"Might get a wet foot here" _puts entire shoe underwater_ Love the video man! Great project and can't wait to see more
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@jordanlynch86874 жыл бұрын
@@Project-Air maybe a pair of rubber boats and a small rubber dingy(boat) would be nice to invest in.
@VolV84 жыл бұрын
Silver soldering for brass-to-brass. Get a beefy servo for high resistance in water. Gumboots.
@svennykennyheller63324 жыл бұрын
Excellent Idea
@axelusul4 жыл бұрын
Great work, need to improve on "winging it" and look at areas where you could efficiently make the structure stronger and more homogeneous for V2.
@miguelsalami4 жыл бұрын
Ya what VolV8 said👍👍
@Wolfenion4 жыл бұрын
I always liked these kind of boats. Built a large one myself years ago with multiple coaxial motors (two sets). In my opinion, you should not mess with your original design in order to get it to skim on the water. When you increase your throttle further, you will have a tendency for the rear to want to lift out from the water due to your motor being mounted horizontally (parallel to your hull). The motor will induce a substantial torque on your frame, something you will experience once you open up the throttle. Looking forward to see where this goes. ; )
@MorningView4 жыл бұрын
Nose weight
@larryjones53883 жыл бұрын
I believe by installing two smaller pontoons on the rear of the boat will enhance the performance
@thomasmills67894 жыл бұрын
James I appreciate your honesty and how genuine your videos are, I can see how nervous and excited you are each time you test something for the first time. I know exactly how you feel, when you rushed the last part of something complicated and when it starts going a little wrong you just want to go ahead and keep trying anyway! Crashed quite a few experimental RC planes that way. Anyway, thank you for the beautiful filming, editing, and workmanship. Love the use of the laser cutter. So much more professional-looking afterward than 3D printing although everything has limitations and uses. Looking forward to part 2!
@iforce2d4 жыл бұрын
Cool project! My thoughts.... - place the motors side by side to avoid efficiency losses - place motors as low as possible to have thrust line more in line with CoM (reduce pushing nose down) - place motors as rearward as possible (same reason as above, plus counterweights the nose being pushed down) - move sponsons forward so that less of the torque due to thrust goes into pushing them downward - use aero rudder and maybe even elevator to trim for desired pitch, if you get anywhere near 100mph these will become quite effective (not sure if this is against the rules though...) - maybe widen rear skid? - maybe rotate sponsons (pitch) a bit so that the angle between their bottom surface and the water is as shallow as possible at the target speed - the further rear-ward the in-water rudder can be placed, the more effective it will be for the same drag You mentioned in a comment that you wanted a pair of CW/CCW props, but I doubt it will matter. It doesn't even matter much on a plane which has no (relatively) solid water surface to steady itself against. Just use two-bladed props of the highest pitch you have available. Regarding weight distribution, I pondered this a bit and it seems to me that you probably want to have equal 'loading' (g/cm2) for each of the three support points. But I don't know for sure, and it would be near impossible to ensure you're getting this at the target speed anyway. That concludes todays know-it-all lecture :)
@steviebee19894 жыл бұрын
Isn’t it more efficient to have a push and a pull prop? The Mars helicopter is using in-line props and the fastest propeller plane in WWII was a late German design that had a pull prop at the front and a push propeller at the rear.
@iforce2d4 жыл бұрын
@@steviebee1989 nope, at least not when they are close together. I think the props on the DO335 were far apart enough that being inline with each other would not be such an issue, plus they weren't particularly concerned with efficiency. Mars helicopter is probably subject to a whole bunch of constraints which steered them to that format, notably the extremely thin atmosphere which requires as much blade area as possible, with smaller blades (eg. a quadro-copter) being ineffective.
@socialus56894 жыл бұрын
Oh shit you're here! Lovely content you make as well, New zealander.
@KnowledgePerformance73 жыл бұрын
Some quick reads say that contra rotation provides between 6% and 16% more efficiency than normal propellers. You also can get more thrust by using them as a "staged accelerator" by using a high pitch second prop
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Tune into the next one for upgrades and speed! 😁 Mega thanks again to my Patreons for helping me with the funds to build this bad boi. www.patreon.com/jameswhomsley 🤟 Don't worry rocket and aircraft fans, I have a few smaller projects going on in the background I'm plan on scattering alongside this speed boat mini series. Thanks for watching!
