Dinosaurs Lived MUCH More Recently than People Think

Dinosaurs lived MUCH more recently than most people think. In this episode of The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark, Calvin Smith shares why the evolutionary timeline for dinosaurs is completely inaccurate.
This is an episode of our series, The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark. You can watch the other episodes of the series here: www.Answers.tv/the-genesis-ac...

[@strategywizard]

Thanks, Calvin. I really appreciate your videos. I know there are always people in the comments calling you a liar and everything else under the sun, but I thank you for your perseverance. It will always amaze me how evolutionists have so much faith in their theory that they can believe that animal instincts evolved so perfectly. For example, what came first, baby sea turtles knowing to head for the ocean after hatching, or the instinct of the mother to lay the eggs on the beach? The ability to lay eggs desired by predators as food, or the ability to make marvelously made nests with their little bird claws? And it just so happens that the general ecosystems have managed to survive with the right amount of predators to prey? It just boggles the mind to believe that mutations and natural selection just happened to get things right so consistently across the board such that things work so harmoniously.

[@nathancook2852]

The mental gymnastics you all must do is astounding. People believe in evolution due to the overwhelming about of evidence supporting it. I don't know the answer to your trap questions, and I don't want to research them right now, but I can ask trap questions of my own. If everything is so perfectly designed by a creator, why do we have wisdom teeth, tonsils, and an appendix (just to name a few)? Why do we grow a tail in utero, only for it to be reabsorbed and the material repurposed before birth (some people are still born with said tail). Why do our airway and throat share the same pathway? Why is our knee joint not a ball and socket? Why is the recurrent laryngeal nerve so weirdly routed? Why are the male reproductive organs unprotected? And these are just a few non-perfect aspects of human anatomy.

[@strategywizard]

@nathancook2852 Tonsils and the appendix are part of the immune system. But pointing out imperfections does not contradict the Bible. It just reinforces that the world is cursed due to sin. Things were perfect originally, but we live in an imperfect, fallen, cursed world now.

[@TylerDaleHood]

@@nathancook2852your response is awesome, but not for the reason you think it is. Why do you trust your brain that wasn’t designed?

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

​@@nathancook2852, about the wisdom tooth, it's role is to grind plants if you are old, remove the if you wanted to, tonsils role is to be the immune system outpost in your mouth, if you want a Tetanus to enter your body easily, then I accepted that, Appendix role is unknown until we found out it's roles to digest cellulose, so remove them if you wanted to.

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

​ The person brain is monkey brain, Evolution has an answer to that.

[@heels-villeshoerepairs8613]

Amazing how selective the asteroid was!!! 😂😂😂😂

[@zerosteel0123]

😂😂😂 yeah

[@halodude4481]

lol if there was an asteroid and it wiped all the dinos out why didnt it take all the other animals out as well?

[@heels-villeshoerepairs8613]

@@halodude4481 finally, someone who gets it.

[@mrdoginabog5499]

The asteroid is only one of many possible exinction events, however yes, it would be strange if the impact of an asteroid had some type of selective preference for killing off species. This is, until you realize that it likely wasn't the impact of the asteroid that killed off most life. Of course, the initial touchdown would've been especially lethal for those within range of it's effective shockwave, but would've likely left most things beyond it relatively alright. So you may be wondering why this could've caused an exinction event yeah, that leading theory is actually quite simple, climate change. The impact of a exinction class asteroid would've had catastrophic effects on plantlife, namely the reduction of photosynthesis due to a large amount of sunlight being blocked by the changes in cloud cover. This in turn, would've drastically reduced the population of primary consumers which would result in secondary and tertiary consumers either preying on each other, or nearly wiping out the already devasted herbivorous population. All of these processes would've created an ecological collapse on levels we would classify as a mass exinction. Y'know what would maybe survive though? Mammals. Small, or medium sized mammals and other animal groups that wouldn't require the large amount of resources and habitat larger animal groups need to survive. This process, continuing on for a very long time, would've potentially produced many of the ecological niches and ecosystems we see in more modern times. Of course, I could be wrong as well as anyone else in the scientific community, but you should always keep your mind open to other possibilities instead of just saying it's nonsense and dismissing it.

[@FieryRed_BE]

@@halodude4481 imagine if animals were small enough to hide, unthinkable is it?

[@runwillrobinson]

I can't wait for the rest of the story in the upcoming episode!

[@larrybedouin2921]

Great presentation.Thank you.

[@chrisclark7170]

If you like being lied to. Creationism is a fairytale not science.

[@larrybedouin2921]

@@chrisclark7170 Grow up a learn something.

[@IronSharpensIron127]

​@@chrisclark7170 nothing created everything is scientific?

[@Sawyersmaple]

Thank you for sharing this. Love the sound logic, reasoning and facts.

[@zeldafansonly7484]

literally not a single fact was stated hahaha

[@chrisclark7170]

It's all a lie, not a single fact provided.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

Not a single credible source either

[@RestoredRandom]

There was no logic and reasoning based on facts. So you didn't love any of it?

[@ml9760]

Wouldn't it be fun to find out that dinosaurs were as gentle as your dog and hung out in yard looking fir treats? 😂❤

[@truthbebold4009]

I've seen a video of a full sized T Rex playing fetch. It was unbelievable 😮

[@surrenderdaily333]

They were. Daydream to your heart's content.

[@MRBRADART]

They will be when we get to Heaven!😊🙏🏻

[@AndemusRay]

I would say, God's design of the dinosaurs were not what we found everywhere in the fossil. Remember, when Adam and Eve sinned, the whole creation was affected, so I would say mutations began rapidly change creatures to the diet and constant instincts. Do you think God just judge the world with the flood just for the human perversion? He started over, getting rid of what He knew was not good for a new start with Noah.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

@@AndemusRayif only he had gotten it right the first time.

[@christopherskipp1525]

The fossil record undermines your claim that "modern" animals existed with dinosaurs.

