Disucssion on Shri Ramayana with Shri Keshav Rao Tadipatri

Disucssion on Shri Ramayana with Shri Keshav Rao Tadipatri

[@shivapriyaannamalai]

It was an absolute pleasure listening to Tadipatri Garu. Such scholars are needed to dispel any confusions people may have.

[@kamalavenkatesh8862]

What Ranga Rajan Narasimhan says , we do not want younger generations to get such a wrong informations. At least now so many scholars are living , so we can get the informations through them .

[@lalitha3804]

Yes that's the reason 🙏

[@SanilPeriyamana]

Infact Dushyant's arguments are a blessing in disguise! We could listen to a series of lectures of great Vedic scholars like Keshav Rao ji. Thank you Rangarajan Narasimhan Swami!

[@rajamaninv6446]

We have been taking part in the discourses of many scholors since a long time on sri ramayanam. No one to the best of my knowledge ever said that lord rama was born seven thousand years ago.

[@rajagopalanthiruvengadatha9258]

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namah: Thoroughly enjoyed the question and answer session and intellectual debate/discussion. Human minds are limited. Science is created by human mind through observations. Obvious to state that we cannot observe, determine and perceive everything.. Our guiding principle is Sampradhya as taught to us by our elders. I agree with the views of Shri Keshava Rao. Thanks to Shri Rangarajan Swami.

[@pattabisri]

Yet another time strongly condemn both Nastikas Dhushyanth & Jai sri Saranathan for creating an unnecessary controversy about Lord Rama's birth. Sir the various interviews you do with Acharya purushas & other learned Vedic scholars on one hand strongly reiterate how sanathana dharma to be learnt & practiced on the other hand is an opportunity for a common man like me to listen to so many such gurus and scholars. No word shall suffice your contributions to our Dharma. My sincere ashtamga namaskarams to you.

[@venkatraghavan_varadarajan]

Fantabulous discusion with Shri Keshav Rao Tadipatri Swamin..🙏 We all enjoyed it..👍🙏 My Pranams to Shri.Rangarajan Narasimhan Swamin..🙇🙏 Om Namo Bhagvate Vasudevaya..🙏🕉️🚩 எப்போதும் எதிராசன் வடிவழகு நம் இதயத்துளதால் இல்லை நமக்கெதிர், இல்லை நமக்கெதிர்..🙏👍 Jai Shriram..🙋🕉️🚩🙏

[@user-up7cw3pz9w]

Superb explanation. Bhagyam to listen to such great scholors of our time with good knowledge in science and computers So clear

[@Vaishnavsashreek]

Just one correction swamy, Devareer referred to madhwas and Vaishnavas seperately but even madhwas are also Vaishnavas and come under vaishnava Sampradayas being hari Sarvottama pratipadya like us srivaishnavas

[@kgdhouhithri]

Yes but it was more of a slip of the tongue. Sri Rangarajan Swami is very much aware of this.😊🙏🏽

[@raghavendrannagarajan1651]

Traditional learning is most important is what these gentlemen have emphasized. But unfortunately today it's not happening. Lifestyle is completely changed. We need to put some extraordinary efforts to make it possible. So naturally people make Google as their Guru. And blindly believe attractive speakers like Dushyant, etc. and hence are getting misguided. No iota of a doubt in it. Wearing the coat of an Astika and speaking against the scriptures is more dangerous than the mere nAstika. So what you are doing is really a fantastic job to interview so many people like this and creating an awareness among the truth seekers that "everything that is being lectured by such corporate lecturers shouldn't be taken for granted but to be considered after properly examining it". Thank you Sir.

[@venkataraman1]

How brain storming!! enlightening to listen to gurus like you ...thank you so much for this.

[@n.c.kaushik8208]

He claimed dushyant shridhar for his act without his answer... But see his answer for all your questions...: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5OYgWuvo7lgjdksi=SWNAoNMlOeCkyY8T இக்கானொளியின் மூலம் ஒன்று புரிகிறது... அவர் ஒன்றும் ஆஸ்திகநாஸ்திகரெல்லாம் இல்லை... ஒருவர் தரப்பு ந்யாயத்தை விசாரம் செய்யாமல் அவர்கள்மீது குற்றப்பழி சுமத்துவது தவறு...

