Do Acts & Galatians Contradict?

Supposed Bible Contradiction #33. Does Paul's account of his conversion In Galatians 1 contradict Luke's account in Acts 9?
Don't forget to help us create more videos! We need your support:
/ inspiringphilosophy
/ @inspiringphilosophy
inspiringphilo...

[@TestifyApologetics]

There is so much confirmation that Luke traveled with Paul that he probably got the story straight from Paul himself. Scholars attempts at hand waving it away based on weak pet contradictions like this is that are easily explained is pretty laughable.

[@lucidcross8282]

Nice to see you here. Your channel is increasing with your awesome videos. Keep up the good work, I hope one day I can achieve the same as you and inspiring philosophy one day. But I need to work harder.

[@pabloandres6179]

Great comment. I noticed Ehrman once said on Mythvision that even with this fix, it would destroy Paul’s chronology or something like that.

[@evenly.2529]

Synoptic problem destroys the gospels regardless.

[@-TheExposition-]

Easily explained? Did the men traveling w/ Paul see the bright light shinning all around or not? Did the men w/ Paul hear the voice of the one speaking w/ Paul yet not understand the voice or not? Did the men w/ Paul fall to the ground w/ Paul or did Paul fall alone? Does the dialogue of Jesus completely change when Paul tells Agrippa of his conversion from the dialogue of Jesus accounted in the previous two versions? Do we truly hear, contemplate and the seek to understand the words of the master or do we bow down prostrate unto the words of men? Intellectual debate can not occur among intellectually dishonest men. Is a child an intellectual? Do we truly believe we must become as humble as a child to enter into the kingdom of heaven? To convert is to conform into who he is and not make him who he's not you would agree? What if they made him who he's not yet we just do not see? How might we see if this be so? His words do hold the weight would you agree?

[@surrealpsalms]

@@evenly.2529Moronic baseless claim.

[@ericphillips8006]

The vast majority of potential contradictions can be solved by actually reading and analyzing the text.

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Yep

[@marthagirma553]

@@InspiringPhilosophy Can you make a video on nadab and abihu sin in Leviticus 10

[@evenly.2529]

No because the bible has irreconciliable contradictions

[@evenly.2529]

@@InspiringPhilosophy your religion is false.

[@marcellofunhouse1234]

@@evenly.2529 source trust me bro

[@godsgospelgirl]

I love your "'contradictions' in the Bible" series. Not only does it help in answering skeptics, but it helps honest readers of the text who get confused sometimes.

[@williamoarlock8634]

Your texts aren't confusing - just boring and contrary to reality.

[@georgenassif5777]

@@williamoarlock8634have you ever read the Bible or studied it in any meaningful way?

[@williamoarlock8634]

@@georgenassif5777 Have you ever noticed what Jesus does in the gospel fantasies Christ is the total opposite in 'the world' (reality)?

[@georgenassif5777]

@@williamoarlock8634 what does “Christ is the total opposite in the world” mean? If you are referring to miracles performed by Jesus then there is corroborated eye witness accounts in many writings like Paul’s, luke’s, etc about Jesus’ miracles like the resurrection. Or the quick conversions of many people who were previously against it to the Christian movement like Paul. If you are saying that miracles don’t happen any where else then I would refer you to stories like Our Lady of Zeitoun or other Marian apparition sightings that don’t have convincing or good explanations.

[@williamoarlock8634]

@@georgenassif5777 The sheer uselessness, hypocrisy corruption and cruelty from the 'Body of Christ' for centuries and you're trying to justify it with 'Marian apparitions'...I read about Jesus washing feet in the gospels while in the world his 'body' crushes and burns off feet for centuries...Jesus preaches in the gospel 'He who offends these little ones' and we've seen plenty of what his 'members' (of priests and preachers) in the world have been doing to 'little ones'.

[@swagg_37]

straight to the point, provided Biblical evidence and clear arguments 🔥🙏 these videos are so great!

[@evenly.2529]

there is no biblical evidence, because the bible is false.

[@williamoarlock8634]

'Biblical evidence' - now there's an oxymoron.

[@nathanielalderson9111]

Bart Erhman is one that regularly does not use charity when handling the text. But inserts his own emotional manipulations into the text, and does not let the text speak for itself. His most common favourite tool is the dual employment of arguments from silence and incredulity.

[@ChildofGod98765]

Lord only you know the burdens I face give me strength to get through this Christmas. I am a single mom and it can be hard to have everything on your shoulders. Both of my sons are autistic they require so much from me. I’m struggling to provide for them. But I keep faith even as I struggle to pay rent every month and as I struggle to buy groceries. My health is also fading due to heart disease and lupus. Jesus please help me to find strength when I am weak, hope when I am struggling, and peace in the midst of chaos. I have faith God will provide. I believe in miracles. 😢

[@ythatesfacts]

This reminds me of when Dr. Mike licona made this point with the Guy version (short and to the point) and the girl version (very detailed and takes a while to get to the point and sounds like a roller coaster).

[@claytoniusdoesthings9598]

Now I wanna know what Paul was doing in the Arabian desert. There are verses in some of his writings that could suggest that the Damascus Road wasn't the only place Jesus appeared to Paul. "For I pass on to you what I received from the Lord Himself." If he spent that time in the desert getting Divine Insight from Christ himself, that would be absolutely wild.

[@aussierose9015]

It would make Sence since it was custom for prophets to go fast and pray in the desert after being called as is clear with many old testament prophet's and even Jesus after his baptism

[@Toronado2]

I think if I actually SHOWED you where Paul LIED, You would have a more credible argument. So let me help you. Jesus says quote; Jhn 16:12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Jhn 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. So IF we are to Believe Jesus, then we are to believe that He will not be revealing any of these "MANY THINGS" and "ALL TRUTHS". But Paul says that ; Gal 1:12 I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ. As you can see clearly that Paul LIES on Jesus by claiming He was Taught By Jesus Christ, when Jesus says He will NOT be teaching anything new anymore. So it's Clear that Paul LIED. And Confessed to that LIE so that People will come to believe in the "TRUTH" of God. Oh, And Paul also asks; Rhetorical or Not, "Why is he condemned as a Sinner?" Christians should answer that "Rhetorical" question. Was Paul a SINNER or NOT? Paul seems to be conflicting here or doesn't believe that He IS a Sinner. What do Christians think? Is He a Sinner or NOT?