@felixleveille84414 жыл бұрын
The pontoons would be even more efficient if the underside was like a V-hull shape.... there would be even less friction on the water 👍 I really don’t know if it would work but it is just an idea! Great work on the build 🤙
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
@@felixleveille8441 Thanks! I'm going to be adding planing shoes that are angled to a point. ☺️
@suhelsheth46213 жыл бұрын
Im a 40 year old Father of 3 my eldest son is 10 and im showing him your video so he too can learn something and be inspired . You have good manners and i respect the fact you show your failures as well as your success Keep up the good work
@zadraking2 жыл бұрын
Project Air is the type of guy to always lose his rudder.
@ruuman4 жыл бұрын
That was great, good choice on colour, the bluebirds speed records motivated so many people into engineering. I think it's a fine tribute to Donald!
@caiuswongminzhesvps47502 жыл бұрын
if you are making a mark two of this,i suggest using the 'ground effect'.
@yayayayya47314 жыл бұрын
You can add 2 rudders instead of 1....it will make it more manoeuvrable........and yeah, making the tail skid larger is a good idea...but don't make it too large...instead make the entire thing a little( JUST A LITTLE) nose heavy..... And if you want to use servos to steer the rudder, get powerful ones....cause at high speeds in water, small servos may not work.... And one more thing...I love your videos😄😄😄😄😄
@Hraesvelgr444 жыл бұрын
Would you be able to go faster if you made most of the hull out of waterproof aircraft foamboard? Like the foamboard that Flite Test uses? It would make it much lighter, meaning more speed
@WindThrusters2 жыл бұрын
I have often thought that Campbells Blue bird should have had a horizontal air stabiliser near the stern. Just as aircraft do. The problem was that it took off because it did not have aerodynamic stability like an aircraft. Although in your case the high thrust line serves to keep the nose down. What about if the thrust is reduced at high speed? Could the same happen here as happened to Campbell? Does not having all that weight and pressure from the floats ahead of the centre of gravity make it unstable if it leaves the water? Enough horizontal stabilisation behind the cg would make if fly like and arrow if it left the water instead of becoming unstable.
@rondavison84752 жыл бұрын
Why not build the skids so they have less drag when tgoing fast and up off water, and more at lower speeds? mind jumps to vortex generators. Just simple triangles and then add shark fin curve, with more curviture and area at base tapering down to curved triangle tip, it could transition to flat then the flat would taper in from sides. a longer profile vs air will be needed also.
@bob28594 жыл бұрын
Hey James, make sure your props are made for max thrust at cruise speed, not max static thrust. It looks like yours are a relatively low pitch; you might want to switch to higher pitch props. You could even put a helicopter tail rotor mechanism on there for variable pitch! :D Edit: Also do seriously consider differential thrust for "rudder". Not dragging a surface under the water should help tremendously at high speeds.
@TrentPierceProjects4 жыл бұрын
You could drastically improve performance by shaping the main hull instead of leaving it as a semicircle. Love the videos. Can't wait to see the next update on it
@Rowan.Albright4 жыл бұрын
Wow! That's really impressive! Your projects are always so cool!
@davecooper59513 жыл бұрын
I think I would add a rear aerofoil. Variable incidence, and possibly gyro stabilised by the on-board RC system. (You can use a cheap one of these from a small quad 'copter). As the speed builds, and the trim changes, you could 'fine-tune' the trim from the transmitter. Well done, and keep up the good work. Britain needs young experimental engineers like you...
@spacebeans49854 жыл бұрын
I always love rc type channels
@droneys13484 жыл бұрын
Wow this guy, he is amazing, for me it was a massive achievement that i got a drone to fly first time, and this guy is out here beating world records, recreateing dam busters, making cool stuff, awesome. 😀
@Marcellus744 жыл бұрын
Great project and great video ! One little thing, your trailing edges are round on the side floats and the round belly of your main fuselage will not help break the water tension, it will keep being sucked by the water by negative pressure just like a venturi effect. Take a look at some real (vs RC) seaplane floats like the Piper J3 or else, side edges and trailing edge are straight and sharp. Just my 2cts as I struggled with the same matter designing my own RC seaplane floats a few years ago. Keep it up, always loved your channel :)
@HardwareMaker4 жыл бұрын
Was thinking to convert a rc car to a rc boat and was wondering how to make it really fast and then saw this video and now I know exactly how to do it! Thanks :)
@_Piers_4 жыл бұрын
I wonder if it would be possible to use a gyro/flight controller to stop the boat flipping if it started to pitch to far. I don't know if dialing back the power on the motors would help at that point or if it would already be too late.
