated from O1b2 in south-east part of South Korea. Around 1000 BC, for some reason a part of the O1b2a1 group migrated to Japan (first Yayoi migration), where the population increased over hundreds of years. Around 200 BC, lots of Dongyi people from the north (Gojoseon, O2) migrated to southern part of K peninsula and founded a nation (Mahan). [Evidence: According to [後漢書], “King Jun of Joseon(Gojoseon) was defeated by Weiman, and led the remaining thousands of people through the sea, attacked Mahan, defeated Mahan, and established himself as the king of Han(韓).” According to [三國志], “With every dawn, many refugees flowed into Mahan's homeland, and Mahan was founded.”] Those migrated Dongyi (O2) mixed with the natives (O1b2). From that time, many peoples (O1b2 + O2) of K peninsula have begun to migrate to Japan (second Yayoi migration) until 660 AD when Baekjae was destroyed. Then, Qin migrants (O2) arrived in K peninsula and found a nation (Jinhan). [Evidence: According to [魏書東夷傳, 後漢書], “Jinhan (辰韓) people were refugees from Qin (秦) to avoid hard labor (苦役), and Mahan allocated the eastern border (Jinhan).” According to [三國遺事], “辰韓(Jinhan) is also called 秦韓.”] Then, after AD, another northern Dongyi (Buyeo, O2 + C2) arrived in K peninsula and founded Goguryo and Baekje. [Evidence: According to [魏書東夷傳], “Goguryeo was an another kind of Buyeo.” According to [後漢書], “Baekje was an another kind of Buyeo.”] That's why modern Koreans have O2(45%, Dongyi migrants from the north), O1b2(35% ~ 40%, natives), C(15%, migrants from the north). However, in Japan, the first Yayoi migrants were O1b2 and the second Yayoi migrants were (O1b2 + O2) (both from K peninsula). Thus, O1b2 population is two times higher than O2 (O2 arrived late on the K Peninsula). Yayoi migrants mixed with Jomon and became today’s Japanese.

@casablancatetouan4720 Жыл бұрын

Some Mongolians live in Turkey

@user-rn5sw3xy5f Жыл бұрын

And a plenty of Mongolian lives in Afghanistan and Pakistan who has name "Hazara" tribe. kzbin.info4mG-g3HN69s?feature=share

@Timurid1370 Жыл бұрын

@@user-rn5sw3xy5fhazara is Turko-Mongol

@user-rn5sw3xy5f Жыл бұрын

@@Timurid1370 Mongol > Turk

@user-rn5sw3xy5f 7 ай бұрын

Umut Bulut Emre Gungor Neslihan Atagul etc. these people from turkiye are looking Mongol trait. Provided that Turkey haven't Mongolian root they shouldn't has peoples like accordingly from above.

@hektor74 4 ай бұрын

Eastern Saka Schytes GökTurks Seljuks Ottomans Turks

@dexqce864 6 ай бұрын

Hungolian and Bulgolian are also Mongolian lost tribes

@ttbch9863 8 ай бұрын

👍

@MichailHordens 2 жыл бұрын

The genuine appearance and essence of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars, of many Turkic peoples and Russians: ‘Turkism, humanity, tolerance, democracy, justice and high material and spiritual culture since ancient times - in my opinion, their origins should be sought in the history of the Turkic peoples and popularized the knowledge gained around the world. That's what I'm trying to do...’ (an independent historian Gali Yeniky). First of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known data. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the real faith of Chinghiz Khan and his native people: for example, the Turkish traveler Celebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): ‘It is proved that Chinghiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)’. Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from us. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): kzbin.info/www/bejne/aYjUc2pnnNhomMU - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.

@todmagnai 2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha. Fake historian.

@teovu5557 2 жыл бұрын

@@todmagnai medivel tatars of the tatar confederation are a separate Mongolic speaking tribe enemies of the khamag mongols. They were NOT Turks. Modern Turkic speaking tatars are not real tatars but are Bulgars and other western Turks who adopted the term tatar after joining the Mongolian empire because tatar was a generic term for mongols and no Turkic group before Genghis khan's empire used it. Lol Fun fact everything I said can be found in most academic texts unlike your bullshit.

@kingoftheworld22 Жыл бұрын

if that’s true mongols must go on another horse ride

@MichailHordens Жыл бұрын

@@kingoftheworld22 Great idea! Tell them about it!