[@Panwere36]

This is why reading the Bible chronologically makes a huge leap in destroying these "contradiction" arguments.

[@M.O.N.K.3]

These are timeless underrated gems of videos

[@captainoofmerica2478]

It seems so often like the “contradictions” come up when someone approaches the text while TRYING to find contradictions, and that they almost always fade when someone approaches the text with a more unbiased analytical lense.

[@BisthunderMonakanisa]

This is very helpful for our faith. Thank you sir Michael sir!

[@rosstemple7617]

Synecdoche refers to a literary device in which a part of something is substituted for the whole (as hired hand for "worker"), or less commonly, a whole represents a part (as when society denotes "high society"). “Look deer in the field,” could mean one or many. Learning Synecdoche helps you also understand how Jesus Christ was three days in the tomb but yet not 72 hours.

[@AnHebrewChild]

but Jesus says, For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. 3 days & 3 nights. I understand synecdoche but you'd have to do more than just appeal to it as a thing, you'll have to demonstrate why that convention of language _should_ apply here. Also, where are you getting from the Bible that Jesus was buried on Friday night?

[@Anonymous-yy7ur]

I want to say thank you for making these videos they are very informative I use a lot of your videos in my Bible studies I had to say you should be a teacher... Keep up the good work 👍🏻 God bless 🙏

[@andys3035]

Excellent work! May your Christmas be filled with the love of Christ. ☦️🙏🏼

[@patrickhurley7029]

I just want to share something- before I found this channel I was having serious doubts about Paul. I watched videos which made Paul out to be the bad guy or just somehow not authentic. Around this time, right before I found this channel- I prayed to Jesus, essentially "can you show up in a dream and explain to me your faith because I don't trust the Bible- and whatever you show me I will follow". So I go into a dream about a lady, wearing clothes of Jesus's time and she opened a book and these beautiful letters start pouring out. And she is smiling and explaining that this is what I should follow. And I argued with her and said "you know, I just really need to talk to Jesus". After all, Jesus was teaching all these people in the distance. I woke up because I was arguing so much. I fell back into the dream and again, I began arguing because I wanted to speak to Jesus directly. In the third dream I calmed down and was just happy to be back in that place. I was walking with women in this beautiful place, perfect weather, sun was setting. Then I see an alter with a book on it and Jesus is standing to my left facing me. And I was speechless. Jesus said "Paul, can you please give our friend here a lesson?". Paul agrees and Jesus walks off into the hills, singing what I believed to be a Psalm. Paul goes to the book and pats it and says "this is the book of life, this is what you are to follow". He opens it and again, these beautiful letters start pouring out- to me they look Ancient Greek- but they were so vibrant, full of color and of life. They poured out and splashed like water, but they stayed in their letter form. The trees soaked them up and the fish were literally following them upstream- and you see the fish popping out of the water following them. Paul says "do you see how the trees soak up the words of the book of life without questioning them? And do you see how the fish are following the words of the book of life upstream, without effort? You are to do the same". He said "do you have any more questions?". I said "no" and he smiled, and as he closed the book he put three fingers in the air and did a sign and those beautiful letters poured out one last time, he looks up and does a sign- it reminded me of priests at church. He walks after Jesus into the hills, he stops turns around and asks if Im coming, and says I wouldnt want to miss the celebrations. I just remember getting really curious and excited and I began walking into the hills after them. I also like to add this because it was my favorite part, but I would say you know- it was my dream and it spoke directly to me- and I always liked the idea of Jesus being brown skin, skinny, humble- you know? Apparently he had no features that even distinguished him from anyone else in the crowd. When I saw Jesus in my dream- he was very skinny, dark brown skin, beard, brown robe and hood, and he had a hunch in his back. He was carrying a sheep herders stick but he also used it as a support for his back. It was so beautiful to see Him that way- I'm not saying it's accurate, but it was perfect for me. Also, my favorite part is I was wearing a robe too and it was very comfortable.

[@billwhite1603]

Love your channel. Helped this 63 year old man and 55 year Christian. Best of luck and thank you. But I have to say I cannot watch 2-3 hour Q&A or over an hour long theory. Maybe one day you could edit and make smaller videos from Q&A by subject similar to Prager does some times on youtube.

[@ramonfabular1022]

I just can't believe people are questioning the Word of God and putting up ridiculous arguments. In life, we only have 2 choices. You are for God or against Him. There is always things that we encounter in the Bible that looks contradicting as we are growing in the knowledge of Him. But with the Holy Spirit's guidance and strong faith of Jesus, there is always enlightment along the journey. Keep up the faith in Jesus, our Lord and Saviour.🥰☝🙏🤟💞

[@vegadog3053]

I have heard the same Larry Bird stories told by the same people many different ways. In fact, if you yputube Dominique Wilkins telling a Larry Bird Story, he changesthe specific details every time, yet they all match the footage close enough to understand the perspective. So it is with those telling their own stories and/or compiling then like Luke. We don't have to discard one narrative just because it didn't match the way the first hand ( Paul) decided to tell it in a letter that was focused on pastoral correction.

[@chancylvania]

Yay more supposed Bible contradictions! I always like IPs answers cause they’re well thought out and researched

[@VibeTribeSlowed]

I recently went to a museum and have been struggling with the idea of millions of years passing, the ice ages, and Genesis. Could you make a video explaining ancient archaeology and the Bible creation accounts

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

kzbin.info/aero/PL1mr9ZTZb3TUeQHe-lZZF2DTxDHA_LFxi&si=Q3p6bDr7Yz3xfO7I

[@josuelainey]

This is amazing

[@dlayn208]

Please do a video on prayer and studies on how prayer doesn’t work according to those studies. I like your videos!

[@Kuudere-Kun]

Arabia was also a flexible term back then which Damascus could be considered a part of.

[@ronallens6204]

Paul also considers the troubles he endured the same scars given to Jesus in His trials

[@georgcantor8859]

Thanks

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

Thank you for the donation

[@macwade2755]

Merry Christmas InspiringPhilosophy!

