Do you REALLY think we didn’t land on the moon?!

[@JacobShepherdEngineer]

Keep in mind, you can't see stars during the day, but they're still there.

[@Uvoted4this]

How do you know if you can't see them

[@Jordy-927]

Obviously fake. Definitely not how stars work. 😂😂 Edit: in case the emojis didn't give it away, this is a facetious comment. I can't believe smart people read this and think otherwise.

[@firstnamelastname396]

Wrong look at his eyes, STARE at them notice how he talks find the middle

[@lawrencedoliveiro9104]

The moon-landing deniers seem willing to concede that we have got as far as low-Earth orbit. But those photos from those flights, showing the brightness of the Earth and the darkness of space in the same picture, don’t show any stars either, for the same reason.

[@mylesm5701]

@@firstnamelastname396maybe try English next time

[@chewygaming1]

"If i don't understand it, then it's fake."

[@user-up1id5rv2m]

Of course!

[@RecordedMercury]

You just have low esoteric knowledge

[@joycedavis9996]

do you understand the air you breathe?

[@whereismycup]

@@joycedavis9996air is fake, we breathe water, but I don’t really understand it. This is what THEY are trying to hide!

[@eliminator1472]

“I’m also smarter than everyone else”

[@SlappleBattles]

“You can’t see stars during the day.” The Sun: Am I a joke to you?

[@martinbgiles7065]

We are all a joke for them ..

[@SlappleBattles]

@@martinbgiles7065 real

[@lastresort2600]

"that's a sun idiot"

[@darnellboyd4391]

Yes you are

[@wordwizard3912]

The sun is a star but stars are not suns

[@brianedwards7142]

Fun fact- all the "stars" you see out of the windows on Star Trek are sequins sewn onto a black curtain just outside the focal length of the camera so they're blurry.

[@I_Stole_A_BTR-80]

Not outside of focal length, but out of focus. Focal length refers to the distance between the center of the lens and the film or sensor.

[@edlomonaco]

Fun fact when a guy has a smooth ken doll package in an underwear ad, it's a slice of wonder bread.

[@mrandersson2009]

They should hire paparazzi as astronauts. They are really good at taking pictures of stars.

[@hitzoneproductions7858]

😂

[@justinezafra]

Excellent Dad joke. 👌

[@dandi1887]

Underrated joke

[@never_give_up90]

Lol that's not bad.

[@sammiedee7838]

That's a good one 👍🏽

[@LokiDWolf]

As a photographer, this is VERY accurate.

[@yamato126]

The stars are there they are just poorly rendered in 1950s 2d

[@iamapokerface8992]

ok

[@iamapokerface8992]

nobody cares that you are a "photographer" not a job anyway

[@unknownph537]

​@@iamapokerface8992No one ask you kiddo better touch some grass

[@sharkgrenadevr]

​@@iamapokerface8992 Do you think the moon landing was faked or something

[@kendob9642]

Space may be the final frontier but its filmed in a hollywood basement

[@nw4042]

Sun came up in the east at least it settled in a finer location.

[@freedommovementmusic]

Anthony knows what’s up 👍🏽

[@jeffbeck8993]

Probably why stars aren't visible in the middle of a brightly lit city.

[@dasar2234]

Temperature of the moon is like -240 c of course they didn’t go

[@LunaPal1]

​@@dasar2234 temperature in Canada is below 0°C during winter, of course nobody lives in Canada, this country is 100% fake. If people lived there, water in their organisms would freeze and turn all of them into ice sculptures

[@figmillenium]

Every single night… it’s true

[@Ezekiel365Days]

Neil said in terms of the potograph and camera that we had back then but if we used todays cameras and photography we will see it. Also remener the earth has many atmosphere so we don’t see the universe during the day because the sun lights reflections based off the atmosphere

[@thepinktreeclub]

​@@dasar2234braindead take.

[@ironiccookies2320]

Tell those people to take a picture of some twinkling stars while in the city. Their cameras wouldn't even capture it.

[@elidyson256]

So you admit it should've

[@jbhk7977]

They feed you the easiest narrative and everyone becomes a "specialist".

[@tubecated_development]

@@elidyson256?

[@tubecated_development]

@@jbhk7977This is basic photography, not a ‘narrative’?

[@jbhk7977]

@@tubecated_development The problem is not "photography basics". The problem is that people learned not to question the "experts". There are so many strange things surrounding the moonlanding. The "live phone call" for instance, meanwhile there are huge area's in the world (2024) where people still don't have cell service. Also the narrative that we lost the technology to go back to the moon or how they got the moon rover on the moon considering the fact that Apollo 15 was as big as apollo 11. But let's not get into that . . . The problem is that people fail to question things, only because a specialist tells you a reasonable story. Where I live we say "who checks the checker". In this case . . . no one. And if you dare to question him or question the narrative, you are a conspiracy theorist. This should scare you shitless. We entered an era where critisizm and hard questions are dismissed and rediculed. We live in an era where a virologist with 40 years of experience is "fact checked" by a 21 old woke idiot with blue hair and a nose ring banning his 30 min video with dire warning within 190 seconds. Thousands upon thousands of specialists were silenced the past 4 years by the woke liberal "experts" and look what we are facing because of that . . . excess m*rtality. Question everything my friend everything because that's the only way we evolve and stay sharp.

[@kizzik]

They are the same ones who don't go on cruise ships for fear of falling off the edge. 😂

[@skyshatter3633]

no, no they claim the edge is guarded by military who will prevent them from reaching it. Aka why they cant go there to prove their bs

[@danno5805]

Those railings should be higher 😮

[@Xinnie_The_Flu]

Are they Muslims?😂

[@Venomm737]

​@@CareBear-hi3cxThat's a coincidence

[@user-lq1tb1eq7z]

You KNOW... dontcha?!

[@70sloburna]

My argument would be the lack of space travel afterwards...

[@erac5855]

Pretty common argument. Congress had cut NASA’s Apollo program funding before the final missions even flew. Which is why we never had Apollo 18 through 20.

[@fredbyoutubing]

There still is space travel, just no manned missions to the Moon. Now, if Lithium or other precious ressources were discovered, maybe someone would spend money to go back.

[@travisbrimer772]

I have photos of the moon. And there's no stars in the background. If I held the shutter open. Stars would appear, but the moon would be a white blob

[@GeraldPartitio]

Yeah but like professional cameras you have to have certain lenses or really expensive cameras to capture night time stuff at all. Because like neil said its all about the camera capturing the light which star light and even moon light is 1/1000 of stuff in the sun. I have an semi expensive camera not like 5000 or 10000 but yet I still haven't been able to get clear pictures of the moon or any stars. Think it requires certain additions attached to it.