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

Origin of the Tungusic： C2b+K2a（N1a+O2+O1） 1，C2b/Northern Tungusic The Tungusic people are closely related to other Northern Asian populations and to the Mongols. The main haplogroup of the Ewenic peoples (Evenks, Evens, Oroqens, and Negidals) is the C2b1a2（M48）subclade (and especially its C-M86 subclade) of Haplogroup C2b. Besides the Ewenic peoples, C-M86 is also common among Mongols C2 Highest frequencies Oroqen 61%-91%C2b Evenks 12.9%- 71%C2b Ulchi 69%C2b Nivkhs 38%-71%C2b 2，K2a-NO (M214)=N+O=N1a+O2+O1 N1a/Northern Tungusic Haplogroup N Y-DNA is also found among Ewenic peoples with varying frequency. Haplogroup N Y-DNA among Evenks in the basin of the Yenisei River and the Taimyr Peninsula most often belongs to the N1a2b-P43 subclade, which they share mainly with the Samoyedic and Ugric peoples of Western Siberia. Haplogroup N among Evenks, Evens, and Negidals in Eastern Siberia (the basin of the Lena River and parts to its south or east) belongs mainly to the N1a1-Tat subclade, haplotypes of which they often share either with Yakut or with Buryat. N1 Highest frequencies Nenets people 56.8%N1a2b-P43，40.5% N1a1-Tat Nganasan people 92.11%N1a2b-P43 ，5%C，3%O Yakut people 94% N1a1-Tat (N1a1a1a1a4-M2019>N-M1993） O2+O1/ Southern Tungusic The modern Manchu people show relatively high amounts of Haplogroup O2, which is common among Chinese and Koreans, and Haplogroup O1b2, which is common among Japanese and Koreans. Korean=20%-37%O1b2+(40%O2 +15%C2) Japanese=35-40%D1+(30%-35%O1b2+15-20%O2) Sino-Tibetan Tibetan=51.6% D1 + 33.9% O2+ 2.6% C2 Y-chromosome haplogroup O2-M122 is a common DNA marker in Han Chinese, as it appeared in China in prehistoric times. It is found in at least 36.7% to over 80% of Han Chinese males in certain regions.Other Y-DNA haplogroups that have been found with notable frequency in samples of Han Chinese include 13,0%O1a+ 12,0%C2+ 10,3%N1+ 7,2%O1b + 4,2%Q1

@ksg9809 Жыл бұрын

5:07

@kilicmo 11 ай бұрын

No Turkic tribes and Mongolian are neighbors they make war , eat ,hunting ... together they are from same place

@Kaan_is_myname97 10 ай бұрын

Other than using the word Armenian "Genocide" ( Which did not occur. It was a relocation of Armenians in eastern Turkey to northen Syria. Istanbul Armenians were exempt from that and today up to 50k Armenians live in İstanbul ) pretty good video !

@user-rn6nb2ey7e Жыл бұрын

90% of Turks are Greeks, Armenians, Aryans, Levantines etc.. from Mediteranian and Balkan who were conquered by Turkic people The biggest error that pan-Turks making is that they believe everyone will magically turn into Turkic ethnicity once 1) the ruler is Turkic 2) when the land is conquered by Turkic ruler The genes that you have in your body right now make up your genotype（Ydna and Mtdna）. This genotype then determines your physical appearance The original Turks were Asian looking and are still like that: Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Yakuts, Tuvas the ancient northeast asians were closley realted to Turkic (old), Mongolic and Tungusic people. Koreans are northeast asians mixed with east asians from southern/central china. Japanese are mixed with Yamato migrates from Korea and as well with the indigenous Ainu people. mongolians,tunguzs and other steppe nations are brother and cousins.

@BT2001 Жыл бұрын

So 10 % fucked the shit out of 90% ??😂🫡 even my heritage says somthing else, i, m 75 % central asian and nearly everyone from my city called cankiri looks like me

@Willxdiana Жыл бұрын

@@BT2001 are you a turco man from Turkmenistan?

@Willxdiana Жыл бұрын

@@BT2001 even Kazakhs and turco man don’t score that high

@lifeneverends7068 Ай бұрын

We Anatolian Turks come from a gray shewolf and a human boy who breeded her. That is why genetic scientists are very surprised finding wolf genetic in us🇹🇷🐺🇦🇿

@buttonastick6521 28 күн бұрын

What? Explain...

@Arkus123 2 күн бұрын

List the study than lol😂😂😂

@koksalceylan9032 9 ай бұрын

Look at thies pictures do they look mogolian or Turkic? The only Turkic is the language nothing the people they are assimilated 7 centuries ago Whit Kurds, Persians, Armenians,Greeks,helleens, Arabs, Georgians, Slavic, Latin peoples

@biran44r 6 ай бұрын

lived in and around mongolia.