[@KennethSaul]

I'd like to see a similar video about the discrepancies between Paul and James.

[@marius5_]

Mike Jones, you are a gem 💎

[@happydays310]

He had received new teachings from the Lord Jesus Christ because he is a vessel of the Lord Acts 9 15kjv. 1 Corinthians 15 1-4kjv is our Saving Gospel. Please look into rightly dividing the Word of Truth, 2 Timothy 2 15kjv.

[@FAITHFULsk8r]

Well done

[@livewireOrourke]

I personally think that Paul would win an MMA fight. But both lose to Francis Ngannou.

[@christophersnedeker]

Can you do a contradiction video about Ecclesiastes "the dead know nothing" vs Samuel's ghost telling Saul he was going to die? I reconciled it that through necromancy Samuel wasn't fully dead.

[@dlayn208]

Hi IP, I’ve been watching your videos and have been finding them helpful in my quest to answer my doubts about my faith. I have a question/video idea for you. I recently watched this video called “Why Science gives more Purpose than Religion” and I would really like to hear your thoughts about the video and the general idea. Thanks for your service!

[@legolasfanboy6712]

⁠​​⁠@inspiringphilosophy can you do a video on theistic evolution? I’d love to hear more from you regarding the creation of the earth.

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqjRlqWCbbJkpqcsi=wE7CY5W1YbpfQIb3

[@JacobGosnell-el5ku]

Hi IP, could you do a video about modern day miracles? Also it would be good if you got Caleb jackson to do it with you.

[@HisLivingStone241]

Question: IP, I was watching your new case on the memory behind the Gospels, but how do we Christians make sense of the non-impactful variations in the Gospel (such as the kingdom of God vs kingdom of heaven) with the promise of Jesus in John 14:26? I know it may seem simple, but I just want to be sure.

[@SeekTheCross]

I don't really see the contradiction.

[@Wicked_Weavile0808]

Hey IP, what's the best argument against Isaiah 53 being about Israel and not the Messiah

[@mysotiras21]

That's easy. Israel was NOT sinless, not ever! but the Servant in Isaiah 53 was.

[@johnxina8954]

Can you do a video about 1 John 5:7?

[@evenly.2529]

Late forgery. Erasmus omitted it from the first & second editions of his bible but was pressured to add it to his Novum Testamentum omne in 1522.

[@danaleanne38]

Why do you think he never went to the apostles after his covertion story?

[@JaidenTamayo]

I know that you have done a lot of formal debates but you should do a formal debate on if cereal is soup 🤣just for fun

[@jotaguai]

@inspiringphilosophy Hello I love your videos! Not here to discuss/debate or get an apologetics response, but can you please share on Isaac (Abraham's son) and how he managed to "qualify" into Hebrews 11's Hall Of Faith? I know by faith he blessed Esau and Jacob -- but is that it? Please expound, also, by extension, on Isaac's actual contribution to the famous 3 patriarchs of faith Abraham Isaac Jacob. His story seems lacklustre. Thanks!

[@christopherstodj2946]

Please guys , I need help ! I really do ! If anyone can please help me with a serious matter between the different stations during the exodus… Number 33 ! Some of the stations in deuteronomy are not mentioned!!! Is it the proof of contradiction??

[@nothingnothing7958]

Hey IP Michael heiser thinks Psalm 82:6 is a divine council of non humans but God calls them " sons of the most high" when Hebrews 1:5 says God never called a angel that. And Jesus identifies the heavenly host as Angel's in Mathew 26:53.

[@RedCloudGawdian]

Well the word angel does just mean messenger, in both the Greek and the Hebrew. Jesus in Matthew 26 53 identifies angels as part of the heavenly host, but he never once says the heavenly host is comprised solely of messengers. Hebrews 1 5 is actually a reference to 2 Samuel 7 14 and Psalm 89 26 referencing how Christ is the king that was promised from the line of David. It also calls Christ the firstborn yet any true trinitarian knows this is poetic hyperbole for Jesus isn't a created being. I don't think any of these passages contradict Dr Heiser's view of the Divine Council. We can't just take passages in isolation, we have to view them in the context of the text and considering the writer of Hebrews was writing directly to the Jewish community, him referencing Christ through the Davidic line makes more contextual sense, especially when coupled with the Gospel of Matthew also being written for such an audience. Hope I could help. Shalom ✌🏿

[@nothingnothing7958]

@@RedCloudGawdian ok so if this divine council are not humans or Angel's but are below God then what are they?

[@RedCloudGawdian]

@@nothingnothing7958 I think you're looking at it the wrong way. Rather than asking what are they, you should be asking what are angels. Angel is simply a job title. If you called me a writer, you'd be describing my occupation not the fact that I'm a British born human male. So when you say angel, you're just referring to a job title. Really they are the heavenly host, the divine council, the bene elohim. Whilst I think Dr Heiser presents excellent evidence, I myself am not married to this particular Biblical view. I do agree with it but it's definitely open for interpretation and could refer to human kings. I personally need to study the texts in both Hebrew and Greek more to form a more concrete opinion on the matter. But the fact remains that angels are not any specific type of being, its merely a job title, like carpenter, plumber or scribe.

[@nothingnothing7958]

@@RedCloudGawdian then why did Jesus said legions of Angel's. In the Bible there are only a few angels who are actually messengers.

[@nothingnothing7958]

@@RedCloudGawdian I think i have it, your right a messenger is still a messenger even if their not currently acting as a messenger we can view the excess messengers as reserves. I think the divine council members are cherubim or mabye seraphim. I tried to find out what type of angel Gabriel is because he is the type who is never called a Son Of God and who Jesus would have summoned. I'm pretty sure a Arch Angel is below a Cherubim.

[@planteruines5619]

could you please do a video on appollonius of tyanha ...?

[@mikeambs]

To summarize: 'Here's a thing that's kinda funny... and in any other circumstance, would seem fishy... but! If you just 🤷‍♂️ ya know, imagine it's nothing, then it's nothing'. Definitely a level of scrutiny that Michael would apply to other religious texts 🙃

[@braindeadfaith]

If you're "charitable", really, really "charitable", then it all almost makes perfect sense.