[@johnglad5]

There is no fossil record. The Colecanth disproves this idea. Just because it wasn't found in a strata does not mean it wasn't alive during that time. 65 millions years of time in the so called record and no Colecanth's are found.

[@brunobastos5533]

they found a way to deny that

[@johnglad5]

Human footprints with dinosaur footprints prove they lived at the same time.

[@brunobastos5533]

@@johnglad5 try to back up your claims

[@skipsmith9692]

Awesome, thanks for this. Love it.

[@robertcarr7943]

Alligators love to eat watermelon and cantaloupe.

[@JungleJargon]

I don’t know how people can deny the entire earth was covered with water leaving multiple mega sequences of water deposited sediment layers with samples of the animals that were living at the time.

[@JungleJargon]

@@bullwinklejmoos How many of the original ancient civilizations can you name?

[@bullwinklejmoos]

@@JungleJargon Chinese come to mind.

[@JungleJargon]

@@bullwinklejmoos Which Chinese? The Sino descendants or the descendants of Magog? They have a flood narrative in their pictograms anyway.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

@@JungleJargon Aren’t you kind of answering your own question when you start with the premise “the entire earth was covered with water,” but your evidence is that there are “multiple mega sequences of water deposited sediment layers.” If the entire earth was covered with water then you should find evidence anywhere/everywhere on earth. I should be able to go into my backyard no matter where I live and find evidence of the flood if I dig deep enough (assuming the flood functioned as creationists say it did). Using only your premise and evidence, I do not see how someone could conclude that a worldwide flood better explains “multiple mega sequences of water deposited sediment layers” than multiple separate regional floods would.

[@JungleJargon]

@@Shoerandomcanoe Geology is all the result of the global flood. It consists of mega sequences of water deposited sediment layers with the actual remains of the animals that were living at the time.

[@chaikaomoua1169]

If dinosaurs and mammals of today did live together it ruins the extinction story and the evolution theory.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

Nope, most of the mammals on earth with the dinosaurs died from the same extinction event. The few that didn’t evolved over the next few million years into the mammals we see today.

[@chaikaomoua1169]

@@Shoerandomcanoe so what allowed some animals to survive the extinction and others to die off? Wouldn't it make more sense if all animals died because of the extinction?

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

@@chaikaomoua1169The accepted hypothesis is that an asteroid impact caused a chain of events that caused about 75% of species on earth to go extinct. After the impact the effects include, wildfires, tsunamis, massive amounts of dust being ejected into the atmosphere, and volcanic eruptions. The dust blocked out so much sunlight that global temperatures dropped and plant life plummeted as you might expect when there is no sun. This meant the end for the large cold blooded reptiles, large mammals etc. Crocodiles were only able to survive because they had some shelter in the water and have the ability to kind of hibernate and thus survive extended periods with little to no food. Small mammals that could borough, were nocturnal, and had diverse diets were able to survive. Birds who ate mostly seeds were also able to survive. So the short answer is there were some animals with some characteristics that allowed them to survive this catastrophe. And with most things dead there was hardly any competition for the surviving animals.

[@chaikaomoua1169]

@@Shoerandomcanoe that is the accepted story but are we to assume all the animals today evolved from some kind of burrowing or aquatic animals? Like a mole evolve to an elephant?

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@Shoerandomcanoe Nice story, now prove it. Because we have huge mammals on earth now, where did they come from? How do you explain the stoeckle and Thaler mitochondrial DNA study?

[@greenguitarfish]

So helpful ! I just shared this on a typical evolution preaching channel as I was having a discussion with an annoyed and dismissive evolutionist, and I will also share it with an evolutionary content creator who I was chatting with. Thanks again Calvin and whoever else is helping with the great graphics !

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

Dont share this ffs. there are no sources its not credible you will just embarrass yourself

[@greenguitarfish]

@@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh Well, what information was shared that you find not credible ?

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

@@greenguitarfish Almost everything... Cherry picking information like this to prove a point is very shady

[@greenguitarfish]

@@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh Can you be more specific. Can you name one bit of information in this presentation that you believe is untrue ?

[@shadowm2k7]

Thank you, Calvin!! Love you & your work!!! Give your editors love from me too! The music & sound effects are really nice!

[@oldtestament7854]

I love archeology and reading up on older books and what they say on various matters. Marco Polo describes in his book called Travels a huge 2 legged creature that resembled what we would call a dinosaur. Archeology findings show numerous artifacts that depict dinosaurs, one that looks just like a stegasaurs. The term dinosaur was termed by Richard Owen in 1842. Before that, dinosaurs were called dragons. China has many drawings in there ancient times that depicts creatures that remarkably resembles dinosaurs

[@YophiSmith]

12:00 Okay, you got Sharp Tooth and Long Neck right, but the triceratops is called “Three horn,” not “Spike Nose.” If you know, you know 😂

[@maximinotovar5798]

Awesome! Thanks for posting

[@redfaux74]

I didn't know this channel existed. Subbed..... ❤

[@davidmundy2906]

I'm thinking most of the animals were young so they could be brought to the ark

[@Nils-gi5bv]

And where did the animals and plants from the continents that had not yet been discovered come from?

[@nickroberts-xf7oq]

​@Nils-gi5bv "Not yet been discovered..." ....by humans.....the animals didn't need humans to make their discovery. 😉

[@johnthompson1437]

an excellent and logical video! thank you!

[@JiraiyaSama86]

Stole my line lol

[@7R4dicalized]

It was anything but logical.

[@johnthompson1437]

@@7R4dicalized you poor thing you!

[@7R4dicalized]

⁠@@johnthompson1437Why? As a Christian the Bible is the word; Noah bringing pairs of all animals to repopulate, considering the logistics and practicality, it is totally illogical. How was he able to collect endemic animals on the other side of the world. And the sea life?? ** Now it can be illogical and accurate at the same time.

[@hogansheroes2793]

​@@7R4dicalizedNoah didn't collect anything. God sent the animals to Noah. Sea life didn't need the ark.