@koalatails63914 жыл бұрын
A heavy duty servo for the rudder is needed & move the rudder to the centre behind the skeg. The skeg should be shaped to a symmetrical aero foil. This should eliminate drag without compromising efficiency. Great project! 👍
@MD80phreak4 жыл бұрын
Only those who have driven an air / fan boats know how it feels. Love the feeling they are so special to handle! I've built two, but not this big. I think you're right, this one has alot of potential!
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Lecandotnet3 жыл бұрын
Can you attach the nylon string ( fishing line) to the back for easy and safely pull it back?
@sahadewtamang23034 жыл бұрын
Nice brother👍👍👍
@gressytrey7 ай бұрын
i dont care how old these videos are they are all so good
@markvickroy67253 жыл бұрын
What is with the propeller setup? Would you not get more overall thrust if you place them facing the same direction, one to the left and one to the right of Center? I would think as is there would be a lot of thrust cancellation because of interference with the propellers being so close together in a push-pull configuration. This is just me thinking here, mind you. Most of the few airplanes that have tractor and pusher propeller setups have the propellers at opposite ends of the device not directly back-to-back.
@jwestleywilson2714 жыл бұрын
Have you considered the weight of the battery placement and your planeing issue? Maybe as on aircraft, a CG point could be looked into to help get on plane faster.
@meyerflitedesign4 жыл бұрын
Great project James! Considering the speed record edf would be a better choise as you get far more airspeed with them. Also you will probably have some issues with water splashing into the props and slowing them down
@electronics-by-practice4 жыл бұрын
Hi nice video , if you put one propeller on the left side and the other on the right side you can eliminate the boat rudder and seal the bottom .
@georgevprochazka53164 жыл бұрын
I believe you need a rear skid (flat bottom with a slight "ramp" angle ) sloping down towards the back. This way you'll get the aft out of the water @ speeds.
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke4 жыл бұрын
Could you have a weight inside that can be remotely moved back and forth towards the front, to pull the nose back down as it starts taking off? Could this be automated by some sort of vertical height accelerometer?
@sgtmajjackhawkins78874 жыл бұрын
This reminds me of the PBRs we use to take up the Mekong. I sold the parts for scrap after the war and used it to start my very own tomato empire
@moletrap2640 Жыл бұрын
Great project. My gut says your propeller stalk is set too far behind the CG and you're probably going to have to move it forward a bit. Your motor is very powerful (for top speed) and maybe pushing the rear end down way too hard?
@robinyilmaz11554 жыл бұрын
Why does it even need all that volume, like the fuselage and side pylons? Couldn't they just be flat pieces without all the extra volume that doesn't appear to do much?
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Buoyancy and stability mostly, and scope for it to be upgraded with alternative power systems. Also because I wanted it to be big.
@hooptydoo4174 жыл бұрын
When are you going to learn to bring a recovery boat?
@yucannthahvitt4 жыл бұрын
When he builds a boat that actually works he might have a recovery boat
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Built a rescue boat (that works, checkout my Dambusters video) but it’s out of action right now. Also got a manned boat for actual tests.
@abdulkader54704 жыл бұрын
It's a lot heavy boat. It have to be lighter. The floats have to be a little bit front. You need more thrust for this size of boat. Keep it up.
@jachinluttrell94044 жыл бұрын
Noice, very good design, but I think that having the propulsion set above the centre of mass is the biggest set back for models like these, I think if you can change the centre of thrust and have it only very slightly above the centre of mass would make it work much better, like the jet boat you show in the video would help, I know it helps how the boat works but at speeds your trying to get to you can use aerodynamics to help lift and/or push the boat into the water... yes it’s complicated and probably impossible with props and the model being at this scale but just a thought...
@jachinluttrell94044 жыл бұрын
P.S - any one sceptical of my theory just understand that I’m still in high school and that I have a limited knowledge of aerodynamics etc. and this is just how it makes sense in my head.
@jachinluttrell94044 жыл бұрын
P.P.S - I dabble in 3D modelling so if you want suggestions of reworked designs and they are actually feasible the I’d be happy to send some to you James... plus I’m bored so I want something to do...
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
@@jachinluttrell9404 If you're bored, try making something of your own!