[@travisbrimer772]

@GeraldPartitio the main thing you need on any camera, regardless of lens, for night photos is manually controlling the iso and shutter. Most even entry level dslrs are more than capable. What kind of camera do you have?

[@elram2649]

​@GeraldPartitio Try these easy settings on your camera to capture the moon's details without being blown out into a glowing white blob: 1. Setting on Manual. Shutter Speed: 1/100 second Aperture: F/8 ISO: 100 These settings are very easy to remember. You might even see some faint stars (even colored ones) around the moon depending on the season and the Earth's rotation at the time you capture the images.

[@angelsjoker8190]

The Soviet Union didn't deny the Americans were on the moon. This is enough of an indicator for me to think they were, in fact, on the moon.

[@lloydearlofpudding9536]

Omg, i've been saying that for so long. You just know that soviets scientists had to go over the footage hundreds of Times in Hopes of finding a fake. The soviets would've loved to expose NASA as frauds, but they did not...

[@patrickjane2024]

americans probably pay them off. the real question is why russia never sent there people to the moon then if it was that easy?

[@koryburdet1317]

Yeah they were walking and driving on the moon. And made a direct call to the president while up there 😂😂😂😂

[@mleise8292]

That was my mother's #1 argument when it came to moon landing denial - and her brother was into that conspiracy for a while.

[@mleise8292]

@@koryburdet1317 Nixon called _them_, routed through mission control. (A direct call would have 3 seconds delay, but Nixon has to wait 7 seconds until he hears back from the astronaut.)

[@ct_devoid]

How terrifying being in space and on the moon must have been, but also exhilarating.

[@user-fb5jr9ih1w]

Didn’t happen

[@mr.anderson6040]

Also, your brain development after you were born​😂😂😂@user-fb5jr9ih1w

[@tubecated_development]

@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyou forgot evidence to prove your claim.

[@Isaac5123]

No way it happened. The american flag stays up by the wind where there is no atmosphere there lol😅​@@user-fb5jr9ih1w

[@OhRealG]

@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyes it did

[@Aroncare]

STANLEY KUBRICK IS A GREAT FILM MAKER

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

So?

[@davisfan]

Photographer here. Stars are dim and require long exposures and high camera sensibility (high ISO). Sunlight, on earth, is so bright, that not a single star can be captured on the sensor using the same settings as a day scene. So, if the astronauts are lit by the sun, and the picture has to display them, then no stars will be seen on film or on a digital sensor.

[@shauncejohn9200]

Ty❤

[@nikolozka1]

Does that make the earth to shrink too?

[@lazymass]

​@@nikolozka1what are you talking about? People like you really do have some problem to comprehend space distances, don't ya?

[@user-ch7ks9ph5l]

​@@lazymassrelax man

[@BasilMalik]

tog here, confirmed.

[@ChessAndRap]

The camera man was the first person on the moon, THEN Neil and Buzz.

[@claudiopadilha6551]

hahahaha

[@Alexander-wl8qd]

😢😂

[@davidhillman7004]

Yes this picture that you refer too is what I was talking about

[@davidcross5455]

And the last I think he's still up there

[@dhamm7415]

The rover you mean 😂

[@TevrenEndrigan]

Not to mention the moon rocks we brought back, the laser reflector we placed up there, and the scientific assertions that were made about what we found in going to the moon that have been helpful to return trips for us and other country's lunar missions.

[@scdb123]

Just eating the government propaganda like it was real

[@vincnet1982]

They have supposedly misplaced all those materials and all the original films.the items from the most important moment in history and they misplaced them. Also how about the "moon rock" Armstrong brought back specially for the Dutch prime minister?

[@scdb123]

@@vincnet1982 that's NASA for you. unbelievable we lost all of the Data. LMFAO 😂

[@NeoWish]

All of it can be done using probes that can go back to earth, duh Try better reasoning.

[@kingsman428]

​@@NeoWishJodrell Bank Observatory in the UK tracked the Apollo mission and the Russian satellite that smashed into the moon with telemetry data. Try better reasoning or better still, explain how the Americans spoofed the electronic signals to fool the radio telescopes.

[@djlp2212]

I always say this, go to a football field at night while the lights are on during a clear sky and you can not see one star in the sky.

[@bretk7916]

You are 100% correct.. The only difference between the football field and on the moon numerous factors one being the sun is not as bright as what you would think unless you were looking in its direction. In space there is no medium for light to refract or reflect off of. Which mean the sun rays or light waves continue on like a infrared laser beam. And the moon absorbs 85% of the light that is shined upon it. The light that does reflect off of the surface of the Moon illuminates nothing else due to the lack of atmosphere and continues on in whatever direction it is reflected. On earth the medium is dust particles gases like oxygen CO2 nitrogen and so on that light refracts through. Unlike the dark gray surface of the Moon that absorbs light Earth is full of water snow plants etc that reflect more sunlight The light that is reflected is refracted and reflected by the atmosphere what is reflected comes back to Earth once again. This is why the earth is illuminated. On top of everything else out on the moon there would be no atmosphere to block infrared light as the Earth's atmosphere does and just so happens that cameras back then or even today actually even digital pick up infrared light that we cannot see. To get an idea of what it would be like with the sun shining on the moon. If you paint a room with nothing in it the walls black a flat black and shine a flashlight into that room You will not see it because there's nothing for it to reflect off of because it absorbs all the light. Unless you are in the room looking back towards the flashlight is the only way you'd see it.

[@sakshamsanwaria7486]

​@@bretk7916We didn't go to the moon then, huh?

[@emilioparrilla465]

​@@sakshamsanwaria7486obviously. All apollo missions have been thoroughly debunked from top to bottom. And you would never even dream of debating that or you will be crushed unequivocally. Just assume you're correct and go on with your day 👍

[@deryk2002au]

Neil De Grassy thinks men can be women so... can't take him seriously on anything

[@topherkrock]

@@emilioparrilla465, truth is the opposite of what you said.

[@davephillips2029]

These are the same people that say the Earth is flat and not a sphere

[@blotfd]

it's level. it's a horizon not a curvizon, c'mon now

[@eggabacon]

It's obviously an obtuse angle that changes degrees throughout the day

[@adamstevens3263]

It usually goes hand in hand

[@SinoKadafi1091977]

It’s flat and oval shaped

[@harleyb7880]

The earth is flat tho

[@yfi62dortoh]

It’s hard enough to take a picture of the stars at night on earth without night mode settings, let alone with a camera from 1969

[@castleanthrax1833]

And almost impossible when you aren't intentionally trying to photograph stars.