[@JM-jj3eg]

"and in any other circumstance, would seem fishy" Where exactly did he say that?

[@braindeadfaith]

@@JM-jj3eg He didn't "exactly" say that... hence the ' instead of ", as well as the "to summarize" 🤷‍♂️

[@Fassnight]

Well, he doesn't just wave the two texts away and say, "It's the Bible, so it's okay." He actually just shows that this type of time shortening is consistent with Luke. Acts covers a span of several years, so it's not like Luke needed or intended to give every time-frame in detail.

[@mikeambs]

@@Fassnight It would literally have taken Luke two extra words to be accurate 🤷‍♂️ But sure, next time someone gives a suspiciously condensed version of events, I'm just gonna use this approach to "the truth". Look, either way, it's not a big deal. The Bible is full of weird contradictions... none of them are that mind-blowing when considering it's a random collection of human literature. I care far more about the "synoptic" parts of the bible... ie, the parts that copy (word for word) 80% of earlier work yet are still somehow "independent attestation" 🙃

[@flyingscotsman6835]

Hello I’ve come here to ask how can I know for certain that my faith in Christ is sound, like my mind agrees with both the logic of those that dismiss the Bible and those that affirm it’s message that contains such beauty but my heart is screaming for it to be true can someone please just provide me a means to understand

[@Gabriel-uq6iq]

Yes, they do. Next.

[@austintucker394]

Hey, brother. I know this question might be something you would expect to hear from mormons or about mormons. However, there are those outside the mormon church who believed this too. And so I wanted your thoughts on it. there are those who say that after his ascension into heaven, Jesus came here to ancient America. And did for the native american indians what he did for the folks in israel. What do you think?

[@TheRastacabbage]

What do you think? And more importantly, why?

[@austintucker394]

@@TheRastacabbage I just want mike's opinion that's all

[@TheRastacabbage]

I guess you don't think

[@BongBing11]

There's really no proof of that.

[@TheRastacabbage]

There's no proof of the trinity

[@TheComicbookguy78]

There's absolutely NO contradictions in the Bible!

[@jefferydriggers523]

Do we have to keep the Torah? I.E food, moral and .

[@Chemosh418]

It’s really sad the people who think they can refute Paul wasn’t a liar. Romans 3:7 is proof he is a liar he admits it. the only way one could refute this is explain why the phrase :” if the truth of god has increased through my lie,” to “someone may argue?”

[@JM-jj3eg]

If he's honestly to admit he's a liar, that proves he's honest.

[@Chemosh418]

@@JM-jj3eg you can’t be honest unless you lie.

[@JM-jj3eg]

@@Chemosh418 I didn't say that :)

[@Chemosh418]

@@JM-jj3eg I guess my points proven :)

[@Chemosh418]

@@JM-jj3eg you the difference between honesty and truth?

[@bilal535]

I asked you about transcendental argument and you said that you don't use it. Why?

[@evenly.2529]

the transcendental is 100% a solid argument. i actually picked it up from a very astute christian (who is a friend of mine).

[@bilal535]

@@evenly.2529 are you trolling bcs I see you are writing here that the Christianity is false.😄

[@evenly.2529]

@@bilal535 Nah, im not. the transcendental argument is good.

[@bilal535]

@@evenly.2529 so what is your religion then?

[@evenly.2529]

@@bilal535 Islam.

[@Ezekiel365]

BODY OF CHRIST AKA THE CHURCH (Revelation 21:22) And I saw no "TEMPLE" therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb ARE the "TEMPLE" of it (Revelation 11:1-2) And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure "the TEMPLE OF GOD" and the altar, and "THEM" that worship "THEREIN" but the court which is "without" the TEMPLE leave out, and measure it NOT for it is GIVEN unto the "GENTILES" (👆 gentiles can not enter the temple aka the body of Christ - they can not be apart of the church as it's written) (Acts 7:37-38) This is that Moses, which said (unto) the children of ISRAEL a prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of (your) "BRETHREN" like unto me; him shall ye hear this is he, that was (in the) "CHURCH" (in the) "WILDERNESS" with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with "OUR FATHERS" 👆the church has always been and will always be the ethnic bloodline Israelites - as it's written

[@noelmartin2335]

even if Bart Erhman stayed a Christian, he would have become a young Earth creationist. Atleast that is how i think he understands the biblical text "literally."

[@trentitybrehm5105]

nice

[@stophreebs]

Slap!

[@Chemosh418]

A Christian just said: If paul is being honest about being a liar , he’s honest. If he was honest why is he asking why he’d still judged a sinner?

[@deezy6984]

Yea yea yea… Paul is a joke… I’m still waiting on yall to prove Jesus is god!

[@gioarevadze2703]

like

[@jncon8013]

It’s amazing that someone so well-educated would make such a foolish argument Edit: Bart Ehrman, of course. Never IP 😤

[@residuejunkie4321]