[@forestgiest1380]

10:30 No. They didn't put it into that taxon because of it's morphology.

[@libbydaddy8610]

😢5:45 & 6:24 Mammals reptiles & amphibians. 😊 Really sharp presentation, guys, and very informative.

[@Bomtombadi1]

If you’re looking for a real education, then yes, very informative on what not to be taught.

[@karenzak6627]

Thanks for another informative, thought provoking and God honoring presentation!

[@v1e1r1g1e1]

Major problems with people accepting that dinosaurs were on the Ark: 1. Pictures of the Ark with animals entering always show ADULT animals. It was much more likely that only juveniles were taken. 2. Most people think ''dinosaur''; they think ''huge''.

[@TEENFORMER]

More likely nothing there is absolutely no reason to take the adults. Juveniles make so much more sense in every way (especially if they're going to have to repopulate the world) 😅

[@greenguitarfish]

The largest dinosaur egg ever discovered was only 6”x 18”. So, they all started out small. It’s only logical God would have brought young ones to The Ark.

[@pr0ject_nihilist]

That a great point Cal. How come there are no mammals found in the fossils record together with dinosaurs?

[@walkergarya]

1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018

[@RomyCats]

Most of these questions have been dealt with by video and articles published by Answers in Genesis and other organizations. Also there is a great documentary called "The Ark and the Darkness" which also address many questions. Very professionally put together. I highly recommend it.

[@walkergarya]

@@RomyCats Lies from AiG donot answer these questions.

[@KrisMaertens]

​@@walkergaryadon't ask difficult questions,I want to keep believing my fairytale...

[@walkergarya]

@@KrisMaertens I do not believe in fairy tales, I accept science.

[@ab.5650]

🦖 💚

[@ShaneEstabrooks]

I think that since seasons didn't start till after the flood, and human life span after the flood is about 120 years old instead of 900 from before, most dinosaurs wouldn't be able to live on earth post flood.

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

They can, but humans has something to do with this.

[@clayton4349]

@@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6joAfter all, why else would there be so many hero slaying dragon stories all around the globe?

[@halodude4481]

@@clayton4349 yes! they might have been hunted for sport as well bc if u saw a dino running at you first thing you would think at the time is that it was a dragon.

[@nickma71]

This series of videos is making me think they picked up Dr Walt Brown's book on They Hydroplate Theory.

[@KrisMaertens]

How long did the lion had to wait until he could eat his prey again after his boat trip of 40 days? Until they reproduced?

[@mrsmith4662]

An 'inconvenient truth' which the advocates of the accepted orthodoxy cannot stomach.

[@jimmiewomble416]

I recently found a T-Rex skeleton buried right next to a human skeleton in my back yard! That proves beyond a doubt humans and dinosaurs lived together! Read all about it in my book, "Making lots of money off of creationist mythology"!

[@Torby4096]

13:53 easy to understand why we don't find human remains among the animals. On the 6th day, God created a world full of animals and 2 humans. 1600 years later, the ratio of people to possoms would be very near zero.

[@statutesofthelord]

Very true.

[@RestoredRandom]

So modern birds are a created kind? Anything to support that? Birds are not modern day dinosaurs or what's left of them?

[@TickedOffPriest]

Most of the dinosaurs were actually quite small.

[@Elijahtheprophet-ss8ou]

I know that a flood or tsunami cases people to grab onto what ever floats so the dinosaur tracks and human tracks that are all over the Colorado Plato would have gotten there because they were on what is called the petrified forest a 2000 square mile floating debris pile and when the Colorado Plato rose those creatures would be able to get off and wander around until the next volcanic event covers them and nothing on land or in the air survived??

[@Nickleotide]

Looking forward to the publication...

[@nickroberts-xf7oq]

KJV 1611 📖 ✔️ 👀

[@Nickleotide]

In a scientific journal 😉

[@nickroberts-xf7oq]

@Nickleotide Oh, the same science that says everything exploded out of nothing millions and billions of years ago ?And that the covid shot was a vaccine ? 😆 I'll pass......

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@Nickleotide Are mammal fossils found in the same layers as dinosaur fossils? If so, that fact has already been published. It's the interpretation that matters.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***birds are the modern dinos.***

[@rickramdon6927]

I believe in what you are saying 🐅🦖🦕.

[@thesavior2398]

Ya Love to see it

[@brandonnorris7403]

I think before the flood there was a good possibility where mankind Walked with some dinosaurs that remained from a prehistoric time thay just did not call them dinosaurs but had different names for them like the word behemoth, there was ancient words used long ago describing things that we used today for instance when you hear the word ferment that's describing the atmosphere

[@alantasman8273]

Behemoth was in Chapter 40 of the Book of Job...which took placed post flood...meaning a dinosaur descendant of a creature on the Ark.

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@alantasman8273the same behemoth which shares a description similar to that of a hippo?

[@pierre-samuelroux9364]

Yes because birds

[@mrb.8389]

If all life existed simultaneously at the time of Noah’s global flood as claimed, why aren’t there remains of all “kinds” of life (even for a short time) after Noah’s flood (only recent “kinds”)??? Why do we only discover remains of certain “kinds” in certain layers (sedimentary, volcanic, meteroic layers etc), not all mixed together if they died in the same flood??? Why is there no remains of all “kinds” of life (and their foods) from distant islands and continents around where Noah’s ark settled - or anywhere in between there and their sole known origin/current location??? Why do plants and animals (not qualifying as ark creatures or their foods) exist past and present if all destroyed by god in the flood??? If Noah’s ark only held a single mating “kind” of each creature, doesn’t that suggest rapid evolution to produce the variants of “kinds” we see today??? How did the different “kinds” of life from across the world (and from places then unknown) get to the ark, and return to their sole known locations after???… Noting many cannot travel far or fast, cannot swim from or back to their respective islands and continents, require different environments, require different foods (thereby requiring plants and other foods that cannot move themselves to the ark and back again) etc etc etc

[@lamar3697]

They was because there were no deaths till Adam sinned so after they did animals started eating each other

[@blank-964]

Seems fairly obvious some fur and feather covered (more modern looking) animals would settle out at higher levels.