[@jmoney6043]

Funny how much better our technology is now then in 1969 but we still can't go back. 😂😂

[@castleanthrax1833]

@@jmoney6043 Than*

[@bretk7916]

This is not accurate at all it's actually pretty easy I just did it the other day just to test the theory I live out in the country and I have a pole light and I was able to photograph the stars along with the roof of my shop at the same time with my Android phone no special settings. Although that is a digital photograph. But in turn film like what they would have used back then reacts to light. Even light from far off distance like stars which would actually be brighter on the surface of the Moon because there would be more frequencies of light like infrared which cameras pick up this is what camera flashes use to illuminate the object your photographing That's why some flashes aren't very bright or even way back when when they used a flame for their flash because if we could see infrared light that flame would be extremely bright.. I guess you wouldn't call it a flame but a very mild explosion I guess you could say

[@castleanthrax1833]

@@bretk7916 Humans can't see infra-red light at all, so if a flash is at all visible, there must be some form of light in the visible spectrum. We can only feel infra-red light, otherwise known as heat.

[@betaneptune]

You can check this at home. Find a place where you can see the stars. Now, in the foreground, place a person in a bright white outfit, as white as the astronauts' spacesuits. Shine light on it to full daylight level. Take a picture with your smartphone. How many stars do you think you'll see in the photo?

[@tubecated_development]

“Shine a light on it to full daylight level” Good luck finding that light …

[@larryroyovitz7829]

@@tubecated_development Proves his point, you could do this with WAY less light.

[@pauldusa]

Not 1 man or woman from any country has ever set foot on the moon

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

Another who makes a claim but does not present any evidence to back it up.

[@tubecated_development]

It’s fun to say stuff!

[@billsgym5579]

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Find and watch the Apollo 11 press conference from 1969. Do they look excited in any way like they achieved something special or do they look like the coach explaining why they lost the Superbowl?

[@laurastewart9877]

Oh really. So you alone are the only expert? Where's your proof?

[@tubecated_development]

@@billsgym5579 Men were different back then, not behaving in general like sugared-up metrosexual cheerleaders. Watch the whole conference, they show some humour. They weren’t TV personalities.

[@leroysiedenburg2139]

Can we see stars in the daylight on PLANET EARTH!!!! VERY RARELY! So why would you expect to see stars on the moon in bright sunlight???

[@NYKevin100]

To be fair, Rayleigh scattering makes it a lot harder on Earth than it would be on the Moon (no atmosphere). But apparently that just doesn't make enough of a difference.

[@christopherscott8853]

Open your eyes. I'm disgusted with my own father for his role in perpetuating this illusion. Use your God given brain. No one or vessel has ever been to Mars let alone the moon

[@altortugas5979]

That’s an idiotic thing to say.

[@christopherscott8853]

@@altortugas5979 says who?

[@nightmarexgaming120]

⁠@@christopherscott8853I don’t believe in god. Yes we did land on the moon. And why would land in mars first?

[@benno291980]

There's pretty much one thing that shuts down any conspiracy for me; the Soviets. They had supreme means and motive to call us out but never said a word. Congratulated us actually.

[@Taj_Rahine]

Russian a.i. identified the moon landing photos as fake about a month or so ago.

[@REGjr]

Sarcastically, to let Nixon know they weren't fooled.

[@OM19_MO79]

Oh, and Russians congratulating Nixon, is not much different from the Japanese capitulating to MacArthur. It was that or see if someone would still stand in a nuclear war. Well, you should be excited, we may found out that this year. I am. I’m tired.

[@MATTINCALI]

all govs in the same club, should know that by now

[@benno291980]

​@@MATTINCALIRight. "We spend trillions of dollars opposing each other, but let's secretly collaborate on this one thing for...reasons..."

[@MrDantres]

It's not just the aperture but also the shutter speed. The two combined make the final exposure. Exposing for the sun lit ground and the astronauts will obviously dim out the stars, as the shutter speed will be too fast, preventing the stars to be registered on the film stock that they used - ektachrome and panatomic-x.

[@thingfish000]

Fauci: "I AM the science!" NDT: "I be the science!".

[@coreycole3316]

I like how we explain stuff we learned in school to those that never paid attention

[@tubecated_development]

KZbin comments for conspiracy-nutz is like an even more broken adult version of their childhood selves getting others to do their homework. EDIT: On close inspection you realise that their ‘questions’ aren’t even real questions, it’s just idiotic ‘gotcha’ rhetoric, as they’re not even remotely interested in learning, they’re not genuinely curious about anything.

[@user-tc3yu7jh1b]

That's because they need to push the lie still

[@MonkeyDLuffy-cm4fm]

I was the class clown and I already know this. 🤣😂

[@PayToPlaySS]

we? ur just a viewer lol

[@DM-wu5hn]

For some people, the world is much duller, less surrounded by lures, but not that bad.

[@digikamikaze]

As someone who previously worked in film and media production I can tell you he's not lying. Aperture, ISO and fps are factors in every video, even your tik tok videos.

[@tubecated_development]

But your brain works differently than the conspiracy-theorist brain. If they don’t understand it and/or they don’t want to accept it, then that makes it a ‘lie’.

[@mihaicolceriu-nicola7148]

​@@tubecated_developmentmore like he has a brain,while those idiots lost it somewhere😂

[@misterdee1418]

Fake news

[@larrykinsella8282]

​@@misterdee1418?

[@adamstevens3263]

Its because theres alot of fake news online so people dont know what to believe or how to even decern real from fake. So alot of people go with the most "mind blowing facts" theyve heard

[@roadkillarmadillo5444]

They said in an interview they didn’t see stars

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

That is correct. It is extremely difficult for an astronaut to see stars with the unaided eye from the bright, daytime lunar surface.

[@paulisfat8077]

You ever seen stars during the daytime?

[@user-ii4ue9yw7l]

Neil says trust the science, trust what I'm saying. Yet he believes that men could be a woman.

[@afropunkx]

I love how people use their own ignorance as an argument. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

[@thegoat3109]

Like evolution theory or big bang theory?

[@numbdigger9552]

​@@thegoat3109yeah. Exactly like those

[@afropunkx]

@@thegoat3109 yeah or round earth theory 🤣

[@electronicfootball9219]

Yeah, just like people who doesn't understand who God is or how he can exist conclude that he is not true. Yet they can't prove he doesn't exist either.😢

[@JohnRapheal7]

How come we only went once and have never been back?

