Do We Need A Moon Colony Before A Mars Colony?

[@jackguest145]

I'm glad he's covered up the laptop's logo. It's impossible to know what company it is.

[@penelope681]

i think it might be DELL XD

[@malcolmhardwick4258]

Its not Apple :]

[@africash0cks]

It's a shame he didn't have a sticker big enough to cover it.... oh wait.

[@libertyjosh804]

It looks like an apple lol

[@Dazzxp]

Looks like an Apple eclipse with the moon Phobos passing by ;-)

[@ItsCarll]

Can I still order from amazon if I move to the moon?

[@pizzamanpodesta145]

Maybe if you have amazon prime

[@evansiemasz9173]

Yeah, 2 day free shipping too

[@thomnasilikeswordfighting5506]

Evan Siemasz LOL

[@chicopico468]

I'd be fine staying in a habitat, as long as we still have the Internet.

[@R0BIN_]

ItsCarl if you can get pizza on the iss i guess?

[@DrZpook]

Terra Nova was a good series, shame it was canceled :(

[@TheCopelandr]

The guy's daughter was really hot

[@DrZpook]

Randy Copeland ;)

[@gouthamkrishna3565]

Hey

[@WingManFang1]

Demew R.I.P. Terra Nova

[@freedomloverusa3030]

Demew It was a communist serie based in Cuba. Spielberg was a close friend and fan of Castro, he agree with the communist repression in Cuba, all in the name of the common good, pure collectivism. Is an anticapitalist, anti-individual freedoms liberal hypocrite serie made to honor a communist butcher by a Hollywood multimillionaire. It was an offense to good and honorable women and men.

[@MuhsinunChowdhury]

Can we like, u know, cut like $20 bil from the military budget and give it to SpaceX for colonizing the Moon and Mars? Like, please? I think this is more important than a few extra tanks...

[@gemstonegynoid7475]

Muhsinun Chowdhury mmhmm. Last calculations, the united states military is funded greater than the next 10 or so nations combined

[@AKbornNinja999]

No. Lets take from other programs. Not our militaries gotta stay swole 💪🏻

[@keithedwards9953]

Viking, how would we go about doing that? Having a one world government sounds nice and all... But which government model should we go by? What economy should we have? You have to convince the entire world that you have a prosperous model to follow AND convince the world governments to surrender their authority to it. You may as well be talking to a wall on that last one. And any world government that would take away my constitutional rights is DOA in my book.

[@steve1279]

Muhsinun Chowdhury im sure elon musk would love to take those billions but he hasn't even gotten hyperloop to work, solar power is to expensive to really replace our existing energy production. You want to live on mars? You need a permanent reinforced space suit because of bonemass loss and its harsh to live the surface.

[@SimpWhiper]

Muhsinun Chowdhury more like 200 bil

[@tamasv9825]

We are thousands if not millions of years away from terraforming a planet and not even have tought the technologies that we need none of these would work.

[@3kus]

I think we have to colonise the moon first before mars, because it doesn't really need that much delta v for ships to leave the moon,making construction easier and cheaper because we don't need that much fuel and i think intercepting mars with a hohmann transfer would be easier as well. And i think we are still a few decades away from completing terraforming. But outposts and stuff like that would work. I still think we can live off artificial gravity created by rotation.

[@thegamingsnake7198]

+John Smith he mean that they shuld lunch from the moon BUT still colinize mars to

[@999okoli]

big but not strong

[@mountymike]

You saw the marshen.... as he said with an ath,osphere of 1% of that of earth, a 700mph storm would be like a 7 mph wind on earth.....

[@999okoli]

Michael O'Donohue but the strom in the marsian was unrealistic

[@mountymike]

yes aswell as that it would be a brease

[@Edit32]

Do it everywhere, at the same time. We're destined to become a multi planet, multi solar system species.

[@Gio-ym4uj]

YES! Let's conquer this solar system!

[@ImAfemaleNoob2]

+Giovanni Stracciari "Liberate" the solar system. We have to stop the Red Menace from spreading Communism to outer space! The only alternative to Democracy is DEATH.

[@Gio-ym4uj]

+Captain Kefler what.

[@ciaareinthecommentssection9575]

If scientocracy wins, yes. If democracy wins then we're doomed, if religion wins we're more dead than the dinosaurs.

[@abyssstrider2547]

it depends what religion I mean technology opposing religions like christians would stop our development like they are so radical against technology you won't believe

[@Chocwish]

Wowee. 10 yr old Trace was a smart kid. I haven't even thought of that idea and I'm a lil older than 10. GJ Kid Trace!

[@冬-01]

youre too young to be around 'ere

[@冬-01]

no horizon ;)

[@jasonpollock9824]

+no horizon *too, you don't seem that old

[@SuperHoeCakes]

+Jr B I'm 48 but mature for my age.

[@冬-01]

SuperHoeCakes 15 (._. )

[@off_Planet]

This video should have the title: "Pessimist scientists, as usual, underestimating the shit engineers can pull off with adequate funding" I highly suggest you all to pay the channel "Science and Futurism with Isaac Arthur" a visit.