[@AmericanActionReport]

Let's apply some common sense here. Of all the extinctions that came about during historical times, which species became extinct all of a sudden, and with no exceptions? Probably none. Even in mass extinction events, it's reasonable to assume that some members of species continued to live until the species completely died out. Is it unreasonable to wonder if some dinosaurs existed in biblical times before completely dying out? Also, if evolution is real, did mammals appear all of a sudden? No, they came about over time. So why are we taught that there was an impenetrable wall of separation between the Age of Dinosaurs and the Age of Mammals?

[@davidgardner863]

Whoever told you there was an impenetrable wall between between dinosaurs and mammals didn’t know what he was talking about.

[@AmericanActionReport]

@@davidgardner863 You're partly correct. Whoever wittingly or unwittingly implied an "impenetrable wall between dinosaurs and mammals didn't know what he was talking about." In high school and college science classes, at least until recently, students were taught that mammals didn't exist at the same time as dinosaurs. If that had been true (which science now admits it isn't true), then the last dinosaur (assuming they are now completely extinct) would have died out before the first mammal. Thus, there would have been an abrupt shift between the Age of Dinosaurs (and No Mammals) and the Age of Mammals (and no Dinosaurs) with no overlap between the two presumed ages.

[@KrisKeyes]

Christian: “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it’s a duck.” Atheist: “sOUrcE?!!”

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

Joke?

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

Ducks and Chickens weight about more than 50 kilos, so they die then because there is no land animals survive in mass extinctions who's weight is 50+kilos.

[@Ace7-xc2rr]

technically the truth, since birds are literally dinosaurs

[@lovesickforone]

So basically every kind of animal has been found buried in the same sedimentary layers as the different kinds of dinosaurs? Yet, they still won't believe the Bible? Kinda demonstrates that "believe" is an action verb... and thus a choice. I'll keep choosing to believe God.

[@DrJoelDuff]

You would get that impression watching this video but that is certainly not true. Smith is not presenting the whole picture. Yes, there are some mammals found with dinosaurs but very few you would recognize and the vast majority of mammal groups (cats, dogs, bear, rodents, primates, whales, and on and on and on) have not had one single fossil found in any rocks that contain dinosaurs.

[@charlesharn4460]

⁠@@DrJoelDuffThe neobara chalk contains a collection of dinosaurs, birds, fish, and mammals. This proves that these creatures all lived in a similar timeframe. Not millions of years apart. Hope this helps.

[@davidgardner863]

⁠@@charlesharn4460, Fish came long before dinosaurs. Nobody disputes that, but no modern mammals or birds. The mammals were small and some survived the dinosaur extinction 66 million years ago.

[@charlesharn4460]

@@davidgardner863 what you are referring to is simply a belief. Fish did not come before dinosaurs. And dinosaurs did not come before birds. The chalk layer is supposed to be 80 millions years old yet it contains fauna ranging from crinoids, sea turtles, lobe fishes, dinosaurs, mammals and birds. Some of these animals weren’t supposed to evolve until 30 or 50 millions years ago. And some are supposed to be over 450 million years old. It’s ridiculous. Nothing evolved into anything.

[@charlesharn4460]

@@davidgardner863 and secondly how would gradual grain by grain deposition on the ocean floor over millions of years bury together such a wide array of large sea, land, and air creatures?

[@davidguerra2966]

no cap

[@ftk-forthekingdomministrie7439]

"Never Say Dinosaur" 😅

[@That_OneGuy46]

Of course, I'll trust the biblical anecdotes over the physical scientific facts, why wouldn't I?

[@thedubwhisperer2157]

I truly hope this is a joke...

[@KrisMaertens]

Yes,same,I trust a book written hundreds of years ago,full of contradictions... Not the recent scientific papers who support evolution. I'm still searching for that 1 scientific paper that disproves evolution,just can't find it...

[@AdamosDad]

I believe the Bible, because Truth gives me faith.

[@user-br6px6ok9x]

What????

[@AdamosDad]

@@user-br6px6ok9x My way of saying faith comes from God, "…16But not all of them welcomed the good news. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed our message?” 17Consequently, faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ. 18But I ask, did they not hear? Indeed they did: “Their voice has gone out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world.”…

[@thedubwhisperer2157]

@@AdamosDad Why do you believe in the God of the Bible and not Allah of the Quran? Is it the predominant religion in your country of birth, or your parents' religion?

[@AdamosDad]

@@thedubwhisperer2157 The USA was founded mostly by Christians, but in the last several decades there has been a movement away from our foundations. My parents were not Christians, and I grew up that way. My dad was an alcoholic, so I took that path also getting fairly heavy into drugs. I was exposed to Christianity and Islam in my travels in North Africa, Turkey and Yugoslavia. One day in my miserable existence, I asked God if He was real and if he was, please speak to me. He did and I was totally delivered from all my addictions and felt clean for the first time in my life. This was all outside any Church.

[@atimetokeep1136]

The children of the devil always try to suppress the truth. The truth cannot be hidden however.

[@rolandixor]

I'm a YEC, but I find it highly off-putting when groups of mammals and other animals that are not represented today are represented as modern forms. This opens the door to creationists being accused of lying, because... it's not honest. Repenomamus is not a badger. It's a gobiconodontid. Why can't we just be honest and say that yes, these are mammals, or in the case of duck-like birds, relatives of ducks. They're evidence that God created way more diversity, and we're responsible for losing this diversity. It's a sobering reminder of the consequences of our sin. So, I have to agree - it's a bad look for us when we misrepresent the facts like this.

[@mrdoginabog5499]

Bruv I'm ngl, I just don't understand. If all of these fossils we find died in the flood then where are the human fossils. Surely we'd find at least one or quite a few if God swept the entire earth in flood waters and that's how we get fossils.