[@LeshmiKrubaMantradhiSarma]

Gaining,Much More Knowledge,Regarding Our Vedas,n Its Treasurable Infornations In,Each n Every Vdo's..Thnk U 🙏So Kuch..Swamy Ji🕉

[@user-ip4bt3wk7v]

🙏ஸ்ரீமதே ராமானுஜாய நமஹ🙏 Very very good speaking swamy. 🙏Thanking you 🙏

[@lakshmiv1662]

Great explanation by Keshav Rao ji.

[@lakshmiv1662]

We should teach the younger generation the science in our Shastras. Shastras induce, scientific inquiry and analytical thinking. Western Science only deals with trying to explain the material world Our Shastras explain, the science of mind, matter and consciousness and encourages us to question.

[@raghurr2]

It was a pleasure to listen to the ethical way of debate after a long time blessed to hear this

[@mychessmaster]

is this matter discussed in north as well. if this is a serious attack on sanathana should be vehemently opposed condemned by whole country who have faith in it.. Another person may come and say this calculation is wrong and he will give another day.

[@amarnathnarahari5156]

It's absolutely satisfying to see truth being defended brilliantly. 🙏🏻

[@padmasreechakra5263]

Om Namo Venkatesaya

[@shivnarayan.v579]

One small thought. Before even releasing the Ramayana book that Dushyanth Sridhar ji wrote, he himself explained about Shri Rama's birth according to what all Aacharyaas said, abiding by what Shri Valmiki said. But, just during this book release, he has collaborated with Jayashree Saranathan madam and researched and claim that Shri Rama's birth dates back to nearly 7,000 years back.....So, does he want the people who believed & understood what he said before, in his explanations , to erase that and forget about that and accept what he claims now? What's the guarantee that in future, other statements or facts of his will be withdrawn and goes against Aachaaryaas' and rishis' preachings, by the name of research work?

[@rajamaninv6446]

One of my friends says that science is not exhaustive. What was believed to be a fact by science some times ago is contradicted today by some scientists. Even what is believed to be a fact today may be contradicted tomorrow. What was perceived by the saints and seers theough yoga sakthi is constant even today.

[@kgdhouhithri]

That is so true!

[@subbaiyannadimuthu4607]

🙏Hare krishna Radhe Radhe prabhuji 🙏🙏🙏

[@rajamaninv6446]

For authenticity of any ithihasa or purana one should rely solely on the version of the original author. For any point under question of sri ramayanam saint valmikis version should be reliable.

[@kgdhouhithri]

It's a brilliant move by Sri Rangarajan Swami to do an English educational video with such a pious, dignified, knowledgeable Swami from Sri Maadhva Sampradayam. As that questionable book is in English, this will help neutral [and hopefully, even biased] minds to think through this. Adiyen shared this with a Telugu Smartha friend of mine. ❤🙏🏽

[@jagandeep007]

It is good that a controversy has broken out from Dhushyanth works that there is debates and people are learning more about Ramayana and Lord Ram. People will gain more knowledge out of this..

[@arenganathana9828]

அடியேன் 🙏🏿

[@sundararajreddy877]

I request the both to deliver correct proposition of Sri ram birth period. Don't confuse the people

[@harikumarlakshmi9257]

Is now Keshav swami living in US?

[@padminip16]

I need a clarification here on the findings of Mr. Dushyant Sridhar. It is believed that the incarnations of Matsya, Koorma, Varaaha, Nrusimha, Vamana took place during Krutha yugam which was before Thretha yugam when Rama had lived. As per Dushyant Ji there was no life or light before 7000 years. Then does he mean to say that the avatharams of krutha yugam didn't happen? So belief on lord's avatharams are false? My god can't think of it.

[@kgdhouhithri]

Good question 😅🙏🏽 I have no idea how he even thought of considering the inclusion of that funny research in his book!

[@venuxxx11]

Tadipatri is a place close to our heart. My elder sister's family lived there for years in the 1900 to 1998.🙏 My namaskarams to you both sir. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@kgdhouhithri]

Beautiful conversation ❤🙏🏽 Really very educational and inspiring 🙏🏽🌹🌹🌹 Dhanyasmi Dhanyasmi Dhanyasmi is all adiyen can manage to say ❤🙏🏽

[@user-ip4bt3wk7v]

🙏அடியேன்❤

[@nbm1804]

🙏Superlative enriching conversation.Apart from debunking the myths and false information propagated by pseudo scholars like Dushyanth Sridhar, this podcast has revealed a lot of authentic information on various topics from our Vedas and Scriptures hitherto unknown to many of us. Extremely grateful to you for arranging such enlightening knowledge sharing sessions with scholars from the Vedic Parampara.🙏