[@dadofboy5487]

Thank you for the reccomendation.

[@theuncalledfor]

FUCK YEAH SFIA

[@Thorgon-Cross]

Isaac Arthur just takes it the other way and thinks we are going to build things useing as much steel as the weight as earth just to help us get into space. He is as factless as a 70-80 sci-fi author.

[@berndberg1414]

You can't compare real science and real engineering with Isaac Arthur's sci-fi!

[@shanelee8085]

That's ok, once we get there it's not about money it's about coming together with a common goal and accomplishing what needs to be done.

[@MMOStein]

I would imagine in 3017 Martians would look at this video an laugh.

[@SubhanKhan-lm9eo]

@MCVE great to the power of 100

[@nitinmangfi1379]

Do so

[@joannataylor3089]

More like 2100

[@aithanleeom5152]

I just hate earth I'd do anything to get off it.

[@sudore7318]

@@aithanleeom5152 why it’s fucking beautiful.

[@Danielhuren]

saying were gonna run out of food in 2050 is dumb and uninformative we already produce enough food for everyone and even the lowest estimates of what we could produce could cover the global population 10 times over the issue is getting that food to the right place not to mention global population is stabilizing India and china's population growth are actually declining and Africa though still growing last i checked is expected to plateau sometime in the late 2030's

[@A.D.540]

Europe has started Asia outside India well start by 2035, south America 2045-2048, India 2098, Africa 94% of nation 2098-2100 other 5-6 Africa Islamic Nation will grow up to 2125 and start to decline.

[@primusro]

@@A.D.540 Meh, same old scary stories that human population is too big, can't be maintained etc etc. With the right technologies which are only derived from what we currently have we could maintain a population hundreds of times bigger if it would've ever come to that, which it won't be needed. Of course that doesn't mean we shouldn't aim for the stars, literally and explore space.

[@A.D.540]

@@primusro I completely agree but the honest truth is some Islamic country say Space exploration is a sin, mostly middle east & African.

[@joimy95]

@@A.D.540 thats not true. The UAE is sending satelites and want to explore mars. Others also are planning the rest just does not have the resources...

[@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV]

Agreed.. Most farms waste food... Like tons of rotting banana's because they are too straight to sell!?! Customers want bendy banana's dammit! :) People rarely understand the relationship between resources and technology too.. In the 1970's a big computer predicted most of us would be dead by 2000, it was wrong, because it didn't understand how tech makes new resources. It just crunched a bunch of numbers we gave it... www.acsh.org/news/2017/09/27/no-world-wont-run-out-food-10-years-11884

[@MrNisse-ef9by]

Anyone who thinks terraforming Mars will work...needs to remember that Mars is the way it is, because of specific conditions inherent to Mars itself. Unless you can change those conditions...terraforming it will be a constant struggle against Mars' own natural state. Since we can't increase Mars' mass...anything we do to the atmosphere, will eventually be undone by the exact same process that caused it to lose it's atmosphere in the first place. You might as well try and develop the technology to cause a river to run uphill.

[@dice19951]

You have to constantly produce gas to maintain the atmosphere. I'm not sure how much, but I'm sure we could do it with a pretty simple automated process to create co2 and oxygen. Nitrogen would be another problem since mars doesn't have enough.

[@Sniffr0st]

Much better solution is to colonize Venus - build vast cloud cities 30 - 40 kms above the surface where theres earthlike gravitation and atmospheric pressure, 70 °C (hot, but not deal-breaker), and lot of shielding from radiation. Then have those cities slowly reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to make it colder and breathable. And maybe if we manage to come up with a way to thin the atmosphere, one day we could actually live at its surface.

[@omgPoopii]

+Sniffr0st 70 degrees Celsius is definitely a deal breaker

[@QuikProdigy]

+Sniffr0st I believe it's Fahrenheit not Celsius, we'd be dead at 70 Celcius. All our enzymes would die which makes all chemical processes in our body incredibly slow, thus killing us. NASA wouldn't invest time for colonizing a planet that no matter what would kill you. But Venus is a far better solution than Mars.

[@MrNisse-ef9by]

Paul Cappaert Shitty thing is...how do you create CO2 and Oxygen from nothing? You'd have to import them, or substances that contain them, in massive quantities...there's not enough water on Mars to use what's there. For a small habitat...it's doable. But for the whole planet...it's insane.

[@obsidaisy7776]

Mark my words: if you attempt to go to Mars without having a strong base on Earth's moon, the endeavour will fail and everyone involved will die. It's not a hypothesis, it's a guarantee. And even after you establish a base on the Moon, you must go to the Moons of Mars (Phobos and Deimos) before you go to Mars itself. We can't afford to be naive about this. If we take baby steps, we will make it. Giant leaps will doom us.

[@Coridimus]

"Astrology and Geology" wut?

[@kenhuffmanjr9919]

Coridimus just what I was thinking!