[@XK1773]

They faked it but it was hard to emulate on earth, so they filmed it on location

[@dandan2593]

Wishful thinking!

[@frankhtlllful]

😂

[@aribaariba8609]

Where ?

[@XK1773]

@@aribaariba8609 the moon

[@michaellawson6926]

lmfao

[@decommonifyable]

It's beyond me why this guy gets so much airtime.

[@user-ci8vs7xd3q]

Cause he da black science man

[@user-pc9lv9wf2c]

I definitely think NASA was ignorant to production back then.

[@_maqpie_]

Thats why you see more stars outside of the city. City lights do the same to our eyes 👍

[@bretk7916]

Light on Earth and on the surface of the moon act completely different. You don't have what they call light pollution on the surface of the Moon. And you don't have an atmosphere that absorbs and reflects light. It does let some frequencies of light through of course. But this means that the stars would be bigger and brighter from the surface of the Moon due to no degradation of light being blocked by dust and other things in the air along with the atmosphere. So they would be much brighter and bolder. Especially if we had a camera because they pick up infrared light that we cannot see..

[@mr_koko2070]

​​​@@bretk7916 You're somewhat right, that's why the moon's horizon seems so bold in the videos and pictures from the surface of the moon, but it doesn't change the fact that you can't see the stars - camera, just as your eyes, tries to correct itself to see the bright thing. You can try it out with just a lamp and the camera on your smartphone; if you turn of the lights and turn on the lamp, and try rotating around the room, then you'll see the rest of the room become darker when you point the camera at the lamp. You can imagine that the lamp is the moon (since it's very reflective) and the rest of the room is open space with stars.

[@trillex1861]

​@@bretk7916You dont understand how dynamic range works. Cameras have less dynamic range than our eyes. If you want to see the stars in the image, the surface of the moon would be to bright.

[@bretk7916]

@@trillex1861 this is not true for one the moon absorbs 85% of the light shined upon it from the Sun what does reflect it's not exactly scattered light because there is no other medium in space for light to reflect or refract off of you can tell this by the grayish color of their space suits but when they were on the surface of the Earth they were bright white. The only time the Sun is super bright when you're in space is when you look at it it's not like walking outside after being in the movie theater and it just super bright outside it doesn't work like that there. And as far as your comment about the dynamic range. Unfortunately for you I do know a little bit about it and the camera that they use was a 70 mm black and white film camera which has huge dynamic range especially being in black and white because even with color film the dynamic range is still exceptionally high especially for the blacks and whites. Also in space there is no light pollution or restriction on the light produced from stars along with the continuum in space light just continues on without no degradation so stars would be much brighter and bolder on the surface of the moon...

[@bretk7916]

@@trillex1861 IMAX uses 70 mm colored film. And if you ever been to one of them you know the dynamic range is very vast.. digital does not have near the dynamic range and I am able to take a picture of the roof of my shop with the stars at the same time

[@BinkyStalls]

Extraterrestrial here. I can confirm there are stars during the day but you can’t see them.

[@zerospaceca3376]

Reason number 1 for the moon landing being real: Russia had *very* good reason to call it out if the landing was faked. They didn't.

[@Terence-zz3to]

Orrrrr,if Russia did call it out, how would regular civilian unenthusiest peoples ever be notified or told?? You think they'd just OPENLY give Putin a 60 minutes special to TELL ALL!?!?!? Peoples these days. I've lost hope in this thing called humanity...

[@donnasheppard7371]

Not yet

[@exscape]

@@Terence-zz3to Russia has had over 50 years to somehow get it out that the moon landings were faked (along with their evidence, of course). You really think the US would have been able to keep it quiet for that long?

[@sgfgraham1338]

BC somebody had to be the first to fake it. They were all in it. Show them exiting the atmosphere like you show ocean dives and I will be closer to believing it

[@sakshamsanwaria7486]

​@@Terence-zz3toThere wasn't Russia of today backthen. Why would Putin call out 😂? He was a boy back then.

[@freedommovementmusic]

“There you go” lol … solved. Couple of geniuses 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@thoubias]

Judging from the level of different technologies back in the day, I bet faking it convincingly was harder than actually doing it.

[@tubecated_development]

Correct.

[@Da_Infamous]

Well I've seen Leonardo decapreo or how ever his last name is spelled..... but I've seen him die from the Titanic and thst ship went down like 40 years before he was even born..... I've also seen "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away some little "orphan" blow up a giant man made planet called the "death star" and if we really went to the moon the United States would be sending the moon money..... just sayin

[@Da_Infamous]

So..... its a good thing the gobment wouldn't LIE to us about getting to the moon..... so if "they" say we went than we totally did

[@tubecated_development]

@@Da_Infamous Opinions and feelyweelies, vs physics and falsifiable evidence? I always choose physics. Your mileage may vary.

[@connorpfeifer7549]

how’d they get thru the van allen belt?plus, The vacuum on the moon is almost perfect while in lower Earth orbit it's basically still thin air. Such a vacuum needs to be sealed by at least a couple of inches of metal not just zippers and fabrics. This vacuum can even weld metals together and can't be simulated on Earth in this extreme.

[@skatepark02]

You can do this at home. Set your camera to auto, or use a phone. Look around a room at night with a lamp on, you can see the room. Now point the camera at the lamp, the room turns black and the lamp becomes correctly exposed. The lamp represents the earth and moon, the room is your stars.

[@Fatality.0.0.]

But you are not at home ur on Moon,there is vacoom,there no atmosphere!

[@utkarsh_katiyar]

Wow man, great analogy. Thanks 🙏

[@lisakuntzman7834]

Wackado

[@rickkwitkoski1976]

Exactly! But photography numpties just don't get it.

[@OliviaCerrano]

Makes no sense lmao

[@golden-63]

*The Soviets believed we went to the moon.*

[@articticcblu]

Ok, so america does it then that means no one else does it. Other countries did go to the moon regardless of the space race

[@deusvult6259]

Officially they responded as the rest of the world did. Behind the scenes they congratulated the American govt on such a successful hoax on the ppl

[@apel.ogetika]

NASA didn't put the stars because it will be easier to track the constellations and prove it was fake.

[@diegolisandror2]

Stanley Kubrick definitely was not an idiot

[@topherkrock]

He had nothing to do with the missions to the Moon.

[@VideoRandomChannel]

@@topherkrocknot true, space Odyssey was inspired by something whether you want to believe that or not

[@topherkrock]

@@VideoRandomChannel, that's not what I was saying. We landed on the moon.