@estwenty6847 4 ай бұрын

People from Turkey "No" but Turkic people from central Asia "Jes"

@king0fkings 3 ай бұрын

We, caucasian uzbeks, are not turks and our ancestors didn't migrate from Mongolia. We are descendants of iranian tribes such as sogdians khorezmians and bactrians

@aabb-tq9xb 6 ай бұрын

Perhaps if chinese speak modern Turkish or any other east asian much closer to real turks instead of modern turkish people which originally Armenian and Greek

@patrikstar8466 2 жыл бұрын

ANSWER: NO! They are Turkified native Anatolians, who used to speak Koine Greek up untill 1200s. and much later.

@pattislordu4502 2 жыл бұрын

Haha rage as much as you can :D

@salamyaya162 2 жыл бұрын

@@pattislordu4502 No, he's right.

@Timurid1370 Жыл бұрын

@@salamyaya162 as a turkish he is wrong

@Anadolubozkurtu Жыл бұрын

@@Timurid1370 The truth is painful

@egert1n931 Жыл бұрын

With the mongol invasion most of the turkic tribe were came to anatolia for escape so many different turkic tribes like oghuz, uighur… were met at anatolia btw there was a war called “yassıçemen” made by seljuks and harzemshahs (2 turkic states) for captured anatolia. And before the turks there was not a large population at anatolia that’s why after 1071 the turks entered a huge part of anatolia so easily. And the fırst beyliks period was started. After the fall of sulthanate of Rum. The second beyliks period was started. Until the Anatolian Turkish Political Union is realized at 1515 there were much turkish state at anatolia. And btw turks were made some Raid to anatolia for many times for example: 395 huns, 520 sabars, and the pejeneks. And today specially at the Egean province there is too much “yörük” population.

@almurabitun Жыл бұрын

Did the Turkish people originate from Mongolia? Not all. The Turkmen who migrated from Central Asia (modern day Turkmenistan) originally came from Mongolia previously, yes. The Oghuz Turks of Central Asia that migrated and settled in Anatolia or Turkey as we know it today ruled over and intermarried into local populations of Greeks, Kurds, Slavs, Anatolians, Persians, and Cacuses people's to create the people of Turkey.

@PlayWaves1 Жыл бұрын

Wrong. Turkic IS an ethnicity upon itself originating in modern day Mongolia, most modern Turkic speaking peoples outside of central Asia and Siberia have little original Turkic admixture. Look at Yakut people to see what all Turkic peoples would have looked like before mixing with other peoples. Modern day Turks (from Turkey) are mostly Greek genetically and have little Turkic admixture. All true Turkic genetic admixture originated in Mongolia. Even the first Oghuz turks which were far removed from the original turks, would have looked far more Mongoloid than modern Turkish people.

@jonjonboi3701 Жыл бұрын

There was rarely any mixing between ethnic Turks and Byzantine people

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

@@PlayWaves1 Yakuts are not genetically Turkic either.

@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын

@@PlayWaves1 Original Turks looked like Altai, Chulym and Hakas people not like Yakuts.

@Regalya Жыл бұрын

@@PlayWaves1 Mostly greek ? genetically have little ? Genmap of turkey shows less than 5% greek after milennia of mixing and having greek sex slaves,concubines and wives so wtf are you even talking about ? Turks looked far more mongoloid ? *FALSE* for example todays mongols IN MIDDLE AGES EVEN THE "MONGOL" DIDNT LOOK MONGOLOID. Oh btw "Mongolia" were called Turkistan until 100 years ago and the "Mongols" called Turks/Tatars through their history until 19th century. Let em teach you basic genetics abit ye ; Your genetic make up depends on where you live and whom your ancestors mate with ye? If your ancestors live on a place for long period of time they will integrate some of the genes with the locals but it doesnt eliminate what they were prior regardless how much they mix. The Turks who live in east will have more asiatic features The Turks who live in west will have more cocasian features Due long time mixing that doesnt mean either or but both of them are. The "original turks" were mixed to begin with let me impose this as its important Turks are NOT a race but a mixed ethnic group.

@berat3015 Жыл бұрын

LONG LIVE TURKS 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

@hassankarama9166 2 ай бұрын

منغول 😂😂😂😂

@hassankarama9166 2 ай бұрын

أنت في أصل يوناني أرمني كردي و أصبحت تتحدث بي لغة منغولية و اصبحت تتبنى قومية منغولية

@lifeneverends7068 Ай бұрын

@@hassankarama9166We are not. We are Turkish. You guys are mix of african Arabic jew berberic origin.