[@feynstein1004]

Lmao I was thinking the same.

[@CountArtha]

Maybe she got her degree at Hogwarts.

[@feynstein1004]

+CountArtha Lmao dude

[@gaskit8635]

Coridimus space shit and rock shit

[@RidingWithDave]

Haven't watched the vid yet, but I say yes. Cheaper, closer, easier communication and it's a good test as to how small colonies of humans fare being so isolated. Ok, time to watch lol.

[@andrewgraziani4331]

Yes, and speaking of tests, allows us to work out the bugs of launch infrastructure (railguns, sky hooks etc.)at low cost.

[@JourneyToTheCage]

Can you do a video on a space elevator? Such as the cost, how it will help, and the political dimensions as well.

[@20III]

Journey to the Cage space elevator is not possible for next 600 years

[@sc-sp4cm]

we have to go to the Moon first, it would be easier and cheaper to mine the Moon for resources to use as fuels and materials to build space ships then to launch them off the Earth, going into space from Earth is very expensive, the Moon has no atmosphere so it's easier. you can use materials on the Moon to build houses under the surface... to protect the people from the radiation and solar rays. we could be doing this already if we had people with the vision, desire and money to spend so we can go, Elon Musk ... no need to go to Mars till we can first build a colon on the Moon and make it work, why skip over the Moon when using the Moon could make all this easier. you could build space ships on the moon, get the fuels for the ships and train people on the moon for deep space missions, we have no choice it's something we have to do....or we'll end up like the dinasours

[@Summon256]

You give all those rich oil tycoon kingpins and vile politicians too many ideas i am afraid...it won’t be long before we will declare “moon wars” on one another...

[@Aquaneos1193]

I wish Elon Musk would give up on Mars and focus on the Moon

[@Summon256]

@@Aquaneos1193 Moon is boring! Just a dead rock with nothing but dust, dust and more dust in it...it doesn't have anything to sustain life, it isn't protected from sun rays and solar radiation, it isn't protected from borbardments from all the asteroids and meteors and it doesn't have any chemicals, that would help in the future! its just a dead celestial body! Why bother with it? LOL

[@alekduff1142]

Can we 'catch' asteroids that are passing near mars and smash them into mars moons, to create bigger moon? So tidal forces of that moon can melt mars core, generating magnetic field?

[@RedfishInc]

Alek it's not the most far fetched idea that I've ever heard. Pretty close but not quite...

[@mccama19]

That actually sounds like a pretty cool idea. I wonder if it would work?

[@Nathan_Bunga]

Maybe catching asteroids and smashing them on planets is how the dinosaurs got eliminated

[@denniswoo9334]

If. Mar does not has magnetic to protect the atmosphere from Sun, then terra forming may not work. Unless we ready to stay underground and oxygen is not release into the atmosphere to avoid sun blowing away the air.

[@Nathan_Bunga]

Build luxurious underground bunkers on the moon

[@thishadowithin]

I like these discussions...can you do the 3D printing series?

[@wmarzan8130]

yes please I would like that too

[@CodexQuinn]

+Waldemar Marzan I just laughed when he said "... Just strap an engine on an asteroid and point it at mars."

[@SamFisherK]

Imagine how human muscles would react for 1 year of living on the moon

[@IARRCSim]

It was tough on people who spent a continuous year in the International Space Station so the moon should be too. The little gravity should help just a little.

[@amorosogombe9650]

A lot better than one year on Mars!

[@saritalahoti7234]

@@amorosogombe9650 how come?? Moon's gravity 16% while Mars' 38% of that on Earth

[@amorosogombe9650]

@@saritalahoti7234 Because it's just a 3 day journey to the moon. And you can come back once a month. But the 12 months to Mars in zero G means your muscles are basically jelly by the time you get there so even though there's more gravity it comes too late to do you much good.

[@livefire666]

10 billion... The USA spends 600 billion a year, every year on its defense that is bigger then the next 6 nations combined. Not including the 6 trillion dollars spent by the USA in military operations and rebuilding programs in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2001-2016...

[@c4pt0bvi0us5]

Except that, if the US would lower it's defence budget it would fall. Their economy would be destroyed because it pretty much relies on their military industrial complex to pump money in their economy. And it does not matter how powerfull or great your empire is, an economic disaster can destroy any empire. Everyone from the British empire to the Romans will fall because their economies where shrinking or their resources where drying up. The Romans used slaves at first, but when that became illegal their empiee started to crumble slowly and it resulted in its ultimate fall. And the british had just lost lots and lots of their soldiers and equipment so they became overextended and they lost it all. Now if you wpuld ferry over 10 Billion it would get distributed to a lot less people in the process, costing a lot of jobs so it could start the fall of the US.

[@Nitzahrn]

Series on 3D printing in space? Hell yeah! I'm especially curious to see how the winner of the Mars 3D habitat challenge will print and maintain their ice dome.