*The King James Bible **_was_** at one time a literary masterpiece without blemish. What I mean is there were no spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in it. I have a short film in my playlist on how that was acheived. Now, they're on every page! And there are MANY word switches too! Satan has **_supernaturally_** attacked it more than any other translation, but all of them in every language have been destroyed in the fulfillment of prophecy! Plus all concordances, encyclopedias, dictionaries, history books, the oldest manuscripts and the Dead Sea scrolls have been miraculously changed to match!* *Not every word, Satan is too smart for that and he understands that rats won't eat pure poison so .05% is added to 99.95% corn. The rats love it because they can't taste the poison ... and perish for lack of knowlege! If you ever needed to obey God's commandment to ''prove all things'' and investigate something, this is it!!!* *Our Father said to "prove all things" and you better obey Him on this thing especially. I have an exceptional memory, I remember my third birthday party and can draw an accurate picture of my baby stroller. I'm 70, was saved when I was 10 and **_had been_** reading only the **_exact same copy_** of the King James bible since 1961. (I am not a king James onlyist, but now I'm glad I never read any others or I might not have noticed the changes as soon.) I memorized many scriptures out of it over the years and I absolutely **_know_** that the word **_demons_** used to be all through it. But today that word is not anywhere in there! It was replaced with **_devils._** And the only place I've ever read the word **_wineskins_** was in my bible, but it's not in it any more either. It was replaced with **_bottles._** And now **_unicorns, easter, matrix, castles, damsels, stuff, corn, colleges, banks, employment, schools, missles, tires, mufflers, manifolds, engines, highways, suburbs, pavement, presidents, doctors, pilots, sheriffs, beer, dumb ass, India, Spain, Italy, ferryboats, couches_** and lots of other words are in my bible that I never saw in it my whole life! Many of these words are anachronisms (they didn't even exist in 1611!) It never talked about men with milk in their breasts or fathers nursing babies either, but now it does! Isaiah 11:6 used to say the **_lion_** shall lie down with the lamb, not the **_wolf_** shall also dwell with the lamb! Lion represents Jesus and wolf is associated with Satan! There are 15 films in my playlist will show you plenty of undeniable "residue" showing that ''wolf'' has replaced "Lion". (Residue is what they call all the things Satan missed as he was changing our world.) Luke 17:34 used to say "two shall be in one bed, one shall be taken and the other one left", but now it says "two **_men_** shall be in one bed.......! And the following verse said "two women shall be grinding at the mill together......" and now it just says "two women shall be **_grinding together_** ......! So now the bible makes it sound like some homosexuals are going to be ''raptured"! BTW **_nobody's going to be "raptured" until after the tribulation. The Wrath of God follows._* But *this is the BIGGIE,* in Luke 19:27 it has Jesus saying "And those mine enemies that would not that I should reign over them, bring hither and *SLAY THEM BEFORE ME!"* It did say _eshew_ them away! This change makes Christians sound like radical extremists!! *Millions of Christians will be killed because of this verse!!!* And I know that this is a parable, but the king Jesus was talking about was Himself, the King of Kings! The film titled *Satan's Agents and Doctrines of Demons* which is in my playlist is just about this verse, and is the most important video most of you have ever seen. (It has Chuck Missler and Chuck Lawson in it!) *I memorized the Lord's prayer as a boy because Jesus told us to say it, and I have said it tens of thousands of times, and it absolutely did not say **_which_** art in heaven, it said **_who_** art in heaven, it didn't say **_in earth,_** it was **_on earth._** And it now says forgive us our **_debts_** instead of our **_trespasses!!!_* *God has sent His strong delusion to all of the people that never received the love of the truth! What's scary is, so far that appears to be almost all believers! This incredible phenomenon they're calling the Mandela effect is absolutely real, but it should actually be called the Daniel 7:25 effect because that's where God said He would give the Antichrist power to do this, (''change times and laws''). I first became aware of some of the bible changes in 2014 before I ever had a computer or had heard of the Mandela effect. But since 2016 I've watched many hundreds of videos on the subject, and saved some of the best and most important ones for proving your bible has been changed and pointing out all the places this was talked about in end time prophecies that we had previously misinterpreted in my playlist which you can see by 👉 typing into KZbin (PROOF OF BIBLE CHANGE RESIDUE JUNKIE)* 👈 *By the time you have seen all these films which point out all the misinterpreted prophecies being fulfilled **_supernaturally_** you will have grown MUCH closer to Jesus the never changing Word of God and your faith will be 1,000% stronger ... GUARANTEED!!!!!!!* *Even though I will no longer read any bible, (unless Jesus changes them back), I continue to study what God's word said by seeing what scriptures have been changed with proof of what was originally written. I urge you all to do the same, while you still can, because when the lights go out, all we'll have then is hard copies of the bible Satan wants us reading! At that point Amos **8:12** will be fulfilled where it says we will no longer be able to find His words anywhere again.* *This is without question the biggest and most important event since the day of Pentecost! When you see absolute proof that the miraculous fulfillment of end time prophecies are happening with your own eyes, and how close we are to our Savior's return, it's the most faith strengthening and exciting thing that you've ever experienced!* *God bless you all!!!* ❤✝️💪🏻

[@residuejunkie4321]

kzbin.info/aero/PLOTw4zBND_NPf66nKUONLoe2MNFLb5LQr

[@deprogrammershepherd1234]

💯🎯

[@joshw6562]

You were doing so well right up until "without blemish" and then you boarded the crazy train headed straight off a cliff. You should really read "From the translators to the reader" preface of the 1611... The people who compiled it KNEW there would be corrections. en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Preface#:~:text=The%20Translators%20of%20the%20Bible,rule%20and%20reign%20over%20us.

[@blusheep2]

Oh no! it said "which art" instead of "who art." Do you think that maybe you are getting a bit to legalistic here?

[@residuejunkie4321]

@@blusheep2 *Tell Jesus that at the Gate and see what HE says...LOL!* 🐷👋👉🔥

[@spacedogsbackyardastronomy8274]

You people will hold on to anything just to believe this falsehood. But just remember that when we stand before God almighty on the Day of Judgement YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!!!!!!!!

[@asphilosophy2430]

Two points I would make are that Luke (or the author of the Gospel of Luke) almost certainly didn't write the Book of Acts, and secondly Paul of Tarsus was a false apostle and deceiver so what he says is irrelevant to a true Christian. If fact, Christians would do well to simply reject anything Paul has to say about any matter.

[@alexamg9491]

Source please??

[@andrewclemons8619]

Youre altogether too "charitable" with the texts in my opinion. Nevermind if Paul condradicts Luke . Paul condradicts Jesus. In matters too numerous to list here. He violates the son of man prophecy(no private appearences) he says the law is done away with Jesus says not a jot nor tittle shall fall from the law until heaven and eart pass away. Pauls says its permissable to eat meat sacrifice to idols. Jesus says its not 3 times in the book of Revelations and James says you cant in acts 15. Paul says Jesus had the "appearence" of being a man. Which matches message of the antichrist in 1John 4 2. Paul advocates lying for the gospel where as Jesus had no guile found in his mouth. Paul says God Doesnt live in temples made with human hands Jesus says he does. Paul claims were saved by Faith Alone Jesus says we will be judged by our works(matt 16:27) James expressly says were not saved by faith alone (James 2 24) Pauls says there are many teachers and that he is like a "father" Jesus says call no man teacher accept for Jesus. He says call no man father because One is your Father in Heaven.