@Zorigzori 23 сағат бұрын

GokTurk=Hunu=Mongolia (genetically & culturally)

@marioo849 Жыл бұрын

Turkish people may have been part of the mongolian empire but they are definitely in no connection with modern day mongolian people

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Жыл бұрын

Turkic from Altai Mountain,Mongolia,Siberia,North China

@a4235 Жыл бұрын

Im a turk from Türkiye and my family can be traced back to the nomads from Khingan Mountains

@snakeeater0224 2 жыл бұрын

Turkish was the lengua franca..also Iranian (indo European/pidgin language )in the Silk Road. and Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia are Chinese merchant states or merchants in general (Hindu..Gypsies/indo europeans, Chinese, and arab). Xiongu(kets/Mari/mansi/Komi/utmurds)=Hittite/hunnic/Scythian/yuezhi/cimmerians/ashina turk/chuvash turk. Silk Road had merchants that tried to emulate their rulers.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 2 жыл бұрын

Altai Orkhon is Turkic Victory and Turkic Homeland but Mongol victory and Mongol homeland from North East China in Manchuria

@Willxdiana Жыл бұрын

Yes

@middleeastrenwarriormen1017 Жыл бұрын

@@Willxdiana bruh ! your a Qidan/Khitan ?

@korkufilmleriscarymovies2283 22 күн бұрын

Turks came from Siberia

@Buydaa.M Жыл бұрын

Turkish and Oghuz Turks are not real original Turks aka Ashina Gokturk Oghuz and other tribes fell under umbrella Turkic because of Ashina Gokturk dominion but not considered to be real Turks while being Turkic and Gokturk Turuk subjects

@krimozaki9494 Жыл бұрын

Who are the current descendants of the Ashina clan then ?

@Buydaa.M Жыл бұрын

@@krimozaki9494 Most Gokturks assimilate to Mongolia and Chinese after fall of their empire their subjects whom Oghuz Turks are the real Turkic ancestors of present day Central Asians and Turkey

@Buydaa.M Жыл бұрын

@@krimozaki9494 Russia's Tuva, Khakassia, Altay, Sakha or Yakuts are considered to be closest to Gokturks

@krimozaki9494 Жыл бұрын

@@Buydaa.M possible , since the Gokturks were from ALtai just like Tuva and Khakassia

@Buydaa.M Жыл бұрын

@@krimozaki9494 I think Gokturks was the first to use Turk as a political confederation union that the name spread through Persia n and Arab world but they were probably mixed Saka Iranic and Proto Mongolic people just one type of Turkic people well historians and people like us are still arguing anyways I hope we all come to conclusion

@saintsrow4152 2 жыл бұрын

If turks are mongolian origin, So what matter ?? You people can't insult turks by calling them mongolian.

@aqe7914 2 жыл бұрын

Why are you offended? I am from Turkmenistan and Mongols slaughtered our cities but i am not offended with any of the statements.

@LIFE-zi9ou 11 ай бұрын

The Mongolians/Chinese went as far as America to establish themselves as the natives/first settlers of the continent, so why are people surprised that modern day Turks originated from Mongolia - They literally just moved few steps and breeded with the neighbours.

@tengriaslan2423 7 ай бұрын

@Isowlaite 11 ай бұрын

Turgay is kurdistan

@tongmu5881 2 жыл бұрын

Mongolian grasslands are not suitable for the weak to survive. Many ethnic groups have disappeared from the Mongolian grassland history (some ethnic groups can only choose to flee west after being defeated), and in the end only the Mongolians are left. In fact, modern Turks are not Turkic at all, and Anatolian Turks have only 5.3% of steppe Turkic genes (c3). 92% of Turks are Greeks and Armenians from Anatolia who were conquered by pseudo-Turks (tribes conquered by Turks), as well as "blood tribute" Balkan teenagers.

@sktt1488 2 жыл бұрын

Complete nonsense.. there is No any source claim seljuk turks were %100 mongoloid.. Cope harder racist

@sktt1488 2 жыл бұрын

Who the fuck told you turkic dna is c3??? Even ancient xiongnu had %10 non mongoloid dna.. Scythians didn't disapper and they were not mongolid for sure.

@Toktobay987 2 жыл бұрын

go research turkishdnaproject only central anatolia turks are %35 N(%28-27 turkic %6-7 mongolian)

@S.Yucel1962 2 жыл бұрын

tong mu; You even embarrassed historians, why didn't you show up until now? You'd screw up the history of the world with these empty words.😂😂😂

@jacobjones5294 Жыл бұрын

Yeah thats why Turks were living in there and Mongols were living in a seperate place. You werent fit to lvie there before Genghis Khan

@edmarclavijo3393 2 жыл бұрын

They changed their race.