[@fundayilmaz7775]

Each planet will have is independent governance or governances. Like Star Wars. But there will not be any interplanetary alliance and I do hope planets remain self sufficient. Let's just stop invading places to extract resources from them and learn to live in a mutually respectful way with the planets we inhabit... Living small lives, integrated fully with the nature around us isn't as horrific as most people think.

[@matthysfourie1962]

How can you deal with the low gravity though?

[@luoarnamsk]

Was thinking of the same thing

[@AstrobotJones]

artificial magnetosphere

[@azzyfreeman]

moon gyms with weight training... it will be interesting to see what happens...

[@shawnwales696]

+PenguinJockey And where is the power for that going to come from?

[@italego6]

People will wear suits that make them 6 times heavier on Earth, so that on the Moon they weigh normally.

[@SereneMadnesschannel]

Why can't we put Giant Domes over the Moons Craters... It would be an Incredible feat of Engineering. Pick a Crater Site Dome it & build your colony inside it. You could even build Agro-Domes for growing food. Build an Underground High speed Rail system to connect the crated domes... My 2 cents...

[@mccama19]

Sounds like a good plan to me! If we can build crazy big stadiums just to watch football live, we could build those same domes on the moon to live in.

[@Kombaiyashii]

what about introducing gas producing bacteria?

[@AstrobotJones]

you'd still have to have an ionosphere to hold in those gasses.

[@iam4peace511]

it would take a very long time to have an effect

[@mouykhshabon]

First you need to introduce a magnetic field

[@dougohboy5190]

mars already has bacteria.... mars has a breathable atmosphere....

[@dougohboy5190]

mars has a magnetic field..... alll you have to do is turn the faces on.

[@toastynolongerexists2060]

I think we should come up with a totally different way of being human. You would think after 6,000 years of recorded history, we would recognize the destructive patterns and say, "Hey! that is not working, stop doing it that way!" The problem with us colonizing another planet is that we take our problems with us. Our way of thinking, our belief systems, (all of them), have contributed to many of the problems we face on Earth, What would prevent us from repeating the same problems on another planet?

[@dub5107]

The moon seems a much better , safer, closer place to work the bugs out and get our feet wet ....if problems occur , we can get our people home in 3days..🌔

[@ericrowe5232]

Hmm if scientists can deliberate manipulating atmospheric compounds on a planet light years away, atleast in theory. One would think they could find a way to free up excess carbon from earths atmosphere.

[@302big5]

Eric Rowe well it would be to stop burning so much oil but oil companies wouldn’t like that

[@gazishariaralam7894]

why don't we take plants in pods to mars to create oxygen.......................because the mars has already co2 .,,,,which is the need of plants.....and they I mean the plants can make oxygen.............

[@thatkeepskillingyouintitan64]

Rahul Gazi No magnetosphere.

[@Al-cd7zg]

Rahul Gazi This is a very stupid and idiotic comment done with 0 research.

[@THX..1138]

Guess how much research has been done to see if humans can live long term in the reduced gravity of the moon or mars. Zero, that's right, zero!

[@chriscook9101]

Didn't they send that twin onto the ISS for a full year to research this? The answer is next to none, but not zero

[@phaedruslykos3249]

The body can't actually sustain itself in zero gravity, it needs the pressure given to us by Earth's gravity to regualte the endocrine and blood system. This is why Astronauts start pissing bloodas soon as they get into zero G.

[@joshuagalvez9678]

Isaac Gecas They just create gravity by having spinning living areas the way they do in spacecrafts

[@Defense0001]

OMG i love this show. IM ACTUALLY LEARNING

[@yonasbayou175]

Wow... I am very impressed with the new video layout that let's you choose specific topic. I love your channel and keep up the good work. KUDOS

[@jaredsullivan3229]

Why not just crash mercury into mars?

[@daxxonjabiru428]

That would be quite a project!

[@shawnwales696]

Because that would be crazy. even if you could find a way to move Venus out of it's own orbit and into a Collision with Mars, a monumental project BTW, you would have to deal with how that would affect every other body b in the solar system. Frankly if we had the wherewithal to do that, we could fix the problems we have here, and we already know this planet is habitable...the question is, for how long?

[@jaredsullivan3229]

+Shawn Wales Well first of all, its Mercury into Mars, Not Venus into Mars, Venus into Mars wouldn't even be funny to think about because its already about the size of earth and has way to much carbon dioxide and other green house gases, so you would have a huge planet that would take a hellava long time to settle. But Mercury into mars is feasible if you take it slow, because mercury is basically one giant melted metal ball floating in space, and that's exactly what mars needs, so if you slowly add the too, and nuke and asteroids that come off the collision and are going for earth, then you've got a planet maybe a tiny bit smaller or bigger than earth, with all the benefits of both

[@MJRSA9404]

Your theory is ridiculous. It's not even remotely possible! As Shawn said, if we could do that, then we would be able to fix our problems anyway, hahaha.

[@tacobeeznut]

Dream big

[@shadowpod13]

There's also the idea of making City In The Clouds on Venus. It's got an atmosphere and all the radiation protection. You just need to set up platforms that "float" in it's supper dense atmosphere.