@jachinluttrell94044 жыл бұрын
ProjectAir Well I’d love too, this would be my hobby of all hobby’s but the only problem is that I don’t have an appropriate work space to do it in. Also, after actually getting some sleep I now realise that some of my reasoning was wrong, but this point still stands, have something like an EDF, I have a 3D model that I made on standby (not 3D printable, just the exterior idea and will be annotated) to show what I’m thinking, more boat shaped hull and room for an EDF.
@christopping58764 жыл бұрын
Don't stop developing it. Great potential.
@srck40353 жыл бұрын
Just in Case you dont already know after a year .When printing in vase Mode you can manipulate the Wall thickness by flow rate .Im printing some airplane parts with a 0.4mm nozzle in vase Mode at 200 percent flow which gives me 0.8mm Walls . This works very good and prints with 50mms . You need to Up the temp in My Case 235 for Pla . If you Print even hotter or slower or with a Higher nozzle you can get even thicker Walls.
@MCsCreations4 жыл бұрын
Pretty fantastic work, James! 😃 Looking forward to the the improvements! 😃 Stay safe there! 🖖😊
@jesseadler34314 жыл бұрын
You deserve more subscribers. Your projects are awesome!
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Thank you ☺️
@slidewaze4 жыл бұрын
Couldn't agree more.
@Tom-jd1rm3 жыл бұрын
needs more lift in the back to push down the front?
@abdallah.alammar3 жыл бұрын
I am not getting it! why the motors on the sam line? does those 2 motors push in the same direction or each is opposite to the other one?
@robertosfield4 жыл бұрын
With two props could you not mount them side by side and use differential thrust for directional control? Side by side would also provide better efficiency than inline.
@euphplayer69414 жыл бұрын
Robert Osfield Side by side works when there is a greater distance between the to create a moment of turning. But side by side is probably better for efficiency. Even the unlimited class hydroplanes have water rudders.
@griffinballfish2 жыл бұрын
can you please tell me where you get your rocket engine firecrackers from I have got inspiration from your videos to make something myself, but I can't find any rocket engine firecrackers?
@olliefoxx71653 жыл бұрын
I love these types of builds. Wouldn't it be cool to have a real life version?
@robertwoodliff25363 жыл бұрын
Nice work. Paint finish / rattle can..........finish is improved by warming up the surface, hair drier rather hot air gun ( ie lower temperature ), and heating the paint can ( i used to do it by putting the can in a just boiled kettle , but heard that these cans can be quite explosive , even when dropped.......but heat does help move and mix the paint ) ends up giving a better finish .
@joshuaianbetito53303 жыл бұрын
You should for an engineering company bro. Your contents are legit. You are underrated, you deserve more. God Bless you always
@huskedworkz17664 жыл бұрын
What kind of epoxy do you use? im also building rc boats but dont know what proper adhesives should i use
@TheScottsawesomeart4 жыл бұрын
all epoxys r water safe
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Just some sort of Deluxe Materials 5 min epoxy would do you. :)
@huskedworkz17664 жыл бұрын
@@TheScottsawesomeart what do you guys use?
@huskedworkz17664 жыл бұрын
@@Project-Air thanks man👍
@arfyness4 жыл бұрын
Really looking forward to seeing what you do next! I agree with some others here - you'll want a stronger servo and maybe dual rudders. (I'd love to know how much control you'd have with the one that scarpered. My intuition is it might have you wanting for rudder authority.) Simpler than dual rudders, an L shaped one extending father backward would provide more authority without going terribly deep to snag on things.
@tritowns4 жыл бұрын
Make sure the edges where the boat comes up on plane sharp. Rounded edges create suction
@ARandomTroll4 жыл бұрын
bigger tail skid, dual rudder- one in water, one in the prop wash (maneuverability at low speeds), and try vase mode with a fat nozzle (say .8 at .2-.4mm layer height)
@landene82304 жыл бұрын
If you were to put small rollers or wheels on the skids would it caused less friction
@alisioardiona7274 жыл бұрын
Great video ! You should put a cone at the rear to reduce drag
@theadventuresofshellyandfr56184 жыл бұрын
Great job! love the blue bird. You will need a quarter scale steering servo for a hydroplane that size and put it inside the hull where it stays dry. use a waterproof boot and run a 440 rod to the rudder. Don’t ever swim after a boat without a lifejacket. I use a small rc retrieval boat with a fishing line attached to retrieve most of my dead boats. hardly ever need to use a rowboat. Keep up the good work brother!