@RajeevRanjan-uk6bx Жыл бұрын

azarbaizani and turkey people are actually not turks but they are turkified.

@papazataklaattiranimam 11 ай бұрын

@EchoVortex713 3 ай бұрын

Turkish people didn’t originate from Mongolia . Their look more resemble Greek or middle easterners . They only speak Turkic language cuz they were under Turkic rule but genetically they’re different people and have no connection with Gokturk

@lifeneverends7068 Ай бұрын

Very extremely royally wrong

@azarazar3426 28 күн бұрын

There’s no Turkish in turkey..they’re originally Greeks Armenians Arabs and Kurdish .. the origin Turks are Uyghurs

@korkufilmleriscarymovies2283 22 күн бұрын

You are

@nukhetyavuz 7 ай бұрын

very poorly researched and biased

@lactusgalacto1174 8 ай бұрын

Must of the last white Turkish tribes lived in those lands before the Mongols an Chinese arrived and drove must of the whiteTurks out of central Asia like they did with the Germanic tribes. the Mongols conquered the whiteTurks became part and mixed with the mongol horde.

@korkufilmleriscarymovies2283 22 күн бұрын

Mongols got beaten by Sultan Baibars who was also a Turk ,Btw Mongols had Turkic clans inside them like Naimans

@sangumlinggi8330 Ай бұрын

Turks originated from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan below Russia. They only came into relevance after the mongols.

@Schwarzer_pil Жыл бұрын

The Mongols are not Turks, but the Turks may be the remnants of Mongolian semen

@epsilonxvi5675 8 ай бұрын

@@Zurenarrh 🤣😂

@user-qv9em2kt5v 2 жыл бұрын

Wtf

@ashdraked 2 жыл бұрын

Short answer : no Long answer: no

@ashdraked Жыл бұрын

@@Zurenarrh your origins are 80% somewhere else!

@baybarssonmez6799 8 ай бұрын

TURKS ARE THE KING OF THİS WORLD!🤘🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇧🇬🇭🇺🇲🇳

@wayneh1562 Жыл бұрын

ANCIENT ANATOLIAN HITTITES AND MITANNI WERE NOT TURKIC RACE NOT FROM CENTRAL ASIA

@uuuby Жыл бұрын

Turkish from Hittites+Greeks+Central Asia+Iran+Arabic = Turkish

@uuuby Жыл бұрын

Mixed

@uuuby Жыл бұрын

The Turkish language is very similar to Central Asia

@wayneh1562 Жыл бұрын

@@uuuby Hittites were not a central Asian people or race

@uuuby Жыл бұрын

Turkish come from Central Asia originating from the Seljuks and Nomadic Tribes (Turksmenistan🇹🇲) in the 10th century, and mixed with the population of Anatolia controlled by the Byzantines and then conguered by the Seljuks

@mustsphamatto3601 7 ай бұрын

Yes the turks from mongolia and occuppied my land kurdistan

@lifeneverends7068 Ай бұрын

No we did not. Your lands are Zagros mountains and has got nothing to do with Anatolia.

@YOUTUBE_qwertY 2 жыл бұрын

All Turkic peoples are same DNA Mongolians! Only modern Turkish people there are not same because they mixed with persian arab greek russian blood. Original Turkic Mongolian face is like Chinghis Khan face.

@creydcan4175 2 жыл бұрын

Turkish people are mostly Kurdish dude

@jonjonboi3701 2 жыл бұрын

Most Turkish people aren’t mixed with Arab. Very few Turkish people are mixed with Arab. Majority of it is mixed with Balkan Europeans like Albanian, Bosnian, Serbian and Bulgarian, with Greek and and Anatolian with Armenian, Georgian and Persian.

@jonjonboi3701 2 жыл бұрын

Turkish people rarely look middle eastern. Most of them tend to look European like Southern European looking

@YOUTUBE_qwertY 2 жыл бұрын

@@jonjonboi3701 No sorry brother! Modern Turkish people looks more middle east that’s meanining western Asian. Thats arab iranian all the countiers you named!

@uuuby Жыл бұрын

Mongolian Not Turkic

@creydcan4175 2 жыл бұрын

Turkish people Kurdish as Kurdish I know I don't look like Chinese Turkish people miks Greek Kurdish Armenian there is no Turkish in turkey I don't know why they call Turkey

@meralkeskin8511 Жыл бұрын

Kurd? 🤣 🤣 Its came to Anatolia before 500 years.. Hittite, lur, greek, ermenian, turj are mixed : Turkey borned..Hitte dna is dominant not greek