[@marloyt7786]

No we don’t need a moon colony but we could make it an refuel base before going to other planets.

[@masterchief3648]

Actually we need to colonize the moon we are running out of space and the economy would explode if there was a moon colony we could get a ton of resources

[@shuashua958]

my favorite subject. thanks for posting.

[@schmalzilla1985]

Terraforming is a waste of time and resources. Build a rotating space habitat to what humans need. If you have the science and ability to terraform, then you have the science and ability to disassemble those planets, and use them to build millions more livable space, than what a single planet offers. Especially if we get fusion as a power source, we'll no longer be dependent on the sun. Even if we can't get fusion to work, fission is another great option. Not only that, but solar panels on a space habitat, always facing the sun, would be more effective than on a planet's rotating surface. Also, why would you want to put yourself into another gravity well. The majority of the cost of space travel, is tied up in fuel just to claw out of earth's gravity well, and air resistance. Why ground ourselves again? Also it wouldn't be that hard to augment a space habitat, for interstellar travel. Sure you could probably use a planet as a ship, but that has many hurdles to overcome, that a space habitat already has answers for.

[@banpowel9784]

Earth over populated by 2050??? So there is the Sahara desert? Antarctica? Many more desert areas that are large empty spaces

[@SaidinRage]

Over population doesn't necessarily have to do with physical space as much as having too many people and not enough food produced to support them.

[@ErikMello96]

Ben Powe inhabitable plus this is assuming we can feed all of these people

[@DS9TREK]

Ben Powe they were predicting starvation from lack of food until. only a few years before the Industrial Revolution kicked off and increased food availability. We're in the same place today except GM and lab grown meat will save us this time.

[@badbeardbill9956]

Yeah... no. Let's not do that. The Sahara desert is an important part of other areas. It actually has effects on the Amazon rainforest. The world is a large system. Changes are significant. And that's ignoring the change in the albedo...

[@ReevansElectro]

Earth is far better than Mars. Why not spend time making earth better instead of running away from the really tough problems? Education has helped reduce the population explosion in developed and even developing countries. Now, we just have to learn to get along together and realize that we are all in this world together.

[@ReevansElectro]

Good reason to get started now. We need to forget about fixing the planet we have and research how to get to a new on by that time in a million years from now if we survive the next hundred years.

[@optibee1]

Uran [AM] Wrong, not millions but billions, our sun is way more younger than you think

[@optibee1]

There are tons of people working on making Earth better right now, we are 7 billion, not a small class of students, while some work on this, others work on that.

[@optibee1]

There are tons of people working on making Earth better right now, we are 7 billion, not a small class of students, while some work on this, others work on that.

[@optibee1]

And this is not about leaving the planet, but to expand our presence in this universe. If a big big rock collided with this planet tomorrow ALL of our history would be wiped away in hours.

[@philippf.1384]

What about crashing Phobos into Mars to increase the weight of the planet? The damned moon is already going to crash into Mars anyways. Would the combined weight be enough to retain an atmosphere?

[@DS9TREK]

Philipp F. I never understand why people say Mars doesn't have enough gravity to hold an atmosphere. Venus has 2% less gravity than Earth but holds onto an atmosphere 90x greater than Earth's. Mars can easily hold onto an atmosphere. The issue is the solar wind. you either have to replace lost atmosphere more quickly than the solar wind removes it, or find a way to protect it from the solar wind

[@epicbastard1]

Exactly my thoughts. Hell, even Saturns moon Titan has atmosphere and its surface gravity is smaller than that of our moon.

[@Tuzszo]

Phobos is less than 1% the mass of Mars, in fact I think Olympus Mons is actually significantly larger than the entire moon. Not enough to change the escape velocity meaningfully.

[@anonb4632]

Philipp F. Better to crash comets into it.

[@jellyfishbones0]

a heavily depleted earth will still be a far better candidate for rehabilitaion than any other planet by terraforming.

[@KougaJ7]

Me: "DNews Plus, what is your motivation for leaving earth?" Dnews Plus: "We're running out of food by 2050, FACT! PLUS ASTEROIDS! They could show up at any time." *Uncomfortable silence*

[@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV]

I don't think the doomsayers understand resources and their relationship to technology.. :) www.acsh.org/news/2017/09/27/no-world-wont-run-out-food-10-years-11884

[@MrCognito]

If we screw up the moon it might have impacts on the Earth but if we screw up Mars, Earth is not affected.

[@jasonlast7091]

How are we gonna screw up the moon THAT bad.

[@Mic_Glow]

He probably means a situation where the colony starts to fight for independence (or something).

[@nicevideomancanada]

it might be easier to rid Earth of 7 Billion people.

[@gaius_enceladus]

A moonbase would be a very good idea. The moon is easy to get to, communications delay is minimal and water has now been found there. It's a perfect place to get a small outpost up and running before building one on Mars.

[@magmadude35]

is there anywhere with updates on the space elevator that they had planned in Japan?

