I am surprised how you have so less subscribers, your way of teaching is so intuitive and easy to understand... Hope the algorithm finds you mate 😃
@dnayi204 жыл бұрын
Great video! Appreciated the use of first principles to explain differentiation
@okonol Жыл бұрын
This is the best explanatory video on the subject yet. I'll have to save this one.
@lee-bv4tw Жыл бұрын
this is the only video that explains so concisely in a way i can understand, awesome video. every other explanation regarding this topic explains like they're recapping it but you actually EXPLAIN it
@khalidmahmood1776 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir. I am impressed. I am trying to learn math on my own time. This has been one of the best videos. Thank you very much, Sir.
@eugenemasoniv86412 жыл бұрын
This! This right here is an amazing video explaining differentiation. The best one in my opinion. Thank you so much for this. I finally understand!
@DiLLZGFX4 жыл бұрын
This is the best video on KZbin rn ! Great video man ! Keep it up
@AdhithyaKrishna-bv6pk Жыл бұрын
wow , I asked what is derivative to every teachers , their explanations is not worthy . But this 20 Minutes make me under stand what is this . THANK YOU
@sziartopeter89432 жыл бұрын
your videos are gold! i think i found a new favorite math channel
@navneetkaur24454 жыл бұрын
I was struggling with a level maths as well 😂thanks for this
@krishshah22094 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you much, I've been struggling with Differentiation!
@rajadipsingh4 жыл бұрын
Really helpful video
@denad9114 жыл бұрын
that was really well explained! thanks for the video :)
@sukhibhamra57504 жыл бұрын
Really amazing and really helpful thank you so much 😊
@aleenavirdee56564 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Thanks so much for posting! 😃 Finally understand why you bring down the power and minus one from the power 😅
@karimjanmohamed38354 жыл бұрын
This is awesome! Really appreciate this insight
@sukhibhamra57504 жыл бұрын
I really like your voice as well 😘
@no-lifenoah78612 жыл бұрын
This is a great series!
@Jacob-qx4bc Жыл бұрын
7:02 wouldnt the visualization for this be the purple point going in a straight line towards the green point?
@amanjagdev55474 жыл бұрын
Great video, looking forward to more
@miteshkiran5288 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the content!
@sable.studio18 күн бұрын
Where and why does it change from focusing on two points and making them closer and closer to calculating the derivative of any function? I want to know how they connect
@quigonkenny Жыл бұрын
I love Gottfried Liebnitz. His guitar playing for Queen was amazing...
@glasceur2 жыл бұрын
you deserve more subscribers.
@ThinAirElon Жыл бұрын
what software did you use for explanations ?
@nikkibhamra75364 жыл бұрын
Absolutely awesome 👍🏼
@Dinesh123lol4 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Was so helpful to learn it from first principle 🔥
@jsingh69314 жыл бұрын
Awesome video thank you
@mahmoudelnaggar8512 Жыл бұрын
Awesome, thank you!
@jere35582 жыл бұрын
This is very well explained!
@3DCadDesignCombo2 жыл бұрын
Great video. However, may I ask this, where is the h2 go in the equation (2xh + h2)/h as it turns to be 2x + h.. thank to anyone who can explain.