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

Atheist: We know the universe age is 14,000,000,000 yrs old, why you believe in your book. Christian:When God created Adam, he created him as an adult even if Adam age is one day, so when God created the universe, he make sure the universe is mature enough to carry the order of cosmos, not expanding to much and not squeezing to much, so, God is like an artist, he didn't paint a tree from start to the seed and the sapling, but he draw an mature tree.

[@Dee-nonamnamrson8718]

You don't even need to say that. God is extra-temporal. He can make millions of years happen in 1 day.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

We know that because someone made a falsifiable hypothesis about the early universe. Then years later different people collected data that corroborated that theory. Compare that to a book that is “known” to be true because it says it is true and tell me which you think is more objective.

[@Shoerandomcanoe]

@@Dee-nonamnamrson8718or…a lot of small changes eventually lead to big changes if given enough time.

[@Dee-nonamnamrson8718]

@Shoerandomcanoe I'm not sure what you're arguing? My point is that time isn't an issue for an extra-temporal being. Evolution can take millions of years, and still be made to happen in 1 day if the creator is outside of time.

[@frankstallon7679]

The earth has been hit more than once. And some of those hits absolutely would cause a mass extinction event.

[@alantasman8273]

False..the fact we are still here says otherwise.

[@frankstallon7679]

@@alantasman8273 Those hits predate us humans. This planet had several of these events. Mass extinction, not absolute extinction of all life.

[@alantasman8273]

@@frankstallon7679 Actually there are some 450+ mammals that have been found with dinosaur bones and they look identical in appearance to their modern day cousins. Why did they survive and the dinosaurs couldn't? One more thing...why has soft dinosaur tissue now been found at dig sites on five continents ....tissue that includes blood vessels, blood cells, collagen and even partial DNA. How could this tissue survive for 65+ million years? And why are there petraglyphs, etchings even sculptures depicting anatomically correct dinosaurs found around the world?

[@mimemouse997]

53 million year old rabbit 🐰… No, that can’t be!!

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

That can be, its not far fetched even for evolution

[@mimemouse997]

@@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh 🐰🐰🐰

[@vaderenseun]

Excellent motivational video! It is time that the big bang historians accept that creation did not occurred in 24 hour cycles incorrectly assumed when reading Geneses account in the Bible. Best regards.

[@Phillip-up3ip]

All about MONEY 🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂😢😢😢😮😮😮

[@veselinbenev]

The ordinary name of dinosaurs is a dragon, mentioned in the Holy Bible many times.

[@walkergarya]

Non-avian dinosaurs dwere wiped out 66 million years ago.

[@scott76252]

Why was Noah instructed to bring 7 pares of clean animals if he and his family were vegan vegetarians?

[@user-dq4ir2vw8w]

He understood that the clean would be used for sacrifices, as well as for food , since it would take a while for the vegetation to grow back

[@scott76252]

@@user-dq4ir2vw8w where is that in the Bible

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

The extra "Clean" animals were used as sacrifices and God then allowed humans to eat meat after the flood. Noah did not know what his God had in store & just obeyed him. The extra animals would have provided food that would have been needed right after the flood for his family. The animals would have bred quickly and then the vegetation would have provided food as well. We are grateful that Noah,our forefather, obeyed his God and did just as he was directed. Trust in God is the key,even when you may not understand why he is asking you to do or not do something. His knowledge & wisdom is far superior to ours. Imagine if Noah decided that it was ridiculous what God was asking him to do & made his own decisions about how many animals to take, or took shortcuts with waterproofing the ark. We must have complete trust in Gods requirements and acknowledge his right to direct our steps.

[@thedubwhisperer2157]

@@joeythebushkangaroo1 Can you refer us to the passage in the bible which says this, or is this simply your opinion/interpretation?

[@crabb9966]

​@@thedubwhisperer2157 have you read the Bible? I don't understand the point

[@Aaron-pv3qq]

I know, dinosaurs are still alive. But only the therapod variety. You see them everywhere we call them birds.

[@alantasman8273]

Funny how birds co-existed with dinosaurs, yet you say dinosaurs became birds...circular reasoning.

[@Aaron-pv3qq]

​@alantasman8273 it's not funny, birds are living fossils and dinosaurs had feathers, one things they do not find is humans in fossil beds with dinosaurs .

[@alantasman8273]

@@Aaron-pv3qq Why would humans want to hang around with dinosaurs? Think about it. Do we find human bones with lion bones...or do they try to stay away from each other. During the Noah flood humans would have headed for higher ground., They would have held on to the floating debris that would have been everywhere. There bodies would also have floated, bloated and become fish bait.

[@Aaron-pv3qq]

@@alantasman8273 well they would be found in same strata if they lived in the same time frame .

[@alantasman8273]

@@Aaron-pv3qq Why...did they hang out together or was man smarter and avoided them. Fossils were formed quickly as the flood sediments poured upon the fleeing animals including dinosaurs. The hell creek formation in Montana includes ens of thousands of fossilized (soft tissue) dinosaurs in death poses as the reached the end of the line together and the flood waters and sediment covered them. Man being more intelligent would have found ways to stay afloat eventually dying and floating in the water until there bones were picked clean. They most likely would not have been buried like other animals.

[@raymondvanroest372]

Hmm where are the Australian animals in this story as they weren't in Iraq?

[@alantasman8273]

The post flood ice age drew down ocean waters and left land bridges all over the world that allowed animals to spread far and wide. The Bering Strait land bridge is just one example.

[@raymondvanroest372]

@@alantasman8273 no skeletal remains of Australian animals anywhere in Africa or the middle east!

[@alantasman8273]

@@raymondvanroest372 Do some research and you will find that kangaroo fossils have been found at other locations other than Australia. Because a species no longer exists in an area does not mean it had never previously inhabited the area. For example when Cortez came to the New World...the found no horses there despite the fossil record later discovering that horses had previously been on that continent. We know that land bridges existed when post flood waters were drawn down by the subsequent Ice Age. Animals off the Ark dispersed all over the planet populating the zones we find today.