[@-_.0O]

😂

[@laxmis2750]

Rystal clear conversations. 👌

[@lakshmiv1662]

Our panchangam is scientific. Any event in time is directly correlated with astronomical phenomenon which is Pratyaksha. For example, chittirai masam, Shukla paksha navami, Ashlesha nakshatram gives the relative angle between the moon and the sun, the phase of moon, the background star on full moon day and the background star on the navami day and the position of the Sun relative to the equinox. A Gregorian calendar day does not have direct correlation with astronomicsl coordinates in this way. Therefore, a lot of reduction in our knowledge is taking place by saying Jan X, 5114 etc. dates.

[@kgdhouhithri]

Great point 👍🏽🙏🏽

[@sunilfauji]

Jai Shri Ram

[@Tulsi1894]

Swamy, please take the opinion of Dr. Venkatesh also.

[@pariksitanumanthan2620]

Excellent 🙏

[@harikumarlakshmi9257]

Are we fighting for Rama janmabhumi which is 1.8 crore years old

[@anantha05]

The guru says from this video absence of evidence is not falsifyimg with given fossil evidence

[@rajeevganesh7144]

Keshavaji's explanation of Maha yugas is beautiful

[@kuppuswamys4322]

For a devotee it doesn't at all matter when Lord Sri Rama was born.We adore Him and worship Him

[@krishnaswamyramachandran8531]

Stars apearing is sequencial.But the time of lord rama born was described by vamiki may be how many cycle before dusyant date.To be checked.

[@natarajratnam1720]

Ananto wai vedaa👃🙌

[@AlarmelMangai-ie2tg]

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺

[@SriSriRaRa]

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749]

Vaishnavism is a Guru parampara. That one has to believe his guru's words and not one's own knowledge. By doing research in maya sakthi of baghavan how one can found out baghavan. Maya can't fully explain reality.

[@msr5679]

In today's adverse atmosphere against Hindus in Tamilnadu , we need Sri Rengarajan Narasimhan , who is spending his life for the noble cause of protecting the Hindu temple rights in Tamilnadu, very much . Similarly, we need Sri Dhushyanth Sridhar , at a young age doing good by his Upanyasams . In the present scenario , as I observe , there is a difference in the method of approach followed to know about the date of birth of our God Sri Raamaa. Now , we have seen a number of scholars giving their expert opinions . It is high time , any one Hindu organization can coordinate , bring scholars of eminence to a common place , discuss and debate the plus and minus of both the approaches, bring out the RICH KNOWLEDGE OF OUR RISHIS IN THE VEDIC ERA and make the Hindu Bhakthaas understand the High standard of knowledge that prevailed in the various fields of Religion & Science.. That will show the the WISDOM OF OUR VEDIC CULTURE and GREATNESS OF OUR SANATHAN DHARMA TO THE WHOLE WORLD , Hope we will be taken through a Right path in the near future . JAI SRI RAM JAI HIND VANDE MATHARAM

[@rangaswamy1836]

When there are so many burning issues faced by the country,let us not waste our energy on this issue which may help certain individuals to gain publicity.

[@santhanamsrinivasan8540]

Whether our country was not having any burning issues. In spite of spending our full energy whether all burning issues are solved.what is tiny to one will be big fo another. Pursuit of knowledge in any field is not a waste for that particular individual .

[@priasree1393]

👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@PVSNarayanan]

Please invite Nilesh Nilkanth Oak who has different research model for Ramayan timelines (suggesting around 12906 BC), he also mention if there are new evidence and model, this date can be change further

[@throwaway2373]

Should a case be filed for hurting hindu sentiments? It is strange that these crypto "sanatanis" respect other faiths' sentiments but dont have the humility to respect their own faith and gurus! This is very strange !

[@AnandRajappan]

As per Sri Keshav Rao Tadipatri Swamy @<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1710">28:30</a>+ he asked to question ⁉️ i will request to clarify and explain why Lakshman Swamy in saying he will serve 100 years in the Srimad Valmiki Ramayanam परवान् अस्मि काकुत्स्थ त्वयि वर्ष शतम् स्थिते | स्वयम् तु रुचिरे देशे क्रियताम् इति माम् वद || Why is it in conflict with the 10+1 thousand years of Rama Rajya

[@vikramsrinivasan8176]

Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha, Srimathe Rangaramanuja Mahadesikaya Namaha, Srimathe Sri Varaha Mahadesikaya Namaha Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy Thiruvadigaley Sharanam Adiyen thought RN swamy will scold me in some comment. Nothing like that happened. Great Success for adiyen. :) S. I am done swamy. Dasanudasan

[@VR-ne9tr]

Dear sir, so far any swamis you reached out for opinion, has spoken in favor of Dushyant ?