@flybug123 Жыл бұрын
You’ve probably figured it by now, but you can factorize the h in 2xh+h^2, making it h(2x+h)/h , then you can cancel the h resulting in 2x+h
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
@@flybug123WHAT IS THE SUN has to exist in SPACE AND TIME. Think. (Consider what is outer “space” ON BALANCE.) Great. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !! Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE !! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. This proves the fourth dimension, AND this solves the coronal heating “problem”. Great. Regarding WHAT IS E=MC2, c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great. What is gravity is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Notice what is the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE !!!! A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. ON BALANCE, I have CLEARLY proven and explained what is the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution !!!!!! Magnificent. The curvature or shape of WHAT IS THE MOON DOES matches that of what is THE EARTH/ground. The maria DO occupy ONE THIRD of the near side of WHAT IS THE MOON. THE DENSITY OF water to lava IS ONE THIRD. NOTICE THE ORANGE SUN AND THE TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE SKY ON BALANCE !! I'M A GENIUS. I HAVE TRULY REVOLUTIONIZED PHYSICS. ONE HALF MULTIPLIED TIMES ONE THIRD IS ONE SIXTH !!!! ONE QUARTER TIMES TWO THIRDS IS ONE SIXTH. Great. ONE HALF MULTIPLIED TIMES ONE HALF IS ONE QUARTER. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the bulk density of WHAT IS THE SUN IS ONE QUARTER in what then constitutes DIRECT comparison WITH WHAT IS THE EARTH. Notice what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE. It IS the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. MAGNIFICENT. THEREFORE, ON BALANCE, the LAND surface area of WHAT IS THE EARTH IS EXACTLY BETWEEN ONE THIRD AND ONE QUARTER. ABSOLUTELY MAGNIFICENT. ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the crust of WHAT IS THE MOON IS TWICE AS thick in what constitutes DIRECT comparison WITH that of what is the near side. (Think LAVA.) Consider what is the ORANGE SUN. Great. It IS the same size as WHAT IS THE EYE. NOTICE, ON BALANCE, what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky, AS WHAT IS THE EARTH IS ALSO BLUE. ABSOLUTELY MAGNIFICENT. Note: The bulk density of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of what are (volcanic) basaltic LAVAs ON THE EARTH. The diameter of WHAT IS the Moon IS about ONE QUARTER of that of what is THE EARTH. I have surpassed Newton and Einstein. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@Hashirama_Sinju Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@hzlin30052 жыл бұрын
amazing explanation!!
@kklol072 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@amitsrivastava19343 жыл бұрын
Excellent !!
@centralcityacademy3 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@MeiziVu3 ай бұрын
love you!!!!
@cuterancesama628 Жыл бұрын
Why are lim x+h tends to x same as lim h tends to 0 same?
@김은영-d7j2 жыл бұрын
BEST OF BEST
@KhalidMahmood-s5c Жыл бұрын
very good
@sarathexelixir6801 Жыл бұрын
Thats calculus basics in 18. 23 seconds 👍😍
@waffleisnice Жыл бұрын
5:15
@philippelhaus2 жыл бұрын
Great
@waffleisnice Жыл бұрын
6:24
@crabkerenchannel27695 ай бұрын
Mantap lah
@ljp7778 Жыл бұрын
11:33
@agautam520811 ай бұрын
Delta y and dy is different....... Delta x and dx remain same.... When limit is taken then delta y becomes equal to dy dy&dx is geometric notation [nomenclature (name)] ..........delta y /delta x is secant slope not tangent slope Secant slope becomes equal to tangent slope when delta x approaches zero using limit technic....dy/dx is ratio like factor.it is not dy÷dx.but operation of this notation does not make difference.Each and everytime we convert average rate of change to instantaneous rate of change using limit technic 😊🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@alaechoulli61112 жыл бұрын
You a goo’uh guy
@hassanrahimi60082 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍🖐🖐🖐
@shreyasbajoria2994 Жыл бұрын
I discovered this channel today and I like it's video but I just realised that it's already dead.
@johandsilentio Жыл бұрын
Why is he saying "haitch" for "h"👎? It's "aitch"
@sebastianbalbo1906 Жыл бұрын
why lying about history..the concept is from INDIA .. ARYABATTHA BASKARACHARYA MANJULA BRAHMAGUPTA MADHAVA..
@supernovic99 Жыл бұрын
No one's lying about history and Newton and Leibniz were the ones who invented Calculus even though there were brilliant discoveries from India. Why does it even matter. The video is about differentiation, not the history of Calculus
@aryansingh72092 жыл бұрын
Underrated video
@shanksharma51177 ай бұрын
research found that lebnitz stealed madhvacharya series and named it lebnitz theorem. it is quite possible that differentiation may has been stealed from ancient indian textbooks. so we know that Newton laws are already mentioned in the ancient textbook of India. What should we conclude then?