[@havek23]

Wouldn't any atmosphere we build up on Mars just be eroded away by solar winds since there's no spinning magnetic core to generate a shield like we have here on earth?

[@A.D.540]

If we put lot of geothermal & nuclear power plant over time the planet will start to get warmer, which would lead to for the core to heat up? Remeber the hotter the planet get more co2 well be released from the planet which will speed up the process more creating magnetic filed. The planet from their own should be abel to take more heat from the sun.

[@amorosogombe9650]

No one is colonizing the moon in 2022 but the moon just seems so much wiser. We can send supplies, rescues, space stations along the way. Space station in lunar orbit, they're close enough to talk to family back home. The moon just makes a tonne of sense. Even the names for future lunar citizens are cool. Lunartics or Mooners. I say moon first!

[@anonb4632]

7:26 Professor of Astrology. She also said that your lovelife will be hot when Venus is in Aries.

[@squeakypistolas]

I am in love with this intelligent channel ! Thank you!

[@shortforchange]

i wonder what brand that laptop is?

[@robinalonso3466]

I had a weird idea. If we developed a shuttle to travel to the moon and, for example, you live in Chile, would it be better to travel at night, when the moon is more visible? Help

[@ronaldwong6092]

No. go straight to the Goldilock Planet.

[@MidnightSt]

Most of the stuff you said here was to me like "yeah, yeah, 2 years old info, in this one you're 2 years behind the current potential solutions, yeah, this one's still actual, and then WATER FROM SOLAR WINDS? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? THAT'S FUCKIN COOL AND I'VE NEVER HEARD OF IT OR THOUGHT OF IT BEFORE NOW!!!" Just for that single idea, this video was worth it. Thank you. P.S. I love your style of explaining. Even if you provided no new info, you're one of the content creators I love to watch even just to refresh the already-gained knowledge and fill silence with something pleasant and interesting to listen to.

[@lylewood2029]

Not just going to the moon but living on the moon for several years would teach us a myriad of things that today we don't even know we don't know. Then maybe we can do Mars right.

[@markmarsh27]

GREAT work! .... New Subscriber! .... keep it comin'!!

[@DerKiesch]

What I didn't see too much in the discussion yet is, that moon lack of an athmosphere might be a unique feature. Where on earth you have to lift a rocket up first before accerlerating "sideways" on moon you could do this with a ground based facility. Basically there might be ways to drastically reduce fuel requirements by using some ground based "rail gun like" system to get payloads up to a certain velocity - basically only needing a small amount of fuel afterwards for circularisation. In a way this means that, where on earth it's difficult to get up to orbit, and a little easier to get back down (aerobreaking), on the moon it might be really easy to get up into orbit and at least easier to get down because of the low gravity. A munar colony might a actually be a much larger step in colonizing the solar system than we realize currently.

[@MrGayhamster]

This guy is really good in explaining those complex think on a simple way

[@suddenrushsarge]

Haven't even watched the video yet, and just based on the title I have to say: YES!! We need to be practical before we fire ourselves off to the next planet over. Let's set up a staging area on the Moon, so that we can master leaving earth and making successful dockings/landings. We can also set up a refueling station with a place to prepare for longer distance flights, by stockpiling necessities like food and equipment. The moon has lots of WATER, which can provide us with both oxygen and fuel (hydrogen gas) and obviously water itself. We've got pretty great rover's on Mars already. Patience!! We'll get there!!

[@reyh9894]

Can we simulate This in a pc?

[@Jack_Kirrane]

Picture a colony starts on the Moon and then civilization collapses on earth and they survive for thousands of years underneath the surface of the Moon and are rediscovered when a new civilization arises confirming the legends are true.

[@sprinter768]

Why is the potential colonization of Mars being considered as a solution to the Earth's overpopulation? even if Mars were colonized, we are nowhere near being capable of building gigantic ships capable of relocating a large number of us to Mars to make a dent in the overpopulation problem.

[@pizzamanpodesta145]

I agree, Mars is retarded. But there is a new ship in the works that could make the trip in just two days. futurism.com/space-train-concept-could-get-humans-to-mars-in-two-days-if-only-it-would-work/

[@dice19951]

+Pervbot 5000 this idea isn't at all feesible

[@gaius_enceladus]

I think a moon colony first makes *huge* sense! Water has now been found there (at least at the lunar south pole) so that makes a colony possible. There is almost no comms delay between earth and the moon so that's a good thing. If something goes badly wrong, travel time between moon and earth (either way) is only 2-3 days or so. If people are determined to set up a Mars colony soon then that's fine and I wish them good luck, but a moon colony makes a lot of sense!

[@elfinplatypus1341]

Answer for the title question: Basic answer - Probably yes. Long answer - It's not needed, but the lower gravity of the Moon means that launch stages need less fuel, making them lighter. Which is good in literally every way.

[@neriluisarellanes3255]

Here's an idea. Colonize the moon and then use it as a sling shot to travel easier to other places. No atmosphere to worry about in the moon.