[@OurTemples]

NONE. No one will speak in the future also because what Dushyant said is TOTALLY WRONG and ashatriya and Nastika's words

[@n.c.kaushik8208]

​@@OurTemplesYou claimed dushyant shridhar for his act without his answer... But see his answer for all your questions...: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5OYgWuvo7lgjdksi=SWNAoNMlOeCkyY8T இக்கானொளியின் மூலம் ஒன்று புரிகிறது... அவர் ஒன்றும் ஆஸ்திகநாஸ்திகரெல்லாம் இல்லை... ஒருவர் தரப்பு ந்யாயத்தை விசாரம் செய்யாமல் அவர்கள்மீது குற்றப்பழி சுமத்துவது தவறு...

[@sudarsananvaradarajan1316]

Swamin What are you waiting for, to end this issue? We love to see your video on many other issues. Don't unknowingly increase the fame of Dushyant. We know he is not the authority for Ramayan Your worry is unwarranted. Dasan

[@kgdhouhithri]

This is for the uninformed, young followers of Dushyant. They need sufficient guidance, right?

[@n.c.kaushik8208]

​@@kgdhouhithriYou claimed dushyant shridhar for his act without his answer... But see his answer for all your questions...: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5OYgWuvo7lgjdksi=SWNAoNMlOeCkyY8T இக்கானொளியின் மூலம் ஒன்று புரிகிறது... அவர் ஒன்றும் ஆஸ்திகநாஸ்திகரெல்லாம் இல்லை... ஒருவர் தரப்பு ந்யாயத்தை விசாரம் செய்யாமல் அவர்கள்மீது குற்றப்பழி சுமத்துவது தவறு...

[@sunilfauji]

Satya Sanatan Hindu Dharam ki Jai

[@Hinthuraajaa]

ராம் கோபால்

[@jaganathanmeenakshisundara784]

One or two may coincide. But hundreds of pramanams may not coincide. So what Dushyanth Sridhar may be correct. In Ramayanam written by Valmeegi number of pramanams can be identified even now. in Bharatha desam.

[@AnandRajappan]

@<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="64">1:04</a>:00+ i agree 💯 👍 with whatever he quoted and i used to wonder how beautifully the modern guru's are spreading misinterpretation?! But I think Shri Dushyant Sridhar ji is not in same category nor he is doing such a harm, rather advice to follow one's Guru parampara. I would say it's not correct to compare them - as I don't see such explanation given for the same context by Dusyant Ji, it's totally unjustified comparison.

[@mkp189]

Swamin the current claims regarding Ram setu is not the actual setu for simple reason that the distance between bharat and lanka is 1000 of yojanas that means the distance is too less and real lanka is somewhere else. The issue with raking ramu setu has some ulterior motives.

[@balajisrinivasan4671]

Rightly pointed out but a small correction with a little knowledge I have on this subject. It is 100 yojanas. Even if it is 100 yojanas (800 miles) it must not be the current Srilanka.

[@AnandRajappan]

@<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2726">45:26</a> he is conflicting his own views just for argument sake. Smriti pramana clearly mentioned 100 - satha manam bhavathi. And he says its very much possible for exordinary people - we are not speaking about Hanuman or exceptional already accepted chiranjivis. But we are discussing about the span of life spent by Bhagavan Sri Rama who saus ge is a Nara and wants to hide himself from being projected as acts done by a daivik Sakthi (obviously no one is saying it's not possible, but why will Sri Rama do that? that to going against Smriti vakya?!)

[@Thulasisinusandnose]

Mr Rangarajan you are sick!

[@ananddevarajan2168]

Dushyant's Ramayana should have been based purely on scriptures not software .Some softwares are also called virus .

[@AnandRajappan]

The question ❓ asked @<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2210">36:50</a>+ is a very contradictory statement - why is the agama, Sruthi - Smriti - Itihaasa - Purana, graded in that order by Acharyas of Sanathan Dharma (they don't say that everything is pramana - as we can easily find so many contradiction in the later that's why it's graded down) - it's Acharya purusha's conviction and i believe it can't be passed on to the westerners - blaming west for everything is not correct is just escaping from facing facts.