@ruedogs4 жыл бұрын
Would a flat underside not ride better and with less resistance than a rounded one? Great project cant wait to see your progress
@williamscoggin15093 жыл бұрын
Maybe add a small shallow fixed position fan to the bottom of the left and right pontoon would greatly help your steering.
@MPRCBBRR4 жыл бұрын
Did you consider an air rudder? That would improve low speed steering without the need for a large (draggy) water rudder....
@hippazoid4 жыл бұрын
Here’s a crazy idea: What would motor torque differential (yaw on a quad) give you? Could it affect your turning authority by digging a pontoon (/planing the other side) in the water? Love all of your experimentation. Keep up the good work. 😁
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Interesting idea! Thanks for watching :)
@OzAndyify4 жыл бұрын
Where is the COG supposed to be for a 3 point hydrofoil? It looked a tad tail heavy. Also wondering if aero-rudder would be better. Less chance of snagging weed and maybe even less drag. Looking forward to the high speed runs!
@1grizzlyrizzo4 жыл бұрын
Looks really nice, and fast. I'd seal up that nose and go for a top hatch though, one knock to the nose and it'll just fill up. Also look out for twisting on the floats, as an isolation could rip it apart.
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Might be doing some sort of mod to the nose to secure it better in the meantime and also put enough 2L drinks bottles full of air in the hull as a backup just in case something goes seriously wrong!
@Graybear783 жыл бұрын
Good concept! I liked the endeavor. A couple of suggestions, if I may? Perhaps an air rudder instead of a water rudder. A bit more drag in the air, but less drag in the water would more than balance out. Perhaps rounded sponsons would lessen drag by rising out of the water as water pressure on the sponson increases the faster you go, including the rear sponson. Keep going with your work. Is there a continued video? Thanks.
@JadeEyedWolf4 жыл бұрын
For the rear skid, you might be able to achieve the same effect as the thrust angle vectoring you mentioned you had hoped to do with the props earlier. If the skid had a pivot point on the rear of the hull, you could control the pitch angle of the craft with a servo control.
@BlueAntec4 жыл бұрын
I know nothing about this and may have a flawed idea but what if you used blades like on an air boat? This in theory would allow you to steer the boat and/or control the trim of the airflow behind the propellers.
@girrrrrrr23 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered/wanted to have creators put up the cost of projects like this, for a couple reasons to show that you don't have to be rich to have fun, and my own pure curiosity of how much this stuff is to make.
@girrrrrrr23 жыл бұрын
Also would ducting the fans help? That or in some slicers you can use infill modifiers to change how the infill is laid out. I only mention this because you could in theory make the bottom more infill and then have the top less so it's lighter and has a lower CG
@OleZ9002 жыл бұрын
Wich laser cutter do you use for the woodwork?
@creativeplus23154 жыл бұрын
you are so good to make this video, i like it so much
@NeoFrontierTechnologies3 жыл бұрын
Would putting the rudder in the airflow behind the motors not work better ? 🤔( more like an airplane kinda )
@gryfandjane4 жыл бұрын
I’m excited about this one! It looks to have amazing potential once the glitches are worked out, and it certainly has that legendary Bluebird vibe about it. Are you going to try for the record at Coniston? Seems only fitting. ;-) Ah well, back to moping about the lack of Flite Fest...
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Was planning on going to Coniston this weekend but the boat isn't ready and the weather is going to be poor. Sometime maybe in the next month or so though!
@evangangster58084 жыл бұрын
0 Dislikes and 95 Likes This...does put a smile on my face
@waynegilchrist15964 жыл бұрын
Good job of engineering but I wonder if you might take a different tack on your steerage. Twin props in a side by side configuration instead of a tandem. This would allow a highly manuverable ship and possibly eliminate the rudder altogether. I know it might alter the performance and possibly cost you some speed but what's to prevent a side by side version of the tandem props you have? I may be all wet but I thought it worth a mention. Not being critical! Just hopefully broadening your horizons.
@fk319fk4 жыл бұрын
The first video I have seen of yours. I like your style. I have concerns about the general size and shape, but that is yours and you are working through it. You made a design choice of one propeller feeding the second, I do not see the advantage of them being inline as opposed to parallel to each other. Could you take the time to go over that design choice in a future video?