[@-TheExposition-]

Do Paul's conversion stories all contradict themselves? Yes. Does the dialogue of Jesus greatly change in the last account of Paul's conversion story when it is told to Agrippa by Paul? Yes. Does Paul say In Romans verse 7 "If through my lie causes glory to be given to God then why am I still judged as a sinner?" Yes. Does Paul say in 2 Cor 2:16 "I was careful that I was not a burden to you and being the crafty man that I am I tricked you w/ guile."? Yes. Does guile mean lies? Yes. Does trickery mean lies? Yes. Do we have a case here where Paul twice admits he lies and where his conversion story also does not add up? Obviously we do and these are but two of many biblical examples of his falseness. The Bible is a test. Learn the parable of the sower.

[@mysotiras21]

BS.

[@-TheExposition-]

@@mysotiras21 You can't refute this truth and won't. In fact I bet you won't even try. Now cry

[@mysotiras21]

@@-TheExposition-, what truth??? You've simply repeated a package of lies. Your translations of the verses you cite are outright BS; I read Greek, so I know this. You can't substantiate ANYTHING you said in your original comment.

[@blusheep2]

Its important that when you quote a verse as a proof verse that you read the verse and read it in context. Also, read it slowly with the purpose of understanding it and making an honest objection if there is an objection to be made. The chapter is a list of questions that have been asked and he answers. He isn't making a statement for himself. He is repeating a question that has been asked. This is seen from verse 1 of Romans 3... vs1 question = Then what advantage does the Jew have? Or what is the benefit of circumcision? vs2 answers = Great in every respect. First, that they were entrusted with the actual words of God. vs3 question = If some did not believe, their unbelief will not nullify the faithfulness of God, will it? vs4 answer = Far from it! Rather, God must prove to be true, though every person be found a liar, as it is written: “SO THAT YOU ARE JUSTIFIED IN YOUR WORDS, AND PREVAIL WHEN YOU ARE JUDGED.” vs5 question = But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? vs6 answer = Far from it! For otherwise, how will God judge the world? vs7 question = But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner? vs8 answer = And why not say (just as we are slanderously reported and as some claim that we say), “Let’s do evil that good may come of it”? Their condemnation is deserved. vs9 question = What then? [fn]Are we better than they? vs9 answer = Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; Paul is following a reasoning which leads to his conclusion. He is not claiming to have lied about anything. Why would he? What kind of man would tell everyone, "Hey I'm lying to you." For more contextual proof, look at the context of "lie." That is found in verse 4 which answers the question in vs 3. He equates unbelief with liars. So the liar is one who does not believe, and therefore probably says that its untrue. It would be like calling an atheist a liar because he spreads falsehoods about God. So when Paul follows the reasoning in the questions to verse 7 and say "through my lie the truth of God abounds," he is talking about unbelief. Hes saying if through his unbelief, God abounded in His glory then why would he still be judged. Paul obviously isn't in disbelief about God. So whatever sources are telling you that Paul is calling himself a liar, they are not good sources and you should look for others.

[@-TheExposition-]

@@mysotiras21 You can read Greek until the cow jumps over the moon. Yet you can not deny that in once instance of Paul conversion the men w/ Paul see the bright light flashing all around yet do not hear the voice speaking w/ Paul. Yet in another account do hear the voice speaking w/ Paul while not understanding it and not seeing the bright light flashing all around. While in one account the men w/ Paul falling to the ground w/ Paul. And in another only Paul falling of the ground by himself. A contradiction in Greek is still a contradiction in English. And just the same as it's written in the text which I did not write yet merely accurately relay, Paul account before Agrippa he most absolutely changes Jesus dialogue drastically from the other two accounts dialogue. Which is why this point of contention still after over 2000 years is still being made. Because it's valid, very. The only words twisted are that of Paul's. You just lack the intellectual honesty to admit it. This is because your are proud. Religiously proud that is. And anyone w/ a lick of brain power can see this. Even if they be religiously proud themselves. And because this is the case you as well as all have but one way out of this point which is to be intellectually dishonest. Since you speak Greek in and Romans 8:3 says "Jesus came in the likeness of human flesh" might you tell me what homomati means? Do you agree that John says and the word became flesh? Is there a difference in "likeness of human flesh" and "becoming flesh" in Greek? Remember, you're the one that jumped off by getting in your emotions and not using your mind. Therefore it's fair game that I taunted for being emotional. You may concede defeat.

[@Polimuni]

Bible contradicts itself in pretty much everything. 🤷‍♂

[@evenly.2529]

fr

[@mysotiras21]

Talk is cheap, peanut. PROVE that the Bible contradicts itself. SHOW U your EVIDENCE, or have the grace to be quiet.

[@Polimuni]

@@mysotiras21 mmm... nope ☺

[@mysotiras21]

@@Polimuni , wow! Great "argument" - NOT!!! Contradictions are NOT valid arguments, peanut. Tell me, did you ever finish grade school?

[@blusheep2]

@@mysotiras21 Don't call them "peanut." Its condescending and builds walls.

[@cnhhnc]

No contradictions in the Bible? Then no apologists necessary, no! Merry X-mas to everyone, believe what you will! But, most importantly, just do some good in the world and be tolerant and compassionate. The rest? We'll never agree about some things! Reality is too diverase and complex for that small primate brain.

[@blusheep2]

I think what you say is true but the question, "Does God exist," is arguably the greatest question ever asked and if the answer is "Yes," arguably the greatest answer ever given. We shouldn't take the question flippantly because its a difficult one or because there are complex opinions.

[@ashirtthatjusthaspantswrit3806]

I would think that two people telling the same story at two different times to two different audiences would tell it slightly differently. The same person telling the same story at different times to different people is also going to have some differences in their story.

[@mysotiras21]

Oh for crying out loud, skeptics! Paul did MANY things after his conversion! You are merely ASSUMING that two of his actions happened immediately after his conversion, and thus there is a contradiction. Give me a break! How desperate these clowns are to discredit the Bible! Merry Christmas, IP. And thank you.

[@cubaj8723]

Paulogia recently released a video in response to your video about the accuracy of Gospel authorship and its attribution to the traditional authors. Your video really helped me with my faith and I was wondering if you might make a response video. Thanks for what you do and God Bless.