[@victorborg7285]

Great head start for venturing out into the cosmos. Mine helium 3 for fuel and it's a lot easier to take off from. Colonize underground away from the radiation

[@daddyvinn]

what if we cant really terraform mars coz it was not suitable for life? coz if its suitable for life the planet must have lifeforms even it is a bit farther from the sun.

[@nihaar5359]

He looks like an alien

[@jeremym3772]

People are forgetting you only need to keep the atmosphere for 1000 to 10,000 year span before restarting the process all over again

[@maixck]

6:00 Going to mars because there are too much people on Earth is RIDICULOUS. a floating city on earth would be touldsands of times easier per person to make, or an undergound city. The only reasons to go there are 1- Science 2- because we can 3- to be multi planetary. It will NEVER solve population problems. Even if we wake up tomorrow to a fully terraformed MARS, we could not take enough people there to stave off overpopulation. That being said earth will totally be capable of sustaning humanity by 2050.

[@journeytodiscovery2430]

I am personally of the opinion that before terraforming Mars and completely changing the planet, we should conduct more research into the geological history of the planet.

[@cryptoguy3196]

We needed a moon base many many yesterdays ago. Do we even have a simple plan afoot ?

[@TurboKing12]

New atmosphere on Mars could be protected with a satellite in locked orbit between the Mars and the Sun. It's called a magnetic dipole shield. It could protect Mars from solar wind stripping and energy radiation at the surface

[@lentencraft]

wait... when we send 10 people to the moon or even 1000 to the mars then their are still 7 billion on earth... when im wrong pls correct me.

[@stevemattison2936]

This video: "We would need to cut the UV and raise the pressure of the atmosphere..." Ur-Quan Kzer-Za: "I got you covered, interloper bro."

[@idea1407]

Though this video was made a year ago, it's amazing to realize that everyone is heading to the moon. NASA, SpaceX, Bigelow, ESA, Roscosmos, and China are all planning for the moon. Goverment and commercial ventures on the moon and around the moon await.

[@martindingle3303]

To colonise mars I recommend 2x 600kT magnets north and south Pole and the magnets would act like a shield with added Electric pulsed through to the magnets and would protect the Mars atmosphere without the sun stripping the Mars atmosphere . add solar panels to the idea then you would get a shield.

[@grond21]

The 3D printing idea is definitely worth pursuing.

[@l_ilypad]

Almost 500k subs! Good Job!

[@izzrainy7410]

Make a huge swarm of magnetic satellites around Mars. Problem solved. That should hold against the solar wind.

[@mccama19]

research is being done on that idea right now!

[@cbmckinn6306]

How big a rocket, and how long do you think it would take to spin Mars up like a top to 24hr per day revolutions? Then it would be kinda like home. Just kinda curious in hypothetical.

[@susandavis5660]

if the martian core has cooled and is composed of nickel ,iron would it be possible to magnetize it? like we did in elem science class only on a much larger scale. also I don't think the weaker gravity is as much a factor IE Titan has an even weaker Gravitational field but has a very thick atmosphere

[@furiouslybeardedgamer5227]

Here's how you terraform mars without all the complex problems. build an array of magnets at the north and south pole big enough to generate a planetary field, then build giant solar battery arrays to power them. now you got your magnetic field. then proceed with the next phase and build a bunch of atmosphere generators across the planet that release ozone, oxygen, and carbon dioxide so it builds up the atmosphere and thickens. once thats completed you can tear down those generators for parts as after that phase they become useless. then go build facilities designed to help speed up the process for re-fertilizing the soil and make the dirt healthy again for growing. after that its a matter of just letting humans do what they do best and build new homes for people to live there and bring a bunch of people over. obviously this will take some time to do but in the end it has a high percentage of success and could be done in a relatively reasonable time. I love talking about space stuff and it is exciting to engage with others and make space plans together because if we are going to leave this rock in the future, we are going to do it together so lets brainstorm. tell me what you think and if there are areas where we can improve and make it happen faster no matter how small, dont hesitate to say it.

[@forestgreen41]

This guy is cool! He makes science fun and entertaining! I hope he teaches kids somewhere.

[@abhyudayaagrawal9912]

What Trace just said about the people evolving by going in different planets could be true because they would be affected by many things, on the other hand they could not be affected by it because the human resist a change(until and unless it is useful for them).

[@krylissnorwind7528]

The difference between people going to the new world and to the moon. There was food in the new world, air, water, building materials, gravity, lack of cosmic radiation.