[@dejanve]

Exactly!

[@topherkrock]

Was there a reason for mentioning Kubrick? Are you saying that you don't know how to use a _search engine?_

[@pappadappacarhauler757]

NASA may not be idiots but they do think that we are.

[@maymei6742]

Those that agree with this video is absolutely idiots... don't they know space is vacumn ... ie no air and wind.... Why the flag that Neil Amstrong put on d moon is waving!!! Yes NASA was idiot as they couldn't simulate a vacumn environment

[@JSun3000]

FACTS💯

[@lucasrenz3984]

we kinda are in terms of knowledge base

[@unreachablehorizons8624]

You are

[@powbobs]

Explain

[@rickwilliams7431]

Expectations not met. Therefore we did not go to the moon ? Wow

[@tubecated_development]

My ignorance = ‘gotcha’. The mantra of the moon-landings denier.

[@DurainMontong]

Were off to button moon 😂😂😂. Yeah nice space ship😂😂😂

[@geno4825]

NASA threw him $20

[@gazw9595]

Nasa threw him some moon rock....

[@HelloWorld-lh1wk]

dude he is the man who removed pluto from the planet list and you are talking about $20

[@SSK077]

😂😂

[@dollwatibhat221]

May be ur parents should have thrown 20$ on your education 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️

[@joewinston7132]

FlatEarthers threw you 2$

[@Joe1qz]

This is basically the same as when I wake up in the middle of the night and turn on the light of the washroom. I can't see anything...for a few seconds! A camera isn't as sophisticated as our eyes!

[@xbrandi12345x]

You wake up and turn on a light? 😂 I do everything in the dark haha

[@lucasread1743]

@@xbrandi12345xI assume you wake up very early

[@RalphSampson...]

​@@lucasread1743 No. You wake up late.

[@michaelr3333]

People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.

[@xxredshiftxx]

So if the camera can't image the stars , the Astronauts would be able to , I find picturing such a sight much more impressive for a life changing experience.

[@ciupacabraciupacabra6442]

"You think Nasa are idiots ?" Yes and No ....They are idiots but not when it comes to your money

[@oldsteve4291]

For those that think the moon landing was fake Q. Why didn't the USSR, with whom you were racing to get to the moon, scream FOUL REF!!!!

[@evilsharkey8954]

Anyone who’s ever tried to take a picture of the moon can tell you that you won’t get stars in the picture unless the moon is a glaring white blob.

[@tubecated_development]

It makes you realise how few people have ever taken a photo of the moon (or have even looked at a photo of the moon)

[@tbengineering7066]

@@tubecated_development or really paid attention to how they take photos. Look at how they argue that NASA uses CGI. Yeah, they are right, it is CGI. But the CGI used isn't to fake something, but to create a composite photo. What NASA does is no different than the Panorama or Spherical Mode we have on our cameras, which is take snapshots and combine all of them into one picture. And if you ever actually looked at your pictures after using those two modes, you will notice that they are quite accurate to what you see around you (though with some artifact errors due to your movement or things moving around you).

[@tubecated_development]

@@tbengineering7066 I know this. Agreed.

[@jasonjuarez6429]

Yeah... that's not true

[@tubecated_development]

@@jasonjuarez6429 Go do an image search (guess you’re too lazy to do the experiment yourself with a zoom camera) Search ‘full moon zoom’ Count the stars around the moon. Oops. Go look at the HD footage of the IM-Lander separating from Falcon 9. Again, count the stars… Oops. It’s like your default is ‘lie about stuff’

[@damnfez]

That must have been a beautiful thing to see in person then.

[@pennyarcade7772]

I have watched Formula 1 on tv from countries that have a night race. If you glimpse the sky it is completely black, no stars but you do see the moon.

[@tubecated_development]

Must of been NASA/NIKON cameras

[@robertramsey653]

Same with high school football games.

[@SAN-bi2vm]

​@tubecated_development Lmao you are even gramaticaly incorrect.

[@tubecated_development]

@@SAN-bi2vm so what? Doesn’t mean NASA ARENT LYING You shouldn’t be convinced, it’s all lies and that’s what you want to believe. If you want to check that NASA are controlling our cameras now and removing our ability to see and photograph stars near the moon, just image- search online, any image of “super zoom moon night” See what I mean? They’re trying to cover their tracks by controlling our cameras, not allowing our cameras to see stars near the moon.

[@peeperleviathan2839]

Those races are very illuminated and are near city’s

[@markjulius2006]

One issue I have: the capsule's rocket engines would have kicked up tons of moon dust when landing, but videos of the "landing" show no dust clouds at all. The dust would have taken a long time to slowly fall back down with little gravity and no wind to blow it away from the spacecraft. This is something nobody ever talks about.

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

All 6 landings were filmed from inside the Lunar Modules using the 16mm camera and all show dust being disturbed and this is commented on in the audio. It is impossible to have "dust clouds" in a vacuum as there is no atmosphere to cause these clouds. In a vacuum dust moves in parabolic trajectories with no atmospheric deacceleration and this is exactly what we witness in the Apollo footage. In lunar gravity dust will immediately fall back to the surface on reaching its highest point due to no air resistance and will take just over twice as long to fall as it would take in a vacuum on Earth not "a long time to slowly fall back down" as you suggest. However on Earth you also have to factor in the retardation caused by air resistance. Take care.

[@tubecated_development]

Please describe why dust forms clouds Please do an online search of your own question to dispel your myth that ‘nobody’ talks about it…

[@jamesdupray306]

That is not the reason I doubt our brilliant space program did not land on the moon. I think we were so far behind the competition, how did we do it in such short time?

[@traddy1]

Try to take a nice picture of the night sky on earth! It’s hard! 😂

[@Agarwaen]

try to do it during the day instead, as the case was during apollo lunar EVAs.

[@ebreshea]

@@Agarwaen Earth has a heavy atmosphere, which scatters light from the sun, basically washing out whatever light might be coming from the stars. Neil's point is about apertures, which is something completely different.

[@Agarwaen]

@@ebreshea except no. stars wouldn't be be visible to your eyes during the day if we lacked an atmosphere either. only specific wavelengths are even affected by this scattering, so there's no reason why stars wouldn't be visible if they were supposed to be on the surface of the moon. the limiting factor is how much light can get to the sensor (or film) and if you're going to take photos in a situation where most light is FAR stronger then you just have to set up your camera in the manner that means you just cannot catch faint objects like stars, unless you want the rest of your image to be almost entirely white.