@cadensager11874 жыл бұрын
I've never seen ur vids but 1:00 minute in I already want more. Keep going strong
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words!
@sanches24 жыл бұрын
Same here, just sub'ed
@remkojerphanion46864 жыл бұрын
Me thinks the sponsons are too big and heavy, they don't need to be that tall mate. It is a fun project, and I can't wait to see how it unfolds, good luck!
@TheMarklongboard3 жыл бұрын
the planing hull, center hull should not have a taper up as it acts as an up elevator/aileron but a straight line. you can taper the above waterline though.
@BABALOOEY463 жыл бұрын
Shouldn’t the floats be an aerofoil shape? Can you stick a rocket on it? Air rudder?
@taattataattataattata3 жыл бұрын
Wow! I love ur technique. Simple sturdy
@jimmycreek4 жыл бұрын
Maybe have ride plates on the back of the front skids, lots of race boats have plates that are manually adjusted to balance the craft at full cook. Also this looks really cool and stay safe
@spodfpv59304 жыл бұрын
This is the first time I’m seeing one of your videos, and I’m definitely going to look out for more! Do you mind if I ask how you kept the balsa wood in place as the skin of the floats? Thanks!
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Just more super glue! 😊 Thanks for watching
@spodfpv59304 жыл бұрын
ProjectAir awesome, thank you!
@thomasvanmierlo64814 жыл бұрын
Crazy big. Looks awesome!!
@Damdaved4 жыл бұрын
Underrated asf!
@ericmeehan2984 жыл бұрын
Really cool project! I hope you can break that record. Regarding suggestions, did you take into account the center of gravity once all of the batteries and components are added? It looked like the tail was heavier once you added the electronics, maybe that is pulling the back down further.
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
I agree that’s the CG is a bit off. I’m going to be doing some experimentation with shifting the heavier 6s batteries around next time 🙂👍 Thanks for watching
@my_dear_friend_4 жыл бұрын
I am not sure if I would rely on a rudder in the water for a high speed boat that is designed to contact the water as little as possible. Ultimately those things are airplanes that almost fly. Rudder in air?
@Mad.Man.Marine Жыл бұрын
Great video man. That back ride plate looks like it’s pretty steeply angled. May want to round it a little so the approach angle is better.
@jimefflandt96094 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed your video and all the work you put into your boat. It takes lots of trials but you will get it. Hang in there.
@harveyjennings83014 жыл бұрын
You could get some adjustment by moving the motor assembly up and down on the vertical motor spar.
@Rick-du6xq4 жыл бұрын
I still dont understand how you only have 30K subs, you deserve so much more man
@DeliciousDeBlair4 жыл бұрын
Why did you not use a ducted fan model thruster?
@OdeeOz4 жыл бұрын
Gosh, I remember back in 1968, building an Swamp/Air Boat powered by .049 gas engine. Dad was mad when I used it to flush Geese for the holiday table, because it worked so well, and he hadn't thought of it first. LOLS
@RoroBar-k8e4 жыл бұрын
Hi, may be two rudder : One on each float ?
@john-r-edge3 жыл бұрын
Great vids. Small ask/suggestion. Please arrange playlists so that when it is played the vids come out in correct viewing order - part 1, part 2, etc.
@pixelavro4514 жыл бұрын
your channel is so professional and you deserve way more subs! nice scenery too. keep up the good work
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@lexxynubbers4 жыл бұрын
Just a sugestion - if the sponsons were V or U shaped instead of flat, would that reduce the width in contact with water, and hence drag as they rise up? I have no idea about how to calculate drag for hydroplanes , but other craft that rely on planing seem to have non-flat hulls. Edit - now that i think about it, U, and V shaped hulls are probably as much about stability, but my main point still stands.
@jonnyBgood34 жыл бұрын
Simple recovery boat, magnetic attachment arm possibly.Maybe recovery drone.
@sanches24 жыл бұрын
As you suggested - subscribed and liked;) i had the same experience not waiting for the epoxy to cure completely and rushing my airboat to a lake... how do you manage impatience ( when glueing, painting and such) ?
@mjproebstle4 жыл бұрын
excellent build!! would suggest using 2 bladed props. more efficient/more thrust than a 3 bladed prop carry on then!
@Project-Air4 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Absolutely. Unfortunately the only suitable props I could find were these. I had to find a CW 16" prop and a CCW 16" prop. I'll have another look for some soon and compare them to the 3 blades!