[@InspiringPhilosophy]

We will, there were so many clear problems in it.

[@cubaj8723]

@@InspiringPhilosophy thanks I really appreciate that. Faith is hard but it’s made much easier with men out there such as yourself. Thanks again and I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas.

[@evenly.2529]

Traditional authorship is untenable in 2023.

[@alexamg9491]

​@@evenly.2529but was it in the first century, this is pretty irrelevant as the culture is not the same, i don't see why multiples traditions all stating the same thing should be doubted in the first century

[@evenly.2529]

@@alexamg9491 no it wasn't in the first century, the gospels were only attributed to their respective authors MUCH later on (2nd century ce) and the earliest attestation to them by people like Justin Martyr omitted the gospel titles ''kata'', rather calling them ''the memoirs of the apostles''. The designation ''kata'' is irregular, because works in antiquity never said ''according to''.

[@deadchid1081]

Hey Ip, Theres this youtuber named ESOTERICA Maybe you've already made videos on him or not, but one his biggest video is one of those pantheon evolution to monotheism things : ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5WupKdur8qbY7c ) This is a topic that has been really confusing. I have watched your videos about Yahweh emerging from a pantheon (like the one with Pastor Kyle Bailey), some of the israels monotheism vids, but this guy brings up claims that I personally haven't really seen much about . What are your thoughts on the supposed earlier mentionings of Yahweh? Like in the egyptian inscriptions for example. or that yehud coin supposedly representing Yahweh. if you've already covered these, then dont worry about (and if you could please tell me where,) thank you!

[@Μύρων-β7τ]

Great work man. Congratulations.

[@JoyahHunchak-hu1kr]

I have a question, what does the phrase "made according to there kinds" mean in genesis,,I heard it said that this contradics evolution,,,,I personally believe in evolution but I'm just wondering what to say to someone who says this?

[@TheRastacabbage]

Evolution isn't a thing

[@devondeswardt6239]

Most of these claims are actually so petty. You’d think qualified scholars would be able to see the weaknesses in the arguments they are proposing and either look elsewhere or simply hold their tongues

[@Palhairroblox]

Claims by IP?

[@devondeswardt6239]

@@Palhairroblox no, sorry, I see now how that was unclear 🙈 He has a whole series of these vids where he addresses supposed contradictions and in most of the ones I’ve watched the claims of contradiction are a bit silly. Still super glad he takes the time to clear them up!

[@Palhairroblox]

@@devondeswardt6239 alright

[@evenly.2529]

Debate with these scholars or get your favourite apologist to debate with one of these scholars and we'll see how well your friend holds up 🤣

[@devondeswardt6239]

@@evenly.2529 I have watched many debates exactly like that. The only time I’ve ever seen the Bible not hold up is when it’s misquoted or mistranslated. IP also has many debates online and he’s always done pretty well

[@phabegger1]

Hello. The Bible project is immensely popular with something like 3 million youtube subscribers. Yet Tim Mackie (lead creator of the Bible Project), denounces substitutionary atonement in a number of his sermons. Would you please do a review of Tim Mackies faulty theology? Thanks, Pete

[@tissosweet....8638]

Hey IP. Can you make a video about Jesus's birth? It seems Matthew and Luke contradict themselves when it comes to the birth of Jesus. Some say he was born in Nazareth. Please help me out.

[@carolinamay8328]

Galatians also leaves out the blindness. You're adding all sorts of things without having scholarly evidence.

[@ashergoney]

First Walls Of Jericho or Solomon's Temple 2 Sides Of A Coin , Coins Have 3 Like Some Lost Land Known As TYR

[@JustHuman87]

Please do a debate with Dan McClellan or at least debate his shorts/videos

[@midimusicforever]

They are consistent with each other!

[@Floofperwinklearcher]

it's because of my love of God I bought a study niv bible ( inspiringphilosophy thank you for educating us about God, Jesus, Gospels, philosophy, and biblical facts. )

[@thepyramidschemepodcast]

@InspiringPhilosophy You should do a video debunking the things that GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic has said about the New Testament canon and the “other” gospels.

[@Servant44]

🙏 We must go and preach [repentance] And [remission of sins] Among All nations and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. Luke 24:47 KJV - Believe [for your faith will save you] I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for [if ye believe not] that I am he, ye shall [die in your sins.] John 8:24 KJV - To give knowledge of salvation [by the remission of "our" sins] To give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the [remission of their sins,] Luke 1:77 KJV - Receive [remission of sins] when we are converted To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name [whosoever believeth] [in him] shall [receive] [remission of sins.] Acts 10:43 KJV - Confession of sin [confess your sins, everyday] If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to [forgive us our sins,] and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 1 John 1:9 KJV - [Remission of sins] from water baptism Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be [baptized] every one of you in the [name of Jesus Christ] for the [remission of sins,] and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Acts 2:38 KJV - Have charity [to have compassion] And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall [cover the multitude of sins.] 1 Peter 4:8 KJV - Love [to love thy neighbor as thyself] Hatred stirreth up strifes: but [love covereth all sins.] Proverbs 10:12 KJV - Convert sinner from his error of sin [convince someone of their error, like we were convinced] Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall [hide a multitude of sins.] James 5:20 KJV - Endure [predestined are those that endure until the end and do not die in sin] And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that shall [endure unto the end,] the same [shall be saved.] Mark 13:13 KJV - Sincere turn from practice of sin [or All will likewise perish] I tell you, Nay: but, [except ye repent,] ye shall [all likewise perish.] Luke 13:3 KJV

[@quellolaeli]

Hey,pls can you spoke about the correlation of the birth of Rome whit the fratricide of Romolo and remo and the fratrice about Cain and Abel There are some point of contact or the only thing in common is the fratrice??? Sorry for my English if I made some error

[@bakhop]

Wow, finally my mind is at rest. Thank you for the resolution of this most pressing concern. What if one first century guy went one place for years instead of weeks and what if another one recorded it wrong? I really wish IP would go back to explaining physics, at least that does have some bearing on our actual lives. These endless streams of refuting mental midgets on tiktok and breaking down every single detail in the BIble that doesn't matter anyway is a tremendous waste of mental energy. It's really sad because IP actually has some mental energy worth saving, which cannot be said for most of the people he bothers to refute.