[@philipm3173]

Long exposure

[@DanielleAlessandra]

How cool would it be if a billionaire made a hotel of the moon I would definitely go instead of spending $250,000 to go visit the titanic I would go to the moon hotel any day of the week you get to be in a spaceship you get to view earth from the moon that sounds like a lot more fun

[@harleydad1975]

I still can't understand how they got there with "ancient" tech and in 2024 it's so challenging.

[@tubecated_development]

They aren’t planning to redo the Apollo mission, any more than they planning to go to the bottom of the ocean in homemade submarine like they did in 1960. but what happened to the Titan submersible last year? New technology doesn’t mean automatically safe and doable.. Technology has moved on, and so have the challenges. longer missions, new trajectories to different parts of space, diff regions of the moon. All of the microtechnology and new comms requirements present their own challenges. Especially around life-support systems. microtechnology is more vulnerable to space radiation. There is also the not inconsiderable fact that Apollo took about 2% of the federal budget - while the last moon mission was about 0.1% of that.

[@Foolish188]

The Apollo program was incredibly expensive. And convincing Congress that NASA needed both the Saturn Rocket program and the Space Shuttle proved to be impossible.

[@The1QwertySky]

Today there are a lot of regulation holding us back, and also today there is no reason to go there. Back them they wanted to beat so iet union in the race

[@lancehaysom47]

All to do with $$. They spent a lot of money back then govt backed. Now it is private money and relatively a lot smaller $$

[@tubecated_development]

@@lancehaysom47 Is there a ‘private’ space company which doesn’t have NASA as their primary customer?

[@robertmoye7405]

That's funny, we have lots of pictures of the stars and the galaxies!

[@3mikeb]

How did they go through and more importantly, back through the ozone layer without burning up?

[@theMVPeet]

Same as how you can barely see any stars in the city but in the woods or mounts you'll see tons of them

[@MotersickleBum]

THERE'S NO ATMOSPHERE ON THE MOON!

[@kamikeserpentail3778]

​​@@MotersickleBumuhhh... Are you implying there's less atmosphere in the woods? The guy above you is talking about light pollution. Unless you're just emulating the people who say we haven't landed on the moon, but then satire isn't always easy to read in text.

[@robertborden2666]

In the Apollo 13 story, the crew had to align their navigation at some point and their main trouble was they didn’t have a visual on any stars due to the brightness given off by earth and the sun itself. Once they realized they had a very big known star to look at (our sun), they got it together and made their calculations. It’s indeed very hard to see stars when the big, bright planet it sitting in your face.

[@michaelr3333]

People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.

[@user-jt3kj1nn8c]

I just love how the cameraman allowed the other dude to be labelled the first to land

[@theonlyspoon]

Shhhhh puppy. Go back to bed.

[@paulday5722]

The camera was mounted on the leg of the lander before it left Earth. Again, do you not think literal rocket scientists wouldn't think of that?

[@carrolbrooks2143]

Using that logic, I guess we've never been to space either!?!?!?😮😅😊😂

[@XPISigmaArt]

It's funny how the comment section still believes NASA forgot to fake the stars in the photographs. People are wild.

[@xTROLLINGx]

Wait until they realize the astronauts never filmed the earth when all they had to do was point their cameras up since they had landed on the near side of the moon. They couldn't fake the earth in a film but they could with a still image.

[@tubecated_development]

@@xTROLLINGxhow would live footage of the Earth have looked any better/different than a still? What film cameras were they using?

[@xTROLLINGx]

@@tubecated_development it would have looked the same way as when they recorded themselves on the Rover they have more footages of that Rover than they do of Earth.

[@tubecated_development]

@@xTROLLINGx You didn’t answer my question tho. What camera was that? And what would they have gained by filming the Earth with that camera vs the stills camera/s?

[@xTROLLINGx]

​@@tubecated_development Two cameras were equipped with 60-millimeter focal length lenses; the other had a high-resolution 500-millimeter lens enough to record the earth if they had pointed it up. They would have gained a new perspective from the moon of earth to share with the world since they were all about winning the cold war and not for an actual accomplishment which is why they haven't returned to the moon if they even can because who deletes a blueprint that can help humanity in their future.

[@KayKay114]

One thing ive never heard argued....why didn't the Soviets call them out? They certainly would have if it was fake.

[@skophansen9525]

Read Anthony Ciril Sutton's books from 70s and 80s and you will figure it out. US's and SSSR's oligarchy were cooperating together behind people's back. Obviously, you can't jear about that in Legacy media.

[@branako2205]

Probably because the US has something on Russia and China too. After over 50 years why hasn’t another rover or orbiter or satellite taken a picture of the flag and original moon rover? Even the Hubble telescope could probably take a decent picture of them.

[@vijayvijay4123]

Honour among the scoundrels

[@erniemckracken1593]

Worlds a stage full of actors. WCW wrestling and politics, no difference.

[@bjornfeuerbacher5514]

@@skophansen9525 Yes, dude. Something like the Cold War never happened. Sure. :D

[@LauraSolace]

All the psychos come out when you suggest it might be a lie

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

And do you have actual evidence to back up your suggestion or not?

[@BigTimTravels]

Lmao funny how Niel Already said traveling to the moon is impossible

[@ulkairvillan3219]

NASA are not idiots but they know most people are.

[@pops8595]

exactly!

[@lazymass]

Mostly people that really to this day think earth is flat, space doesnt exist and we weren't on the moon...

[@joshuaphillips755]

I'm an idiot and I know most people are

[@pops8595]

@@lazymass the guy believes that some human being stepped on the moon, LOL

[@lazymass]

@@pops8595 well... you know, education does a lot for one... You should try it some day...

[@One_1_11]

When I was in 9th grade my earth science teacher showed us a documentary claiming that the moon landing was fake

[@tubecated_development]

Shouldn’t have been teaching. I’d follow that up.

[@heresy3573]

@@tubecated_development Yea Id agree

[@Angel-.dust.887]

That’s ridiculous

[@CrixusHeart]

I believe we did go to the moon (I think) but it's always good to be skeptical. 😊

[@tubecated_development]

@@CrixusHeart most people in these comments don’t seem to know the difference between rational, scientific skepticism vs cynical, ignorant incredulity + gullibility (aka “parroting stuff I read on TikTok and then doubling-down on it forever”) .

[@carolcatanzaro7811]

They also mentioned something about the flag!!

[@Tarpinitaoino]

No, we landed on the moon; but the moon did not land on me.