[@Bomtombadi1]

@@alantasman8273and yes still no fossils of kangaroos to substantiate, so you’re basically arguing hypothetically and using that as the basis of plausibility.

[@raymondvanroest372]

@@alantasman8273 Show me your evidence of your claims!

[@janerkenbrack3373]

Hahahahahaha! You guys are always good for a laugh!

[@nathancook2852]

I use to laugh, now I am angry that they so blatantly spread science denial.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@nathancook2852 Make a science refutation point. Otherwise you're just a member of a childish peanut gallery.

[@Danny-rq6oz]

​@@nathancook2852Evolution is the joke. The amoeba, which is the "simplest" form of life is more complex than a modern city. Yet, somehow this merged from the primordial soup? Also, no evolutionist has ever explained where information in genes came from. We have never witnessed the creation of any new information ever.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

​@@Danny-rq6ozIts still not impossible. Do you realise that is exactly why its so hard to find life else where? The earth is perfect. Evolution makes sense because the Earth is virtually flawless for life

[@marshall3738]

But did they find a human with a dinosaur? Nope

[@alantasman8273]

Now why would a human want to hang around a dangerous dinosaur. How many dead humans are found around dead lions. How many humans get fossilized when buried feet from the surface or are eaten by animals on the surface. How many humans don't float in water ...bloat and are eaten by sea creatures?

[@ConservativeMirror]

9:22 So you're agreeing that the forms that lived with the dinosaurs are not the same as the forms living today? Kind of like the forms today evolved from the forms back then?

[@christinedean1543]

I went to the ark encounter recommended

[@kaamraanroshan68]

This man is absolutely right, even Prophet Noah himself rode one of these giant dinosaurs when he was leaving the ark . God bless that dino....

[@user-xn3qm2il4l]

No, that was PZ Myers making a fool of himself, as usual.

[@Dinoramascuplts-Tyrex]

I consider myself a semi-Christian I believe a very philosophical bible myself, my thoughts on it are it’s a group of lessons and how to live rather than a 100% accurate account of history. I also believe the “dirt or clay” or matter god made us from is the matter of the Big Bang, as well as evolving us meticulously. I’m not looking for an argument here. Mammals evolved before dinosaurs ever did, but not modern mammals metatherians evolved in the late Jurassic or early Cretaceous. You also simply dismiss science, in multiple parts. Evolution is structured on taxonomic level as which is related to what. I like seeing stuff like this as it gives me a view into other peoples opinions. I do think you should do your research or if you’re just lying then don’t do that. Dinosaurs went extinct ~66 million years ago. Not 6000 And we can trust science as it is almost synonymous with god. In the sense that his simplest creations are duplicable with science. In my view it is how the almighty created the universe. If you are going to keep your opinion on this, as you seem set in your ways, know there are major holes in your argument. Less like a strainer and more like a fishing net. And with that I wish you a blessed day, I support Christ and Christianity, but I’d be lying to say my faith is complete without science, adding science gives me a more mechanical view, in turn allowing me to believe in a great creator more. Long live Jesus And with that ✌️

[@Official_Rz]

You are the most logical Christian I've ever met, and that's coming from a former Christian, now atheist. I appreciate you and your outlook, God bless.

[@Dinoramascuplts-Tyrex]

@@Official_Rz thank you official rz I hope you can once again find your faith. If not live and let live. God bless you too.

[@grixi]

I'd consider myself in a similar camp, All tough I would challenge the notion that you would have to call yourself a "Semi Christian" for interpreting the Bible differently, I myself think the Bible is inspired by God. And I would not call myself a "Semi Christian" for rejecting literal interpretations of Genesis and other scriptures that may be more similar to a parable rather than an accurate account of history. And let's not forget that we modern Christians were not even the first to challenge a literal interpretation of the creation narratives in Genesis, there are a lot of prominent Christian thinkers who questioned it before modern times, here are some examples before 500 AD: Origen of Alexandria, Augustine of Hippo, Gregory of Nyssa, among others. And yes, Science is great, it is how we can explore, to the best of our limited capacities, God's magnificent creation. Some people may be drawn to science and think that it explains how things have turned out as great as they are, but forgetting that a necessary foundation would have to actualize and fine tune all of it first to work out harmoniously. At least that's what I think from my philosophizing🤣 God bless you brother, and I'd advise you stop referring to yourself as a "Semi-Christian" there are mainline churches that rejects YEC like most Methodists and Eastern Orthodox, And the belief in YEC is pretty much extinct in the field of Christian philosophy.

[@Dinoramascuplts-Tyrex]

@@grixi I don’t consider myself a semi Christian I think others would, especially the creator of this video. Thank you though. Although I did phrase it that way in my comment, sorry for the misinformation. I do definitely believe, but I phrase is semi Christian as it is not a widely preached mainline belief.

[@hogansheroes2793]

Jesus is Lord God Almighty and He referenced Genesis and the creation as fact. Was He mistaken?

[@rufusmcgee4383]

This kind of reasoning always makes me a little crazy. Your logic is fatally flawed. The evolutionist got it right, but that is not the reason your logic is fatally flawed. It's flawed because assuming dinosaurs and humans (and other modern creatures) lived together like you say, there would have to be literally millions of fossils demonstrating this, not just some random find here or there, which usually (always?) has an alternative explanation. Until you can realistically explain the absence of massive evidence of coexistence, your position is neither tenable nor logical.

[@7R4dicalized]

Who needs science and paleontology? This creator✅ that’s who.

[@sciencerules2825]

Calvin Smith takes willful ignorance to an entirely new level. The mammal and bird species which lived in the time of the non-avian dinosaurs were *NOT* the same mammal and bird species we have today. There were no extant badgers 66MYA. There were no extant ducks 66 MYA.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

How do you know that? The duck fossil that he discussed looks like modern ducks and cannot be proven to be different or the same species that exists currently. No proof can be adduced.