[@FWAMUG]

Just thinking that everyone forgets the 2 most important things about terraforming Mars. 1) you need to increase it's gravity to much closer to 1g. 2) You need to create a planetary magnetic shield similar to what earth has. If you cannot do those two things then anything you do to Mars is going to fail

[@DJRAJEE]

Cheers for the videos

[@davidtekaat246]

I have looked at a lot of videos about colonizing the moon. And I haven't found any with my same ideas. I think we should set up a moon colony on earth. We should have inflatable domes, which we cover with 3D printers with simulated moon mortar. The domes should be connected to each other by inflatable tunnels covered with simulated moon mortar. There should be living quarters, hydroponic green houses, gardens with garden soil for recreational gardening, a 5 acre pasture with one inch of garden soil and one inch of grass turf, a park with artificial turf and with small sections of real grass turf, and maybe even a very small zoo. All the domes will have plastic floors so no water is lost. Condensation forming on the ceilings will be drained into the water supply. All the domes will be blown up with compressed air from earth and will have a refresh system, which will refresh the air and maintain the air pressure. Humidity, Temperature will be maintained by humidifiers, heaters, fans and coolers. Light will be provided by multi-color LEDs, mostly white. Power will be supplied at first by solar power, and later by nuclear or fusion power. There will be a bull, a cow, two sheep, and two goats, two chickens, two turkeys, two fish, and two rabbits. There will also be pets, two dogs, two cats, two bunnies, etc. (and maybe a small zoo) All of this will be set up by astronauts and robots before the colonist arrive. The first colonist will be 5 fathers and 5 mothers, and 90 babies. The parents will be good parents, gardeners, farmers, zoo keepers, teachers, etc.. During the first two years an exact duplicate facility will be built on the moon. When the babies are two years old, they will move to the moon and live on the moon. Or if it is proven that they will be too young to travel to the moon than the facility on earth will be added to, to accommodate 10 more parents and 90 more babies. The two year olds would move into the new addition. Every two years the facility will be either added to, or 100 people will move to the moon. This plan will allow the kids to grow up in the isolation of the colony, and will make it easier for them to live in the isolation of the colony on the moon. And will allow them to grow up on the moon and be better able to adjust to the lower gravity on the moon, although some artificial gravity maybe eventually provided. This artificial gravity will especially be good for the parents. The kids will have everything in the facility to keep them occupied and entertained. Also they could have some books, movies, games, etc., especially adapted for them, being careful not give them anything that would make them feel isolated. After 20 years there could be 2000 people living on the moon, most of whom grew up on the moon. This program could be speeded up so in 20 years there could be 4000, 6000, or 8000 people living on the moon. This program could be simultaneously done to colonize Mars so we could have 2000 people on the Moon and Mars at the same time. For the moon we could send supplies every month, but for Mars we could only send supplies every 26 months. So I suggest we send 10, 20, or 30 rockets to Mars every 26 months all at the same time. We could have several refueling stations along the way to mars and orbiting mars so rockets could refuel along the way to mars and right before landing on mars so the empty rocket would have enough fuel to take off again, refuel in space and return to Earth. Eventually the moon and Mars could export minerals or small expensive items that were assembled on the moon or Mars, like jewelry, iphones, iwatches, etc. Or grown on the moon like caviar, marijuana, etc.

[@murillonoob]

nice job, keep on it!

[@thecrystalcrystals9242]

Put it this way: You need to place a dock on the seashore before you can sail across the greater ocean.

[@gunner678]

very interesting and well presented

[@ZeroFksGvn]

Colonizing the moon has been an idea far longer than the year 2000, mobile suit Gundam was made like 40 years ago, and Tomino who created the series used a lot of ideas borrowed from American physicist Gerrard O'neill. Luna City and Von Braun are possible. And also making the O'neill cylinder style colonies would be easier to make if we had colony's already outside Earths atmosphere. And if you want to dismiss any of this, feel free but remember that we now have lots of things originally introduced in Star Trek. Food for thought.

[@whiskeybravo8051]

I think if you're curious about the sociopolitical climate of space colonization, you should look at what the writers of Japan's famous "Mobile Suit Gundam" have to say on the subject. It's a very interesting story they tell.

[@Andrew-fn9oc]

I think we should go to the moon, build these inflatable habitats, a lot of them, enough to house thousands, then get all of the rocket scientists and a lot of builders and construction workers over there... and of course guards in case some idiot wants to ' conquer the moon' lol. And then build some space ships... the moon has a tiny, tiny ,tiiiny atmosphere, and has much less gravity than earth, so getting rockets off the moon surface would be much easier. Doing this would give us two options for rockets: 1: put less fuel in them making it cheaper 2: make them just as powerful, but bigger, more storage and more space for people to be meaning more astronauts They could also dig massive mine-shaft-esc systems on the moon, pressurize them, then boom, more space for people to live. :D

[@stanwoody4988]

None of this is simpler, cheaper, more possible, or benefits more than taking care of the planet we have. If it is a choice between putting a solar collector on my roof or living my life inside a Darth Vader costume, I say "fire up the Prius we're ago'in to the Sunshine Store.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

Bases on Moon are very necessary, colonizing Mars or not. It would come in handy for Refueling, Repairing, Spare equipment, Mission directions, Observing Space & Asteroids and Instant rescue mission can also be done quite easily. The operating crew of any mission doesn't need to come back to Earth for these kinds of things quite often while damaging the heat shields in Earth's atmosphere and wasting tons of fuel to go back to space once again. A Moon base is ideal. Mars mission will be much more easier if Moon bases are built first.