[@ganapathiramansubramaniam5434]

Religion should be private and to be banned in public utterance

[@ravichandranraghavan6019]

Rengatajanswami takes the pain for sampradayam while dush....takes coins for malugning

[@AnandRajappan]

@<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="65">1:05</a>:45+ Whatever Shri Rangarajan Narasimha Swamy is referring is a misquote, are you comparing Dushyanth with Buddha? Why don't you compare similarly with Ramanuja who gave a different interpretation to Vedic statements (like how he explained - famous - "Kapyaasam Pundarekameva Akshani")? Sad, This statements are just personal emotions against Dushyanth and nothing else, is what it reduces to.

[@OurTemples]

Look at you. Just f off from my channel

[@sudharshant3161]

Not in this video, but in some other video: My suggestion: You mentioned the name of rajneesh while referring some spiritual matters. Please don't use his name.as He's not a spiritual teacher,sir.. Thanks Regards

[@satzkb1927]

By deciding who is right orwrong Nothing is going to be changed somany persons have explained இதிகாச and poranas take this is one such leave the bakthas to decide

[@ganapathiramansubramaniam5434]

What Narasimhan says may have valid reasons.but his intention seems notto protect hertugar but ventilating venum against dhuswanth.so he deserves to be ignored

[@arunminnas]

Swamin Rangarajan and Swamin Keshava Rao. Can't understand how Dushyant Sridhar can say Rama was born 7000 years ago. Even accounting for the fact that he was born towards the end of Treta yuga. What this implies is that since we are in the 5000th(approx) year of Kali, Dwapara yuga lasted only 2000 years? Defies all logic. Dushyant knows this very well and yet chose to ignore this fact. Maybe he is trying to cater to the google acharyas and youngsters who may at least try to read the Ramayana. About Jayasree Saranathan, not sure what her credentials are but arriving at a timeline based on Ramayana can mean only one thing, she has neither read the Ramayana nor heard of it.

[@AnandRajappan]

@<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="985">16:25</a>+ there is no absence of evidence rather there is scientific evidence on Rama Sethu and it's man made structural proof. It's not absence of proof, it is not.

[@AnandRajappan]

Biggest joke 19:26 - might be created by devotees - where is the proof of recreation then? As this statement is neither supported by agama pramana nor by historical evidence. And only foolish believers can justify anything and everything like this.

[@AnandRajappan]

There is limitations on our current understandings as well on what those agama are telling as there are so many conflicting views, so with same limitations you are trying to read and understand that is limitless or that which is beyond current human understanding.

[@vijayalakshmis1172]

If Dushyant and Jayashree research is wrong why still they stick to that and clsim what tgey have done is right. Then all the acharitan and vidwans explanations they are not accepting? Many juniors follow Dushyant so wrong information should not go in to their minds. Let us preserve our values and traditions. For sake of pooularity are they doing?

[@n.c.kaushik8208]

You claimed dushyant shridhar for his act without his answer... But see his answer for all your questions...: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5OYgWuvo7lgjdksi=SWNAoNMlOeCkyY8T இக்கானொளியின் மூலம் ஒன்று புரிகிறது... அவர் ஒன்றும் ஆஸ்திகநாஸ்திகரெல்லாம் இல்லை... ஒருவர் தரப்பு ந்யாயத்தை விசாரம் செய்யாமல் அவர்கள்மீது குற்றப்பழி சுமத்துவது தவறு...

[@srinivasmuthu249]

Dushyant Sridhar does not say that there was no life in the earth 7000 years back. It is an absolute lie

[@narayanasamymadhu]

Why so much of agitation , it's not for people like us who are aged, it's for our grand children . Please answer points raised in the book. I am a total believer of God. Don't abuse other please answer point by point.

[@venkatramanan2519]

எவனோ-? எதையோ-? சொல்லிட்டு போறான். அதுக்கு இவன் ஏன் இந்த ஆட்டம் ஆடுறான்-? கடவுள், புராணம் எல்லாமே கட்டுக்கதை தானே-?

[@n.c.kaushik8208]

அப்ப எதுக்கு வீடியோ இந்த பாக்க வந்த...