[@cenozoaband]

Imagine Buzz Aldrin, who lives in this age. He went to the moon and back, one of the first. He risked his life, he did experiments up there. Only to have some guys today erasing his and the other astronauts' contributions. This is insane

[@jangtheconqueror]

Those idiots couldn't erase the accomplishments of the Apollo missions with their silly little theories. It does highlight the need for better education standards in the US though

[@cenozoaband]

@@jangtheconqueror I agree, but just imagine how these guys feel when they come across such people..

[@kylecrowson1417]

I'm sure he doesn't take them very seriously.

[@Yesbutactuallyno123]

Iirc he or one of the other apollo astronauts literally beat someone up over it so i think they do care Again i could be wrong​@kylecrowson1417

[@sakurashogun]

You don't have to imagine, it is on record even recently there is video of Buzz beating common sense into some of these wackos.

[@ojonasar]

To people like that, ask them to take a snapshot of a group of friends on a clear dark night and let them ponder why they can’t see them stars either. Then get them to set a long exposure- oh look, there they are.

[@bananian]

It would mean his friends are fake.

[@SzilardBartalos-bs8bt]

​@@bananianbest comment ever

[@AdrianOkay]

They would try again and again with different permutations of hardware until they manage to get the stars in the picture, because of a very deep problem of selective bias

[@Kikikikikiki723]

​@@AdrianOkay😮

[@h2w25]

Imagine believing in anything NASA has ever put out…

[@4YDDY80]

For non photographers. Go take a photo of the moon at night and tell me if you can see other stars in the photo

[@4YDDY80]

Not every camera can pick it up

[@tubecated_development]

@@4YDDY80Name one that can?

[@tubecated_development]

I’ll wait….

[@BlyGuy]

We def didn't land on the damn moon

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

You defo have given no evidence to back up your claim.

[@govindmishra7938]

"no amount of evidence can persuade an idiot ."

[@patrickjane2024]

well the more people question the narrative the better.americans like to claim this is not fake to make themselves look superior than other countries.

[@topherkrock]

​@@patrickjane2024, there's a difference between "questioning the narrative" and "rejecting the truth". Answer me this: what is the narrative that you are questioning? What is the purpose of your questioning? If you want the truth, should you reject all the answers that don't fit your personal bias or should you question your bias if it doesn't fit the answers you're getting?

[@shy404usernotfound]

​@@patrickjane2024 but..... we DID do it. If saying that as a fact, makes you & your country "feel" inferior, then that's a you problem. Not ours.

[@Soul.Is.Willing]

Nasa in hebrew means to deceive

[@tubecated_development]

@@patrickjane2024The more people get to undermine the truth, the more people will claim that it was ‘fake’. And the more Americans will hate their own people.

[@PatriceFERLET]

Anyway, a friend of mine one day told me that the moon photographies are faked for this reason. I told him to take a photo outside (at night, anyway) of his car. Taking attention that the sky is in the view. He saw no stars. Then I could explain that the exposition time + the light in the streets avoid having so low lights from the stars. Excuse my English.

[@tubecated_development]

Next time on a clear night, ask him to take a super-zoom photograph of the Moon’s surface ;) or even to do an image search for some…

[@lild0die]

Jeez the view of the stars from the moon has to be insanely intense compared to what I’m used to

[@tubecated_development]

Not in daylight

[@child_of_God316]

No Neil we just think you are

[@fuji302]

I’m guessing if it were lunar night it probably would’ve been the most incredible view of space that human eyes would’ve ever witnessed.

[@FiresplitterSpeedrun]

Yes, but idk if that sight would have been worth it considering the price they would have had to pay for it, and I don't think that view would ever have came to us.

[@on19s]

@@FiresplitterSpeedruncause it’s fake. We never have been on the moon. It’s 2024. Why haven’t we gone back? It’s been how many years? How many technological advances? Yea aight…

[@FiresplitterSpeedrun]

@@on19s You do know what the temperature on the moon during nighttime is, right? To call it a little chilly would be the understatement of the century.

[@on19s]

@@FiresplitterSpeedrun is that another excuse I see? Why does this matter if they REALLY landed on the moon in 19sum it’s 2024. Tell me why we can’t do it again. We are supposed to progress not regress 🤣

[@FiresplitterSpeedrun]

@@on19s I answered specifically to why there was no pictures taking during the lunar night and that is therefore the context I reply in. Idk what you are on about though lol. You might want to ask people actually working on NASA about that because I am not in charge of their decissions.

[@JSSTyger]

They're laughing at flat-Earthers.

[@johngavin1175]

Flat earthers are insane

[@dodgersallday4290]

There’s plenty of non-flat-earthers that think the moon landing was faked

[@MediaSubliminal]

Doesn't everyone? It's really easy to prove that the earth is not flat

[@Jordy-927]

@@MediaSubliminal not if you disregard real science and make up your own. 🤣

[@FusionSimulations]

​@Jordy-927 I'm assuming you're one who believes the Earth is flat. And that you somehow know the "real science", that proves the hundreds and thousands of scientists before us and currently - that have all replicated results - wrong?

[@bung1029]

Of course we didn't. That's the dumbest thing people ever bought

[@hermankoopman9468]

Dangerous, but maybe possible to go to the moon. But, how to go back?

[@tubecated_development]

Rocketses.

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

My guess would be by using a rocket. Take care.

[@kimhorton6109]

I had an Uncle who’s worked on Lasers for the US around this time. NASA was looking at them for distance measurements and such. We watched the Lunar landing at his house that day. I believe every bit of it.

[@zachnoll6245]

My managers mom AND dad worked for the apollo missions (cant remember which ones and think they worked on several of them) and he gets very upset when people try and say the moon landing was fake. Like personally offended and he can shoot down all their counter points like he's speed running COD.

[@FUNNYMANERICWHITE]

​@zachnoll6245 just curious, did he ever go to the moon or seen others do it from position

[@zachnoll6245]

Its critical thinkig, wether they worked on just the math for vectors or worked with engineering or any of the other 400,000 jobs they had to do. They worked on it. They know it was possible because math never lies. Like when the we asked one of the scientist who worked on the nuclear bomb if they ever thought it might not work he said No, he knew exactly what was gonna happen and how big it was going to be (did mention a thing about numbers on a page get so beg they can become impossible for the human mind to comprend and once seeing it go off didnt expect it to be so massive) @@FUNNYMANERICWHITE

[@OM19_MO79]

@@zachnoll6245 Offended by what? That people can’t believe some Americans and later some Russians went to the moon 50 years ago and that was it? They should be embarrassed to have been part of a disguised battle for world supremacy in a war that’s still being fought and we’ll all lose. Why don’t we go to the moon? Because the real answer is not that it was fake, but we went there to define who would own the world for the following decade or two. We don’t go now because it’s pointless, there are no rewards, space exploration is physically impossible, sci-fi magic is not real to make us go beyond the moon and back safely, fast, with long stays with benefits for everyone. Today, Russians rather want to destroy their enemies and conquer the world than going to the moon while Americans are on the brink of both the end of democracy and a civil war. At least with the “we never went to the moon” answer you don’t end up disappointed in mankind.