[@crabb9966]

Why are you guys so obsessed with this channel?aren't we free to believe what we believe in? Should a different belief be criminalized?

[@dooglysaintima758]

Is this supposed to be a joke?

[@user-ki1un4jg2d]

Darwin was the joke .

[@Roy_Camacho]

I don't believe it is.

[@nathancook2852]

@@user-ki1un4jg2d Darwin was wrong about a lot of things, but bashing or discrediting Darwin doesn't solve any problems for you. Darwin could have never existed, and there would still be more than enough evidence to prove evolution.

[@user-ki1un4jg2d]

@@nathancook2852 And people today are seeing apes ' magically ' turning into humans ? If that happened , it would make huge news all over CNN and elsewhere .

[@ArchIllini]

No, they really believe this. Unfortunately, denying the truth is easier than admitting a group of men made up some stories thousands of years ago to explain things they didn't understand and to gain power over others. He's quite an entertainer. He makes it seem like he's stating facts. What's funny is they don't believe in evolution but are basically saying all animals (including man), have evolved unbelievably fast in the past 6000 years (or however long they think the earth has been around).

[@mikeccall]

You can watch trash like this to glue back together your broken young earth creation theology, OR you can simply learn the many explanations that debunk this premise of this trash video. Free your mind. --------------------------------- The co-occurrence of dinosaur and mammalian fossils can be explained by the geological and biological processes that have shaped Earth's history. Here are a few reasons: Temporal Overlap: While dinosaurs dominated the Earth during the Mesozoic Era (about 252 to 66 million years ago), mammals also existed during this time, although they were relatively small and mostly nocturnal creatures. Thus, it's not uncommon to find their fossils alongside those of dinosaurs, especially in rock formations from the Mesozoic Era. Ecological Niches: Different species occupy different ecological niches, which are essentially roles within an ecosystem. While dinosaurs occupied various niches as the dominant terrestrial vertebrates, early mammals likely occupied niches that were different from those of dinosaurs. Some mammals were likely burrowers or small tree-dwellers, allowing them to coexist with dinosaurs without directly competing for resources. Preservation Bias: Fossilization is a rare process that requires specific conditions, such as rapid burial and mineralization of organic material. The environments conducive to fossilization might preserve the remains of both dinosaurs and mammals together, especially if they shared habitats or if one preyed upon the other. Taphonomy: Taphonomy refers to the processes that affect organic remains after death and before fossilization. In some cases, the same processes that lead to the preservation of dinosaur fossils may also preserve the remains of mammals, such as rapid burial in sediment layers or formation in environments with low oxygen levels, which slow decomposition. Continued Evolution: Mammals were present throughout the Mesozoic Era, but they remained relatively small and inconspicuous until the extinction event that marked the end of the era. After the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs around 66 million years ago, mammals underwent a significant adaptive radiation, diversifying into various ecological niches and eventually evolving into the diverse groups we see today. Fossils from this transitional period, such as those from the Paleocene and Eocene epochs following the extinction event, may contain remains of both early mammals and other transitional forms. In summary, the co-occurrence of dinosaur and mammalian fossils is a result of their shared history on Earth, as well as the complex interplay of geological, ecological, and biological factors that govern the fossilization process.

[@mikeccall]

expand to read the 5 more reasonable natural explanations

[@That_OneGuy46]

@@mikeccall I've been watching this video and the guys talking is only making me more and more pissed off.

[@temporary4384]

You guys should watch doctor who it would blow your minds

[@That_OneGuy46]

Why was it only dinosaurs that went on the Ark too? What about Terror Birds, Thunder Birds, Megafauna, and many, many, MANY other prehistoric animals? Do you have any idea how many creatures lived before and at the same time dinosaurs existed that weren't dinosaurs?

[@That_OneGuy46]

If you check the mammals that lived in the layers of dinosaurs, they're all small and are also extinct.

[@statutesofthelord]

You mean like that rabbit he found?

[@That_OneGuy46]

@@statutesofthelord You mean the Gomphos elkema? The earliest known ancestor of the rabbit which barely even looks like one yet, because it's still evolving?

[@statutesofthelord]

@@That_OneGuy46 Guy, did not pay attention to the video you are commenting on? "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening." If that is true, and it is, it means Evolution does not meet the scientific method criteria.

[@statutesofthelord]

@@That_OneGuy46 Guy, By trying to put God on the same plane as Evolution, you show that you aren't serious about the subject at hand, are confused, and believe in Evolution. If you are correct, we both go back to dust forever. If God is true, then you go back to dust forever, and his believers will live in glory forever. Please choose to follow your Creator - Jesus Christ, today.

[@That_OneGuy46]

@@statutesofthelord You realize that evolution doesn't disprove god right??? It only disproves the sects of Christianity which somehow believe that the stories of Genesis 1 and two are true stories, rather than allegorical. Unfortunately, you appear to be one of the misguided people who think evolution is fake, and that god created the earth in six days, despite all the facts saying otherwise and even different sects of Christianity telling you that you are wrong. You, my friend, are the confused one. All you've done is make up an argument, get disproved, proceed to make another claim that gets disproven, and then you try to escape the argument by insulting me, what a Christian you are.

[@ohzone6464]

dinosaurs didn't exisst at all.

[@MrDennisCLee]

Anyone using the term 'most people' in referring to what he ASSUMES people think cannot possibly know what he's talking about. There's more speculation, falsification and mythology than science in Smith's down-homey yarn.

[@manamanathegreat4986]

The level of cognitive dissonance required to believe dinosaurs were in a boat with people is absolutely mind-boggling.

[@crabb9966]

Why? Other animals are being shipped right now.

[@manamanathegreat4986]

@@crabb9966 Apples and Oranges.

[@crabb9966]

@@manamanathegreat4986 can you elaborate?