[@Thulasisinusandnose]

Mr Rangarajan Narasimhan it is obvious you are extremely JEALOUS of Dushyanth and Jayshree. You are not able to digest the fame and attention these two are getting. You have tried your best to be in the limelight, but you are hardly getting any attention. No modern human being will accept that Rama lived crores of years back and he ruled for 11000 years. Blind faith days are gone. Today's youngsters need logical explanations. Your old school people do not allow any change. That is the bane of Hinduism.

[@HariVayuGurus]

Today's modern human being will become ancestor one day. we all accept what our ancestors and Acharyas taught us. It is the question of trust. If everyone starts asking for evidence to prove father's reality, what will happen?

[@raghavendrannagarajan1651]

But for the truth seekers Vedas, purAnAs, itihAsAs are the documents in evidence. In which there are mentions about four yugas, manvantaras, etc. On that basis the Tretayuga ended crores of years back and not just a few thousand years back. So for us people who believe in shAsthrAs as evidence, Shri. Dushyant's remark is definitely a misguiding factor. Hence not able to tolerate. There's no question of jealousy in this.

[@Thulasisinusandnose]

@@raghavendrannagarajan1651 It is so sad that you guys sitting on your puranas and Ithihasas do not understand why Dhusyanth and Jayshree are doing what they are doing. Dushyanth is very well convinced that Ithihas are our history. But in a changing world of scholarship and hitory one needs to show undisputable evidence. So Dushyanth is collecting Scriptural, sculptural and inscriptional evidence and presents in his book which could be accepted as history! Is there any scholar in the world who accepts Ramayan as history?

[@satzkb1927]

Why not we புட் an எண்டு to this controversy people came to know about this mistake instead of wasting time and energy and money we will start some constructive better work lotmore things are waiting to be taken care

[@ShantiNarayanan]

I am a huge fan of DS but Rangarajan sir has taken a massive effort to educate the Shastric perspective of this story. This is the most healthy way to grow santana dharma by putting forward Shastri pramanam to prove a point. And how many learned people's opinion we got to her, thanks to him! We should thank for him taking this boldly all alone. I have my reservation on what spoke about DS attire and haircut initially and I don't think it should be done at all. But this is phenomenal and should continue.

[@OurTemples]

Who asked you to waste. Nameless people like you can go elsewhere

[@OurTemples]

The dress is talked to tell that the person who preaches must practice, otherwise it cant be considered authentic. It is just academic. If he claims himself as a "vedic scholar" he must dress like a vedic scholar, not like a woman with jewels

[@sumathideena6479]

Thank you very much to great aachcharyaa 🙏

[@vikramsrinivasan8176]

Edhu Constructive work office canteen coffee? Come on, RN has devoted his life to SriRam. I am with him. If DS wants let him do something like Jaggi not adulterate existing Sampradhayam.

[@lajamur1]

You can have a healthy difference of opinion or interpretation, but please avoid calling Dushyant as a nastika. -Murali

[@username92707]

Astika is one who has unshaken faith in the vedas and scriptures. Does not distort……

[@OurTemples]

Can do that when you stop calling EVR a Nastika

[@vikramsrinivasan8176]

What else do you call a person who changes your birthdate? Assume someone says you were born on 1 Jan 1990 because planetary positions today are like that 😂 so it should have been like that years ago. Who will you believe, your parents or x & y? We are in the world of people changing their own parents'given name in the reason of nameology & numerology. Elders are not respected. Why don't you ask him to respect elders instead?

[@lajamur1]

​@@OurTemplesI have a lot of respect for Shri Rangarajan Narasimhan, for his work in saving temples. But, I beg to differ on this issue. I am more convinced by Shri Dushyant's explanations on this issue. I too struggle to convince my children on their questions, and Shri Dushyant's approach helps me to keep them within Sanatana dharma.

[@shivnarayan.v579]

One small thought. Before even releasing the Ramayana book that Dushyanth Sridhar ji wrote, he himself explained about Shri Rama's birth according to what all Aacharyaas said, abiding by what Shri Valmiki said. But, just during this book release, he has collaborated with Jayashree Saranathan madam and researched and claim that Shri Rama's birth dates back to nearly 7,000 years back.....So, does he want the people who believed & understood what he said before, in his explanations , to erase that and forget about that and accept what he claims now? What's the guarantee that in future, other statements or facts of his will be withdrawn and goes against Aachaaryaas' and rishis' preachings, by the name of research work?