[@kozmiclando]

@@zachnoll6245So Basically U Know Someone That Knows Someone Who Pushes Nasa Lies…Good For U 👏🏿

[@erlanggacn9034]

The more you defend a lie, the angrier you become.” - Mitch Albom

[@Tuface_Killa97]

Never heard this one

[@Clicks-Prosper]

Naw

[@silvercenturion4214]

Neil isn’t lying

[@cyberpunk11x]

Neil Tyson is an actor.

[@rogemillecastillo3183]

Made up quote...

[@chillywillie6283]

The first moon landing in July 1969 was my last year of little league baseball.

[@jackfiercetree5205]

The weakest point on a GIANT RAFT of unexplained discrepancies.

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

" unexplained discrepancies".....You have not listed any. List 2 or 3. Take care.

[@derkamon]

for additional information, Nvidia reproduced the moon scene, and simulated the light intensity, and the camera exposure control (hope I got the name right), and there was no stars in the final rendered image

[@GrnXnham]

Moon landing hoaxers are at about the same level of credibility as flat earthers.

[@never_give_up90]

Aren't they the same people?

[@tubecated_development]

@@never_give_up90no. Often, but not always, not even close.

[@MrDrluv84]

You sound like someone with a booster shot..

[@never_give_up90]

@@tubecated_development well, the ones I seem to meet are always both. I meant, the same people, not the same denials.

[@user-du4oy7ul6n]

No many scientist belive that moon landing is a hoax

[@johncontreras4060]

The way he treats others with other views and realizations makes me scaptical of this man. Ridicule is the go-to for those who want to discredit new and better ideas. Good luck with your fake observation of others.

[@WinkenSmile]

If those people assume that the moon landing is fake they probably also assume their arent any NASA scientists.

[@shawngreen5175]

But if you actually listen to the Apollo 11 interview, they even say they didn't see any stars

[@thefolks5199]

Which makes sense because they aren’t beneath the stars anymore.

[@arewecrazyyet]

Their visors where tinted so that they wouldn't go blind.

[@sewy2293]

It makes sense as same happens on earth. Try looking to the sky at bright night in the big city you most certainly will not see any stars. Then go to the countryside where there is not that amount of light as in the cities and you’ll notice that now you can see them. It happens because there a large amount of light sources in towns and it kinda deflects all the star light that is coming from space. Same goes on the surface of the moon because of the Sun

[@SS-yx5hm]

In that interview why is it that they all seem depressed, nervous and not wanting to talk about one of the most historic events in human history? It’s very odd behavior making it seem like they didn’t just come back from being on the moon.🤦🏻🤷🏻‍♂️

[@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth]

@@SS-yx5hm Do you mean the Apollo 11 post flight interview which took place after the 3 weeks of quarantine where the 3 Apollo 11 astronauts answer many questions while smiling, laughing and cracking jokes with the reporters? Have you ever bothered to actually watch it yourself? Take care.

[@JohnKendall-je4rx]

Of course theres still people who think the earth is flat too. Im not sure where they think ships that come over the horison were before they could see them.

[@vlatter9537]

Pay attention to these recent 4 total solar eclipse paths. They tell you the world ain't a globe with a moon orbiting in that 1 direction NASA tells us

[@davidgoltsch5689]

I bet you believe in Santa don’t cha?

[@clariteatv88]

​@@vlatter9537 ppl don't connect the dots. The globe we were taught about in school was actually a sphere🌐. A snow GLOBE is more accurate to the shape of the earth. It's flat AND round at the same dang time. Antarctica is at the equator line, nothing past it exists. Most of us will never go to outer space to see up close and personal for ourselves (rockets arent cheap) so they can literally tell us whatever they want to... But it's been proven, the Info is out there. Ppl just have to stop being lazy and look for it. Not to mention be in the right head space to accept new info that contradicts EVERYTHING we were made to believe. Some ppl arent strong enough for that so they stay in the same mental space theyve been in. Oblivious and unenlightened🤷‍♀️ Let them ppl have their bliss in ignorance. Better them than us💯

[@minutemansam1214]

The solar eclipse paths fully line up with what you would expect from a round Earth.@@vlatter9537

[@GODsoN_8471]

This is my thing people don't believe in God because they have never seen him & don't consider our planet & the beauty of nature as evidence but none of us have left Earth's atmosphere and seen for ourselves that it's round they just take the word of others and have no problem with the fact that every picture we see of earth is CGI lol .

[@2286customx]

Idc what the topic is. If NDT is speaking I’m skeptical.

[@DrDeuteron]

the full moon from earth washes out the stars, the full moon from the moon? Yeah.

[@hakanakdag9491]

main reason is, it is so hard to go to the moon even with today's tech and because of that ppl think it might be fake.

[@UV_Lightning]

Not true, search up the Artemis program.

[@Staticmess007]

The Camera man never dies

[@cutiebunnyamber3447]

another NPC comment unrelated to thr video, good job.

[@Staticmess007]

@@cutiebunnyamber3447 Your response is generic like your NPC comment 😂

[@cutiebunnyamber3447]

@@Staticmess007 stop referring to yourself

[@Jackmerius_Tacktheritrix5733]

This makes no sense.

[@LAKush90]

@@cutiebunnyamber3447You're a grown man pretending to be a anime female character, you're most likely on meds and not allowed around elementary schools....

[@chrissyp7]

So why's it so hard to return with literally 100,000x or more the computing power as they had 🤔

[@tubecated_development]

Doesn’t matter how powerful your computer is, you need 1. Working super-heavy launch rockets. 2. A crewed moon lander. 3. Fully tested guidance and life-support systems. 4. Mission design and dress rehearsals. All of those things cost money and require a workforce and infrastructure. All of those things require funding. All of these things need to happen to make a crewed moon-landing mission. Artemis is many times more complex and expansive a program than was Apollo, yet it is being attempted at a fraction of both the cost and workforce of Apollo and with all new technology. Your simple mind just cannot grasp any of that, can it? Be honest with yourself if you can’t be honest here.

[@leelaanderson1838]

I never thought it was faked. But his point is gold!