[@manamanathegreat4986]

@crabb9966 People shipping a few animals on metal ships, and the mythological stories of people carrying 2 of every animal on a wooden boat for a global flood that never happened because gods that don't exist told them to aren't remotely the same thing. And I didn't even mention the absurdity of people and dinosaurs living together, much less having them on this wooden boat as well.

[@crabb9966]

@@manamanathegreat4986 do you have concrete arguments? Inference?

[@PaulPetersen2014]

Sorry but your facts are wrong bogus sadly you’re wrong 3:00

[@guitarrens4912]

Let’s face it, even if there was a global flood with a wooden boat on it, that doesn’t mean for one instance there was a god involved.

[@alantasman8273]

God brought the animals to the Ark and sealed the Ark door once Noah and his family were inside. Read the scriptures.

[@That_OneGuy46]

The fact that birds lived during the time of dinosaurs doesn't mean anything, some dinosaurs evolved into birds, triceratops did not evolved into birds, but dinosaurs like archaeopteryx did, and the evolved at different speeds, the birds that existed back then were not true birds yet, they were just closely related

[@djsarg7451]

Sad to see YEC twist facts over one word in the Bible Day (yom). Saying the literal understanding of the word day (yom) in Genesis must be 24 hours is wrong. Yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, the word yom literally is used in different ways to refer to different time spans: Period of light (as contrasted with the period of darkness), Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length (Biblical Hebrew has no word for things like epoch) I looked at the Word of God and it says the Earth is OLD. See: Deut 33:15, Habakkuk 3:6, Hebrews 4:10 and Gen 2:4. The Earth is 4.543 billion years old and this is no problem with the Bible. It is only a problem for Young Earthers. They are the Flat Earther of today. YEC read only one book Genesis. The Bible and science are not enemies. Romans 1:20" For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God." YEC do not believe in Rom 1:20. The world and science deceive us, by YEC logic. Very sad.

[@Danny-rq6oz]

YEC deny Romans 1:20? Where did you pull this from? Also, don't confuse historical science with observable science, they aren't even remotely similar. Traditional science is something you can observe, replicate, and test. This is the science that has given us everything we have today. Historical "science" has given us nothing, except evolution.

[@djsarg7451]

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” YEC tells us that what scientists, like myself, see, study and measure lies to us. We measure the speed of light. The speed of light has not changed it is 186,000 miles per second. We can see close stars, we can see stars that are far, very far away. We can see galaxies, close and see galaxies very far away. These all tell us the universe was created 13.787 (±0.020) billion years ago, this is firm as many tools have been used to come to this age. YEC tells us this is all a lie. Hebrews 4:10 says we are in the 7th day, the day of rest. If day 7 is a long time span (since the creation of Eve), then days 1 to 6 must be long time spans. In Genesis 2:4. The entire time span of God’s creative activity is called a “day”. The Hebrew word yôm, translated “day,” can be three distinct definitions: daylight hours, 24 hours or a long time span. Hebrews 4:10 tells us day in Gen1 is a long time span. Yom in Gen. 1 is not 24 hours, never has been, never will.

[@alantasman8273]

Exodus 20:11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven which he gave mankind as an example to rest one day out of seven. Your knowledge of the scriptures is woefully lacking.

[@djsarg7451]

So you agree the 7th day is on going. Thus days 1 to 6 are not 24 hours?

[@Danny-rq6oz]

@@djsarg7451 I don't know what translation you are using, but we are NOT in the final rest yet (7th day/Sabbath). Hebrews 4 which you quote says, "If Jesus had given them rest, then He would not have spoken of another day.... therefore labor diligently to enter into that rest.". The eternal Sabbath is heaven, and Hebrews 4 commands us to labor diligently in good works and obedience here on Earth so we may enter the final and eternal Sabbath. Also, if you believe in theistic evolution, then death came before the Fall, and if death came before the Fall, then God's Creation was NOT good as He proclaimed. The Bible says the wages of sin is death, so sin would have entered the world before Adam and Eve, and the whole Bible narrative would be put on its head, and God would be nothing more than an author of confusion.

[@JohnDoe-hr4xj]

The earth is flat with lights in de sky, just for us. The sun is in orbit of the earth, we are the centre of the universe. The earth and the universe is about 6 thousand years old. And 2 thousand years ago there was a bloke in Palestina and he was God. 😅😅

[@filmevoncosima]

First half of your comment of course is nonsense, as intended by you. The second half should be true, if we only look at the evidence and put away our religious glasses of the Dawinism cult

[@dooglysaintima758]

This gotta be a joke💀

[@sliglusamelius8578]

Why are my posts deleted? Stop the censorship it's pathetic.

[@andrewshear2927]

I'm sorry but no, dinosaurs and man did not live together.

[@LV4EVR]

And you *know* this how exactly?

[@andrewshear2927]

Well, first do you believe that dinosaurs exist and there were carnivores and herbivores ?

[@davidgardner863]

Except for birds.

[@andrewshear2927]

Sure

[@trenthobson2756]

I'm sorry but yes, dinosaurs and humans did live together.

[@zeldafansonly7484]

8:20 everything you said in this video entirely contradicts the video you made about evolution hahahha

[@zeldafansonly7484]

hahaha cherry picking haha

[@user-xn3qm2il4l]

You're talking about atheists and the Bible, of course.

[@mattwhite7287]

​@@user-xn3qm2il4lsure, why not? The perfect book is perfectly imperfect. Almost like it was written by bronze aged savages. 😅 Sorry bro, but your god that is everywhere, at all times, knows everyone and everything should have accounted for this. He failed his junior year autobiography essay, and now needs you to cover for him. 😅

[@user-xn3qm2il4l]

@@mattwhite7287 I'm glad you agree. Cherry picking goes along with every other atheist logical fallacy. The "bronze age savages" line, for example. They weren't "savages" and no historian worth his or her credentials would ever call them that. I'd go on, but I seriously doubt you'd care.