[@gordanwolfheart9365]

Sorry maybe someone can answer me this, what profession/degree have Michel jones?

[@evenly.2529]

he has a habit of quoting one scholar and imposing that view as a paradigmatic shift in that area.... look at his video on ''gospel anonymity''. There is literally NO shift in the consenus on gospel anonymity... bottom line: hes disingenious.

[@melchized3294]

​@@evenly.2529 The fact that you are disingenuous doesn't mean IP is. Just in this video, IP cites more than one scholar and I haven't watched any of his video that he cited just one scholar and did what you are accusing him of. Why not reference those specific videos he did that rather?

[@blusheep2]

Michael Jones is in the middle of getting a degree but I don't know if its in theology or philosophy. I imagine its in philosophy. I'm not sure how far along he is but hes been at it for over a year at least. Michael is someone that reads a lot of scholarly material and condenses it into a defense of Christianity and natural theology. Generally, his presentations are not formed as a "here is proof of my position" type of argument, but rather "there is good reason to believe X"

[@gordanwolfheart9365]

Oh thank you, i'm asking because I brough his video in a argoument and was debunked telling IP is not a professor or anything

[@melchized3294]

@@gordanwolfheart9365 That isn't debunking. For instance if I say sex is binary and I cite sources and research papers to back the claim up and you say I am wrong because I am not a professor or anything, and therefore you've debunked me, that doesn't make any sense. That's just a variant of Appeal to Authority fallacy.

[@Ezekiel365]

CHRIST'S RETURN (Isaiah 34:1-3) Come near "ye NATIONS" to hear For the INDIGNATION of the LORD is upon "ALL NATIONS" , and his "FURY" upon all THEIR ARMIES: he hath utterly DESTROYED THEM, he hath delivered them to the "SLAUGHTER" "their" SLAIN also shall be cast out, and "their" STINK shall come up out of "their" CARCASES and the mountains shall be melted with "their" BLOOD (Joel 3:2,9,12) I will also gather "ALL NATIONS" and will bring THEM down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with THEM there for MY PEOPLE and for MY HERITAGE "ISRAEL" Proclaim ye this among the "GENTILES" Prepare WAR wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near; let them come up let the "HEATHEN" be wakened, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat: for there will I sit "to JUDGE" (all) the HEATHEN round about (Obadiah 1:15-17) For the day of the LORD is near upon "ALL" the HEATHEN: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto THEE: thy reward shall return upon thine (own head) for as ye have drunk upon my holy mountain, so shall "ALL the HEATHEN" drink continually, yea, THEY shall drink, and THEY shall swallow down, and THEY shall be as though they had NOT BEEN "BUT" upon mount Zion shall be DELIVERANCE, and there shall be holiness; and the house of JACOB shall "possess their possessions" (Isaiah 66:15-16) For, behold, the LORD will come with "FIRE", and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render "HIS ANGER" with "FURY" and his REBUKE with FLAMES of FIRE for by FIRE and by "HIS SWORD" will the LORD plead with all flesh: and the "SLAIN" of the LORD shall be "MANY" (Zephaniah 3:8) Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until "THE DAY" that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to GATHER the "NATIONS" that I may assemble the KINGDOMS, to POUR UPON "THEM" mine INDIGNATION, even (all) my FIERCE ANGER: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my JEALOUSY (Isaiah 34:5-6) For my SWORD shall be bathed in heaven behold, it shall come down upon "ESAU" and (upon) the PEOPLE of my curse(Esau u n ur people) to "JUDGMENT" the SWORD of the LORD is filled with BLOOD for the LORD hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, and a GREAT SLAUGHTER in the land of "ESAU"

[@kira7035]

What purpose have you declared these words neighbor?

[@Ezekiel365]

@@kira7035 To prove that the modern day Christian message is false - nonIsraelites are finished

[@ChilrenofHELIO]

That whole book is a walking contradiction...that's why it's not holy at all. It's the Devils book of spells.

[@projectincomperablesloth3324]

I have a question, is paul a trustable source for the bible because my dad said that paul lied in the books because he was a politician and that the books were written after like 40 years after Jesus.

[@lucidcross8282]

No that's not true. So much of the new testament is compiled of Paul's letters. Most of the new testament are his writings. And Paul didn't write 40 years after Jesus. Paul wasn't even alive 40 years after Jesus. Jesus died sometime in 30 or 31 AD and Paul died sometime between 64-66 AD. Let's just say Jesus died in 30 AD and Paul died in 65 AD. This would mean Paul died 35 years after Jesus Also, scholars generally agree that Paul wrote Thessalonians between 48 and 51 AD. Which means Paul wrote Thessalonians 18-21 years after the death of Christ. Paul likely wrote Galatians sometime before Thessalonians. Paul's writings are early.

[@stls800]

There is no reason to think that Paul was a liar. A liar cannot produce a theological masterpiece, evil people can only destroy and corrupt. Also we need to remember that saint John was an eye witness (First John 1) and his teachings are very similar to Paul's theology. They both believe that Jesus is God and saviour who died for our sins. Paul just couldn't create his own religion even if he tried to because he was only one of the apostles and the early christian churches were not isolated from each other.

[@ash9280]

I never heard anything about Paul being a "politician". He was a community leader in certain contexts. Nothing gave him a authority to do as he pleased.

[@evenly.2529]

Paul is NOT trustable according to the majority of scholars.... (and common sense)

[@mysotiras21]

Paul was no politician. Your father obviously does not know the Bible.

[@islamismyidentity5322]

No need for false interpretation, poul himself said that he is a liar.. And the enemy of the message of Jesus pbuh.

[@lajarhead8308]

Citation please With full context, by the way.

[@mysotiras21]

Paul NEVER called himself a liar. Reporting you for LYING about Paul.

[@SeekTheCross]

No need, Muhammad told lies and especially during war times, cpsbuh.

[@islamismyidentity5322]

@@SeekTheCross do you belive Jesus is a lair ?

[@mysotiras21]

@@SeekTheCross , Muhammad's god is the best of deceivers (aka Satan), so we can hardly expect Momo to be truthful.